Linux-Networking Digest #408, Volume #12 Mon, 30 Aug 99 02:13:43 EDT
Contents:
Re: A word of thanks ("William B. Cattell")
Re: Firewall Question ("Bill Somerville")
Re: telnet from Windows to Red Hat Linux does not work (Christopher Allen)
TIS vs. Socks5 firewall? (bewale)
Re: telnet from Windows to Red Hat Linux does not work (David Efflandt)
Re: smtp and pop (Christopher Allen)
Please help!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Running an smb client (haze)
Re: new linux box added to network can't access internet (Christopher Allen)
Rlogin via eXceed ("Len Garvey")
I don't know the first thing regarding PPP dial-up (mike gore)
Re: compaq netelligent with BNC ("Tony Platt")
ip masq. - problem w/ ipfwadm (Richard James Panturis Giuly)
Re: Help ! IP Forwarding only works one way :( (Udate) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: corrupted IP addresses problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DETERMINING IP INFO FAILED AT BOOT HELP! DHCP !!!! ("Stew Rappaport")
Re: DHCP, SMTP, and Linux problems... (Jason Etheridge)
How can I get connectivity to Battle.Net (for StarCraft) through my ipchains
firewall? (Jim Elliott)
Re: NetWork Newbie (s)
Re: NFS and GNU Linker producing corrupted executables (RHL (Jennie Haywood)
Re: Network card - newbie (s)
Re: NFS and GNU Linker producing corrupted executables (RHL 2.2.5-15/2.2.11 and AIX
4.2.1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux Netzwerk Programmierung ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Samba PFD ("Tom")
Ping Problem?? (Vincent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "William B. Cattell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A word of thanks
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 02:24:44 GMT
"Doug R." wrote:
>
> Just like to say thank-you to the regulars in this newsgroup that take
> the time to answer questions.
>
> I live in a remote area of northern Canada, where bookstores and
> computer stores (with Linux knowledge) are things I only hear about.
>
> In the past three months I have built a Linux server (runnng RedHat6)
> out of parts I've begged or found at the dump :-) and, by reading the
> man docs and lurking here in this newsgroup, I've figured out how to
> create a home network. I've been working with dos/win stand-alone
> machines for nearly 20 years, but this was my first attempt at
> networking. Now I have three machines up and running beautifully (NT
> wrkstn -- LInux server -- Win95 stn.)
>
> To the Linux experts: your answers and tips are worth more than all the
> books ever published; please tolerate us amateurs and keep the advice
> flowing.
>
> To the newbies (like me): Read! I've found the answer to the majority of
> my questions by simply reviewing previous posts. Why wait for an answer
> when it's already there?
>
> --
> Thanks from the north,
> Doug
Doug - I'm not sure *how* remote you are but here's an
online computer book club I use alot... FWIW.
http://scbc.booksonline.com/cgi-bin/ndCGI.exe/Develop/pagHome?clubId=SCBC
Lot's o' Linux books (amongst others)
Bill
--
==============================================================
http://members.home.com/wcattell
==============================================================
Park not thy Harley in the darkness of thine garage, that it
may collect dust for want of being oft ridden. Ride thy
Harley
with thy brethren, and rejoice in the spirit of the road.
==============================================================
------------------------------
From: "Bill Somerville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Firewall Question
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:06:42 GMT
RedHat 5.2 includes ip masquerading (NAT) and firewall. Take a look at
http://www.linux.org in the HowTo/mini-HowTo sections for information. The
ipfwadm program is your control, but the man pages are fairly worthless.
If you also need VPN (PPTP) support, there is another mini-HowTo for that.
You'll have to patch/recompile your kernel. Ugh.
-- Bill
Gary Lindgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:37c9d482$0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What are the firewall applications out there for Linux. I have Red Hat 5.2
> distribution, is there a firewall included. The application is for use
with
> a DSL connection. Any recomendations much appreciated.
> Gary Lindgren
>
>
------------------------------
From: Christopher Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnet from Windows to Red Hat Linux does not work
Date: 30 Aug 1999 03:07:58 GMT
BM Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> PC to the Linux machine failed. The TELNET window just hangs, apparently
> not getting any connection.
Well, Check /etc/inetd.conf read the top of the file for how to restart
and un-comment out the lines that are your services that you want to have..
i.e telnetd ftpd
Then give it the killall -HUP inetd
and try from your win* box. Also make sure you have the servers to listen
for these requests...
example: in.telnetd
-Good Luck
-later
------------------------------
From: bewale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security
Subject: TIS vs. Socks5 firewall?
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 23:19:40 -0400
Hey guys,
I need a free, proxy firewall that supports the standard proxies...http,
ftp, SSL, POP3.. plus allows URL screening, authentication, and
firewall to firewall encryption (VPN).
TIS (freeware version) will only has a http and ftp proxy. Everything
else (above) is only available on the commercial version.
So my question is: How does Socks5 compare? Can it do all the above?
for free?
Thanks,
Brian
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Efflandt)
Subject: Re: telnet from Windows to Red Hat Linux does not work
Date: 30 Aug 1999 03:42:31 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:18:23 +0200, BM Lam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>after installing Red Hat Linux 5.2 on my PC connected to a LAN, I was
>quite disappointed to find out that telnetting from a Win 95 or Win NT
>PC to the Linux machine failed. The TELNET window just hangs, apparently
>not getting any connection.
It will hang for a minute or two if you do not have names for machines
connecting to it in /etc/hosts or DNS. Linux is paranoid and does a
reverse lookup of any connecting machine. It has to go through DNS
timeout if there is no name for the remote.
>Ping from the Windows PC to Linux DOES work.
>
>FTP from the Windows PC to Linux failed as well, but at least I got the
>message "connection closed by remote host" immediately.
>
>Is there something that I need to fix in the Linux sys files?
Just make sure you have in.telnetd and in.ftpd installed and enabled in
/etc/inetd.conf
--
David Efflandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xnet.com/~efflandt/
http://www.de-srv.com/ http://cgi-help.virtualave.net/
------------------------------
From: Christopher Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: smtp and pop
Date: 30 Aug 1999 03:15:59 GMT
Holger Bunkradt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Hello,
> I will use Linux as smtp and pop server for my win clients.
Greetings:
Good Idea!
Look at "qmail" for smtp, and "qpopper" for pop3.
You can find these at http://www.freshmeat.net
-Tag
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Please help!!
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 02:47:06 GMT
Hello - I have a laptop that I would like to use as some type of
Firewall. I am running Mandrake 6.0 and I have two NIC cards installed.
Q1: What file do I need to modify so that when I reboot the NIC's dont
lose their IP info.
Q2: How do I set the NIC's to use a specific IRQ and IO?
Q3: Which program do I need to run in order to get packets from one side
of the network to the other?
Q4: Should IPv4 be set to true in when using two nics and I have the
need to get packets to the other network?
Thanks so much - Gammo
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: haze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Running an smb client
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:44:55 GMT
look for Tksmb very nice interface makes life easier
HAZE
root wrote:
> Anyone know how to run an smb client on Linux?� I am trying a frontend
> called LinNeighborhood which emulates the windows Network Neighborhood
> feature.
> Running it while connected to the network shows just one computer on the
> list:� mine.� Is there a tutorial somebody could point me toward?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Christopher Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: new linux box added to network can't access internet
Date: 30 Aug 1999 03:13:27 GMT
Christopher J. Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Patrick Finnegan wrote:
>>
>> "Christopher J. Vogt" wrote:
>>
> default gateway 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0
Unless things have radically changed in the file structure of RH6, you can
change the gateway of your linux box by editing /etc/sysconfig/network
The gateway is the ip of the machine that you are using to get out to the net.
In this case I think youmentioned it was the NT machine? If so your gateway for the
linux box would be the NTs IP...
------------------------------
From: "Len Garvey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Rlogin via eXceed
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:21:27 -0500
I recently upgraded from RH5.2 to RH6.0. I'm running eXceed from an NT
Server, since upgrading to RH6.0 I have had problems connecting via eXceed's
xstart it seems that rlogin is not supported -- Telnet works however. Has
anyone experienced this anomoly? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: mike gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: I don't know the first thing regarding PPP dial-up
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:31:05 GMT
I just installed Red Hat Linux 6.0 yesterday, and I'm poking around
xwindows trying to figure it out.
I finally got the modem "mounted" or whatever and now I need the easiest
possible answer to being able to dial up my ISP and use the internet.
I'm sick of rebooting to use my Winchode98 internet connection to find
linux answers.
Any Help will be appreciated.
Mike Gore
================== Posted via CNET Linux Help ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Tony Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: compaq netelligent with BNC
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 19:53:28 +1000
emeurant wrote in message ...
>I have a compaq deskpro 4000 (5166)with mandrake6 and the netelligent is
>recognised during setup. But impossible to ping anybody else than the
>localhost adress. I'm using BNC as a media, is it possible that the
>problem is due to the fact I use BNC instead of UTP?
what do you mean by localhost address????
if you mean 127.0.0.1 then you can't do that
give each machine an IP address of say
192.168.0.2 <<machine one
192.168.0.3 <<machine two
both with a netmask of 255.255.255.0
then try pinging the machines at 192.168.0.2 or 3 and see what happens
localhost is just what it says, LOCAL to that machine only
Tony
>Is there some workaround in this case ?
>
>Thanks to all
>
>------------------ Posted via CNET Linux Help ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
Subject: ip masq. - problem w/ ipfwadm
From: Richard James Panturis Giuly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 30 Aug 1999 00:18:48 -0400
i am setting up ip masquerading (obviously)
hopefully all the kernel options are set
i believe the modules are loaded
but
i type this:
ipfwadm -F -p deny
and get this:
ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument
any help is appreciated
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help ! IP Forwarding only works one way :( (Udate)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:30:40 GMT
On 30 Aug 1999 00:24:27 GMT, Darks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--snip--
>i just tested it the other way around and now the short summary:
>
>forwarding eth1 ---> eth0 works as expected
> eth0 ---> eth1 doesn�t work at all :(
>
--snip--
Did you configure the gateway addresses of each network to be the
corresponding IP addresses of the router box?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: corrupted IP addresses problem
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:04:39 GMT
If it helps, I also tried an ISA 3com NIC, running at 10mbps, with
exactly the same results. I was suspecting my PCI bus, but now I am
suspecting the Linux networking software.
john
In article <7qa82t$77v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello, I hope someone can help me with my network problem.
>
> I am trying to set up a simple two node network with a hub in
> between, one machine running Linux and the other Win95.
>
> What is happening is simple pinging results in horrendous turnaround
> times with 70+% packet loss. Pinging from either machine gives the
same
> results.
>
> I have tried two different Linuxes (Red Hats 5.2 and 6.0), two
> different ethernet cards (Netgear tulip-based and noname realtek 8139,
> both PCI), two different hubs, two different speeds (10 and 100mbs),
and
> swapped out CAT5 cabling. I am beginning to think there is something
> wrong with my Linux box hardware.
>
> I put a sniffer on the ethernet device and discovered why I am getting
> such poor results: somehow the IP addresses are getting munged. I am
> dealing with addresses 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.100, but the sniffer
> will occassionally report: "From: 89.10.192.168 To: 1.100.0.0 protocol
> 160 not recognized." See how the address has been shifted? After
awhile,
> every network request results in the address getting screwed up and
only
> a reboot will rectify it. But then after a few good addresses, they
> start getting corrupted again.
>
> Does anyone have any idea what is going on here?
>
> Thanks a bunch for any clues.
>
> john stump
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Stew Rappaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DETERMINING IP INFO FAILED AT BOOT HELP! DHCP !!!!
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 23:55:59 -0500
Make sure that:
You are resetting your cable modem if you are switching it to be directly
connected to another machine. For instance I unplug the cable-modem patch
cable coming out of a Windoze98 box and plug it directly into my Linux box
on occasion.
You are using the newest version of Pump from Redhat (version 0.7.0 I
think).
Stew
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Etheridge)
Subject: Re: DHCP, SMTP, and Linux problems...
Date: 30 Aug 1999 04:03:40 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Cowles wrote:
>1) Change the MTU of your outbound connection to the internet.
This sounds like a good idea. The things that _have_ been working
are mostly inbound. I didn't catch on to that.
># "Smart" relay host (may be null)
>DSmail.yourisp.com
At first, we were having the clients connect directly to various ISP
smtp servers in the first place. Then we tried putting one on a
localhost and having it relay to a smarthost. Looking at the logs,
smail would "receive" the e-mail, but we would never get a "delivered"
and "completed" unless PPP was running instead of ADSL.
Another problem has arisen, in that some websites timeout if using
the ADSL instead of PPP. This behavior is less consistent, however,
and I suspect that it is because of random addresses (say, getting
a f10.mail.yahoo.com instead of a f1.mail.yahoo.com).
So maybe it is the MTU thing, or maybe packets to certain IP numbers
are getting mangled somehow, and all the SMTP servers we have access
to unluckily fit whatever criterea is being applied. This stuff is
all voodoo to me, though. Thanks for your help.
--
PHASEFX @ ALTAVISTA.NET - http://www.mindspring.com/~phasefx
------------------------------
From: Jim Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How can I get connectivity to Battle.Net (for StarCraft) through my ipchains
firewall?
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 03:46:27 GMT
I've set up a firewall for my home network using ipchains and
masquerading under RedHat 6. Most things work great, but I'm hitting my
head against a brick wall trying to get StarCraft to work through it.
The "MASQ Applications" site is geared toward older ipfwadm-based
firewalls, and I can't seem to quite translate that to ipchains.
After some investigation, I downloaded and installed ipmasqadm, which
in theory provides the functionality expected by the solution, and
added these lines to my firewall setup:
# Allow Battle.Net TCP and UDP packets in
ipmasqadm autofw -A -r tcp 6112 6112 -h 172.20.17.1
ipmasqadm autofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -h 172.20.17.1
[and, earlier, in my output filter rules:]
# Allow Battle.Net packets in.
ipchains -A output -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d $intnet 6112 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -A output -p udp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d $intnet 6112 -j ACCEPT
172.20.17.1 is the private address of the machine on which I want to
play StarCraft.
My traffic is still getting blocked, thus:
Aug 29 21:24:08 jukebox kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth1 PROTO=17
216.32.73.174:6112 172.20.17.1:6112 L=36 S=0x00 I=16116 F=0x0000 T=114
I find it curious that it seems to be trying to send this packet out
the external interface (eth1, connected to the cable modem) rather than
the internal interface (eth0, the LAN). And I'm not sure what rules to
add to make it work.
Has anyone successfully set up a relatively tight firewall that still
allows UDP traffic to/from Battle.Net? If so, can you share you rules
and/or otherwise help me out?
Thanks!
--
To reply, remove the "spamfree" portion of my domain name.
------------------------------
From: s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NetWork Newbie
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:25:19 GMT
the are HOT file and different site you should go there frist
try runing setup from the command promt and the should be a way from
there to
set it up there is sould be a better and easer way if you are running
X-windows
or startx wich starts the redhat linux windows :) good luck i hope this
helps
Tim wrote:
>
> I am a newbie when it comes to networking in linux. I am having some
> trouble just locating the tool that I can use to canfigure my network.
> I have RedHat 6 and want to configure my system for my ADSL connection
> with a dynamic IP. Thanks.
------------------------------
From: Jennie Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.development.kernel,comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: NFS and GNU Linker producing corrupted executables (RHL
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 23:49:08 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This particular APAR has nothing to do with file locking. It has more to do
with the VMM.
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> David Elder wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> first thing to check would be that the lock demon is running (and working
> to specs :-( I have seen this on other system combinations and lockd was
> usually involved.
>
> Martin
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Knoblauch
> Compaq Computer EMEA BV
> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Std.Disclaimer: Not speaking for COMPAQ in any form on this medium
------------------------------
From: s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network card - newbie
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:34:16 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
let me know if this helps you
k find out if your card is ne200 compatibel read the spec or the box it
came in
there sould be a "DOS" not windowds utilty to setup your card or at
least read the I/O and IRQ the in linux chose ne200 as your card and use
the infoe you get
from the DOS utily it may be called diag one of the flopys that came
with the card good luck
Paul Fredlein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just bought Ret Hat 6 & a D-Link DFE-530TX 10/100 PCI Adapter.
>
> The problem, as you have guessed, is that the card is not listed. What
> do I do? I've downloaded a .c file for the card but don't know what to
> do with it.
>
> Windoze tell me that it's io is 0xb800 but all the books suggest it
> should be on 0x300 or 0x310.
>
> I suppose I have to re-compile the kernel but don't know where to start.
> Most of the books tell you all about somebody's wonderful windowing
> thing and not what you really need to know. Bill Ball's "Using Linux"
> seems OK but nothing about my basic problem.
>
> Eventually I want to run the Linux box as a file server for my NT box
> and my Mac. Is AppleTalk automatically included? (if I ever get it to
> see my card).
>
> BTW, why does Linux list hundreds of monitors when important stuff like
> network cards only get a couple listed and then not much documentation
> on what to do if your card's not there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.development,comp.os.linux.development.kernel
Subject: Re: NFS and GNU Linker producing corrupted executables (RHL 2.2.5-15/2.2.11
and AIX 4.2.1)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 05:00:23 GMT
NFS WRITE ALLOWING HOLES IN FILE
bos.net.nfs.client 4.2.1.11 IX75138 U453582
bos.net.nfs.client 4.3.0.5 IX75226 U453951
bos.net.nfs.client 4.3.1.0 IX75226 U455608
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I hope someone has a simple solution to my problem:
>
> Hardware: DELL Optiplex GX1, 256Mb RAM, running RH Linux 6.0
> using both the stock 2.2.5-15 kernel and the
> latest 2.2.11 kernel.
>
> IBM RS6000 3AT running AIX 4.2.1
>
> 1) RS6000 serves an NFS file system to the Linux box.
> NFS file system contains Fortran source code for a
> modelling program.
>
> 2) Compile the source code in 4 scenarios - on the linux box
> using the PGI fortran 90 compiler and ECGS for one .c file.
>
> a) Source compiled to .o files on NFS filesystem.
> Executable written to NFS file system.
>
> b) Source compiled to .o files on NFS file system.
> Executable written to local filesystem on Linux box.
>
> c) Source compiled to .o files on local file system.
> Executable written to local file system.
>
> d) Source compiled to .o files on local file system.
> Executable written to NFS file system.
>
> 3) Results:
>
> a) All of the .o files compiled to either the local
> or NFS file systems compare as Identical.
>
> b) Executables that are written on the NFS file system
> do NOT work. They generate an error:
> Memory Fault (core dump).
>
> c) Executables that are written to the local file
> system from either local or NFS .o files work
> correctly.
>
> d) A byte by byte comparison of the executable files
> shows that they only differ by about 12k bytes out of
> 4Mb. The difference is that a few zeroes have
> crept into the corrupt executable image. Usually just
> one or two here and there that shift the binary
> code by a byte or two for sections of the corrupt executable.
> Most of the executable is identical and the areas where
> a zero or two have been inserted are also identical except
> for the offset.
>
> The whole 12k of appears to be caused by a handful
> of corruptions where these extra zeroes offset the
> executable code for a section.
>
> 4) Conclusion:
>
> It appears as if the linker is having some sort
> of problem with writing a complete executable on
> an NFS mounted file system. Compile and link to
> a local drive from either local or NFS .o works
> correctly. Compile and link to an NFS file system
> from either local or NFS .o files generates a
> corrupt executable.
>
> I have not yet seen any other NFS file corruption
> problems despite extensive compilation (not linking)
> and editing of source code - it only appears to
> happen in this one context so far.
>
> This could be related to the IBM NFS implementation
> but I would have thought it would impact other
> applications as well. At the moment it looks
> like a linker/NFS (or IBM NFS iteraction) bug.
>
> At least one other report of a problem with similar
> symptoms on similar hardware has been reported on the
> comp.os.linux.* newsgroups but no solution seems to be
> available.
>
> I have tried building the 2.3.13 kernel to see if this
> makes any difference but the first attempt failed to
> run :-)
>
> Thanks for any help or suggestions.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
> --
> David Elder University of Toronto
> Institute for Aerospace Studies
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fusion Research Group
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux Netzwerk Programmierung
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:18:04 GMT
comp.os.linux.networking seems to have some very knowledgable
visitors... also, you may want to check out deja.com and see if your
questions have already been answered...
On Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:09:36 +0200, Alexander Landa
<Alexander:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hallo alle zusammen.
>
>I have some questions about chatserverprogramming under Linux and
>looking
>for som applicable newsgroup to place this questions.
>
>Thanks for your help!
>
>Alex
>
------------------------------
From: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba PFD
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:31:10 -0700
http://www.sfu.ca/~yzhang/linux/
Larry Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:UOfy3.57$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can someone please direct me to this how to. I am looking for the pdf file
> specifically.
>
> --
> Larry Rivera
> LD Studio
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 22:03:04 -0700
From: Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ping Problem??
[Using RedHat Linux]
I have 2 computers, one running RH5.1 and the other running RH6.0. When
I setup the RH5.1 computer as IP address 192.168.1.1 and the RH6
computer as 192.168.1.10, I am able to "ping" and "telnet" RH5.1
computer from RH6, and vice versa. But, when I keep RH5.1 computer as
192.168.1.1 and change RH6 as 192.168.2.2, I cannot "ping" or "telnet"
RH5.1 from RH6 and vice versa. Even with the change in IP address the
subnet of 255.255.255.0 does not change so I should be able to "ping"
these computers no matter what. But for some reason I cannot. Anybody
have any ideas??
Vincent
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
