Linux-Networking Digest #70, Volume #10 Sun, 31 Jan 99 18:14:07 EST
Contents:
Re: win95 cablemodem host, linux client to Internet? ("Eugene")
Armada Docking Station (Phil)
IP Masq for Age Of Empire (Harry Chen)
Re: Linux Server slows down my Connection? (Nick Rout)
Re: dhcpd.leases (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: DHCPD multiple nics (Darin Fisher)
Using a Linux box as a router ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tulip 0.90f ("Brad Kittredge")
Problems with ISP and ISDN ("Karl Krukow")
Re: How do I make domain match my machine? (Benjohn007)
Re: Tulip 0.90f (John Strange)
Re: problem with ppp not connecting (Clifford Kite)
Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home (Zac Anderson)
Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home ("Cartman")
Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home ("Cartman")
Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home ("Cartman")
Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home (Zac Anderson)
Great Tech jobs in So. Cal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Using a Linux box as a router (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: 3c905 board problems not seeing network? ("DADA")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: win95 cablemodem host, linux client to Internet?
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 21:00:22 GMT
1. network the two machines together. Read howtos at www.linux.org/help
2. Connect the Linux box to your ISP. The gateway must have 2 network cards
in it, one for local network, one for the Internet.
3. Read IP masquerading howto at www.linux.org/help
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7928et$7gu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've just setup a Red Hat Linux 4.2 system with an NE2000 compatible
network
>card, which was setup ok. I have another machine running Win95 also with
the
>same NE2000 card, hooked up to the Internet with a cable modem. The cable
>company's ethernet card is also in the Win95 machine for going out to the
>world.
>
>I've been reading some of the messages on DejaNews and in the mini-HOWTO's,
>but I'm not clear on what it is I have to do to network my Linux machine
into
>the Win95 machine (first of all), and secondly how to be able to hit the
'net
>from that machine.
>
>- what kind of network config is needed on the Linux box? Eg. how to setup
>the IP address, gateway, etc...? - Do I need some kind of gateway or proxy
>software installed on the Win95 machine? If so, where can I get it?
>
>
>I can ping localhost on the Linux box, but that's all. I haven't upgraded
>the kernel or anything, so everything it's a standard RH4.2 install, minus
>the sligh configuration changes I've made to /etc/hosts, hosts.conf, and
>modules.conf.
>
>Thanks for any help! Please cc: replies to me if you can.
>
>
>John Hopkins
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 14:57:40 -0700
From: Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Armada Docking Station
Does anyone know what the base address and interupt is for the Compaq
Armada Docking Station?
I am trying to configure LINUX to run on a Armada 4120 but have not been
able to configure it yet. I thought I would try the "ne" driver, but I
would need the above first. Windows does not report either in device
manager.
Using scanpci inder Redhat 5.2 does not show any network devices.
tia,
-Phil
------------------------------
From: Harry Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masq for Age Of Empire
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 21:37:46 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============619989F1F3014BFA4873CA37
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi. Does anyone know what ipmasqadm arguments should I use for Age of
Empire?
I am running Kernel 2.2.0.
thanks.
==============619989F1F3014BFA4873CA37
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="hchen1.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Harry Chen
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="hchen1.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Chen;Harry
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
note:Public PGP is avaliable upon request.
fn:Harry Chen
end:vcard
==============619989F1F3014BFA4873CA37==
------------------------------
From: Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Server slows down my Connection?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:09:18 +1300
My experience using a windows NAT solution (ie ip-masquerading ) is that the
surfing is faster! because the machine behind the firewall does not have to cope
with the modem etc. Sorry I know that doesn't answer your question fully!!
Eriksson wrote:
> If I use a linux box (p60) as a Gateway to the internet for my LAN, will it
> slow down the speed of the connection?
>
> Hear this. When I surf the net with my p2, 300 using a 56k modem. My
> connection is good. But if I use the SAME modem to the Linux box surfing
> ain't that good. Is that because it is a slower computer or is there
> someting wrong with my settings?
>
> And if I hook up the LAN to the net through the linux box.. Will I still get
> the same "surf" speed on my p2, 300? (as it is one of the computers on the
> LAN)
>
> Is there a way of checking the speed of my connection on the Linux box?
> Thanx!
>
> /Martin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: dhcpd.leases
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:09:38 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Andrew Tatton wrote:
> >
> > I'm pretty new to linux so I might be wrong. But as afar as I know the
> > dhcpd.leases file is created automatically by the dhcp daemon. All
> > configuration should be done in /etc/dhcpd.conf.
>
> Hmmm. When I read the message I thought the goal was to copy the data from
> another machine and store it in a format readable by dhcpd-2.0.
>
> Anywat, the dhcpd daemon doesn't automatically create the lease file.
> Everytime I've started up dhcpd I had to "touch /etc/dhcpd.leases" first.
> You are correct about the configuration. It is _very_ unwise to try and
> edit the dhpd.leases file.
>
> > Jon Horner wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >Can someone send me the format for the /etc/dhcpd.leases file? I am
> > >trying to set up a backup dhcp server on my linux box and I don't have
> > >one of the above files and I need one.
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> > >Jon
> > >
>
>
But how would the "backup" dhcp daemon know when to start offering IP
addresses? How does it find out that the primary dhcp server is down?
Because it can't copy the dhcp.leases file (via NFS mount, I would
think)? Unless I'm missing something, it seems to me that these are
equally important technical questions to answer.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCPD multiple nics
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 14:49:39 -0800
Actually, there is a much easier way. On the command line, dhcpd can be told
which
ethernet device to monitor. Check the manuals, but I think you can just say:
dhcpd eth0
to get what you want.
Hope this helps,
Darin
Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> In article <78qe8v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm wanting to use DHCPD to give some 98 clients IP addresses. However, I
> > need to route through another NIC that I DON'T want DHCPD to send leases to.
> >
> > I've got the dhcpd.conf file setup with the required settings for the
> > internal net, but whenever I start the service it sez:
> >
> > no subnet declaration for eth0 (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx)
> >
> > and exits. the HOWTO doesn't cover multiple nics and the man pages are a
> > bit long-winded. I looked at the DHCPD FAQ and it doesn't cover this topic
> > either.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > -Richard
> >
> >
> >
> Use ipfwadm to block bootps and bootpc traffic into and out of the second
> interface.
> --
> Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Using a Linux box as a router
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 20:55:49 GMT
I just ordered an ADSL line and ISP service w/5 static IP's. I don't want to
spend $1000 on a router when I have a trusty Linux box sitting here. What I
would like to do is set up this box as a router. By this I mean I want to
still be able to use it as a Linux workstation/server, but have it route my
network also. And I mean ROUTE, not do NAT (masquerading), just route.
I am aware of the Linux Router Project, but this turns a stripped-down Linux
box into a router only w/o all the other functionality that I want/need so
this isn't the solution.
I am hoping someone can point out some documentation, give hints, etc. to get
me started.
TIA!
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Brad Kittredge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tulip 0.90f
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 12:41:16 -0800
Does anyone know where I can find a binary of tulip 0.90f? I'm running
RedHat 5.2, and a URL where an rpm lives would be great.
Thanks...
------------------------------
From: "Karl Krukow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with ISP and ISDN
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 04:23:44 +0100
Hello.
I've have a problem connecting to my ISP using my ZyXEL omni.net
ISDN modem. I've read the ISP-HOOKUP-Howto and other howtos
but haven't come up with a solution for the problem.
I've used netcfg to configure network, and set up a ppp interface.
When I use usernet to connect, everything looks fine, the modem connects and
it all looks ok. (the usernet ppp0 goes green)
But I can't use netscape It looks like I have no connection to the DNS,
and when I try pinging the DNS, it doesn't return any packages.
I'm very new to linux and I don't know much about ppp and networking.
If anyone has any idea about how to solve this, please reply.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benjohn007)
Subject: Re: How do I make domain match my machine?
Date: 31 Jan 1999 22:56:14 GMT
i think u need to to have ur ISP who gave u the ip address to change their DNS
to make it so that brie.com point to your IP
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange)
Subject: Re: Tulip 0.90f
Date: 31 Jan 1999 22:21:45 GMT
Do not where there is a rpm. I copied the driver and recompiled
the kernel. Look around here
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers
Brad Kittredge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Does anyone know where I can find a binary of tulip 0.90f? I'm running
: RedHat 5.2, and a URL where an rpm lives would be great.
: Thanks...
--
While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: problem with ppp not connecting
Date: 31 Jan 1999 15:33:37 -0600
Clifford Kite ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: It's a problem I haven't seen before. I can make these observations:
: on your end. This causes pppd to terminate before sending all the initial
: LCP messages when it's used with chat. This should not be happening
This should read
It's a problem I haven't seen before. I can make these observations:
The ISP is terminating the connection or something unusual is happening
on your end. This causes pppd to terminate before sending all the initial
LCP messages when it's used with chat. This should not be happening
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: Zac Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-unix,comp.unix.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 08:54:50 GMT
I have a laptop with 5.2 on it and the network card (3c589C) is working
fine.
I have setup the network with all the info from my 98 machine. BUT I
think
I have a problem in the route tables, because i'm unable to ping the
gateway.
Anyone here on TCI.NET's @Home service and is successfully running
Linux Redhat v5.2 wanna give me a hand? I'll post as much info below
as possible.
I belive my routes are not right, if someone wants to help me with the
proper syntax, i'd be very grateful...
-Zac Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Static IP Address: 24.2.197.148
Kernel 2.0.36
IFCONFIG eth0
eth0 Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:A9:A2:40
inet 24.2.197.148 bcast:24.2.197.255 mask:
255.255.255.0
Interrupt: 3 Base Address:0x300
ROUTE
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
Metric Ref Use Iface
24.2.197.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
U 0 0 0 lo
default 24.2.197.1 0.0.0.0 UG
0 0 0 eth0
/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
IPADDR=24.2.197.148
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=24.2.197.0
BROADCAST=24.1.197.255
ONBOOT=yes
/etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=false
HOSTNAME=c1005424-c.mntp1.il.home.com
DOMAINNAME=mntp1.il.home.com
GATEWAY=24.2.197.1
GATEWAYDEV=eth0
------------------------------
From: "Cartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-unix,comp.unix.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:09:50 GMT
ok...post the contents of your /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 file
if that is where redhat keeps it :)
Cartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <remove the NOSPAM. to reply>
http://www.ncircus.com/ <The Best Site One the Net for UFO/Alien Videos and
Moon Photography>
"Simple thoughts from insane minds 24 hours a day...your watchin' the
therapy channel"
Zac Anderson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a laptop with 5.2 on it and the network card (3c589C) is working
>fine.
>I have setup the network with all the info from my 98 machine. BUT I
>think
>I have a problem in the route tables, because i'm unable to ping the
>gateway.
>
>Anyone here on TCI.NET's @Home service and is successfully running
>Linux Redhat v5.2 wanna give me a hand? I'll post as much info below
>as possible.
>
>I belive my routes are not right, if someone wants to help me with the
>proper syntax, i'd be very grateful...
>
>-Zac Anderson
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Static IP Address: 24.2.197.148
>Kernel 2.0.36
>
>IFCONFIG eth0
>
>eth0 Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:A9:A2:40
> inet 24.2.197.148 bcast:24.2.197.255 mask:
>255.255.255.0
> Interrupt: 3 Base Address:0x300
>
>ROUTE
>Kernel IP routing table
>
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
>Metric Ref Use Iface
>24.2.197.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
>0 0 0 eth0
>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
>U 0 0 0 lo
>default 24.2.197.1 0.0.0.0 UG
>0 0 0 eth0
>
>/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
>any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
>
>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>DEVICE=eth0
>IPADDR=24.2.197.148
>NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>NETWORK=24.2.197.0
>BROADCAST=24.1.197.255
>ONBOOT=yes
>
>/etc/sysconfig/network
>NETWORKING=yes
>FORWARD_IPV4=false
>HOSTNAME=c1005424-c.mntp1.il.home.com
>DOMAINNAME=mntp1.il.home.com
>GATEWAY=24.2.197.1
>GATEWAYDEV=eth0
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Cartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-unix,comp.unix.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:15:13 GMT
Oh duh...my bad..I guess I should have scrolled down more :-)
Cartman wrote in message ...
>ok...post the contents of your /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 file
>
>if that is where redhat keeps it :)
>
>Cartman
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] <remove the NOSPAM. to reply>
>http://www.ncircus.com/ <The Best Site One the Net for UFO/Alien Videos and
>Moon Photography>
>"Simple thoughts from insane minds 24 hours a day...your watchin' the
>therapy channel"
>
>Zac Anderson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I have a laptop with 5.2 on it and the network card (3c589C) is working
>>fine.
>>I have setup the network with all the info from my 98 machine. BUT I
>>think
>>I have a problem in the route tables, because i'm unable to ping the
>>gateway.
>>
>>Anyone here on TCI.NET's @Home service and is successfully running
>>Linux Redhat v5.2 wanna give me a hand? I'll post as much info below
>>as possible.
>>
>>I belive my routes are not right, if someone wants to help me with the
>>proper syntax, i'd be very grateful...
>>
>>-Zac Anderson
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Static IP Address: 24.2.197.148
>>Kernel 2.0.36
>>
>>IFCONFIG eth0
>>
>>eth0 Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:A9:A2:40
>> inet 24.2.197.148 bcast:24.2.197.255 mask:
>>255.255.255.0
>> Interrupt: 3 Base Address:0x300
>>
>>ROUTE
>>Kernel IP routing table
>>
>>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
>>Metric Ref Use Iface
>>24.2.197.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
>>0 0 0 eth0
>>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
>>U 0 0 0 lo
>>default 24.2.197.1 0.0.0.0 UG
>>0 0 0 eth0
>>
>>/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
>>any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
>>
>>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>>DEVICE=eth0
>>IPADDR=24.2.197.148
>>NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>>NETWORK=24.2.197.0
>>BROADCAST=24.1.197.255
>>ONBOOT=yes
>>
>>/etc/sysconfig/network
>>NETWORKING=yes
>>FORWARD_IPV4=false
>>HOSTNAME=c1005424-c.mntp1.il.home.com
>>DOMAINNAME=mntp1.il.home.com
>>GATEWAY=24.2.197.1
>>GATEWAYDEV=eth0
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Cartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-unix,comp.unix.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:22:33 GMT
it's your host name perhaps?? it should be just c1005424-c
ok I see a few problems
>>/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
>>any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
this looks wrong to me try this and I don't know what the any is for(anyone
care to help me here?)
any net 24.2.197.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.1
I am no expert...but if my conversion from slackware is correct this should
work...you had your gateway address in where your network address should go
and your IP where your gateway should have been...be sure you make a copy of
the file before you make any changes..I could just be some insane person
posting for fun :-)
>>-Zac Anderson
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>Static IP Address: 24.2.197.148
>>Kernel 2.0.36
>>
>>IFCONFIG eth0
>>
>>eth0 Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:A9:A2:40
>> inet 24.2.197.148 bcast:24.2.197.255 mask:
>>255.255.255.0
>> Interrupt: 3 Base Address:0x300
>>
>>ROUTE
>>Kernel IP routing table
>>
>>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
>>Metric Ref Use Iface
>>24.2.197.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
>>0 0 0 eth0
>>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
>>U 0 0 0 lo
>>default 24.2.197.1 0.0.0.0 UG
>>0 0 0 eth0
>>
>>/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
>>any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
>>
>>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
>>DEVICE=eth0
>>IPADDR=24.2.197.148
>>NETMASK=255.255.255.0
>>NETWORK=24.2.197.0
>>BROADCAST=24.1.197.255
>>ONBOOT=yes
>>
>>/etc/sysconfig/network
>>NETWORKING=yes
>>FORWARD_IPV4=false
>>HOSTNAME=c1005424-c.mntp1.il.home.com
>>DOMAINNAME=mntp1.il.home.com
>>GATEWAY=24.2.197.1
>>GATEWAYDEV=eth0
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Zac Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-unix,comp.unix.misc,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Redhat v5.2 & TCI @Home
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 10:42:49 GMT
Still no luck...I made a few changes like described below, but nothing.
-Zac
Cartman wrote:
> it's your host name perhaps?? it should be just c1005424-c
>
> ok I see a few problems
>
> >>/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
> >>any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
>
> this looks wrong to me try this and I don't know what the any is for(anyone
> care to help me here?)
>
> any net 24.2.197.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.1
>
> I am no expert...but if my conversion from slackware is correct this should
> work...you had your gateway address in where your network address should go
> and your IP where your gateway should have been...be sure you make a copy of
> the file before you make any changes..I could just be some insane person
> posting for fun :-)
>
> >>-Zac Anderson
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>Static IP Address: 24.2.197.148
> >>Kernel 2.0.36
> >>
> >>IFCONFIG eth0
> >>
> >>eth0 Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:A9:A2:40
> >> inet 24.2.197.148 bcast:24.2.197.255 mask:
> >>255.255.255.0
> >> Interrupt: 3 Base Address:0x300
> >>
> >>ROUTE
> >>Kernel IP routing table
> >>
> >>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
> >>Metric Ref Use Iface
> >>24.2.197.0 * 255.255.255.0 U
> >>0 0 0 eth0
> >>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0
> >>U 0 0 0 lo
> >>default 24.2.197.1 0.0.0.0 UG
> >>0 0 0 eth0
> >>
> >>/etc/sysconfig/static-routes
> >>any net 24.2.197.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 24.2.197.148
> >>
> >>/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> >>DEVICE=eth0
> >>IPADDR=24.2.197.148
> >>NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> >>NETWORK=24.2.197.0
> >>BROADCAST=24.1.197.255
> >>ONBOOT=yes
> >>
> >>/etc/sysconfig/network
> >>NETWORKING=yes
> >>FORWARD_IPV4=false
> >>HOSTNAME=c1005424-c.mntp1.il.home.com
> >>DOMAINNAME=mntp1.il.home.com
> >>GATEWAY=24.2.197.1
> >>GATEWAYDEV=eth0
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Great Tech jobs in So. Cal
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 23:02:10 GMT
We're a new recruiter in Los Angeles with lots of positions to fill in all
technology-related areas. Please e-mail your resume and salary
requirements to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you live anywhere in Southern
California. No fee to you.
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Using a Linux box as a router
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:36:19 -0800
In article <792hm4$hhn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I am hoping someone can point out some documentation, give hints, etc. to get
> > me started.
>
> Just turn ip-forwarding on in kernel (recompile with the option and then
> write "echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward" . If you have set up the
> routing table correct, then this is all you need.
>
> Greetings
> Bernd
>
Isn't ip-forwarding turned on by default in most distributions? I thought
it was.
Luca
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "DADA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c905 board problems not seeing network?
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 23:13:23 GMT
>Go to www.redhat.com
>and search the RedHat Network Card Compatibility List for your Card
>I think there is a problems with 3c905 [a or b]
You're absolutely right. I got the 3c905b because I went to #linux on efnet
and asked what's a good network card. I couldn't get to redhat.com for a
few days for some reason, so I never saw the compatibility list. I'm
getting an NE2000 today and I'll try that instead.
thanks,
dada
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
