Linux-Networking Digest #499, Volume #10 Mon, 15 Mar 99 01:13:33 EST
Contents:
Re: Capturing Masq Packets with Sniffit (kaos)
[q] 2.2.x multicast ping fails? (Mark Swanson)
[q] Linux and JDK1.2 and JavaSpaces (Mark Swanson)
Re: Funky domains (Miguel Cruz)
Re: Is there a WinNT/Linux guide for idiots? (Miguel Cruz)
Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help ("Doug Anderson")
Re: Mirroring an NT-Server with Linux (Miguel Cruz)
Re: accessing nt shared directories (Miguel Cruz)
Re: NETGEAR (TJ)
Re: Linux----->W98----->modem------>internet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PAP problems (hASCII)
Re: Firewall with 1 IP ("George Georgakis")
how to mount another linux server's cdrom? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests ("William Grinolds")
Thinkpad 600 external serial not recognized or initialized (Jeffrey Veiss (CTG))
Re: MCSE preparation exams (Miguel Cruz)
Stupid question about remote shell cammands. (Stephen Loewinsohn)
telnet & samba work, but ftp doesn't (Chuck Landress)
token ring sniffer (Matthias Kolbusa)
pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2 (Andreas Grabner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: kaos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Capturing Masq Packets with Sniffit
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 01:56:29 GMT
Brian Ferris wrote:
> I'm using Sniffit (lastest beta off the sniffit page) to capture
> packets on my RedHat 5.2 Firewall. The program works fine for capturing
> packets that come directly to or from the firewall (ex. Telnet) but not
> for any of the packets that are masqueraded through the firewall.
> The server is used to provide internet access for our 80 user LAN
> and I am trying to use sniffit it so we can monitor web traffic to see
> if anyone is surfing where they shouldn't be. Right now sniffit
> captures everything on the 192.168.1.0 net. Why don't I get masqueraded
> packets? Is it maybe because sniffit uses the internal network
> interface (as opposed to the card that is on the external side of the
> firewall)?
> Any help would be most appreciated.
If you are able to capture the packets on the internal network, you can
view their destination information in the capture file. And like you said,
you have to use the eth card with the external ip to view outgoing
packets(assuming I understood you correctly and thats what you want), to do
this just use the -F flag,
i.e. sniffit -p whatever -F eth0 -s external-ip, assuming eth0 is the eth
card bound to the external address, and you want to view info that is
sent. I think the best idea might be to sniff the lan though. Use a
configuration file to select all computers on the lan ( i think its
192.168.1. in the conf file) and sniff all the packets going to those
computers, this should give you output files of the format
Internet_host_ip-LAN_host_ip(at least it does for me)
keep sniffing
------------------------------
From: Mark Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [q] 2.2.x multicast ping fails?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:05:20 GMT
New to multicasting...
When I ping 224.0.0.0 should I not receive echo responses from *all*
multicast boxes on my network?
(I'm not seeing anything from the Win95 boxes on my network - and they
have routes to 224.0.0.0)?
Thanks!
P.S. - the Linux Multicat HOWTO doesn't give this answer..
--
===============================================
If DOS means "Denial Of Service" what's MS-DOS?
And why should I tell it to "win"?
------------------------------
From: Mark Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [q] Linux and JDK1.2 and JavaSpaces
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:16:33 GMT
Has anyone got this working? Everything starts up fine but nothing
happens - I can't start the browser on a 95 box and view the Space on
the Linux box. I don't know if multicasting and 2.2.1 work.
Thanks.
--
===============================================
If DOS means "Denial Of Service" what's MS-DOS?
And why should I tell it to "win"?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Subject: Re: Funky domains
Date: 15 Mar 1999 05:19:04 GMT
Evan Wolenzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a radio station in St. Louis that's promoting its new website,
> www.97.fm . Now, .fm is Micronesia, but a search at apnic.net didn't
> turn up anything, and InterNIC doesn't recognize them either. And yet
> this domain WORKS. How is this possible?
You can't even find Canada at Internic, let alone UN punching bag
Micronesia. It only handles a very few top-level domains (com, org, net, and
edu).
For information on the .fm domain, visit www.nic.fm (which is in Japan).
> I realize you can program anything you want into your own named files,
> but how do you get people outside of your domain to see this?
You don't, unless you sneak into their offices in the middle of the night
and change their resolver configuration.
miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Subject: Re: Is there a WinNT/Linux guide for idiots?
Date: 15 Mar 1999 05:20:34 GMT
Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Get the book "Samba: Integrating Unix and Windows" by John D. Blair,
> published by SSC. Best explanation of Windows Networking that I've ever
> seen.
It's so good that I use it to help me figure out purely Windows NT admin
issues.
miguel
------------------------------
From: "Doug Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.ps.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 18:39:17 -0600
What an asshole!
If any of you Microsoft haters out there ever want to see Linux be a serious
alternative to Windows, this mentality must be severely discouraged!!!
Statements like "Linux ISN'T easy to learn" tells every potential Win95
convert to not even try to learn. Bill G. couldn't orchestrate a better
anti-Linux campaign than having "true" Linux professionals like this
advertise the fact.
JMO,
-Doug
Glenn Graham wrote in message ...
>Wrong wrong wrong.
>Linux kernels do not come with everything installed.
>Anyone who's going to learn unix ( sorry linux ) had better as hell
>learn a little about c code and compiling the damd kernel.
>
>If they don't we're going to end up with a mess of windows 95
>users all over again.
>
>Linux ISN'T easy to learn. It's still under development and
>isn't something I'de suggest would be ( sorry ) plug and play.
>
>Let them learn ! Let and make them learn how to compile a darn kernakl,
>and let them have to re - install 15 billion times untill they get it
>right.
>
>I had to.. and very few people took any pitty on me what so ever when
>I was learning this O/s five years ago.
>
>============================================================
>inTEXT Communications
>Internet Security Unix Networking Specialist
>http://www.intextonline.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>On 5 Mar 1999, Bill Unruh wrote:
>
>> Date: 5 Mar 1999 01:53:34 GMT
>> From: Bill Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking, comp.os.linux.setup,
>> comp.ps.linux.hardware, alt.os.linux
>> Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
>>
>> In <7bmtjk$43h$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> fred anger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >In article <7bjrkc$83v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh) wrote:
>> >> everything you want already in the kernel. Do not compile the kernel.
>>
>> >This leaves too many variables open if (when) it doesn't work. If there
is no
>> >support for IP Firewalling, Forwarding, Masquerading et al. compiled
into the
>> >kernel, he's just going to end up giving up because it won't work. The
only
>> >way to know for sure is to configure and compile a new kernel. It's not
a
>> >horrible thing. In fact 'make xconfig' is quite nice. Read the kernel
howto
>> >and jump in.
>>
>> Look. Most of the current disrtibutions have everything and their dog
>> already compiled in. do you know of a distribution tht does not already
>> have all of that in? To advise someone who just wants to get something
>> working that first they have to spend a lot of time learning and taking
>> on the biggest compilation job they are ever liable to tackel in their
>> lives (with enough incomprehensible options to freeze the best of minds)
>> is guarenteed to make sure they flee in horror from Linux. Linux has now
>> passed out of its "experiment" days, and is being used by people who
>> have jobs to accomplish, and see Linux as a tool, not a learing
>> opportunity. I regard it as a learning opportunity, but most "newbies"
>> do not. They just want to get the damn thing working. And to do so, a
>> very good first approximation is "DO NOT COMPILE THE KERNEL." It
>> (whatever you as a newbie wants) is probably already in the distributed
>> kernel.
>>
>> I have seen far too many posts from people who try to set up PPP and the
>> first thing they see in the howto is "compile the kernel". That is
>> insane. The kernel they have already has ppp compiled in. Your position
>> is like telling someone who wants to drive a car, that first thing they
>> should do is to remove the engine and hone the cylinders on their new
>> car. It is senseless and they are far far more liable to do harm to the
>> engine (kernel) than either to learn or improve things. Let them get
>> used to Linux first, let them learn that Linux is useful and is really
>> not that intimidating. Then they can learn to tinker if they want to or
>> have to. But to advise someone to replace a kernel which already has
>> everything they want with a recompiled one which they may well have
>> broken by not understanding enough, just for the learning experience is
>> not something I would condone.
>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Subject: Re: Mirroring an NT-Server with Linux
Date: 15 Mar 1999 05:31:29 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Thorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mount the NT disks on the linux box with smbmount.
Have you managed to get smbmount to work stably? The longest I can get it to
stay up is about a day. Then the mount disappears, replaced by I/O errors.
miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Subject: Re: accessing nt shared directories
Date: 15 Mar 1999 05:22:54 GMT
Daniel Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the linux mount point a name or what is that?
It's an empty directory that you have previously created. Once you do the
mount command, the mount point directory will be magically full of the
remote files.
> Also, is smb on my linux or is this something I need to download.
I don't know; is there milk in your refrigerator? This is something that
only you can know. Try to follow the instructions; if they don't work, then
samba probably isn't on your computer.
miguel
------------------------------
From: TJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NETGEAR
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 21:35:40 -0800
I am responding to you right now from home via a win95 desktop which is
passing thru a masquerade on my Linux server (a Dell inspiron 3000 LAPTOP
using a 3com 3c562D mulifunction pcmcia nic/modem!!!) which are connected
via the Netgear SB104 (a kit that includes 2 NIC cards, an EN104 hub and
cables). I wouldn't have it any other way ($$$).
- t j
Joseph White wrote:
> HI ALL,
>
> I'm thinking of buying a four port hub and a couple of NIC's so I can
> setup a Linux server w/Samba.
> Netgear by Bay Networks has some good deals, but I don't know if their
> products work with Linux. I'm running Redhat 5.1 - Intel, I read the
> hardware list, but could not determine from the list if Netgear products
> were supported or not.
>
> If anyone has info on Netgear or any other economical solutions for a
> small home network, please let me know.
>
> Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux----->W98----->modem------>internet
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:41:47 GMT
I used a program called wingate to set up the 98 box as a proxy. then
i configured netscape on my linux box to use the ip of my 98 "proxy",
and i was outbound. you can download wingate, can't remember the url
though
good luck
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 23:20:46 GMT, Marc Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>you would need some modem sharing software that is Unix friendly,I know
>of several that will share modem that is on a windows box,,but it
>requires you to load software on the client side,,and they only support
>M$ stuff,,I dont know of any that allow anyone to use the
>connection,,,,the best thing to do is do this the other way around
>
>ie
>win98------>Linux------->modem------>internet
>
>you can set this up using diald and IP forwarding/masquerading
>Hope this helps
>
>
>GN wrote:
>>
>> HI !
>> I.m up to a little problem :|
>>
>> I have a network with 2 computers and the first one is a Linux system
>> (Redhat 5.2) and the second one is a PC with W98.
>> And my question is as follow.
>>
>> 1. Can a connect to the internet with my linux comp by going trough my
>> win98computer who already is connected to Internet via modem?
>>
>> If any1 can send me to the right spot where to find this information i�ll be
>> graetful.
>>
>> /GN
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: hASCII <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux
Subject: PAP problems
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:41:24 GMT
Hi there !
When I try to connect to my ISP the PAP authentication fails.
May the login name / the passwort be too long ?
What else might be wrong ?
Thanks in Advance
Markus
/var/log/messages
ipppd[3313]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED, ifunit: 0, linkunit: 0,
fd: 8
ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic 0x758376ff>]
ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <mru 1524> <auth
chap md5> <MPmrru 0x5f4> <MPdiscr: 0x3
ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00> <MPmrru 0x5f4>]
ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1524> <magic 0x758376ff>]
ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524> <auth chap md5>
<MPdiscr: 0x3 [ 00 c0 7b 53 4f 46 ]>]
ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfNak id=0x2 <auth pap>]
ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1524> <auth pap> <MPdiscr:
0x3 [ 00 c0 7b 53 4f 46 ]>]
ipppd[3313]: sent [0][LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <mru 1524> <auth pap> <MPdiscr:
0x3 [ 00 c0 7b 53 4f 46 ]>]
ipppd[3313]: lcp layer is UP
ipppd[3313]: sent [0][PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="longerusername"
password="longpasswort"]
ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][PAP AuthNak id=0x1msg="Authentication
failure\015\012"]
ipppd[3313]: Remote message: Authentication failure^M
ipppd[3313]: PAP authentication failed
ipppd[3313]: rcvd [0][LCP TermReq id=0x4]
ipppd[3313]: LCP terminated by peer
/etc/ppp/options.ippp0
# The IP addresses: <local>:<remote>
# just "0.0.0.0:" or nothing for dynamic IP
# 0.0.0.0:
debug
+pwlog
# my user name (only for PAP!)
user "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
# my system name (only for CHAP!)
# name "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
/etc/pap-secrets
# client server pw iplist
"longusername" * "longpassword"
------------------------------
From: "George Georgakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Firewall with 1 IP
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:43:22 GMT
No question, go the IP_Masq route! :) It costs you nothing extra, though
some functions will need to be specially configured.
OTOH, if you can get a "Class C" network for free (note that "Class" terms
are now obsolete), it's worthwhile going that way.
George
Eduardo Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > - My ISP has asigned me 1 static IP.
> > - I have a LAN, and 3 NT Web servers on it that I want to make
available to
> > Inet with 192.168.X.X IPs.
> > - I want to put a Linux RedHat 5.2 based firewall before the LAN.
> >
> > Would it be possible with just 1 IP, maybe with IP Masquerading or
should I
> > ask for a Class C Network?
> >
> > Answers will be welcome by private e-mail.
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
> You can't expect anybody out of your intranet to reach your servers if
> they are in a private network like 192.168.X.X; and you cannot use
> public IP's unless you pay for them.
>
> However, you can use xinetd to redirect external calls to your Linux
> firewall to your NT servers. This way, only your proxy can be reached,
> requests are serviced by your NT servers. From out of your network,
> people will see 3 web servers at the same public IP (on different
> ports), but each one will be of the NT servers.
>
>
> I hope this helps.
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: how to mount another linux server's cdrom?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:42:58 GMT
Hi,
I have read howtos and man but still can figured out.
Could someone list a 1-2-3 step here? I have made these two linux
servers netted by pinging each other and read http://192.168.1.1
Thanks. Peter
------------------------------
From: "William Grinolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:44:30 GMT
Thanks for your response and for putting my mind at ease. I'm currently
using pppd version 2.2, and I see nothing in the man pages about -bsdcomp.
Oh well - I'll just live with it. :-) Thanks again.
Bill
Clifford Kite wrote in message <7b6n6t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Compression Control Protocol. The ISP requests a few flavors of STAC
>and then Microsoft Point-to-Point compression, both are propriatary
>and pppd can't do them. Not serious as you observed. The pppd option
>-bsdcomp *may* get rid of it. There is a noccp option in ppp-2.3.5 that
>*should* get rid of it.
>
>The ISP PPP implementation is slightly broken - not uncommon - and
>doesn't know how to properly terminate the CCP negotiations when pppd
>rejects all that it offers.
>
><snip>
>
>: Feb 23 21:26:09 st-gate pppd[849]: sent [CCP TermAck id=0x0]
>: Feb 23 21:26:12 st-gate pppd[849]: CCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
------------------------------
From: Jeffrey Veiss (CTG) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,linux.dev.laptop,linux.dev.serial
Subject: Thinkpad 600 external serial not recognized or initialized
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:46:48 GMT
***NOTE: Before you reply, remove "SPAMSUCKS" from my e-mail address.
I have a IBM Thinkpad 600 (266MHz PII, 64M, etc.) running both Redhat 5.2
and Windows 98. For some reason, I can't seem to get the external 9-pin
serial port to be recognized. Any suggestions, advice, or insights are
appreciated!
Here's some notes:
o I made sure it's enabled using the TP utilites, and I disabled the
internal modem and the IR port.
o I've tried various incantations of setserial v2.15 before I inserted
the PC card modem using the parameters reported by windows 98:
setserial /dev/cua0 auto_irq skip_test autoconfig session_lockout
setserial /dev/cua0 irq 4 port 0x03f8-0x03ff session_lockout
o I added the following lines to config.opts (comments removed):
include port 0x100-0x4ff, port 0x1000-0x17ff
include memory 0xc0000-0xfffff, memory 0xa0000000-0xa0ffffff
exclude port 0x2f8-0x2ff
include port 0xa00-0xaff
exclude irq 4
exclude irq 7
o I also have a Simpletech 56k modem and 3COM 3c589d ethernet PC card, both
of which work fine. Here's the output from cardctl:
[root@ferret pcmcia]# cardctl config
Socket 0:
Vcc = 5.0, Vpp1 = 0.0, Vpp2 = 0.0
Interface type is memory and I/O
IRQ 9 is exclusive, level mode, enabled
Speaker output is enabled
Function 0:
Config register base = 0xff80
Option = 0x5f, status = 0x08, pin = 0000
I/O window 1: 0x03e8 to 0x03ef, 8 bit
Socket 1:
Vcc = 5.0, Vpp1 = 0.0, Vpp2 = 0.0
Interface type is memory and I/O
IRQ 3 is exclusive, level mode, enabled
Function 0:
Config register base = 0x10000
Option = 0x41, status = 0000
I/O window 1: 0x0300 to 0x030f, 16 bit
[root@ferret pcmcia]# cardctl config
Socket 0:
Vcc = 5.0, Vpp1 = 0.0, Vpp2 = 0.0
Interface type is memory and I/O
IRQ 9 is exclusive, level mode, enabled
Speaker output is enabled
Function 0:
Config register base = 0xff80
Option = 0x5f, status = 0x08, pin = 0000
I/O window 1: 0x03e8 to 0x03ef, 8 bit
Socket 1:
Vcc = 5.0, Vpp1 = 0.0, Vpp2 = 0.0
Interface type is memory and I/O
IRQ 3 is exclusive, level mode, enabled
Function 0:
Config register base = 0x10000
Option = 0x41, status = 0000
I/O window 1: 0x0300 to 0x030f, 16 bit
Please contact me if there are any further questions via internet mail at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you very much!
Jeffrey Veiss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) PO Box 5400
Network Engineer Princeton, NJ 08543-5400
Corporate Telecommunications (609) 818-3308
Bristol-Myers Squibb (609) 818-7814 (fax)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: MCSE preparation exams
Date: 15 Mar 1999 05:33:34 GMT
Jimmy Navarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's also MCP and A+. In Los Angeles just to take A+ certification would
> be more or less $1,000 while MCSE to <$2,500>.
Out of curiosity, is that figure for the MCSE the cost of the exam or the
training and the whole shebang? I have a suspicion I would be able to have
more fun preaching linux if I could wave an MSCE in people's faces. And how
hard can it be? I've flipped through the books in stores and everything was
completely obvious.
miguel
------------------------------
From: Stephen Loewinsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Stupid question about remote shell cammands.
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:49:49 GMT
I have two RH5.2 machines (workstation install) connected via crossover
cable. They can rlogin, but they can't rsh. The error message is
"Permission denied". What do I need to change to allow them to rsh?
Thanks,
-Steve
------------------------------
From: Chuck Landress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: telnet & samba work, but ftp doesn't
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:50:02 GMT
Hi I'm a newbie to Linux. I've set up samba as a file and print server
successfully and it works fine with my Win '95 boxes as clients. Ftp
doesn't work at all. If I try to open an ftp connection from a Win95
box the connection is closed immediately after openning. The
var/log/messages file doesn't show a logon through ftp.
I'd appreciate any help. I'm using Red Hat 5.2.
Thanks, Chuck Landress
------------------------------
From: Matthias Kolbusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: token ring sniffer
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:43:08 GMT
I=B4ve been doing sniffing-experiments on ethernets?
My question: is it possible to sniff token-ring-LANs in the same manner?
Matthias
------------------------------
From: Andreas Grabner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,linux.redhat.ppp,at.linux
Subject: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:54:30 GMT
Hi
After I update my kernel to 2.2.x and pppd to 2.3.5 i can' t connect to
my ISP when I boot kernel 2.2.
when i boot 2.0.35 it works.
i think there i a problem with LCP or in the kernel 2.2.2.
i installed pppd 2.3.5 new and compile the kernel 2.2 new (maybe
something goes wrong??)
i'm not very good on english and LINUX but read man pppd and an old
HOW-TO
heres my log:
Feb 27 22:21:29 film pppd[437]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: timeout set to 45 seconds
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: abort on (BUSY)
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: abort on (ERROR)
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: send (AT&F&C1&D2^M)
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: expect (OK)
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: AT&F&C1&D2^M^M
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: OK
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: -- got it
Feb 27 22:21:30 film chat[438]: send (ATDT0718914012^M)
Feb 27 22:21:31 film chat[438]: expect (CONNECT)
Feb 27 22:21:31 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: ATDT0718914012^M^M
Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: CONNECT
Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: -- got it
Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: send (\d)
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: expect (sername:)
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: 115200^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: *** WILLKOMMEN BEI
UNIVERSITY VIENNA ONLINE! ***^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: phone: (+43 1)
4277-14060^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: fax: (+43 1)
4277-9140^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film last message repeated 2 times
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: User Access Verification^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: Username:
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: -- got it
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: send (a9003521^M)
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: expect (ssword:)
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: a9003521^M
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: Password:
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: -- got it
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: send (internet^M)
Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: expect (>)
Feb 27 22:21:59 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:59 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:59 film chat[438]: ^M
Feb 27 22:21:59 film chat[438]: unetts2 - line 44>
Feb 27 22:21:59 film chat[438]: -- got it
Feb 27 22:21:59 film chat[438]: send (ppp^M)
Feb 27 22:21:59 film pppd[437]: Serial connection established.
Feb 27 22:22:00 film pppd[437]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 27 22:22:00 film pppd[437]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
Feb 27 22:22:00 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:01 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc3 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:01 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc3 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:02 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:04 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc4 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:04 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc4 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:04 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:06 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc5 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:06 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc5 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:06 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:08 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc6 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:08 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc6 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:08 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:10 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc7 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:10 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc7 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:10 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:12 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc8 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:12 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc8 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:12 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:14 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xc9 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:14 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xc9 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:14 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:16 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xca <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:16 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xca <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:16 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:18 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xcb <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:18 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xcb <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:18 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x578aff6f> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 27 22:22:20 film pppd[437]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0xcc <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:20 film pppd[437]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0xcc <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0xad8d7762> <pcomp> <accom
p>]
Feb 27 22:22:20 film pppd[437]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Feb 27 22:22:20 film pppd[437]: Connection terminated.
Feb 27 22:22:20 film pppd[437]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Feb 27 22:22:20 film pppd[437]: Exit.
an my options (i tryed a lot of other)
/dev/ttyS2
115200
crtscts
modem
debug
defaultroute
asyncmap 0
(lcp-restart 2)
thanks for help
Andreas Grabner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
