Linux-Networking Digest #549, Volume #10 Fri, 19 Mar 99 05:13:58 EST
Contents:
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (Burkard B. Kreidler)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (Bill Anderson)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (doole)
Re: For all you Microsoft lovers (now about security) (John R. Campbell)
Re: Modem: no luck w/simple AT cmd (brett russ)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers ("liam toh")
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (doole)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (mike)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers ("JR McConnell")
Re: jaz jet scsi / etherexpress pro IRQ problem... ("Frank Dziuba")
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (ken brakey)
Re: Tulip driver, with buildin 21143 controller. (Stephen Ashley)
Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2??? (Andy Johnstone)
Re: Fetchmail timeouts ("John Hardin")
Re: Even innocent people need privacy (Leo Cambilargiu)
DNS entry for dynamic IP address ("Terry Mathews")
pppd + linuxmandrake5.2 and HANGUP ("Benoit ASSERIN")
Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 (Andy Johnstone)
Re: V.90 ISA Modems!?!?! (Andrew Comech)
MPLS ("Eric Ho")
ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ??? ("��d�W")
Re: Sniffing for Linux on the wire (PC^God)
Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED? (DanH)
Re: telnetting machine, delay _after_ login (Matthias Pigulla)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Burkard B. Kreidler)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:59:00 GMT
>If you believe Microsofts answer/excuses, then you also believe in Santa
>Claus and the Tooth Fairy!
(OT)
Perhaps I believe in Santa Claus,
but never Billy's words
(/OT)
------------------------------
From: Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:59:48 GMT
doole wrote:
>
> Tim Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apparently said this:
> >
> >surely 'why not?' is an equally appropriate question here... and in many
> >cases you could replace the word 'need' with 'want' which is just as
> >valid.
> >
>
> If I'm a cop and I'm under all of those pressures and trying to get to
> some pervert, I don't give a crap what you want; I'm just trying to
> get the job done. Maybe I look in the wrong place once in a while. If
> I knew in advance where to look, we wouldn't be having these problems.
>
> And if I'm not a cop (and I'm not) I WANT him/her to get the job done.
>
> Don't you? I don't "want" the cops to be up against any more than they
> already are.
>
> Sorry, but I'm right.
wtf was that all about??
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (doole)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:59:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apparently said this:
>
>wtf was that all about??
<g> Not Linux, unfortunately. Time to get back to the point, I guess.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John R. Campbell)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Microsoft lovers (now about security)
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:45:38 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:44:24 GMT, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>doole writes:
>>Rufus V. Smith writes:
>>>The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>> From Authorities? Why??
>
>"Authorities" with a capital "A", eh? Who do you think these "Authorities"
>are, God? Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
>organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
>private files?
Perhaps, if there is no need for *any* form of privacy, we
should all send our messages via postcard, using the most
efficiently OCR'd font possible, so that the "Authorities"
know that we're knuckling under.
As for "Authorities", who do you trust? All organizations
that *I* know of are composed of human beings. If any of
them took an interest in me I would not like to have all of
my life open for examination...
Remember what McCarthy taught us all in the fifties- even
someone with a "clean" record can have it mis-interpreted
and twisted to suit an "Authorities" goals.
The Bill of Rights in the US isn't just a good idea- It's
the law (all of which are threatening to the "Powers that Be"
which explains why they are all threatened).
As for Linux, it'd be interesting to have a physical key (like
a PCMCIA slot in the front panel) for a PGP decryptor card so
that we can have encrypted filesystems, though I'd be concerned
that such a device can be "spoofed" (though an Open Source
environment is much like a "free society"- I can protect others
because I'm protecting myself).
Now...
Have I muddied the waters enough?
--
John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored!
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of John Campbell alone and
do not reflect the opinions of his employer(s) or lackeys
thereof. Anyone who says differently is itching for a fight!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brett russ)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Modem: no luck w/simple AT cmd
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:47:23 GMT
Finally got it last weekend. The problem was not that there was no
response, it was just so slow that I was giving up before the command
was printed and the response came back. It took about 30 secs. Once
I changed the modem to use COM3 instead of COM1 (/dev/ttyS2) and IRQ4
it worked like a charm. Thanks to those who helped.
BR
------------------------------
From: "liam toh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:59:46 GMT
>>doole wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
>>organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
>>private files?
>But I say it again, why would you care what they read - UNLESS of
>course, you were committing a crime. No one wants to answer that
>question directly, for some stupid reason.
sending email isn't a crime but I don't want just anybody rifling through
it, nobody I know wants 'authorities' peeping into their mail. Browsing
pornography isn't a crime but nobody I know want 'authorities' to make it
their business to monitor someone's browsing activities. Actually screwing
my wife isn't a crime but we don't want the 'authorities' to have a camera
in our bedroom.
>You send loads of your private information to the IRS, and willingly.
>Why the hell isn't anyone complaining about THAT?
people are complaining, maybe you've heard of the republican party?
>Doesn't make sense.
??you think people in a free society dont cherish there personal privacy??
BTW doole: do you work for the IRS?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (doole)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:59:17 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apparently said this:
>"Authorities" with a capital "A", eh?
Don't be reading too much from my typing skills.
>Who do you think these "Authorities"
>are, God? Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
>organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
>private files?
Don't get me wrong. I CERTAINLY don't think "Authorities" are God. In
fact, in most cases, they seem to be kind of screwed up.
But I say it again, why would you care what they read - UNLESS of
course, you were committing a crime. No one wants to answer that
question directly, for some stupid reason.
You send loads of your private information to the IRS, and willingly.
Why the hell isn't anyone complaining about THAT?
Doesn't make sense.
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:47:47 GMT
My rental building complex wants to save money and not fix
the intercom and door buzzer. They want to hijack all the
phone lines in the building and run them through
a general intercom-buzzer system. When some one rings I will
be bounced off line. Who knows what else they can decide
to do with those lines.
Do people have any rights of privacy any more.!
I heard that police agencies can follow a suspect until
they somehow leave a trace of their DNA and take it. Like
a glass or plate or knife or fork in a restaurant or a hair.
or from a napkin or tissue. What if you happen to
throw some gum in a public garbage can or spit. Soon you
whole genetic info like health prognosis is open to anyone
like prespective employers .......
Where will it all end???
Mike
------------------------------
From: "JR McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:50:03 GMT
mike wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>My rental building complex wants to save money and not fix
>the intercom and door buzzer. They want to hijack all the
>phone lines in the building and run them through
>a general intercom-buzzer system. When some one rings I will
>be bounced off line. Who knows what else they can decide
>to do with those lines.
> Do people have any rights of privacy any more.!
> I heard that police agencies can follow a suspect until
>they somehow leave a trace of their DNA and take it. Like
>a glass or plate or knife or fork in a restaurant or a hair.
>or from a napkin or tissue. What if you happen to
>throw some gum in a public garbage can or spit. Soon you
>whole genetic info like health prognosis is open to anyone
>like prespective employers .......
> Where will it all end???
> Mike
Personaly, If one would wish to wast the money and resources to fret
over little ol' me then they are more than welcome to. Better yet, just send
the money to me personaly and I will be willing to save them the leg work
and spill my guts about my boring, simple little life...
Make all checks payable to....
The number of people in this world makes it almost impossable to pick
any person out just for the fun of it, the goverment is like a sleeping
dragon. Unless one is fool enough to wake to ones existance there is little
need to worry about it even caring you exist. Life is masured by thoes
around you not thoes that never knew you...
Sorry, just my 2 cents worth, and it is not even worth that much. :)
------------------------------
From: "Frank Dziuba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: jaz jet scsi / etherexpress pro IRQ problem...
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:50:55 GMT
No good. Neither device lets you set the IRQ because they are both PNP PCI
cards
Bob Martin wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Check the software that came with your cards, see if there is a DOS
>configure utility. If there is , boot using a DOS boot disk, use the
utility
>to set card to what you want, then reboot linux. I have found the DOS
>utilities for some cards is the only to get them configured correctly.
>
>Frank Dziuba wrote:
>
>> I have Red Hat 5.1 with a year old IOMega Jaz Jet SCSI card and an Intel
>> Etherexpress pro 100+ card.
>>
>> Both cards hook IRQ 10, and both are detected at boot. No errors are
>> reported at boot.
>>
>> But, the ethernet card doesn't work unless I remove the Advansys based
>> SCSI card. Is there any way to change the SCSI card IRQ? Or Intel IRQ?
>>
>> They work under Windows ok.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> frank
>
------------------------------
From: ken brakey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:43:11 GMT
SEE! I'm NOT paranoid! THEY ARE out to get me! :)
ken
John Hasler wrote:
> Rufus V. Smith writes:
> >The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>
> doole writes:
> > From Authorities? Why??
>
> "Authorities" with a capital "A", eh? Who do you think these "Authorities"
> are, God? Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
> organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
> private files?
> --
> John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.
> Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
> Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
------------------------------
From: Stephen Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Tulip driver, with buildin 21143 controller.
Date: 19 Mar 1999 07:56:13 GMT
Hi there,
No it did not. I have been just waiting to see if any more replys come in. I have
go my system going with a DE450 10Mhz card. But due to my sites UTP wiring
standards I have had to create a butched cable wall cable. Its a long story, anyhow
I would real like to get the on board controller to work. This way I will have a
much better chance of converting the other users system here, off NT and Over to
linux.
I was planning to send a mail message to [Donald Becker] and/or other on the tulip
development site to see if I can get some assistance, and what I need to feed back
to them.
Do you mind if I ask what your interest is in this, can you suggest other coursers
of action?
Cheers,
Stephen Ashley.
=========
Tiger wrote:
> Stephen Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> the latest tulip driver solved your problem or not?
>
> >Yer. I did get the latest tulip driver dated the 24-Feb-'99. re-compiled as per
> >my orignal posting.
>
> >Cheers,
> >Stephen,
> >Alice Springs,
> >Out Back Oz.
>
------------------------------
From: Andy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2???
Date: 19 Mar 1999 08:44:14 GMT
I've also had this. it said, loading linux and reboot immediatly. If you DO
have a clean source rerun your configuration, and turn off all hardware
'bugfixes.' Chances are you won't have the bugs they fix anyway. Once i did
that, it booted fine. Hope it helps
Andy
Tiger wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin) writes:
>
> [deleted]
>
> >>I compiled the kernel, removed static links to linux, I have made the
> >>modules, made the modules_install.
> >>I have moved the zImage to /boot.
> >>When I reboot and try to boot the new kernel, it causes a total system
> >>reboot..
>
> >Did you erase the source code that you had there before you installed the
> >new source code?
>
> Right, the new kernel 2.2.x code must be installed in a new directory
> (defult is /usr/src/linux) from the previous version source, which is
> /usr/src/linux-2.0.36. To do so, before installing new kernel source:
>
> # rm /usr/src/linux
>
> After installing kernel new source code (say version 2.2.3):
>
> # mv /usr/src/linux /usr/src/linux-2.2.3
> # ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.2.3 /usr/src/linux
>
> Good luck.
>
> --
>
> ("\''/").___..--''"`-._
> \ `9_ 9 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
> \ /\ (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( ) _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' .'
> .( o ). (il).-'' ((i).' ((!.-'
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fetchmail timeouts
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:21:43 -0800
Nik Jewell wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Here are the details:
>
>fetchmail -V reports:
>This is fetchmail release 4.5.8
The current version of Fetchmail is 4.7.9 - you might try upgrading.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight... (with apologies to Robert Johns)
------------------------------
From: Leo Cambilargiu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Even innocent people need privacy
Date: 19 Mar 1999 08:40:20 GMT
I agree with this idea COMPLETELY. If the idea that people do wrong is a
good enough excuse to violate our privacy, and the attitude that if we do
nothing wrong is an excuse for us not to complain, then the violation of
our privacy has nothing to do with being right or wrong. Just someone
elses interest.
The minds behind the observation systems are simply motivated by self
interest, regardless of right or wrong. If you toss money at the man, he
will jump straight into bed.
LCamBilARgiu
On Fri, 19 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's this attitude that if you're not doing anything wrong, then you
> shouldn't worry about lack of privacy. That's wrong; here are examples.
>
> - Do you want potential thieves to know that you're going on vacation?
> Do you want them to be able to find what alarm company you subscribe to,
> if any?
>
> - Do you want your competitor to know about the product you're developing,
> or the employee you're thinking of hiring? In fact, executives who
> fly private planes are now bitching about a public database that lets you
> type in the number of a plane and retrieve its current flight path.
>
> - Are you so sure that you're innocent? Here's what local police often
> do to trap men in alleged rape cases. The woman says it was rape; the man
> says it was consensual. The police are quite sympathetic to the man, and
> ask him to describe what actually happened, in great detail. Then they
> charge him with sodomy in addition to rape. Since he admitted to sodomy,
> which is often still illegal but few people know that, he hasn't a chance,
> even if the sex was consensual.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Terry Mathews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS entry for dynamic IP address
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 22:20:07 -0500
Here's the scoop. I want to put this Linux box (Red Hat 5.2) on a static IP
address as an Internet server, e-mail server, yadda yadda yadda. Here's the
trick. I'd like to be able to have 2 computers log into the machine and have
them assigned DNS names. Both machines connect to the internet via modems
and get dynamic ip addresses. They aren't in the same subnet as the server
will be. Is there a way to do this. For example, I'd like to name my server
"terry.enon.oh.us" at IP 145.1.2.3 (These are fake numbers) (I'll get the
.us name assigned after I have the hardware working.) and the 2 computers
cheetah assigned "cheetah.terry.enon.oh.us" with IP address of 123.4.5.6 and
"tiger.terry.enon.oh.us" with IP address of 123.4.5.7. Is this possible?
Please respond via e-mail. Thank you.
Terry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Benoit ASSERIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd + linuxmandrake5.2 and HANGUP
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:44:03 +0100
Hello
I use the linux mandrake 5.2 and i have a problem with
my pppd deamon and my connection to the net
my modem is an Euroviva 33.6 SP,
my connexion script look like this:
#!/bin/sh
pppd connect 'chat -v "" ATZ OK ATDT0155400040 CONNECT "" ogin:
clubint/basserin word: 4abc39z ' /dev/modem 115200 debug crtscts
defaultroute 0.0.0.0:
I have the good name servers in resolv.conf
but if i type ifconfig, i have no lines with the "ppp0" stuff.
the log file when i try it look like this:
#debug informations
Mar 19 09:06:30 blue syslogd 1.3-3: restart.
Mar 19 09:06:39 blue pppd[482]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Mar 19 09:06:40 blue chat[483]: send (ATZ^M)
Mar 19 09:06:40 blue chat[483]: expect (OK)
Mar 19 09:06:41 blue chat[483]: ATZ^M^M
Mar 19 09:06:41 blue chat[483]: OK
Mar 19 09:06:41 blue chat[483]: -- got it
Mar 19 09:06:41 blue chat[483]: send (ATDT0155400040^M)
Mar 19 09:06:41 blue chat[483]: expect (CONNECT)
Mar 19 09:06:41 blue chat[483]: ^M
Mar 19 09:06:58 blue chat[483]: ATDT0155400040^M^M
Mar 19 09:06:58 blue chat[483]: CONNECT
Mar 19 09:06:58 blue chat[483]: -- got it
Mar 19 09:06:58 blue chat[483]: send (^M)
Mar 19 09:06:58 blue chat[483]: expect (ogin:)
Mar 19 09:06:58 blue chat[483]: 115200^M
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: ^M
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: Login:
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: -- got it
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: send (clubint/basserin^M)
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: expect (word:)
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: clubint/basserin^M
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: Password:
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: -- got it
Mar 19 09:07:00 blue chat[483]: send (4abc39z^M)
Mar 19 09:07:01 blue pppd[482]: Serial connection established.
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: Using interface ppp0
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0x746032b>
<pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xc0ab29ea> <pcomp> <accomp> <auth pap>]
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 <auth pap>]
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <auth chap 05> <magic 0xc0ab29ea> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <auth chap 05>]
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xc0ab29ea> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 19 09:07:02 blue pppd[482]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <mru 1500>
<asyncmap 0x0> <magic 0xc0ab29ea> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 19 09:07:05 blue pppd[482]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic 0x746032b>
<pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 19 09:07:05 blue pppd[482]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <magic 0x746032b>
<pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 19 09:07:05 blue pppd[482]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
129.198.12.4> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Mar 19 09:07:32 blue last message repeated 9 times
Mar 19 09:07:35 blue pppd[482]: IPCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Mar 19 09:07:35 blue pppd[482]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2 "No network
protocols running"]
Mar 19 09:07:35 blue pppd[482]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x4]
Mar 19 09:07:35 blue pppd[482]: Connection terminated.
Mar 19 09:07:35 blue pppd[482]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Mar 19 09:07:35 blue pppd[482]: Exit.
I think i have miss something in my script but i don't know
what....
Anybody have an idea
Thanks a lot
cheers
Benoit
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Andy Johnstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10
Date: 19 Mar 1999 08:44:43 GMT
Hi all,
I'm trying to get my ethernet card working with linux. I have to some
extent, I found a semi-supported .c file as a driver written for it.
The driver worked, under kernel 2.0.36. However, i can't get it to
compile under 2.2.1. Does anyone have any suggestions? I get errors
like SLOW_DOWN_IO not defined, dev_tint not declared, etc. Maybe
someone that knows about drivers can fix it? I tried, but I know too
little about network drivers to understand how I need to fix it. If
anyone is interested email me.
Thanks!
Andy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Remove the nospam. to email me
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: V.90 ISA Modems!?!?!
Date: 19 Mar 1999 08:44:31 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am using an AOpen FM56-ITU (isa) modem with RedHat5.2. This was the
> easiest thing to setup. All I had to do was set the jumper to com2
Lying, old man! That modem is preconfigured to use COM2, IRQ3!
Cheers,
Andrew
------------------------------
From: "Eric Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MPLS
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 16:41:03 +0800
Just wonder if anyone is working on a MPLS implementation?
Cheers,
eh
------------------------------
From: "��d�W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: hk.comp.os.linux,hk.comp.pc
Subject: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ???
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 17:30:20 +0800
Before, I haven't build the kernel.
I need to prepare the file /etc/conf.modules:
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=0x300
alias eth1 3c59x
And today, I try to build the kernel.
I have chosen the [Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000 support.
So, I won't got this two modules(ne.o and 3c59x.o) any more during building.
Then, the problem happened !!!
On starting:
...
Enable IPv4 packet forwarding.
modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
...
eth1: unknown interface. (NE2000 NIC change from eth0 to eth1)
modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
What's more, I try to copy back the files:
ne.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/ne.o
3c59x.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o
Then the system report:
...
modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o: kernel module version mismatch
/lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o was compiled for kernel version
2.0.36 while this kernel is version 2.2.3.
eht1: unknown interface.
modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
...
What should I do now, is that supports been compiled to kernel yet ???
I have chosen [Y] for these 2 NIC support already !!!
Would you please offer your Kindly Help ?
------------------------------
From: PC^God <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sniffing for Linux on the wire
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:27:59 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Dude wrote:
>
> I'm in a situation where they are sniffing for Linux workstations and
> booting them. Is it possible to identify Linux boxes from sniffing the wire,
> If so how?.
>
There are several methods of determining which OS you are running. One
of the simplest is a port scan. Another method that can be more prosice
is TCP/IP stack fingerprinting. This method examines the behavior of the
TCP stack for certin inputs. This combined with a port scan can give you
the version (to a few kernel revisions of linux) of an operating system
a person is running.
-- PC^God --
------------------------------
From: DanH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix
Subject: Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:39:31 +0000
Reggie wrote:
>
> I checked my logs today as I do everyday and the old logs have been
> renamed with a ".1" extension and the new logs are empty. Is this
> evidence of a security breach, or was it caused by a normal process.
No, you're running Linux and there's a cron that is called "logrotate".
Poke around your system under /etc/cron.xxx
{hourly|daily|weekly|monthly} and see what you come up with.
Dan
------------------------------
From: Matthias Pigulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnetting machine, delay _after_ login
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 10:54:23 +0100
Matthias Pigulla wrote:
> I've got some problems telnetting to a host over the network. _After_ I
> entered my login name and password, there's a 60 seconds delay before I
> get my shell prompt. The same occurs after su'ing root (and entering the
> password).
I just found out there's another long delay when adding users - it takes
the useradd command a long time to return.
When I add a user with "/bin/false" as shell, the login delay also
occurs - I think this might indicate that the delay is not somehow
related to the shell, maybe due to any lookup done in the shell
configuration or whatever.
Matthias
--
w e b f a c t o r y | matthias pigulla
www.webfactory.de [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
