Linux-Networking Digest #522, Volume #10 Tue, 16 Mar 99 23:13:41 EST
Contents:
What is a "winmodem"? ("HAL")
Is it possible to make a digital loopback with ISDN? (Konstantin Wiesel)
Anybody experiences in using ISDN for Linux within a local telephone facility?
(Konstantin Wiesel)
Re: Version of gcc? (John McKown)
Re: Setting up NE 2000 compliant card (Guy Turcotte)
Re: PPP is frequently "stalled" - why? (bklimas)
Re: MRTG for redhat ("Miles Elam")
Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help (wizard)
Dialup, Linux, Windows, Networking Query ("Sandy W")
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** ("Jeffrey S.
Kline")
Re: What the ...? diald is dialing for LAN requests! ("Carl R. Friend")
Re: [q] 2.2.x multicast ping fails? (Mark Swanson)
Re: Multilink & Networking Help (W R Carr)
Re: Is linux right for the job? (Dwayne McGarty)
IP Forwarding via Command Prompt (Chris Hanrahan)
Connected but can't surf ("Rob")
Re: FTP users and problems. (newbie question) ("Eugene")
Need strong ruleset ( rc.firewall ) script for IPCHAINS ("Wadels")
Re: Sextuple Boot ("Rick Droske")
Re: Multilink & Networking Help (W R Carr)
Re: NFS mounts only RO (Bernd-Ulrich Adrigam)
Re: Kernel HOWTO accuracy? (Eric)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "HAL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: What is a "winmodem"?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 08:47:11 +0900
Hello,
I use RED HAT 5.1. My internal modem is "Fujitsu Fax Voice Modem 33600
PNP - 15R", I cann't find a HOWTO about install a internal modem.
I often see a term "winmodem", whether all internal modem is "winmodem",
how to tell it?
Does an external modem not need install?
Thank for you help.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konstantin Wiesel)
Subject: Is it possible to make a digital loopback with ISDN?
Date: 17 Mar 1999 02:13:26 GMT
I would like to configure a PPP Server with I4L
and therefore use one channel as sender and the other
one as receiver for testing purposes.
Any experiences with this?
Konstantin Wiesel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konstantin Wiesel)
Subject: Anybody experiences in using ISDN for Linux within a local telephone facility?
Date: 17 Mar 1999 02:17:54 GMT
I would like to know how to configure ISDN4Linux in order to make it work
propperly within out ISDN environment (Siemens Hicom) For instance i do not
know exactly how to set the MSN correctly. Do i only have to set it with i4l
or do i have to configure the telephone facility too?
Konstantin Wiesel
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKown)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Version of gcc?
Date: 17 Mar 1999 02:19:13 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
do "gcc -v" to see your current version. I'm running 2.7.2.3, but I also have
2.9-redhat-d90810 from Cygnus' GNUPro Toolkit. The 2.7.2.3 is used to compile
the kernel.
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 10:50:01 -0700, Jason White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm having trouble compiling my kernel for the network card I want to
>use (cCom 3c905b). I suspect part of the problem might be the version
>of the gcc I'm using. I can't remember what version it is from when I
>installed it. How can I find out and how can I upgrade it if need be?
>Thanks,
>
>Jason
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guy Turcotte)
Subject: Re: Setting up NE 2000 compliant card
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 02:21:28 GMT
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:42:06 -0500, "Dunn One"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have an SMC Ezcard 10(PCI). How do I get this to work? I heard that I can
>use the NE 2000 module. Is there any program in Linux that I can use to do
>this? Please help. Thanks
>
I'm using RedHat 5.2 distributed kernel. This one already contains the
appropriate drivers for NE2000 compatible cards. On my computer, I've
two of these cards: an SMC Ezcard as yours and another third party
card. Both are working properly without tweaking any parameters in the
system. What remains for you is to configure the TCP/IP related
configs. Look in the NET3 Howto document for help.
------------------------------
From: bklimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP is frequently "stalled" - why?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 02:24:54 GMT
"B. Eubanks" wrote:
> hello,
>
> I have been noticing lately that my downloads are suspended while the
> download window indicates that the download is "(stalled)"
>
> What does this indicate about my PPP setup? Is there something that I
It likely has nothing to do with your ppp setup but with you internet
service provider (ISP) or maybe the connections further "down the
wire" that are slow. It normally is faster at 4 am during my Internet
access.
You can try a different ISP if yours is really slow. Just my opinion.
Hope this helps. Best regards,
Stan
>
> can do to fix it? While I am at it, I would also hope to increase my
> connection rate(s), but I am unfamiliar with network troublshooting on
> Linux.
>
> My system is:
>
> K6-400
> 56k v.90 Modem
> I have a dual-boot setup, and have decent ISP performance with the
> alternate OS, so I am pretty sure my hardware and ISP are not the
> problem (?)
------------------------------
From: "Miles Elam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MRTG for redhat
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 18:57:40 -0800
RedHat distributes the RPM with their "Power Tools" CD set. It's also
available on their FTP site and mirrors in the "contrib" directory, and
presumably other sites have downloads as well.
As far as a HOW-TO, the RPM is most of what you need for a standard
RedHat install assuming you have installed Apache. It really is as turnkey
as MRTG gets. Remember, RPMs are binary files. There is no tarball to be
gunzipped or unarchived, no Makefile to edit and no compiler to run. In
other words, totally unnecessary (and sometimes annoying) for the
development community, but insanely simple for the end-user.
In the end, refer to the MRTG installation information, but use it only
for reference purposes to see what was done. 90% of the setup has been done
for you.
The install basically consists of rpm -Uvh (or -i), running the
configuration script to set your router settings, enabling SNMP on your
router and openning the web browser to see the graphical results
(http://yourmachine/mrtg/). You can also check you /etc/crontab file to
make sure that the RPM edited it correctly to update every five minutes, but
chances are that it did.
- Miles Elam
===== Original Message =====
From: rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MRTG for redhat
>I need your help please with the MRTG for redhat.
>does redhat has an rpm for MRTG. Is there HOW TO
>for installation specific for the redhat other than the
>main site for the MRTG.
------------------------------
From: wizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.ps.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 21:45:22 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike W wrote:
> In article <5FYG2.1117$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Anderson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >What an asshole!
> >
> >If any of you Microsoft haters out there ever want to see Linux be a serious
> >alternative to Windows, this mentality must be severely discouraged!!!
> >Statements like "Linux ISN'T easy to learn" tells every potential Win95
> >convert to not even try to learn. Bill G. couldn't orchestrate a better
> >anti-Linux campaign than having "true" Linux professionals like this
> >advertise the fact.
> >
> >JMO,
> >-Doug
>
> By your own admission, it is a fact though. Linux is so unfriendly that
> if its ever to become a 'standard' it will have to be useable by the
> computer 'illiterate' and from what I've seen of the latest offering
> from RH its certainly not that. As someone mentioned in another thread,
> to find the faq's you need to know where they are, and how to read them.
> the MAN pages are almost unreadable, full of information but in an
> obtuse style. and there is no mention of how to use the MAN pages in the
> installation docs. You are told not to use the root account, but try
> shutting down the system from any account but root without first
> understanding the 'permissions' and changing them, which requires an
> understanding of chmod, and thats when you eventually realise that you
> have to shutdown rather than turn off the machine, after re-installing
> the damn software five times due to turning off rather than shutting
> down.
Why would you want to shut down your computer???????
Even at that Its not much different on an NT system, if you make a habit of not
sutting down properly you are sure to screw things up. The point is Linux
competes with NT not 95. Sure the installation manualls from Redhat fail to
point out how to do some things that people are use to doing in 95. The
problem with this is that LINUX is NOT 95, nor is it VMS, nor MAC OS, nor OS/2,
nor Ultrix each of which requires a proper shutdown unigue to its platform. A
good user with any respect for the hardware and software his system is developed
around would take the time to find out how to properly handle the basics.
In any event one of the best features of Linux is the command line environment
and the ability to set your system up to EXIT the graphical environment to the
command line.
Dave
>
> Where is there a description of CHMOD, SHUTDOWN, MAN, NEWUSER, LS or any
> other program in the installation docs. and to read the online docs you
> need to know how to access them.. chicken and egg ;-(
>
> Bill Gates is laughing all the way to the bank..
>
> Mike W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Never underestimate the power of Human stupidity {;o)>
------------------------------
From: "Sandy W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.slackware,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip
Subject: Dialup, Linux, Windows, Networking Query
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 04:04:04 +1100
I am hoping someone can help me with the following roblem I have.
(I think I may need Samba to complete the task)
At the momment I have a network consisting of
5 Windows '9x workstations
1 Linux Server with 2 modems
One of the modems is a perm connection to the Internet
The second I want to use as a dialup,
So from home on a Win9x machine I wish to dialup to my Linux Box at work,
from their I want to be able to both use the Internet, AND use access the
win9x workstation on the network.
I want to be able to access the win w/s's at work from my home dialup
computer as if I was in the office, able to browse drives with r/w access
via network neighborhood etc, (and probably print).
The operation on all win machines involved needs to be as simple as local
network access as it is now with no realy changes.
Can someone explain the best way to do this,
Any help on this matter would be very appriciated.
Regards
Scott Stavretis
s c o t t @ c d i . c o m . a u
------------------------------
From: "Jeffrey S. Kline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 12:38:52 -0600
I just have to step on this one a moment...
Where did you learn computers??? Do you know what "hostid" is really, and
its use and implications??? Do you know about demons, zones, and domains????
I have one of probably 1628904823e4 host ID's on my server only because I
use the same IP as the ones stated in 3 different RFC's about internal
private networks...
Is this over your head yet???
You cannot identify my boxes, any of them, from any of the rest of them out
there in the world. Then there's the story about "Dynamic" IP's which opens
the doors and windows some more on this.... Wanna keep going with this??!!!
The Intel thing is a whole different bag of worms entirely.
Jeff
Greg Gershowitz wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Someone tell my why this is such a big deal? Every unix box in
>existance has a unique ID. It's the hostid. What's it for?
>Licensing, mostly. Of course unix licensing is far more mature than
>for windows. Heck, even a 486 can be made to cough up a hostid. Of
>course, I don't know of any cases where that hostid get transmitted to
>a vendor, but what's to stop it from happening?
>
>-Greg G
>
>--
>-Greg "TORCHA" Gershowitz
>-DG3X's own Extreme Icon
>To Reply: See the organization line
>Spam sucks. Fuck you spammers. Have a Nice Day.
>http://www.geocities.com/Area51/5207
------------------------------
From: "Carl R. Friend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What the ...? diald is dialing for LAN requests!
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 20:03:22 -0500
root wrote:
>
> Thomas Lepkowski wrote:
>
> > I've just installed diald but it tries to dial my ISP when all I want to
>
> I would check your named (BIND) set up. What helps to troubleshoot
> these kinds of problems is to run tcpdump -i sl0 > outputfile
> sl0 is the slip interface.
As an amplification to that, might I suggest using the "-n" qualifier
to tcpdump so tcpdump, itself, won't be trying to do lookups.
There are several solutions to the problem if it's DNS related.
One option is to use DNS for your little local network and forego
the use of /etc/hosts. That's what I do with my LAN. (I also have
machines on my LAN which _can't_ use "hosts" files, so this was the
only chioce I had.)
A second one is to make _positive_ that all the hosts on your LAN
are in the /etc/hosts file and /etc/nsswitch.conf has DNS listed
AFTER "files".
A third, though this one has negative ramifications, is to configure
diald to ignore DNS packets. Do this, though, and you'll lose the
ability to bring the link up on a request for an outside site.
Definately sub-optimal.
My personal choice would be to configure DNS and go with that. If
you place the DNS on your diald box (also masquerading, I assume),
you'll also get the benefits of cached DNS from the outside.
--
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
| Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | West Boylston |
| Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Massachusetts, USA |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | |
| http://www.ultranet.com/~crfriend/museum | ICBM: N42:22 W71:47 |
+------------------------------------------------+---------------------+
------------------------------
From: Mark Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [q] 2.2.x multicast ping fails?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 02:58:29 GMT
Yes. Typo on my part..
So Installed another Linux box to see if that would help. It did and didn't.
Both are running 2.2.3 and I get:
[mswanson@linux:HOWTO] ping 224.0.0.1
PING 224.0.0.1 (224.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.7 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1.4 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.0.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=1.1 ms (DUP!)
--- 224.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, +2 duplicates, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.4/0.9/1.4 ms
What's with the DUP packets?
Thanks!
Mike Jagdis wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Swanson wrote:
> >New to multicasting...
> >
> >When I ping 224.0.0.0 should I not receive echo responses from *all*
> >multicast boxes on my network?
>
> No. The "all hosts" multicast address is 224.0.0.1. (The "all
> multicast routers" address is 224.0.0.2)
>
> Mike
>
> --
> A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
> On my desk I have a work station...
> .----------------------------------------------------------------------.
> | Mike Jagdis | Internet: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> | Roan Technology Ltd. | |
> | 54A Peach Street, Wokingham | Telephone: +44 118 989 0403 |
> | RG40 1XG, ENGLAND | Fax: +44 118 989 1195 |
> `----------------------------------------------------------------------'
--
===============================================
If DOS means "Denial Of Service" what's MS-DOS?
And why should I tell it to "win"?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W R Carr)
Subject: Re: Multilink & Networking Help
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:12:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:36:34 -0400, MrX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<<snip>>
>I did a pnpdump >isapnp.conf and inserted that into my /etc file.
>Rebooted and tried to initialize it by doing ppp-on.. What happens is
>-- nothing. When I do ppp-off , I get an error message saying
>
Unless Redhat is different from Slackware, the startup command for ppp
is ppp-go, not ppp-on. Maybe that's the problem.
>ERROR: PPP link is not active on ppp0!
>
------------------------------
From: Dwayne McGarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Is linux right for the job?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:06:04 GMT
As far as I know, NFS locking was not introduced until the 2.2.x
series
of kernels. I believe you will need to compile and install a
newer
kernel...
Jackson wrote:
>
> For the last two years I have been trying to get my boss to allow the
> use of Linux in a production environment. We have several SCO boxes
> that share (thru NFS) a set of directories on an SCO server. When we
> made our upgrade to the latest SCO (5.0.5a) we began having problems
> with NFS. I saw the oppurtunity to introduce linux into my work
> environment, and set up my dual Pentium Pro with SuSE 5.3 and kernel
> 2.0.35 to, to act as the new NFS server. However, problems arose when
> the client SCO machines attempted to lock access to files on the Linux
> server through lockd, and got no response from Linux. SCO's lockd works
> through RPC and I can't find the Linux equivilant. Is there one? How
> can I prove to people that Linux is ready for prime-time when it can't
> even be used as an NFS server in a mixed environment? Any help would be
> really appreciated.
>
> Thanx
>
> S Jackson
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Hanrahan)
Subject: IP Forwarding via Command Prompt
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:09:55 GMT
I'm using RedHat 5.2 and am comfortable setting up IP
Forwarding using the netcfg tool in X Windows. However, I'd like to
be able to accomplish the same thing via the command line. I tried
editing /etc/sysconfig/network and set FORWARD_IPV4 to yes, however,
the box still would not route. Are there other places that I must
make changes ? Once the device driver for an ethernet card is
installed, what's the procedure for configuring the IP address etc.
for that Interface. The only way that I know is to add the proper
ifconfig statements to the /etc/rc.d/rc.local file, but clearly, there
is another way, since after using X to accomplish the same thing,
rc.local is untouched. Can someone point me in the right direction ?
Thanks
Chris Hanrahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connected but can't surf
Date: 16 Mar 1999 19:37:03 -0600
""I connect ok but am not able to connect to any
sites."""
I Have SuSe 6.0 I have used Yast to install ppp and suse ppp, I have set up
the name serverserver to my match my ISP's IP address. I am using kppp to
dial
my internet provider. It seems I connect ok but am not able to connect to
any
sites. When I ping servers I get "Network is unreachable" Here is what
netscape says:
"Warning: the following hosts are unknown:
home.netscape.com
home6.netscape.com
internic.net
This means that some or all the hosts will be unreachable.
Perhaps there is aproblem with your name server?
If your site must use a non-root name server, you will need to set the
$SOCKS_NS environment variable to point at the appropriate name server."
I have check for any setting of $SOCKS_NS and did not find anything.
Since I am using kppp I have also set the name server to my ISP
I am using a 56k modem to dial my ISP wirefire.com
Any help would certainly be appreciated
P.S.
I am new to LINUX
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FTP users and problems. (newbie question)
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:16:26 GMT
/etc/ftpusers is a list of users who are NOT allowed ftp access
as for /home/ftp, take a look at chroot
Janne Saarinen wrote in message <7clvkr$hk0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>i have RH5.2 and i wondering how i can define what users can use FTP
service
>and who dont. (/etc/ftpusers ?)
>
>and how i can make FTP user go to directly /home/ftp -dir where is all
>necessary files what i want share via ftp?
>and when user is in /home/ftp dir he cannot change dir to up level (exam.
>/home or every where else.)
>
>stupid questions yeah, but i need help!
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Wadels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need strong ruleset ( rc.firewall ) script for IPCHAINS
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 01:25:10 GMT
I once downloaded and used a long (thorough) rc.firewall ruleset for
ipfwadm, which worked well on Caldera OpenLinux. But I needed DHCPcd, so had
to upgrade to RedHat, and went straight to kernel 2.2.3. I finally have the
networking up, but can't find a comparable ruleset for IPCHAINS (and lost my
old script, so I can't translate it with the wrapper).
The rc.firewall script ver. 1.5.1 from Freshmeat.net seems so small and
less DHCPcd friendly. Does anyone know where I can get a more powerful
script? It needn't support nfs, coda, XWindow ports, etc, just basic web and
e-mail services, very securely.
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: "Rick Droske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.netware.misc
Subject: Re: Sextuple Boot
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 22:25:46 -0500
Yes you wouldn't want to share any of your "tricky" secrets with the general
public. After all someone else might benefit and it could even be an NT
user.
DaZZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Forrest wrote:
>
>> You're right, NT's boot loader couldn't see the Linux partition on my
>> computer.
>
>It can - you just have to be a little tricky at making it work.
>
>My NT machine boots straight into Linux from the NT loader. No hassles, no
>problems.
>
>Email if you want the exact method.
>
>DaZZa
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W R Carr)
Subject: Re: Multilink & Networking Help
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 03:10:42 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:36:34 -0400, MrX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am somewhat new to running Linux with PPP..
>On a network where the routers are doing all the work, Linux is a
>breeze.. However, with
>PPP and I am having a hell of a time..
>
>Let me tell you my inventory..
>
>1. I am running a 486 dx4100 with Redhat 5.0
>2. My modem is the Supra Sonic Dual Modem by Diamond Multimedia
>(diamondmm.com).
>3. I currently have pppd 2.3 installed on my system...
>4. The linux box will act as the network routing for PPP to my Mac and
>two other Windows
>boxes for Internet Browsing and Email (can ping internally with no
>problem).
>
>I have no idea as to how to confiugre my modem, let alone that, I want
>to configure it to dial twice since it is a dual modem.. I am using
>PPkit .7 which is essentially a
>perl script that takes in information about my user information, name
>servers etc. No
>information though regarding the hardware the PPP script has to
>communicate with...
<<snip>>
>So now to my question..
>
>1. What drivers or software do I need for my modem to work on the linux
>box?
How do you access Linux? Direct boot, or first to DOS then to Linux
via loadlin? The SupraSonic II is a PNP modem. If your motherboard
has the pnp extensions, it will configure the modem. If not, and you
boot to DOS first, the utility dwcfgmg.sys inserted as the first line
in your config.sys file will configure the modem for you. HOWEVER,
if you are booting directly to Linux, I see no problem. If you
compiled your kernel with PNP option "Y", Linux will find the modems
and configure them. It sets my SupraSonic II to the standard dos-mode
COM3/COM4 settings. As far as using both modems for the link to your
ISP, line equalization is NOT what is needed. Multi-point protocol is
what is needed. See the following URL for more information:
http://mp.ins-coin.de/
Good Luck!
Raymond Carr
<<snip>>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd-Ulrich Adrigam)
Subject: Re: NFS mounts only RO
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 04:47:39 +0100
Brian Dawson schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Has anyone experienced this problem:
>
>When mounting shares via NFS, all mounts are given RO status due to the
>following error:
>
>Feb 25 13:27:32 orion nfsd[9394]: exports file has anon entries, but
>host
>Feb 25 13:27:32 orion nfsd[9394]: has non-private IP address 62.24.0.4!
>Feb 25 13:27:32 orion nfsd[9394]: clnt <anon clnt> exports:
>Feb 25 13:27:32 orion nfsd[9394]:
>^I/usr/local/own/apache_1.3.4+jserv10b2+authmysql/htdocs ro noroot
>Feb 25 13:27:32 orion nfsd[9394]: ^I/tmp ro noroot
>
>I have made sure that name resoultion is possible with this host, and
>that the export file does not have RO set. Is there a problem with the
>actual network address?
>
>Thanks for any info,
>
>Brian
>
Hello,
could you post the /etc/exports of the nfs-server and the /etc/fstab of the
nfs-client (or the mount-statement, you tried?
Bernd
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Kernel HOWTO accuracy?
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 21:12:06 -0700
Walter L. Williams wrote:
> Hi all
> I thinking of trying out the new kernel.
> (2.2.3)
>
> How accurate is the current kernel
> howto? The one I found on the Metalab
> (sunsite) site is dated late May 1997.
>
> Also has anyone run into problems
> while trying to update?
>
> Any input will be greatly appreciated
>
> Walt
There is an actuall 2.2.x kernel upgrade How To on Redhat's site, it was
99% accurate. If you are not running
Redhat, the only difference is the you will have to do the package
upgrades the old fashioned way instead of using Rpm's.
Eric
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
