Linux-Networking Digest #265, Volume #11 Mon, 24 May 99 15:13:32 EDT
Contents:
Multiple nic's ("Tommy �s�n")
Re: Installing an External TA(modem) on RedHat 5.1 (help needed) (Ray)
Re: ipchains: DENY or REJECT (Jonathan Marks)
Re: Setting Up NIC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ip-up,ip-down dcripte in /etc/ppp (Frank Hahn)
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Detlef Bosau)
Samba share appears as an IP address ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NIS/NFS file permissions ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IRC RFC ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: System cracked! Recovery help? ([email protected])
HELP: RH 6.0, PCMCIA Token Ring doesn't work.. (Surendar Chandra)
Masq and ipfwadm (James Hopkins)
Re: LINUX ability to handle large beowulf clusters (Chris Frost)
Re: Linux and AIX ("Mitch Appleby")
Re: 3com network problem- stumped (Matt Rodkey)
Re: 3com network problem- stumped ("jamal")
Modem sharing ("Mitch Appleby")
Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=BFcomo_hago_una_red_de_2_pc=B4s=3F?= (Ron Aaron)
Wireless ISP and linux routing ("Steven Reppert")
multiple dsl lines (Tiberio, David)
Re: Cannot compile kernel in RH 6 (Peter Caffin)
Re: DNS, where do I define it in linux? ("Ofir Arkin")
SuSE 6.1 and xdialppp problem ("Ron Fodor")
telnet'ing to same system (David Hinz)
Installing Intel Etherexpress Pro 10 ISA with RH 6.0 ("Jack Richins")
Re: How to make my modem working ??? (Rob Clark)
Routing of ip-broadcasts possible? (Levent G�ndogdu)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Tommy �s�n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multiple nic's
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 19:01:12 +0200
I have a machine with one RTL8029 based Nic and three RTL8019 Nic's.
If i try to set up the RTL8019 based cards in netconf using different
adresses it seems to work.
But the next time i run netconf all the cards have the same io/irq
adfresses!!
Has anyone seen this before and is willing to help.
/Tommy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ray)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.dail-up
Subject: Re: Installing an External TA(modem) on RedHat 5.1 (help needed)
Date: 24 May 1999 17:00:53 GMT
On Sun, 23 May 1999 20:49:07 +0200, RJHM van den Bergh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>So I did take a look at the route configuration.
>I'll type it over here.
>Destenation Gateway Genmask Flags Metrics Ref Use Iface
>194.159.73.222 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
>10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
>Plain simply a missing default route.
>I've tried to set the default route several ways.
What command are you using to set the default route? It looks like you
should be using something like:
route add default gw 194.159.73.222
>But all do hang the route configuration
>When I after it type route to see the configuration I do only
>get the first line with Destenation etceteras.
>It doesn't return to the prompt.
Use the '-n' option when using route or netstat to view your routing table
otherwise they will try to do a dns lookup for each address in the routing
table. Of course if you can't contact the dns server you will wait a long
time for a response.
>The Strange thing is before the ISDN adaptor I used a plain old analoge
>modem.
>I did not had any net configuration problems with that.
>So I don't asume that is the problem.
>PPP-HOWTO does say this but i simpy don't beleave it.
>
>At the moment I do use minicom to make the connection.
>and then do a
>pppd -d -detach /dev/modem &
>to get the pppd conection.
The fact that you are getting connected pretty much eliminates your modem/TA
as the source of your problems. It really sounds like just a routing issue
(maybe even just a typo somewhere).
--
Ray
------------------------------
From: Jonathan Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains: DENY or REJECT
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 17:12:21 GMT
Hi,
Paraphrasing from David Ranch's Trinity OS doc.
'www.ecst.csuchico.edu/~dranch/LINUX/TrinityOS.wri - which is a damn good read, if
you've got a spare afternoon.
>From a security perspective, it is always better to reject external packets.
Reject lets a hacker know you are not accepting packets on that port. With Deny,
the hacker knows you are there, and deduces (s)he is being filtered.. Reject
makes your box look dumber.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> which is better to DENY or REJECT ??
>
> --
> It's nice having Multiple Personalities! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.infinex.com/~gman Keeper of Bay Area
> B.A.S.P: Shell
> Linux => OS for the Computer-Literate! Providers List
> (=E G-man, G-DoG, Archy, LoOoD, Gary B. from E.C and FoG CiTY
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Setting Up NIC
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 14:12:14 GMT
I have been to Donald Becker's web site,
downloaded the latest 3c59x.c file (which includes
fixes for the 3c905B card). I rebuilt the kernel
(version 2.0.36) and now at boot the 3c905B card
is recognized but the kernel panics when it cannot
mount the root device
PARTITION CHECK:
VFS: CANNOT OPEN ROOT DEVICE 08:01
KERNEL PANIC: VFS: UNABLE TO MOUNT ROOT FS ON 08:01
I have checked with rdev the kernel is looking for
/dev/sda1 (which is correct).
The default Redhat 5.2 kernel (2.0.36) boots and
finds the root device with no problem; however it
cannot identify the 3c905B card. Any thoughts?
I'm stumpted.
Thanks,
Jim Barker
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Peter Eddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The driver that came with my copy of RedHat 5.2 didn't work for my
> 3c905b card. I got and updated driver
> (http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/3c509.c which contains the
> 905b driver too) from http://cesdis1.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/ and
> achieved happyness.
>
> Peter
>
> "KERR, MIKE" wrote:
> >
> > I've got a 3c905b-tx NIC card which I'm trying to install in a RH
Linux
> > 5.2 comp. I don't have a driver for it, but I've used the closest
thing
> > RH 5.2 had, which is 3c59x.o.
> > My kernel version is 2.0.34-0.6.
> >
> > Any suggestions on how to fix this damn problems?!? ; )
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Mike
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: ip-up,ip-down dcripte in /etc/ppp
Date: 24 May 1999 13:18:45 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23 May 1999 16:55:32 GMT, Konstantin Wiesel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How doe i have to call ipppd in order to make it execute these scripts
>
>and how does such a script have to look like in order to execute
>for instance the following line:
>
>route add default ippp0
>
These scripts are just simple shell scripts. I think the execute
permissions need to be set.
I have the ip-up and ip-down scripts in the /etc/ppp directory.
Nothing in particular needs to be done specify them.
The man page for pppd should have more details. The pppd source
file archive also has several example scripts.
--
Frank Hahn
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.
-- Martin Luther King, Jr.
------------------------------
Date: 24 May 1999 16:34:00 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Detlef Bosau)
Crossposted-To:
de.comm.internet.routing,comp.os.linux.networking,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
[EMAIL PROTECTED] meinte am 24.05.99
zum Thema "Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken":
>
> On 24 May 1999, Detlef Bosau wrote:
>
> > Kann ich auf Linux ICMP Redirect und IP Source Routing
> > unterdruecken? Bzw. wie weit kann der Kernel letzteres
> > ueberhaupt?
>
> ICMP-Redirect kann man im Kernel abschalten;
> Source-Routing ist default-maessig off (kann erst der 2.2er-kernel)
> (bzw. was meinst du mit "IP Source Routing unterdruecken" ?)
>
Danke fuer die Differenzierung.
Ein echtes "Unterdruecken" waere eigentlich das Loeschen der gesamten
Sourcerouteinformation. Das waere z.B. bei Loose Source Routing
ausgesprochen sinnvoll.
Zum Hintergrund:
Ich knuepfe an mein wildes AS-Konzept von unlaengst an. Mittlerweile
habe ich begriffen, dass man das ganze mit BGP sehr schoen machen
kann. Jetzt moechte ich das ganze soweit ausweiten, dass ich teilweise
gemeinsam genutze Netze nicht mehr per Paketfilter schuetzen moechte,
das laesst sich aus gewissen Gruenden nicht machen, sondern ich
moechte eben den Schutz dadurch gewaehrleisten, dass ich ein
eingeschraenktes Routing realisiere. Was die Verteilung der Routen
angeht, laesst sich das mit BGP sehr schoen darstellen. Aber um einen
sicheren Schutz, auch ohne gesonderten Paketfilter, darzustellen,
muss ich auch das Unterlaufen von nicht gesetzten Routen abstellen.
Und darum muss ich Source Routing ausschalten.
Ein prinzipielles Nichtbeachten von Sourcerouteinformation waere fuer
meine Zwecke schon ausreichend.
Aber ein aktives Wegloeschen waere noch nuetzlicher.
Gruss
Detlef
--
Detlef Bosau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bienroder Weg 79 Tel.: +49 531 303383
D2: +49 172 6819937
38106 Braunschweig, Germany Fax: +49 531 303364
>>>> PGP Public Key als Empfangsbestaetigung <<<<
## CrossPoint v3.1 R ##
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Samba share appears as an IP address
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 17:07:02 GMT
My Samba share appears as an IP address in "Network Neighborhood". Is
there any way to assign a name address to it? my hosts and lmhosts file
list it as Linux_Server, but it is not apeparing as such. It is quite
frusterating.
- Steve
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NIS/NFS file permissions
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 14:02:57 GMT
Hi..
we're setting up a linux network.. The user/passwords verify through
NIS, then it takes the user to that specific home directory.. But after
that it will not let the user have write access to there home dir.. Nor
will it let us start Xwindows...
help--
thank You
mike nichols
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: IRC RFC ?
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 13:36:00 GMT
Hi,
Sorry if this is a bit off topic, but does anyone know if there
was an RFC filed for IRC, and if so what is it's number ?
And BTW does anyone know of a web-based search engine for RFC's
so that I could do this sort of search myself ?
Cheers.
Simon.
P.S If possible cc me on your reply.
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [email protected]
Subject: Re: System cracked! Recovery help?
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 13:20:06 -0400
> My copy of Ghost does not see my ext2 partitions. Could you please let
> me know how this is done?
Joe
> oh! by the way, if you have a dedicated firewall/GW think about
> adding a 2nd HD with a dos Part.on it ( or zip drive / jaz dr ) and
> ghost an image of your ext2 disk to the dos drive.
> that way if it happens again you can be up and running a 5 minutes
------------------------------
From: Surendar Chandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP: RH 6.0, PCMCIA Token Ring doesn't work..
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 11:03:26 -0400
Hi,
I have installed RH 6.0 with 2.2.9 Kernel and PCMCIA 3.0.10 on a IBM
Think Pad 760E
and am trying to use a IBM Token Ring Auto 16/4 Credit card adapter with
no luck.
Apparently it is a memory problem, but I can't figure out the correct
memory range
for mmiobase. For example, if I give the mmio to be anything less than
0xd4000 it says
memory range in use. If I use 0xd4000 it accepts it, switches to 4 Mbps
and gives
adapter error :ISRP_EVEN: 04. I have turned off the high memory
locations from pcmcia/config.opts.
Has anyone successfully used a IBM Token Ring PCMCIA card with a 2.2.x
kernel? What
memory locations did you use?
Thanks much for all your help
-S
------------------------------
From: James Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Masq and ipfwadm
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 11:19:42 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using Kernel 2.0.34 , ipfwadm. The Linux box contains the modem.
With 98% of web sites it works great but with a few sites, computers
behind the firewall can not connect while the Linux box can? One of
these sites is American Airlines: www.aa.com. The outgoing packets seem
to get to the AA server but the server does not send back any pages?
What could be causing this problem?
Jim
--
------------------------------
From: Chris Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: LINUX ability to handle large beowulf clusters
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 10:04:35 -0500
In comp.os.linux.development.system Joachim Zobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to run that many nodes on pc hardware availability will be
> a problem. How does beowulf handle this? If you have 300 nodes and the
> whole system is down if one fails there might not be much uptime.
For the clusters which I have setup we've always done things so that no
one box is essential (except for one cluster where we only had one box
which controlled everything, but then it would only be that one box which
was essential). Maybe the person who asked is doing it a different way,
but you may want to see what could be done so as to rid whatever makes you
dependent upon every box being up.
--
- Chris
-- Visit Me at http://www.frostnet.advicom.net --
------------------------------
From: "Mitch Appleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and AIX
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 10:16:54 -0500
We have the same setup Redhat 5.2 and AIX/RS-6000. We use a 10/100 switch
from Kingston, however, I've seen 4 port 10/100 hubs from Net Gear, that
work well, for less than $89. This is a no brainer and it comes with LEDs
for band width.
Mitch Appleby
IS Admin
Dubuque Stamping
Thomas Mielke wrote in message <7i95u5$sqm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi all,
>
>I have a performance problem between a Linux PC with a PCI RTL8139 10/100
MB
>Ethernet card and a IBM RS/6000 with a 10MB Ethernet card. Both connected
by
>a UTP-cross cable.
>
>The PC detects the 10MBit max speed and half-duplex, nevertheless I have a
>network speed of max 30kByte measured with ftp.
>
>Any tips welcome
>Thomas
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Matt Rodkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com network problem- stumped
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 15:27:54 +0000
jamal wrote:
> I do. Still searching for solution.
> I noticed that the cards share same i/o.
> The IRQs are different.
>
> Jamal
>
> Walt Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I have two 3Com 3c509 cards with RedHat 5.2 The system recogizes both
> cards just
> > fine; however, I cannot ping anything on either LAN. If I remove one of
> the cards
> > everything works fine. Has anyone seen anything like this?
> >
> >
> >
I had the same problem. The IO Addresses and the IRQs must be different.
You can use the configuration disk that came with the card to set these. I
believe the tool is called 3C5X9CFG.EXE.
Matt
------------------------------
From: "jamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com network problem- stumped
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 23:13:17 +0800
I do. Still searching for solution.
I noticed that the cards share same i/o.
The IRQs are different.
Jamal
Walt Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have two 3Com 3c509 cards with RedHat 5.2 The system recogizes both
cards just
> fine; however, I cannot ping anything on either LAN. If I remove one of
the cards
> everything works fine. Has anyone seen anything like this?
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Mitch Appleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Modem sharing
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 10:21:28 -0500
Can a Linux box be configured to share a modem in standard mode. That is to
just share it as a modem where a network user can call a BBS or connect to
an individual PC at payroll processing center?
We already use Linux for Internet access, faxing and email. Rock Solid!
Mitch Appleby
IS Admin
Dubuque Stamping
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Aaron)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,es.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=BFcomo_hago_una_red_de_2_pc=B4s=3F?=
Date: 24 May 1999 17:43:43 GMT
On Fri, 21 May 1999 18:18:22 +0200, OOOOO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> necesito un poco de ayuda para conectar mi portatil al ordenador de
>>> sobremesa a traves de targetas de red ethernet, llevo varios dias
....
>>> el portatil con Suse:
>>> rou.mierda.net ip: 125.1.3.88 mask: 255.0.0.0 gw: 125.1.0.222
>>>
>>> el de sobremesa con Red hat:
>>> rotxa.mierda.net ip: 125.1.5.0 mask: 255.0.0.0 gw 125.1.0.222
>>>
>
>Lo primero de todo, si solo tienes 2 pc's ... para que co�o quieres 3 bytes
>de mascara ???? con 255.255.255.0 vas que te matas y, por supuesto, esos
>ip's no te sirven. Puedes usar 125.1.3.1 y 125.1.3.2 ...
Lo mas importante - tiene una red de mierda!
------------------------------
From: "Steven Reppert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wireless ISP and linux routing
Date: 24 May 1999 15:09:25 GMT
I am using a wireless ISP, the equipment i have has a hardcoded ip address,
one for the cable modem box X.X.X.139 and one for my nic card X.X.X.140.
When using win95/98 I have to leave my nics ip address set to obtain one
automatically.
It then pulls it from the cable/modem box. X.X.X.140.
I was wondering if I can put this on my linux box, so I can share it on my
network.
If so how do I setup my routing to use the hardcoded ip address.
I am familiar with linux routing, I just need to know if this would work
with a hardcoded address.
or if linux can pull the address from the cable modem.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tiberio, David)
Subject: multiple dsl lines
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 07:20:26 -0800
I am adding a second dsl line to my network and do not know how to configure
everything.
the dsl modem needs a 10mb connection, so I have a 10/100 switch. when I add
the
second dsl line, do I just plug it into the switch and configure it the same
as I
configured my first line and everything will work?
do I need 2 nic cards for each machine? I want each machine to be accessible
through
each dsl line (web servers) so that if one line is saturated I can still
route traffic to the
same machine through another dsl line.
and I want internal 100mb between all machines.
what is the proper way to set this up?
one dsl line has a netopia modem, the other has a flowpoint 2200 router.
I currently have 5 linux machines and 1 win98 machine. each machine has 1
nic card although
I have 3 spares not being used. some machines are set up with aliasing.
dtiberio
oofness
please cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ****
------------------------------
From: Peter Caffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Cannot compile kernel in RH 6
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 23:01:22 +0800
In comp.os.linux.misc Jim Orfanakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is with 'make boot'. It finishes with the error:
> 'System is 612K'
> 'System is to too big'
> 'Try using bzImage or modules'
> Any Ideas?
To suggest the obvious, use `make bzImage` or else reduce the kernel size
by using modules.
Better yet, use `make bzlilo` to make the image and automatically have it
installed with LILO.
--: _ _ _ _
_oo__ |_|_ |__ _ | _ |_|_o _ peter at ptcc dot it dot net dot au |
//`'\_ | (/_|(/_| |_(_|| | || | http://it.net.au/~pc |
/ PO Box 869, Hillarys WA 6923, AUSTRALIA |
------------------------------
From: "Ofir Arkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS, where do I define it in linux?
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 15:52:57 +0200
/etc/resolv.conf
sample:
nameserver PRIMARY_DNS_SERVER_IP
nameserver SECONDARY_DNS_SERVER_IP ( if u got a secondary)
Ofir Arkin
WebMaster: www.linuxpowered.com
John Hornblow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Hi
>
> where do I enter the DNS of my ISP in linux?
>
> thanks
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> =====================================================
> John Hornblow
> gliding page http://www.soar.co.nz/
> =====================================================
------------------------------
From: "Ron Fodor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SuSE 6.1 and xdialppp problem
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 14:27:03 -0400
I have SuSE 6.1 kernel 2.2.5 and I am usung xdialppp to connect to
mindspring. I monitor the connection using tail -f /var/log/messages. I
connect fine with the last two lines being the remote ip address and the
local ip address. The connection will stay up until I kill it. BUT, I
can't receive anything from mindspring. I can ping myself and it works fine.
If I ping any other IP it sends packets but receives no responses. Anyone
have any ideas on what to do next? I'm new to Linux and it sure would be
nice to connect to the net from Linux for downloads. Maybe I could even get
my printer to work, or my soundblaster live or all of the other devices that
aren't working. Thanks for any help.
------------------------------
From: David Hinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: telnet'ing to same system
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 18:42:08 GMT
On a RH 5.1 system, I'm having problems doing a telnet back to the same
system I'm running on.
If I start an xterm, then do a "telnet kenwig" it connects, then says
"connection closed by remote system" (or something like that). This
fails if I use the IP address also.
What am I missing?
david.
------------------------------
From: "Jack Richins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Installing Intel Etherexpress Pro 10 ISA with RH 6.0
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 11:27:57 -0700
I'm installing RH 6.0 and I'm having trouble getting my Intell EtherExpress
Pro 10 detected. Autodetection hangs. I copied IRQ and I/O port information
from Windows, which detects it fine. However, the RH manual shows a MEM
parameter that I should also pass the module. I can't find anything about a
memory address associated with my network card under Windows, so I've been
leaving it blank. This is what I've tried passing the module:
eepro=0x210,3
eepro=0x210,03
eepro=0x210,3,0
For all of these I get an error saying it can' find my card. I've allso
tried the eexpress drive like this:
eexpress=0x210,3.
That, of course, also doesn't work.
Any suggestions or guesses?
------------------------------
Subject: Re: How to make my modem working ???
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Clark)
Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 18:32:15 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Warlord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'd like to know how to configure my modem (olitec 56k pci).
>It emulates a COM 3 under windows and i don't what to do.
The Olitec PCI 56000 is a Windows-only software modem. It will not work
with Linux :(
Sorry,
Rob Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.o2.net/~gromitkc/winmodem.html
------------------------------
From: Levent G�ndogdu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing of ip-broadcasts possible?
Date: 24 May 1999 18:31:10 GMT
Hello everyone.
I wonder if routing of ip broadcast packages is possible using linux.
Please let me know if you have an idea on how to solve this. Thank you!
The scenario:
If have two subnets (192.168.0.* and 192.168.1.*) which are connected
via a Linux box. The ip forwarding works pretty fine. I can reach every
computer on the other subnet. But: my workstations tries to find a specific
service via IP-Broadcast. The service can be found on different computers.
All services reply to this broadcast, except those on the other subnet.
I assume, that Linux does not forward broadcasts to other subnets, because
they are addressed to 192.168.0.255 (for example). Does anyone know, if
I could configure my linux to relay all received broadcasts on one
adapter (for example eth0=192.168.0.1) to another (eth1=192.168.1.1) ?
Thank you very much for your help.
BTW: I am using Linux kernel 2.2.9 with ipchains.
Thanks again.
Bye,
Levent ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
