Linux-Networking Digest #154, Volume #10          Tue, 9 Feb 99 07:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: Netscape crashes on mailto: links ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  TV under Linux ("Jochen Klein")
  Re: Kernel 2.2.1 gethostbyaddr() failing for local names ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  What is a winmodem (Tester)
  ANNOUNCE? DRAFT 'Home Networking HOWTO' (scott fagg)
  Newbie:LAN setup advice needed ("Christopher J. Mark")
  Re: ppp help (Clifford Kite)
  Re: ABR V.S. UBR (in ATM) (David De Ridder)
  Re: Configuring Linux on a permanent (not PPP) Connection to Internet (irado furioso)
  IP Aliasing Problem ("Henry")
  Re: Sendmail as an internet email server (Andrzej Filip)
  Problem with RH5.2 and ISDN (David Rolling)
  DNS then NMB (Wayne Parrott)
  Environment variable that shows current PPP address? ("Brady")
  Webphone ("Austin Wilson")
  Re: Red Hat 5.2 PPP connects but doesn't route (netstat hangs) (Andrzej Filip)
  Re: Romote "root" login (Rob S. Wolfram)
  Re: Get ethernet address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  redhat/win95 network set up ("Ron")
  Re: Problem with RH5.2 and ISDN (Andrzej Filip)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,ucd.comp.questions,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Netscape crashes on mailto: links
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 10:02:05 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Jianmang Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got the same problem.
>
> Pete wrote:
>
> > Hello internet,
> >
> > I'm running Netscape Communicator 4.5 on a Redhat 5.1 machine.  Everytime I
> > click on a mailto: link, netscape crashes and dies.  I've met one other
> > person who experiences this problem.
> >
> > Does anybody understand why Netscape is choking on the mailto links and
> > know how to fix this problem?
> >

The solution : go to  ftp://update.redhat.com i'ts because you use the libc6
and netscape communicator is compiled with libc5 bientot, netscape
communicator 5 ...

> > Pete
> >
> > --
> > Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
> > Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
> >
-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-+-+-=><=-
> >   Do you hate spam?   Join the Coalition Against UCE at http://www.cauce.org
> >      Check out my homepage: http://landau.ucdavis.edu/psalzman/index.html
> >   I  BOYCOTT  ANY  COMPANY  THAT  USES  MASS  ADVERTISING  ON  THE  INTERNET
>
>

"L'essentiel est invisible " Saint-ex'

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: "Jochen Klein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TV under Linux
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 11:09:32 +0100

Could I use my WIN_TV Hauppauge card under Linux?




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.1 gethostbyaddr() failing for local names
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 10:12:09 GMT

In article <79f4ke$v83$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Sorry if this has been covered before, but after upgrading to 2.2.1
> all local host names in /etc/hosts are no longer being resolved.
> I have upgraded to net-tools 1.50, but this doesn't fix the problem.
> gethostbyaddr() times out and cannot resolve names listed in /etc/hosts
> Any ideas?

It turns out that the answer was to create an /etc/host.conf file
containing:

order hosts,bind
multi on

I hope this helps anyone else having the same problems! :)

--
Owain Vaughan     | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PO Box 155        | City and County of Newport
Newport NP20 6YX  | Casnewydd am byth

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: Tester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What is a winmodem
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 16:31:24 -0800

I heard that if you have a winmodem you cannot use Linux for PPP.  How
can I determine if I have a winmodem and what is a winmodem?  I'm trying
to set up PPP using Linuxconf, but am not succeeding.  I believe the
problem lies with the modem configuration.
Thank you,
-Wilson


------------------------------

From: scott fagg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ANNOUNCE? DRAFT 'Home Networking HOWTO'
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 20:40:24 +1000

I am trying to draft a HOWTO to cover the basic of pieceing together a
home network based aroud a linux 'server'. AFter seeing numerous 'how do
i ...' questions centering around connecting linux/95/nt machines on a
home network, i thought there might be a need for something like this.

The ground i was considering covering was:

Linux server:
  file serving (samba)
  mail server (pop + sendmail + fetchmail)
  internet gateway (firewalling, ip_masq)
  dns caching

Clients (to take advantage of filesharing, mail, web, ftp, dns, etc)
  DOS
  Win3x
  Win95
  WinNT
  OS/2
  Mac

I've pieced together a very rought draft full of holes and missing
sections, which can be spotted online at:

http://www.powerup.com.au/~sfagg

Currently it's getting update rather randomly.

For this to succeed i need:

1. encouragement
2. feedback
3. volunteers (for the mac, os/2  and perhaps dos clients)
4. some one to check my work

Any takers?
Is this all covered in existing FAQs/HOWTOs?
Anypoint in this?
Any potential audience?


-- 
=========================
remove the PAM from my email address to mail me...
=========================

------------------------------

From: "Christopher J. Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Newbie:LAN setup advice needed
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 01:37:03 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi all:
I'm a relative Newbie, having only installed Linux (SuSE 5.3) in the
past month. I'm starting to get comfortable with it now, and would like
to start experimenting with networking. The problem is, I have all kinds
of old, weird hardware, and need some advice on which would be the best
way to approach it. 

I have Linux running on 2 machines now: a Pentium 133 w/16 MB of RAM,
and a 486/33 with 20 MB. I also have a Toshiba 486/75 laptop (8 MB) and
could cobble together a 386 (up to 8 MB, maybe) out of spare parts. I'd
rather not start messing with the Pentium (my main box, and if I screw
it up, I'm up a creek) until I have a pretty good idea of what I'm
doing. I also have 3 ISA Ethernet cards (2 Etherlink III and one
Etherlink II) I could install. 

I'd be most comfortable setting the 486 up as the server and linking one
of the other boxes to it as a client. I have about a GB of disk space to
play with there, and considerably less on the other 2. 

Problem #1: Installation. The Toshiba has a really off-brand PCMCIA 2x
CD-ROM. I bought it overseas and can't even find Win95 drivers for it.
The company that made it (TXC) has no web presence as far as I've been
able to determine. The DOS drivers are made by Oak Technologies and when
I wrote them, they said to contact the OEM. The 386 wouldn't have any
CD-ROM at all, and at best two 40 MB HD's. 

Am I better off trying to get the CD-ROM working on the Toshiba, or
installing a minimal Linux from floppies on either box and then doing
the rest over a network connection? I could be willing to spring for a
PCMCIA NIC for the Toshiba, but don't want to spend any more until I
know what I'm doing (and what I want to do in the near future). 

I also have a SyQuest EZflyer 230 MB parallel port drive. I could try to
do an installation off that too, but they filed Chap. 11 in Nov. so
tech. support there isn't going to be too easy to come by. I haven't
even tried to get it mounted on either of the working boxes yet. 

This is getting a little long, so I'll hold other problems for a future
post.

An e-mail repy would be appreciated as I don't get onto the newsgroups
as often as I'd like. 


-- 
Christopher J. Mark
Mathematician, Tutor, and Webpage designer
http://www.math.umd.edu/~cjm    
"Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana."

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp help
Date: 26 Jan 1999 09:32:16 -0600

Minh Giang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: ok, here are some more info:

: This is what setserial said:

: /dev/modem, Line 2, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x03e8, IRQ: 4
:  Baud_base: 115200, close_delay: 50, divisor: 0
:  closing_wait: 3000, closing_wait2: infinte
:  Flags: spd_vhi skip_test

This looks good.

: my /var/log/debug file

: Jan 25 20:38:15 localhost last message repeated 9 times
: Jan 25 20:43:19 localhost pppd[545]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic
: 0xab8fa9cb> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 25 20:43:46 localhost last message repeated 9 times
: Jan 25 20:54:07 localhost pppd[616]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic
: 0xedc1a432> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 25 20:54:34 localhost last message repeated 9 times

The ISP is not responding in any way to the initial LCP requests and
pppd is timing out after 10 attempts to start negotiations.  The most
reasonable conclusion is that the ISP is no longer connected by the
time pppd starts sending the LCP negotiation messages.  This is usually
because the ISP is not getting what it needs from the chat script, or is
getting something that causes it to disconnect shortly after connecting.

It also may be possible that something else is wrong and the ISP is
waiting for something from you to get started.  Are you sure that the ISP
uses PAP rather than a login/password?  Again - did you try CONNECT '\c' ?
Two other things you might try instead of CONNECT '' are CONNECT '\d' and
CONNECT '\d\c'.

Come to think of it you haven't posted any chat messages, are you sure
the modem is dialing out?  Or dialing the correct number?

Here is a chat script that I've used to connect to my ISP that is similar
to yours.

exec /usr/sbin/chat -v                                 \
       TIMEOUT         3                               \
       ABORT           BUSY                            \
       ABORT           'NO ANSWER'                     \
       ''              ATZ                             \
       'OK-+++\c-OK'   ATH0                            \
       TIMEOUT         30                              \
       OK              ATDT$TELEPHONE                  \
       CONNECT         '\c'

The ATZ resets the modem to a user configured profile.  You could also
try replacing ATZ with 'AT&F&C1&D2', which most modems should accept.

: my /var/log/message file

: Jan 25 20:52:56 localhost pppd[616]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
: Jan 25 20:54:06 localhost pppd[616]: Serial connection established.
: Jan 25 20:54:07 localhost pppd[616]: Using interface ppp0
: Jan 25 20:54:07 localhost pppd[616]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
: Jan 25 20:54:37 localhost pppd[616]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
: Jan 25 20:55:26 localhost pppd[616]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
: Jan 25 20:55:26 localhost pppd[616]: Modem hangup
: Jan 25 20:55:26 localhost pppd[616]: Connection terminated.
: Jan 25 20:55:27 localhost pppd[616]: Exit.

You remarked in your first post

What's wrong???? please help a very frustrated man

and I'm beginning to see why. :/  I'm just unable to come up with any more
suggestions.


--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                       Not a guru. (tm)
/* 97.3% of all statistics are made up. */

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David De Ridder)
Subject: Re: ABR V.S. UBR (in ATM)
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 07:58:10 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


>Hi,
>What is the difference between ABR and UBR traffic?
>Why do we need UBR if we already have ABR traffic?

 UBR offers *no QoS*. ABR also gives a guarantee
 concerning cell loss probablity (which does not mean
 that it cannot occur).
 
>The books said that the parameters required to specify
>an ABR service are Minimum Cell Rate (MCR) and PCR which
>is necessary to limit the peak cell-rate. If so, it seems
>that the ABR service just likes CBR service!?

 CBR _guarantees_ PCR and CDVT. ABR _requires_
 PCR, MCR and CDVT as attributes for the traffic
 contract, but (obviously) doesn't guarantee PCR.
 Also, congestion is (and therefore cell delay and loss)
 an issue to have in mind when using ABR.

 Hope that helps,

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
  David 'Septimus' De Ridder       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

"- Do you think this show constitutes cruelty to animals ?
 - Not unless their watching it !"
   - 'The Muppet Show' 

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
  

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (irado furioso)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Configuring Linux on a permanent (not PPP) Connection to Internet
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:30:38 GMT


in delirium, after doing some "strange" smoke in a small pipe,  "dgap"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> keyed this:


>Hi, there...
>
>
>I need some info on how to configure Linux to stay connected to the Internet
>via a permanent connection (not PPP).
>

Proxy HOWTO, IpMasquerading HOWTO, Firewall (mini??) HOWTO. Also
ISP-hookup howto can be of help.

best regards,

Irado Furioso Com Tudo
There are more crimes under religious consciousness than under atheism



------------------------------

From: "Henry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Aliasing Problem
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 02:10:57 GMT

I am having a problem with IP aliasing on my external NIC card.  It appears
to work on my internal network just fine, but I am unable to reach the
Aliased interface from the outside world.  It seems that it can function
properly as I did some sniffing of my external link up to router and am
seeing the proper ARP traffic being passed back and forth.
I have my box locked down using IPFWADM and have even tried to disable it
but still had the same results.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Henry



------------------------------

From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail as an internet email server
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 12:03:32 +0100

Manoli Kokologiannakis wrote:

> Can somebody help me setup sendmail as an email server that can be used
> on the internet using pop3 clients such as Netscape Mail and Outlook.

Sendmail is not a pop3/imap4 server. It just delivers email to mailboxes
and exchanges email with the rest of the world.
You need another program to access the mailboxes via pop3/imap4.

--
"Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warsaw, Poland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (backup)


------------------------------

From: David Rolling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with RH5.2 and ISDN
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 21:11:01 -0500

I need assistance/direction on setting up a Red Hat 5.2 server behind a
ISDN router (Ascend Pipeline 25).

My goal is to have the RH5.2 box acting as a firewall, DHCP server,
local DNS server, print server, home web server, email server and SAMBA
server on a 4 computer network in my home. Because I get billed on a per
call basis after my first 200 calls, I want to limit unnecessary
connections.  Below find what I successfully completed and my specific
problem.

Problem
    After setting up my Linux server I was shocked with a hefty
telephone bill.  I get 200 free local calls and $.08 per call after that
from Ameritech (local telephone company). My ISP (ameritech.net) allows
me approx. 80 hours per month of connect time with the "Unlimited" plan,
so I can not have a permanent connection.  The Linux server configured
with the services below (DHCP & SAMBA), the network established a
connect approximately every 15 minutes.  I didn't notice for the first 3
weeks.  This cost me big time!  Now I must keep the Linux server turned
off until I solve this problem.  I only turn it on to set DHCP resources
once a week.

Current RH5.2 setup
    Hardware
        Intel P-90 (Tyan motherboard)
        NEC 4x4 CD-ROM Changer
        Intel EtherExpress 10Base-T NIC
        Generic Trident video card
        Logitech serial mouse
    Software
        DHCP server
        SAMBA server/client

Other hardware on the network:
    (2) Intel P-120 (Tyan motherboards)
         Intel EtherExpress PRO 10/100Base-T
        Windows 98 PCs
    NetGear 10/100Base-T 8 port hub
    NetGear 10Base-T 4 port hub
    Ascend Pipeline 25 ISDN router

I'm hoping someone can suggest configuration changes to enable continues
operation of the Linux box without unnecessary ISP connections.

David Rolling
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wayne Parrott)
Subject: DNS then NMB
Date: 9 Feb 99 01:20:52 GMT

Hi
 Just wondering if there is any way to make linux lookup an IP on a WINS 
server if there is no name is found with nslookup.

thanks 
 Wayne

------------------------------

From: "Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Environment variable that shows current PPP address?
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 04:06:36 GMT

Is there an environment variable that I can use with echo to tell me the
current ip of the host??

Brady



------------------------------

From: "Austin Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux
Subject: Webphone
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 22:11:02 +1100

Hi

I am trying to use webphone from Win95 through a linux box to the internet.
The Win95 box is ip masqueraded to the linux box.  I can call people and
they can hear me but I cannot hear them.  Also they cannot call me.  What do
I need to do to get it to work??

Regards
Austin



------------------------------

From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Red Hat 5.2 PPP connects but doesn't route (netstat hangs)
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 12:07:44 +0100

"William E. Rushman" wrote:

> When activated, the (28.8) modem dials out and makes a connection. I can see
> the ppp0 device in ifconfig, and I can ping the address assigned by the ISP.
> The assigned address looks good (the first two octets match the ISP).
> No default route exists, before or after the connection, even though the
> config says to set default on the ppp connect. netstat -r hangs. I tried
> setting the default route manually, but nothing changes even though the
> route command doesn't return an error.
>
> My goal is to do dial-on-demand and masq, but first I need to get a
> connection.
> Any ideas? Anybody seen a good doc for this for 5.2?

* netstat -r hangs
run "netstat -nr" to avoid DNS lookups.

* default route
add default route to routes served by ppp0
( redhat, X windows, control-panel program)
--
"Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warsaw, Poland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (backup)



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob S. Wolfram)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,nl.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Romote "root" login
Date: 8 Feb 1999 06:53:06 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:43:08 GMT, Vikram.V.Asrani wrote:
>In comp.os.linux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> => /etc/sudoers controls which user may use su IIRC, so that means that you can
> => effecively make another wall you'll have to overcome before you even become
> => root.
>
>  I tried that but it does not seem to work. Anything that I missed
>  out. All I wrote in the file was the name of the user who is allowed
>  to use su and then I tried running su from someone not listed in
>  that file. This succeeded in making me root . 

Actually, the way to restrict su access is to change the value for
"SU_WHEEL_ONLY" to yes in /etc/login.defs and include all users to
be allowed to su to root in the group 0 (root).

HTH,
Rob
-- 
Rob S. Wolfram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  PGP 0x07606049
   One question: How come the .44 magnum is the worlds only usable point and 
   click interface?
                -- Alan Cox


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Get ethernet address
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 10:55:40 GMT

In comp.os.linux.development.system [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!

> Does anybody know how to get the ethernet address of a network card in a C
> program on Linux? I have code that does it on Solaris but unfortunately all
> the header files needed aren't there on Linux.

ioctl() with SIOCGIFHWADDR on an inet socket. See linux/sockios.h for the
definitions.

------------------------------

From: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: redhat/win95 network set up
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:08:47 -0800

Im new to networking. Im trying to set up a peer to peer network between a
Redhat 5.2 system and a win95 system. The network cards are installed and
appear to be working(each system is able to ping itself, however they cant
ping each other) I think the problem lies in the net configuration of the
Domain name. How do you determine (or set) the Domain name for win95 and the
Linux? I cant find any reference on the domain name of the win95 system.

for the win95 I have
computer name: winaaa
workgroup: one
description: office

for Redhat I have
host: linaaa.local.com
domain: local.com

any direction would be appreciated.



------------------------------

From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem with RH5.2 and ISDN
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 12:14:05 +0100

wait for such connection nd than run
tcpdump -vli ppp0
to see what goes via you line

Quick fix:
Configure your router to start connections only
when outgoing tcp connection is requested to
a few carefully chosen destinations
(IP address & port)

--
"Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warsaw, Poland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (backup)


David Rolling wrote:

> I need assistance/direction on setting up a Red Hat 5.2 server behind a
> ISDN router (Ascend Pipeline 25).
>
> My goal is to have the RH5.2 box acting as a firewall, DHCP server,
> local DNS server, print server, home web server, email server and SAMBA
> server on a 4 computer network in my home. Because I get billed on a per
> call basis after my first 200 calls, I want to limit unnecessary
> connections.  Below find what I successfully completed and my specific
> problem.
>
> Problem
>     After setting up my Linux server I was shocked with a hefty
> telephone bill.  I get 200 free local calls and $.08 per call after that
> from Ameritech (local telephone company). My ISP (ameritech.net) allows
> me approx. 80 hours per month of connect time with the "Unlimited" plan,
> so I can not have a permanent connection.  The Linux server configured
> with the services below (DHCP & SAMBA), the network established a
> connect approximately every 15 minutes.  I didn't notice for the first 3
> weeks.  This cost me big time!  Now I must keep the Linux server turned
> off until I solve this problem.  I only turn it on to set DHCP resources
> once a week.
>
> Current RH5.2 setup
>     Hardware
>         Intel P-90 (Tyan motherboard)
>         NEC 4x4 CD-ROM Changer
>         Intel EtherExpress 10Base-T NIC
>         Generic Trident video card
>         Logitech serial mouse
>     Software
>         DHCP server
>         SAMBA server/client
>
> Other hardware on the network:
>     (2) Intel P-120 (Tyan motherboards)
>          Intel EtherExpress PRO 10/100Base-T
>         Windows 98 PCs
>     NetGear 10/100Base-T 8 port hub
>     NetGear 10Base-T 4 port hub
>     Ascend Pipeline 25 ISDN router
>
> I'm hoping someone can suggest configuration changes to enable continues
> operation of the Linux box without unnecessary ISP connections.
>
> David Rolling
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to