Linux-Networking Digest #699, Volume #10          Thu, 1 Apr 99 04:13:47 EST

Contents:
  Re: PPP connections problem with RedHat 5.2 (Jon-o Addleman)
  Re: PPP connections problem with RedHat 5.2 (Jon-o Addleman)
  Re: Slow ethernet LAN driving me crazy!! (brian moore)
  Re: Can't get netatalk-1.4b2 compiled on RH5.2 and gcc 2.7.2.3 (Wouter Boussemaere)
  Re: Newbie to Linux (Tomasz Sienicki | tsca)
  SIOCSIFNETMASK: bad value (Tomasz Sienicki | tsca)
  Re: RedHat Lousy Support ("Allen")
  Re: Need to configure routes at boot ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: 3c509b not found in slackware 3.6 kernel 2.2.5 ("Todd Goyen")
  Re: VPN via PPP over SSH routing trouble (Tim Wood)
  Installing eth cards (AMAE)
  Re: Newbie FTP Problem (esac)
  Re: Help with company address book - LDAP? (Alfred Gebert)
  PPP !! ERROR ("andylow")
  Re: IP_allow help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  RedHat Lousy Support (Villy Kruse)
  Help ??? (Adrian)
  RedHat 5.2 PPP hell (Frank Corey)
  Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Desmond Coughlan)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon-o Addleman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP connections problem with RedHat 5.2
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 23:41:18 GMT

Once upon a  Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:20:31 +0200, "Jean-Claude"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>In addition to minicom, I am opening another window and launch pppd like
>this : /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 28800
>
>But no way !!!

Quick point: you'll probably  want to use a number much higher than
28800 to allow for compression. There's no harm from using the max of
115200. (unless you're using a much slower modem -  my 2400 didn't
like it)
-- 

Jon-o Addleman

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon-o Addleman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP connections problem with RedHat 5.2
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 23:42:38 GMT

Once upon a  Tue, 30 Mar 1999 17:48:37 +0200, "Jean-Claude"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>If you are successful with minicom and a script, I'd like to have your point
>on this : I am trying to do the same and I get connected to some extent...
>What I can read on minicom is :
>
>Login:fti/jhkeci9
>Password:
>   Entering PPP session.
>   IP address is 164.138.33.139
>   MTU is 1500
>
>Then nothing... till I get disconneted a few seconds later...


That's curious... It should start spitting a jumble of odd characters
out when it's ready to start PPP. Perhaps it's using some
authentication that I don't know - PAP or CHAP - though I don't
*think* that it would ask for your login in that case. Did it work in
windows without tweaking?
-- 

Jon-o Addleman

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Slow ethernet LAN driving me crazy!!
Date: 1 Apr 1999 03:27:53 GMT

On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:33:11 -0800, 
 Stavros C. Kassinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> On the client box, Ifconfig gives some frame errors:
> 
> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:A0:CC:27:4D:36
>            inet addr:192.168.0.27  Bcast:192.168.0.255 
> Mask:255.255.255.0
>            UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>            RX packets:2705 errors:179 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:179

That would point at bad cables in my experience.

>From one of my machines:
eth0      Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet  HWaddr 00:60:97:24:FD:A5
          inet addr:xx.xx.xx.xx  Bcast:xx.xx.xx.xx Mask:255.255.255.192
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:11933768 errors:66 dropped:0 overruns:62
          TX packets:12060794 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0x300 

A MUCH lower error rate. 

Try replacing the cables.

(And, yes, you can see assymetric failures with bad twisted pair cables,
since one pair is Tx and one is Rx, the system with the icky Rx pair
will have problems receiving, though less problems sending.)

You may also want to see why you're running in promiscuous mode: that
will generate a LOT of extra interrupts (though not too bad on a
two-machine LAN).

-- 
Brian Moore                       | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
      Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker     |  a cockroach, except that the cockroach
      Usenet Vandal               |  is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
      Netscum, Bane of Elves.                 Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster

------------------------------

From: Wouter Boussemaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't get netatalk-1.4b2 compiled on RH5.2 and gcc 2.7.2.3
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 09:42:35 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============249209370D9A6A7E9815C782
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"Benny K.Y. Li" wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
>         I was trying to build netatalk 1.4b2 on Red Hat 5.2(kernel 2.0.36) with
> gcc 2.7.2.3 but failed.
>         When compiling the main.c of afpd component, it complains that one of
> symbol(essentially TIOCNOTTY, which is defined in asm/ioctls.h) is
> undefined. I tried to look at the included headers and it should be
> perfectly defined. I could compiled it without any modification on
> Slackware too.
>         Did anybody have similar experience? How did you solve that?
> 
> thanks
> Benny

I just added in etc/afpd/main.c
[snip]

#ifndef TIOCNOTTY
#define TIOCNOTTY       0x5422
#endif

[snip]

after all the include-files

hope this helps...
Wouter

ps.: but then i'm stuck in the linking

gcc    -O2 -fsigned-char -I../../include   -DAPPLCNAME -DCRLF   -o afpd
unix.o afs.o kuam.o send_to_kdc.o lifetime.o ofork.o main.o switch.o
auth.o volume.o directory.o file.o enumerate.o desktop.o filedir.o
fork.o appl.o gettok.o bprint.o -L../../libatalk   -latalk   
unix.o: In function `setdeskmode':
unix.o(.text+0x1c7): the `getwd' function is dangerous and should not be used.
auth.o: In function `clrtxt_login':
auth.o(.text+0x541): undefined reference to `crypt'
make[4]: *** [afpd] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/netatalk-1.4b2/etc/afpd'
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/netatalk-1.4b2/etc/afpd'
make[2]: *** [afpd] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/netatalk-1.4b2/etc'
make[1]: *** [../../etc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/netatalk-1.4b2/sys/linux'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Anyone???

TIA,
Wouter
==============249209370D9A6A7E9815C782
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="wouter.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Wouter Boussemaere
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="wouter.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Boussemaere;Wouter
tel;fax:+32 50 321 406
tel;home:+32 59 235 869
tel;work:+32 50 321 407
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.duo.be
org:DUO
adr:;;Filips de Goedelaan 7/1;Brugge;;8000;Belgium
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;1
fn:Wouter Boussemaere
end:vcard

==============249209370D9A6A7E9815C782==


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Sienicki | tsca)
Subject: Re: Newbie to Linux
Date: 1 Apr 1999 07:38:02 GMT

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
 [in <7du6o8$l4j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]: 

> Whats a good place to visit to acquire information about configuring
> Linux on a PC?  After the installation is done.

 take a look at /usr/doc/HOWTO/Config-HOWTO

-- 
 tsca 
 Tomasz Sienicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tomasz Sienicki | tsca)
Subject: SIOCSIFNETMASK: bad value
Date: 1 Apr 1999 07:38:01 GMT

  
  Hi,
  
  At boot time (when configuring eth0) I get a message
  
     SIOCSIFNETMASK: bad value
     route: bogus netmask 225.255.255.192
  
  and the network is of course unreachable. The problem is that
  according to the info I got from my new ISP, Subnet mask:
  255.255.255.192 
  
  What can I do with that?
  
  ~# uname -a
  Linux kmodem239 2.0.34 #1 Fri May 8 16:05:57 EDT 1998 i586 unknown

-- 
 tsca 
 Tomasz Sienicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: "Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: RedHat Lousy Support
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 07:43:10 GMT


I have business to run. I don't care how much I have to pay to get the
service. I am not a geek like you having fun wasting time trying to solve a
problem that does not make any business sense. Problem like system hanging
could have been pointed out (like Mark Burgo has) by Lilo: linux single. I
can't believe RedHat support cannot even make this simple reply!

I dealt with Sun. I think they have good support. Yes, I pay for higher
price for the OS, but I get things done -- That is business. If you don't
understand that, too sad.



>I'm not aware of ANY computer business where you can get ANY support of any
>kind for the money Red Hat charges for their Official CDs. Your complaint
>is therefore specious at best.
>
>If you need help, I would *strongly* suggest subscribing to one or more
>of the *many* Linux lists.

In article <xFrM2.28131$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just had my paid support treatment today after 36 hours waiting...
>
> Question:
> I have just installed a 2nd NIC on my RedHat 5.2. I added an entry in
> /etc/config.modules for this EtherExpress 16 ISA card (same as the 1st
NIC)
> and rebooted the PC. It is now hung on bootup.
>
> How do I stop the hanging? (ie. be able to log in again without
reinstalling
> RedHat).
>
> RedHat Support reply:
> Unfortunately, the sort of configuration you ask about doesn't’t come
under
> the installation support we provide.
>
> Any dummy can provide this kind of support. It's NOT support. It's all BS.
>
> I think I get better support than RedHat! I should not waste money and
time
> with RedHat.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Need to configure routes at boot
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 23:27:37 GMT

Ok..... there is a little app called linuxconf, when you create a route in
that app, it stays there, even on boot up. It's quite easy to use. You'll
see. Alternatively, you could create a file in your rc.d files to auto
execute the command you run.

I would opt for the first... it's the most relyable.

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: "Todd Goyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.linux,alt.linux.slakware,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.slackware,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 3c509b not found in slackware 3.6 kernel 2.2.5
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 03:52:13 GMT

Oh and one other thing
i have a dimaond viper v330 which refuses to give up irq 10
so i had to use three



------------------------------

From: Tim Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh,linux.redhat.ppp,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: VPN via PPP over SSH routing trouble
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 14:42:37 -0800

Eric Livingston wrote:
> 
> I've been trying without success to implement a VPN from my home ethernet
> LAN
> to my office Token Ring LAN by using PPP over SSH. I have a Linux box at
> both ends
> that are to act as the VPN conduits.

Interesting problem.  I'd like to know what you find out.  Some ideas:
- Include the exact error messages you get when something acts different
from how you want it,
- If you can run the pppds at either end with each pppd control terminal
set to that of the ssh endpoint process (or its child shell), you should
be able to establish the link.  Essentially, the ppp interface at each
end would be bound to the pseudo-terminal device, which ssh would then
route over the physical network interface that routes to the other
machine.  In theory as I understand it anyway.

HTH,
-TW

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AMAE)
Subject: Installing eth cards
Date: 30 Mar 1999 23:35:49 GMT

Hi,
I installed a second ethernet card on a linux microserver.  When I type
dmesg, I see that the Kernel is aware of and loaded the driver for that
ethernet card.  When I type ifconfig, there is nothing about eth1, that is
the second ethernet card I have installed!

Any ideas what I should do?

Also, how do I get the IP addresses for the router and hup?

Thanks      

--
Ayman Elsaedi
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: esac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: Newbie FTP Problem
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 18:10:14 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Stressed,

I had the same problem with my LAN a while back. I trashed all the windows
boxen, but if I remember correctly, I had to go into my ftp client software (on
the windows machines) and set firewall/proxy settings to passive or something
like that. I don't have any window clients to verify the exact settings at the
moment, but just fiddle with the proxy/firewall settings. it was PASSV or
passive, or something similar to that. Good luck, and remember, if you were to
just switch to all Linux, you wouldnt have to worry about such things anymore
;)

cheers,
esac
Stressed wrote:

> I have the typical Linux machine using IP masQ to connect my Windoze LAN to
> t.....yadda yadda yadda
>
> I have RHL 5.2 and it runs wu FTP (wu-2.4.2-academ[BETA-18-VR13]).
>
> Whenever I try to connect to a remote (Internet) FTP site from a Windoze
> machine, (going through the Linux masQ machine), I get the connection, but I
> get the following error and I'm unable to see, send or recieve data:
>
> ....yadda yadda yadda.....

--
"They that would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                        -Ben Franklin, 1759




------------------------------

From: Alfred Gebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.imap,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.sys.sgi.admin,comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: Help with company address book - LDAP?
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 09:56:29 +0200

Have a look at
http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-03/lw-03-uptime.html.
"Lightweight Directory Access Protocol: What it is, why you want it".

Summary
LDAP can do many, various, wonderful things. But in a lightweight installation
of
the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, perhaps its most useful feature for
the
harried sysadmin is that it helps prevent users from bugging you to ask about
other users' e-mail addresses. Mark Komarinski and Cary Collett lead the way.
(2,000 words)

Regards
Alfred




------------------------------

From: "andylow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: PPP !! ERROR
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 18:22:13 +1000

I had checked the interrupts but there is no proccess using my modem's IRQ.

Andy

andylow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

:     I'm facing this ppp problem, my dial up is working fine last time
until
: last night when I try connect to the net, I was put off by this error.

: Apr  1 10:58:22 spider kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
: Apr  1 10:58:22 spider kernel: registered device ppp0
: Apr  1 10:58:22 spider pppd[1118]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
: Apr  1 10:58:22 spider pppd[1118]: tcgetattr: Input/output error(5)
: Apr  1 10:58:23 spider pppd[1118]: Exit.

It means that some other process is using the modem's IRQ and preventing
pppd from getting the modem device file's ( /dev/ttySx, x = whatever )
attributes.  "cat /proc/interrupts" to find out what IRQs your devices
use.




--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                       Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP_allow help
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 08:24:50 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  "Mark Long" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm using RedHat 5.2 as a mail server.  I need the machine to accept (for
> relay) mail from just about anyone.  Any ideas?  is there something I can
> put in the IP_allow file to do this?
>
> Thanks in advance!
> -Mark
>

Here's my step-by-step...
http://linux.sparta.com/security/sendmail.html

Enjoy,
Bruce.
Bruce Benson, Senior Engineer,
SPARTA (CPD)
7926 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 900
McLean, VA  22102-3365
USA
+01 703-448-0210 x211
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://linux.sparta.com

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: RedHat Lousy Support
Date: 1 Apr 1999 10:31:35 +0200

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
D. C. Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>So what are the IDs for the two cards?  (IOW, have you told
>the system which is eth1 and which is eth0?)  Two identical
>NICs is quite a bit trickier than two NICs of different species.
>
>(Which is why all of my two-NIC systems have heterogenous NICs)



Also, at least one of the NICs must be configured with nonstandard 
IO address if they are otherwise identical, and some drivers might
not be too happy supporting more thatn one NIC anyway.


Definitin:  software support is something you'll get as long as you don't
ask for help. ;=)

Villy


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 15:30:14 +0800
From: Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Help ???

I have tried setting up a webserver using RH5.2. Everything seems to be
running fine except that i dont know how to setup the servername so that
pple can connect to my linux box (eg. 'www.adrian.com') I tried by
keying in the ip address using netscape and it works, but it fails when
i tried to key in 'www.adrian.com'

I am new to Linux and do not know much of the commands.
Can anyone teach me how to setup the server name ?
Do i have to make any changes to the httpd.conf file ?

Pls advice
Thanks

(ps:my email is [EMAIL PROTECTED])


------------------------------

From: Frank Corey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 5.2 PPP hell
Date: 1 Apr 1999 08:31:58 GMT

I've read about 6 How-To docs and tried everything I can think of. I can 
get minicom to work no problem. Occasionally I can get pppd to dial out but 
never a connection. I followed W.G. Unruh's howtoto the letter and to no 
avail. I've never had a problem like this before. I can echo ATDT and a 
phone # to the /dev/ttyS0 port and get it to dial and connect so I know I 
can reach the device. Tonight I got a message that the kernel lacks ppp 
support. I thought this was a module used when needed but now I wonder... 
The modem is question is an external USRobotics Sportster 56K X2 faxmodem. 
Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks.

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Desmond Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 01 Apr 1999 10:32:45 +0200


[snip]

What about characters from 'The Lord of the Rings' ..?

gandalf ... frodo ... sauron ... legolas ...

Guess who's gonna be changing his /etc/hosts this afternoon ...  :-)

-- 
Desmond Coughlan                |Restez zen ... Linux peut le faire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www site under construction]
                                

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to