Linux-Networking Digest #366, Volume #11 Tue, 1 Jun 99 15:13:45 EDT
Contents:
3 Computers with one modem (Hans Goetz)
Q: NFS server problem w. 2.2.9 knfsd-1.3.1 (Bernd Kratz)
Re: need help configuring Linux as a Router (Mike Selders)
Re: A question about collisions (Terry Aardema)
Installing a 2nd Ethernet card (Michael Mellinger)
Mail Retrieval @isp --> 1 pop for a whole company... (Herman Willekens)
netatalk - can't change passwords ("constantin")
sendmail ("Jeff")
Re: Warning against Announce Communications web hosting (Buddy Donnelly)
Two PC's one modem ? (Matt)
ISDN TA CONFIGURATION FOR LINUX (pawan)
IMAP software for the linux (pawan)
Re: I cant ping with RedHat 5.2 (DeLinuxMan)
Re: Installing a 2nd Ethernet card (Michael Mellinger)
Re: Running X Applications under Win95 (Matt)
Re: twisted pair problem using a hub (Nicholas E Couchman)
Re: PPP to ISP fails ("marc*")
Re: DNS server problems ("Carl R. Friend")
Re: Connecting Redhat through an NT server ("Mike Somerville")
newbie Apache question: How do I allow CGI execution in any directory? (Brian
Wagener)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hans Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3 Computers with one modem
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 17:29:35 +0200
Hello out there!
Being a totaly Linux newbie I'd like to get your support in following:
Have a 3 pc network connected by Surecom 10 MBit Ethernet Cards, that
I'd ran with one modem using WinGate.
I'd like to do the same under Linux.
My problems/questions:
1. SUSE Linux Yast doesn't notice the ethernetcard. While booting have
the message like "eth0 - unknown device" or like that.
2. Where and how can I make the network settings (and which ones ;-) )
to connect the computers?
3. Are the detailed Howtos, appreciated in German, for that kind of
problem.
If possible, answers via E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], else of course via NG
regards from Austria
Hans
------------------------------
From: Bernd Kratz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,linux.dev.kernel,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Q: NFS server problem w. 2.2.9 knfsd-1.3.1
Date: 1 Jun 1999 15:32:10 GMT
Hi,
I got some problems using a linux box as a
NFS server (knfsd) in a heterogenous
environment. There's one major problem
( server crashes very often), one
medium problem (heavy load on the server)
and one tiny problem (nfs_acl)
Here's the configuration:
1 x Solaris x86 2.6
(nisplus server running in YP comp. mode)
1 x Linux 2.2.9 SMP (nfs server, yp client)
based on RH 6.0 with knfsd-1.3.1
Hardware: 2x PII 400Mhz
512 MB Ram
RAID controller GDT 6524
with 50 GB RAID
2x Adaptec 7895 SCSI
2x 3Com Vortex Boomerang
Every client got about 5 dirs. mounted from
the server. The clients OS's are:
3 x SPARC UltraII Solaris 2.6 (NIS+ client)
mount options:
vers=2,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,bg,soft
2 x x86 Solaris 2.6 (NIS+ client)
mount options:
vers=2,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,bg,soft
1 x SPARC SS1000E Solaris 2.5.1 (NIS+ client)
Patchlevel 103640-12
(can't be patched higher or upgraded)
mount options:
vers=2,rsize=8192,wsize=8192,bg,soft
5 x Linux SuSE 6.0 (2.0.36) (YP client)
mount options:
rsize=8192,wsize=8192,bg,soft,time=10
(no changes to the mount programm)
6 x Linux SuSE 6.1 (2.2.5) (YP client)
mount options:
rsize=8192,wsize=8192,bg,soft,time=10
(no changes to the mount programm)
and couple of WinNT and W95 boxes via samba
(that's no problem)
Desription of the big problem:
The server performs well with 5 clients
( 1 SS1000E, 1 x86 Solaris , 1 Solaris 2.6
2 Linux boxes)
If I activate the rest, the server runs a
few minutes and the it seems to be frozen.
It reacts on ping request, but the rest is
dead. I can't login via console. It reacts
still on ALT-PrtSrc for a process dump.
This shows, that the lockd daemon is one
of the process, who is running on one
CPU at the time of a crash.
Description of the medium problem:
When running a bonnie over a NFS mounted
directory on a client, the server load
climbs up to an load of 3 per bonnie.
If the load is over 10, then the bonnie on
the linux boxes crashes with an I/O error.
(Increasing the timeout on the client site
per mount options got no effect.)
The solaris boxes seems to ignore it.
Description of the tiny problem:
The servers prints the "normal" warning for
ACL rpc port (nfs_acl)
Now I got some questions:
- Is there a chance to fix the major
problem with 2.2.9-ac1 in conjuction
with knfsd-1.3.2
- Do I need some other things ?
(e.g. new nfs client packages for
the linux boxes)
Please send answers also via email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks in advance,
ben
--
Micromata GmbH http://www.micromata.de
Bernd Kratz email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ochsh�userstr.45 phone: +49-(0)-561-57063-13
D-34123 Kassel fax..: +49-(0)-561-57063-19
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 10:34:15 -0600
From: Mike Selders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: need help configuring Linux as a Router
mango wrote:
> can someone help me configure RH Linux 6 as a router?
IP routing?
man route
man ifconfig
Also, you should play around with the network configuration tool in the
control-panel.
> what's the difference between IP Masquerading and IP routing?
Routing decides what traffic goes through which interface or gateway in
order to get to the appropriate desitination host or network. Routing
is the facility that allows different networks to communicate with each
other. IP Masquerading is allowing an entire network (like a small
office LAN) to share a single IP address (like one that your ISP assigns
to you). IP Masquerading does need routing, but Routing doesn't
normally require Masquerading. If you are looking to Masquerade, you
will also want man ipfwadm.
-- Mike Selders, Network Administrator
______________________________________
Clark & Thompson Online Services, Inc.
http://www.ctos.com
------------------------------
From: Terry Aardema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: A question about collisions
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 09:21:03 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pat Crean wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 May 1999, CF wrote:
> >I have been wondering the same thing, and wondering about buying a switch.
> >
> >We have 1/2% to 1.5% collisions. One reply here says under 5% is ok,
> >another says "nearly 100%" is ok.
> >
> >Is there any consensus on this?
> >
> >CaryF
> >
>
> Actually, what I was trying to say is not that a 100% collision rate is ok, but
> that, even with 100% collisions, performance doesn't take too big a hit.
> Consider 10Mb/s ethernet (I don't have even crude numbers on 100 Mb/s usage).
> An ethernet packet is just over 1500 bytes long. If every packet transmitted
> results in a collision, then all packets are lengthened by 40 bytes (collisions
> only occur at the beginning of transmission and are guaranteed to be detected
> within that 40 byte window). This decreases your maximum throughput from 10
> Mb/sec to 1500/1540 * 10 Mb/s, or 9.74 Mb/s. Obviously, this is horribly
> simplified, but I think it does help put collisions into perspective. On my
> test network (dirt cheap 10 Mb/s hub and 2 linux boxes), I run an X server on
> one machine and X applications on the other. Even with 25% collisions, I can
> maintain an ftp transfer rate of 1100 KBytes/sec between the two boxes without
> noticing any sluggishness. I haven't tried at 100 Mb/s --- I suspect that the
> higher speed would decrease the number of collisions, while the larger
> collision detection window would increase the penalty for those collisions.
A little too simplistic...
Minimum Ethernet packet size = 48(? I could be wrong, but I know I'm
close!) bytes
Maximum Ethernet packet size = 1500 bytes (for 10baseX, larger for
100baseT(X))
A collision can *theoretically* occur at any time during the
transmission of the packet, but if you stay within the cable length
limits (185m for 10base2, 100m for 10baseT) you will detect a collision
within the minimum packet size window. Therefore, actual impact on the
network is very complex to determine, as it depends on the average size
of the packets (not the maximum size!), and every network is different,
and even the same network is different at different times.
The rough rule-of-thumb I use is that a 10baseX network approching 50%
is in serious trouble; you can count on 25-75% of packets to collide
then, and remember that each collision causes at least two packets to be
re-sent, thereby making the problem worse. The 50% point is flexible;
the smaller the average packet size, the *worse* the collision problem
becomes (more packets/unit-time = more chances to collide).
A collision rate of 1/3% (as the original poster had) is completely
acceptable (and is very low); the time to worry about collision rates is
when they are *high* (for some definitions of *high*) *AND* you are
getting other errors (i.e. dropped packets, checksum errors). These
problems feed on each other; a dropped packed requires a re-send, which
collides, which requires a re-send, which is dropped, which requires a
re-send, ...
Terry Aardema
Systems and Network Manager
Natural Resources Canada/Canadian Forest Service/Northern Forestry
Center
#include <disclaimer.h>
------------------------------
From: Michael Mellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Installing a 2nd Ethernet card
Date: 01 Jun 1999 12:53:22 -0400
I'm installing a 2nd ethernet card, a LinkSys combo card. My first
card is a 3Com 3c509 card. I can get the LinkSys card to work if I
build RedHat 6.0 with only that card installed. However, when I built
my system with the 3com card and tried to add the Linksys
card(ne2000), I get an error message: "Delay Initialization" when I
try to start it. Linux doesn't see the card upon bootup either.
There is no interrupt in /proc/interrupts. Any ideas?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.archonmedia.com/antique_forum
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herman Willekens)
Subject: Mail Retrieval @isp --> 1 pop for a whole company...
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 14:10:16 GMT
How should this be done in a decent (easily maintainable) way ?
All mail for company goes into [EMAIL PROTECTED], we are
running a local sendmail daemon, and mail should be delivered in the
appropriate mailboxes fi [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but actually everything arrives in a big, messy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free beer for the best solution ...
------------------------------
From: "constantin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netatalk - can't change passwords
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 16:06:57 +0200
Hi, there,
on our new Linux-file-server I have installed SuSE 6.1 german and Netatalk
1.4b2+asun2.0a18.2.
my afpd.conf reads this way:
- -transall -noguest -cleartxt -setpassword -savepassword
Mac-Filesharing and Mac-user authentification via Netatalk seems to work,
but there is one thing that bothers me about the password-thing: The
Mac-Users cannot change their passwords on the Linux machine. Why?
Can anybody help?
Thank you in advance.
Constantin
________________________________________
Goelz & Schwarz GmbH, Munich
Tel.: +49 089 544 670 35
Fax.: +49 089 544 670 10
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.goelz.com
________________________________________
------------------------------
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sendmail
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 13:13:36 -0700
This there any good documentation on setting up sendmail as a mail
server(pop3)
I have just installed RH6.0 and want to set it up as our web/mail server but
cant find any good books or docs on setting it up.
Thanks,
Jeffrey Mack
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Buddy Donnelly)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.linux.network
Subject: Re: Warning against Announce Communications web hosting
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 13:48:30 GMT
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999 12:26:07, agner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit dans un
message:
> Since Allen Hoffman of Announce Communications has announced his web
> hosting business here I feel it is appropriate to warn you about my bad
> experiences with this business.
>
> The business is cheap, but service is extremely poor. Severe errors are
> only fixed after many complaints, and less severe errors are never fixed
> at all. Most E-mails are never answered. But worst of all: if you are
> dissatisfied and want to move to another service provider, you may not
> be able to transfer your domain name.
>
> My story is:
> I have bought a domain web site at Announce Communications. In april my
> site went down because mr Hoffman failed to pay the Internic bill. All
> my complaints remained unanswered. After a month I decided that I had to
> move my domain to another ISP. Only after he learned that I was moving
> the domain did I hear from mr Hoffman. Do you think it was an apology?
> Or an offer to refund what I had paid for a faulty service? No - you
> can't guess it. It was a demand that I pay him 70$ for releasing my
> domain! My question is now: is it possible to move the domain without
> his permission? The internic record has my name as registrant, and his
> name as administrative contact.
The way it has worked in the past with Network Solutions, any of the
contacts listed could apply for the transfer. They will email a notice to
each of the other contacts listed, if you don't provide them with the
"permission" from the start, and if they don't hear anything back they'll
go ahead and do what you ask for.
If your turkey objects in writing, then it won't be automatic; they'll go
through a further examination. If you can show that the domain does
actually belong to you, then you'll win. I've never heard of them allowing
outsiders to object to changes in a domain registration on purely money
issues.
That's as it has been. Things are changing now, so you should get in touch
with them right away and get the ball rolling.
Good luck,
Buddy
Buddy Donnelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Two PC's one modem ?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 15:25:56 +0100
Hi,
How do you connect 2 PC's using one modem without swapping the
connectors out of the PC's. Is there a cost effective way of doing
this without buying a switch ?
ie 2 nine pin connectors to one 9 pin connector would this work ?
Or is there a networking solution to this ie connect from the NT
box and not via Linux or the otherway around.
Setup.. 1 x NT box, 1 x Linux box, 1 x 3com Message modem.
Could someone please email me the solution ?
Many thanks
Matt
------------------------------
From: pawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISDN TA CONFIGURATION FOR LINUX
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 23:38:52 +0530
Reply-To: pawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi
I have tried to configure the ISDN dail in connectivity for the linux
with the ISDN TA on my serial port.
The dial in connection get established from a windows machine and the PAP
authentication takes place with pppd interface going up .
But i am not able to ping on that interface or nor i am able to browse
from the windows machine.
But the same setup is working with the normal analog modem.
Pls provide the necessary help.
thanks
pawan
------------------------------
From: pawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IMAP software for the linux
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 23:39:52 +0530
Reply-To: pawan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi
Is there any package which will have the IMAP support for the linux
machine
thanks
pawan
------------------------------
From: DeLinuxMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I cant ping with RedHat 5.2
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 14:29:35 GMT
Leland Brode wrote:
> This is not an answer -- however I am having the identical problem with the
> identical Ethernet card. I can't ping to the machine (times out) and I
> can't ping anything from the Linux machine (it just hangs). The network and
> the card are fine because the problem machine does connect and is pingable
> when booted to Windows 95. I have reinstalled, reconfigured, read several
> books, etc.
>
> Confused,
> Leland.
>
I have the exact opposite problem. My Linux box can ping everything
but itself. Win98 boxes can ping the Linux server and the Linux can
ping all Win98 boxes. But from The Linux box, a ping to it's own name
or IP address tells me that the network is not accessable. This used to work
but I have installed several programs including Samba v2 since the
last time that I saw the "ping myself" work. (Samba works fine).
Clearly, I screwed something up...but what?
I suspect that this is really simple and dumb problem, but I'm pretty
clueless about the details of networking. I installed Linux 5.1 from
CD, taking most of the defaults and adding only my machine name
and IP, etc. If anyone can give me a clue and a pointer to the solution,
I'll be very thankful. I've read the "HowTo"s that I thought were appropriate,
but didn't understand what to look for................
johnd
------------------------------
From: Michael Mellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing a 2nd Ethernet card
Date: 01 Jun 1999 14:17:25 -0400
I thought that the cards were ne2000 compatible. When I add
alias eth1 ne
to the /etc/conf.modules and I set the options like with the io and irq
it seems that these values are ignored at boot time. When I run dmesg
it seems to think that the irq is 0.
-Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange) writes:
> Assuming you have compiled the tulip module and installed it into
> the modules directory:
>
> Try adding
>
> alias eth1 tulip
> to /etc/conf.modules
>
> if the linksys is your second card and you are using the tulip module.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.archonmedia.com/antique_forum
------------------------------
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Running X Applications under Win95
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 15:31:55 +0100
Yep, vnc is great, but there are others too.
vnc setup..
download the server for linux and the one for windows (viewer)
on the Linux end after de-taring type
export DISPLAY=:1
vncserver :1
It may ask for passwords to the server but that is fine
on the windows end click on the vnc viewer and enter either the domain
name of the linux box or the IP address then :1 (ie <IP address>:1)
type in the password and away you go.
x setup is simular I now have kde working and its great.
(Cheers to Bob and all who sorted me out in the first place).
Matt
Bob G wrote:
> Hugh Saunders wrote:
> >
> > Is there any way to remotely run X applications under Windows? ie Can I get
> > my linux server to do all the processing and work on my Windows machine? It
> > must be possible 'cos I remember using X-Terminals which did the same sort
> > of thing.
>
> There are a variety of X server packages for Windows (see Tucows), or
> you might give VNC a try. It's a "full screen" package that allows you
> to share the X console among multiple sessions. The beatiful thing is
> that you can close the vncviewer on one Windows box and pick up where
> you left off on another.
>
> See www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/index.html for more details.
>
> - Bob
------------------------------
From: Nicholas E Couchman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: twisted pair problem using a hub
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 18:08:02 GMT
When I had a small network w/ a hub (now I have coax ethernet setup), one cable
that came out of the hub was a cross over cable and the other two or three
cables were straight through cables. This worked perfectly, alomost without
collisions. If you use two striaght cables, make sure your hub is set to
crossover mode (X no =).
--Nick
Heiko Hellweg wrote:
> "Ron van Middendorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Are you using the same cable?
> > If so, this is a crossed one (since it worked without a hub) and this will
> > not work through the hub....
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > > As soon as
> > > more than just a little traffic occurs (say a ftp file transfer of a
> > > 1MB file, no matter which direction) i get lots of frame collisions
> > > (that may be acceptable) which result in 5 to 10 second delays in
> > > which no network traffic can pass the ethernet at all ... :-(
>
> no i don't - i use two straight cables of course.
> while it basically works, it produces a lot of timeouts, so a 1M file
> transfer takes about 5 minutes or more.
> --
> ---------------------------- Heiko Hellweg ---------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~hellweg/
> 10% of our customers account for 90% of our service cost: those who
> actually use our product, plus the ones who were injured unpacking it.
------------------------------
From: "marc*" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP to ISP fails
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 19:44:28 +0200
may you should add the ppp0 protocol
Under X type netcfg as root and then add ppp0 and fill in the gaps.
marc.
Andy Greenshaw a �crit dans le message <7j103s$5ms$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am having problems connecting to my ISP from Linux. The dial-in is OK and
>all initial negotiation is OK, but then my Linux box requests termination
of
>the link with "No network protocols running".
>
>Below is the relevant contents of the /var/log/messages file.
>
>----------------
>
>Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
>Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop kernel: registered device ppp0
>Jun 1 13:33:17 desktop pppd[661]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: abort on (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATE1QV1^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: ATE1QV1^M^M
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: OK
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>Jun 1 13:33:18 desktop chat[665]: send (ATH0^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (OK)
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ATH0^M^M
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: OK
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: send (ATDT08450796699^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: expect (CONNECT)
>Jun 1 13:33:19 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: ATDT08450796699^M^M
>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: CONNECT
>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: expect (ogin:)
>Jun 1 13:33:44 desktop chat[665]: 42666/ARQ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: User Access Verification^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login:
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (???????????????^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (assword:)
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: login: ???????????^M
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: Password:
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: send (????????????^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:45 desktop chat[665]: expect (system.)
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: ^M
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Entering PPP mode.^M
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Async interface address is unnumbered
>(FastEthernet0)^M
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Your IP address is 62.136.161.36. MTU is
>1500 bytes^M
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: Header compression will match your
>system.
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: -- got it
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop chat[665]: send (^M)
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set dbg flags to 70000
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Serial connection established.
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Using interface ppp0
>Jun 1 13:33:46 desktop pppd[661]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap a0000
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070003
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f070000
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connection terminated.
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop pppd[661]: Connect time 0.1 minutes.
>Jun 1 13:33:47 desktop kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
>Jun 1 13:33:48 desktop pppd[661]: Exit.
>
>--------------------
>
>And here is what appears on screen:
>
>--------------------
>
>
>Serial connection established.
>Using interface ppp0
>Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
>sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x42 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
><accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c 54 49 4c 49 4e
>4b>]
>sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x42 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 11 01 46 52 45 45 2d 4d 55 4c
>54 49 4c 49 4e 4b>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0x23eac2b9> <pcomp>
<accomp>]
>rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x43 <asyncmap 0xa0000> <magic 0x209e88c5> <pcomp>
><accomp>]
>sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network protocols running"]
>rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
>Connection terminated.
>Connect time 0.1 minutes.
>
>-------------------
>
>Any help much appreciated.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Carl R. Friend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS server problems
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 17:42:16 +0000
CF wrote:
>
> Our new DNS server:
> Works locally. NSlookup find both DNs assigned on the machine and
> remote DNs.
> Can be interogated by DNS elsewhere (our ISP) who returns the info
> as we assigned it for registered domain names.
> Will NOT report a remote DN to the exteral (W98 or netserver on our
> network) machine.
>
> Any Ideas???
Can you resolve _anything_ outside the zones for which you are
authoritative for? If not, I'd suspect that your hints file isn't
up-to-date or your DNS server may be configured so it isn't loading
it.
Here's the bottom section of my machine here:
zone "." {
type hint;
file "root.cache";
};
The root.cache file may be obtained from
ftp://nic.ddn.mil/netinfo/root-servers.txt
--
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~crfriend/museum/ | ICBM: N42:21 W71:46 |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------
From: "Mike Somerville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connecting Redhat through an NT server
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 13:45:39 -0400
I want to do the same thing, however it has beet put on the back burrner for
a few reasons. but I have heard in somewhere that samba 2.x will support
domain logins. don't quote me on it. go to www.samba.org and see what they
say.
--
Knowledge is power...
Power is knowledge...
Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:LZG43.2125$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello!
>
> When you are logging on NT domain you use Windows 95 client for Microsoft
> Networks.
> When you are using Linux workstation it picks up Ip address from DHCP
> server, also it can relay on NT based DNS. You can setup a samba client to
> share files with your NT machines, but if you are talking about logging in
> NT domain and running NT login script and participating in domain as if
you
> are a WIn95 station... there is no such thing for Linux.
>
> Good luck!
>
>
> mike upham wrote in message <7iv4g9$b13$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I currently use Win95 to connect to an NT server, which assigns me an IP
> and
> >DNS server. It asks for a username, password, and domain to log in. I
> also
> >run Winsock Proxy Client.
> >
> >On a separate harddrive I installed RedHat 6.0 and can't get it to log
on.
> >I believe the DHCP client is getting an IP but it never asks me for my
> login
> >info. Do I need to run Samba for this? I read a bunch of HOWTO files
and
> >man pages and none seemed to address this situation. If anyone knows one
> >that does let me know. I know my ethernet card is recognized by linux
and
> >it works fine under windows.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Mike
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: Brian Wagener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: newbie Apache question: How do I allow CGI execution in any directory?
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 10:40:28 -0400
I am trying to allow CGI scripts to be executed in any directory but
I can't seem to get it to work, I tried puting "Options ExecCGI" in the
/ Directory options but nothing changes. Please let me know.
Thanks,
Bri
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
