Linux-Networking Digest #388, Volume #10 Fri, 5 Mar 99 09:13:40 EST
Contents:
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: dls faster in Windows!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Browser doesn't see my local Apache server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IPFWADM/ IP Masq. / NIC Problem: Question ("Mike")
Re: Ethernet Problems (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: funny routing! (Erik Hensema)
Re: netware printers (Izak Burger)
Re: funny routing! (Erik Hensema)
Re: how to connect 3 computers? (Erik Hensema)
Re: RedHat 5.2 killed my SAMBA (David Kirkpatrick)
smb AND nt ("John Madden")
Re: Linux Router/Firewall problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Minimum PC spec for IP masquerading??? (Bob)
Re: Help with IP Routing Problem! (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: ^^^ Strange Sendmail Problem ^^^ ("Leopold Toetsch")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 27 Feb 1999 17:56:19 GMT
In comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix Greg Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My Metaframe cluster servers are named earth, wind, fire, and water.
> I started setting those up the day after I saw "The Fifth Element" :-)
Yes!
> NT Boxes are muppets, and the novell guy names his servers after planets
> and other celestial type stuff.
One company that I know of named Unix boxes in it's MIS department after
words that start with "mis".
misshape
mistake
mismatch
...and so on.
--
Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/
"You know, I think I can hear the machine screaming from here... \
'help me! hellpp meeee!'" - Heather Flanagan, 14:52:23 Wed Jun 10 1998
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dls faster in Windows!!
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 17:01:13 GMT
On Mon, 01 Mar 1999 07:27:02 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've been using linux (RH 5.2) for a couple of months now, and I love it. I've
>been able to, with help from the linux community, find a solution to all of
>the newbie problems associated with making linux comfortable to work with --
>except one.
>
>My download speeds are terrible when compared to Windows. In fact, my Windows
>PC delivers better performance with a 33.6k than my RH box delivers with a
>56k. (The RH box also ran windows and achieved very good dl speeds). Before
>you flame me please understand that I'm not blaming this on Linux, but on my
>inability to make it work at it's peak. I have read a number of FAQs/manuals,
>lurked in several newsgroups, searched dejanews, etc. without finding a
>satisfactory solution.
>
>Here is some sys. info:
>Red Hat 5.2, kernel 2.36
>Dialer: kppp (tried minicom & chat too)
>Modem: Best Data 56k V.90 external on ttyS1
>ppp-2.3.5-1
>
>setserial reports:
>/dev/ttyS1, UART: 16550A, Port: 0x02f8, IRQ: 3, Flags: spd_vhi
>
>Here is what I've tried so far:
>Changing mtu/mru settings (currently 576)
>Using setserial to set spd_vhi
>Using irqtune to make irq 3 priority 1
>Passing these args to pppd:
> mtu 576
> lcp-max-configure 60
> asyncmap 0
> netmask 255.255.255.0
>...and I tried some other stuff I can't immediately remember.
>
>For all my efforts, the speed is only a touch better than when I began. If you
>have any ideas, I would be grateful for them.
>
>Thanks for your help and patience,
>Dave D
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
pppd /dev/ttyS1 115200 modem crtscts lock
are my options. My downloads are better in linux than in windows even
at a lower connect speed.
26400 in linux turns out 2.9 kilobytes/sec
31200 in windows turns out 2.4 kilobytes/sec
49999 in linux turns out 5.2 kilobytes/sec <---isn't vj-comp nice :-)
49999 in windows turns out 4.3 kilobytes/sec
(speed were mesured by ftp download of a linux kernel 2.2.1)
(raw text screems in at 10-13 kilobytes/sec [yahoo personal page
listing] on both systems though)
I have a zoom int 56k v.90 modem.
my 33.6 I still have will run curcles arount my 56k connected at the
same speed though ie 31200 to 31200
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Browser doesn't see my local Apache server
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 13:00:56 GMT
Yes! Although my loopback interface was configured, it wasn't active. I can
get it to work by running "/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup lo". But I
will have to do this every time I boot the system. My ifcfg-lo file contains
the line ONBOOT=yes, but it doesn't seem to start automatically. Is there
another file somewhere which should have a line starting the loopback
interface?
Thanks
Chris
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I've tried localhost and 127.0.0.1 and with :80, but nothing works. The
> > Netscape 'keyword' thing can be disabled, but I get 'network unavailable'
> > instead.
> >
> > BTW Ping 127.0.0.1 gives the same thing.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> At a prompt, type ifconfig and see what comes up. You should have an
> interface name 'lo' first, with ip 127.0.0.1, then any ethernet cards
> you have will be listed after that. If you don't have lo, than you need
> to put up your loopback interface...I think it's in the kernel (or in a
> module if you've got them). You may have to recompile.
>
> --
> rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
> ---------------
> My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
> represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
> ---
> Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
> beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
> ---
> Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
> rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
>
****************************************
I am also on chris at sunset dot force9
dot co dot uk which I read more often!
****************************************
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPFWADM/ IP Masq. / NIC Problem: Question
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 08:11:48 -0500
I am trying to setup ip masqerade and have two nic cards.
eth0 3com595tx 100.100.100.1 (fake 8=) )
eth1 3com509b 10mb 192.168.1.1
Both are up and can be pinged locally..
The eth0 is outbound to the wan/internet. The other is obviously for the
internal side. The rpoblem is that when users internal try and ping
192.168.1.1 the get time outs. If I try and ping a user 191.168.1.5 I get :
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
PING 192.168.1.5 (192.168.1.5): 56 data bytes
ping: wrote 192.168.1.5 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: wrote 192.168.1.5 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: wrote 192.168.1.5 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: wrote 192.168.1.5 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: wrote 192.168.1.5 64 chars, ret=-1
--- 192.168.1.5 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
I have booted up with only eth1 reconfigured with a valid outbound ip and
the card works fine. Any ideas???
TIA,
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Ethernet Problems
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:43:02 GMT
Paul Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I was expecting a fast result. I have heard great things about
>linux newsgroups.
Please adjust your newsreader to limit the line length to about 72
chars.
>At least when I post to a Microsoft newsgroup I get a timely
>helpfull response.
[...]
Perhaps you told them more details.
Try again with
- the details of your system setup , including HW details
- the output of "cat < /proc/pci" and "cat < /proc/interrupts"
- the output of "dmesg"
- the output of "ifconfig"
- the output of "route -n"
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: funny routing!
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:25:18 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >I have linux setup as PPP router. I am using netscape from a Windows 95
>> >client. I am using apache web server as http proxy. The problem is that I
>> >can browse the web but cannot read mail or news from my ISP!
>>
>> No, offcourse not, mail and news don't use http, so a http proxy won't work.
>> Use IP-Masquerading for smtp and nntp.
>
>I am not sure if I am using IP-Masquerading for smtp and nntp. I will check.
>However, when I added in my windows box, linux machine as Gateway, it worked!
>Does that mean I am using IP-Masquerading?
Yes, probably. Check it with ipfwadm -M -l, this should list the masqueraded
connections.
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Izak Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: netware printers
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 19:40:23 +0200
I have answered this question at least 5 times in the past month :).
Dump lpd and use LPRng instead. You're going to have a real hard time
getting it to run using the bsd lpd. You can also read the article I
wrote for linux gazzette on this issue. (November 1998).
This does not mean that LPRng will solve all your problems, but in my case
it did, even though I didnt have the same symptoms. If you need any
further information you can contact me, I will be delighted to help.
regards
Izak
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
----==-- _
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __
Microsoft is not the answer. --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
Microsoft is the question. -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Linux is the answer: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Note: Mail from yahoo.com and hotmail.com domains will go to a special folder
and my not get read until much later. I'm sorry for this inconvenience but I
get to much spam from people in these domains.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: funny routing!
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:06:03 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Now when I try traceroute on mail or nntp server, I get the following strange
>>message:
>># traceroute 205.231.236.9
>>traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 192.168.100.1 @ eth0
>
>you have 2 hosts on your network using the same ip address.
No, it doesn't. Traceroute simply doesn't know what interface to use. You can
detect duplicate IP's by pinging the suspected IP.
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: how to connect 3 computers?
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:08:08 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Ho wrote:
>However the network is SLOOOW....I dual boot my system with Win98
>(sorry guys..I know it sux...but there are more games ma...Linux still
>rulez!!) And when playing something like Quake2 over the network,
>either computer A or B (when played with only 2 computers) will
>disconnected and then exits the current deathmatch. It happens with
>other games too, not just Quake2.
>And browsing on the net is quite slow too...
Sounds like cable problems to me.
>
>I want to connect it in a ring...(will that helps??)
>
>B ----------- A ---------------C
> \_________________/
>
That's impossible.
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2 killed my SAMBA
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 12:32:01 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look at the Control Pannel RunLevel Editor and see if there in
there.
Put 3 in /etc/inittab. You should see them being started when
you go to init 3.
Sprinkle some echo's in /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb to >>
/homedir/smb_startup and see what
you get out i.e. if its being called and how far.
d
"Jack L. Owens" wrote:
>
> After downloading, compiling, configuring, and installing SAMBA
> 2.0.0, everything was working properly including the printer.
> The Win98 machine was talking to the printer and hard disks on
> the linux machine. The Linux machine was able to mount shares
> on the Win98 machine. I was pleased. Then, I used RedHat 5.2's
> configuration tool. Now I have no SAMBA. "smbd -D" and "nmbd
> -D" appear to install themselves but a "ps aux | grep mbd"
> fails to return anything.
>
> How do I get my SAMBA up and running again?
>
> --
> Jack L. Owens K6PWY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 4421 Myrtle Avenue 1001 Buena Vista #2
> Long Beach, California 90807 San Clemente, California 92672
> (562)989-9413 (949)498-6157
>
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "John Madden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smb AND nt
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:49:01 -0500
Hello,
I have red Hat SMB version 1.9x and windows NT 4.x on the same net. I
can use smbclient to see files on the NT machine, and at times the Linux box
shows up in my browser. Unfortunately, I get
"The remote computer is unavailable"
when I try to connect to the Red Hat machine via \\servername\share through
NT.
Has anyone run into this before? Is there a good listing on smbclient
commands?
Linuxconfig, FTP, telnet, etc all work fine.
Thanks for any info!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux Router/Firewall problem
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 17:35:13 GMT
Thanks for the messages on the routing. I think I have it correct now(A great
article in LJ by Mike Hughes gave me the right routing script as well). But
the problem is still forwarding I think. Here is the new situation. The
router can see the outside world, and one of the machines on the inside(test
machine). The test machine can see, the eth1 address of the router, and the
eth0 address, which is the DSL address of the adaptor. It can also see the
gateway PacBell provided. It can telnet in and ping the router eth0. What it
can't see is anything past that. Like our name server and such. I have an
entry under /proc/net for ip_forward, so I THINK it is working. I have tried
some simple ipfwadm rules to just forward/accept everything, but those don't
work. Also, when I run traceroute, it gets to the eth1 adaptor address, then
just stops on the firewall. Any ideas?
>
> your routing table should look more like
> host/network netmask gateway interface
> 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 lo
> 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 eth0
> xxx.xxx.xxx.0 255.255.255.0 eth1
> default 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.? eth1
>
> This can be achieved by:
> route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo
> route add -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth0
> route add -net xxx.xxx.xxx.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 dev eth1
> route add default gw xxx.xxx.xxx.?
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Luca
> --
> Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Minimum PC spec for IP masquerading???
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 21:38:23 +0800
Any pc will do this simple task,
I have a 386DX 40 with 32 Meg of ram running as a proxy server receiving
10,000 requests an hour..............
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Mike Kirk wrote:
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 14:14:51 -0500
> From: Mike Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
> Subject: Minimum PC spec for IP masquerading???
>
> How fast of a PC would I need to do IP masquerading for 4 other PCs on my
> internal network, out through my cable modem? Would a 386 with 2 ISA
> NE2000 cards be enough? Essentially, it'll just be picking up packets off
> 1 network card, and dropping them on to the other. This doesn't seem to be
> something that would require a P2, but I don't want to lose any
> performance by having to wait on the gateway box.
>
> Any opinions are appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
>
> ===========================================
> Mike Kirk Tel: 416-482-7801
> Halcyon, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> URL: http://www.halcyon.ca
>
>
>
>
Bob PHILLIPS
Partner/System Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ISP to the nor'west of Western Australia
| http://www.norcom.net.au
Yes, I am on the interthingy | If it aint broke, fix it, then it will be
==========================================================================
Pilbara Systems PO Box 2762 SOUTH HEDLAND WA 6722 AUSTRALIA
==========================================================================
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with IP Routing Problem!
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 08:38:10 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael,
Confused by:
> I have recently got another IP address for my local network,
> so that I can host both a primary and secondary DNS server. I would
> like to just change the IP of my second Linux box so it can be the
> secondary
> DNS server...
How are you connected to the network? Do you still have one
connection or got a second with the new address? When you say
"host" are you running DNS and doing lookups or have nameserver
addresses supplied by your ISP?
Michael23 wrote:
>
> IP routing problem:
> Hello, I have a dual-homed Linux host serving as a firewall and gateway
> for a LAN of Linux and Win95 machines. The entire LAN is masqueraded
> behind the linux box and can access the internet with no problem.
>
> I have recently got another IP address for my local network,
> so that I can host both a primary and secondary DNS server. I would
> like to just change the IP of my second Linux box so it can be the
> secondary
> DNS server...
>
> So far I have tried everything I can think of and still it is not
> working.
>
> First, I removed the masquerading for Linux machine2.
> Second, I reconfigured Linux machine2's NIC using ifconfig.
> Then I set up Linux machine2's route table to have the LAN NIC on
> the dual-homed linux machine1 as its default gateway.
> Finally, I added a route to Linux machine2 in the dual-homed linux
> machine1's table.
>
> So far it doesn't work. I can ping the LAN NIC(192.168.1.1) card from
> linux machine2,
> and I can ping linux machine2 from dual-homed linux machine1...
> But, I can't ping the other NIC card(208.123.164.169) or reach the
> outside
> world from linux machine2
>
> Could you please have a look at the info below and tell me what is
> wrong...
> I would sure appreciate it... It's been three nights in a row staring at
> this brick wall.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael23
>
> (note real world IP's have been changed to protect the innocent)
>
> Here is my current setup:
>
> Internet
> |
> DSL
> |
> NIC1 = 208.123.164.169
> dual-homed linux machine1
> NIC2 = 192.168.1.1
> |
> |
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> |
> | |
> NIC = 192.168.1.2 NIC =
> 192.168.1.3 NIC = 192.168.1.4
> win95 machine1 win95
> machine2 Linux machine2
>
> This is the setup I want:
> Internet
> |
> DSL
> |
> NIC1 = 208.123.164.169
> dual-homed linux machine1
> NIC2 = 192.168.1.1
> |
> |
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> |
> | |
> NIC = 192.168.1.2 NIC =
> 192.168.1.3 NIC = 208.123.164.170 <--
> notice real world IP
> win95 machine1 win95
> machine2 Linux machine2
>
> The info below reflects my current attempt.
> Here is the routing table, ifconfig output, and ipfwadm -F list for the
> dual-homed machine1:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway
> Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 208.123.164.169 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
> UH 0 0 0 eth0
> 208.123.164.0 0.0.0.0
> 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 595 eth0
> 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
> UH 0 0 0 eth1
> 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
> UH 0 0 510 eth1
> 192.168.1.3 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
> UH 0 0 20 eth1
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0
> 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth1
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
> 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 12 lo
> 0.0.0.0 208.123.164.174
> 0.0.0.0 UG 1 0 4680 eth0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:23:F8:34
> inet addr:208.123.164.169 Bcast:208.123.164.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1393619 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:9 frame:8
> TX packets:889612 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:58
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:A9:0C:F2:CE
> inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:906043 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:119
> TX packets:970123 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:2
> collisions:63
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
>
> IP firewall forward rules, default policy: deny
> type prot source destination ports
> acc/m all 192.168.1.2 0.0.0.0/0 n/a
> acc/m all 192.168.1.3 0.0.0.0/0 n/a
>
> Here is the routing table and ifconfig output for the new linux
> machine2:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags
> Metric Ref Use Iface
> 208.123.164.170 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0
> 0 2 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
> U 0 0 12 lo
> 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 0.0.0.0
> UG 1 0 4680 eth0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:23:F8:34
> inet addr:208.123.164.170 Bcast:208.123.164.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1393619 errors:8 dropped:0 overruns:9 frame:8
> TX packets:889612 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:58
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:689 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ^^^ Strange Sendmail Problem ^^^
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 12:51:35 +0100
This is not strange but normal.
To change your outgoing domain read:
/usr/doc/packages/sendmail/FAQ.part1.sendmail => Q3.1
set these m4 macros:
MASQUERADE_AS(my.dom.ain)
FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)
In SuSE 6.0 you just set FROM_HEADER=my.dom.ain
leo
Alvin wrote in message <7blleb$m0m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I've been trying to setup sendmail for local and internet mailing. I have a
>dialup account with an ISP.
>
>So far, I've managed to get internal mails working and sending out internet
>mails to my ISP for re-routing.
>
>My problem is the receiver of my internet mail can't reply to me as the
>reply address is my Linux Server.
>
>How do I configure sendmail such that mails going out to the Internet have
>reply headers of my internet account??
>
>Thanks in advance for your help.
>
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
