Linux-Networking Digest #556, Volume #10 Fri, 19 Mar 99 14:17:15 EST
Contents:
3C509 problem solved -read here!!! ("Oliver Weiss")
Linux Box <-> Win95 Machine ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ??? (Enbugger)
Re: For all you Microsoft lovers (now about security) (John R. Campbell)
Teles 16.3c ISDN card + kernel 2.0.36 (John Wong)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers ("Rufus V. Smith")
Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 PCI card (Vincent Cunniffe)
Re: Modem: no luck w/simple AT cmd (brett russ)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (Bill Anderson)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (mike)
Re: Sometimes Netscape mail won't word wrap... (Manish Godara)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers ("JR McConnell")
Re: jaz jet scsi / etherexpress pro IRQ problem... ("Frank Dziuba")
Re: NETGEAR ("Michael Lindbeck")
Teles 16.3c ISDN card + kernel 2.0.36 (JALinuxUser)
Cardbus ethernet ActionTec FastNet PRO 10/100 (Claudio Morgia)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (Richard Steiner)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (ken brakey)
Re: Tulip driver, with buildin 21143 controller. (Tiger)
Re: Which SMP Motherboard? (Daniel Tisserand)
Re: Tulip driver, with buildin 21143 controller. ("Dr. Yuan Liu")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Oliver Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 3C509 problem solved -read here!!!
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:35:25 -0500
I recently set up networking on my machine. After I installed a 3C509
Ethernet adapter, I ran into the following problem:
- I set up all the routes and IP's correctly
- I could ping the machine itself
- I could ping localhost.
- I could NOT ping anything else on the network.
This puzzled me for a week. I read every singe HOWTO on networking that I
could get. Nothing helped. Then I read on Dejanews that someone recommended
turning off Plug-n-Play on the machine. That did the trick.
Please note: a lot of newbies like me have no idea that Plug-n-Play may
cause this problem. I understand that, if you came all the way with Linux,
you know this is a given, but if whoever keeps track of these things could
make a note that PnP is problematic, that would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Oliver
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Box <-> Win95 Machine
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:29:06 GMT
Hello folks. I would like to know if anyone could give me ideas on the best
way to hook my laptop (win95) up to my desktop (redhat 5.1). The laptop is
actually my school's computer, so I couldn't make any major changes to it. It
currently has a Xircom CreditCard Ethernet Adapter 10/100 installed in it
which I use to connect to my school's network. The linux box doesn't have a
network card, but I could probably purchase one if necessary (and
affordable).
I would like to do more than just share files. I'm experimenting with network
programming, and would like to be able to connect these as client/server
machines. I've been using computers for a fairly long time, so a general
explanation would suffice, I just have not dealt with networking as of yet.
Thanks for your help!
Eric
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Enbugger <enbugger@usa./NO-SPAM/net>
Crossposted-To: hk.comp.os.linux,hk.comp.pc
Subject: Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ???
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 00:37:20 +0800
Have you re-built the initrd image by using
mkinitrd ?
If you have set
[Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000
[Y] Enable IPv4 packet forwarding
when building the kernel, they are already
compiled into the kernel image.
You can check the eth drivers by
dmesg |grep eth
Can you actually use the ethernet by running the
new kernel?
HTH
"��d�W" wrote:
>
> I have done this la !
>
> Enbugger ���g��峹 <7ctncl$l52$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I am not sure if you are using RedHat.
> >If you are, please refer to this document for
> >version 2.2 kernel upgrade:
> >
> >http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/kernel-2.2/kernel2.2-upgrade.html
> >
> >Hints:
> >Have you done:
> > make modules
> >and
> > make modules_install
> >?
> >
> >"��d�W" wrote:
> >>
> >> Before, I haven't build the kernel.
> >> I need to prepare the file /etc/conf.modules:
> >>
> >> alias eth0 ne
> >> options ne io=0x300
> >> alias eth1 3c59x
> >>
> >> And today, I try to build the kernel.
> >> I have chosen the [Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000 support.
> >> So, I won't got this two modules(ne.o and 3c59x.o) any more during
> building.
> >> Then, the problem happened !!!
> >> On starting:
> >> ...
> >> Enable IPv4 packet forwarding.
> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> ...
> >> eth1: unknown interface. (NE2000 NIC change from eth0 to eth1)
> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >>
> >> What's more, I try to copy back the files:
> >> ne.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/ne.o
> >> 3c59x.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o
> >>
> >> Then the system report:
> >> ...
> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o: kernel module version mismatch
> >> /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o was compiled for kernel
> version
> >> 2.0.36 while this kernel is version 2.2.3.
> >> eht1: unknown interface.
> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> ...
> >>
> >> What should I do now, is that supports been compiled to kernel yet ???
> >> I have chosen [Y] for these 2 NIC support already !!!
> >> Would you please offer your Kindly Help ?
> >
> >--
> >Enbugger
> >
> >p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
--
Enbugger
p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John R. Campbell)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Microsoft lovers (now about security)
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:47:46 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:44:24 GMT, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>doole writes:
>>Rufus V. Smith writes:
>>>The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>> From Authorities? Why??
>
>"Authorities" with a capital "A", eh? Who do you think these "Authorities"
>are, God? Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
>organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
>private files?
Perhaps, if there is no need for *any* form of privacy, we
should all send our messages via postcard, using the most
efficiently OCR'd font possible, so that the "Authorities"
know that we're knuckling under.
As for "Authorities", who do you trust? All organizations
that *I* know of are composed of human beings. If any of
them took an interest in me I would not like to have all of
my life open for examination...
Remember what McCarthy taught us all in the fifties- even
someone with a "clean" record can have it mis-interpreted
and twisted to suit an "Authorities" goals.
The Bill of Rights in the US isn't just a good idea- It's
the law (all of which are threatening to the "Powers that Be"
which explains why they are all threatened).
As for Linux, it'd be interesting to have a physical key (like
a PCMCIA slot in the front panel) for a PGP decryptor card so
that we can have encrypted filesystems, though I'd be concerned
that such a device can be "spoofed" (though an Open Source
environment is much like a "free society"- I can protect others
because I'm protecting myself).
Now...
Have I muddied the waters enough?
--
John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored!
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of John Campbell alone and
do not reflect the opinions of his employer(s) or lackeys
thereof. Anyone who says differently is itching for a fight!
------------------------------
From: John Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Teles 16.3c ISDN card + kernel 2.0.36
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:48:07 GMT
Hi,
Anybody got a Teles 16.3c ISA PnP ISDN card working with
Linux kernel 2.0.36??
I've compiled the ISDN subsystem as a module...
HiSax drivers as modules... here's the relevant section in
the .config file...
CONFIG_ISDN=m
CONFIG_ISDN_PPP=y
CONFIG_ISDN_PPP_VJ=y
CONFIG_ISDN_MPP=y
CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_LOOP=m
CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_HISAX=m
CONFIG_HISAX_EURO=y
CONFIG_HISAX_16_0=y
CONFIG_HISAX_16_3=y
CONFIG_HISAX_TELES3C=y
CONFIG_HISAX_TELESPCI=y
CONFIG_HISAX_S0BOX=y
Booted with this kernel... got isapnp to load the following isapnp.conf..
(CONFIGURE TAG2620/209717183 (LD 0
(IO 0 (SIZE 2) (BASE 0x0300))
(INT 0 (IRQ 10 (MODE +E)))
(NAME "TAG2620/209717183[0]{TELES.S0/16.3c Plug&Play}")
(ACT Y)
))
ran isapnp and got ...
Board 1 has Identity 76 04 03 02 01 00 20 32 0d: CIR2000 Serial No 67305985 [checksum
76]
Board 2 has Identity bd 0c 80 07 bf 20 26 27 50: TAG2620 Serial No 209717183
[checksum bd]
TAG2620/209717183[0]{TELES.S0/16.3c Plug&Play}: Port 0x300; IRQ10 --- Enabled OK
BUT when i tried to load the HiSax modules by modprobe... i
got the following errors...
# modprobe hisax type=14 protocol=2 io=0x300 irq=10
Initialization of hisax failed
Initialization of hisax failed
ISDN subsystem Rev: 1.44.2.9/1.41.2.11/1.48.2.27/1.28.2.2/none loaded
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 1
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 2
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 3
HiSax: Card Teles 16.3c not installed !
Initialization of hisax failed
ISDN-subsystem unloaded
What could be the problem? any ideas?
regards,
John Wong
------------------------------
From: "Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:54:35 -0500
(in a flame fanning mood..)
What if you are the second spouse of the ex-spouse of a jealous
police officer or IRS agent (or Microsoft/Intel employee)?
Or your pissed-off ex-spouse remarries one?
Richard Steiner wrote in message <7csv6d$iap$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Here in comp.os.linux.setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (doole) spake unto us,
saying:
>
>>"Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apparently said this:
>>
>>>The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>>
>>From Authorities? Why??
>
>What happens if that Authority decides to use your information in a
>manner which harms you? Or if someone else steals that information
>from that Authority?
>
>Blind trust can be foolish.
>
------------------------------
From: Vincent Cunniffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 PCI card
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:49:06 GMT
> I saw the same type of behavior last night on my RH5.2 system. I ended
> up having to load the eepro100.o module (insmod eepro100.o), then run
> Linuxconf, verify that the Ip, GW, mask, etc were correct and exit and
> 'activate changes'.
>
> It's been running fine (I have the same type of NIC - Intel PCI) since
> then. I have to find out how/where to add the insmod eepro100.o line
> (and a couple other fs lines) so they happen automatically at boot up.
/etc/rc.d/rc3/rc.local
Regards,
Vin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brett russ)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Modem: no luck w/simple AT cmd
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:49:29 GMT
Finally got it last weekend. The problem was not that there was no
response, it was just so slow that I was giving up before the command
was printed and the response came back. It took about 30 secs. Once
I changed the modem to use COM3 instead of COM1 (/dev/ttyS2) and IRQ4
it worked like a charm. Thanks to those who helped.
BR
------------------------------
From: Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:49:31 GMT
Chris Tremblay wrote:
>
> If you think that you had privacy before this, boy you live in a
> bubble. Look at cell phones, ISPs, Credit card companies, Banks.
>
> Cell phone companies can tell what block you are standing on and what
> you are saying. This info is accessible by police.
Come back from the sci-fi channel, and rejoin reality.
> ISP companies can log every email that you send out and where you
> visit on the net.
can != do
Most *ISP*s don't give a rip to track you unless they are given reason
to.
Do you have any idea what kind of storage would be required to track all
that.
get a grip.
> Credit card companies have logs of what you buy and where you buy it.
> They can sell this to other companies
For those that use credit cards this is rather obvious.
> Banks are in the same situation as credit card companies, especially
> if you have debit card access.
> Privacy is a nonissue. It is more of can you accept that this is
> there.
Spoken like a true tyrant.
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:49:50 GMT
My rental building complex wants to save money and not fix
the intercom and door buzzer. They want to hijack all the
phone lines in the building and run them through
a general intercom-buzzer system. When some one rings I will
be bounced off line. Who knows what else they can decide
to do with those lines.
Do people have any rights of privacy any more.!
I heard that police agencies can follow a suspect until
they somehow leave a trace of their DNA and take it. Like
a glass or plate or knife or fork in a restaurant or a hair.
or from a napkin or tissue. What if you happen to
throw some gum in a public garbage can or spit. Soon you
whole genetic info like health prognosis is open to anyone
like prespective employers .......
Where will it all end???
Mike
------------------------------
From: Manish Godara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,alt.netscape.buggy-products
Subject: Re: Sometimes Netscape mail won't word wrap...
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:26:56 +0000
Edit->preferences->Mail & Newsgroup -> Messages -> Message Wrapping
click the button and specify the width of line after which you
desire the wrap-around.
hope this helps
- manish
Jon Slater wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention I'm using UNIX Netscape 4.5 under Sun OS.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Jon Slater wrote:
> >
> > I get e-mail from some people that won't word wrap.
> >
> > A single paragraph is one long line. I have to scroll to the right to
> > be able to read the end of the lines.
> >
> > Is there a setting I'm missing?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Jon
> > --
> > Jon D. Slater QualComm Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6150 Lookout Road
> > Phone: (303) 247-5037 Boulder, Colorado
> > Fax: (303) 247-5167 80301
------------------------------
From: "JR McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:51:39 GMT
mike wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>My rental building complex wants to save money and not fix
>the intercom and door buzzer. They want to hijack all the
>phone lines in the building and run them through
>a general intercom-buzzer system. When some one rings I will
>be bounced off line. Who knows what else they can decide
>to do with those lines.
> Do people have any rights of privacy any more.!
> I heard that police agencies can follow a suspect until
>they somehow leave a trace of their DNA and take it. Like
>a glass or plate or knife or fork in a restaurant or a hair.
>or from a napkin or tissue. What if you happen to
>throw some gum in a public garbage can or spit. Soon you
>whole genetic info like health prognosis is open to anyone
>like prespective employers .......
> Where will it all end???
> Mike
Personaly, If one would wish to wast the money and resources to fret
over little ol' me then they are more than welcome to. Better yet, just send
the money to me personaly and I will be willing to save them the leg work
and spill my guts about my boring, simple little life...
Make all checks payable to....
The number of people in this world makes it almost impossable to pick
any person out just for the fun of it, the goverment is like a sleeping
dragon. Unless one is fool enough to wake to ones existance there is little
need to worry about it even caring you exist. Life is masured by thoes
around you not thoes that never knew you...
Sorry, just my 2 cents worth, and it is not even worth that much. :)
------------------------------
From: "Frank Dziuba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: jaz jet scsi / etherexpress pro IRQ problem...
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:52:15 GMT
No good. Neither device lets you set the IRQ because they are both PNP PCI
cards
Bob Martin wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Check the software that came with your cards, see if there is a DOS
>configure utility. If there is , boot using a DOS boot disk, use the
utility
>to set card to what you want, then reboot linux. I have found the DOS
>utilities for some cards is the only to get them configured correctly.
>
>Frank Dziuba wrote:
>
>> I have Red Hat 5.1 with a year old IOMega Jaz Jet SCSI card and an Intel
>> Etherexpress pro 100+ card.
>>
>> Both cards hook IRQ 10, and both are detected at boot. No errors are
>> reported at boot.
>>
>> But, the ethernet card doesn't work unless I remove the Advansys based
>> SCSI card. Is there any way to change the SCSI card IRQ? Or Intel IRQ?
>>
>> They work under Windows ok.
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> frank
>
------------------------------
From: "Michael Lindbeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NETGEAR
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 09:50:38 -0800
Howdy,
I have that specific hardware (Netgear hub and 2 NICs). I also
purchased another Netgear NIC (FA 310TX) and have an older 3COM ISA Card for
a machine that dosn't have a PCI slot.
When I first installed Red Had 5.1, I chose the DEC 21040-family
ethernet driver (tulip.c) and it didn't actually work untill I replaced it
with the tulip.c driver from the Netgear floppy.
Works like a champ. Good luck and happy networking.
michael
Joseph White wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>HI ALL,
>
>I'm thinking of buying a four port hub and a couple of NIC's so I can
>setup a Linux server w/Samba.
>Netgear by Bay Networks has some good deals, but I don't know if their
>products work with Linux. I'm running Redhat 5.1 - Intel, I read the
>hardware list, but could not determine from the list if Netgear products
>were supported or not.
>
>If anyone has info on Netgear or any other economical solutions for a
>small home network, please let me know.
>
>
>Thanks
------------------------------
From: JALinuxUser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Teles 16.3c ISDN card + kernel 2.0.36
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:53:25 GMT
Hi,
Wonder if any of u can help me out with a little problem i'm
having with my Teles ISDN card & Linux...
I can't seem to get the kernel to recognize the interrupt
i've set for the card... here's the details..
I'm using kernel 2.0.36 and a Teles 16.3c ISA PnP card...
Here's the relevant section of my /usr/src/linux/.config :-
=========================================
CONFIG_MODULES=y
CONFIG_ISDN=m
CONFIG_ISDN_PPP=y
CONFIG_ISDN_PPP_VJ=y
CONFIG_ISDN_MPP=y
CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_LOOP=m
CONFIG_ISDN_DRV_HISAX=m
CONFIG_HISAX_EURO=y
CONFIG_HISAX_16_0=y
CONFIG_HISAX_16_3=y
CONFIG_HISAX_TELES3C=y
CONFIG_HISAX_TELESPCI=y
CONFIG_HISAX_S0BOX=y
=========================================
I've compiled the ISDN subsystem as a module and also the HiSax drivers
for Teles 16xx all as modules.
Booted up with the new kernel
Here's my /etc/isapnp.conf file :-
=========================================
(READPORT 0x0203)
(ISOLATE PRESERVE)
(IDENTIFY *)
(VERBOSITY 2)
(CONFLICT (IO FATAL)(IRQ FATAL)(DMA FATAL)(MEM FATAL)) # or WARNING
(CONFIGURE TAG2620/209717183 (LD 0
(IO 0 (SIZE 2) (BASE 0x0300))
(INT 0 (IRQ 10 (MODE +E)))
(NAME "TAG2620/209717183[0]{TELES.S0/16.3c Plug&Play}")
(ACT Y)
))
(WAITFORKEY)
=========================================
Did an "isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf" and got the following :-
========================================= lspci not found, so PCI resource
conflict not checked Board 1 has Identity bd 0c 80 07 bf 20 26 27 50:
TAG2620 Serial No 209717183 [checksum bd] TAG2620/209717183[0]{TELES.S0/16.3c
Plug&Play}: Port 0x300; IRQ10 --- Enabled OK
=========================================
OK.. no problem so far... then i did the modprobe hisax like this and
got the results as follows:-
=========================================
# modprobe hisax type=14 protocol=2 irq=10 io=0x300
ISDN subsystem Rev: 1.44.2.9/1.41.2.11/1.48.2.27/none/none loaded
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 1
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 2
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 3
HiSax: Card Teles 16.3c not installed !
Initialization of hisax failed
ISDN-subsystem unloaded
=========================================
Something's not right here... can't pinpoint exactly where it is... tried
putting the card to another PC but got the same results... MAYBE it could
be the card being faulty OR something else... hope u can help out here..
Thanx ;) ;)
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Claudio Morgia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Cardbus ethernet ActionTec FastNet PRO 10/100
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:51:57 GMT
I have an ActionTec FastNet PRO 10/100 CardBus on a Mitac 5033T: with
some imagination, I guessed that it features a DEC 21143 chipset, so it
can be drived with the 'tulip_cb' driver under Linux.
I'm using linux-2.2.3 on AMD K6-2/333.
This card is recognized and powered on but in a couple of seconds
starts emitting messages like that:
eth0: 21140 transmit timed out, status f0120000, SIA 000000c6 ffff0001
fffbff7f 8ff50000, resetting...
eth0: transmit timed out, switching to 10baseT media.
It continues with these messages until I stop the pcmcia service at
all.
I had compiled the latest tulip driver 0.9 as a module for CardBus but
it does not work.
Does anybody knows how to fix the problem of media recognition? It is
some other problem behind that?
Claudiuccio
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:45:40 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here in comp.os.linux.setup, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (doole) spake unto us, saying:
>"Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> apparently said this:
>
>>The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>
>From Authorities? Why??
What happens if that Authority decides to use your information in a
manner which harms you? Or if someone else steals that information
from that Authority?
Blind trust can be foolish.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
"Paid off"? What does that mean?"
------------------------------
From: ken brakey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:45:42 GMT
SEE! I'm NOT paranoid! THEY ARE out to get me! :)
ken
John Hasler wrote:
> Rufus V. Smith writes:
> >The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>
> doole writes:
> > From Authorities? Why??
>
> "Authorities" with a capital "A", eh? Who do you think these "Authorities"
> are, God? Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
> organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
> private files?
> --
> John Hasler This posting is in the public domain.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.
> Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind.
> Elmwood, Wisconsin Do not send email advertisements to this address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tiger)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Tulip driver, with buildin 21143 controller.
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:54:31 GMT
Stephen Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
the latest tulip driver solved your problem or not?
>Yer. I did get the latest tulip driver dated the 24-Feb-'99. re-compiled as per
>my orignal posting.
>Cheers,
>Stephen,
>Alice Springs,
>Out Back Oz.
>John Strange wrote:
>> Try a newer driver at
>>
>> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers
>>
>> [Snip ]
--
("\''/").___..--''"`-._
\ `9_ 9 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
\ /\ (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( ) _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' .'
.( o ). (il).-'' ((i).' ((!.-'
------------------------------
From: Daniel Tisserand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Which SMP Motherboard?
Date: 19 Mar 1999 13:55:28 GMT
Hefin,
Our current system is dual P2/350MHz on a SuperMicro P6DBS board, runs
great. We are using the intel pro/100, it also is great. We run a
distributed Oracle database and not a lick of problems. Averaging over
10GB/wk between the servers without a problem.
The local
university has 6 linux servers, including a full feed news server, all
using the intel card on dual
pentium/233s and have not had one problem. Very stable.
Good luck,
Daniel
On Tue, 16 Mar 1999, Jason McKnight wrote:
> I must agree with the other posters. I have an ASUS P2B-DS and have had
> no troubles with it. I don't have any Celeron's :) but I would if it was
> my system at home. I have 2 PII450's and it is a sweet system.
>
> Hefin James wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm currently specifying a machine for a major Linux based server
> > project.
> > Has anybody using the Intel L440GX+ motherboard?
> > It has a Adaptec AIC7896 U2W and UW channels, and a graphics card on
> > board, which is supported by Linux.
> >
> > It also has Intel EtherExpress PRO 100+ chip onboard but it uses the
> > Intel 82559 chip which is not mentioned in the eepro100.c driver. Has
> > anybody else got this card? and more importantly does it work?
> >
> > What SMP motherboard you running?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hefin
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Dr. Yuan Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Tulip driver, with buildin 21143 controller.
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:06:14 -0500
I didn't see your original posting. (My news server expires really
fast.) Can you elaborate again?
I'm using AlphaServer 400/233 with onboard tulip. I installed Red Hat
5.2. Doesn't seem to have a problem.
--
+--- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------- http://www.ChiTech.ca/ ---+
| Dr. Yuan LIU - Chitech Technologies Inc. |
+------- (514)281-0494 ------------------ FAX (514)281-0493 ------+
Stephen Ashley wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> No it did not. I have been just waiting to see if any more replys come in. I have
> go my system going with a DE450 10Mhz card. But due to my sites UTP wiring
> standards I have had to create a butched cable wall cable. Its a long story, anyhow
> I would real like to get the on board controller to work. This way I will have a
> much better chance of converting the other users system here, off NT and Over to
> linux.
>
> I was planning to send a mail message to [Donald Becker] and/or other on the tulip
> development site to see if I can get some assistance, and what I need to feed back
> to them.
>
> Do you mind if I ask what your interest is in this, can you suggest other coursers
> of action?
>
> Cheers,
> Stephen Ashley.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
