Linux-Networking Digest #161, Volume #10 Wed, 10 Feb 99 00:13:49 EST
Contents:
Active server pages and Apache running on linux. ("Aaron Saikovski")
Help me optimize my ppp server (Kyler Jones)
ipchains no www access (Chris Funk)
Cannot login problem (Yusseri Yusoff)
RedHat 5.2 alternate port telnet problem ("D. Bingham Brown")
Re: Linux --> Company NT RAS - Can it be done? (Tim Lines)
Re: Please help w/muliple NICs (Rick Onanian)
Kernel Build Failure (Cary Wagner)
Re: Please refer a LINUX Hacker to me (Frank Sweetser)
Re: Help, ISP setup! (DM)
ipportfw/ipalias/error: setsockopt failed (Rick Onanian)
Re: demand dialing with pppd (Clifford Kite)
help needed for PCMCIA ethernet (Martin van Nijnatten)
Re: upgrade to 2.2.0 (Darrell Tangman)
Re: ppp problem (chap) (Clifford Kite)
Re: problem with chat script (Clifford Kite)
Re: Please Help, ISP setup! (Clifford Kite)
inetd error in /var/log/messages (Joel Shellman)
Re: Samba and Win for WG 3.11 (Max Jerome)
Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG (Joel Shellman)
Re: Need Help RH5.2, Lans and Dialup Internet Access (David Goldstein)
Re: Please help w/muliple NICs (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: Newbie networking question (Rob Hafernik)
Re: inetd error in /var/log/messages (Neil Rickert)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Aaron Saikovski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Active server pages and Apache running on linux.
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 14:08:42 +1100
Is it possible to run microsoft's active server page technology on a linux
box using apache..or do we still
have to use good old NT for that?
Thanks,
Aaron
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 10:42:55 -0500
From: Kyler Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help me optimize my ppp server
Hi! I'm trying to rework my serial/ppp setup because my ppp, dial
in server just isn't working the way I'd like. Mostly, there
are problems with slow access (seems to slow down the longer the
user is online) and getting disconnected a lot.
Also, compression never works (as far as I know - maybe there is
compression being used besides what the kernel reports as disabled?).
Now, I'm not saying that my server is unusable, just that I know for
sure that it isn't quite right. I have tested a friends machine
dialing into another ISP and it's definitely faster and more
reliable.
The main usage of my server is as an ip masquerading host to provide
internet for some friends, etc..
Here is my setup:
Redhat 5.2
kernel 2.2.1
seterial 2.15 (latest)
ppp 2.3.5 (latest)
glibc (of course)
getty_ps 2.0.7j (latest)
USR Sportster 33.6 Internal (16550A UART)
I only just recently move to Redhat, but I had all the same issues
with Slackware.
I've upgraded all the packages in the /Documentation/Changes file
that came with the 2.2.1 kernel.
Here's my config files (everything I can think of):
1. The pertinent part of /etc/inittab:
s1:345:respawn:/sbin/uugetty ttyS1 38400 vt100
2. The pertinent part of /etc/ppp/options:
asyncmap 0
crtscts
lock
modem
proxyarp
3. My /etc/default/uugetty.ttyS1 file:
CLEAR = NO
HANGUP=YES
#DEBUG=777
DEBUG=010
INIT="" ATS0=1\r OK
########ALTLOCK=cua1
ALTLOCK=modem
ALTLINE=ttyS1
#WAITFOR=RING
#CONNECT="" ATs0=1\r CONNECT \s\A
TIMEOUT=60
4. Here is the script executed by dialin users to start ppp:
#!/bin/sh
# ppplogin - script to fire up pppd on login
mesg n
stty -echo
exec /usr/sbin/pppd -detach silent modem crtscts
5. Here is some stuff I have in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local:
/sbin/modprobe ppp
/sbin/modprobe bsd_comp
/sbin/modprobe ppp_deflate
/bin/setserial /dev/ttyS1 spd_hi
6. I'm using the stock /etc/gettydefs that came with redhat (seems to be
the same as Slackware, has entries for all speeds, etc.).
7. (Finally) Here is the syslog info from /var/log/messages:
pppd[1122]: pppd 2.3.5 started by mo, uid 1007
Feb 8 20:21:40 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 8 20:21:40 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Feb 8 20:21:45 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: CCP terminated by peer
Feb 8 20:21:45 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Compression disabled by peer.
Feb 8 20:21:48 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Cannot determine ethernet address
for proxy ARP
Feb 8 20:21:48 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: local IP address 192.168.0.1
Feb 8 20:21:48 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: remote IP address 192.168.0.5
Feb 8 20:29:19 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Feb 8 20:29:19 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Modem hangup
Feb 8 20:29:19 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Connection terminated.
Feb 8 20:29:19 Mirkwood pppd[1122]: Exit.
Feb 8 20:29:22 Mirkwood kernel: Use of setserial/setrocket to set
SPD_* flags is deprecated
Feb 8 20:29:30 Mirkwood last message repeated 2 times
First of all, I know about the rpoxyarp crap, why it isn't working and
that
I really don't need it. I'm just too lazy to change it.
Second, I've played around quite a bit with slower speeds in inittab and
with the speed flags in setserial, nothing seems to change.
The compression modules are being loaded in my rc.local because I don't
believe the kernel was finding them. T kept getting "can't find module
"compression" or something. I can't remember now. It only started when
I upgraded tp kernel 2.2.1.
Also, the last 2 lines in messages are new with 2.2.1. Is this a
problem?
Is the spd_hi flag being discarded? The Documentation/Changes file said
to upgrade to the latetst setserial , and I did.
One last thing: Is there a way to determine (from my end) what connect
speed was actually established? On the other end, it seems to be
random, and funny speeds too (like 26,800, stuff like that) although
sometimes it's normal. It varies from time to time and from computer
to computer.
Anyways, thanks in advance for any help you can give. It's definitely
appreciated.
In your debt,
Kyler Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 20:43:05 -0700
From: Chris Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains no www access
Hi,
I am setting up ip masq. on 2.2.1 . Machine 1 (192.168.0.1) ppp link
to isp.
Machine 2 is a win98 box (192.168.0.2).
I issue the command ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.0.2/32 -j MASQ -t
0x01 0x10 -i ppp0
When I go to the win98 machine, I can ping any internet address fine. I
can also telnet to the internet.
But when I try to use the broswer, all I get is "host contacted waiting
for reply" then it times out with a cannot connect to host error.
Gateway on machine 2 is set to 192.168.0.1 and IE is not using any proxy
settings.
What am I missing?
Thanks
ChrisI
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yusseri Yusoff)
Subject: Cannot login problem
Date: 9 Feb 1999 10:32:54 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hullo,
Posted this at c.o.l.x lastnight before figuring that it ain't exactly an X
problem. Anyhow:
My machine seems to have developed a problem overnight. I can't seem to log
in all of a sudden. I'm running xdm on Slackware 3.4, kernel 2.0.33, XFree
3.3.2. It was OK on Saturday but seems to have conked out on Sunday and has
been reticent ever since.
Anyway, the machine is networked to the dept. system. It didn't give me
this problem before. Basically what happens is that I'd log in, just about
see a glimpse of my console, xterms, biffs, etc. and get logged out
again. I checked the .xsession-errors file and here's what I've got:
Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server
Fvwm-95: in function main: <<ERROR>> can't open display :0
I've checked my .xsession, .cshrc, .login files and I didn't change any of
it recently. Strangely enough, I have no problem logging on to Solaris 2.4,
DEC Alphas or Redhat 5.1 machines, but I do get the same log in/log out
results from Solaris 2.5.1 machines.
I know I should ask my sysadmin, but he's gone off to the Caribbean (no,
I'm not kidding, and he deserves it too). Any ideas, anybody? What did I
break?
Cheers.
Yus
--
After a year in therapy, my psychiatrist said to me,
"Maybe life isn't for everyone."
- Larry Brown
------------------------------
From: "D. Bingham Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 5.2 alternate port telnet problem
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 22:40:54 -0500
(Running 2.0.36 kernel, nothing other than the basic installation
added on the system)
Simply put, I need to run in.telnetd on a port other than 23.
First, I just added "telnet 3050/tcp" to /etc/services,
stopped and restarted inet services. This failed to work.
Next, I changed that to "telnet2 3050/tcp", and added
a line to /etc/inetd.conf mirroring the current telnet line,
stopped and restarted inet, no avail.
In both cases, I can connect to the machine remotely via port
3050, but I receive no login. I've tried forcing my telnet
client to enter character mode as well -- still no luck.
The Linux guru who has been helping me is stumped as well --
the above procedures work fine on his 5.1 machine, but he has
the same problem on his 5.2 machine.
Any help _greatly_ appreciated.
Bingham Brown
------------------------------
From: Tim Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Linux --> Company NT RAS - Can it be done?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 03:39:49 +0000
>
Exchange does SMTP as well.
>
> Exchange does POP3, too.
>
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Please help w/muliple NICs
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 10:41:29 -0500
Cecil Watson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problem configuring multiple NIC under RedHat 5.2. I can
>
> get both of them recognized, but can only ping one at a time?! I must
> disable one, ping the other disable,enable the first them I can ping
> it?! I'm trying to enable IP masquerading, I've read the How-Tos but
> cannot find and answer. Thanks in advance,
>
> cesman
If the Multiple-Ethernet howto doesn't answer your question, than the one
bit of information it's missing is prolly what you need: In order to get two
ethernet cards of the same type working, you must compile them into the
kernel rather than as modules. This has been my experience. Once I did that,
everything got easier.. Then you just follow the multiple-ethernet howto.
rick
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cary Wagner)
Subject: Kernel Build Failure
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 03:40:36 GMT
I am trying to compile my first kernel. I have a RH 5.1 (2.0.35)
installation that I did straight from CD. All went well! Now, I want
to upgrade the kernel AND add support for some items that were not
included modules when I initially installed. Here are the steps that
I have taken:
make mrproper <--- Tried with and without this
make menuconfig
make dep
make clean
make bzImage AND make zImage
Here is the last screen of info that shows up:
>make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/arch/i386/boot/compressed'
>gcc -I//usr/src/linux-2.0.36/include -O2 -DSTDC_HEADERS -o xtract xtract.c
>gcc -I//usr/src/linux-2.0.36/include -O2 -DSTDC_HEADERS -o piggyback piggyback.c
>./xtract /usr/src/linux-2.0.36/vmlinux | gzip -9 | ./piggyback > piggy.o
>Non-GCC header of 'system'
>Compressed size 20
>gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I//usr/src/linux-2.0.36/include -traditional -c head.S
>gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I//usr/src/linux-2.0.36/include -O2 _DSTDC_HEADERS -c misc.c -o
>misc.o
>ld -qmagic -Ttext 0xfffe0 -o bvmlinux head.o misc.o piggy.o
>ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 000fffe0
>misc.o(.text+0x1bd8): undefined reference to 'input_data'
>misc.o(.text+0x1bdd): undefined reference to 'input_len'
>misc.o(.text+0x1bf3): undefined reference to 'input_data'
>make[2]: *** [bvmlinux] Error 1
>make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/arch/i386/boot/compressed'
>make[1]: *** [compressed/bvmlinux] Error 2
>make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-2.0.36/arch/i386/boot'
>make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
I am getting extremely frustrated as nothing I have found online OR in
books talks about this kind of error. And, no one online seems to be
able to help.
Thank you in advance for any and all help!
Cary
------------------------------
From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Please refer a LINUX Hacker to me
Date: 09 Feb 1999 22:34:07 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> We're looking for at least one Linux hacker to join the NERSC PC Cluster
> Project, whose purpose is to develop the infrastructure for
> full-featured "plug-and-play" PC clusters for scientific
> computing. Activities include development of cluster infrastructure such
http://www.beowulf.org/
--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.1 i586 | at public servers
Suppose you're working on an optimizer to render \X unnecessary (or
rather, redundant, which isn't the same thing in my book).
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DM)
Crossposted-To:
comp.protocols.ppp,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Help, ISP setup!
Date: 10 Feb 1999 03:59:06 GMT
I had the same problem in winNT netscape.
Try entering the IP NUMBER (ie. 141.114.22.12) not the name
(ie.proxy.state.as.us) of the proxy in the Netscape advanced options.
You'd think it wouldn't matter
This worked for me.
Make sure that you know the proper port that the proxy is using too.
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipportfw/ipalias/error: setsockopt failed
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 11:12:16 -0500
I'm attempting to set up ipportfw (Port Forwarding) to redirect incoming
connections.
I have using Debian 2.0 with kernel 2.0.36 compiled a few differant ways
(I can choose which kernel from LILO at boot time).
1. What are my other options, rather than ipportfw? Are any better?
2. When attempting to use ipportfw, I get the following error:
ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Protocol not available
I have all the firewalling and ip options compiled into the kernel, and
IP Masquerading works beautifully for basic outgoing stuff. I'd like to
set up port forwarding, either to direct specific incoming connections
to specific machines, or to direct ALL incoming connections to one other
machine, or a combination of both (most probably the last of the three).
3. On a somewhat differant subject... I have heard of using one network
card and IP aliasing to have two networks on one card. What security
risks are involved, exactly, and is there any detriment to speed? I have
very little traffic.
thanks,
rick
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: demand dialing with pppd
Date: 28 Jan 1999 17:29:48 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Thank you Simon. And thank you Clifford Kite.
: I've been fighting this problem for a while (admitted longer than I should
: have been). I had figured out that the ppp.c was not getting copied and that
: was the problem. I hadn't gone so far as to determine the fix.
: I decided to take one last look through DejaNews before I was going to post a
: "what's the next step" email.
That's the way it's supposed to work!
Just wish it happened that way more often.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Better is the enemy of good enough. */
------------------------------
From: Martin van Nijnatten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: help needed for PCMCIA ethernet
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 17:22:01 +0100
- Compaq Armada 1700
- TDK Global networker 3410 PCMCIA (ethernet + modem)
- slackware, kernel 2.0.34
- pcmcia-cs 3.0.0.
Cardservices are loaded correctly but the network card isn't recognized.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Martin
------------------------------
From: Darrell Tangman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: upgrade to 2.2.0
Date: 9 Feb 1999 16:22:12 GMT
Jayasuthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am planing to move to 2.2.0 from 2.0.36, Have few thing required to
> confirm before this upgrade take place within a week.
> 1. I will be compiling kernel from other machice... do I need to
> transfer System.map file with kernel ? and can System.map file for
> 2.2.0 work with 2.0.36
> which I have few kernel for backup incase server dies..
Yes. No. System.map gives the external symbols defined by the kernel;
it can't be shared between two different kernels unless they happen to
have exactly the same set of external symbols and all of them happen to
be at exactly the same address. If you put the 2.0.36 System.map in the
root directory and the 2.2.0 System.map in /boot or /usr/src/linux, the
kernel will be able to find the right one at boot time.
> 2. Version 6, samba server error message what version is this I am using
> samba 2.** something. <- This message shotup during smbmount ->.
Not a clue -- I don't use samba. However the Changes file says that
smbmount must be built using the kernel 2.2.x headers to work with a
2.2.x kernel, so you may need to rebuild samba.
> 3. I found some program missing went I do testing with 2.2.0 went issue
> "ps ax".
> I upgrading because I found kernel 2.2.0 is very great for low end 486
> server that I have. Responce time is great. What application running on
> my server is
> 1. mail server using sendmail
> 2. samba server
> 3. nfs server
> 4. apache server.
> 5. shell account
> 6. ftp server
> 7. I don't remember what else !
> How about this application all. Will it work with 2.2.0 .... please
> direct me if there is homepage infor on 2.2.0 upgrading. I already using
> 2.2.1 on my workstation at home but my server still using 2.0.36 . This
> upgrade consider must.
Go to /usr/src/linux/Documentation and read the Changes file -- it tells
you what programs need to be upgraded to what versions in order to run
successfully with the 2.2.x kernels. You will need to take care of item
7, at a minimum, before you can count on a successful upgrade.
--
Darrell Tangman -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Augusta, Georgia, USA
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp problem (chap)
Date: 9 Feb 1999 09:47:07 -0600
YoungSu Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I wonder why my ppp-2.2.0 doesn't work suddenly.
: it worked well until last night.
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1
: <mru 1500> <magic 0xf0b40d8> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0
: <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap msoft> <magic 0x1090> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0
: <auth chap md5>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1
: <mru 1500> <magic 0xf0b40d8> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1
: <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap msoft> <magic 0x1090> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x1
: <auth chap md5>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2
: <asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap msoft> <magic 0x1090> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Jan 23 12:14:09 darkstar pppd[89]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x2
: <auth chap md5>]
ect, ect
: my ISP said they doesn't change any setting on their server.
: I'm using slackware 3.6 with 2.0.36 kernel.
You ISP help people are apparently as clueless as most are over here. If
you were using plain CHAP then things have changed - now the ISP is using
MSCHAP. The ppp-2.2.0 source package has a patch to make pppd MSCHAP
capable in the file README.mschap80 as does the ppp-2.3.5 source package.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: problem with chat script
Date: 9 Feb 1999 09:50:44 -0600
James Gardner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I am using an external Hayes Accura 336/56k modem. I am trying to
: access Mindspring. I can send the atdt and phone number . I hear the
: modem dial and start trying to negotiate speed. My messages file tells
: me that I am waiting for Mindspring to return a CONNECT message, and I
: never get it.
: Are there any Mindspring users who can help me with this. I figure that
: either I have a modem problem and I never negotiate properly, or perhaps
: I have a chat script problem and I don't really want to wait for
: CONNECT. Any help would be much appreciated.
The most likely thing is that the chat script has a problem. You can post
it for us to look at and venture an opinion. The chat messages with the
CONNECT would also be appropriate.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To:
comp.protocols.ppp,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Please Help, ISP setup!
Date: 9 Feb 1999 10:02:14 -0600
Prasanth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Let me explain the problem. Iam having linux slackware
: distribution. My ISP has provided me with the
: following information.
: proxy server proxy.pacific.net.sg
: WWW server www.pacific.net.sg
: pop mail server name pacific.net.sg
: I have managed to set up the PPP connection with ISP. Each time i
: connect, the IP addrress of the remote is different.
: Now i wan't to go to internet.I ping proxy.pacific.net.sg in win95
: and got the ip address. Then i went to linux and configured netscape
: proxy with this ip address and tried to connect. But it cannot. In linux
: i cannot ping using name(eg proxy.pacific.net.sg)or configure netscape
: with proxy name. I also found that in win95 enviornment, for each
: session i have different ip address for proxy.pacific.net.sg. Also
: please tell me what should i put in /etc/hosts and /etc/resolv.conf and
: the /etc/HOSTNAME file, in this situation
Try putting
nameserver 192.169.33.3
in /etc/resolv.conf
and
ns.pacific.net.sg 192.169.33.3
in /etc/hosts
This is the nameserver that nslookup finds for pacific.net.sg .
: Even after succsessfully setting up the PPP with ISP, I cannot go to
: internet or read mails. PLEASE HELP ME TO SORT OUT THIS MESS.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* I gave up on politics when no matter who I voted for, I regretted it.
* -- Pepper...and Salt, WSJ */
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 21:02:37 +0000
From: Joel Shellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: inetd error in /var/log/messages
Can someone please tell me what the following error
signifies showing up in /var/log/messages quite often:
Feb 9 21:52:11 tim inetd[267]: pop3/tcp: bind: Address
already in use
I'm running (Dual PPro 200Mhz) :
RedHat 5.1 with kernel 2.2.1 installed over it.
Thank you,
--
Joel Shellman
knOcean Interactive Corporation
http://corp.knOcean.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Max Jerome )
Subject: Re: Samba and Win for WG 3.11
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 16:31:03 GMT
It is all SMB so I dont think it would be a problem,
just get a tcp/ip stack for dos/win3.1 or load load ipx on the linux
server , just make sure your using the same protocols on all machines
- I've never done this though, so I could be wrong here
On Mon, 08 Feb 1999 18:59:17 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E.
Mitton) wrote:
>
>
>OOPS!
>
>Guess I should stop reading between the lines! I HAVE NOT done this
>with Samba! TCP/IP networking only!
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton) wrote:
>
>>I use Win3.11 along with Winsock 2.0 and MASQ out through my Linux
>>dialup PPP connection at home.
>>
>>All the same instructions apply (from the MASQ How-To and any other
>>instructions you find) as for Win9x. The critical part (after Linux
>>is all set up) is that the Win3.11 network card setup must have the
>>gateway address set for the Linux gateway machine.
>>
>>I set this up at Christmas for my kids ... it has worked under Linux
>>V2.0.36, my interim update to V2.1.132(?) and now with V2.2.1 (with
>>ipchains).
>>
>>Good luck!
>
>------------------------------------------------
>The FACTS are my Employers, OPINIONS are my own!
>
>Sorry: SPAM reduction project in progress:
> Remove the "x." from my domain to reply!
>------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 21:16:17 +0000
From: Joel Shellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG
Michael Powe wrote:
> >>>>> "Bob" == Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bob> having windows. I have heard in newsgroups that GTE has
> Bob> terminated ADSL service when they found out somebody was
> Bob> running linux.
>
> Probably true and justified since they tell you up front that Windows
> is required (at least, the signup information I have seen stipulates
> as much). If you want to play games & not use Windows (after signing
> such a contract), that's fine but don't cry if you get caught.
>
> mp
Just had a thought and so I had to pipe up. Local phone
companies are government regulated entities. I know that our
local phone company does not support anything but windows
for DSL service, also. I wonder if this could have any
bearing on a Microsoft Antitrust case. If all government
regulated local phone companies were shown to restrict users
to only one operating system...
--
Joel Shellman
knOcean Interactive Corporation
http://corp.knOcean.com/
------------------------------
From: David Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Need Help RH5.2, Lans and Dialup Internet Access
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 11:14:58 -0700
Don Cook wrote:
>
> I have a small network running RH 5.2 and KDE. I can connect to my ISP from
> the network server (where the modem is) using PAP, but something must be
> messed up with the DNS configuration. I can connect, but can't ping
> addresses on the net. Ping just hangs. the ISP's DNS ip addresses are in
> /etc/resolv.conf
>
> I tried KPPP and using linux scripts to start pppd, but they both do exactly
> the same problem.
>
> My computer running Linux at home works great connected to the net through
> the same ISP. That's why I thought that the LAN configuration might be
> conflicting with the dialup connection.
>
> Ideas, solutions or suggestions?????
>
> TIA
> Don Cook
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don,
Whenever you have this problem it is because the resolv.conf file is
not correct. In the /etc/resolv.conf file place the following lines:
search _your isp_
nameserver _ip address of the isp_
Mine looks like this
search regio-info.de
nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (replace with real address)
David
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Please help w/muliple NICs
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 08:46:10 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Rick,
>
> Thanks for replying to my message in Usenet. I'm using Redhat 5.2
> supposedly you don't have to compile the kernel...But at any rate, can you point
> in the direction of a How To on doing this? Thanks in advance,
>
> cesman
>
> Rick Onanian wrote:
>
> > Cecil Watson wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm having problem configuring multiple NIC under RedHat 5.2. I can
> > >
> > > get both of them recognized, but can only ping one at a time?! I must
> > > disable one, ping the other disable,enable the first them I can ping
> > > it?! I'm trying to enable IP masquerading, I've read the How-Tos but
> > > cannot find and answer. Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > cesman
> >
> > If the Multiple-Ethernet howto doesn't answer your question, than the one
> > bit of information it's missing is prolly what you need: In order to get two
> > ethernet cards of the same type working, you must compile them into the
> > kernel rather than as modules. This has been my experience. Once I did that,
> > everything got easier.. Then you just follow the multiple-ethernet howto.
> >
> > rick
>
>
With debian, you tell the module to look for two cards in the
/etc/mod.conf file:
options ne io=0x300,0x310
not all modules support this.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Hafernik)
Subject: Re: Newbie networking question
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 22:44:40 -0600
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J
Bayuk) wrote:
<snip>
> Start by trying to narrow it down. When the problem occurs, can
> you reach out over the net by IP address?
> What error messages are you getting, say from ping?
> Any difference trying to ping a system on your local net versus
> across a router?
> What network card are you using?
No networking is working. It's exactly as if the 10baseT cord had been
unplugged. Ping gives no errors, it just doesn't get any replies. It
doesn't matter if the machine being pinged is ten feet or ten thousand
miles away.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Rickert)
Subject: Re: inetd error in /var/log/messages
Date: 9 Feb 1999 22:33:00 -0600
Joel Shellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Feb 9 21:52:11 tim inetd[267]: pop3/tcp: bind: Address
>already in use
It means that another process is listening on that port. Did you by
any chance start your pop server directly from your rc.d startup
files, without uncommenting the 'inetd' lines that start it?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
