Linux-Networking Digest #366, Volume #10 Wed, 3 Mar 99 13:14:09 EST
Contents:
Re: Problem level of PPP+linux 2.2.1? (Michel)
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Hans)
Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help (childsplay)
Watching a telnet session ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IP Forwarding + IP Masquerading + Security ("Donley P'Simer")
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Doug Goldstein)
Linux 2.2.2 and DOS ftp (Nick Pasich)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (benjamin j snyder)
pppd not 8-bit clean Please help! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** ("Howard")
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Doug Goldstein)
Re: IPCP: timout sending Config-Requests (Clifford Kite)
Re: IP Masquerading? Please Help ("George Georgakis")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Problem level of PPP+linux 2.2.1?
Date: 2 Mar 1999 20:53:01 -0600
Daren Scot Wilson wrote:
>
> I'm new to these newsgroups,would like the judgement of old timers: I'm
> wondering if the number of PPP problems related to the new linux 2.2.1 is
> the "normal level" of trouble routinely found here, or has there been a
> sharp rise from past levels? If the latter, would you attribute this to
> changes in the software, or a sharp rise in beginners?
>
> PPP has always worked fine for me, or at least nothing requiring spelunking
> the newsgroups, HOWTOs and everything, all through 1996, 1997, 1998, but
> suddenly with linux 2.2.1, kablewy!!!
>
> daren wilson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My own problems with ppp have started just after installing ppp-2.3.5-1
It worked great before that, the catch is that if you don't install this
you won't be able to use the new kernel.
What I found out is that if the PC has been on for too long I will not be able
to get a good internet connection. It connects and according to /var/log/messages
I had a nice clean connection. On the other hand I can't ping anything. Netscape
will load on the task list but that's about it. NcFTP may crash trying to connect
to a ftp site. Sometime I can connect after a lot of redial and tries of different
numbers but the connection to the internet doesn't stay. The modem doesn't hang up
just ppp seems to be dead. A reboot fixes things, for a while ...
Apparently PPP isn't an important issue as no one seem to either care or believe
that we have problems. I would love to know where the problem is.
--
Tired of Windows' rebootive multitasking?
then try Linux's preemptive multitasking
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
From: Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:49:29 +0100
It's working.
I'm beginning to understand a lot better how it works.
If I want it to work all the time I'll have to play with the ppp-up script (I guess)
because of my dynamic IP adress.
Thank you very much for your help.
Hans.
Rick Onanian wrote:
> Hans wrote:
> > Here's what I did to test (I'm on the 192.168.0.1 computer):
> > ipportfw -C
> > lynx http://192.168.0.1:80 (work's fine)
> > ipportfw -A -t 192.168.0.1/8080 -R 192.168.0.1/80
> ^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> There's your problem. You need to put the address that people will be
> trying to connect to (the one that's visible to the outside world) as
> the incoming address. Also, it looks like you've redirected it to
> itself - you need to forward it to _another_ machine.
>
> Your ipportfw command should be as follows:
>
> ipportfw -A -t 195.96.x.y:8080 -R 192.168.0.2/80
>
> where 195.96.x.y is your outside visible address; and 192.168.0.2 is
> the computer that's hosting the web page.
>
> Beware that you cannot test it from inside your private network. Email
> me for a shell account on my machine to test with, since it must be
> tested from outside.
>
------------------------------
From: childsplay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.ps.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 20:15:33 -0600
how do i make the start_masq file or edit it? I have no clue.
i did everything else, but still can't get the eth0 and ppp0
to work together. If i deactivate the eth0 i can connect to the net
if i deactivate the ppp0 i can do the internal networking stuff.
but they will not work together at the same time. This is very frustraiting
and i'm real close to giving up on linux.
David Kirkpatrick wrote:
> Charles,
> If you selected PPP and IP-Masquerading on the install then
> your in there. I assume you have ppp working and can dial in and
> that you can ping between machines.
> PPP wants to have the default route for itself so in Network
> Configuratior go to the Route option and make Default Gateway & D
> G Device blank. Click Netowrk Pack Forwarding on/selected. You
> should have your nameserver addresses entered in NAMES,
> nameservers.
> Edit a file start_masq. Put the following in there.
> ipfwadm -F -p masquerade
> modprobe ip_masq_irc
> modprobe ip_masq_ftp
> After ppp connects run start_masq and ping your other machines
> then ping from our subnet the ISP (get its # from ifconfig) -
> ping 10.number. If that works then try pinging form link
> boston.com. If that works then DNS is ok. Then ping from the
> subnet - masquerading should send it through.
> The masquerading command I have above leaves your connection
> open so read IP-Masquerading HOWTO on how to set it up properly.
>
> childsplay wrote:
> >
> > I really hope someone can help me cause IP Masqurading is apparently
> > what i need to do.
> > I was looking at the mini HOWTO on IPMasqurading, but it talks about
> > compiling the
> > kernal :( I have RedHat 5.2 with the 2.0.36 kernal. Can someone tell me
> > what i'm supposed to do?
> > Please. I'm still very new and i wanna get both of my pcs connected to
> > the net with the one connection
> > But the linux box will not let me use the eth0 and the ppp0 at the same
> > time. If i have the eth0 active the
> > ppp0 will not work, and if the ppp0 is active the eth0 will not work. I
> > am setting up everything
> > thru Xwindows cause i'm still fuzzy on all the command line stuff. All
> > the HOWTO's i read are based
> > off all the command line things which i dunno. Any way if anyone could
> > assist me with setting up
> > my 2 pcs to get connected to the net. Thank you very much in advanced.
> >
> > --
> > Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ICQ# 14539920 ============
> > ]TeamGameSpy[ ============
> > http://www.gamespy.com ===
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 14539920 ============
]TeamGameSpy[ ============
http://www.gamespy.com ===
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Watching a telnet session
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 02:50:54 GMT
Is there a way to watch whats going on in a telnet session in real time? Just
curious
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Donley P'Simer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Forwarding + IP Masquerading + Security
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:37:25 GMT
I have a Linux 2.0.36 Kernel running with IP Masquerading turned on and all
internal traffic being forwarded to the internet and masqueraded fine.
Here's my rc.firewall:
#!/bin/sh
#
# /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall, define the firewall configuration, invoked from
# /etc/rc.d/rc.local.
#
#Setup the firewall modules:
depmod -a
modprobe ip_masq_ftp
modprobe ip_masq_raudio
modprobe ip_masq_irc
#Setup the firwall rules:
ipfwadm -I -f
ipfwadm -I -p accept
ipfwadm -O -f
ipfwadm -O -p accept
ipfwadm -F -f
ipfwadm -F -p reject
# Masquerade from local net on local interface to anywhere.
ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -S 192.168.2.0/16 -D 0.0.0.0/0
This works great, but I am concerned about security. I do not run any
servers on the internal machines of the network (My Win98 box, and my wife's
iMac), but I'd like to know if this setup would allow any malicious users
into my network. It looks to me like only packets that originate from one of
my internal machines will be forwarded to the network and that all packets
will be accepted by the linux box. Am I vulnerable to "spoofing" or any
other cracker tricks?
TIA,
Donley
------------------------------
From: Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 03:22:40 GMT
Same here. I can't get mine to connect. Even people from outside can't connect.
Just to be safe I'm covering everything. I have an FTP server running on
192.168.1.2 port 22. The machine 192.168.1.1 is my Linux box with IP Masq on it and
ipportfw and all those tools.
/usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -C
/usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -u167.206.209.24/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
/usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -t167.206.209.24/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
/usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -u192.168.1.1/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
/usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -t192.168.1.1/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
/usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -L
Prot Local Addr/Port > Remote Addr/Port
UDP 167.206.209.24/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
UDP 192.168.1.1/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
TCP 167.206.209.24/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
TCP 192.168.1.1/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
And still everyone gets unable to connect to port 22. Same as Hans is getting.
Anyone have any ideas why?
Doug Goldstein
Hans wrote:
> Rick Onanian wrote:
>
> > Hans wrote:
> > > It's almost working, to test it I tried a redirection from port 8080 to
> > > port 80.
> > > Without the ipportfw I get an "unable to connect", but nothing happens with
> > > the redirection (I get a "making connection to ...:8080).
> >
> > You need to make sure that there's a service running on port 80 of the
> > end IP address. Also, make sure you chose the right IP - the IP is as
> > important as the port.
> >
> > --
> > rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
> > ---------------
> > My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
> > represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
> > ---
> > Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
> > beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
> > ---
> > Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
> > rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
>
> Here's what I did to test (I'm on the 192.168.0.1 computer):
> ipportfw -C
> lynx http://192.168.0.1:80 (work's fine)
> ipportfw -A -t 192.168.0.1/8080 -R 192.168.0.1/80
> lynx http://192.168.0.1:8080 (seems to hang).
>
> From the outside, http://195.96.x.y:80 (I have a dynamic IP address) works too,
> but http://195.96.x.y:8080 results in an "can not connect".
> Thanks for your time.
------------------------------
From: Nick Pasich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux 2.2.2 and DOS ftp
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 09:04:28 -0800
I have a small network with 1 Dos and 3 Linux boxes.
I upgraded one of the Linux machines to 2.2.2, the
others are running 2.0.36..
I am using NCSA FTP 2.3.08 and have had problems
with it hanging when using dir/ls and file transfers.
This only occurs on Linux 2.2.x and works great on 2.0.36.
Using Ftp between Linux/2.0.26 and Linux/2.2.2 works great...
I have changed to different ftpd's (wu.ftp, BeroFTPD, etc) -
all with the same problem.
I have also tried WATTCP FTP v0.65 that has the same problems.
NCSA Telnet works great as well as kermit....
I noticed that CONFIG_INET_PCTCP is not is the new tcp_input.c .
I have this activated in v2.0.36 .
Any help would be greatly appreciated........................
--
_ _
_ __ _ __ __ _ ___(_) ___| |__
| '_ \| '_ \ / _` / __| |/ __| '_ \
http://www.users.cts.com/sd/n/npasich
| | | | |_) | (_| \__ \ | (__| | | |
|_| |_| .__/ \__,_|___/_|\___|_| |_|@sd.cts.com
|_|
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (benjamin j snyder)
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 3 Mar 1999 16:56:10 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rob McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Christ, I can't believe I'm joining in here.
>
>"Andy Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Cheeses:
>> ...
>> knob
>> ...
>
Well, I might be jumping in late (just recently discovered this ng to be
precise), but here at my school we had a lot of different names.
One server is named organ (as in body parts), clients are eye, brain, skin,
lung, kidney, colon, etc. Another is deadrock (dead rock stars), clients are
bonham, vicious, morrison, cobain (etc). Another server named tribe, clients
include iriquois, cherokee, pawnee etc. Yet another server named tool, clients
include hammer, laith, etc. And even yet another server was building, clients
were hopsital, school, etc etc. Tree had elm, pine, cedar, oak (which made it
confusing sometimes when talking about elm or pine and not talking about the
email reader).
There were a ton of others too (We had a TON of machine names), but we're
switching platforms and all of that is changing now. It seems the way it was
done was to pick a theme (almost anything will work) and that is your server's
name, then the cliets are types of the server's name, or attributes. Right
now my desktop RH box is called Atlantis, it pretty much stands alone, but I
plan on adding machines to it and will probably change the name, and have norse
gods, or beers, something that I find myself intereted in at the time.
I am officially finished babbling about this for now.
later
--
Ben Snyder
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pppd not 8-bit clean Please help!
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 16:51:46 GMT
My connect script get's me logged onto my ISP, and then hands things
over to pppd which hangs up.
The /var/log/messages has the following in it:
11:10:09 lingate pppd[368]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
11:10:39 lingate pppd[368]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
11:10:39 lingate pppd[368]: Connection terminated.
11:10:39 lingate pppd[368]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
11:10:39 lingate pppd[368]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
11:10:39 lingate pppd[368]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
11:10:39 lingate pppd[368]: Exit
------------------------------
From: "Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:20:53 -0000
Uhh - is it me or don't you all have to enter a username and password EVERY
time you log onto the net.
You are also allocated a dynamic IP address which your ISP could easily
track.
You EVEN give your email to all and bloody sundry so they can spam you.
What difference does your chip going "Hi there" make ??
To me - sod all !
IF however you are some juvenile machine cracker then tough shit - sod Intel
finding out who you are - do my machine and I will find you out.
Thats my whinge over anyway.
Chris Tilbury wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Bill Frisbee wrote:
>
>> Bah... Sun knows EVERYTIME I turn my system on tracked by that host id
which
>> is PART of the CPU and hardcoded to the CPU.
>
>No, you're wrong. The hostid is taken (on Sun hardware) from the ID PROM
>on the CPU board. It's not hardcoded into the CPU itself. On Intel
>systems running Solaris, I'm not so sure.
>
>I'd be very interested to why you think Sun know whenever you turn your
>machine on. Or why you believe that they could possibly give a toss about
>it enough to bother? Last time I checked, there wasn't an
>
>/etc/init.d/bigbrother
>
>script that emailed them.
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>
>
>Chris
>
>--
> All opinions stated in this message are my own. Hands off!!
>Chris Tilbury, UNIX Systems Administrator, IT Services, University of
Warwick
>MAIL:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/Chris.Tilbury
------------------------------
From: Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 03:39:48 GMT
Correction. The FTP lets the user log in. But after they log in they get a "no responce
from server" error. Now what's with that?
Doug Goldstein
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Same here. I can't get mine to connect. Even people from outside can't connect.
> Just to be safe I'm covering everything. I have an FTP server running on
> 192.168.1.2 port 22. The machine 192.168.1.1 is my Linux box with IP Masq on it and
> ipportfw and all those tools.
>
> /usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -C
> /usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -u167.206.209.24/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
> /usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -t167.206.209.24/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
> /usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -u192.168.1.1/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
> /usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -A -t192.168.1.1/22 -R 192.168.1.2/22
> /usr/local/sbin/ipportfw -L
> Prot Local Addr/Port > Remote Addr/Port
>
> UDP 167.206.209.24/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
>
> UDP 192.168.1.1/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
>
> TCP 167.206.209.24/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
>
> TCP 192.168.1.1/22 > 192.168.1.2/22
>
> And still everyone gets unable to connect to port 22. Same as Hans is getting.
> Anyone have any ideas why?
>
> Doug Goldstein
>
> Hans wrote:
>
> > Rick Onanian wrote:
> >
> > > Hans wrote:
> > > > It's almost working, to test it I tried a redirection from port 8080 to
> > > > port 80.
> > > > Without the ipportfw I get an "unable to connect", but nothing happens with
> > > > the redirection (I get a "making connection to ...:8080).
> > >
> > > You need to make sure that there's a service running on port 80 of the
> > > end IP address. Also, make sure you chose the right IP - the IP is as
> > > important as the port.
> > >
> > > --
> > > rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
> > > ---------------
> > > My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
> > > represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
> > > ---
> > > Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
> > > beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
> > > ---
> > > Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
> > > rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
> >
> > Here's what I did to test (I'm on the 192.168.0.1 computer):
> > ipportfw -C
> > lynx http://192.168.0.1:80 (work's fine)
> > ipportfw -A -t 192.168.0.1/8080 -R 192.168.0.1/80
> > lynx http://192.168.0.1:8080 (seems to hang).
> >
> > From the outside, http://195.96.x.y:80 (I have a dynamic IP address) works too,
> > but http://195.96.x.y:8080 results in an "can not connect".
> > Thanks for your time.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: IPCP: timout sending Config-Requests
Date: 2 Mar 1999 21:37:46 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<snip>
: This month, I upgrade my kernel to 2.2.2 and pppd to 2.3.5 in my computer
: and, using the same connection script:
: pppd connect 'chat -v "" ATDPXXXXXXX CONNECT "" ogin: usertest sword: *******
: User: network' /dev/cua2 115200 debug modem crtscts defaultroute
: I couldn't connect. My modem is a USRobotics Courrier X2 V.Everything 56K and
: the another guy is a USRobotics NetServer talk just PPP protocol and without
: any kind of compression method enabled. The only obs is the fact that I
: expect my IP from it. All the messages showed in file /var/log/messages when
: I'm trying to connect with new pppd (2.3.5) and the new kernel (2.2.2) are:
: pppd[524]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua2 Feb 19 08:16:45 localhost pppd[524]:
: IPCP: timeout sending Config-Requests Feb 19 08:16:46 localhost pppd[524]:
: Hangup (SIGHUP) Feb 19 08:16:46 localhost pppd[524]: Modem hangup Feb 19
: 08:16:46 localhost pppd[524]: Connection terminated. Feb 19 08:16:47
: localhost pppd[524]: Exit. Feb 19 08:18:29 localhost kernel: PPP: ppp line
: discipline successfully unregistered
Two things come to mind. One is that some USR modems need AT&F1
initialization. The other is that you may need to specify the pppd
option "asyncmap 0" for ppp-2.3.5, it was the default in ppp-2.2.0 but
this changed and is causing some people trouble. It may be the reason
for the failure that occurs in the IPCP negotiations.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* I gave up on politics when no matter who I voted for, I regretted it.
* -- Pepper...and Salt, WSJ */
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.ps.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading? Please Help
Date: 3 Mar 1999 04:48:18 GMT
Have a look at http://www.indyramp.com/mirrors/ipmasq/rh5setup.html
Whilst it is written for RedHat, the instructions are valid for Slackware
too. And it's all on the one page :)
Basically, you just edit the ONE file /etc/rc.d/rc.local with the commands
listed (depending on your internal network address), make sure that your
etrhernet works, and you're set. Make sure that all other machines
recognise your gateway machine, and that you include the IP address(es) of
your ISP in the /etc/resolv.conf file of your other machines. Mine shows
search ozemail.com.au
nameserver 203.2.193.124
nameserver 203.2.192.124
nameserver 192.168.1.2
Good luck
George
--
============================================================================
====================================
I never reply by email as a) I don't give out my real email address freely,
and b) it stops other NG users from reading the solutions to problems
I can be contacted thru hurro(a)hotmail.com
childsplay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> how do i make the start_masq file or edit it? I have no clue.
> i did everything else, but still can't get the eth0 and ppp0
> to work together. If i deactivate the eth0 i can connect to the net
> if i deactivate the ppp0 i can do the internal networking stuff.
> but they will not work together at the same time. This is very
frustraiting
> and i'm real close to giving up on linux.
>
> David Kirkpatrick wrote:
>
> > Charles,
> > If you selected PPP and IP-Masquerading on the install then
> > your in there. I assume you have ppp working and can dial in and
> > that you can ping between machines.
> > PPP wants to have the default route for itself so in Network
> > Configuratior go to the Route option and make Default Gateway & D
> > G Device blank. Click Netowrk Pack Forwarding on/selected. You
> > should have your nameserver addresses entered in NAMES,
> > nameservers.
> > Edit a file start_masq. Put the following in there.
> > ipfwadm -F -p masquerade
> > modprobe ip_masq_irc
> > modprobe ip_masq_ftp
> > After ppp connects run start_masq and ping your other machines
> > then ping from our subnet the ISP (get its # from ifconfig) -
> > ping 10.number. If that works then try pinging form link
> > boston.com. If that works then DNS is ok. Then ping from the
> > subnet - masquerading should send it through.
> > The masquerading command I have above leaves your connection
> > open so read IP-Masquerading HOWTO on how to set it up properly.
> >
> > childsplay wrote:
> > >
> > > I really hope someone can help me cause IP Masqurading is apparently
> > > what i need to do.
> > > I was looking at the mini HOWTO on IPMasqurading, but it talks about
> > > compiling the
> > > kernal :( I have RedHat 5.2 with the 2.0.36 kernal. Can someone tell
me
> > > what i'm supposed to do?
> > > Please. I'm still very new and i wanna get both of my pcs connected
to
> > > the net with the one connection
> > > But the linux box will not let me use the eth0 and the ppp0 at the
same
> > > time. If i have the eth0 active the
> > > ppp0 will not work, and if the ppp0 is active the eth0 will not work.
I
> > > am setting up everything
> > > thru Xwindows cause i'm still fuzzy on all the command line stuff.
All
> > > the HOWTO's i read are based
> > > off all the command line things which i dunno. Any way if anyone
could
> > > assist me with setting up
> > > my 2 pcs to get connected to the net. Thank you very much in
advanced.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ICQ# 14539920 ============
> > > ]TeamGameSpy[ ============
> > > http://www.gamespy.com ===
> >
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ICQ# 14539920 ============
> ]TeamGameSpy[ ============
> http://www.gamespy.com ===
>
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
