Linux-Networking Digest #82, Volume #10           Mon, 1 Feb 99 23:13:37 EST

Contents:
  TCP: **bug**: copy=0, sk->mss=0 (Haavard Engum)
  Re: Intranet Server (Aaron Baugher)
  Re: Install second network card (C Sanjayan Rosenmund)
  Realtek compatible card: rtl8139. Network freezes! (Marius Bezuidenhout)
  Re: Linux to Win95 networking problem (Trevor)
  Netatalk node/router? (dts)
  3C905 Question ("Dave Walsh (MTT)")
  how to configure cgi with Apache ("De Munnik Schoenen B.V.")
  Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack? ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karsten 
Patzwaldt ))
  DHCP server setup - Thanks for the help - now a couple other things :) ("GV Morgon")
  Re: Kernel 2.2.1 ans IP Masquerading (Malware)
  Re: ppp RX errors after kernel compiling (J. Scott Berg)
  Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get? ("Barbara A. Severance")
  Re: Romote "root" login ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Reasonable precautions for a laptop with dynamic IP? ("Mitchell Maltenfort")
  ???:Odd Masqu "Problem"??? (Douglas E. Mitton)
  Re: Networking/Cable Modem ("Peso")
  Question about SNP
  PPP over SONET? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Question about SNP (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: IP Alias + DHCP (Paul Lim)
  Slow Telnet ("Craig C.")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Haavard Engum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TCP: **bug**: copy=0, sk->mss=0
Date: 01 Feb 1999 23:32:14 +0100


Hei!

Last night, one of my linux-boxes started to write this message to
the console:

TCP: **bug**: copy=0, sk->mss=0

I looked around in the kernel source-tree, and the source-file that this
message most probably comes from is.

net/ipv4/tcp.c

My experience with kernel-programming is rather poor, so I could not
understand why this message appears.

Does anyone know why it appears?

I am running Redhat v5.2(intel) with kernel v2.0.36 

-- 
Haavard Engum 


------------------------------

Subject: Re: Intranet Server
From: Aaron Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 01 Feb 1999 15:56:13 -0600

"kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Currently I am planning to setup an Intranet Server for my
> office... however due to budget concern I have to use one of my
> office PC . The setup of this is as such... 133 Pentium, 1.2G
> hardisk, 16M ram. Could anybody tell if this is sufficient for an
> Intranet Server running Linux & Apache? Later I might need to add an
> hard disk to make it run as SQL server as well. Any recommendation?

My system is a Cyrix 150, 2GB drive, 64MB RAM.  Running Linux 2.0.30,
Apache, MySQL, QMail mail server, diald, and ppp, it shows about
11.5MB RAM in use.  As long as you don't run X on the system, it
should handle the things you mentioned just fine.  

You don't mention SCSI or IDE.  That can make a big difference,
especially if you do exceed your memory and start using swap.  If
you've got SCSI, swapping isn't quite as much of a concern.  Drive
speed is generally the last think I'm skimp on for a server.

I use MySQL as my SQL server, and it works quite well.  You might also
look at mSQL and PostgreSQL.  Assuming you write any intranet apps in
Perl, the DBI package provides a consistent interface to all of these.


Aaron
-- 
Aaron Baugher - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Quincy, IL, USA
Extreme Systems Consulting - http://haruchai.rnet.com/esc/
CGI, Perl, Java, and Linux/Unix Administration

------------------------------

From: C Sanjayan Rosenmund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Install second network card
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 21:50:08 GMT

Patrick Doran wrote:
> 
> Here is my problem,
> 
<snip>
> However I can NOT get Linux to notice my second networking card (D-LINK
> 530TX PCI PNP)! I was able to get the the ISA non-PNP to work, but the
> second card just will not install.
> I have tried :
<snip> 
> insmod 8390
> insmod ne2k-pci io=0x620
> ifconfig eth1
> 

You are looking in the wrong place.  Linux only looks for *one* NIC.
after it finds one, it stops looking, unless you tell it to.  If you
are booting from lilo, add the line append = "ether=0,0,eth1" then it
will "notice your card.  to allow all the other machines to use the
cable modem, I set up ipfwadm and it works great.  . .
-- 
Sanjay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows has detected that a gnat has farted near your computer.
             Press any key to reboot.

------------------------------

From: Marius Bezuidenhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Realtek compatible card: rtl8139. Network freezes!
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 09:19:34 +0200

I having problems with a Accton Sohobasic NIC310 network card. I have
e-mail Accton, their soho basic devision and Artmedia that now does all
the soho basic card's. Artmedia says that it is a realtek 8139
compitible card.

My card works with this driver and everything is fine until it seems
like there is too much traffic going to the server and then is gives
this with ifconfig:

eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:E8:61:09:D8
          inet addr:192.168.9.1  Bcast:192.168.9.255  Mask:255.255.255.0

          IPX/Ethernet 802.2 addr:00000667:0000E86109D8
          IPX/Ethernet 802.3 addr:00000666:0000E86109D8
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:2386 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:2099 errors:39 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:78
          collisions:5
          Interrupt:10 Base address:0x6700

Is this high number of errors normal? I did not have this problem with
my ISA NE2000 compatible card.
How do I find out what parameters there is for a module? Currently my
conf.modules says this:

alias eth0 rtl8139
options driver full_duplex=1,0,1 debug=1

So, every no and then my whole network freezes (not everything but
everything to do with TCP/IP), so I can access my Mars but not Samba or
DHCP.

Regards,

Marius Bezuidenhout


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trevor)
Subject: Re: Linux to Win95 networking problem
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 07:24:06 GMT

On Mon, 01 Feb 1999 21:22:02 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I know that similar problems have been posted before, but I've yet to see a
>good answer so far.
>
> I have a two Win95 machines running TCP/IP hooked together through a 10 port
>Linksys hub. The two win95 machines see each other fine, all tcp apps work
>without a hitch. I recently have installed Redhat 5.2 running kernel 2.0.36 on
>a third system and I'm attempting to attach it to the network.

Hi Dan,

Are you certain that the network is running on the  Linux box - does
ifconfig show eth0 active? My system (RedHat 5.1 with 2.0.36) will
ping loopback without the network running, as it does not need to talk
to the NIC, I use 'usernet' which shows and activates eth0. lo, and
ppp links. It is also necessary to make sure the network is activated
at boot time. I am not convinces that  Linuxconf always sets the
network configuration correctly, so I have been doing it manually.

Hope this helps.
Trevor.
Oakhaven Consultants Ltd
Reading, England.


------------------------------

From: dts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netatalk node/router?
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 11:42:08 +1000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Have been given a task by my supervisor - does anyone know if Netatalk
can be setup as a node rather than a router?

As the router option will stuff our system.

Any comments please.


------------------------------

From: "Dave Walsh (MTT)" <"dave j walsh"@keane.com>
Subject: 3C905 Question
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 01:26:51 GMT

I'm kind of a newbie to Linux (slackware).  Can someone give me the
dummies guide to getting a 3c905B card working.  I did manage to get a
3c5x9 card working.  There was a driver that I just unremmed and it
loaded fine.

Any help would be appreciated.

TIA

Dave


------------------------------

From: "De Munnik Schoenen B.V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to configure cgi with Apache
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 00:23:49 +0100

I can't figure out how to configure apache to run cgi-scripts (mainly perl
scripts). I already checked the site www.apache.org but since I'm new to
linux it isn't clear to my how to do it. I wan't my linux machine to
function as a testmachine for a webpage with scripts. I created the
directory ~/public_html/cgi-bin/ where I put the scripts with .cgi
extension. I'm sure the scripts are correct because the work on other
systems and I've got perl in the same directory...

something some people out there don't like, I know MSIE is available for
Solaris and HP-UX but does anybody know if it's available for Linux (i386)
because I wan't to check the webpage both with Netscape and Explorer...

(BTW I'm using slackware-3.6)

with regards
Martijn de Munnik



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karsten Patzwaldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,comp.security.misc
Subject: Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack?
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 19:15:46 +0100

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Theofel wrote:
>> Windows blows NetBIOS-packets on your ethernet permanently. This is not an
>> attack but a Windows bug (or feature, as MS would call it :) ).
>Can this be switched off somehow? I mean we have to same problem here in our
>office and it causes a dialup every 15 minutes which costs us much money. 
>
>To understand the problem perhaps a little bit better, I'd like to add that only
>one of our 4 windows clients shows this phenomenen.

Really? I have 2 Windows 95 boxes here, and both of them have this problem.
To avoid the dialup, you may try to use a packet filter. An other solution
is to disable NetBIOS on your Windows boxes, but I think you need it. Maybe
you can configure your dialup host to ignore these packets, RTM for this.

-- 
Karsten Patzwaldt                                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "GV Morgon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP server setup - Thanks for the help - now a couple other things :)
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 15:50:18 -0800

Ok, I got the DHCP server setup and running, and I thank all of you for the
help you provided.  It worked out great, now I have a couple more questions:

How do I specify gaps in the dhcpd.conf file?  If I want to assign addresses
on subnet 167.20.107.0 starting at .10 and ending at .254, but I want to
omit some address in the middle, say from .30 to .35 then a couple of unique
addresses such as .44, .55, and .66.  Following is my dhcpd.conf:

subnet 167.20.107.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
    range 167.20.107.10 167.20.107.254;
    default-lease-time 36000;
    max-lease-time 43200;
    option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
    option broadcast-address 167.20.107.255;
    option domain-name-servers 10.3.64.60, 10.4.64.60;
    option domain-name "mycomany.com";
}

Could I simply enter multiple range lines? eg:
subnet 167.20.107.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
    range 167.20.107.10 167.20.107.29
    range 167.20.107.36 167.20.107.43
    range 167.20.107.45 167.20.107.54
    range 167.20.107.56 167.20.107.65
    range 167.20.107.67 167.20.107.254
    default-lease-time 36000;
    max-lease-time 43200;
    option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
    option broadcast-address 167.20.107.255;
    option domain-name-servers 10.3.64.60, 10.4.64.60;
    option domain-name "mycomany.com";
}

Or do i need to specify each range block with it's own subnet/netmask header
and option block?

The next question:  In what file can I place the all ones fix, "route
add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth0" line to automatically execute on system
startup?  I looked around in rc3.d directory but couldn't find where it
would go.  Wouldn't it go in the same place as the line that assigns the ip
address to the eth0 device?  I tried putting the route add statement in the
/etc/sysconfig/static-route file but it had no effect on startup.  No man
page on that file to direct me on just how to go about it.  The book I
picked up _Running_Linux_  by Welsh and Kaufman mentions using the
/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1 file for route statements, but the file does not exist on
my system, not even as a 0 byte file (as static-routes does).  I tried
creating the file and putting the route add line in there, but when I issue
a "route" command it appears it didn't run that file.

Finally:  If I am looking to add a second or third network card, on
different subnets (some of our offices have more than one subnet per
location) Is there anything special I have to do to get dhcpd to listen to
the supplemental network cards, or will it listen to all network cards by
default and all I have to do is add the address lease info in the dhcpd.conf
file and do an all ones fix on eth1 and eth2?

Again, thank you for your help

Glenn V. Morgon




------------------------------

From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.1 ans IP Masquerading
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 00:44:58 +0100

Hi Brant,

you wrote:
>     <After both NIC are initialized>
> finiding module dependancies...
> ...    nfsd.o unresolved symbols
> ...    ip_masq_mfw.o unresolved symbols
> ...    ip_masq_portfw.o unresolved symbols

What does "depmod -a -e" say? Maybe you just got a unlucky combination
of configuration options that missed a dependency.

> <when I get to modprobe>
> <cannot find> module net-pf-4
> <cannot find> module net-pf-5
> <repeats for three pairs of identical error messages>

Add following 2 lines to /etc/conf.modules if you do not need support
for IPX or Appletalk:

alias net-pf-4 off
alias net-pf-5 off



Malware

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. Scott Berg)
Subject: Re: ppp RX errors after kernel compiling
Date: 2 Feb 1999 01:53:37 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Norbert Bous  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi Folks,
>
>after compiling a kernel (2.2.1 / 2.0.36) I got speed problems when
>connecting to the internet. I'm using a standalone PC with an external
>modem on Suse6-Linux. Changing the parameter "crtscts" to "xonxoff" in
>/etc/ppp/options doesn't change anything.

I'm assuming the first group was 2.2.1 and the second group was 2.0.36.

>          UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST  MTU:1524  Metric:1
>          RX packets:1644 errors:86 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:86

My first (and only, at the moment) suggestion would be to bump your
mtu down to 1500.  Maybe even try it significantly lower (576 being
the value of choice).  1524 "shouldn't" be a problem, but apparently
there are broken routers out there, apparently including those between
me and my ISP...  But, if this were the problem, I would expect TX
errors and not RX errors.

If that doesn't cure things (and maybe even if it does), have a look
in your syslog output files (in my case, it's the debug file, which
gets debug level messages) for something that looks like

kernel: TCPv4 bad checksum from 209.178.49.11:0050 to 153.34.110.113:0560, 
len=906/906/926 

Not that I know what to conclude from this, but maybe we're at least
having the same problem...

                                -Scott Berg


------------------------------

From: "Barbara A. Severance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Dial up connection - How hard can it get?
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 18:52:22 -0800

Bert Bulder wrote:
> 

> 
> pppd -d -detach /dev/ttySx 38400 &
> 
> worked!!
> 
> I'm on the internet for the first time after a week long trying desperately.
> 
> Now I'll have to see how to automate this.
> 
> Bert Bulder
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

There is a program called EZPPP which (under AfterStep anyway) gives you
a nice GUI interface, handles the scripts, DNS, etc. About as trouble
free as it can get.  Go here,
http://www.serv.net/~cameron/ezppp/index.html   read the docs, follow
the directions, and you SHOULD have easy access.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,nl.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Romote "root" login
Date: 1 Feb 1999 23:23:35 -0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In nl.comp.os.linux pazuzu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or is it because a malicious person would have to crack two passwords
> this way (user and root) instead of one (root)?

exactly. further, people tend to use stupid passwords, even for root access.
-- 
Grobbebol's Home                 |  Don't give in to spammers.   -o)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~bengel     | Use your real e-mail address   /\
Linux 2.0.36  on  an i586/64 MB  |        on Usenet.             _\_v  


------------------------------

From: "Mitchell Maltenfort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Reasonable precautions for a laptop with dynamic IP?
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 20:10:28 -0700


I'm in the process of pounding my laptop into a satisfactory workstation via
Linux.  I'm not sure if I'm going to keep using dial-up access or make the
investment into a high-speed linkage.  (I'm holding off on that decison
until this fall when I move to another state.  I'll see what's there.)  I am
not going to be attempting to dial into the box, and it won't be
continuously on or connected to the internet.

I've already put all:all in my hosts.deny file.  I'm installing the RH5.2
updated libraries to plug security holes.  I use 2.0.36, configured for
security options (no NFS, firewalling switch on, etc.)

Beyond that, what do I actually need to make it reasonably improbable that a
cracker will enter my system while I'm checking mail or downloading?  I've
read the HOWTOs on security and the ipfwadm page but I'm still a bit blurry
on where the line is drawn between the needs of a machine with a permanent
connection and dial-in access and me wading at the shallow end of the
learning curve.

Thanks in advance.






------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton)
Subject: ???:Odd Masqu "Problem"???
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 00:54:53 GMT

I am experiencing an odd "problem" in my IP Masq operation ... it
happened with V2.0.36 and ipfwadm and is still occuring with V2.2.1
and ipchains.

The problem is that when I access a web page with graphics (?) on the
same subnet as me and my ISP and only from the PC behind my "firewall"
some graphic images refuse to complete loading.  It is fairly
consistent.  When I access my home page (see below) from my kids
Win3.11 computer (via Netscape) one of the Linux logos at the top
doesn't load and only the top 5% of the "Kids Picture" will load.  The
Linux machine loads the images perfectly EVERY time, the kids machine
is im-perfectly EVERY time.  No other extra-subnet access seem to be
effected.  The access in this manner are faster than the kids old 14.4
modem so they are happy regardles BUT it bugs me!   :-)

(I actually thought it was a patch problem and that the BIG upgrade
for a 2.5 years newer installation would resolve the problem BUT such
was not the case!)

Netscape still shows the "waiting" indication BUT it never completes
(in the time my patience allows) and when I click STOP it shows the
outline of the missing graphic and the rest of the web page
successfully.

My network is 2 computers connected via NE2000 clones, a Win3.11 that
my kids use and my Slackware 3.6, kernel V2.2.1 (it was Slackware 96
and V2.0.36 before).  The firewall is via a dialup PPP connection on
the Linux machine.  I use the simplest, single rule ipchains command
.. everything masq out, nothing in BUT ping, etc (all the standard
stuff).

I have no idea how to approach trouble shooting this situation, it
seems consistently BAD so it could be my configuration ... at least
I'm consistent!!!

Has any one seen, diagnosed or otherwise aware of this type of
problem?  Any comments, suggestions or pointers would be greatly
appreciated!


================================================
  Doug Mitton - Brockville, Ontario, Canada
                'City of the Thousand Islands'
  Amateur Radio: VE3DMZ      ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
          EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
           http://www.cybertap.com/dmitton
  SPAM Reduction: Remove "x." from my domain.
================================================

------------------------------

From: "Peso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking/Cable Modem
Crossposted-To: alt.solaris.x86,comp.dcom.modems.cable,sdnet.cablemodems
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 02:55:17 GMT

Download 602ProIs Lite and you done

http://www.602pro.com/lite/download.html
Peso


------------------------------

From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Question about SNP
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 13:51:45 -0500

Hi,

I was asked to look for a package that could handle encrypting telnet and
ftp sessions.  After searching around, I found something called SNP,
Secure Network Protocol (V 0.91) at ftp.csie.nctu.edu.tw/pub/CSIE/snp

It looks like the ideal solution for what we want to use it for; however,
I don't have any networking analysis hardware (or software) to see if it
contains anything that shouldn't be there or if it works as it is being
advertised.

I was wondering if anyone else out there has ever used this software
package and if so, what they thought of it; if you've had problems with
it, if it seems to really encrypt everything as it says, does it encrypt
the initial login information, etc.

If it does what it says it looks like a great encryption software suite!

Thank you for any help you can give.  Please respond by email also;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank you!
-Bart


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPP over SONET?
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 01:03:39 GMT

Dear Sir: I would like to connect my Linux box with a Cisco router via an
interface named PPP over Sonet(155Mb/s). But I can not find any products
which can work with my Linux box on its PCI interface.

Does somebody know who can offer such card? Better with driver.
If there is no such card, can somebody tell me the chipsets?

Thanks a lot!
My e-mail address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Zhang Lei

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Question about SNP
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 19:54:35 -0800

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Hi,
> 
> I was asked to look for a package that could handle encrypting telnet and
> ftp sessions.  After searching around, I found something called SNP,
> Secure Network Protocol (V 0.91) at ftp.csie.nctu.edu.tw/pub/CSIE/snp
> 
> It looks like the ideal solution for what we want to use it for; however,
> I don't have any networking analysis hardware (or software) to see if it
> contains anything that shouldn't be there or if it works as it is being
> advertised.
> 
> I was wondering if anyone else out there has ever used this software
> package and if so, what they thought of it; if you've had problems with
> it, if it seems to really encrypt everything as it says, does it encrypt
> the initial login information, etc.
> 
> If it does what it says it looks like a great encryption software suite!
> 
> Thank you for any help you can give.  Please respond by email also;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thank you!
> -Bart
> 
> 
I haven't used SNP.

I do use SSH (secure shell) though and find it quite good.

Luca
-- 
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: Paul Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Alias + DHCP
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 11:46:23 +1100

The DHCP server we're using (crappy Novell, I don't have any control over this) has a 
DB that assigns the same IP address to the computer as long as the name is the same.  
So the IP address wouldn't change each time I booted. (this was my concern with the 
primary IP address)

So I'm just wondering if there is a way to extend this to IP Aliasing.

Paul

Joerg Klaas wrote:

> I don't have an answer for you, but
> your idea seems very weird to me... (except you want to use this for your
> own test's only)
> How could people connect to your virtual www server if it has probably
> after each reboot different IP addresses? (I don't even start talking about
> IP-DNS mapping...)
>
> Joerg
>
> Paul Lim wrote:
>
> > I've got a Linux box running on our intranet and I wanted to use IP
> > aliasing to create a couple of virtual servers on this machine.  I
> > currently use DHCP to get my primary IP address, is it possible to get
> > more than one IP address from the DHCP server? (i.e. for eth0:0, eth0:1
> > etc)
> >
> > If anyone has any tips about setting up Apache with virtual servers
> > they'd be MUCH appreciated. :)
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Paul


------------------------------

From: "Craig C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slow Telnet
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 20:53:51 -0600

It takes 45-60 seconds for a successful telnet from my NT into my (RedHat)
linux box.  When I loaded Caldera there is no delay.  Could someone help me
with this?
Thank You [EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to