Linux-Networking Digest #265, Volume #10         Sat, 20 Feb 99 17:13:42 EST

Contents:
  Re: Internal Zoom modem ("David McConnell")
  Re: Old ISA ethernet card - Recomendations? (Jason Clifford)
  Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Michael Paci)
  LINUX and OSI TP4 Possible ? (Morten Henckel)
  Mainframe Network Engineer Needed (robert cellich) (ROBERT CELLICH)
  Intel EtherExpress TPE Hub
  Win98 printing to Samba-Server (Help...) ("Frampton O. Maggio")
  Re: Strange NFS problem in 2.2.1 (Hans Adams)
  Re: Surveillance ... tee! hee! (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: PPP under 2.2.1 (Juergen Heinzl)
  Re: pppd REJ's prot c029, should NAK it (Phil Howard)
  Firewall with 1 IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Leased Line pppd will not reconnect itself HELP! (Rob van der Putten)
  Re: Simple Samba question. . . I hope (David Besse)
  Re: Sending request to remote WWW server (Rick Onanian)
  Personal Netware & Linux (Holger Petersen)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "David McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Internal Zoom modem
Date: 20 Feb 1999 18:50:40 GMT

I am running RH 5.1, with a Zoom ComStar SVD 33.6 Model 2800-00-00A ISA PNP
modem.  I couldn't even get a response from the modem at all using minicom,
until I booted into the BIOS and set PnP OS to NO and configuration to
Manual.   Also, I had already disabled the on-board COM2, set my modem to
COM2, and set the IRQ3 to PCI/ISA PnP in the
BIOS PnP Setup screens.  After that, the modem configured just fine and
now it dials out and connects like a champ.  Now my only problem is getting
pppd to work.  1 thing I noticed, before doing all the changes in the BIOS,
if I did a "setserial -a /dev/modem" it reported UART as "unknown".  I knew
at that point it wasn't even talking to the modem at
boot time.  I used setserial to set the uart type, and it still didn't work.
You might check to see what actual UART that particular model has.  Also,
check out the on-line Zoom manual for the AT commands available for the
rockwell based V.34/V.90 modems, I had to use an init string I captured from
IBM IGN Dialer software in windows before I could get the appropriate modem
connection.  For me, it was
 AT $F E0 V1 &D2 &C1 W1 S0=0 S95=47, then after the OK I send
ATS7=60S30=0L0M1\N3%C3&K3B0N1X4.
Now these are for my model of Zoom, you should check before using them on
yours.  OBTW, the manual is on line in the www.zoomtel.com, look in their
documents subpages.  Hope this helps.


--
My opinions are completely my own.  As for my heart and soul,
I'm not so sure....but my ass definately belongs to the IRS.
CAIS wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Please if anyone have an idea:
>
>I am trying to test my internal modem using kermit. I do
>as suggested in the "Serial HOWTO" but the modem responds
>to each command after 2..5 seconds. I checked irqs and
>used setserial to set them correctly. The modem in ISA PnP.
>Should I disable the PnP operation ?
>
>Running Red Hat 4.2
>
>Thanks
>
>Sergio Montano



------------------------------

From: Jason Clifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Old ISA ethernet card - Recomendations?
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 20:27:33 +0000

On Sat, 20 Feb 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:

> I am going to network 2 computers. The other one already is a PCI
> full-duplex 100Base-TX/10Base-T with Reltek 8139 chip (ne2000 for PCI).

That is the wrong driver - you should be using the Realtek 8129/8139
driver (and getting the updated version from the authors site which is far
more stable than the one included in the kernel source even though they
show the same version number)

> What transmission speeds do you suppose I will be able to get out of it? I
> know 100Base is capable of 200 Mbps in full duplex mode. Any ISA cards match
> that?

To my knowledge only 3Com produce a 100baseT ISA network card as the ISA
bus is not ideal for such high bandwidth. I know nothing about the card
per se.

Jason Clifford
Definite Linux Systems
http://definite.ukpost.com/


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Paci)
Crossposted-To: 
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 17:06:56 -0500

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>How about mythical people.  Like Icarus and Daedalus for Sun boxes.  The
>guy who named our data warehouse boxes picked 'em.

Didn't Icarus go down in flames? Also weren't Icarus and Daedalus trying
to do something (fly) that they weren't designed to do? Is that really
something you want associated with your data warehouse box? I would've at
least picked someone immortal (Hermes or Hercules).


--Mike

------------------------------

From: Morten Henckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LINUX and OSI TP4 Possible ?
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 20:16:40 +0000

Hi

With the risk of being the laugh of this newsgroup  I ask;

Is there any implementation of OSI  TP 4 protocol available for linux ?

Thanks in advance

Best regards

Morten Henckel


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ROBERT CELLICH)
Subject: Mainframe Network Engineer Needed (robert cellich)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 18:11:29 GMT

TECHTEMP Inc is helping a client fill a position for a Senior Network
Engineer. The individual considered will be experienced in most
aspects of mainframe based network installation and customization. The
person should also be strong in working within a team and with
customers. The client has strong benefits and will consider paying
relocation, if necessary. They have an excellent work environment and
are very employee oriented. Position is open immediately. Visa
candidates will be considered for this position, AS long as they have
a visa and only need a transfer. Position is based in Chantilly
Virginia about 45 minutes west of Washington DC.


Senior Network Engineer

Job Description:
Installation and customization of all IP routers (3746,2210)
Installation and customization of Remote Access Servers (8235)
Installation and customization of mainframe based IP services (DNS,
Routed, TN32270e, and FTP).
Installation and customization of Firewall software (OS/390 and AIX)
Installation and customization of all mainframe based network software
(VTAM, NCP, NetView, NetView FTP, TCP/IP)
Network engineering of a companies coporate network
Working with customers to provide networking solution for access to
our clients services.
Perform network problem determination.
This position is on call and requires working some weekends.

Qualifications:
Experience: 5 years in a mid to senior level position performing
TCP/IP
related functions described above.

Technical Skills: TCP/IP services configuration and problem
determination, UNIX system administrator experience.
Desired: Installation and customization of TCP/IP software under MVS
or
OS/390
Installation and customization of mainframe based SNA
software and hardware
Installation and customization of PC based SNA software
(example: PCOM) X.25 and Frame Relay knowledge.

If you or anyone you know is interested in this position please send
resume to Robert Cellich at TechTemp Inc. via email or fax

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

703 277 9875 FAX



------------------------------

Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:33:00 -0500
From:  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intel EtherExpress TPE Hub

I have recently got access to an Intel EtherExpress TPE Hub.  While it is
designed for Novell, I am hoping that some enterprising sole out there may
have tried to configure this hub into Linux.  (do I hear the need for a
driver here?)  Is there any input on this.  The Linux community is great
for getting more out of old abandoned equipment (re. turning a 486 into a
router).


------------------------------

From: "Frampton O. Maggio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win98 printing to Samba-Server (Help...)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:24:38 -0500

I am using Red Hat 5.2 with Samba 2.0.2.  The smb.conf is simple and to
the point.  I can connect and map drives from Win98 to Samba Server just
find.  The printer also show up under Network Neighborhood.  I installed
the printer no problems.  I did a test print to the printer --Big
problems.  The printer is a HP Laser Jet 4P.  The errors range from "Can
not print...network device not found.." to "There was a problem printing
to the printer you selected...."  The printer prints fine using lpr
command.

On the 98 box I created prn files and then copied them to the Samba
server and then printed them using lpr testprint.prn and it worked
great.  I just can not get it to print from the Win98 box directly.  I
would be happy to send a copy of my smb.conf and printcap files to
anyone who thinks they can help.

Solutions that I have tried....
    1.  I read all the RTFM's I could find from HOWTO's to Web sights
    2.  I went to the Samba web sight and read the documentation.
    3.  I upgraded Samba 1.9x to 2.0.2.

I will be very thankful for any help

Frampton O. Maggio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Hans Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: Strange NFS problem in 2.2.1
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 21:26:43 +0100

Michal Szymanski wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> After upgrading kernel from 2.0.36 (RedHat 5.2) to 2.2.1, I got strange
> NFS behavior: Old a.out binaries stopped working when invoked from
> a NFS-mounted directory. Kernel support for a.out is (of course ;-)
> compiled in, the same binaries work fine when placed on a local disk.
> 
> The message on the console is:
> 
>   Exec format error. Binary file not executable.
> 
> 'dmesg' shows:
> 
>   N_TXTOFF < BLOCK_SIZE. Please convert binary.
> 
> The same applies to shared libs (i.e. I had to copy both binary and all
> required old shared libs to a local partition).
> 
> Any hints?
> 
1) Would you please tell us more about the NFS-servers!.
1a) Sounds like problems arisen by NFS code of Solaris 2.5.1. 
        including much of the former SysVR4 code, as networking 
        code of SysVR4 was developped by SunSoft.


> regards, Michal.
>
best, hans

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Surveillance ... tee! hee!
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 11:16:54 -0800

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi) writes:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > make everyone use bash and modify /etc/profile so that it does a 
> > echo $LOGNAME has logged on | write root
> 
> Excellent ... but if the person is on a Win98 machine, and only uses
> the Linux box as a fileserver, and router ..?
> 
If they are using it as a file server then you must be running Samba. 
Turn on user authentication in Samba (I'm sure it's possible). Then get a 
package like Log Scanner (check out http://www.freshmeat.net/appindex ) 
to continuously and automatically scan the samba log. Configure Log 
Scanner to notify you when "logins" occur.
-- 
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: PPP under 2.2.1
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 20:38:23 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Keith Davey wrote:
[long line cut off]
>I recently downloaded and compiled the 2.2.1 kernel to my SuSE 5.3 system.

Though I do not use SuSE ... I think their precompiled pppd needs one or
two (to me) unusual options and you might take a look here ...
http://www.suse.de/
... since their support database is available in English too.

Out of my weak mind ... disabling ipx in the options file might help
already.

Cheers,
Juergen

-- 
\ Real name     : J�rgen Heinzl                 \       no flames      /
 \ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
  \ Phone Private : +44 181-332 0750              \                  /

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Howard)
Subject: Re: pppd REJ's prot c029, should NAK it
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 21:18:50 GMT

On 20 Feb 1999 08:28:52 -0600 Clifford Kite ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

| Phil Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
| : Kernel is 2.0.36 with ppp driver compiled in.
| : Distribution is Red Hat 5.2.
| : Running pppd version 2.3.5.
|
| : When dialing up to an Ascend MAX 4000, I get a protocol code C029,
| : which according to RFCs is CBCP (Call Back Control Protocol).  At
| : this point, pppd rejects the session and hangs up.
|
| : Switching to an older Slackware system with kernel version 1.2.13
| : and pppd version 2.1.2, this connection works fine.
|
| : Anyone have any idea why this won't negotiate?  I would seem to me
| : that the appropriate action with be to NAK instead of REJ this.
|
| Reject is appropriate when the ppp implementation doesn't support the
| protocol.  Do you know that it is compiled into the pppd 2.3.5 you
| have?  It's not compiled into pppd by default, see the README.cbcp
| file with the ppp-2.3.5 source package.
|
| FYI, the only ppp-2.3.5 option for CBCP is "callback xxx-xxxx" w/o the
| quotes, where xxx-xxxx is the call back phone number.

I don't want to use callback.  I checked into the callback thing and
indeed pppd is not compiled with callback.  And apparently 2.1.2 doesn't
even have it implemented.  But 2.1.2 works fine and 2.3.5 does not.

I looked around on the Ascend MAX to see if there was a way to totally
turn off all existance of callback, but there isn't any.  No one uses
it, but that would only be a test situation ... you never know when it
might be needed.

I have the book "PPP Design and Debugging" by James Carlson.  It doesn't
get deep enough into this to help, much.  The RFCs will probably have
to be handy.


| : /var/log/messages gets:
|
| : Feb 20 02:06:24 deneb pppd[1431]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
| : Feb 20 02:06:56 deneb pppd[1431]: Serial connection established.
| : Feb 20 02:06:57 deneb pppd[1431]: Using interface ppp0
| : Feb 20 02:06:57 deneb pppd[1431]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua0
| : Feb 20 02:06:57 deneb pppd[1431]: not replacing existing default route to eth0 
|[208.152.116.17]
|
| This is likely to be a problem too.  You have an existing default route
| set up and, even with the defaultroute option, pppd won't replace it with
| one for ppp.  You likely don't need it, a network route will work fine
| for a private LAN.  If this leaves you confused, then RH configuration
| has likely done something dumb.  Someone else will need to tell you what's
| what in that case - I don't run RH.

I saw the problem with the default route.  But I put off routing issues
until I can get the session to come up and stay up.  Then I'll make sure
I can route all internet addresses over it, then route the LAN, then do
DNS ... the usual order of things.

--
 --    *-----------------------------*      Phil Howard KA9WGN       *    --
  --   | Inturnet, Inc.              | Director of Internet Services |   --
   --  | Business Internet Solutions |       eng at intur.net        |  --
    -- *-----------------------------*      phil at intur.net        * --

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Firewall with 1 IP
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 21:07:53 GMT



 - My ISP has asigned me 1 static IP.
 - I have a LAN, and 3 NT Web servers on it that I want to make available to
Inet with 192.168.X.X IPs.

 - I want to put a Linux RedHat 5.2 based firewall before the LAN.

   Would it be possible with just 1 IP, maybe with IP Masquerading or should I
ask for a Class C Network?

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Leased Line pppd will not reconnect itself HELP!
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 21:12:30 +0100

Hi there


On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Dennis Ponne wrote:

> I've got a big problem my linux red hat 5.0 gateway will not reconnect
> itself if the carrier hast lost... where do i have to put the line so it
> will reconnect....

Have a look at the leased line mini howto.


Regards,
Rob

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|              http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html               |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+


------------------------------

From: David Besse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Simple Samba question. . . I hope
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:56:56 -0500

I've just been through this problem as well.  In your smb.conf file, make sure
you have:
    security = share

and this will enable you to at least view the resources available.  To connect
to a resource, you may also need to enable plain text passwords in the registry
of your Win machine:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\Current\ControlSet\Services\VxD\VNETSUP\
  then, select Edit->New->DWORD Value from the menu bar.  Rename the entry to
EnablePlainTextPassword, and set its value to 1.

or set up an smbpasswd file, and enable encrypted passwords on your linux
server, as Win98 by default uses encrypted passwords, and samba by default uses
plain text passwords.

Dave

Thom V wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> get the following message...
>
> Enter Network Password
> You must supply a network password to make this connection:
> Resource:  \\LinuxBox\IPC$
> Password:
>
> Doesn't "IPC" stand for something like "Inter Process Communication"?  Why
> do I need a password for this?  Is there a step that I've skipped?  What is
> the simplest way to resolve this and still keep some degree of security?
>
> Thanks,
> Thom Vandenberg


------------------------------

From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Sending request to remote WWW server
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 14:51:18 -0500

Matt Perdeck wrote:
> 
> How do I receive a page from a WWW server using a C program?
> 
> I need to write a C program (under Linux) that send a request to a remote
> WWW server for an .html or .cgi page and then receives that page. As far as
> the remote server is concerned, my program would look like a WWW browser.
> 
> If you know how to send a request from a C program to a remote WWW server,
> I'd be really grateful if you could tell me how, or point me in the right
> direction.
> Matt Perdeck

I don't know much about programming..but did you try looking at the 
source for Lynx, or any other gnu-licensed browser? Also, I think you
can get at least that part of the source for Netscape from the Mozilla
project..


  rick
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone else. I do not
represent
anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer. Cows go moo.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior, beat-up
rustbucket
that is in need of a lot of restoration and TLC. Must be cheap...I'm
broke.
---
Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or 
rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Holger Petersen)
Subject: Personal Netware & Linux
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 18:36:25 GMT



Is there any way to have a marriage between those two ?

asking, Holger


------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to