Linux-Networking Digest #181, Volume #10 Fri, 12 Feb 99 01:13:45 EST
Contents:
Re: NetMedic for Linux? ("Wadels")
Re: Using my linux equiped adsl system as a news server (Bud Rogers)
Re: nt and samba 2.0.1 (peter)
3c509 and DSL (Wyatt Camp)
Problems with Network Setup SuSE 5.2 ("Christoph Frommen")
Re: do I need 2 ethernet cards? (Rick Onanian)
Re: IPX/PPP Client Problem (Joe Loyall)
Re: do I need 2 ethernet cards? (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: .. about security .. (Phil DeBecker)
Trouble with dip and static IP commection (Bill Cripe)
Firewall oder sonstiges ?? !HILFE! ("Armin W.")
Re: Help, ISP setup! (Kalevi Hautaniemi)
Re: PPP problems under 2.2.1 (Christian Bienia)
Re: HTTP problems using PPP (Anhtuan)
NEED HELP................ PLEASE HELP ME ("danish")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Wadels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NetMedic for Linux?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 21:45:11 GMT
I don't know what NetMedic does, but have you checked out
http://www.linuxapps.com 's networking section? Most Linux utilities are
listed in there, I expect.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<79sck2$oq6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> What's available for Linux that does net analysis like NetMedic? Other
than
>the obvious traceroute, I mean.
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using my linux equiped adsl system as a news server
Date: 10 Feb 1999 15:29:06 -0600
"Kim Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anybody point me to info on setting up my linux web server as a local
> news server?
[...]
> if I could just have the linux box regularly connect to the news server and
> download the messages and then allow me to read them from my 95 boxes
Title: leafnode
Version: 1.8
Entered-date: 13DEC98
Description: News server package for small sites.
This version fixes several bugs in leafnode-1.7.1 and
adds filtering. See CHANGES for details.
Features include: easy to install and maintain; only read
groups are downloaded; separate download of headers and
bodies possible; filtering of headers for regular expressions
Keywords: newsserver, offline, small sites, netnews
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arnt Gulbrandsen)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Markus Enzenberger)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cornelius Krasel)
Maintained-by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cornelius Krasel)
Primary-site: ftp://wpxx02.toxi.uni-wuerzburg.de/pub/
66kB leafnode-1.8.tar.gz
Alternate-site: ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/news/transport/
66kB leafnode-1.8.tar.gz
Platforms: Linux, NetBSD, possibly other Unixes as well
perl is needed for newsq
Copying-policy: MIT
--
Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
have linux, will telnet
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (peter)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking
Subject: Re: nt and samba 2.0.1
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 22:10:57 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] had the gall to state:
>
> >when using samba-1.9.18 I open networkenvironment in NT-explorer and
> >opened the workgroup and then I clicked on "samba" and then I could see
> >the services "s1" and "s2". when trying to enter these folders I was
> >forced to enter username/pass.
> >so I could browse the services with a special account (nobody, which
> >has set NO PASSWORD) before entering with the user-accounts.
>
> Try changing your smb.conf file to use "guest" instead of nobody, then make the
> password for Guest blank on Linux and NT.
>
> From a 95 machine, I deleted all of my .pwl files, and use user nobody or ftp
> for the samba share. That fixed it.
>
>
thanks, but I dont want any blank passwords on my machines and on the
other side it didnt solve my problem :(
peter
=================
pilsl@
ANTISPAM
riemann.atat.at
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 20:25:44 -0800
From: Wyatt Camp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3c509 and DSL
I was able to find a few posts of others with this same problem, but
I could find no answers to them. so:
I've been hair-pulling for a couple of weeks now trying to get a 3c509
under Redhat 5.2 to function. The very same card plays nice with my work
network (under 5.2) so I'm guessing it's something wierd with 3c509s and
Cisco 675 DSL routers.
I've turned off PnP and handed the card interrupt info through LILO as
directed in the 3c509 file at
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/3c509.html. I've also
recompiled the module from the newest driver - no dice.
I'm using a loaner tulip-based card now that works dandy, but I'd really
like to put some of those ISA slots to use (as well as this "free" card
I got from US West).
Thanks,
-W
--
Wyatt Camp
Test Engineer
Watchguard Technologies, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Christoph Frommen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with Network Setup SuSE 5.2
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 22:59:03 -0500
Hi there,
I have just installed SuSE Linux 5.2 and I'm having trouble to get my
Network support up and running.
My Ethernet card 3COM 3C509b is being detected during boot-up at 0x280 and
IRQ 10 but then I receive the message "Network unreachable" .
I have used the following settings:
IP 155.33.53.86
Subnet 255.255.255.0
Gateway 155.33.218.11
DNS 129.10.1.13 and 129.10.1.6
domain names: dac.neu.edu and neu.edu
I have checked /etc/route.conf and it seems ok. and have also tried to add
the gateway manually... but without success.
The same values and settings work fine for me under WINDOWS 95
Thanks in advance
Chris
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: do I need 2 ethernet cards?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 17:06:21 -0500
Gavin Cato wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'm going to be setting up a ipfwadm firewall for a friend soon.
>
> His cable modem uses eth0
>
> I was planning on having the internal network use eth0:1
>
> Would I need 2 network cards, or would eth0:1 be ok?
The firewall will be partially useless if you use one network card, two
IPs on that card, and a hub. This setup transmits all packets for either
network (the cable modem network or your private network) over the same
wire, making it available to packet sniffers, or so I've been told. I
asked this same question yesterday, and got pretty much that answer. :)
2 network cards is the way to go. ne2000 cards can be gotten for $10
brand new all over the place...
rick
>
>
> --
>
> --
> Gavin Cato - Optus Network Engineer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> gawk; talk; date; wine; grep; touch; unzip; touch; gasp; finger; gasp;
> mount; \
> fsck; more; yes; gasp; umount; make clean; make mrproper; sleep
------------------------------
From: Joe Loyall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPX/PPP Client Problem
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:30:55 -0700
==============84549DEEA5EB25F9D728D187
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Valentin Abramov wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> >
> >
> >--------------5B509E47795215EF29811A53
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> >
> >I am trying to connect to the Novell network at my office from my home
> >machine, which runs RH 5.1. I read the IPX-HOWTO, the PPP-HOWTO, and the
> >pppd man page & configured /etc/ppp/options as follows:
> >
> >lock
> >ipxcp-accept-network
> >ipxcp-accept-remote
> >ipxcp-accept-local
> >ipx
> >
> >When I connect, I get the following:
> >
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/modem
> >at 115200
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of
> >the University of California
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
> >allocation)
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
> >copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: registered device ppp0
> >Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman pppd[2015]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
> >Jan 25 21:03:57 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Serial connection established.
> >Jan 25 21:03:58 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Using interface ppp0
> >Jan 25 21:03:58 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
> >Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Remote message:
> >Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Received bad configure-ack: 01 06
> >23 90 32 31 02 08 00 00 00 00 5d 6f
> >Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: local IP address 146.18.37.227
> >Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: remote IP address 146.18.37.193
> >Jan 25 21:04:03 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Received bad configure-ack: 01 06
> >23 90 32 31 02 08 00 00 00 00 5d 6f
> >Jan 25 21:04:27 Rastaman last message repeated 8 times
> >Jan 25 21:04:30 Rastaman pppd[2015]: IPXCP: timeout sending
> >Config-Requests
> >
> >Needless to say, I get no IPX information at all in /proc/net. The
> >network I am trying to reach uses 802.2 type frames, which may be the
> >problem. The only way I know to set the frame type is the ipx_interface
> >command, which doesn't work until after the ppp interface is up.
> >
> >I'm not very network literate, and am new to Linux, so I'm sure I'm
> >missing something obvious.
> >
> >Any pointers will be welcome.
> >
> >--
> >Joe Loyall
> >
>
> Take a look to
>
> http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux/index.shtml
>
> There IPX over PPP, problems and patches are described in details.
>
> Regards,
> Valentin Abramov
Finally, I had some time & applied the patch for pppd 2.3.3 listed on this
web site. After that, I was able to see the network which I was connecting
to.
I had to upgrade my ncpfs utilities to ncpfs-2.2.0 in order for ncpmount to
work, but no problems after that.
Thanks,
--
Joe Loyall
==============84549DEEA5EB25F9D728D187
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<HTML>
Valentin Abramov wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
<BR>>
<BR>>
<BR>>--------------5B509E47795215EF29811A53
<BR>>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
<BR>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<BR>>
<BR>>I am trying to connect to the Novell network at my office from my
home
<BR>>machine, which runs RH 5.1. I read the IPX-HOWTO, the PPP-HOWTO, and
the
<BR>>pppd man page & configured /etc/ppp/options as follows:
<BR>>
<BR>>lock
<BR>>ipxcp-accept-network
<BR>>ipxcp-accept-remote
<BR>>ipxcp-accept-local
<BR>>ipx
<BR>>
<BR>>When I connect, I get the following:
<BR>>
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp0 on /dev/modem
<BR>>at 115200
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents
of
<BR>>the University of California
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
<BR>>allocation)
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
<BR>>copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman kernel: registered device ppp0
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:38 Rastaman pppd[2015]: pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid
0
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:57 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Serial connection established.
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:58 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Using interface ppp0
<BR>>Jan 25 21:03:58 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Remote message:
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Received bad configure-ack:
01 06
<BR>>23 90 32 31 02 08 00 00 00 00 5d 6f
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: local IP address 146.18.37.227
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:00 Rastaman pppd[2015]: remote IP address 146.18.37.193
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:03 Rastaman pppd[2015]: Received bad configure-ack:
01 06
<BR>>23 90 32 31 02 08 00 00 00 00 5d 6f
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:27 Rastaman last message repeated 8 times
<BR>>Jan 25 21:04:30 Rastaman pppd[2015]: IPXCP: timeout sending
<BR>>Config-Requests
<BR>>
<BR>>Needless to say, I get no IPX information at all in /proc/net. The
<BR>>network I am trying to reach uses 802.2 type frames, which may be
the
<BR>>problem. The only way I know to set the frame type is the ipx_interface
<BR>>command, which doesn't work until after the ppp interface is up.
<BR>>
<BR>>I'm not very network literate, and am new to Linux, so I'm sure I'm
<BR>>missing something obvious.
<BR>>
<BR>>Any pointers will be welcome.
<BR>>
<BR>>--
<BR>>Joe Loyall
<BR>>
<P>Take a look to
<P><A
HREF="http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux/index.shtml">http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux/index.shtml</A>
<P>There IPX over PPP, problems and patches are described in details.
<P>Regards,
<BR>Valentin Abramov</BLOCKQUOTE>
Finally, I had some time & applied the patch for pppd
2.3.3 listed on this web site. After that, I was able to see
the network which I was connecting to.
<P>I had to upgrade my ncpfs utilities to ncpfs-2.2.0 in order for
ncpmount to work, but no problems after that.
<P>Thanks,
<PRE>--
Joe Loyall</PRE>
</HTML>
==============84549DEEA5EB25F9D728D187==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: do I need 2 ethernet cards?
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 14:24:01 -0800
In article <p9mw2.1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Hello All,
>
> I'm going to be setting up a ipfwadm firewall for a friend soon.
>
> His cable modem uses eth0
>
> I was planning on having the internal network use eth0:1
>
> Would I need 2 network cards, or would eth0:1 be ok?
>
> --
>
> --
> Gavin Cato - Optus Network Engineer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> gawk; talk; date; wine; grep; touch; unzip; touch; gasp; finger; gasp;
> mount; \
> fsck; more; yes; gasp; umount; make clean; make mrproper; sleep
>
>
>
>
>
Don't alias your internal network onto the same interface that connects
to the outside world! The cable modem is just a bridge and any traffic
your internal network generates will still get out and be seen by all
your neighbours. Think of a cable modem as a drop on a 10Base-2 LAN.
Use two network cards!
Luca
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 17:31:26 -0500
From: Phil DeBecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: .. about security ..
Mike Marsman wrote:
> yippie!
>
> After many hours, I've finally configured my linux box to talk to my cable
> modem and my internal network at the same time! IP Masq. is up and
> running like a charm!
>
> My only question now is about security ... I'm a little ignorant in this
> area, so please bear with me..
>
> Some background you say ... I'm running Debian 2.0 with the kernel at
> 2.2.1.. 'nuff said?
>
> I've got my hosts.allow file set to allow all 192.168.1.* connections to
> the linux box, as well as a few others. From what I can tell, so long as
> my hosts.deny file is set to ALL, allowing select IP's doesn't pose a big
> security risk -- however, I want to widen my allowed hosts so I can access
> my box from any machine at work/school .. so I'll be allowing something
> like 129.100.*.*
>
> now I know this opens up my machine to hacks, so is there anything
> specific I should be running? Should I have a SOCKS proxy, or will that
> interfere with IPmasq? I know that IPmasq will hide the networked boxes,
> I'm just concerned with the linux box itself.. (esp. with exploits for
> spam relays/etc)
>
> Any ideas would be (greatfully) appreciated.
>
A SOCKS proxy won't interfere with IP Masq, but it isn't particulatrly useful
in your situation. IP Masq is more versatile and just as secure.
The hosts.deny/hosts.allow thing is a good first step. A better question
than what else to run, is what *not* to run.
Do you actually use sendmail? If not, don't run it. Poof, there goes the
spam relay problem. NFS? innd? httpd? These services aren't controlled by
inetd - and therefore they aren't protected by the tcp wrappers that use the
/etc/hosts.deny and hosts.allow. If you don't use them, get rid of them.
Remember, exploits require some sort of server to exploit bugs in, so the
less you run the less likely you are to be hacked.
If you (like me) insist on running server programs that aren't protected by
tcp-wrappers on your firewall machine, then by all means get a copy of
ipchains (since you're running 2.2.1) and set up some firewall rules to deny
access to your server programs from the outside world.
Phil
------------------------------
From: Bill Cripe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Trouble with dip and static IP commection
Date: 12 Feb 1999 05:32:37 GMT
I'm having a difficult time using dip to establish a static ppp
connection. Since the man entry for dip is exactly that, one would
expect this to be easy, but somehow what I'm doing isn't working.
If I set up a dynamic ppp connection, everything's fine, except that
my domain doesn't work with the static address I've been assigned.
I'd like to confirm a couple of things, just to make sure I'm clear
on how dip is supposed to work with a static address.
The first thing I'd like to be more sure about is that when I say
"get $locip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" this should tell my ISP that may static
address is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx and that's exactly who I want to connect as.
Once I've included this in my dip dialog I shouldn't have to "remind"
the ISP's machine who I want to be with any other instructions.
Next I wonder about the $remote/$rmtip variable. I use a large ISP,
and an initial connection may be passed to a different address than was
first encountered. Setting $rmtip so that it matches what's in my
hosts file seems like it might be asking for trouble. On the other
hand not having "get $remote name.dom" in the dip script results in a
$rmtip of 0.0.0.0, which might be fine except that, since the connection
isn't working, anything unusual becomes suspect. Perhaps removing this
from my hosts file is appropriate? and then only set $remote the the
"generic" name of my ISP?
When I make a dynamic connection the dip script requires two get
$locip lines in a row in order to get the actual address I've been
assigned. This is because the initial connection after login contains
what amounts to: initial_connect --> dynamic_address. Doing two "gets"
in a row gives me the second address, which is what I really want.
Given this behavior on the ISP's side, how to I tell it, "no, no, no,
my real address is blah.blah.blah.blah" after it's tried to give me
an address?
I tried adding -ip to my /etc/ppp/options file but that didn't help
the connection. Without it the modem leds show a furious negotiation
and then a hang up. With it, the connection appears smooth and stable,
but I can't do a thing with it, not even ping the ISP itself when it
is showing up in "route".
The kicker here is that I'm switching an old SCO OS3 box from
being the "doorway" to this network, and replacing it with the Linux
box. I can literally pull the plug on the Linux modem and hook it up to
the SCO an everything's fine -- and the SCO 3 system was (is) very shaky
when it comes it the Internet. Whatever's tripping me up isn't a
simple matter of wrong static address, etc.
And if you've read this far, bless your techno heart, doesn't the
dip command "default" usually setup a gateway route? even though the
commented line just ahead of the "default" line in sample.dip doesn't
contain "gw". I've got one relatively older Linux box using a dynamic
connection that makes a gateway out of ppp0, but the new machine that
I'm setting up doesn't do it. Maybe I've patched this somehow on the
old machine, but I didn't find it easily.
Any help will be appreciated. Simply saying, "that sounds fine" to
something will help me to stop treating it as a potential problem
area, and thus perhaps move me closer to solving the problem.
Bill Cripe
------------------------------
From: "Armin W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Firewall oder sonstiges ?? !HILFE!
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 22:58:31 +0100
Hallo ich betreibe einen kleinen Linux Server f�rs Internet f�r zu Hause.
Jetzt hab ich das Problem, dass mitlerweile so m�chte-gern Hacker-Rotzl�ffel
sich auf meiner Platte einklinken, und Dateien nach belieben scannen,
l�schen und erstellen k�nnen, alles ohne Trojaner, es ist irgendwie ein
Windows bug !
Kennt einer von dem Bug ? Wie kann ich den umgehen ?
Kann ich mit linux eine Protection aufbauen dagegen ?
Es w�rde mir sogar reichen wenn die Firewall alles abf�ngt was von der
speziellen IP kommt, da ich diese weiss. Wie kann ich das einrichten ? Wo
bekomm ich sowas her ?
Gr��e,
Armin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kalevi Hautaniemi)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.ppp,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Help, ISP setup!
Date: 29 Jan 1999 07:22:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Gross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hello,
: I need some help, please. I am running RedHat 5.2 on a a clone pc,
: and I am trying to connect to my ISP which is called Integrity Online.
To help us to find out what's wrong, please post the output of 'route -n'
and 'ifconfig' commands while your unusable link is up.
Kalevi
--
Kalevi J Hautaniemi, Kovajankatu 5, 33530 Tampere, FINLAND.
**** http://oh3tr.ele.tut.fi/~oh3fg/ **** On air: OH3FG, KO4BC ****
tel:+358-3-364-7446 mobile:+358-50-590-2243 or +358-50-033-5447
------------------------------
From: Christian Bienia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP problems under 2.2.1
Date: 10 Feb 1999 20:50:08 GMT
Hi Clifford!
Ok, you've said that the problem is not caused by the hardware / the
configuration, and you don't believe it is caused by the software. So
what is it caused by?
As the high amount of Zyxel TAs involved in this problem is obvious,
although not every Zyxel TA is affected, and the problem could be solved
by using software flow control, it might be that the problem only occurs
with a special combination of hardware, software and configuration. I'm
not a network-programmer, so this is pure speculation. But I can easily
imagine that, let's say the code for handling the communication with the
TA itself of the pppd-2.3.5 / new kernel-ppp has been changed and now
causes problems with device xy and chip yz.
That would explain why the problem is not obvious and only affects
special kinds of TAs, but not all off its mark.
Your opinion?
BTW: Just for interest, how did you find out the xonxoff-workaround?
------------------------------
From: Anhtuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HTTP problems using PPP
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 10:01:02 +0100
Michael Kristensen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just recently gotten my PPP line working and it works just fine.
> I can ping, telnet and ftp (on inhouse LAN, in Denmark (where I live)
> and abroad, f.x. USA), but when it comes to HTTP, it just doesn't
> work.
> I've tried both Netscape and Lynx, but neither of them work. They just
> time out (No response from server).
>
> What can be the problem?
>
> Best regards,
> Michael
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Kristensen
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Homepage: http://www.cyberjunkie.com/mk
> ICQ-UIN: 478933
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> My public PGP key is available @ ldap://certserver.pgp.com
> DON'T use the DH/DSS key # 0x09656A81
> ONLY use the RSA key # 0xC90571AD
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Remove antispam sentence (remove_this.) in e-mail address.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
May be you should start httpd at boot
Bye
Anhtuan
------------------------------
From: "danish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NEED HELP................ PLEASE HELP ME
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 00:35:33 -0500
hi people,
I need help with getting on the Internet using Modem.. seems like my
Linux is not recognizing the modem (Viking, v90) which is on Com1... I
would greatly appreciate if someone could tell me how can
I configure my modem and how to access the net , my ISP is Bell
Atlantic........
you could email me at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THANKS
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
