Linux-Networking Digest #302, Volume #10 Thu, 25 Feb 99 16:13:41 EST
Contents:
Re: ISDN T/A - going to be the death of me ("fertile")
what does eth0: Trigger_send() while transmitter busy mean? (david)
Re: RH 5.2 HD Install - WON'T - HELP!!! (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: simple routing within same network (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: Unresolved Symbols when using tulip driver. (Jeff Seawell)
Re: RH 5.2 HD Install - WON'T - HELP!!! (Carl B. Constantine)
Re: problem with ftp (PC^God)
Default route to eth0 when ip is dinamicaly assigned ("Alain Arb.")
Re: Win98->Linux semi-newbie (Mike)
Re: HELP! - sendmail hangs ("Michel A. Lim")
LDAP server? (Frederic Faure)
Re: Problem with new mail showing up in EVERY terminal window...
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NIC for Linux ("Evangelos K. Koutsavdis")
Re: Firewall with 1 IP (Aris CRuz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "fertile" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISDN T/A - going to be the death of me
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 17:14:32 -0000
one thing i forgot , i was going to use the --nodeps argument on rpm , but
is that safe to do ?
kev
fertile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The kisdn looks like it may help a lot, thanks for the tip :)
> One seemingly simple problem ? i am having installing it though
> let me paste from irc where i was ignored..
> �fertile� i just installed QT libs .. the qt-1.42 and the qt-devel-1.42 ,
> they went in n/p but everytime i try and rpm a particualr package at the
> moment, i get a failed dependency .. qtlib >= 1.40 is required by blah
> blah.rpm .. anyone know whats going on here ? :)
>
> the blah blah.rpm abopve was the kisdn that requires the new QT .. but i
did
> succesfully have both the devel and the normal libs in as part of kde
..and
> an rpm -q -a reports them both ..
> but still when i go for the rpm -Uvh kisdn...etc it gives me the failed
> dependency
>
> thanks anyway for the advice
>
> kev
>
> Erik Hensema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > fertile wrote:
> > [...] an essay
>
> You need a completely different pppd, ipppd, and should configure the card
> > using isdnctrl.
> > Maybe you could use kisdn (kisdn.headlight.de) for configuring the card,
> > I've never tried it.
> >
> > Also, visit this page: www.wurtel.demon.nl (however, I could be in
dutch,
> > I'm not sure).
> >
> > --
> > Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
>
------------------------------
From: david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: what does eth0: Trigger_send() while transmitter busy mean?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 11:29:08 -0800
I am using a ne compatible with ne as a loaded module in 2.0.35
It pings loop
it pings its own ip but wont send outside the box. It gives the
error
eth0: Trigger_send() while transmitter busy.
What is that trying to tell me?
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 HD Install - WON'T - HELP!!!
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 12:55:24 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl,
Your description of the drives and their lettering is a
little confusing. You mention
> The 2.5 GB hd has 3 partitions. 1 is used for the Compaq setup utils. The
> other two are C & D respectively.
Not sure what your saying here part 1 is C, part 2 should be D
and 3 E so what's ment by "the other two being C and D" is vague.
I'm installing RH 5.2 to the 4.3 (though I
> may change this setup around). I have a Parallel Port ZIP (not ZIP plus or
> 250 MB Zip). Windows NT 4 is installed on C. Both C & D drives are FAT16,
> not NTFS or FAT32.
>
> Now my problem.
> ---------------
> Downloaded RH 5.2 and placed it on D, first in a sub-dir from the root.
> Created the boot and supp disks. Went through the install, partitioned the
> drive, etc. When it comes to the part where it asks for where the RedHat
> directory is, I choose the device (/dev/hda5/ - D drive) and the path /rh52.
I can't place where you are in the install process by the
description above. Is this where you are doing the partitoning
of the the drive during the install process? If so then it looks
like you think your working with hda and should be targeting hdb,
c or d depending on how your have partitoned your drives. During
the install Druid should show you a list of drives it sees and
when you select a name at the top then in middle it will offer
you a drive selection which you can select with an asterisk. I
think you should be targeting hdb - the second drive (the 4.3)
off the primary controller.
>
> RH starts scanning the directory and then gives this error:
>
> Error opening directory
>
> ??? Say What??? I've tried installing from the root of D and the root of C.
> I'm not stupid, I know what I'm doing here but it refuses to work and I
> DON'T KNOW WHY!!!!
>
> What error is it getting opening the directory??? WHy? What can I do to STOP
> IT!
>
> Can ANYONE tell me what's going on and how can I fix it? I'm sure I have all
> the files, etc. But I can't figure out for the life of me what the heck is
> causing this error. Do I need a trans.tbl file? What?
>
> I have RH5.1 on CD that I got from a Book, but I didn't want to go through
> the long ardious process of installing RH5.1 and then trying to update all
> the RPMs to the latest versions (including kernal 2.2.2). Mind you I may
> have to do this. So if anyone has done that and know exactly what to do,
> here's the info I need from you. Since it will be a lot of info, do NOT post
> it here. instead, e-mail me directly. That will save a lot of bandwidth.
>
> 1) what did you install from 5.1 for a "workstation" type install. Note: I
> need DHCP to work. I also want the latest GNOME and E! What do you have
> starting up in RH 5.1
>
> 2) What RPM's did you specifically upgrade?
> 3) where did you place the RPM's to install
> 4) what effect did it have on your installed programs?
> 5) how exactly did you do it.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help anyone can give.
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PGP Key available on request
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> The programmer's national anthem is "AAAAAAAARRRRGHHHHH!!."
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: simple routing within same network
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:21:22 -0800
In article <7b3qgo$vld$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Feb 25 15:33:44 1999 GMT
> X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i586)
> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x3.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 195.177.27.163
>
> Hi all,
>
> probably this is fairly simple, anyway can somebody give me
> a hint on this:
>
> I�m trying to set up basic routing between two network cards.
>
> IP-Forwarding is turned on in the kernel, all firewalling is
> turned off.
>
> My network looks like this:
>
>
> 194.97.200.169 194.97.200.162/3/4...
> | |
> [internet]-------[router]-------[linux-box]-------[internal-network]
> | |
> | 194.97.200.168
> 194.97.200.161
>
>
> My Internal network consists of 194.97.200.162, 163, 164, 165, 166,
> 167, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174 and 175.
>
> With this setup I can ping the router as well as the internal
> network using eth1 for the router and eth0 for internal.
>
> Now what doesnt work is the routing. from internal I can�t ping the
> router and vice versa.
>
> Another thing I can�t do: I can�t ping the eth1 IP-Address, neither from
> the linux box itself nor from anywhere else.
> But: I can ping the router _through_ it. (so it basically works)
>
> Shouldn�t it be possible to ping all the local interfaces even without
> any routing entries?
>
> BTW: Here�s the routing table:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 194.97.200.168 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 dummy0
> 194.97.200.161 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
> 194.97.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
> 0.0.0.0 194.97.200.161 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
>
> My /etc/route.conf looks like this:
>
> 194.97.200.161 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth1
> 194.97.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
> default 194.97.200.161 0.0.0.0 eth1
>
> When I change the network part (.200.) of one of the interfaces
> to 201 or something, everything works fine. Linux just doesn�t
> seem to know that it should route between to cards that are
> obviously on the same subnet.
>
> Anything special I have to set the subnet-mask to for this
> to work?
It appears that your upstream ISP has allocated you a 14-host CIDR-block:
network: 194.97.200.160
netmask: 255.255.255.240
brdcast: 194.97.200.175
valid addresses: 194.97.200.161 - 194.97.200.174
NOTE: If I have surmised correctly, you should not be using 175!!!
So, you can do one of four things:
(1) Use NAT (network address translation)
(2) Use IP Masquerade. (similar to NAT but uses only one IP address)
(3) Set up static routes on the router and the linux box. (see below)
(4) Set up your linux box as a bridge rather than a router. (see below)
You need to set up static routes on the router as follow (assuming Cisco
syntax):
route add 194.97.200.162 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.163 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.164 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.165 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.166 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.167 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.168 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.170 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.172 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.173 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
route add 194.97.200.174 255.255.255.240 194.97.200.169
And on the firewall:
route add host 194.97.200.169 mask 255.255.255.240 dev eth0
route add host 194.97.200.168 mask 255.255.255.240 dev eth1
route add host 194.97.200.161 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.169
route add host 194.97.200.162 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.163 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.164 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.165 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.166 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.167 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.168 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.170 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.172 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.173 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
route add host 194.97.200.174 mask 255.255.255.240 gw 194.97.200.168
Ugly! I really recommend using NAT (network address translation) or IP
Masquerade. Check out the Masquerade HOWTO, part of the Linux
Documentation Project. Also check out the Firewall+Bridge HOWTO.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Jeff Seawell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Unresolved Symbols when using tulip driver.
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 13:09:09 -0500
Try using this compile statement:
gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/net/inet -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c tulip.c `[ -f
/usr/include/linux/modversions.h ] && echo -DMODVERSIONS`
then run depmod -a ...it should work fine this time. Also, for the
latest tulip.o driver update, go to:
http://maximus.bmen.tulane.edu/~siekas/driver.html
Jeff (remove _nospam_)
Jorg Gaubmann wrote:
>
> I am using Red Hat 5.2 Kernel 2.0.3..
>
> I am installing my second network card (netgear 310tx). It came with a tulip
> driver which I compiled fine, but when I issue some command for
> dependancies, it gives me a couple of messages saying there are unresolved
> symbols.
>
> Can anyone help?
>
> Sorry for the lack of details, I dont have all the info in front of me.
>
> Jorg
------------------------------
From: Carl B. Constantine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 HD Install - WON'T - HELP!!!
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:35:18 GMT
> Carl,
> Your description of the drives and their lettering is a
> little confusing. You mention
sorry about that.
>> The 2.5 GB hd has 3 partitions. 1 is used for the Compaq setup utils. The
>> other two are C & D respectively.
> Not sure what your saying here part 1 is C, part 2 should be D
> and 3 E so what's ment by "the other two being C and D" is vague.
Ok, there are 3 partitions on this internal drive. The first is set up by
Compaq to use their Setup and diagnostic utils. This partition is not
accessible outside of hitting F10 at boot time to go to the setup (like the
bios on most PC's). The other 2 partitions are the normal C & D partitions.
Both FAT16.
>> Now my problem.
>> ---------------
>> Downloaded RH 5.2 and placed it on D, first in a sub-dir from the root.
>> Created the boot and supp disks. Went through the install, partitioned the
>> drive, etc. When it comes to the part where it asks for where the RedHat
>> directory is, I choose the device (/dev/hda5/ - D drive) and the path
/rh52.
>
> I can't place where you are in the install process by the
> description above. Is this where you are doing the partitoning
> of the the drive during the install process? If so then it looks
> like you think your working with hda and should be targeting hdb,
> c or d depending on how your have partitoned your drives. During
> the install Druid should show you a list of drives it sees and
> when you select a name at the top then in middle it will offer
> you a drive selection which you can select with an asterisk. I
> think you should be targeting hdb - the second drive (the 4.3)
> off the primary controller.
Ok. It's the part (late in the process) where the RH installer asks "Where's
RedHat/RPMS and RedHat/base." All the partitioning (using FDisk BTW) has all
been done on /dev/hdb.
I've tried these setups:
c:\RedHat (ie: straight off the root)
c:\rh52\Redhat
d:\RedHat
D:\rh52\RedHat
The installer scans the dir, and then gives the error. I KNOW I'm specifying
the directory correctly, cuz if I don't, the installer tells me the RedHat
install tree is not on that device.
>
>>
>> RH starts scanning the directory and then gives this error:
>>
>> Error opening directory
>>
>> ??? Say What??? I've tried installing from the root of D and the root of
C.
>> I'm not stupid, I know what I'm doing here but it refuses to work and I
>> DON'T KNOW WHY!!!!
>>
>> What error is it getting opening the directory??? WHy? What can I do to
STOP
>> IT!
Hope this helps clear things up.
--
===============================================================
Carl B. Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Key available on request
===============================================================
The programmer's national anthem is "AAAAAAAARRRRGHHHHH!!."
------------------------------
From: PC^God <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: problem with ftp
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 18:32:32 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacob Hesch wrote:
> $ ftp localhost
> Connected to localhost.
> 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
> ftp>
>
> I have checked initd, and it is running ftp. The ftp line is
> uncommented in /etc/inetd.conf and /etc/hosts.deny is empty. I don't
> know where to go from here!
have you checked to see if the location for ftpd in inetd.conf exists??
I had this problem when seting up my RedHat5.0 machine (ftpd not
installed by default). installing the RPM fixed it right up :-)
-- PC^God --
------------------------------
From: "Alain Arb." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Default route to eth0 when ip is dinamicaly assigned
Date: 25 Feb 1999 17:47:31 GMT
I know that this should be an easy Q. but I looked in many places and what
I found was how to assign the default route to an ip on a specified card.
What I need is a way to add a default route to my eth0 who's also a dhcp
client for videotron.
TIA.
A.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike)
Subject: Re: Win98->Linux semi-newbie
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 16:04:05 GMT
Greetings:
I'm a networking newbie myself (went out and puchased 3 NICs 3 days
ago) so take this for what it's worth.
I struggled with the same problem (or at least the same symptom) and
finally got things working. In my case I had the NIC's on the Linux
box set in Full Duplex mode. I changed them to half-duplex and
everything started working flawlessly.
In my particular case I'm using 10Mbps PnP NICs that came with a
floppy with a config program for setting the io, irq, duplex, etc. I
just boot from a win disk, run the program off the setup disk, and
all's set. Miraculously, booting from a Win95 startup disk didn't
break my LILO config but you should probably make sure you have a
linux bootable disk handy if you do this.
Hope this helps!
Mike Z.
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 15:27:54 -0600, Rodney Wade
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Now i have tried to get them to network so that i can ping one from the
>other, but no matter which one i try i can not get any packets sent. I
>have 100% loss. Can anyone help me out.Thanks in advance.
>
>Rodney Wade
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Michel A. Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP! - sendmail hangs
Date: 25 Feb 1999 19:56:23 GMT
Erik,
thank you for your assistance. your message seems to indicate that my
sendmail issue is directly related to my other networking problems. i
am trying to connect my linux server to my windows network, which
includes an NT3.51 server and 9x/NT4 workstations. i am not
particularly network savvy, and i've been having some difficulties.
you are correct. i did specify a name server in /etc/resolv.conf. my
NT3.51 server (static ip address 192.168.34.1) is the WINS and DHCP
server for my network. when booting up my linux server, it is
dynamically assigned an available ip address by my NT server. i can
confirm this with the ifconfig command.
this is where the fun starts. curiously, the ip address displayed by
ifconfig does NOT match the ip address in the WINS database on my NT
server. furthermore, the hostname -v command at the linux box displays
"WHL_NT1," instead of "WHL31," which is the host name i specified in
linuxconf/basic host information. also, the command prompt appears as
[user@WHL_NT1 /], but at one time it did appear as [user@WHL31 /].
conversely, the linux machine appears in the workstation network
neighborhood as "WHL31." weird, isn't it?
i believe this may also be related. when starting the httpd daemon, i
receive the following error messages:
http: cannot determine local host name
Use the ServerName directive to set it manually.
i'm missing something somewhere, but i'm running out of ideas. i don't
think it is a samba issue though. what do you think?
thank you again for you time. i really appreciate it.
regards,
michel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frederic Faure)
Subject: LDAP server?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 20:14:26 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
As we investigate how to dump Notes for e-mail, keeping it to share
DBs, we need to come up with an LDAP server to enable users throughout
the company (US and Europe) to easily access a company-wide LDAP
directory.
Any good server available for Linux?
Thanks,
FF.
--
The system required Windows 95 or better, so I installed Linux!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Problem with new mail showing up in EVERY terminal window...
Date: 25 Feb 1999 05:40:58 GMT
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 01:28:22 -0500, Trey Blancher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Every time I receive [a] message[s] in my mailbox, [all of] the
>message[s] is/are displayed in every terminal window(xterms, virtual
>windows) I am logged on to or have open. I thought it may be because I
>was using fetchmail (checking mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED]), but I sent
>a message directly to my mail server
>account([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and the same thing happened. I
>think the problem is that everytime a new message appears in
>/var/spool/mail/trey (my mail spool file) I am notified by having every
>message displayed in every terminal. A simple "You have new mail in
>/var/spool/mail/trey" would suffice.
>
>It's not a problem per se, just REALLY, REALLY annoying. I'm sure it
>has a simple solution, I just don't know where to look.
>
just type:
biff n
in each terminal that you do not want to be notified in, or put biff n
in you shell rc script, for bash: .bash_profile or .bashrc and then
type in:
biff y
in the terminal that you do want to be notified in.
Since .bash_profile is only executed by interactive logins I put the
following in it:
numlogins=`who |
egrep "$LOGNAME" |
wc -l`
case $numlogins in
*"0"*|*"1"*)
;;
*) echo "login number $numlogins for $LOGNAME, messages and biff off";
mesg n;biff n
;;
esac
this turnes both email notification and messages off for all but my
first login. This can not be in .bashrc or any rc file that is read
by non interactive logins. ie scp will no longer be able to transfer
files if this is in .bashrc
Jack
(that might have been overkill but it was my first reply so...)
------------------------------
From: "Evangelos K. Koutsavdis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NIC for Linux
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:06:52 -0500
==============1CA2BEA4816CD1F0825BB775
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi,
I am new with Linux networking, so my question may sound very basic.
I checked with my future cable modem provider (I mean the cable company,
which is MediaOne, if this makes any difference) and they suggest the
3Com Etherlink III as the preferable NIC card. Ofcourse, they have a Win
enviroment in mind. I was wondering, if the NIC that they suggest is
compatible with Linux ver. 5.0 which I have, or should I buy another one.
A relative question is the following. I will use my PC in order to connect
to some university Unix servers and do some file postprocessing there. I was
wondering, if I could get the graphical output of the postprocessing displayed
in my home PC monitor and how should I go about doing that since the ISPs do not
give you a static IP adress. I am also worried whether the speed is going
to be high enough so that I can have the output fast on my screen. If anybody
has had any experience with this or any of the above questions, I would appreciate
a reply.
Thank you.
--
######################################################################
Evangelos K. Koutsavdis
School of Aeronautics & Astronautics
Purdue University, 1282 Grissom Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1282
phone: 494-5144, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~koutsavd/
######################################################################
==============1CA2BEA4816CD1F0825BB775
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<pre>Hi,</pre>
<pre>I am new with Linux networking, so my question may sound very basic.</pre>
<pre>I checked with my future cable modem provider (I mean the cable
company,</pre>
<pre>which is MediaOne, if this makes any difference) and they suggest the</pre>
<pre>3Com Etherlink III as the preferable NIC card. Ofcourse, they have a Win</pre>
<pre>enviroment in mind. I was wondering, if the NIC that they suggest
is</pre>
<pre>compatible with Linux ver. 5.0 which I have, or should I buy another one.</pre>
<pre></pre>
<pre>A relative question is the following. I will use my PC in order
to connect</pre>
<pre>to some university Unix servers and do some file postprocessing there. I was</pre>
<pre>wondering, if I could get the graphical output of the postprocessing
displayed</pre>
<pre>in my home PC monitor and how should I go about doing that since the ISPs do
not</pre>
<pre>give you a static IP adress. I am also worried whether the speed is
going</pre>
<pre>to be high enough so that I can have the output fast on my screen. If
anybody</pre>
<pre>has had any experience with this or any of the above questions, I would
appreciate</pre>
<pre>a reply.</pre>
<pre></pre>
<pre>Thank you.</pre>
<pre>--
######################################################################
Evangelos K. Koutsavdis
School of Aeronautics & Astronautics
Purdue University, 1282 Grissom Hall, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1282
phone: 494-5144, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<A
HREF="http://roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~koutsavd/">http://roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~koutsavd/</A>
######################################################################</pre>
</html>
==============1CA2BEA4816CD1F0825BB775==
------------------------------
From: Aris CRuz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Firewall with 1 IP
Date: 25 Feb 1999 18:32:01 GMT
It is possible to have just one ip and more than one web server, the only
problem is that they will use different ip ports. The util you would use
is ipfwadm (for 2.0.X kernels) or ipchains (for 2.1.X or 2.2.X kernels).
Sorry to say, I am still trying to finish that project my self, so I can't
give you definate answers. But for more info, look @
http://www.ox.compsoc.org.uk/~steve/portforwarding.html
vartekquest wrote:
>
>
>
> - My ISP has asigned me 1 static IP.
> - I have a LAN, and 3 NT Web servers on it that I want to make
available to
> Inet with 192.168.X.X IPs.
>
> - I want to put a Linux RedHat 5.2 based firewall before the LAN.
>
> Would it be possible with just 1 IP, maybe with IP Masquerading or
should I
> ask for a Class C Network?
>
> Answers will be welcome by private e-mail.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your
Own
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
