Linux-Networking Digest #70, Volume #12 Sat, 31 Jul 99 17:13:33 EDT
Contents:
Problem with kernel 2.2.7 (Suse) and RTL 8139 Ethernet (Christian Hoppe)
IPchains help ("Dave Wasilka")
inet addr question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Q: NFS 2.0.36 vs 2.2.10 ?? (Rowan Hughes)
Re: Auto check for email (Monte Milanuk)
Net problems in 2.2.10? (Sam)
Re: Help: PLIP install on laptop (Dick Repasky)
Network unreachable (George Laverick)
Re: Cnet pro120c ether card with tulip driver (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Web Based Linux Management ("Karl McMurdo")
Re: Ethernet card installation and configuring (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Re: Allowing root telnets and dial-up logins (midknite)
Re: IPchains help (Stephen Satchell)
Re: Net problems in 2.2.10? (Stephen Satchell)
Kernel NFSD and hosts.deny woes (David Nillesen)
Re: Allowing root telnets and dial-up logins (Abdullah Ramazanoglu)
Re: Sendmail initialization is slow (Villy Kruse)
Cisco 605 DSL "modem" and Linux -- how to configure? ("Joel Rosenberg")
Cisco and Red Hat (Lee Mahan)
Re: Network unreachable (Stephen Satchell)
Re: Installing Linux (=?x-user-defined?Q?=BCv=C3M=A4h?=)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Hoppe)
Subject: Problem with kernel 2.2.7 (Suse) and RTL 8139 Ethernet
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 18:26:06 GMT
Hi.
My system worked fin under kernel 2.0.36 (Suse), with Samba and
everythin going. Now I tried to upgrade to Kernel 2.2.7 (because of
improved SMP-efficiency) and here the problems are. With the module
for the Realtek 8139 Chipset I can`t even compile the kernel. After
getting the latest source code I compiled the kernel and evrything
worked fine, except. The dummy device failed and I can`t even start a
successfull PING. Has anyone discovered similar problems or even has
an solution to the problem ? Help would be appreciated very much.
Thanks in advance
Ciao
Christian
-- Heute ist nicht alle Tage, ich komme wieder, keine Frage --
------------------------------
From: "Dave Wasilka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPchains help
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 18:20:28 GMT
I desperatly need to get a Firewall setup on my machine.. I already have IP
masquerading running.. currently this is my IPchains setup:
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
The problem is I keep getting nuked from a guy using ICQ.. I need to be able
to still telnet in from a remote location.
thanks for your help!
-Dave.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inet addr question
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 18:46:25 GMT
I use my RH6.0 Linux server to access the internet for my home lan. It
used to work great until I installed an external ISDN terminal adapter.
The problem I am having involves the /etc/hosts file entries. PPP will
use the /etc/hosts entry of my Linux box for the IP address instead of
accepting the IP assigned address. If I comment the line in /etc/hosts
for my Linux box before I call out then it works fine.
I thought interfaces could have there own IP address assigned to them,
but PPP acts like I have a static IP address instead of dynamic. Is
there an way to fix this so I don't have to edit the /etc/hosts file
everytime I want to call my ISP?
I would like to use diald on my system but this problem is preventing me
from attempting. Any help would be appreciated.
Dan
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rowan Hughes)
Subject: Q: NFS 2.0.36 vs 2.2.10 ??
Date: 26 Jul 1999 07:49:11 GMT
I have a bootp/nfs server for booting several diskless
clients, with all machines running 2.0.36, and Debian 2.1
It all works fine. A client booting with 2.2.10 gets past
the bootp part OK, but cannot mount, or very slowly mounts
its remote files systems, which drop out after a few minutes.
The 2.2.10 kernel complains about "RPC: portmapper error 101"
or "server time out". It doesn't appear to an /etc/exports
problem nor a TCP wrappers problem since syslod doesn't
show any denial of service lines. The client mounts /
OK, but then things just appear to slowy grind to a halt.
I have upgraded to 2.2beta40 of rpc.mountd/rpc.nfds but this
doesn't help. What do I have to upgrade on the 2.0.36 server
to get 2.2.10 going as a client??
Thanks
--
=======================================================
Dr Rowan Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qld Dept Natural Resources Forestry Bldg, 4.06
CIS group, Indooroopilly. W:07-38969705 H:07-38768083
------------------------------
From: Monte Milanuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Auto check for email
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 1999 19:54:14 -0600
Michael wrote:
> Is it possible to get Linux to check for emails automatically, I mean is
> there a programe there can call up the net, check for emails and then
> shutdown again, for instance every 10. minutes?
>
> Tanks in advance
>
> md
Well, yes... after you write it ;) Seriously, though, that is what the
'cron' daemon is for. Not _just_ checking email, mind you, but scheduling
just about anything to happen on a regular basis. I would suggest try
using 'fetchmail', written by Eric Raymond. Once you have it properly
configured, and dial-on-demand as well, just set up a cron script to run
every 10 minutes and it should automagically dial out, get your mail, and
disconnect. YMMV
Monte
------------------------------
From: Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Net problems in 2.2.10?
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 14:13:23 -0500
Greetings!
I recently compiled, installed and was able to boot with 2.2.10 but then
the kernel wouldn't see my Linksys card (10mb) at all. It did work under
2.0.36.
I did /sbin/ifconfig and all it saw was the lo and not the eth0, so I
tried to use ifconfig eth0 and it reported the device was not suported.
>From that I went back and checked my kernel configuration to make sure I
configured it correctly, it *appeares* that I did. There's probably one
box not marked, but which one? theres alot of them! Does anyone know
which one(s) *must* be checked in order for this to work? Thanks!
As a side note, I'm not able to mount my CD or dos partitions as well.
For the CD, it reports it's not a block device and for dos, it reports
it's not supported. Again, I checked my kernel and support is there!
Arg!
Emmett
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dick Repasky)
Subject: Re: Help: PLIP install on laptop
Date: 31 Jul 1999 19:21:19 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999 18:41:53 GMT, Steffen W. Mehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I got an old 486 laptop that I want to install Linux on.
>It only has a floppy drive, so I'm trying to install via
>PLIP by connecting to my desktop machine that is also
>running Red Hat Linux 4.2, kernel 2.0.30, then doing a NFS
>install
>
>I started by recompiling the kernel and adding PLIP support as
>a module. I load the module using:
>/sbin/insmod plip io=0x278 irq=5
>
>These are the jumper settings for the parallel port.
>I then activate plip with:
>/sbin/ifconfig plip0 10.0.2.17 pointopoint 10.0.2.21 up
>
>I checked dmesg and I see:
>NET3 PLIP version 2.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>plip0: Parallel port at 0x278, using assigned IRQ 5.
>
>and when I run /sbin/ifconfig plip0
>plip0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr FC:FC:0A:00:02:11
> inet addr:10.0.2.17 P-t-P:10.0.2.21 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x278
>
>so, it seems to be setup up fine. However, when I boot the laptop
>with redhat boot disk and select NFS install -->PLIP, it asks for
>the IP address for which I'm using 10.0.2.21
>Netmask: 255.0.0.0
>Default Gateway (IP): 10.0.2.17
>Primary Nameserver: 10.0.2.1
>
>After this, it searches for the desktop machine (10.0.2.17) but never
>finds it. I'm not certain about these IP addresses as I'm using the
>values given in the "PLIP Tips" on Red Hat's homepage. I did change
>my /etc/hosts to 10.0.2.17. I also set the parallel port of the laptop
>to
>run in ECP & EPP mode.
>
Do you have entries for both 10.0.2.21 and 10.0.2.17 in /etc/hosts
on your desktop machine?
Can you ping the laptop from the desktop?
Have you configured the desktop for NFS?
You might also try configuring the desktop for ftp connections and
trying an ftp install over plip. Sometimes, NFS seems a bit finicky.
Dick
--
Remove the underscore from my e-mail address to reply by mail.
------------------------------
From: George Laverick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Network unreachable
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 19:30:31 GMT
I have just added aLinux box to an existing NT network. It is a Dell
Poweredge 6300 with the RAID controller removed. I have loaded RH 5.1 and
everything seems to work except networking. I installed TCP/IP with an IP
address of 192.1.1.94, subnet mask of 255.255.0.0, network of 192.1.0.0
and broadcast of 192.1.255.255. The computer came with an Intel
Etherexpress Pro 10/100. When that didn't work, I reinstalled with a 3Com
3C905, same result. I have tried another 3C905 and two 3C590's, all with
the same result. I know the 3Com cards are good because I took them out
of working systems.
Is there something unique about the Dell?
I have run Netconf and Linuxconf and everything looks right to me. Any
ideas?
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cnet pro120c ether card with tulip driver
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 22:38:21 +0300
Abdullah Ramazano�lu wrote:
> Is there any one using CNET PRO120(C) 10/100 ether card without
> problems?
> It uses Macronix 98715 chip which uses tulip driver. I have two machines
[snip]
> So I really would like to know whether there is anybody out there
> successfully using this card.
It has turned out that the problem is specific to my old 486 board. I
think there are PCI compatibility problems with this very old
early-PCI-age card. Swapped my 486 mo/bo with a friend's, and it works
great. CNet-Pro120c is a great card with such a performance and cost.
And Donald Becker's tulip driver (thanks Donald) works perfectly.
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: "Karl McMurdo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.security
Subject: Web Based Linux Management
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 13:51:36 -0600
Is there such an animal ?
Unixware has their 'Webtop' interface that allows system management with a
web interface, and Samba has it as well, I'm looking for the ability to
manage a linux server from a remote browser (or even a local browser
although that makes less sense as you are in X and presumably X management
tools are available) I have a number of application servers that do not
have X installed, and a couple that do, my 'desktop' machine is actually a
laptop running WinNT, and I run a windows X-Server to connect to those
machines with X running, and telnet into the others to do sysadmin tasks. I
have been experimenting with perl and have created a script to do the most
common task (add/mod/del users) with a web interface, and am thinking of
expanding it to cover more tasks, but don't want to reinvent the wheel.
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Karl McMurdo
------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Ethernet card installation and configuring
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 22:59:32 +0300
Hello Michael
Michael J Campbell wrote:
>
> Hello all-
>
> I have physically installed an ethernet card in my system and am trying
> to configure it for Linux (I am using Red Hat 6.0).
>
> I think I next need to configure and rebuild the kernel - is this the
> correct action or is there an easier way around this - or would it just
> be easier to reinstall Linux (I remember during the setup it asking if I
> wanted to configure the OS for a LAN).
>
> If rebuilding the kernel is the way to go, where are the best sources of
> information to get step-by-step instructions for this.
>
> Thanks much.
All the drivers are compiled as modules in RH6.0. So all you have to do
is just go to linuxconf --> Basic host info, and set you host name, IP
addr etc along with *the driver name* for your specific NIC. It should
be up and running when you quit linuxconf.
BTW, though the stock kernel that comes with initial installation is OK,
it is prepared as a least common dominator kernel. That is, the emphasis
is on working without problems on *any* hardware for obvious reasons.
So, depending on your specific hardware and working pattern/plans, there
remains a lot of tuning with it. And kernel compilation is one of the
first issues in doing anything serious with your Linux. It is quite a
straightforward process and explained generically in Kernel-HOWTO, and
specifically in RedHat-Linux-Installation-Guide (both on CD).
Before compiling kernel, you should have installed
kernel-source-2.2.5-15.i386.rpm (on CD)
HTH
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: midknite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Allowing root telnets and dial-up logins
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 12:53:55 -0700
Matt Harrell wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Linux (at least Red Hat) apparently does not allow root logins via
> telnet or dial-up. How do you change this behavior to allow these
> logins? Thanks.
edit the /etc/securetty file. if has some basic info in it, and you
can also look at the securetty(5) man page (try `man 5 securetty`).
Note that allowing root to connect via telnet isn't very
security-minded...
--
brian kowolowski
gpg key / infos http://www.cryogen.com/midknite/gpg.html
gpg print: F6B6 076D 4BFC CD14 7C14 1A2F 61DA BDE5 7A88 D6C3
------------------------------
Subject: Re: IPchains help
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Satchell)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:18:38 GMT
/sbin/ipchains -A input -i lo -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ipchains -A input -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ipchains -A input -p tcp -d 192.168.1.0/24 telnet -y -j ACCEPT
/sbin/ipchains -A input -p tcp -y -j REJECT
This accepts anything from the local port, anything from your local
network (be sure to disable spoofing and smurfing), and external telnet.
It blocks all other TCP services -- you may need to "punch additional
holes" to get what you want.
The last line is special: it only affects SYN packets not otherwise
handled above.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Wasilka) wrote in
<M7Ho3.282$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I desperatly need to get a Firewall setup on my machine.. I already have
>IP masquerading running.. currently this is my IPchains setup:
>
>/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
>
>The problem is I keep getting nuked from a guy using ICQ.. I need to be
>able to still telnet in from a remote location.
>
>thanks for your help!
>
>-Dave.
>
>
>
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Net problems in 2.2.10?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Satchell)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:20:41 GMT
Sounds like the device numbers changed, and you need to rebuild your /dev
directory so the numbers are correct. This is not a task for the faint-
hearted, but it can be done.
See if there is a script to automate this process somewhere on your system.
Details would depend on the distrubution you originally installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam) wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Greetings!
>
>I recently compiled, installed and was able to boot with 2.2.10 but then
>the kernel wouldn't see my Linksys card (10mb) at all. It did work under
>2.0.36.
>
>I did /sbin/ifconfig and all it saw was the lo and not the eth0, so I
>tried to use ifconfig eth0 and it reported the device was not suported.
>From that I went back and checked my kernel configuration to make sure I
>configured it correctly, it *appeares* that I did. There's probably one
>box not marked, but which one? theres alot of them! Does anyone know
>which one(s) *must* be checked in order for this to work? Thanks!
>
>As a side note, I'm not able to mount my CD or dos partitions as well.
>For the CD, it reports it's not a block device and for dos, it reports
>it's not supported. Again, I checked my kernel and support is there!
>Arg!
>
>Emmett
>
>
------------------------------
From: David Nillesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Kernel NFSD and hosts.deny woes
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 14:09:14 +1000
If i put ALL: ALL in hosts.deny i can no longer share any NFS mounts
out. Even if I allow all services for a particular host it still wont
allow a connection.
This is annoying me , because i would like to have my system fairly
secure.
Any ideas?
--
Thanks,
David Nillesen
Northnet Internet Services
+612 67749300
For info on what this jumble below is look right at the bottom.
Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID
pub 2048/BBCA4E3D 1998/01/03 David A Nillesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=====BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK=====
Version: 2.6.3ia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------------------------------
From: Abdullah Ramazanoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Allowing root telnets and dial-up logins
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 23:12:17 +0300
Matt Harrell wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Linux (at least Red Hat) apparently does not allow root logins via
> telnet or dial-up. How do you change this behavior to allow these
> logins? Thanks.
mv /etc/securetty /etc/securetty.save
Also see 'man login' for security issues.
--
Abdullah Ramazanoglu [ aramazanoglu AT demirbank DOT com DOT tr ]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: Sendmail initialization is slow
Date: 19 Jul 1999 08:37:28 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Allen Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David,
>
> Add the machine's hostname and IP address to /etc/hosts.
>
Fully qualified with domain part, that is; otherwise sendmail will still
ask DNS for the proper name with domain part. And that takes time.
Villy
------------------------------
From: "Joel Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Cisco 605 DSL "modem" and Linux -- how to configure?
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 15:36:21 -0500
I just upgraded to DSL, and it works just fine under Windows 98. I have the
Cisco 605, which I'm told is really a router masquerading as a modem, and it
works just fine -- for Windows 98. (It connects with Dial-up Networking.)
For those who are confused, or not familiar with the Cisco 605, it's a PCI
board, not the external box, and the only connections it has (other than, of
course, the internal ones) are two phone jacks. Through the modern miracle
of DSL, I have my fax/modem plugged into the other jack on the Cisco card,
and can send a fax at the same time that I have a DSL connection. Pretty
neat.
What isn't neat is that I can find no way of configuring this to work under
Linux. I've done an online search, and asked some knowledgeable people, and
what I keep hearing is something to the effect of, "no problem -- just plug
your network card into the Cisco router, which has the obvious problem of
there be no place to plug a network card into the board, in the first place,
and secondly, I don't actually have a network card installed in the machine
at this time.
Which leads to the obvious question: how do I get a connection under Linux?
Please cc via email
--
I sure bet Liam Neeson feels a sense of
vindication when he sees all those cool
fast food promotions with his face on them,
'cause, man, that Schindler's List
Happy Meal promotion went nowhere.
(Rick Carter)
-=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=*=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=-
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Mahan)
Subject: Cisco and Red Hat
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:31:07 GMT
Got a Cisco 4000 series router and a brand new RH 6.0 server.
Locally, I can access the mail and telnet service...but not so
remotely. Any ideas as to what the @%$@%@ is going on here?
Intelligent answers only need apply.
Lee
Technology Consultant
Design West
*Any unsolicited email sent to this address will be
dealt with under Washington state law and federal
guidelines.*
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Network unreachable
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Satchell)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 20:25:27 GMT
Read the Ethernet-HOWTO, which should be in the directory /usr/doc/HOWTO.
This will tell you how to get your Ethernet card working properly.
Your settings are reasonable if your network is indeed a /16 instead of the
/24 that the address of 192.1.1.x would imply. Check with your system
administrator. If it is a /24, then the netmask would be 255.255.255.0 and
the broadcast address would be 192.1.1.255 (and the network address
192.1.1.0).
I've run the 3COM 3C905B TX cards in a large number of Linux systems with
no trouble at all, even a Dell.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Laverick) wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>I have just added aLinux box to an existing NT network. It is a Dell
>Poweredge 6300 with the RAID controller removed. I have loaded RH 5.1
>and everything seems to work except networking. I installed TCP/IP with
>an IP address of 192.1.1.94, subnet mask of 255.255.0.0, network of
>192.1.0.0 and broadcast of 192.1.255.255. The computer came with an
>Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100. When that didn't work, I reinstalled
>with a3Com 3C905, same result. I have tried another 3C905 and two
>3C590's, all with the same result. I know the 3Com cards are good
>because I took them out of working systems.
>
>Is there something unique about the Dell?
>
>I have run Netconf and Linuxconf and everything looks right to me. Any
>ideas?
------------------------------
From: =?x-user-defined?Q?=BCv=C3M=A4h?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
hk.comp.pc,hk.comp.software,hk.rec.videogame,tw.bbs.comp.language,tw.bbs.comp.mswindows,tw.bbs.comp.mswindows.nt,tw.bbs.comp.mswindows.win95,tw.bbs.comp.multimedia,tw.bbs.comp.shareware,tw.bbs.comp.software
Subject: Re: Installing Linux
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 02:57:50 +0800
�h�� wrote:
>
> �ڸչL��Pentium 133 with 64M EDO Ram�¾���Linux�A�����C�A
> ���n�HD�H��486�����i�H��Linux�A�A�|����Ԩ��t�t�q���C
�ݨӧA�������N���n���...
P-133 w/ 64MB �|�C�H�ڬݬO�A�}�F�@��`�n�A���٤����D�a�H
�A�������P�ɶ]�@����A�����C�~��..�A�������ܡH
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
