Linux-Networking Digest #756, Volume #9 Sat, 2 Jan 99 15:13:41 EST
Contents:
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!! (DG)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!! (DG)
Re: NE2000 driver problem. What's wrong here? (Kaz Morishita)
Re: Look in here!! [pppd] (Clifford Kite)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but am
stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!! (DG)
Re: 3C589D in RH 5.2? ("William Borland")
Network Card Sustained Data Transfer Rate? (Mr. Robert A. Beyne)
Re: ppp: getting strange AT stuff from peer? (SOLVED) (Andrew Duchowski)
Re: NT 4 and network problems - contd (JunkDTectr)
Re: Unsuccessful connection to EarthLink, please help!!! (Clifford Kite)
Okay, this is a tough one, using NT PDC for logins into my Linux box ("Cherokee
Health Systems")
Re: linux network problem, linksys ethernet cards
Re: setting up virtual host (Dale Miracle)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DG)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home
but am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 19:22:36 GMT
Shut up fartbrain. I'll stay if I feel like it. Nobody has to tell
nobody to leave. I can do all the name-calling and insulting and
shouting if I want to fartbrain. Besides, I not only see it as fun but
I see it as a duty.
On 2 Jan 1999 18:13:14 GMT, Wisquatuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I apologize for simply adding another post to this needlessly
>cross-posted drawn-out thread, but I'm hoping that this one will be
>one of the last, once these few points are clarified.
>
>In comp.os.linux.networking DG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You dumb f***. The @home service does not support operating systems
>> other than Win95/98.
>
>They shouldn't need to -- you can get decent advice from Linux
>newsgroups, if you bother to ask nicely.
>
>> I read the f****** manual but no help. Your f****** 3-yr old kid is
>> mentally retarded just like you you f****** pr***.
>
>Assuming this statement is even true, you're saying that a child, who
>has been deemed smarter than you (which is not hard to believe), is
>mentally retarded. If you really meant to say this, doesn't it then
>say a lot about *you*?
>
No way man. Unless you are associated with that dumbf***, you would
know nothing about that 3yr old sh**. The fact that I am calling the
kid mentally retarded only says dumbf**** sych as yourself do not
compare us to kids.
>> I don't have to pay sh** if I don't want to. Now get the f*** outta
>> here !!!
>
>Well, actually, I believe those two statements don't work too well
>together. If you feel you don't have to pay, and people here are
>suggesting that you *do*, then the obvious conclusion is not for all
>those people to leave, but for *you* to leave.
>
I DON'T HAVE TO LEAVE. NOBODY'S MAKING A SUGGESTION THAT I LEAVE.
MAYBE YOU AND ALL THOSE OTHER DUMB A******* WOULD LIKE TO SUGGEST THAT
I PAY SH** FOR IT BUT THEY THEMSELVES AREN'T. THEY GET IT FOR FREE !!!
>Quite seriously, you've worn out your welcome. Nobody is going to
>help you now -- most have forgotten your original problem, and aren't
>all that inclined to go back and look it up. If you're pissed off
>about the warm welcome you *didn't* get when you signed on to the net
>(for example, the people framing your account and making you switch
>ISPs), stop, look at your behaviour, and try to figure out why.
>
The fact that I switched ISPs has nothing to do with my behavior. What
the f*** are you trying to connect anyway.
>I'm not saying you're stupid. You've inadvertently said many things
>to that effect already, and whether they are true or not is not my
>place to judge. I'll simply say that I think your level of maturity
>leaves a lot to be desired, and that you should clean up your act or
>leave until adolescence cleans it up for you.
>
YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO, DIPS*** !!! I'LL MAKE SURE I CAN GET
SOME TECH SUPPORT EVEN IF I HAVE TO BE AN A****** !!!
>Not getting the tech support you need is not the end of the world.
>Try looking at http://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/ for your
>answers, as I don't believe HOWTO documents care one way or the other
>how much you yell and curse at them. If that fails, come back when
>you're ready to act in a civil manner.
>
>--
>Wisquatuk (myname[1..4]@netrover.com to e-mail)
GET THE F*** OUTTA HERE AND DON'T YOU COME BACK OR ELSE I WILL KICK
YOUR SORRY LITTLE A** !!!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DG)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home
but am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 19:26:15 GMT
I also forgot to mention one thing. If you think you're an ethics
preacher that you think you can give some piece of s*** advice,
here's my advice in return, BUTT OUT !!!
On 2 Jan 1999 18:13:14 GMT, Wisquatuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I apologize for simply adding another post to this needlessly
>cross-posted drawn-out thread, but I'm hoping that this one will be
>one of the last, once these few points are clarified.
>
>In comp.os.linux.networking DG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You dumb f***. The @home service does not support operating systems
>> other than Win95/98.
>
>They shouldn't need to -- you can get decent advice from Linux
>newsgroups, if you bother to ask nicely.
>
>> I read the f****** manual but no help. Your f****** 3-yr old kid is
>> mentally retarded just like you you f****** pr***.
>
>Assuming this statement is even true, you're saying that a child, who
>has been deemed smarter than you (which is not hard to believe), is
>mentally retarded. If you really meant to say this, doesn't it then
>say a lot about *you*?
>
>> I don't have to pay sh** if I don't want to. Now get the f*** outta
>> here !!!
>
>Well, actually, I believe those two statements don't work too well
>together. If you feel you don't have to pay, and people here are
>suggesting that you *do*, then the obvious conclusion is not for all
>those people to leave, but for *you* to leave.
>
>Quite seriously, you've worn out your welcome. Nobody is going to
>help you now -- most have forgotten your original problem, and aren't
>all that inclined to go back and look it up. If you're pissed off
>about the warm welcome you *didn't* get when you signed on to the net
>(for example, the people framing your account and making you switch
>ISPs), stop, look at your behaviour, and try to figure out why.
>
>I'm not saying you're stupid. You've inadvertently said many things
>to that effect already, and whether they are true or not is not my
>place to judge. I'll simply say that I think your level of maturity
>leaves a lot to be desired, and that you should clean up your act or
>leave until adolescence cleans it up for you.
>
>Not getting the tech support you need is not the end of the world.
>Try looking at http://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/ for your
>answers, as I don't believe HOWTO documents care one way or the other
>how much you yell and curse at them. If that fails, come back when
>you're ready to act in a civil manner.
>
>--
>Wisquatuk (myname[1..4]@netrover.com to e-mail)
------------------------------
From: Kaz Morishita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NE2000 driver problem. What's wrong here?
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 09:56:15 -0800
Type 'insmod 8390;insmod ne'
On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Alan D. Wilcox wrote:
> I'm installing ne.o into Linux 2.0.36 (Red Hat 5.2), and
> getting strange response ... (other modules load OK)
>
> root:/etc> insmod -p -v ne io=0x300 irq=10
> /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol ei_open
> /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol ethdev_init
> /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol ei_debug
> /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol ei_interrupt
> /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol NS8390_init
> /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: unresolved symbol ei_close
> root:/etc>
>
> Am I overlooking something here? Or was ne.o built incorrectly
> before it was distributed?
>
> How to fix?
>
> Thanks for the help!
> Alan
>
>
`Kaz' (Kazuhiko Morishita)
==================================================
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
721 Davis Hall - SEMM
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
Berkeley, CA, 94720-1710
U.S.A.
==================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Look in here!! [pppd]
Date: 2 Jan 1999 11:57:40 -0600
Dieter Vervaeke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I run pppd in the easiest way, with the files /etc/resolv.conf and
: /etc/ppp/options, thats all i use!
: i connect trough minicom and then run pppd, i get those weird signs(what is
<snip>
: and the error message is:
<snip>
: Dec 30 13:31:32 localhost pppd[327]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
: Dec 30 13:31:32 localhost pppd[327]: Connection terminated.
: Dec 30 13:31:32 localhost pppd[327]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
: Dec 30 13:31:32 localhost pppd[327]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
: Dec 30 13:31:32 localhost pppd[327]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
: Dec 30 13:31:32 localhost pppd[327]: Exit.
Without question this is the most frequently asked question relating
to PPP. There is a section on it in the PPP-HOWTO, search for
"not 8 bit clean".
You _should_ be doing PPP right, which is to say: configure pppd with
chat to make the connection.
Another thing is that the kernel level PPP support you show is 2.3.3
which suggests you might be running a 2.1.x kernel. I would strongly
recommend getting ppp-2.3.5 in that case.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DG)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home but
am stuck in the DUNGEONS OF DOOM !!! SO HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELP !!!
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 19:28:15 GMT
Why don't you pay me $300 first and then I'll follow your crappy
advice.
On Wed, 30 Dec 1998 22:22:58 -0500, "umm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Welp you could fork out the $14 for the RedHat
>CD-ROM at your local computer store but that kinda
>nullifies the value of RedHat being freeware.
>
>Unless you have 2 hard drives I think you will
>have to partition your hard drive to have at least
>2 partitions one could be 32bit but the other
>should be split into a RedHat native and a RedHat
>swap partition.
>
>
>Probably the easiest way for you to install on a
>2 disk system is to have 2 partitions on the
>first drive with the downloaded files on the
>second partition
>
>c:\ = 32bit
>logical drive of HD1 d:\ is 16 bit and contains the RedHat
>
>then on HD2
>
>fdisk and format it and scan disk it
>
>Then use your boot floppies to install RedHat on
>Physical drive 2
>from Physical drive 1 logical drive D:\RedHat\
>
>
>
>I am almost at the point that I think RedHat is
>becoming useless. The development is getting
>pretty far behind on support for current Hardware
>
>Its getting to the point that you really have to plan
>on purchasing a system that will do only Linux.
>
>There are no 56k PCI modems for Linux
>AGP is poorly supported
>No USB and
>X will fry your monitor
>
>I mean what use is it
>
>If your running a home system there are tons
>of free daemons and software for Windows that
>will work just fine and install in a matter of minutes.
>
>
>I mean I just think its time for Eric Raymond
>to come to grips that he is totally wrong.
>
>
>Linux or any Unix system may be fine for an
>a speciality application, Intranet Mail Server or
>even a web server but it doesn't even come close to
>being a system that you can install on your desktop.
>Let alone a system that you can share with the family
>let kids play games and learn and mom and dad can
>do a little work at home.
>I would rather use dos 2.0 with Gem.
>
>Linux is not free you really need to buy it on CD-ROM.
>Then you need hardware that will support Linux.
>Then you need a manual and months of training
>to be able to really understand and perform the
>configuration correctly and fully.
>
>Sure you could probably get it to boot in a full day of work
>including partitioning re-configuration of PnP Hardware
>hunting down Video signal specs.
>
>Then when you do what is it good for ?
>
>You can chat on IRC all day run some Warez FTP servers
>or spoof some mail.
>
>
>If Sun, Linux, SCO, BSD, AIX were so great
>Microsoft would be suing them I guess
>
>And such is proof that it will really be a BE OS
>or some similar thing that will be Microsoft's demise
>20 years from now.
>
>
>The time has come to forget all this BS and start
>becoming productive with tools that are available
>and useable.
>
>If you waste a day or a week or a few hours a
>day or week and you continuously need to read arcane
>manuals on sendmail and write scripts and use perl
>to manage a system that is basically a headache and doesn't
>support your needed hardware or software
>then what is the real price.
>
>
>I guess its like an old car
>you can buy one and make it work well
>but if you need a part or technical info you have
>to spend a long time hunting it down.
>If you can't find what you need you have to
>make the part which means a large investment in time.
>And Time = Money.
>Most of all there is no dealer to get your money back from.
>
>
>Just writing this news post I could have written
>an article for my website which would have been
>another 2 pages that could have banners on them
>making me money.
>
>
>Honestly from now on I am gonna point my friends
>towards Windows and "enemas" towards Linux.
>
>
>Then again Ill make you a deal
>If Clinton is thrown out of office I will devote 1 day a week
>to providing help to New Linux users.
>
>Its all about reality I guess its just time to wake up
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>THE DUNGEONS OF DOOOOOOOOOOM wrote in message <368ac28d.9690894@news>...
>>Hi. i do apologize if my message sounds a bit too long but at least
>>you all will be able to figure out the sticky problem I'm stuck with
>>and may even know how to help me out of it. I currently am running
>>Windows 98 on one hard disk. However, since it is 7.5 GB and it's
>>32-bit, Linux won't recognize it when I first install Linux. At least
>>that's what I have been told and eventually found out. Besides, sure I
>>can download 500 MB in 2 hrs without any trouble via my cable modem,
>>but I would still need to copy it to a CD-R or CD-RW disc or something
>>and I'm not gonna pay $200 - $400 for CD-R/RW (in case you all wanted
>>to know why I would not prefer to copy to a storage device and then
>>install). I'm not sure if Linux will do it off my zip disks if I copy
>>linux to 6 zip discs. In any case, these wonderful people keep on
>>changing the versions of RH Linux. Therefore having got fed up with
>>it, I looked in the book which talked about RH Linux and how to
>>install. Well, I had versions 3 and 4 of RH but since some of my
>>crucial hardware at that time could not be recognized I abandoned RH
>>until I finally found out that if I had a direct connection with
>>Cox@home just like corporations and universities that have a direct
>>connection with their T1, T3, OC-3, etc... server, then you don't even
>>have to download RH linux. All you really have to download are the
>>boot.img and supp.img files and transfer them to two blank but
>>formatted 3.5" high density disks. So I did just that and booted up my
>>machine and when I got to the installation method option, I chose ftp
>>method. When I got to the ethernet card question, I 3c509 driver. By
>>the way, I still have the 3c509b PnP 16-bit Ethernet adaptor which I
>>obtained when I used to attend another university. Rather than sell
>>it, I kept it for something like a cable modem. In fact that same
>>ethernet card I had was part of the requirements for my cable modem
>>installation. Anyway, RH Linux never in the past had any trouble
>>recognizing my ethernet card. The only trouble was recognizing my
>>video cards,my parallel port zip drive, and my higher capacity hard
>>drive. here, in 5.2 that was not the problem. however, when I got to
>>the options of DHCP, BOOTP, and Static Address, I chose the Static
>>option and filled in my fields correctly. However, I got an error
>>message saying unable to connect to host. I fully verified the ftp
>>site address and typed it correctly. So I then went back and tried the
>>other two options only to get the "no response" error message from
>>bootp and dhcp. So the question still remains, isn't it possible to
>>install via ftp with cox@home and if so, how and what configurations
>>are to be made during installation?
>>
>>P.S:
>>PLEASE DO NO TELL ME TO USE ANOTHER VERSION OF UNIX SINCE I KINDA AM
>>USED TO RH LINUX. ALSO, PLEASE DO NOT TELL ME HOW TO PARTITION MY HARD
>>DRIVE SINCE MY 75. GB HARD DRIVE IS NEARLY FILLED UP. I PLAN TO
>>INSTALL REDHAT LINUX 5.2 TO MY OLDER 730 MB HARD DRIVE SO PLEASE DO
>>NOT BRING IN 7.5 GB INTO THE PICTURE UNLESS YOU ARE GONNA GIVE ME A
>>FREE CD-RW DRIVE FIRST !!! ALL I AM ASKING IS THAT YOU GIVE ME A
>>SOLUTION FOR THE PROBLEM I GOT. DO NOT GIVE ME IRRELEVANT BULLSH**
>>SUCH AS TELLING ME TO PARTITION MY OTHER HARD DRIVE. I WILL CONTINUE
>>TO POST THIS MESSAGE UNTIL SOMEONE HELPS ME FIX THIS PROBLEM !!!
>>
>>Please post a reply to this message. I've had to switch ISPs in the
>>past due to people spamming and framing my acount(s).
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "William Borland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3C589D in RH 5.2?
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 14:26:58 -0500
Nick,
Have the same problem when I upgraded from 5.0 to 5.2. I had a working
system before and now it thinks my pcmcia/eth card is memory!!!! Check your
/var/log/messages file for messages. It also can not find irq 10 for
pcmcia, only irq 11 for pcmcia which in Windoz is the eth. I have
reinstalled pcmcia and trippled checked everything. Reading the HOWTO does
not hint as to my sysptoms.
Could you check /proc/ioports and tell me if you see an io address assigned
to pcmcia. What card are you using?
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>I'm new to Linux. I installed RedHat 5.2 on my notebook, which has a 3Com
>3C589D PCMCIA NIC. The documentation on the CD indicates that the 3C589 is
>supported, but the installation didn't find the NIC and when it presented
me
>with a list of the possible NICs, 3C589 was not among the 3Com NICs in the
>list. Is my NIC supported? The Notebook is dual boot with Win95, and the
NIC
>works fine when running Windoze, so there doesn't appear to be a hardware
>problem.
>
>Nick
>
>
------------------------------
From: Mr. Robert A. Beyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network Card Sustained Data Transfer Rate?
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 20:34:50 GMT
Would you know the Sustained Data Transfer Rate (measured in MB/sec) of various
Network Card options; such as 100 BaseT, etc? What are the fastest options available
for tranferring data; workstation to and from a server?
Please, let me know. Thank you.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Duchowski)
Subject: Re: ppp: getting strange AT stuff from peer? (SOLVED)
Date: 2 Jan 1999 19:09:17 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <76k8jl$lnt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrew Duchowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm trying to get ppp working for two different connections. I
>got it to go for one but not the other. I can get to both from
>win98, however. Here's what's happening:
>
>connection1:
> works ok since as expected I get the (ogin:) and (assword:) prompts.
> Everything from then on is fine.
>
>connection2:
> I don't get the (ogin:) and (assword:) prompts, instead I get
> the following three lines:
>
> AT&FX4&C1&D3M0$SB115200S7=60S0=1&W
> AT&FX4&C1&D3M0$SB115200S7=60S0=1&W
> AT&FX4&C1&D3M0$SB115200S7=60S0=1&W
Got it to work: connection1 doesn't seem to use PAP/CHAP, so it just
expects the login and password to go through the phone line. For this,
the ppp-on-dialer script works fine, the login and password are simply
transmitted, once the serial connection is up, pppd takes over. This
seems less secure however than connection2.
connection2 uses PAP, so although I still don't know what the "AT" stuff
is, I don't care. What I had to do to get it working was realize that
the serial connection (stuff in ppp-on-dialer sript) was set up once
the CONNECT verification was received. From then on, ppp-on-dialer should
finish and let pppd take over. Now, pppd knows what to do with the "AT"
stuff and continues from there. One more thing I needed in the
/etc/ppp/options file is to let pppd know that the user id and password
are now sitting in the /etc/ppp/pap-secrets file. This seems to have
been accomplished through the "user <id>" option in the /etc/ppp/options
file.
So, in summary: if your ISP doesn't use PAP/CHAP, you should be able
to provide the login info right through the dialer (but this seems less
secure). If your ISP does use PAP/CHAP, you shouldn't wait for the
(ogin:) and (assword:) prompts in your dialer, instead stick the
login info into either the pap-secrets or chap-secrets file, depending
on what your ISP uses.
...and watch your /var/log/messages and /var/log/ppp.log files via
tail -f, it helps :)
--
Andrew T. Duchowski office:444 Edwards Hall area code:864
Computer Science Dept., MS-1906 tel:656.7677 cel:982.5809 fax:656.0145
Clemson University mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clemson, SC 29634-1906 http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~andrewd/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JunkDTectr)
Subject: Re: NT 4 and network problems - contd
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 19:35:23 GMT
Sorry, you could/should have gotten my post earlier. I posted it
12/15/98.
I noticed a bunch of posts with "quoted text muted" from usit.net
on 1/2/99.
Is comp.os.linux.networking moderated?
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Thanks for that but ive sent the NT box back to PC Direct who have agreed to
> credit me due to the problems ive had.......
>
> It was NT workstation not Server btw
>
> Thing
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Unsuccessful connection to EarthLink, please help!!!
Date: 2 Jan 1999 06:41:03 -0600
Paul Frets ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Tyler Dinh wrote:
: > Jan 1 17:32:47 tyler chat[284]: expect (word:)
: > Jan 1 17:33:07 tyler chat[284]: ELN/xxxxxxx^M
: > Jan 1 17:33:17 tyler chat[284]: Password:
: > Jan 1 17:33:17 tyler chat[284]: -- got it
: > Jan 1 17:33:17 tyler chat[284]: send (xxxxxxxxx^M)
: > Jan 1 17:33:17 tyler chat[284]: expect (CONNECT)
: > Jan 1 17:33:37 tyler chat[284]: ^M
: > Jan 1 17:33:47 tyler chat[284]: Entering PPP Mode.^M
: > Jan 1 17:34:07 tyler chat[284]: IP address is xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx^M
: > Jan 1 17:34:17 tyler chat[284]: MTU is 1500.^M
: > Jan 1 17:35:17 tyler chat[284]: ^M
: > Jan 1 17:35:17 tyler chat[284]: NO CARRIER
: > Jan 1 17:35:17 tyler chat[284]: -- failed
: > Jan 1 17:35:17 tyler chat[284]: Failed (NO CARRIER)
: > Jan 1 17:35:18 tyler pppd[283]: Exit.
: Tyler
: Try and get rid of that last 'CONNECT' in your chat or ppp connection
: script. (You have two "CONNECT" statements, I'm thinkin'). Your
: connection is timing out waiting for that last 'CONNECT' to come thru.
Right! I missed this, but the IRQ needs to be corrected too or you will
spend a *lot* of time on line. :)
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: "Cherokee Health Systems" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Okay, this is a tough one, using NT PDC for logins into my Linux box
Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 13:27:31 -0500
I want to use my NT PDC to be the login authenticator for my Linux machine.
I don't know if it is possible to do that. I am not just talking Samba
logins, but initial logins. Any ideas?
I would like all the existing user accounts in the network to be available
to my Linux machine instead of making new ones.
Please help.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: linux network problem, linksys ethernet cards
Date: 2 Jan 1999 19:49:54 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Scott M. Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> I need some help with a configuration problem with Red Hat 5.2. I'm
> installing it into a Pentium-166 machine, PCI, SCSI, with a LinkSys
> etherfast network card.
>
> During boot, the machine hangs for several minutes while starting the
> sendmail and httpd daemons, and locks entirely while starting snmb.
> Removing the ethernet card fixes the problem and the machine boots
> without error, but of course without network support.
>
> Is there a hardware incompatibility? When entering network config, I
> chose the appropriate IP address & subnet mask, but left the nameserver
> options at default (perhaps this was not a good idea).
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I may be reached via email at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---
> Scott, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
The daemons are timing out trying to resolve their own hostname. Make sure
you are using reserved ip addresses eg, 192.168.xx.xx. Otherwise you may
have collisions with names of real places on the internet as far the
nameservers are concerned.
I would personally would use /etc/hosts with your machine such that:
127.0.0.1 localhost
192.168.1.3 myhostname.yourispdomain.com myhostname
where 192.168.1.3 is the IP of your machine and 192.168.1.0 is the local
ethernet (netmask 255.255.255.0)
'ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.3 netmask 255.255.255.0' to bring it up...
'route add -net 192.168.1.0' for routing say...
And a /etc/resolv.conf of...
search mydomain myispdomain
nameserver 209.30.0.9
nameserver 209.30.0.100
..where the nameservers are the real ones you use. I am assuming this
what you might want.
It is important to get the hostname issue right because problems will
show up left and right with things like: slow Sendmail,
slow telnet logons, broken Samba browsing, slow Emacs start-ups, etc.
Hope this helps,
Dave
------------------------------
From: Dale Miracle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: setting up virtual host
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 13:10:38 -0500
Lucas Williams wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I have been looking around the internet for help on virtual hosting a
> website.
> I have seen the option in the httpd.conf and supposedly have it set right. I
> have the IP Address for it, assigned by my ISP, but I still can't connect to
> it.
> I think it is becuase I have to bind that IP to the server, but I can't
> figure out how to do that.
> If any of you have any information on how to setup a Virtual Host on Redhat
> 4.2, please let me know.
> I am running Apache 1.1.3.
> I hope that helps you guys out.
>
> Lucas Williams
> System Administrator
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out http://www.apache.org/docs/vhosts/index.html this get you in
the right direction. Do you have your pc's ip's setup to use the
addition ip address's? Here is a quick primer to get that going on
that, was going to locate a how-to but I have done it on 3 vhosts of my
own over here.
In make menuconfig (same as make config it just uses a menu type
screen).
Go into networking options and select Network aliasing. Cursor down to
it and type Y . Then go down to aliasing support and type M to make it
a module. Build your kernel and be sure to do make modules then do
make modules_install . That will build your modules and install them.
Reboot the machine with the new kernel and edit your rc.local (it just
put it here because it is the last rc file to be read on bootup) and put
the follow in, i will use one of my vhost's as an example
/sbin/insmod /usr/src/linux/modules/ip_alias.o
/sbin/ifconfig eth0:0 www.linearnet.org
/sbin/route add -host www.linearnet.org dev eth0:0
You only have to do insmod once then repeat lines 2 and 3 for each host
you want to have. Your vhosts start at 0:0 then go on to 0:1, 0:2 etc
etc.
If you need more specific instructions just ask.
--
Dale Miracle "No matter where you go, there you are",
System Administrator Oliver's Law of Location
The Edge of Insanity "Real funny Scotty, now beam down my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] clothes"
"I've gone to look for my self, if I return before I get
back keep me here."
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
