Linux-Networking Digest #425, Volume #10 Mon, 8 Mar 99 17:13:58 EST
Contents:
tunneling through a campus LAN ? ("Cameron Spitzer")
Re: Linux <-> Netscape ("Gero H. Marten")
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (childsplay)
Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2??? (Eric)
Re: Can't get Reverse Lookup Zones to Load!!!! (Carles Arjona)
Re: Logging into Samba from Windoze 98 (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: how do I turn on IP fwding.. (Carles Arjona)
Re: To make PPP accessible to all ...? (Carles Arjona)
Re: Desperately seeking help on TIMEDC (Carles Arjona)
Re: ppp help please (Carles Arjona)
Re: Linux networking nukes kernel of SCO box. ("Dan Tager")
Re: Cable Modem and Samba (Rick Onanian)
Re: telnet problem to linux box ("Dr. Yuan Liu")
Re: Linux <-> Netscape (Rick Onanian)
Link Aggregagation (Bill Northup)
Re: NFS exports unmountable under AIX (Brian Gorka)
Re: Will Linux work for me? ("lunchmeat7")
Re: Firewall: Security issue? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: cracker using su on account nobody (Mathew A. Hennessy)
Sendmail Multihoming ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
appletalk si, TCP no! ("Michael Cox")
One time password and PAM :) ("Duarte Cordeiro")
Cant get rexecd working right... (John O'Donnell)
Re: Should I try Linux? (Rick Onanian)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Cameron Spitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tunneling through a campus LAN ?
Date: 8 Mar 1999 21:00:39 GMT
Let's say, hypothetically of course, that I have a Sun Solaris machine "marsbase"
with dedicated ISDN line on a Pipeline 75 "ISDN router."
Let's call the segment with marsbase and the router "marsnet."
The other end of the ISDN line is "earthnet."
The router configuration is frozen and I cannot change it,
and the only place it can call is earthnet, which is behind a corporate
campus firewall.
I also have root on a friendly internet-connected Linux machine, outside
the firewall, "babylonstation."
And I have a user (not root) account on "earthmole" which is on earthnet.
Marsbase can telnet to earthmole and earthmole can telnet, FTP, and HTTP
to bablylonstation through a proxy. Other ports are not open
in the routers, except for DNS.
"Marsbase" cannot telnet to the world because of the firewall,
and the world cannot telnet into anything behind the firewall.
Now, I want to add a Linux PC "rebelbase" to marsnet, and the users on
rebelbase want to see the Internet as if they were on babylonstation.
If they can't have total transparency the rebels will take what they
can get.
We have:
[marsnet] [earthnet] [Internet]
rebelbase --+-- router ==[ISDN]== router --+-- firewall --+--+--+-- bablylonstation
| |
| |
marsbase earthmole
Can this be done? What do we run, where? Which HOWTOs cover this
kind of tunneling?
TIA
Cameron
------------------------------
From: "Gero H. Marten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux <-> Netscape
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 21:21:35 +0100
Ron wrote:
> I can't seem to make Netscape understand to get my mail from an other place
> than 127.0.0.1, I can change the starting-page a hundred times, doesn't
> work...
> I change all the appr. settings, and they just don't get saved...
>
> Is this the ususal thing with Netscape or am I missing something here?
>
> RH Linux 5.2
> Netscape 4.07
I had something similar with NS 4.05. In my home .netscape directory I
deleted the preferences.js file. When starting NS again a new
preferences.js was automatically made and everything worked fine again.
Of course be sure to make a backup copy of the file before you delete
it, just in case.
--
Gero H. Marten
<http://www.provi.de/gmarten/index.html>
--
------------------------------
From: childsplay <"childsplay"@planetquake.com (no Spam)>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 13:37:33 -0600
This is just for those ppl who htink Windows is som much better, maybe it
will help them see the light
Robert Bentley wrote:
> All I want to know is what this has to do with linux , and this newsgroup
--
Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 14539920 ============
]TeamGameSpy[ ============
http://www.gamespy.com ===
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2???
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 14:10:50 -0700
Aaron Saikovski wrote:
> Please Help!!
> I have followed the how-to's to the letter, I have used the Linus
> pocketbook.
> I cannot get the 2.2.2 kernel to work correctly under RedHat 5.2.
>
> I compiled the kernel, removed static links to linux, I have made the
> modules, made the modules_install.
> I have moved the zImage to /boot.
> When I reboot and try to boot the new kernel, it causes a total system
> reboot..
> In the /boot directory there is still initrd etc files...
>
> Is there an updated version of the kernel how-to that focuses primarily on
> redhat5.2 and the latest kernel build?
> I have followed the how-to to the letter and it doesn't workj with redhat
> 5.2
> Please help!!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Aaron
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redhat has a how to for upgrading 5.2 to the new kernel, it outlines all of
the packages you need to update, and walks you through it.
Eric
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't get Reverse Lookup Zones to Load!!!!
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:00:36 +0100
SWBELL NEWS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Our previous DNS LINUX Server (Linux 4x) worked fine with loading the
> reverse lookup zones. But as soon as we upgraded it to 5.2 they WOULD NOT
> load.
<cut>
> we figured out it uses named.conf instead of named.boot
> with the new 5.2 ver.
I guess you are talking about RedHat 5.2 Linux. If so,
cd /etc
/usr/doc/bind-8.1.2/named-bootconf.pl < named.boot > named.conf
./rc.d/init.d/named stop
./rc.d/init.d/named start
Regards.
--
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Logging into Samba from Windoze 98
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 15:24:23 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Did you setup smbpasswd? See man smbpasswd.
d
"W.D. Allen" wrote:
>
> I have been trying to get Samba connectivity from my Linux box to my W98
>
> client box.
>
> From my W98 box, I can see the Linux box in the Mygroup that Samba is
>
> broadcasting. However, when I double click the linux box, it identifies
>
> itself as //Linuxbox/IPC$ - and then wants a password.
>
> I followed the instructions in the Linux Network Toolkit book (published
>
> by IDG), but it obviously leaves out some important information. What do
>
> I need to really do, is there a mini-howto that specifically addresses
>
> what should be a realatively simple Samba connectivity setup? The Samba-
>
> Howto is about as clear as mud. If someone could give me a short step-by-
>
> step, I would really appreciate it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> WDA
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: how do I turn on IP fwding..
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:00:26 +0100
Developpement wrote:
>
> Marc Hering wrote:
>
> > FORWARD_IPV4=no
> > change to yes
>
> With this, you have to reboot
> But if you want to enable it just now, type :
>
> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
/etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
works also (and no rebooting needed).
Regards.
--
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: To make PPP accessible to all ...?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:00:52 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Note that there is also a /usr/sbin/pppd-2.3* I don't know if this is
> significant.
Yes, it is. pppd-2.3 supports demand-dialling mode.
> How do I allow my girlfriend to run ppp-go without root privileges?
I like eznet, simple although not automatic:
http://www.hwaci.com/sw/eznet/
> How do I
> set it up so that all she has to do is open Netscape on her laptop, for
> example, for it to connect automatically ..?
Look for the demand option description in the pppd man page.
Some people prefers diald: http://www.loonie.net/%7Eeschenk/diald.html
Regards.
--
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Desperately seeking help on TIMEDC
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:00:41 +0100
Donald Ellis wrote:
>
> I am running Redhat Linux 5.2.
>
> I get the error message:
>
> recvfrom (date read): connection refused
>
> Yes I do have timed running on both servers. I have also tried killing
> timed and running xntpd. I get the same message.
xntpd and xntpdc seems to work on my RedHat 5.2 Linux (at home i just
can test it via localhost).
[root@localhost /]# /usr/sbin/xntpd
[root@localhost /]# /usr/sbin/xntpdc -l localhost
client LOCAL(0)
Regards.
--
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: Carles Arjona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp help please
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:00:44 +0100
Ed Jones wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (RLopez6836) wrote:
> >
> > PPP files are all over my drive. When I run /sbin/pppd
> > i get the message "kernel not compiled for ppp, or modules not loaded".
>
> However, I thought that the default distribution of
> redhat had this compiled into the kernel.
It's compiled as a module in RedHat 5.0 and 5.2 Linux (and it was also
in my old Slackware 3.1). You might look for the ppp.o module of your
precompiled kernel with:
/sbin/modprobe -l ppp*
Modules are automaticaly loaded by the kerneld daemon ( /sbin/kerneld ).
modprobe, kerneld and other module utilities are included in the
modutils-*.rpm package (modutils-2.1.85-9.i386.rpm on RedHat 5.2), so
you might test if modutils is already installed with:
rpm -qi modutils
and if kerneld is runing:
ps ax | grep kerneld
on a RedHat Linux box.
Regards.
Carles Arjona [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please, just remove the second NOSPAM for replies from newsgroups.
(Yes, NOSPAM is my real username)
[Don't send me e-mail copies of usenet postings, please]
------------------------------
From: "Dan Tager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.sco.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Linux networking nukes kernel of SCO box.
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:51:11 -0500
Craig Macbride wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Easy way to crash SCO OSR 5.0.5 kernel:
>
>1) Attach Linux machine to network, with lpd pointed at SCO box.
>2) Wait about 2 hours.
>3) SCO kernel panics with trap type E in kernel function tcp_linput while
>running lpd.
>
>(In particular, this happens with 5.2 Redhat running 2.0.36 Linux kernel
>and SCO 5.0.5 with rs505a and app477a loaded.)
>
>I'd like to request that Linux developers try to nuke Windoze boxes
>and leave SCO boxes alone. :-)
>
Hmmm... I've had a Linux box, 2.0.35, with lpd pointing to a SCO box, 5.0.2c
with OSS468 and 449. Both have been up for many months now with no
problems. Did something break in newer versions? I'm getting ready to
upgrade our SCO box to 5.0.5. I guess I better do some testing....
--Dan
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cable Modem and Samba
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:03:43 -0500
Randy Kayfish wrote:
>
> I am running RedHat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36 and have my cable modem
> running just fine. I was thinking of getting Samba going as well to my
> Win98 machine. Shaw Cable uses dhcp to give me my ip address so I tried
> adding a route/host etc (192.168.1.1) for Samba to use. I have had no
> luck getting my cable modem and Samba to work together. Do I need 2
> nics to accomplish this? I tried disabling dhcp and setting my own IP
> but then I can't connect to the net. If I assign a route to eth0 (Cable
> Modem) and try to ping it I get "Network is Unreachable". Any help
> appreciated.
>
> Randy
What do you want to accomplish? Samba has absolutely nothing to do with
your cable modem. Samba would be for you to share files and printers
using the IPX protocol (and similar microsoft and netware protocols).
If you're interested in being able to browse from both computers at
the same time, than what you want is IP masquerading. The home page
for IP masquerading is http://ipmasq.cjb.net and has most of the
info you need on it. You are better off with 2 nics, but not required.
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
To email me, take out the papers and the trash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Dr. Yuan Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnet problem to linux box
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:18:31 -0500
Purnendu Sinha wrote:
>
> cannot telnet from the windows box to linux box. Though I get the login
> prompt, I cannot login even with the correct user id and password.
If you get the login prompt, that's not the telnet problem. Are you
sure you were not trying to login as "root?"
--
+--- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------- http://www.ChiTech.ca/ ---+
| Dr. Yuan LIU - Chitech Technologies Inc. |
+------- (514)281-0494 ------------------ FAX (514)281-0493 ------+
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux <-> Netscape
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:10:28 -0500
Ron wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I can't seem to make Netscape understand to get my mail from an other place
> than 127.0.0.1, I can change the starting-page a hundred times, doesn't
> work...
You changed the start page? That only changes what web page shows up
when you start up netscape and click on the home button.
Check in preferences, under Mail & Newsgroups, the Mail Servers section.
You should be able to change it there.
> I change all the appr. settings, and they just don't get saved...
>
> Is this the ususal thing with Netscape or am I missing something here?
>
> RH Linux 5.2
> Netscape 4.07
>
> Tia,
>
> Ron
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
To email me, take out the papers and the trash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Bill Northup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Link Aggregagation
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:12:40 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was just wondering if anyone was working on Link Aggragation for
Linux?
There has been a lot of talk about this in the networking press and it
is something that sounds useful for a busy server.
Bill
------------------------------
From: Brian Gorka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS exports unmountable under AIX
Date: 08 Mar 1999 08:23:17 -0500
>>>>> "bill" == bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
bill> Filesystems exported from Linux seem unmountable under
bill> AIX. I've tried the 2.0.33, 2.0.36, and 2.1.131 (each with
bill> the appropriate nfsd). I have not tried the knfsd, but let's
bill> assume that the user level NFS has not been broken all these
bill> years. All I get is "The file permissions do not allow the
bill> desired operation." They do on other Linux boxes, AIX mounts
bill> off of other AIX, Linux mounts off AIX, etc.
It works fine under AIX 4.2.1 and below. With AIX 4.3.x, they changed
a LOT of the NFS subsystem.
There are 2 solutions to get AIX to mount a Linux export.
1) Add nfso -o nfs_use_reserved_ports=1 to the AIX system's startup
sequence.
2) Change (assumeing RH 5.x) the line under start in
/etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs to read:
;; Start
daemon rpc.nfsd --allow-non-root
What is happening, is AIX is trying to mount to using a non-secure
port (> 1024), and Linux won't let it. --allow-non-root means that it
will take a port > 1024.
I have noticed that AIX 4.3.x causes the nfsd to crash (b37)... But,
that's why I'm even reading this group now.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <Brian Gorka>
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. But what of the man
who possesses too much knowledge? If knowledge is power...and power
corrupts...how will humankind ever survive?
------------------------------
From: "lunchmeat7" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Will Linux work for me?
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 13:03:37 -0500
you may have failed to mention the fileservers present OS,
but i'll assume windows NT(?)
you might want to start by setting up a firewall/proxy and or ip
masquerade using linux, and keep your fileserver internal
and not directly connected to the internet. now all 12 workstations
will have access to the internet and if configured correctly well
protected. if that is what you want...
install linux on a workstation, extra-computer or think about migrating
to a linux fileserver over time, save yourself the teardown and then
possible
rebuild if it for some reason doesn't work. i always err on the side of
caution
when there is months or even years of work at risk. The cost of phasing in
one
extra fileserver is easily offset by the man hours it takes trying to
restore
something you lost from backup. or even the headache alone of putting it
back
they way things where before.
i am entirely bullish about linux in office and in critical situations, but
think
of the time to train yourself or others how to access it, administrate it,
or
recover from some unforseen disaster. Linux will work as a fileserver just
fine
but this deserves some kid gloves, make sure all of the devices hanging off
or in the fileserver are supported by Linux. all the devices listed are
supported
if memory serves, but cdwriting is alittle more tricky under linux than NT,
as is
most things with *NIX and you will need time to adjust, and backups are just
too
important to flirt with...
in short, i just want to preserve the gratification you'll feel when the
word
" user liscence " disapears from your vocabulary coupled with the increased
performance of linux as a stable fileserver platform over NT. ;-)
HTH
Wb wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t>...
>I am considering changing our fileserver OS to Redhat Linux
>and would like to here some comments about this, pro's and
>cons.
>
>We have in the office:
> 12 nt workstations primarily running autocad.
> 1 accounting computer
> 1 computer for a print server
> 1 computer for the fileserver and internet connection.
>
>The fileserver;
> PII-300
> 3-com pci network card
> US robotics 56k modem
> HP7200i re-writable cd-rom
>
>
>We do daily backup onto the cdrom and have modem sharing
>software so 3 of the computers can access the internet at the
>same time.
>I personally have limited experience on hp-ux workstations.
>Any feedback would be appreciated.
>
>Thanks in advance.
>Walter
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Firewall: Security issue?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 15:50:07 GMT
Thanks M.C.,
I have found the description in RFC 1256. Now I would like to ask if this is a
security issue? Why are these 5 hosts (out of perhaps 1000s on my ISP) doing
router discovery and nobody else? What kind of information could I be giving
away if I accept these ICMP/10 packets? Is there any subterfuge possible with
there packets?
Thanks,
Nick Bourbaki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "nospamplease." to e-mail me)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"M.C. van den Bovenkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have recently implemented a firewall with IP masquarading, and I'm logging
a
> > few denys to ICMP/10 packets from only about 5 machines with destination
> > 224.0.0.2.
> >
> > Now I tried "looking up" ICMP/10 packets since 10 is not one of the standard
> > types. I couldn't find what this type was. I also thought that 224.0.0.2 was
> > one of the experimental IP addresses.
> >
> > Does anyone know what these ICMP packets are and why am I denying these
> > packets since they aren't addressed to my ISP assigned IP address?
>
> ICMP type 10 is 'Router Selection', and 224.0.0.2 is the 'All Routers On
> This Subnet' multicast address. Looks like those 5 machines are trying
> to do ICMP router discovery.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Marco van den Bovenkamp.
>
> CIO EMEA Network Design Engineer,
>
> Lucent Technologies Nederland.
> Room: HVS BZK 32
> Tel.: (+31-35-687)2724
> Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mathew A. Hennessy)
Subject: Re: cracker using su on account nobody
Date: 8 Mar 1999 21:48:19 GMT
In article <0xVE2.2983$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
rcurtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks!, I checked the cron log and noted that the daily routine ran just
>at the time stamp of the su entry as nobody in the messages log. Looks like
>the daily routine for updateb runs as su nobody.
btw: one way to put a touch more security on su is to chmod it so that
only a particular group (the 'su' group) can run it, then put only
yourself into that group.. many administrative utilities come with pretty
liberal execution rights. anything setuid should probably be no more
permissible than mod 4750, except for necessary progs like passwd. Though
it's a simple matter to discover who's permitted to run su
$ ls -l $PATH/su
$ grep $group /etc/group
it means that Josephine Cracker has to crack your username, and
you used a securID for your username, right? ;)
Best of luck,
--
Mathew A. Hennessy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
'So the next time someone says, "I have a 50K file for you," your next
exclamation needs to be, "Wow, that's cold!"' - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://208.201.18.9/shout/ mp3 feeds 24/7 (barring net hangs ;)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sendmail Multihoming
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:57:44 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
we need some experts hints....
We built up a SUSE linux V6.0 system with sendmail. We would like to run
several hundreds of domains on it.
We want to give every domain a separate IP-address (for logging
purposes).
We defined 200 IPs for testing, everything seems to work.
But if we send mails via SMTP to any other IP than the first (x.x.x.1),
there comes up a message saying "Networ error, Connection reset by peer"
in the mail client. Not alsways but the bigger the mail, the more often
it happens.
Every helpful comment is welcome.... Please also direct your answers to
my mail-address
Thanx
Johannes
------------------------------
From: "Michael Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: appletalk si, TCP no!
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:45:03 -0800
ok...i'm frustrated...
i'm running RedHat 5.2 on a P133 with a Linksys Ne2000 card, PNP disabled,
and cant get out of localhost
i have a Win98 box, a Mac 7200, and the Linuxbox, all networked thru a
LanPro hub
linuxbox is 192.168.0.1, winbox is 192.168.0.2, Mac is 192.168.0.3,
IPv4 is off, proto is none,
Ping doesn't get me anywhere..."host unreachable"
BUT...i installed netatalk-1.4b2+asun2.1.1 and it works!
(which means, i assume, that the cards and hub and ethernet setup on the
linuxbox work)
any suggestions on something to try?
------------------------------
From: "Duarte Cordeiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: One time password and PAM :)
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 18:09:20 -0000
Kevin Martin wrote in message ...
>There are a few of these; the one I know best is called s/key.
First of all, thanks for your answer. It was very helpfull, as you can see
:)
Downloaded skey for linux +pam..
I followed all the steps, but it doens't seems to work :(
I just edited /etc/pam.d/su (or login, but when I try to login doesn't ask
my for sky password).
Don't really know what to put in this file, so I just copied the other
lines, and substituted all .so for pam_skey.so...
auth required /lib/security/pam_skey.so
account required /lib/security/pam_skey.so
password required /lib/security/pam_skey.so
session required /lib/security/pam_skey.so
and then I run keyinit:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]# keyinit
Adding root:
Reminder [blabla...]
Enter secret password:duarte cordeiro [not showed]
Again secret password:duarte cordeiro [not showed]
ID root s/key is 99 sa16333
MILL OTIS HICK WADE GONG KURT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED]]#
[duarte@sauron duarte]$ su -l
s/key 98 sa16333:
(on another shell)
[duarte@sauron duarte]$ key 98 sa16333
Enter secret password:duarte cordeiro
SINE JOG COCK FUM RIFT HEWN
(Back on su -l window)
[duarte@sauron duarte]$ su -l
s/key 98 sa16333: SINE JOG COCK FUM RIFT HEWN
su: incorrect password
[duarte@sauron duarte]$
on /var/log/messages (when s/key waits for password):
pam[5284]:unable to resolve symbol: pam_sm_acct_mgmt, pam_sm_chautook,
pam_sm_open_session, pam_sm_close_session
.....one in each line
Maybe I've made something wrong while configuring PAM, no ?
Thanx for all the help ,
Duarte Cordeiro
------------------------------
From: John O'Donnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cant get rexecd working right...
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:07:06 -0500
Has anyone had a problem with rexecd like this one? I am trying to do
an rexec from a remote OS/2 box. This works with my SCO Open Server 5
and 3.2v4.2 boxes. I see in my /usr/adm/messages that the request came in
but my command does not execute!!!!?!?!?
|johnny:~# telnet tom
|
| OS/2 Version 2.4 (tom)
|
|Enter your password: .......
|
|[<tom>-C:\]rexec -l root -p ......... johnny ls -l
|.... AND NOTHING EVER HAPPENS - NOR DOES THE PROGRAM RETURN ....
In my /usr/adm/messages I get:
Mar 8 15:50:31 johnny in.rexecd[18094]: connect from tom
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Johnny O
--
John O'Donnell (Sr. Systems Engineer, Web master, Network Admin, etc...)
Voice FX Corporation
1100 E. Hector Street www.voicefx.com
Suite 416 www.getgrades.com
Conshohocken, PA 19428 www.gettranscript.com
Phone: (610)941-1000 www.getfinaid.com
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.campusdirect.com
[ Remove "nospam-" from the e-mail address ]
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Should I try Linux?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:50:24 -0500
This is a very common situation, usually involving IP Masquerading.
IP Masquerading is basically the same as NAT. Check out
http://ipmasq.cjb.net for the official home page. IP Masq is built into
the kernel. I have it running on a 386 with no hard drive and it runs
beautifully. Check out http://www.linuxrouter.org for info on how to do
that.
It's definately worth learning and doing. You end up with a good
understanding of a lot of stuff you otherwise wouldn't know, and
soemthing to brag about. ;)
"H.A" wrote:
>
> Hi:
> In my house there are 4 computers. One is a P166/32MB and the other 3
> are all PII266. I would like to set up internet access for the entire house
> using the P166 as the server.
>
> I can do this now with win95/98 and an add on Network Address Translator
> program called Winroute. The program is great but only 2 problems. It is
> shareware and limited to only 4 users. (of course another problem is that it
> runs on the windows platform, hehe)
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1. Does linux have all I need within the operating system to be able to do
> without buying add-ons?
> 2. Would it be worth it to learn how to do this on Linux?
> 3. Can anyone point me to a good concise source of info on how to set up
> such a network?
>
> Hearty thank yous all around!
> Hisham
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
To email me, take out the papers and the trash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
