Linux-Networking Digest #408, Volume #10 Sun, 7 Mar 99 01:13:49 EST
Contents:
Re: NT4/Samba - Lost connectivity (Ken Braatz)
Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT ("TURBO1010")
Re: modem unavailable after reset button pressed (Chris Beamis)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Lew Pitcher)
Re: pppd ccp negotiation problems (Clifford Kite)
HELP : Sendmail flushing queue setup ("Paul Groth")
Re: Ftp problem, root cannot login across telnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: modem suggestions? (William Cornett)
Re: modem suggestions? ("doug")
routeing over PPP (Griffin Caprio)
One-way Cable Modem (Pavel Greenfield)
Re: how to connect 3 computers? (James Ho)
Re: Ping yes, telnet no, HELP!!! (Wade Olsen)
Re: PPP problems (John Hickmott)
YOU WONT BELEIVE THIS BUT ITS TRUE!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Ken Braatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NT4/Samba - Lost connectivity
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 04:24:44 +0000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------------------------------
From: "TURBO1010" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 20:23:11 -0800
I got the same problem, I made the file smbpasswd, what should be in
smbusers to enable encryption? I can log in with plain text, but not with
encrypted passwords.
David Kirkpatrick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Well what does smbusers look like?
>
>Ronald Hovens wrote:
>>
>> David,
>>
>> My smbpassword file is setup, but I cannot connect!
>>
>> David Kirkpatrick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >Ronald,
>> > Your smbpasswd may not be setup. Look at the man for
>> >smbpasswd its simple. Also look at /etc/smbusers.
>> > The encryption is OK set at yes.
>> >After you execute smbpasswd you shoud have something like the
>> >following in your /etc/smbpasswd.
>> >
>> ># Samba SMB password file
>>
>root:0:7E638C38F146E9A6AAD3B435B51404EE:611B779573C5481E8091149DFC6A68EC:ro
>> ot:/root:/bin/bash
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Ronald Hovens wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am running a Linux samba server (1.9.18p10) and I want to connect to
it
>> >> with a Laptop that runs on Win98.
>> >>
>> >> TCP networking is running fine: I can telnet and ping from one to
>> another.
>> >> Furthermore, I can see the shared devices on the laptop when I run
>> >> smbclient -L hostnameoflaptop> on my linux samba server.
>> >>
>> >> My problem is that I cannot connect to (the shared devices on) my
samba
>> >> server: everytime I enter data in the win98 logon dialog, I get the
>> message
>> >> "the domain password you supplied is not correct, or access to logon
>> server
>> >> has been denied".
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> On my laptop I have set:
>> >>
>> >> primary logon: Client for micorsoft network
>> >> workgroup in Identification: MYGROUP
>> >> properties for Client for microsoft networks: Log on to windows NT
domain
>> >> MYGROUP
>> >> wins enabled for the network connection (wins adress is the linux
samba
>> >> server IP adress)
>> >> ------------------------
>> >> Some relevant(?) settings on my samba server (in /etc/smb.conf):
>> >>
>> >> workgroup = MYGROUP
>> >> encrypt passwords = yes (I have read that win98 sends encrypted
>> passwords)
>> >> smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
>> >> os level = 34
>> >> domain master = yes
>> >> preferred master = yes
>> >> domain logons = yes
>> >> wins support = yes
>> >>
>> >> I assume that something is wrong with password encryption. What can I
do?
>> >> Please help.
>> >> R. Hovens
>> >
>> >--
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>--
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
From: Chris Beamis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem unavailable after reset button pressed
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 00:18:30 GMT
William R. Mattil wrote:
>
> Chris Beamis wrote:
>
> > > Does cu -d /dev/cua[0-4] (use the appropriate device number :^) ) work ?
> > > ie: can you send commands to the modem ??? +++ATZ and get an "OK" response back
> > > ??
> > > If this does not work (device busy) you probably have an errant lock file hanging
> > > around.
> > >
> > > Hope this helps
> > >
> > > Bill
> >
> > Thanks, I will try this forthwith. However, I suspect that I will get
> > the device busy message. Like I said in my first posting, I used find
> > to search the whole directory tree for "LCK*" and found nothing. Is
> > there any other names used for modem lock files?
> > Chris Beamis
> >
>
> Well Chris,
>
> On a (more or less :^) ) correctly functioning Firewall providing dial-up support for
> 4 different discrete networks I have the following:
>
> /var/lock/LCK..ttyS1
>
> But I might caution you to take a look at the mgetty documentation. Even if you never
> use it to dial in, there is a very good and rational explanation of lock files.
>
> Hope this helps
>
> Regards
> Bill
Thanks again, but again no joy. I tried
> cu -d /dev/cua1
and got
> cu: /dev/cua1: System not found
I tried
> cu -d -p /dev/cua1 7417777
and got
> cu: No matching ports
I also tried several other variations and flags on cu but couldn't get
anywhere. In the search for lock files, I have previously tried
> find / -iname "LCK*" -print
and it returns nothing, indicating to me that there are no lock files on
my system. I found someone locally who does linux consulting and he
suggested that I check the jumper interrupt setting on both my modem and
my soundcard. He said that because I told him that in my linux bootup
messages there is something about a conflict on IRQ3 involving the
soundblaster card. I also found a second serial address in my BIOS
which he said I should disable. Cooincidently, ever since I went from
RedHat 5.1 to 5.2 the soundblaster quit working. But the modem was
working fine until the reset incident. So I guess I will attack the
machine with a screwdriver tonight.
Thanks again for your help and please feel free to post any more bright
ideas. :)
Chris
------------------------------
From: Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 23:44:59 -0500
KA wrote:
>
> One client used "PC"+last six digits of the IP address. e.g. I has
> PC034083 and PC034134. ABSOLUTELY TERRIBLE! We could never find each
> other's machines.
>
> At home I use names from the short-lived but terribly fun FRPG
> DarkUrthe. (Therrindur, Maldor, Nyrene, Avoncourt, Thrangmar, Ammora)
At work, we have a variety of naming conventions. Typically, tho, it
boils down to a three-character dept id, followed by a three-character
group id, followed by a two digit user number.
In this vein, we have SRDSCS00, SRDOLB14, etc.
At home, I name my machines with personal names that sound appropriate
to the machine's primary usage.
"Merlin" is my server; it knows all, and is kept in a dark, dank dungeon
like Merlin was kept by Nimue. "Bitsie" is my workstation; it's cute,
friendly, and sometimes acts like a little child.
--
Lew Pitcher | If everyone has an angle, why
JOAT-in-training | are most of them so obtuse?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: pppd ccp negotiation problems
Date: 5 Mar 1999 17:29:57 -0600
Michael J Surette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: When I dial up my ISP, everything seems to go fine until I get to the
: CCP phase of negotiation. Here is a copy of my debug output. Any ideas
: as to why this is disconnecting me and how to fix it?
There's no indication in this log that the ISP disconnects, but that's
not to say that it isn't doing so or that you don't have some problem
accessing the internet. There are some remarks below that *might* help.
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
: 0x0> <magic 0xad098cca> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1514>
: <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x1bdd100> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05
: ea> < 13 03 00>]
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05
: ea> < 13 03 00>]
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap
: 0x0> <magic 0xad098cca> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1514>
: <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x1bdd100> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1514>
: <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap> <magic 0x1bdd100> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: Mar 5 11:07:12 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
: user="rossv" password="password"]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
: 207.236.51.100> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <compress
: VJ 0f 00> <addr 206.47.98.9>]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <compress
: VJ 0f 00> <addr 206.47.98.9>]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
: 207.236.51.174> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
: 207.236.51.174> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
: Mar 5 11:07:13 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
: 207.236.51.174> <compress VJ 0f 00>]
: Mar 5 11:07:23 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x4 < 12 06 00
: 00 00 01> < 11 05 00 00 03> < 11 06 00 00 01 01>]
: Mar 5 11:07:23 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Mar 5 11:07:23 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x4 < 12 06 00
: 00 00 01> < 11 05 00 00 03> < 11 06 00 00 01 01>]
: Mar 5 11:07:23 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x1 < 12 06 00
: 00 00 01>]
This is unusual in that the ISP sends an "unsolicited Nak", in response
to the pppd CCP request with no options. This appears to be a hint for
pppd to request that the ISP send data using Microsoft Point-to-Point
Compression aka MS-PPC. Just before this pppd rejected sending data to
the ISP using MS-PPC and two flavors of STAC compression.
: Mar 5 11:07:26 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Mar 5 11:07:26 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [CCP TermAck id=0x5]
: Mar 5 11:07:26 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [CCP TermReq id=0x2"No
: compression negotiated"]
: Mar 5 11:07:26 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [CCP TermAck id=0x2]
Ordinarily failure to negotiate any common CCP options is not a problem,
but there's nothing else unusual in the negotiations.
It's possible that the ISP is configured to require the use of MS-PPC
when sending to the client. If this is the case then you're out of luck
unless you can convince the ISP not to require it. Even getting to talk
to someone at the ISP that understands the question will be a pain.
I'd consider looking for another ISP - unless something else could be
identified as the cause of the problem.
: Mar 5 11:07:54 sunshine pppd[343]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "User
: request"]
: Mar 5 11:07:54 sunshine pppd[343]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x2]
Here you told pppd to terminate the connection and it does.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* 97.3% of all statistics are made up. */
------------------------------
From: "Paul Groth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP : Sendmail flushing queue setup
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 14:58:12 +1000
Hi All,
I've been trying to setup a little dialup offline mail server, I'm using
fetchmail and sendmail together.
I've setup a dial up script to connect to my isp, it then runs "sendmail -q"
to flush my mail, at this point it promptly forks off into the background
and starts sending mail. Whilst this is happening fetchmail grabs all my
mail off another server. The script will then disconnect me from my isp.
My problem is that even if sendmail is still sending mail, once fetchmail
has finished retrieving mail, the next step in my script is to disconnect
from the ISP. As a result I can't be guaranteed to have all my mail sent.
What can I do to ensure that I won't be disconnected from my ISP until all
my mail is sent. Is there a way to make sendmail send mail in the
foreground, ie it won't start fetchmail until the sendmail -q has finished?
Thanks
Paul
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ftp problem, root cannot login across telnet
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 02:38:32 GMT
Hi,
> Aren't they just as easily sniffed when you su?
Y'know, you're right actually. I mis-spoke.
The real point of /etc/securetty is that you can make sure root can only
log on from the console, which make sniffers not really an issue.
I didn't put sufficient thought into my answer. I guess it's not really
an
issue for me since none of my boxes have telnet or ftp, I only use ssh.
;)
-- Bill
Rick Onanian wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > No matter how secure you think you are you should get into the
> > habit of not telnet'ing and ftp'ing as root. You should do it as
> > a normal use and then su to root. Root passwords are too easily
> > sniffed as they're sent plain text.
>
> Aren't they just as easily sniffed when you su?
>
> Just wondering...
>
> --
> rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
> ---------------
> My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
> represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
> ---
> Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
> beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
> ---
> Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
> rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Cornett)
Subject: Re: modem suggestions?
Date: 7 Mar 1999 04:42:31 GMT
On Sat, 06 Mar 1999 15:41:43 -0600, Brian Huffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Ted wrote:
: >
: > I am most likely going to be purchasing a new modem, because I currently
: > have a winmodem. Does anybody have any suggestions of modems that are good
: > and easy to install on linux. (cheap too). I am running redhat 5.2
: >
: > I've read that I should go with an external... any thoughts?
: >
: > If you could, please reply to my e-mail address, as well as the newsgroup.
: >
:
: I use a Viking 56k External, works great with my ISP and Linux
: recognizes it
Any external modem will work or an internal modem that is configurable
with jumper pins, such as USR or Acer ITU ISA modems.
--
Remove the period from my email address to reply.
------------------------------
From: "doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem suggestions?
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:53:17 -0800
As you already know, Linux can be pretty picky about the hardware that
you use unless you have the time and inclination to write your own scripts.
I did, however, find a very inexpensive modem that works great with Linux --
Thunderlink fax/data -- you can get a 33.6 for less than twenty bucks, and a
56K for about $35. For a "no-name" brand, it works great. Good luck.
------------------------------
From: Griffin Caprio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: routeing over PPP
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 20:44:57 -0600
Ok. I have two computers. Both run Linux. One is my main machine,
other is a extra machine. What I am trying to do is dial into my ISP
from my main box, but be able to use the internet through my extra box.
They are networked, and I can ping, telnet, etc to and from each of
them. But I can't go from my extra box to the Internet. Any help?
Griffin Caprio
------------------------------
From: Pavel Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: One-way Cable Modem
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 21:45:18 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I've got the one-way Cable Modem account from RCN. Has anyone been
successful in getting it two work with linux?
(One way cable modems shouldn't be any different from Linux's point of
view, should they?)
Thanks a lot in advance!
Pavel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Ho)
Subject: Re: how to connect 3 computers?
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 02:53:47 GMT
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 14:08:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
wrote:
>James Ho wrote:
>
>>However the network is SLOOOW....I dual boot my system with Win98
>>(sorry guys..I know it sux...but there are more games ma...Linux still
>>rulez!!) And when playing something like Quake2 over the network,
>>either computer A or B (when played with only 2 computers) will
>>disconnected and then exits the current deathmatch. It happens with
>>other games too, not just Quake2.
>
>>And browsing on the net is quite slow too...
>Sounds like cable problems to me.
cable problem? How can I test the cables? I have 3 cables...so I
just connect them and test each cable by using "ping" to get the
access time, etc?
Also, what do u mean by cable problem? too long cable? or faulty
cable itself?
james.
------------------------------
From: Wade Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ping yes, telnet no, HELP!!!
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 21:35:12 -0800
>
> >> > My routing table looks like:
> >> >
> >> > 255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 U 0 0 0
> >> > eth0
> >> > 292.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0
>
> Is this 292.168.2.0 above a typo or don't you have a host route ?
>
> leo
Sorry, yes that is a typo and should read 192.168.2.0 . My routing table
should look like:
255.255.255.255 * 255.255.255.255 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
1 lo
My linux host name/address as seen in /etc/hosts is:
192.168.2.1 gate.slackatude.com gate
The W98 machine is:
192.168.2.12 snort.slackatude.com snort
Any routing problems here?
------------------------------
From: John Hickmott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: PPP problems
Date: 06 Mar 1999 21:45:06 PST
I had similar experience until I was tipped to 'setserial' ...
I use 'setserial /dev/cua2 auto_irq autoconfig'
It may be worth investigating... it has a man page.
John Hickmott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Satellite Owner wrote:
> Omar Sattari:
>
> yeah, i have slackware.
>
> a communications program like seyon has no problem dialing out, but my
> ppp
> doesn't
>
> here's what i think:
>
> i have my slackware on an old 486 with windows 3.1.
>
> when i used the windows internet, i HAD to change the irq to 4, even
> though
>
> terminal(comm. program) worked fine.
>
> i think our problem is that ppp assumes an irq of 3 on com1, just like
> WINDOWS,
>
> does anybody know how to change an irq in LINUX???
>
> in my dialup, the init string gets sent to the modem, but no OK is
> given back!!!
>
> i think this is the problem!!!
>
> just in case, my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rick Glunt wrote:
>
> > I am having simmilar problems with RH5.2, however when I activate my
> ppp
> > interface, my modem never dials out. I know my modem is setup b/c I
> can use
> > it doing amannual dial out.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.digest,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion,mailing.unix.samba
Subject: YOU WONT BELEIVE THIS BUT ITS TRUE!!!
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 05:40:50 GMT
Dear Reader ,
If you are looking for free passwords of adult pay sites like
ADULTCHECK.COM,
SEXMUSEUM.COM , PENTHOUSELIVE.COM etc etc , then you should visit our newly
created illegal webpage at :
http://fly.to/freepass
We also have "GAY SITES ILLEGAL HACKED PASSWORDS LIST"
If you have any question , Dont hesitate to email me at :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
