Linux-Networking Digest #723, Volume #10          Fri, 2 Apr 99 21:14:15 EST

Contents:
  Re: IP forwarding situation ("Curt")
  Re: SLOW Telnet???? (mist)
  Re: I have problems with DNS and pppd (Marc Hering)
  DHCP and IP-Masquerade (Yue Huang)
  Re: IPFWADM (Dave Koberstein)
  Re: RedHat Lousy Support ("D. C. Sessions")
  Re: MS-LINUX (KilgoreTrout)
  Re: telnetd source? (David Rees)
  Re: What is the best Linux to install? ("Paul Bary")
  Re: 3c509B and 3c905B in same box (Larry Benoit)
  Re: HELP: My users have problems logging on... (Bill Unruh)
  Re: Replacing Notes with IMAP ("Anthony W. Youngman")
  ADSL ethernet with Dynamic IP (Colin Doncaster)
  Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network? (Eugene 
VonNiederhausern)
  Re: Can't get netatalk-1.4b2 compiled on RH5.2 and gcc 2.7.2.3 (Rod Smith)
  Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ("Wesley W. Garland")
  SAMBA Can't Connect to NT Network Drive (Bob Flumere)
  Re: What is the best Linux to install? (Mike Graham)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding situation
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 05:04:29 -0500

If you turn on forwarding without IP masqurading it won't be a firewall
anymore, it will be a router.
I assume since they are trusted domain this is ok.

Look at /etc/sysconfig/network.  Look for :

FORWARD_IPV4=yes

If it's not there then add it.  You may also need to add the routes to your
route table.

If it is a Linux firewall, fowarding may already be on.   You may need to
turn off IP masquarading.


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7e0pa7$tv8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi! Here's my network config...
>
>
>    Company workstations
>        |
>        |                  +--------+                              (    )
>  +~~~~~~~~~~~~+       eth1| LINUX  |         +~~~~~~~~~~~~+      (      )
>  |NT 4 Domain1|<--------->|REDHAT  |<------->|NT 4 Domain2|---->(Internet)
>  +~~~~~~~~~~~~+           |FIREWALL|eth0     +~~~~~~~~~~~~+      (      )
>                           +--------+                              (    )
>
>2 NT domains with a Linux RedHat firewall in between.
>I'm an NT Admin who walked into this situation with no knowledge of Linux.
>What I need: Employees from Domain1 need to be able to access files and
shares
>in Domain2. These two domains can be set up as trusts. Also, users dialing
in
>to a server equipped with RAS in Domain2 need to be validated to access
files
>and shares in Domain1.
>
>I know it's probably a simple operation, but I'm a Linux newbie, and any
help
>would be greatly appreciated. I've been told that what I need to do here is
IP
>forwarding. Is that true, and if so, how?
>
>Thanks in advance...
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own



------------------------------

From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SLOW Telnet????
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 11:00:33 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Tony s <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>My Linux box and w95 system are linked using ethernet cards, problem,
> I can
>telnet but the speed is way to slow, not only that but it disconnects
> after
>around 60 sec.

If it's the *initial* connection that is slow, then that can normally be
resolved by adding the IP address for the windows box in /etc/hosts on
the Linux machine.

>
>ping shows a speed of 1000+ms any ideas out there?
>

However, that sounds slow and suggests maybe a connection problem.  If
the Linux box also has a dos/windows partition, what sort of response
does ping give from that?  Are the cards/cable definitely good?
-- 
Mist.

------------------------------

From: Marc Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: I have problems with DNS and pppd
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 21:08:59 GMT

www.worldvisions.ca/wvdial

DL wvdial,,its free and makes connecting to the interent EASY!!!



Ernesto Miralles wrote:
> =

> I connect with my pppd ( is 2.3.6 under kernel 2.2.5 and slackware 3.6 =
)
> but it gives me like primary DNS 0.0.0.0 and secondary DNS 0.0.0.0 =BF =
why
> ?, I don't understood.
> I have to run Windows for connect to internet.
> my resolv.conf is Ok
>         domain arrakis.es
>         nameserver x.x.x.x
>         nameserver x.x.x.x
> =

> I don't kown to do, helpme with email too, find a new is very dificult
> for me
> Thanks in advance
> =

> note: I don't worry if you decided explain a lot of.
> =

> --
> _______________________________________________________________________=
_
> =

> Ernesto Miralles Chiva
> =

> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: Yue Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP and IP-Masquerade
Date: 3 Apr 1999 01:08:11 GMT

I used to run four Linux/Win95/NT/MAC boxes in a network using TCP/IP. 
One linux box has IP-Masquerade, is DNS and connected to the internet with PPP
over a phone line.  Everything worked well.  Now I replaced the phone modem
with a cable modem and connected to the internet with DHCPcd. The network
does not work any more.

If I do not start dhcpcd, networking is OK.  Once dhcpcd starts, the IP and
name of the linux box are changed.  It can not access any other machine in
the network, and other machines cannot connect it either.

I setup another machine as DNS, but cannot solve the problem.  Again, once
dhcpcd starts, this machine is isolated from the network.

How can I use the DHCP box as a gateway to the internet for the network?
Please help.

Thank you for any help.

yue

------------------------------

From: Dave Koberstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPFWADM
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 20:55:07 GMT

Use something like this:

/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a accept -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D 0.0.0.0/0 6112

Can't say I've tried it.

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  Nick Farley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know how to enable forwarding of UDP packets on port 6112?
>
>

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: "D. C. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat Lousy Support
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 11:31:11 -0700

Villy Kruse wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> D. C. Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >So what are the IDs for the two cards?  (IOW, have you told
> >the system which is eth1 and which is eth0?)  Two identical
> >NICs is quite a bit trickier than two NICs of different species.
> >
> >(Which is why all of my two-NIC systems have heterogenous NICs)
> 
> Also, at least one of the NICs must be configured with nonstandard
> IO address if they are otherwise identical, and some drivers might
> not be too happy supporting more thatn one NIC anyway.

For halfway recent cards (read PCI) the address overlap is taken
care of.  (Would you REALLY want to put a NIC on ISA?  Get real!)
The interrupt sharing is either a really good or a really bad
idea, since some drivers actually work best with all of the devices
on a common interrupt and some fail utterly.

The main subtlety is that the driver needs to match each NIC
uniquely to the eth? identifier, and the standard way to do
that is to use the GUID.  Every Ethernet card MUST have a unique
48-bit identifier, usually put in a ROM on the card.  If you watch
your system come up the NIC driver will announce the ID as it
detects the card.  Boot twice -- once with each card -- and record
the ID for each.  (Or, you may be able to get it from /proc/pci)

Then edit the /etc/conf.modules to attach the GUID to the /dev/eth?

-- 
D. C. Sessions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 01:15:46 -0500
From: KilgoreTrout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: MS-LINUX

happy april fools

Jody Walker wrote:

> I see Bill is still trying to take over the world.  Silly Silly Bill you
> shouldn't mess with things you don't understand.  If I want an OS that
> crashes every five minutes then I will come to you.
>
> TURBO1010 wrote:
>
> > hought you might like an early peek at this. It'll be going out over
> > the wire shortly.
> >
> > Microsoft Announces MS-Linux
> >
> > The flexible "grassroots" operating system, now with the quality and
> > enterprise-level service and support customers expect from Microsoft
> >
> > REDMOND, Wash., April 1 /PRNewswire/ -- Microsoft Corp. today announced
> > the forthcoming release of MS-Linux(R), a new version of the well-known
> > Linux(R) operating system designed for the enterprise.
> >
> > "Prior to the development of MS-Linux, enterprise customers wouldn't
> > dream of deploying mission-critical applications on an unsupported
> > operating
> > system," said Jim Allchin, senior vice president of Microsoft's personal
> > and
> > business systems group. "All that has now changed."
> >
> > Maximum compatibility and performance
> >
> > While other versions of Linux offer a variety of immature and largely
> > incompatible windowing environments, MS-Linux includes an implementation
> > of
> > the familiar Microsoft(R) Windows(R) desktop, minimizing corporate
> > training
> > costs and allowing the hundreds of millions of Windows users worldwide
> > to be
> > productive right away.
> >
> > MS-Linux provides a complete implementation of the Win32(R) API,
> > enabling many of the thousands of applications written for the Microsoft
> > Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows NT(R), and Windows 2000 operating
> > systems to
> > run unchanged on MS-Linux. Microsoft will offer support for future
> > releases
> > of the Microsoft Office suite of productivity applications and the
> > BackOffice family of server products running on MS-Linux. In addition,
> > many
> > existing MS-DOS(R) and SCO Unix programs will run on MS-Linux without
> > modification. Benchmark tests performed by independent laboratories have
> > shown that MS-Linux is the world's fastest Windows file server.
> >
> > A groundswell of support from industry
> >
> > A number of leading development tool vendors will announce support for
> > MS-Linux, including Bristol Technology Inc., Compuware Corp., Cygnus
> > Solutions, Fujitsu Microelectronics Inc., Intel Corp., Metrowerks Inc.,
> > Rational Software Corp., Sybase Inc., and Tower Technology.
> >
> > "The new Linux distribution from Microsoft gives the operating system
> > the credibility it needs to gain a foothold in organizations where it
> > has
> > never gone before," said Jon Hall, Executive Director of Linux
> > International, a non-profit Linux advocacy organization. Microsoft will
> > become a corporate member of Linux International, and will make a
> > substantial donation of funds and equipment to the organization. "Linux
> > International looks forward to working with Microsoft for the benefit of
> > current and future Linux users," added Hall.
> >
> > According to VA Research President and CEO Larry Augustin, "VA Research
> > is delighted that Microsoft is entering the fast-growing market for
> > computers powered by Linux." VA Research has announced plans to bundle
> > MS-Linux and selected Microsoft Office and BackOffice products with its
> > powerful server, workstation, and laptop computers. VA Research has also
> > agreed to make Microsoft its exclusive supplier of Linux-based operating
> > systems going forward. "Having the Office and BackOffice suites running
> > on
> > computers from VA Research will give us a huge advantage in the
> > marketplace," said Augustin.
> >
> > Microsoft has engaged well-known author and programmer Eric S. Raymond
> > to advise the company on certain intellectual property issues related to
> > Linux. Raymond's paper "The Cathedral of the Bizarre" was a key factor
> > in
> > Microsoft's decision to develop a Linux product. "While Microsoft will
> > not
> > immediately release the source code for its version of Linux, the
> > company
> > has promised to do so eventually," said Raymond. "That's good enough for
> > me."
> >
> > "The Linux community and Microsoft are a great fit," says Linus
> > Torvalds, creator of Linux. "After all, we both have the same goal,
> > which is
> > total world domination."
> >
> > Separately, Microsoft has announced the opening of a new recruiting
> > center in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. "Microsoft is always
> > looking for talented individuals to join our team," said Mike Murray,
> > Microsoft's vice president of human resources and administration. "We
> > often
> > recruit in communities that are expected to have significant numbers of
> > folks looking for work in the near future."
> >
> > Pricing and availability
> >
> > Microsoft expects to release English and international versions of
> > MS-Linux Version 3.1 for Intel- and RISC-based computers on or before
> > April
> > 1, 2000. Pricing has not been announced.
> >
> > About Microsoft
> > Founded in 1975, Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is the worldwide leader in
> > software for personal computers. The company offers a wide range of
> > products
> > and services, each designed with the mission of making it easier and
> > more
> > enjoyable to take advantage of people using personal computers every
> > day.
> >
> > Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, Win32, BackOffice, MS-Linux, and Linux
> > are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Microsoft Corp. in the
> > United States and/or other countries. Other product and company names
> > herein
> > may be trademarks of their respective owners.
> >   Happy Surfing,




------------------------------

From: David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: telnetd source?
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 17:37:27 -0800

Jonas Anden wrote:
> 
> Anyone got a pointer to a telnetd source that will easily compile under
> RedHat 5.2? I'm looking to create a chroot()ed version of the telnet server.
> so that I can easily limit the software that may be used when telnetting in
> to my servers.
> 
>   // Judge

You want the SRPM.  Look for telnet-0.10-5.src.rpm.  In future, you can
find this out for your self.  Here's how I did it on my redhat system:

forty:~> rpm -qf /usr/sbin/in.telnetd 
telnet-0.10-5
forty:~> 

See the man page for rpm for more details.

-Dave

------------------------------

From: "Paul Bary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: What is the best Linux to install?
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 05:54:49 -0700

Gotta agree...Mandrake is terrific...all the advantages of RH 5.2 plus the
lastest release version of KDE...I
couldn't be more tickled....I got mine from CheapBytes...1.99 and off you
go...

Paul
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7duacm$7uk8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Graham Daniell  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | RedHat - the boxed set - by far the easiest to install.
>
> Haven't tried Mandrake, have you?
>
> --
>   bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
> What I find astonishing is not that my cat has started to sing, but that
> he has taken up country-western. This morning he sang `Momma, don't let
> your kittens grow up to be barn cats' in the shower, followed by a
> pretty decent yodeling version of `Roundup time in Texas when the catnip
> is in bloom.'
>



------------------------------

From: Larry Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c509B and 3c905B in same box
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 20:40:16 -0500

Chip Roberson wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I just installed Linux a few days ago in my Dell with the 3Com
> 3c509B-TPO (ISA) card.  Everything
> worked well.  Today, I installed a second nic, a 3Com 3c905B-TX (PCI).
> I just learned that this is
> not a "Tier 1 supported hardware" device according to RedHat.  (Why?)
>
> There is no specific module for the 3c905B in the kerneld configurator,
> so I have a few questions.
>
> 1) Will the 509 and 905 use the same driver?  I don't think so, but want
> to double check.
>
> 2) If so, will I have to recompile the kernel?  Why, and what would I
> have to do to make sure the
> NICs are supported properly?
>
> 3) If not, where do I get the driver module for the 905?  Does the
> 3c59x.c driver at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
> support the
> 905B?  I wasn't sure if that one driver supports all the NICs.
>
> 4) Where can I find steps to installing the new driver?
>
> Thanks,
>  Chip
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   Chip Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Linux Administrator
>   Home
>   Office
>
>   Chip Roberson
>   Linux Administrator  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   Home
>   Office
>   Petaluma             Netscape Conference Address
>   CA
>   USA
>   Additional Information:
>   Last Name    Roberson
>   First Name   Chip
>   Version      2.1

For what it is worth, I have a Dell XPS R450 running Redhat 5.2 with a 3c509B
and 3c905B-TX Before setting up the
cards, I upgraded to the 2.0.36 kernel which has improved support for the
3c905B-TX.  I turned off PNP for the 3c509B,  using the 3Com utility that is
included with the driver disks.

You should be able to setup the cards in /etc/conf.modules as follows:

alias eth0 3c59x
alias eth1 3c509


This configuration assumes you are using the default irq and memory.  I am
not sure whether autodetection might affect the order by which the kernel
recognizes and configures eth0 and eth1 -- but that this setup works, loading
the 3c905B-TX first on eth0.  Also, note that a different driver is specified
for each card -- the 3c509B uses the 3c509 driver and the 3c905B-TX uses the
3c59x driver.  My actual setup is a little different because I have
configured the 3c509B to use irq 5.  Of course, you also need to configure
the IP address, routing, DNS, etc. for each interface using Redhat Control
Panel or by editing configuration files directly.

Also, see this HOWTO for detailed help:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/multicard.html


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: HELP: My users have problems logging on...
Date: 3 Apr 1999 01:42:10 GMT

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> connecting, he gets a message "serial line is looped back". He only

It sounds to me like the modem has local echo turned on. This can
totally mess things up.
Send the command to turn off local echo in the init string to the
modem.
(ATE0).

>>

>If the modem has a AT&W feature that works, you can use it to save the
>new settings.

I would much much rather use AT&F and then a specific required series of
commands, than to use AT&W and then ATZ That is far too prone to
breaking and for you to forgetting what exactly it was you set in the
modem memory.


>Otherwise, you must add an AT string to the /etc/inittab serial lines
>after the mgetty.  Do `man mgetty` for more info.

>Secondly,  you should be using mgetty (in /etc/inittab)and not getty to
>answer the calls.  `getty' does not work well with modems/serial lines.


Definitely Strongly Unconditionally Enthusiatically agree. Use mgetty if
you are not. Again, use mgetty if you are not. (and if you are, keep
using it.)
>Download a copy of mgetty from somewhere if you do not have it on your system.

http://www.leo.org/~doering/mgetty/



------------------------------

From: "Anthony W. Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: Replacing Notes with IMAP
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 15:59:38 +0100
Reply-To: "Anthony W. Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Frederic Faure
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On 29 Mar 1999 20:55:26 GMT, Mark Turner
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>IMAP can do this. And Notes can talk to IMAP clients, too.
>>Be sure to update to the latest IMAP. The less-than-recent ones
>>had notorious security holes.
>
>Thanks for confirming what I found in a couple of FAQs. I didn't find
>how to work with imapd, though, and how to set up clients such as
>Eudora. Anything on the Net or in print?
>
If you've only got the lite version, buy Eudora Pro and print off the
manual. It's all there - there are two (big :-( .pdf documents about 100
pages each. A user manual and a tech manual.
-- 
Anthony W. Youngman - wol at thewolery dot demon dot co dot uk
Trousers with a single hole in their waistband are topologically equivalent
to a doughnut. These sugarcoated trousers have yet to catch on at fast-food
outlets! (SuperStrings by F. David Peat)

If replying by e-mail please mail wol. Anything else may get missed amongst
the spam.


------------------------------

From: Colin Doncaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ADSL ethernet with Dynamic IP
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 19:16:43 GMT


  I have a D-Link DE-528 ethernet card using an ADSL modem.  Whenever I
turn my computer on I get a new ip address.  How do I set up linux to
use my ADSL modem for network connection.  All of the ethernet
configuration scripts as for an ip address and I can give them one
because it changes every time.

  Thanks, Colin.

-- 
Colin Doncaster 
Animator and Technical Director
bEnT Animation
http://www.bentanimation.com

- Just Say No To NURBS -

------------------------------

From: Eugene VonNiederhausern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network?
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 20:12:25 -0600

Timothy Litwiller wrote:

> yes, please send an URL
>
> Eugene VonNiederhausern wrote:
>
> > Cyrus Mehta wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am creating a dual Windows/Linux environment using Samba for file serving
> > > on a standard Ethernet network.  I was wondering what kind of X server software
> > > for the Windows side I could use to run some X windows apps off of the LInux Box.
> > >
> > > Reliability is the most important factor, windows will crash often enough without
> > > the help of the X server.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > CKM
> >
> > Yesterday, I found the best X server/viewer for windows  (and linux) that I have
> > seen yet and it is free (GNU Public License). It  is called VNC from Olivetti and
> > Oracle research laboratory. You can connect from linux->windows, windows->linux,
> > linux->linux, windows->windows. It is a lot better than any of the other products
> > I have seen ot this kind. I don't  have the URL (it is at work) you can email  me 
>or
> > post a reply and I will get it and reply.

The URL is  http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/  . Let me know what you think...


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rod Smith)
Subject: Re: Can't get netatalk-1.4b2 compiled on RH5.2 and gcc 2.7.2.3
Date: 1 Apr 1999 12:45:16 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Posted and mailed]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Wouter Boussemaere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> ps.: but then i'm stuck in the linking
...
> auth.o(.text+0x541): undefined reference to `crypt'

I've gotten this in other programs (XISP, I believe).  IIRC, the solution
is simply to include the -lcrypt parameter to your linking command line
(say by adding it to a LIBS line in your Makefile).  The libcrypt library,
on my Red Hat 5.2 system, is part of the glibc package.

-- 
Rod Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.channel1.com/users/rodsmith
NOTE: Remove the "uce" word from my address to mail me

------------------------------

From: "Wesley W. Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 21:05:07 -0500

>> What about characters from 'The Lord of the Rings' ..?
>>
>> gandalf ... frodo ... sauron ... legolas ...
>>
>> Guess who's gonna be changing his /etc/hosts this afternoon ...� :-)
>>
>> --
>> Desmond Coughlan��������������� |Restez zen ... Linux peut le faire
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [www site under construction]
>
>Certainly better than from "Lord of the Flies"... <grin>


I dunno.. I think "piggy" and "bigcrushingrock" would make
hilarious computer names.

Cheers,
Wes

--
Wesley W. Garland���������������� | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]���
Director, Product Development���� | Pager: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PageMail, Inc.������������������� |
Kingston, ON Canada�������������� | Voice: (888) 247 6246




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Flumere)
Subject: SAMBA Can't Connect to NT Network Drive
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 14:31:52 GMT

Hello all!

Well, here I am, playing with Red Hat...

I'm attempting to mount a shared NTFS folder on a Linux Box:

The NT Box with the share is named DEC2,  (192.168.0.3) and is a
member of the Workgroup "FOXCO"

The NT Share, (visible on other NT boxes on the network), is named
"Util" and has permissions granted to "Everyone"

The Linux Box is named LINUX,  (192.168.0.10)

They can ping each other and HTTP from LINUX to DEC2 works, so we are
clearly connected.

I have created the destination directory of "/mnt/dec2_windows" on
LINUX

In /etc/smb.conf, I have set the Workgroup as FOXCO and un-commented
the line.

I type "smbmount  //DEC2/Util  /mnt/dec2_windows -n" (No quotes, of
course!)

Smbmount returns "mount error: Invalid Argument"

I've typed it in all different cases.  (for the last two hours <G>)

The HOSTS file on LINUX:  

127.0.0.1               Localhost
192.168.0.10    LINUX
192.168.0.3     DEC2

There is no Fully Qualified Domain name.. (is this my problem??)

Thanks for any help/comments..

Bob Flumere
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Graham)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: What is the best Linux to install?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 14:31:07 GMT

On Fri, 2 Apr 1999 05:54:49 -0700, Paul Bary wrote:
>Gotta agree...Mandrake is terrific...all the advantages of RH 5.2 plus the
>lastest release version of KDE...I
>couldn't be more tickled....I got mine from CheapBytes...1.99 and off you
>go...

  What is the latest version of KDE?  When you look for
distribution-specific packages they tend to be relatively old.  For instance, I
think the latest RedHat RPMs of KDE are 1.1-3, whereas you can get 'generic'
KDE parts in 1.1-6 or so.

-- 
Mike Graham, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caledon, Ontario, Canada (just NW of Toronto).

Raiser of animals.  Weldor of metals.  Driver of off-road vehicles.
Writer of FAQs.  Keeper of the faith, and all around okay guy.

<http://www.beeline.ca/personal/mike>

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to