Linux-Networking Digest #425, Volume #11 Sat, 5 Jun 99 23:13:32 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Bernd Eckenfels)
Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken (Bernd Eckenfels)
Samba (Chris Emig)
pppd permission ("SpiKe")
Re: samba and win98 reg hack (Brian Witowski)
Re: Basic setup? What do I need ? (David M. Cook)
Re: Samba Server (Brian Witowski)
Re: Call me clueless... (Jakey)
Re: ipchains & Email, new issue (Gutrot)
Re: network activity tracker. ("Curt")
What could it be? Help needed (Denis)
Re: Nice Design Computer Rack Chassis ("Curt")
ethernet config under RH5.2, kernel 2.2.3 (jychat)
Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output... ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PPPD error message (Clifford Kite)
Re: SOCKS5 ("Curt")
RH 6.0 and IPCHAINS (Greg_Kettmann)
Re: Making an ICQ server ("glenn")
Re: Mount FTP? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Routing not working between eth0 and tr0: Help! ("Curt")
Re: Printing across from linux to win95 via LAN (Hamka Hj Suleiman)
Re: $SOCKS_N Environment ("Curt")
Linux-2.2.9 and Road Runner (Meling Mudin)
Re: Framing errors, still got 'em (Glen Parker)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comm.internet.routing
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
Date: 6 Jun 1999 01:13:35 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Detlef Bosau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ich schreibe jetzt nicht, was ich jetzt denke .....
Keine Sorge ich kann es mir denken :)
Gruss
Bernd
------------------------------
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.comm.internet.routing
Subject: Re: Linux: ICMP Redirect, IP Source Routing unterdruecken
Date: 6 Jun 1999 01:17:14 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Detlef Bosau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aber zum NetBEUI. Das Problem ist nicht nur die Last.
NetBios...
> Das Problem ist
> einfach die Stabilitaet. Die Regeln, nach denen Masterbrowser werden,
> sind halbwegs undurchsichtig. Wann diese seltsamen Masterbrowser
> zur Namensaufloesung verwendet werden, wann ein WINS Server und
> wann ein DNS mit Ketchup und Mayo habe ich diverse Microsofties
> gefragt, die Antworten reichten von abenteuerlich bis grausig.
> Aber zwei Dinge sind mir klar geworden: Erstens haben die
> sich _alle_ widersprochen und zweitens weiss das selbst Microsoft
> vermutlich nicht richtig.
In der samba doku ist das erstaunlich klar beschrieben.
> Ich wuerde normalerweise, wenn das vom IP Design her sinnvoll gehen
> wuerde, am liebsten jeden NT-Rechner in ein isoliertes IP-Segment stellen.
> Dann kann er wenigstens niemand anderem Schaden zufuegen.
Und dann verwendest du Wins ohne Broadcast-Backup? Wo ist da der
Stabilitaetsvorteil?
Gruss
Bernd
------------------------------
From: Chris Emig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 01:22:54 GMT
Hello. Does anyone here know how I can implement TCP/IP in WfWg so I can
get it working with Samba? Right now, the "computer" has no name
resolution whatsoever without TCP (lmhosts and all that). Thanks.
Chris
------------------------------
From: "SpiKe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd permission
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 13:39:20 +0100
Right, I followed an instruction thingy that got me on to the net with pppd
etc... problem is... I can't seem to change pppd so that it can be used by
all users! I've tried chmod a+rx pppd but it didn't work! Any help will be
much appreciated.
--
- Chris
============
ICQ: 5303485
------------------------------
From: Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba and win98 reg hack
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 21:06:18 -0400
Don't mess with smbpasswd unless you really have security issues.
Dont use caps in your password. I fought with one username
that couldn't log in. After a couple hours I realized that an upper case
character was being converted to lower case.
To send plain-text pass words go to:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\VxD\VNETSUP and change
the value for EnablePlainTextPassword key to 01 00 00 00 00
Brian
Dave wrote:
> i have it all set up...only prob is that i ALWAYS get "bad password" when i
> login via my win98 box..where can i get hte registry patch for that so that
> it allows plain text? or what do i need? plz help...thanks
> -dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David M. Cook)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Basic setup? What do I need ?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 01:21:37 GMT
On Wed, 02 Jun 1999 22:22:52 GMT, Lee Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>questionable reviews, like Pump,
AFAIK, the pump that is shipped with 6.0 only has problems with non-standard
DHCP servers.
Dave Cook
------------------------------
From: Brian Witowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba Server
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 21:09:40 -0400
Here is what I added to the sbm.conf:
# A private directory, usable only by Administrator. Note that administrator
# requires write access to the directory.
[Administrator]
comment = Administrative Share
path = /
valid users = root brianw
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
Then I log in as root when i want full access.
Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What must I set in smb.conf in order to access my Samba server as root? I
>
> want to be able to see the whole directory tree on the server from my
>
> Windows client.
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jakey)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Call me clueless...
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 01:08:09 GMT
On 25 May 1999 12:44:38 GMT, Greg Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> "Tim" == Tim Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tim> Where did you get your 172.20 addresses from? As I recall,
> Tim> these are not private addresses. That's OK if you have real,
> Table 1: Private IP Address Space
> Class Starting Ending Number CIDR Representation
> Number
>
> A 10.0.0.0 10.255.255.255 10/8
> B 172.16.0.0 172.31.255.255 172.16/12
> C 192.168.0.0 192.168.255.255 192.168/16
IIRC some ip's are not routable, i thought it was the 172.* ones but i
could be wrong :)
(i'd recommend double checking that though:)
-Jacob
------------------------------
From: Gutrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains & Email, new issue
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 00:26:47 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matt Templeton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any issues with MS Exchange or sendmail sending outbound
SMTP
> though ipchains doing masquerading???
>
> Thanks, Matt
>
--
========================================================================
Build a system even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: network activity tracker.
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 20:54:34 -0500
mrtg is works pretty good for this
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html
also in RPM form from RH
Gutrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7jc5h5$frq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm looking for a program that will monitor metwork activity on my
> simple network. My network is two windows95 machines masq'd
> through my RH5 box.
>
> An exapmle of what I'm looking for:
>
> Say one of the windows95 machines, I start downloading something big
> via ftp and I leave it. I then leave the house and go to work, while
> it downloads. What I would like to see is how many packets are going
> through my network machine when I ssh to it from work... so I can see
> how fast the download is going or if it has completed. Something that
> displayed kb/sec going through my modem would be awesome!
>
> Any known console tools that would do this for me...?
>
> -Gut
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Build a system even a fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Denis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What could it be? Help needed
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 21:21:47 -0400
hi,
I encountered a problem that I don't understand at all.
It's a problem with my ISP connection, which before worked
just fine for many months.
Here it is:
I CAN
connect to my school (ISP) via a modem, can surve the web (with
Netscape, for example), can read/post to newsgroups like this one,
BUT I CAN'T
withdraw emails from the school, nor can I even telnet it from a terminal
window - in Win95 on the other hand everything remains fine, there both
things work. I also tried telneting to another account - it worked and then
from that account to the one where my email is - it worked, too.
(when trying to get new mail, I get "Server was not found",
when "[denis@localhost denis]$ telnet godzilla.acpub.duke.edu", I get
"godzilla.acpub.duke.edu: Host name lookup failure ")
my linux experiences are driving me crazy, if somebody can please help me
understand what is going on?
thanks a lot.
Denis
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.design.product,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Nice Design Computer Rack Chassis
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 21:02:11 -0500
We have good luck with Texas Micro. http://www.texmicro.com/
Gerald Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7jbfdk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Craig Mitracs wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > does anybody know a distributor who sells PC rackmount computers - in a
> > really good design?
> >
> > I am browsing the web for that since a few days - and found nothing
yet...
> > The only Rack Computers that look really good are "real" computers (SGI,
> > SUN) ...
> >
> > Thanks from Germany -
> >
> > Craig
>
> Craig:
>
> My company is working on rack-mounted (and standard) Linux boxes, and
expect
> to get them on the market starting this summer. Unfortunately, we haven't
> looked into export arrangements yet, but I can't think of a reason why we
> wouldn't.
>
> Check our website in early July (www.linuxpcs.com)
>
> Gerald Jensen
>
>
------------------------------
From: jychat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ethernet config under RH5.2, kernel 2.2.3
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 01:50:26 GMT
hi !
i've got an AMD K6-2 350MHz and a Pentium 233MMX.
i want to configure the K6 as server for the Pentium. I've 2 Realtech
ethernet cards.
what is the procedure ? I'm a rookie in networking with linux. Please
Help !
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Can't connect to my ISP yet, here's the pppd-output...
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 01:30:37 GMT
In article <7ja67d$825$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bill Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In <7j92tv$p8h$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Melle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>]Hi,
>]it's me again and the problem is still alive ... I can't connect to my ISP
>]running RH5.2.
>]But I got the idea of posting the pppd-output, maybe one of you out there
>]can do something with it to help me ;-)) It would be great.
>
>]Here it is:
>]----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>]-------------------
>]Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>]Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: Using interface ppp0
>]Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS3
>]Jun 4 19:19:18 PC pppd[456]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0xfba16783>
>]<pcomp> <accomp>]
>]Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0xfba16783>
>]<pcomp> <accomp>]
>]Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth
>]chap 80> <magic 0x7d7f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>]Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth
>]chap 80> <magic 0x7d7f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>]Jun 4 19:19:21 PC pppd[456]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic 0xfba16783>
>]<pcomp> <accomp>]
>]Jun 4 19:19:44 PC pppd[456]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
>]Jun 4 19:19:44 PC pppd[456]: Modem hangup
>]Jun 4 19:19:44 PC pppd[456]: Connection terminated.
>]Jun 4 19:19:45 PC pppd[456]: Exit.
>]----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>]-------------
>
>
>Get rid of kppp. I still do not know why people use it-- it seems to
>cause more problems than it is worth.
>
>Just write a script to give your ISP what it wants. See
>axion.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
>for instructions as to how to do it.
There can be all kinds of problems connecting to an ISP. In my case, when
I upgraded to a 2.2 kernel I could still connect to my ISP (sirius.com),
but about all I could do was ping! No telnet, no web browsing. Turns out
I had to set 'novj' as an option, another user gave me that tip and saved
me having to go through by trial and error (like he did, I tried to send
him email to thank him profusely, but never decoded his address correctly).
But, even though it works for me, it only works on some numbers with my
ISP. As a matter of fact, it works on the numbers I'm NOT supposed to use
with my V90 modem, with other numbers, I make the connection, login in
with the password, then it kicks me off. The ISP won't help me because
they only offer support for Macs and that other !&%#@ company. I'm on,
but it's half by black magic.
--
Praeterea censeo Micromolle non esse utendum.
("Moreover, I maintain that Microsoft should not be used." A toned down
adaptation of a sig from Cato the Elder regarding the city of Carthage.
---- Remove "UhUh" and "Spam" to get my real email address -----
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: PPPD error message
Date: 5 Jun 1999 20:49:39 -0500
FreeLorn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Does anyone know what the following errror message means which I get
: just after connecting to my ISP via PPP using an ISDN TA. The connection
: seems to work okay though.
: pppd[2076]: Received bad configure-nak/rej: 12 06 00 00 00 01
Here's my guess:
There were messages similar to
Mar 7 14:00:40 localhost pppd[980]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x14 < 12 06 00
00 00 01>]
Mar 7 14:00:40 localhost pppd[980]: rcvd [CCP ConfNak id=0x2 < 12 06 00
00 00 01>]
Mar 7 14:00:40 localhost pppd[980]: Received bad configure-nak/rej: 12
06 00 00 00 01
I *think* this is an unsolicited ConfNak where the ISP hints to pppd
that pppd must agree to send to the ISP with this option. I know that
for CCP the option is Microsoft PCC, aka MS-PCC, aka MPCC, and based on
STAC LZW compression, which is "patented" and so not available to pppd.
Since the TA connection works you needn't worry about it.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SOCKS5
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 20:48:45 -0500
sorry try http://www.socks.nec.com/
Curt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:u0_53.503$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> try downloading the source from http://www.nec.socks.com
> and compiling it on your system
>
> Stephen Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:EbF53.244$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I'm running RH6 (w/ kernel 2.2.9) on a Pentium 133 w/ 16 megs ram. I've
> got
> > ip_masq running but i need a SOCKS5 proxy as well - i downloaded the
> > socks5-server-1.0r4-1.rpm, installed it, and copied the
> > /usr/doc/socks5-server-1.0r4-1/socks5.conf-single.homed (or whatever the
> > file was called) to /etc/socks5.conf and set
> > SOCKS5_CONFFILE=/etc/socks5.conf. The problem is that when i run
socks5,
> i
> > get a segmentation fault every time. I tried reinstalling and
> redownloading
> > it but it still errors. Can anyone help?
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Hicks
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://home.tampabay.rr.com/kupopo/
> > icq: 5453914; aim: kupopo1
> >
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: Greg_Kettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Subject: RH 6.0 and IPCHAINS
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 09:58:50 -0400
I must say that RH 6.0 is much easier to prepare as a firewall than it's
predecessors. I installed RH 6.0 (Kernel 2.2.5). Both Ethernet (PCI
Tulip) adapters were recognized. I ran XCONFIG to configure firewalling
but it was set already. So, no recompile (at least so far).
I'm connected to the Internet through a 256Kb leased line and a Router.
It goes Leased Line <==> CSU/DSU <==> Router <= Ethernet Crossover Cable
=> Linux Firewall <==> Ethernet Hub. When I start the Linux box I can
start and run Netscape with no problems. That verifies the connections
and name servers. When I start the firewall I loose that ability and I
can't access the Internet from any of the network workstations (I never
have. This is a new installation.)
I have turned IP Forwarding on (at least through the graphical network
configuration tool). I'm NATing internal (10.x.x.x) traffic. Here are
my specific questions:
1) Should an "IPCHAINS -F" clear all rules? It doesn't seem to be
since I still can't use the local browser.
2) I should be able to issue three commands to just open the firewall
up (well maybe 4 if you add the flush)
First, input all, Second, output all, Third, NAT (Masq) all.
What would those commands be?
3) Any other suggestions? I'm using static addresses. Obviously step
two is an attempt to at least get it working and then I'll start locking
it down.
Thanks for any help. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "glenn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Making an ICQ server
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 02:08:36 GMT
as icq uses udp on port 4000 squid is not blocking it linux is
tell linux you need icq 4000 udp in the serviceas file and all will be
fixed
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mount FTP?
Date: 6 Jun 1999 03:31:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Pelkey scribbled manically:
: Hey, if anyone knows how to mount an FTP directory, I'd really
: appreciate it. Thanks.
Could you please rephrase the question? I'm not aware of any way
to mount something over ftp. You can _transfer_ things with ftp, and you
can mount remote filesystems with nfs, but AFAIK you can't mount things
with ftp. Unless you mean something entirely different, and I'm misinter-
preting your question, which is why I ask you to rephrase it.
JD
--
I was thrown out of fourth grade because I couldn't write my own name, and
it's been all downhill from there.
-- Linus Torvalds, in comp.os.mac.advocacy
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing not working between eth0 and tr0: Help!
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 20:58:30 -0500
if forwarding on?
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
David Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a Slackware Linux 2.0.34 box with:
> - an IBM 16/4 ISA Token-Ring card, (10.7.7.25)
> - a PCI NE2000 compatible ethernet card, (10.7.8.25)
> with each card defined on a different subnet. Each card works well on
> its own subnet (i.e.I can ping other computers), however I cannot get
> packets routed between the two subnets (i.e. I can't ping an ethernet PC
> from a token-ring PC). Although I'm fairly new to Linux, I believe my
> rc.inet1 is correct, based on what I've read in the how-to.
>
> I'd really appreciate any hints with this.
>
> Thanks,
> David Pineau
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: Hamka Hj Suleiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.networking,jaring.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Printing across from linux to win95 via LAN
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 10:34:16 +0800
Ujang Mohamad Zainudin wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> I am running a private LAN consist of three Win95 PCs and one RedHat
> 5.1.
> I have a laser printer attached to one of the Win95 PC and it is shared
> so that
> the other two Win95 can also print on it.
> I also have a dot-matrix printer attached to the RedHat PC.
> I'm just wondering if it is possible to configure my little personal
> network
> so that the Win95 PC could access the printer attached to the RedHat.
> Or maybe from linux I wish to print on the laser which is attached to
> the Win95.
> Any of you who've done this before or have any suggestions, i really
> would like to hear them...
>
> -Desperado
run samba ans share ur printer :)
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: $SOCKS_N Environment
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 1999 20:47:01 -0500
Oops! try http://www.socks.nec.com/
Jim Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> That site is not accessible.
> >specific name server. You might take a look at www.nec.socks.com for
more
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Meling Mudin)
Subject: Linux-2.2.9 and Road Runner
Date: 6 Jun 1999 02:39:41 GMT
Hi,
I am running Linux 2.2.9 and Road Runner (in Austin).
The problem is that our connection terminated occasinally.
What are the causes? This never happened when the
gateway machine ran WindowsNT a couple of weeks ago.
Could it be because we are running some services that
conflicts with rr?
--meling
------------------------------
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 19:41:31 -0700
From: Glen Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Framing errors, still got 'em
> I get a *very* occasional framing error when I boot the same hardware and
> connect under WfWG 3.11, so I'm sure it's not the chips 'n DIPs.
Me too. See my earlier post, "PPP hangs on '+++' characters, RH5.1,
kernel 2.0.36". I didn't mention there that I see frame errors also.
I've been messing with this for a few days now and just discovered that
it depends on the terminal server I dial into. I usually connect to a
Livingston Portmaster, but when I connect to a USRobotics server, the
problem goes away, so it seems there is a compatibility issue there.
Could be the modem I suppose, or the ppp implementation, I don't know.
Maybe a clue there for you anyway.
Glen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
