Linux-Networking Digest #378, Volume #10 Thu, 4 Mar 99 11:13:42 EST
Contents:
Any experience with the 3com 3C?FE575BT ethernet card? (Jeffrey Veiss (CTG))
Re: Diald and cable modem? (Doug Goldstein)
Re: Sendmail Question! (Andrzej Filip)
Ether card ("babalas")
Re: Watching a telnet session ("Warren Rodie")
gnome ppp setup... (Darren King)
Linux Router/Firewall problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: HELP!Any Support for US Robotics 56K Win Modem ("Rufus V. Smith")
JetDirect: Linux-OK, Win/Samba-NG ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux Router/Firewall problem (Luca Filipozzi)
USR/3Com ISDN DataBurst Working? (Bob Emes)
dhcp and machine names-How to? ("JLS")
Re: host lookup fails (David Kirkpatrick)
identd logs: how to interpret? (Katherine Hosch)
Re: Diald not dialing after modem is shut off. (Mark Robinson)
Problems with Realtek 8139 NIC ("Warren Rodie")
Re: 3COM 3c905b and 100MBit- Solution ("Till Mommsen")
Re: identd logs: how to interpret? (Barry Margolin)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ("James Gaster")
Re: Linux NIS client bound to Ultrix NIS server: illegal port (Harald Fuchs)
ppp transmit error ("Will Hickman")
Re: Help Working under w95 but not under RH 5.2 Linux (James Youngman)
Re: How to telnet as root (James Youngman)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Jeffrey Veiss (CTG) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,linux.dev.laptop
Subject: Any experience with the 3com 3C?FE575BT ethernet card?
Date: 4 Mar 1999 07:56:41 -0500
***NOTE: Before you reply, remove "SPAMSUCKS" from my e-mail address.
Before I spend my hard earned money, has anyone out there been able to
get this card to work:
3com 10/100 FastEthernet CardBus PCMCIA card model 3CXFE575BT
There's also a 3CCFE575BT without the X-Jack, but they're most likely
the same card with a different interface.
I've been reading about the 575 series working with newer versions of
the pcmcia drivers, but nothing definite about this particular model.
Please contact me if there are any further questions via internet mail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you very much!
Jeffrey Veiss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) PO Box 5400
Network Engineer Princeton, NJ 08543-5400
Corporate Telecommunications (609) 818-3308
Bristol-Myers Squibb (609) 818-7814 (fax)
------------------------------
From: Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Diald and cable modem?
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 21:48:38 GMT
You don't use diald. Most cable modems you need to use DCHP. To log in you
use an external program developed for the RoadRunner network but it works on
all networks. If you are using OptOnline as your provider feel free to
e-mail me, since I seem to be the one getting all the questions on their
service with Linux and I'm running IP Masq over their system.
http://www.vortech.net/rrlinux/ You need to get rrlogind. Unless you are
on OptOnline. Which you only need to get DHCP setup.
Doug Goldstein
"Ren� Fosdal" wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have tried for a long time to set up diald to go through my cable
> modem. I know there is nothing to "dial" but I still need to open the
> connection to my ISP. How do I do that? Well, I have to telnet to a
> UNIX-machine provide username and password - works every time.
>
> All computers of this ISP have static IP adresses (I'm on the
> 192.168.79.0 subnet) and so is the gateway I need to use. However, the
> computer I have to telnet to is on the 192.168.30.0 subnet.
>
> What I want is to have diald to use a script which telnets my ISP and do
> the logon procedure BUT! when I need to close the connection this is
> also done using telnet and diald registers this as TCP/IP packets and
> will try to reopen the connection. How can I prevent this? Or more
> accuratly: can I prevent this?
>
> I really would like to do this open/close procedure automatically (I
> have a few computers at home which is using my Linux box as gateway
> using IP-masqaurading). It would be great if I did not have to use
> manual open/close of the connection.
>
> Any hints appreciated.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Rene Fosdal
------------------------------
From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail Question!
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 14:10:29 +0100
bounce all unrecognized addresses (virtusertable):
@the.domain error:nouser User unknown
bounce for one specific address (virtusertable):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] error:nouser User unknown
--
"Andrzej (Andrew) A. Filip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (backup)
Mark Cornhill wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to bounce email for virtual email addresses that
> don't exist within a domain. I am getting spammed because all non-existent
> addresses within a domain are being sent to root. I am running Sendmail
> 8.8.7 on Slackware 2.0.34. Any help with this would be greatly appreciated.
------------------------------
From: "babalas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ether card
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 04:34:17 GMT
I am running Redhat 5.2 and am new to Linux, can someone tell me how to
configure my ethernet card and get my cable modem to work. I am using the
@Home service and the card I have is an SMC EtherPower 8432T. Any help would
be appreciated. Can someone e-mail me with some help?
Thanks
Chirvan Edross
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Warren Rodie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Watching a telnet session
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 08:43:28 +1100
Probably easier than that would be to use something like ttysnoop, which
allows you to make a copy of the pty and watch what happens in real time.
Warren Rodie
David Kirkpatrick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>You can watch on the linux side with tcpdump -i eth0.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Is there a way to watch whats going on in a telnet session in real time?
Just
>> curious
>>
>> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>--
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Darren King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: gnome ppp setup...
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 21:47:04 +0000
I just finished my gnome install on my RH 5.0 system. I installed it
from a combination of rpms and tarballs so it should get interesting.
I set up my ppp connection using gnome ppp 0.3 but every time I
say to connect it doesn't do anything. It says something like 'starting
pppd' but it never dials or anything.
Am I missing anything obvious?
Darren King
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Router/Firewall problem
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 21:33:03 GMT
Hi.
I setup a linux system to a be a filtering firewall for a small network with
real inet addresses. I can ping a test system on the network from the
firewall, and from that system I can ping the IP assigned to eth1 on the
firewall(eth0 goes to the ADSL modem). The problem is, that's all I can do.
The test system can't see out of the network to any ip's, including the eth0
IP on the firewall. I compiled ip_forwarding into the kernel, and when I cat
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward, there is a 1, I then relaxed all my ipfwadm
rules to accept everything in and out. Still no dice. I know this is vague,
but does anyone know where my problem might lie? What should I look at next.
I have read all of the HOWTO's, and in the Firewall HOWTO, it says with just
forwarding compiled in, every packet should be forwarded no matter what,
which hasn't happened. Could it be my routing tables. I think I have the
defaults and such set right. Basically it's this
(This is for our real addresses)
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx eth1
127.0.0.0 lo
default eth0
Is there anything missing? Thanks for any help
Sean Leach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP!Any Support for US Robotics 56K Win Modem
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 17:00:59 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On 3 Mar 1999 03:11:39 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ellen603) wrote:
>
>>I'm new to the LINUX env. I have just installed Linux Slackware 3.5. I
have
>>been reading some documents regarding incompatiable modems, which from
what
>>they say Linux doesn't support any WIN modems. I have a US Robotics 56
Win
>>modem, is there anyone out there that is using this type of modem with
LINUX.
>>I would deeply appreciate any assistance.
>
>WINMODEMS are NOT real modems. They have no serial port. some of
>them have no firmware. Linux doesn't have modem firmware in it like
>the win dirvers for that modem. The windows drivers also emulate a
>serial port to connect the modem to. its called a WINmodem for a
>reason. They are designed to work ONLY in windows. hard luck man
With the regularity of this complaint, someone could make some money
with a linux driver for a winmodem.
Oh wait a minute, no he can't. Under GPL he'd have to give the driver
away.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JetDirect: Linux-OK, Win/Samba-NG
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 04:30:52 GMT
Hello, I just got done with a search for HP JetDirect problems and came up
with 400+ results. Since it is hard sifting through each postig for a
solution, I thought I'd let the subject explain some of the problem: * RedHat
5.1 is installed on the LAN. * Netware 3.x servers currently handle print
services. * Netware must go away soon. * Samba 2.0 (1.9 until last week) does
file sharing. * Printing to JetDirect ExPlus3 with Unix LPD works well from
the Linux Box. * Win95/98 clients see the printer on the Linux Box. *
Printing from Win95/98 generates an error and asks if I would like to use the
printer offline and also suggests that I restart my PC before using the
printer.
Could you cc: your responses to me?
Thanks.
Peter D'Souza
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Linux Router/Firewall problem
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:22:29 -0800
In article <7bk9qf$qik$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> (This is for our real addresses)
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx eth1
> 127.0.0.0 lo
> default eth0
>
> Is there anything missing? Thanks for any help
your routing table should look more like
host/network netmask gateway interface
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 lo
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
xxx.xxx.xxx.0 255.255.255.0 eth1
default 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.? eth1
This can be achieved by:
route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo
route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
route add -net xxx.xxx.xxx.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
route add default gw xxx.xxx.xxx.?
Hope this helps,
Luca
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Bob Emes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: USR/3Com ISDN DataBurst Working?
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 08:22:34 -0500
Has anyone got a 3Com external (via the parallel port) ISDN 128K
DataBurst unit working with Linux?
Thanks,
------------------------------
From: "JLS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dhcp and machine names-How to?
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 07:43:56 -0500
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Quiz question:
If the dhcpd.leases file knows the name of a machine it gave an ip to, how
can you update the caching only dns to allow pinging by name? i.e. my win
box receives it ip from my linux box but I can ping it by ip but not name.
Samba finds it and puts the name and ip together.
--
Jeffrey Sofferin
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: host lookup fails
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:09:49 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/etc/hosts is not filled in probably See NET-3-HOWTO. And check
man ftpaccess and ftp files in /etc.
Is etc/resolv.conf filled in with your ISP? See PPP-HOWTO.
Jan van der Lee wrote:
>
> I recently installed linux (RH 5.2) and the KDE and I'm quite
> impressed by it. One problem is annoying, however: an error is thrown
> when I type a hostname to connect the PC via ftp or telnet:
>
> ftp machine.foo.fr
> host lookup failed (or something like that, I'm not on Linux right now).
>
> There's no problem when I specify the IP address...
>
> I've a stand-alone PC and a ppp link to the net. I probably did
> something silly when installing the kernel or packages.
> Is some package missing?
> -Jan.
>
> --
> J. van der Lee
> reply to vanderlee at cig dot ensmp dot fr
> ---------------------------------- ----- --- -- -
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Katherine Hosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: identd logs: how to interpret?
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 08:14:17 -0600
Greetings.
Please forgive my ignorance, but I recently inherited a linux box and I
am unfamiliar with the identd. Suppose I have these entries in my linux
box (ipaddress AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA):
identd[23113]: from: BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB ( fqdnofmachine ) for: 7741, 23
identd[23113]: Successful lookup: 7741 , 23 : root.root
identd[23199]: from: CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC ( CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC) for: 14596, 23
identd[23199]: Successful lookup: 14596 , 23 : root.root
where BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB and CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC are ipaddresses of real
machines. Does this mean that there were successful root logins to the
linux box from those machines?
I would appreciate any insight in this regard :)
-- katherine hosch
Katherine Hosch, System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Computer Science 504-280-7190
University of New Orleans 504-280-7228
(fax)
New Orleans, LA 70148 504-723-6953
(pcs)
------------------------------
From: Mark Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Diald not dialing after modem is shut off.
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 18:52:38 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============55185084EBCA40572E0BD530
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Scott,
I believe that if diald tries to make a connection, and it cannot ,
after 2-3 tries, diald is disabled. The setting for that is in the diald
configuration file.
Mark
Scott W. Petesen wrote:
> A customer of mine shuts off the modem at night. After they turn it
> back on to dial the isp nothing happens, no lights no dialing,
> nothing. I had to kill diald and restart it again.
>
==============55185084EBCA40572E0BD530
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="vcard.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Mark Robinson
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vcard.vcf"
begin: vcard
fn: Mark Robinson
n: Robinson;Mark
email;internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt: ;0
x-mozilla-html: FALSE
version: 2.1
end: vcard
==============55185084EBCA40572E0BD530==
------------------------------
From: "Warren Rodie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with Realtek 8139 NIC
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 09:27:40 +1100
I have two of these (albeit cheap) cards in my machine and the problem I'm
is that every so often I get the following message.
kernel: eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0d 0000.
kernel: eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0d 2000.
Now this happens on both interfaces, but it hasn't happened on both at the
same time.
When these happens the interface can no longer be used. If I down the
interface then bring it back up is works again.
I'm using redhat 5.2 and the v1.04 9/22/98 version of the rtl8139.c: driver.
Now the page http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html mentions
that this might occur if the card is in a non-bus-master slot.
I'm using an old pentium 133 motherboard with only 3 PCI slots (all in use)
and wondering, Is there a workaround I can use so my network doesn't keep
dying?
=============================
Warren Rodie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Till Mommsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3COM 3c905b and 100MBit- Solution
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:08:28 +0100
Got the solution, worked for me:
- Compile new Kernel with 3C90x support as module
- install new Kernel
- put a line into /etc/conf.modules : options 3C95x options=12
there might be already a line that you just have to coment out.
Since I am not sitting here at my Linux Server check the right syntax of
"3C95x" by the "lsmod" command and use what it says there for your network
adapter. 12 sets the card to 100MBIT full duplex.
Cheers,
Till
Till Mommsen schrieb in Nachricht <7bkj46$u3q$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Got the same problem (see below, also posted in comp.os.linux.hardware).
>According to SuSE this is a known driver problem. They got info on their
web
>site
>
>http://www.suse.de/cgi-bin/sdbsearch_en?stichwort=3Com
>
>(search support datebase for 3Com)
>
>Maybe, we get our problem solved....
>
>Text of posting:
>Hi,
>
>I know, this problem is not new, but I would like to ask for some
experience
>with it, so I maybe don't have to install a new kernel on a Software
>bootable RAID1......
>
>I got a 3COM 3C905B-TX "Vortex" network adapter. It works only at 10M. Now
>this is known to be a driver problem, but (stupid as I am) when I built my
>RAID kernel I compiled the driver into the Kernel instead of having it as a
>module. Now, to my knowledge, setting any options in modules.conf doesn't
>help (options 3C59x options=12).
>
>The correct solution (I think) would be to compile a new kernel. But I am a
>little reluctant to do this as long as I am not sure whether this will
help.
>So please, encourage me... Would it help to test the option line by typing
>this line at the boot prompt?
>
>I am using SuSE 6.0/Kernel 2.0.36.
>
>Thanks for help
>
>Cheers,
>Till
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: identd logs: how to interpret?
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:21:31 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Katherine Hosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Greetings.
>
>Please forgive my ignorance, but I recently inherited a linux box and I
>am unfamiliar with the identd. Suppose I have these entries in my linux
>box (ipaddress AAA.AAA.AAA.AAA):
>
>identd[23113]: from: BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB ( fqdnofmachine ) for: 7741, 23
>identd[23113]: Successful lookup: 7741 , 23 : root.root
>identd[23199]: from: CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC ( CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC) for: 14596, 23
>identd[23199]: Successful lookup: 14596 , 23 : root.root
>
>where BBB.BBB.BBB.BBB and CCC.CCC.CCC.CCC are ipaddresses of real
>machines. Does this mean that there were successful root logins to the
>linux box from those machines?
No, it means that your machine made connections to port 23 on the remote
machines. They contacted your identd to find out the name of the user
making those connection, and it answered "root.root". So root on your
Linux box was making telnet connections to BBB and CCC.
--
Barry Margolin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GTE Internetworking, Powered by BBN, Burlington, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
------------------------------
From: "James Gaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:41:39 -0500
Reply-To: "James Gaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We use Monster Trucks, Bigfoot, Gravedigger, Predator... and we use a
picture of the truck as wall paper...
--
to reply remove _spamme_not
------------------------------
From: Harald Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Linux NIS client bound to Ultrix NIS server: illegal port
Date: 03 Mar 1999 17:40:09 +0100
In article <7bj224$8un$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Schwarz) writes:
> Harald Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> does Ultrix respond on an illegal (nonpriveleged?) port, and Linux does
>>> not like that? How can I resolve that problem? Would running a local slave
>>> server help?
>> Not necessary. Use ypbind_bsd instead of ypbind on your Linux box.
>> Works fine here.
> ypbind_bsd does not seem to be included with RedHat. What distribution
> are you running?
SuSE.
> Still I'm wondering whether accepting responses from unpriveleged ports
> does not constitute a security flaw.
Yes, it does - unless you sit behind a firewall.
------------------------------
From: "Will Hickman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp transmit error
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 16:34:55 -0600
Hello,
I've been having a problem for a while now that I just can't figure out.
We've got a 486 linux box in our office that acts as an IP Masq PPP gateway
to the internet for the handfull of other machines in the office. For the
most part sending and receiving (HTTP, FTP, POP, SMTP,...) works just fine.
But, sending large files (100K+) kills the PPP connection. Sometimes the
connection dies just when the transfer is started, and sometimes after 5-10
minutes into it. Receiving large files works just fine, only sending causes
the ppp connection to die.
When the connection dies syslog reports nothing special...
Mar 3 16:15:08 avalon pppd[9]: Modem hangup
Mar 3 16:15:08 avalon pppd[9]: Connection terminated.
Mar 3 16:15:09 avalon pppd[9]: Exit.
I tried using the kdebug option to get more information on what might be
happening, but nothing jumped out at me. (No obvious messages just before
the link dies)
Any ideas!? This is becoming a big problem for us since emails sent with
attachments aren't making it out...
RedHat 5.2 (2.0.36)
pppd version 2.3 patch level 5
USR 56K V.90 external faxmodem (although we only have a 28.8 connection
through our current ISP)
Thanks,
will
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Help Working under w95 but not under RH 5.2 Linux
Date: 02 Mar 1999 20:49:45 +0000
Rajat & Papia Goon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am using SMC PCI-NIC. In auto probing it finds it irq 11 and address
> 0xe800 hich matches
> with win95. If I run ifup it's giving delaying eth0 initialization. I am
> using smc9194 module. If
> I use ifconfig then
> SIOCSIFBRDADDR
> eth0 : interface not found
> I am desperately trying to make it work.
Check the module is still loaded, by using lsmod.
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to telnet as root
Date: 02 Mar 1999 23:15:31 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul) writes:
> Can anyone tell me how to allow root telnet access to a Linux box?
> I've added .rhosts file to root's home directory but it seems to be
> PAM authentication that is preventing it.
[james@periwinkle james]$ telnet periwinkle
Trying 10.0.42.1...
Connected to periwinkle.
Escape character is '^]'.
Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo)
Kernel 2.2.1 on an i586
login: james
Password:
Last login: Wed Jan 27 18:52:44 on tty1
Hello James!
[james@periwinkle james]$ su -
[root@periwinkle /root]#
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
