Linux-Networking Digest #527, Volume #10 Wed, 17 Mar 99 11:14:47 EST
Contents:
Re: Version of gcc? (postmaster)
Re: Version of gcc? (postmaster)
Re: Version of gcc? (postmaster)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (gus)
Re: What is a "winmodem"? (John Thompson)
Re: ansi - iso standard c function definitions (Michael Kat)
Ethernet card IP setup in RedHat 5.2 ("Icon")
Re: ppp problem! (Clifford Kite)
crossed cables for direct 10/100 base-T connections (Paul Knowles)
Re: SNMP manager for linux (Mogens Kjaer)
Re: Version of gcc? ("Thomas T. Veldhouse")
Proxy Serving with PPP Dialup ("TwinEngines Inc.")
diald rules to detect masq packets (Keith)
Re: Interesting PPP Problem (Clifford Kite)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Ury Segal)
Re: Interesting PPP Problem (solution) (Jack Beatty)
Re: Proxy Serving with PPP Dialup (Colin)
Re: AppleTalk on Linux (Toth Henrik)
Re: Route with ISA or PCI (Miguel Cruz)
tcgetattr deal
Re: Delaying at the sendmail initialization ("Dan Williams")
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Toth Henrik)
Re: dhcpcd fails to lease IP address (Mark)
ppp-2.3.6 and shadow passwd (Alain Gaspard)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:17:59 +0800
From: postmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Version of gcc?
you did not mention which kernel you're using, but if it is 2.0.36,
which comes with redhat 5.2, 3c590b is not supported. go to
http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/intel/rh52-hardware-intel-12.html
for the network cards supported.
for your question, gcc -v or gcc --version
Jason White wrote:
> I'm having trouble compiling my kernel for the network card I want to
> use (cCom 3c905b). I suspect part of the problem might be the version
> of the gcc I'm using. I can't remember what version it is from when I
> installed it. How can I find out and how can I upgrade it if need be?
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:20:18 +0800
From: postmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Version of gcc?
sorry for the typo, it should be 3c905b
postmaster wrote:
> you did not mention which kernel you're using, but if it is 2.0.36,
> which comes with redhat 5.2, 3c590b is not supported. go to
> http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/intel/rh52-hardware-intel-12.html
> for the network cards supported.
>
> for your question, gcc -v or gcc --version
>
> Jason White wrote:
>
> > I'm having trouble compiling my kernel for the network card I want to
> > use (cCom 3c905b). I suspect part of the problem might be the version
> > of the gcc I'm using. I can't remember what version it is from when I
> > installed it. How can I find out and how can I upgrade it if need be?
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:22:33 +0800
From: postmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Version of gcc?
sorry for the typo, it should be 3c905b
postmaster wrote:
> you did not mention which kernel you're using, but if it is 2.0.36,
> which comes with redhat 5.2, 3c590b is not supported. go to
> http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/intel/rh52-hardware-intel-12.html
> for the network cards supported.
>
> for your question, gcc -v or gcc --version
>
> Jason White wrote:
>
> > I'm having trouble compiling my kernel for the network card I want to
> > use (cCom 3c905b). I suspect part of the problem might be the version
> > of the gcc I'm using. I can't remember what version it is from when I
> > installed it. How can I find out and how can I upgrade it if need be?
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
------------------------------
From: gus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:33:21 +0000
I worked recently at a site where all the machines were named after asterix and obelix
characters.
There was getafix, caesar, cacophanix, statistix, unhygenix, asterix, obelix, dogmatix,
and the NT server was called boar.
gus
John R. Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:17:31 +0000, Rob Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I name my machines after rock groups, symphonic for the servers, whatever
> >> for the workstations. Hence I have genesis, yes, jethro (my own), zeppelin,
> >> asia, marillion and queen. I've also mixed some solo singers and local
> >> music artists from Venezuela.
> >
> >I did something similar, but I had stereolab, slint, heavenly, fridge,
> >cactopus, girlfrendo, hardvark, prolapse and so on, and no one had heard
> >of any of them!
>
> At our server lab we've got an interesting mix:
>
> Biblical names (adam, eve, cain, moses, sampson...)
> Mythical names (hercules...)
> Character names (tom, jerry, moe, larry...)
> Names from StarTrek (atoz...)
> Oddball Names (eithernet, stpeter...)
> Bird names (pelican...)
> Linux related (tuxedo because penguin was taken)
>
> and, in this room full of Unix/AIX boxes, our two NT servers
> have the monikers:
>
> ratbert
> rodney
>
> 'cuz there ain't NO way these puppies will get ANY respect.
>
> I'm planning on deploying names from Hitch-Hiker's guide to
> the Galaxy, Dr Who and Red Dwarf (we already have an M20
> named kryten, after all).
>
> --
> John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored!
> Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of John Campbell alone and
> do not reflect the opinions of his employer(s) or lackeys
> thereof. Anyone who says differently is itching for a fight!
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What is a "winmodem"?
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 21:34:38 -0600
Edward Lee wrote:
> Winmodem is not a bad idea by itself. Lack of driver is the problem.
Only if you have plenty of cpu power to spare to handle the
signal processing. Otherwise, you're still better off
having a hardware modem.
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Michael Kat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,cz.comp.linux,han.comp.linux
Subject: Re: ansi - iso standard c function definitions
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 23:42:40 +1100
Geoffrey C Trott wrote:
>
> visit http://members.aol.com/wantondeb
For a fair dinkum reputable C Standard Library reference, online and
free to use (not to download though), try here:
http://www.dinkumware.com/libc.html
Michael
------------------------------
From: "Icon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ethernet card IP setup in RedHat 5.2
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:06:11 GMT
Ethernet card IP setup in RedHat 5.2
I have 2 linux boxes at home. I installed RedHat 5.2 off of 2 differnet
CD-Roms. The first one works mint. The other one however is having problems
getting onto the internet.
The IP,DNS,subnet mask is OK. Default gateway is ok as well
After it boots up the eth0 is initialized and ifconfig shows all correct
info,,,except irq and DMA address which I am not sure what they are so I
tried 10 210-300 and it didn't change anything.
I can ping the static IP assigned to the card but nothing outside the box
includibg the default gateway nor the other box that is humming in the same
IP block connected to the same HUB.
The NIC is OK because the box is dula-booted into 95 and 95 is flying on the
net with it.
What else can I do????
If you have any suggestions please post them.
Thanks
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp problem!
Date: 17 Mar 1999 07:11:21 -0600
PaLLi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Ok once again another ppp problem, ok...ppp will not create the ppp
: link....i've always been able to connect to my isp but now suddenly i
: can't..puff..but can through windows and stuff...
: heres what ppp.log says...
<snip>
: Mar 9 05:08:51 landastrumpur pppd[153]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
: 0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Here pppd asks the ISP for an IP address to use, normal for a client unless
you've been given a static IP from the ISP.
: Mar 9 05:08:52 landastrumpur pppd[153]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x3 < 12 06 00
: 00 00 01> < 11 05 00 01 03> <bsd v1 12> <predictor 1>]
: Mar 9 05:08:52 landastrumpur pppd[153]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
: Mar 9 05:08:52 landastrumpur pppd[153]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x3 < 12 06 00
: 00 00 01> < 11 05 00 01 03>]
: Mar 9 05:08:52 landastrumpur pppd[153]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x4 <addr
: 0.0.0.0>]
Here the ISP asks pppd for it's IP address from pppd, not normal for
an ISP. This is the cause of the failure. MS clients probably work
because of MS support provided by the ISP - and the cheesy MS PPP
implementation.
You should be able to get connected by using a private IP address, e.g.,
192.168.0.1, in the pppd option for IP address thus:
192.168.0.1:
but no guarantee. In case you don't know about the IP address option you
can read about it in man pppd.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.networks
Subject: crossed cables for direct 10/100 base-T connections
From: Paul Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 17 Mar 1999 14:36:18 +0100
Hi Ho,
O.k., the problem i have is to connect two PC's directly, ethercard
to ethercard, no hub involved.
*If* i want 10baseT cables to do this it is ``easy''
you just cross the wires via:
RJ45 Plug 1 Tx+ -------------- Rx+ 3 RJ45 Plug
2 Tx- -------------- Rx- 6
3 Rx+ -------------- Tx+ 1
6 Rx- -------------- Tx- 2
100Base-T4 uses the same pins and should work the same way.
now here's the rub:
what do i do for 100Base-T8 (which uses pins 4-5, 1-2, 3-6, 7-8)?
I assume 1-2 and 3-6 will cross in the same way,
what do i do with 4-5 and 7-8.
Just thought i'd ask instead of using the "try'n'fry"
development paradigm.
thanks
--
Paul Knowles.
email: Paul (dot) Knowles SHIFT-2 unifr (dot) ch
finger me at pexppc33.unifr.ch for more contact information than you ever need
------------------------------
From: Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SNMP manager for linux
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 13:55:39 +0100
"Kim �rkenrud" wrote:
>
> Hi
> Is there any SNMP manager for linux.
> I'd like to graphically se my servers and routers and the status of them.
> Any suggestion?
> /Regards
> Kim
Try MRTG:
http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker/webtools/mrtg/mrtg.html
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
------------------------------
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: Version of gcc?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:57:38 -0600
I could be mistaken, but I believe that it simply tells you what version was
used to compile the kernel. Use dmesg, it is easier.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rick wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>the bootup will also tell you what version is installed. just check the
>/var/log/messages file
>
>Jason White wrote:
>
>> I'm having trouble compiling my kernel for the network card I want to
>> use (cCom 3c905b). I suspect part of the problem might be the version
>> of the gcc I'm using. I can't remember what version it is from when I
>> installed it. How can I find out and how can I upgrade it if need be?
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>
------------------------------
From: "TwinEngines Inc." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,linux.dev.ppp
Subject: Proxy Serving with PPP Dialup
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:10:07 -0500
I need to serve a small office with internet connectivity over a dial-up
line. I would like to configure auto-dial features in the event there is no
connection. I know I read an article on this in Linux Journal a waaaays
back - could anyone help me out on where some doc is on how to do this!
Thanks in advance.
John Scarborough
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diald rules to detect masq packets
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 14:15:01 +0000
Does anyone know if it would be possible to create a diald prule that
would detect if
a packet originated from a masqueraded host - and even better, which
host?
The idea is to be able to only bring up the link for certain hosts on my
lan, using ip.saddr
I can't seem to figure out what's going on with this.
Sometimes the diald filter packet matching output (debug 1) shows the
lan ip address (in the 192.168.1.0 net) and sometimes it shows my router
ip with the masquerading port number.
Thanx.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Interesting PPP Problem
Date: 17 Mar 1999 07:23:08 -0600
Jack Beatty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Like several other people in this news group, I'm having problems with PPP
: access to
<snip>
: SYSLOG ----------------
: Mar 16 23:37:30 linux_redhat pppd[536]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
: Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: timeout set to 90 seconds
Ah Ha! A clue already. A long chat timeout is set.
: Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
: Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
: Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: abort on
: (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
: Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: send (rAT^M)
: Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: expect (OK)
: Mar 16 23:37:50 linux_redhat chat[538]: rAT^M^M
: Mar 16 23:37:50 linux_redhat chat[538]: OK
: Mar 16 23:37:50 linux_redhat chat[538]: -- got it
This says it all. Doesn't 19 seconds between sending rAT^M and the arrival
of the OK seem strange?
The IRQ configured in Linux for the modem is not the same IRQ that the
modem uses. The IRQ is configured by setserial in one of the files in
/etc/rc.* - although with RH it may be somewhere else. You need to
find out what IRQ the modem actually uses and configure Linux for it.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
------------------------------
From: Ury Segal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 16:21:44 -0500
After a three year period with an ultra-ortodox system administrator, who named
the machines after the seven vowes taken by a marride couple ( yes ), I happily
named the machines after condoms, who have catchy, shot names any how.
So we have durex, trojan, fetherlite, etc.
gus wrote:
> I worked recently at a site where all the machines were named after asterix and
>obelix
> characters.
>
> There was getafix, caesar, cacophanix, statistix, unhygenix, asterix, obelix,
>dogmatix,
> and the NT server was called boar.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Jack Beatty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Interesting PPP Problem (solution)
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:19:34 -0500
Clifford Kite wrote:
> Jack Beatty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : Like several other people in this news group, I'm having problems with PPP
> : access to
>
> <snip>
>
> : SYSLOG ----------------
> : Mar 16 23:37:30 linux_redhat pppd[536]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> : Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: timeout set to 90 seconds
>
> Ah Ha! A clue already. A long chat timeout is set.
>
> : Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: abort on (\nBUSY\r)
> : Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: abort on (\nNO ANSWER\r)
> : Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: abort on
> : (\nRINGING\r\n\r\nRINGING\r)
>
> : Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: send (rAT^M)
> : Mar 16 23:37:31 linux_redhat chat[538]: expect (OK)
> : Mar 16 23:37:50 linux_redhat chat[538]: rAT^M^M
> : Mar 16 23:37:50 linux_redhat chat[538]: OK
> : Mar 16 23:37:50 linux_redhat chat[538]: -- got it
>
> This says it all. Doesn't 19 seconds between sending rAT^M and the arrival
> of the OK seem strange?
>
> The IRQ configured in Linux for the modem is not the same IRQ that the
> modem uses. The IRQ is configured by setserial in one of the files in
> /etc/rc.* - although with RH it may be somewhere else. You need to
> find out what IRQ the modem actually uses and configure Linux for it.
>
> --
> Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
> /* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
Voila!! I'm now responding to you from Linux. Thanks for the support. I had
originally thought it was an IRQ problem with my serial mouse which was on
/dev/cua0. When I changed it a PS/2 mouse and still had the problem I didn't
think about checking the actual IRQ. After checking the modem on the WINDOZE
side and running an upgrade utility I had for the modem, I found it to be
IRQ5. Used setserial to set it to IRQ 5 and presto, the problems are now an
ancient memory.
Thanks again Clifford! Not a guru, I think you are too modest.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,linux.dev.ppp
From: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Proxy Serving with PPP Dialup
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 10:05:26 -0500
If you used pppsetup, ppp-go -d should do it.
I put it in the rc.local on my slackware box
and it works fine.
Colin
--
Why gain the world but lose your soul?
Wisdom is much better than silver and gold.
}I need to serve a small office with internet connectivity over a dial-up
}line. I would like to configure auto-dial features in the event there is no
}connection. I know I read an article on this in Linux Journal a waaaays
}back - could anyone help me out on where some doc is on how to do this!
}
}Thanks in advance.
}
}John Scarborough
}mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
}
}
}
------------------------------
From: Toth Henrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: AppleTalk on Linux
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 15:46:01 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ->workstation. In the chooser i can see the Host, but the Mac dosen't
> ->recive a response from the server. Can anybody help me.
I experienced the same when I exceeded the allowed number (default: 5)
of connections in netatalk. The solution was "apfd -C number".
Of course if there is no machine which can connect, than something
else is the problem.
Maybe password handling, I would certainly try another package of
atalk, or try to compile it another way (there are lots of options).
Henrik
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.modems.cable
Subject: Re: Route with ISA or PCI
Date: 17 Mar 1999 15:21:54 GMT
Paul Newhouse <newhouse at rockhead dot com> wrote:
> My 3c509 is a PCI card. Or does it come in two flavors?
I am sitting here, contemplatively contemplating a half-height, 2/3-length
ISA card labeled 3C509B. It is dusty and worn, but I believe it still has
the power.
miguel
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tcgetattr deal
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:25:48 -0600
Hi,
Redhat 5.2 and PPP 2.3.6 are what I'm playing with. The modem is a US
robotics (of some kind...it's a 56K X2) I can't get the modem
to dial at all with anything, though it works in windows, and I've
checked that it's the right device with modemtool. The log always says
something like
input/output error pppd: tcgetattr(5)
I've recompiled my kernel, carefully checking to include support for
everything obvious (like...say...ppp), I've even upgraded from ppp 2.3.5
to 2.3.6.
I've seen suggestions posted like "change /etc/ppp/options" or "make sure
you do a full power down before booting linux". Nothing has helped me.
Does someone see anything totally obvious here? Has anyone fixed this
problem on their own machine?
Thanks for your help.
Rachel Flood
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Dan Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Delaying at the sendmail initialization
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 07:23:58 -0700
Change the first line of your /etc/hosts file to look like:
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain dilbert
Hope this helps
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Toth Henrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 15:26:20 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Character names (tom, jerry, moe, larry...)
I used characters from the Simpsons, choosing the right one
depending on the task of that PC.
So Homer is not working 24hours, in spite of Flanders, who
is my mailserver. The last one is Lisa, but I'm too supersticious
to use Bart for the next.
------------------------------
From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dhcpcd fails to lease IP address
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 09:31:14 -0500
Nadeem Ahmed wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to both of you for the your replies, but I have found out that the
> problem lies somewhere else.
>
> As mentioned by Edward I downloaded the dhcpcd update and installed it and
> ran it. I still got the DHCP failed error and ifconfig eth0 told me that no
> IP address was confiugred for that.
>
> The problem is with warm booting the machine from WinNT. i found this out
> from the nasa website where Donald becker keeps the drivers.
>
> If machine is cold booted (reset button or switching it off then on) DHCP
> successfully leases an address and configures the eth0 (even without -h
> option).
> If the machine is warm booted from WinNT (Shutdown and restart or
> CTRL+ALT+DEL after shutdown) then DHCP fails on booting Linux.
> This could happen even if the other OS is Win95 OSR2/Win98.
>
> Would appreciate if anybody knows why this could happen.
>
This is not a new phenomena. Warm booting a system does NOT clear out
everything. In basic troubleshooting of problems, I always recommend
to do a cold boot. This will reset all of the hardware.
(Worked on a NEC machine using NT. Warmboot it would consistently
refind the video card, but NOT the drivers. Cold boot, and all is
well. hmmm.)
Not sure why it happens this way (most likely the answer is long, detailed
and quite technical, so I don't need to know. (I'm not sleepy at the moment
<g>)
As long as there is a consistent fix, it becomes a non-problem. IMHO
Mark
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain Gaspard)
Subject: ppp-2.3.6 and shadow passwd
Date: 17 Mar 1999 15:54:44 GMT
by default ppp-2.3.6 is it to configure for the systems shadow password ?
on my server linux (slakware 2.0.36) the clients win95 do not connect
themselves
my /etc/ppp/options
ms-dns 192.168.1.3
auth
crtscts
lock
192.168.1.3:modem-16
modem
-detach
+pap
-chap
proxyarp
login
best regards
--
Alain Gaspard
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gaspard.net
ICQ # 4776135 IRC _AG_
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
