Linux-Networking Digest #590, Volume #10 Mon, 22 Mar 99 06:13:46 EST
Contents:
Re: 3c59x ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: 3Com 3C509 NIC Question (Vidar Andresen)
DHCP and name resolving ("Marc Teutelink")
LAN Card (Ng Wai Wing)
Re: PPP host (Lew Pitcher)
Help - remote ppp user cannot see beyond linux box ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
qmail: general forward (Christian Lasarcyzk)
Samba and VMWARE ("Jan Roesner")
Re: SAMBA, please? (Kevin Huang)
Re: RAID ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux - NT RAS Problems: Working now Not (Diederick van Dijk)
Re: Help: nslookup fails on IP address (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: Linux workgroup (Lew Pitcher)
Re: Cable Modems & Linux (Lew Pitcher)
Re: Dialup, Linux, Windows, Networking Query (Lew Pitcher)
Re: What is the best Linux to install? (sean mc cann)
About Dlink Network card compatibility? (Jofai)
Re: Yet Another PPP Problem ("Greg")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 3c59x
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 08:35:28 GMT
In article <7cjctl$67b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Mosley) wrote:
> Has anybody successfully got the 3c509B working at 100Mbits??
>
> How did you do that!
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
>
Some people from list "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" said that this card has
problems which paralized their Linux boxes. I have 2 this cards and I dare
not to use it with my Linux box because of these messages.
Subscribe to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Good luck!
CN
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: 3Com 3C509 NIC Question
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 08:32:47 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NAdams5755) wrote:
>I'm a newbie to Linux so bear with me. I know that this card is one of the
>easiest to configure on Linux, but everytime I boot, I get a 'Delaying ETH0
>Initialization"
>The NIC works in WIN95, and I set the IRQ-I/O with thier DOS sotware.
Then you already have the 3com utility to turn off PnP. (or is that
only the 3C509b ... hmm.) The 3C509N2.EXE containing 3C5X9CFG.EXE
should do the job.
Http://support.3com/com/ and ftp://ftp.3com.com/
> How can
>I get it to load the drivers? Do I have to compile them into the Kernel? Any
>help would be appreciated. BTW, I'm running RH5.2 on an old P133, 32mb ram, a
>dedicated 2gb drive, and the rest etc.
('an old P133', that's not old...)
I have it compiled into the kernel, but i dont think you need to.
Any conflicts in irq's ? (I use to set the irq used for my isa cards to
pure isa in bios, but that's probably overkill.)
Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: "Marc Teutelink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,linux.samba
Subject: DHCP and name resolving
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:57:20 +0100
Hello,
I'm currently running linux 2.2.1 and I want this machine to act as a NT
server for all mij other machines. I set up DHCP, and all these computers
retrieve new IP-addresses fromt he server. That works, but now I want these
IP-addresses to be available for DNS purposes.
How does my nameserver know which IP-address (assigned through DHCP) belongs
to which computer. How does DHCP and DNS work together.
ps: maybe somebody has some valid named.* files for this minimal DNS. My
range is 192.168.1.*. Everything else should be looked up on another
secundairy nameserver.
Kind regards,
Marc Teutelink (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ng Wai Wing)
Subject: LAN Card
Date: 22 Mar 1999 08:15:18 GMT
What can I do if the kernel doesn't support my lan card? What should I
modify? I'm using Redhat 5.2 and linux kernel version 2.0.36.
Martin
------------------------------
From: Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP host
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:00:06 -0500
Jean-R=E9ginald Louis wrote:
> =
> I have a little problem that I can't solve. I have a home network compo=
se of
> 2 computer, a Linux box and a Win98 box. All work perfectly. Then, I tr=
ied
> to configure a PPP server in the Linux box. This work to, the remote ca=
n
> telnet and ftp the Linux box. (note that the remote is a Win98 machine)=
=2E
> =
> Here my problem. When we tried (me and a friend who Dialup in the Linux=
box)
> to play an network game (using tcp/ip), it's doesn't work at all. We tr=
ied
> severall games like quake 2, Raindow Six and Fifa 99, but nothing happe=
n.
> =
> Here a little shema of my 'tiny-home-network'.
> =
> [ LinuxBox Local ] (ppp-server) 192.168.0.1
> [ Win98Box Local ] (host) 192.168.0.2
> =
> [ Win98Box Remote) (remote host) 192.168.0.3
> =
> For example, if I start Quake 2 on my win98 machine, acting like the ga=
me
> server, the remote game can find any game server.
> =
> Any advice? Please help me.
Have ytou enabled IP Forwarding on the Linux box? Redraw your diagram
like this...
[Win98 Local]----[Linux]----[Win98 Remote]
You see that for traffic to get from "Win98 Local" to "Win98 Remote",
it has to go...
a) Win98 Local to Linux eth0
b) Linux eth0 to Linux ppp0
c) Linux ppp0 to Win98 Remote
It's step (b) that doesn't seem to work, right?
Step (b) is called "IP Forwarding", and it's not something that's
usually configured as the default.
-- =
Lew Pitcher | If everyone has an angle, why
JOAT-in-training | are most of them so obtuse?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help - remote ppp user cannot see beyond linux box
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 10:00:56 GMT
Hello good people!
This is our situation and problem: We have thin ethernet tcp/ip lan at our
head office with ip numbers such as 192.0.0.nnn. These are SCO, windoze95/98
and linux boxes. One linux box 192.0.0.131 is set up with a modem to receive
ppp calls thus: Fresh install of rh5.2, installed mgetty...rpm from rh cd,
added following line in /etc/inittab: S1:3456:respawn:/sbin/mgetty -n 1
/dev/ttyS1
Set up a user called nppp with home as /home/nppp and /home/nppp/.ppprc as:
-detach
modem
crtscts
lock
192.50.1.1:192.50.1.2
proxyarp
defaultroute
/etc/passwd entry for user nppp is this:
nppp:ZFQvhhobTADXk:504:504:nppp:/home/nppp:/usr/sbin/pppd
Ensured that ip forwarding is included in the rh5.2 stock kernel 2.0.36 by
issueing command: cat /proc/ksyms|grep ip_forward
Changed FORWARD_IPV4 line in /etc/sysconfig/network to
FORWARD_IPV4=true
Set up ip_forwarding by echo 1>/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
/proc/net/ip_forward was: IP firewall forward rules, default 4
I added following lines in /etc/rc.d/rc.local:
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p accept # default Forwarding policy
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a accept -b # bidirectional
Tried even the following:
ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -b -S 192.50.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0 -W ppp0
The problem: When I make a ppp call to the above mentioned linux box, I am
able to ping 192.0.0.131 which is the ip address of the lan card in linux box
but I am not able to ping anyone else on the head office lan such as
192.0.0.64. We need to get this to work, Please help. As you can see this set
up does not involve a connection to ISP. I suppose then this is not a
masquarding thing. Also this need not be a firewall since no conection to the
world is involved. Is ip forwarding intrinsically linked with firewalling ie
we can't have forwarding without firewalling? Another thing, when the same
remote machine calls an SCO box on our head office lan which is set to accept
ppp calls, remote user is able to ping every one on the HO lan. Looks like
SCO box is forwarding packets between ppp and eth0 interface, while linux box
isn't. The remote machine is a linux box. We have also tried calling from a
win95 box. I also checked the routes but could not figure out why it isn't
working. Help.
Thanks in advance.
J Dubal
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Christian Lasarcyzk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.misc,comp.unix.admin
Subject: qmail: general forward
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:33:52 +0100
Hallo,
I want qmail to forward every mail (for every user) to an other
email-address with the same username and an other hostname. I need a
general solution, no ".forward"-stuff please, because the hosts share
these directory via nfs.
TNX
Christian
------------------------------
From: "Jan Roesner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba and VMWARE
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 12:16:38 +0100
Hi folks !
Some days ago I found the fantastic beta of vmware.
Can anybody help me configuring SAMBA this way that it can serve all my
filesystems to virtual machines ?
Or has anybody enabled the bridged -mode successfully ?
Every kind of help is welcome !
Greets Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:21:37 +0000
From: Kevin Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SAMBA, please?
John Wong wrote:
> All my neighbouring computers are in the same submask but the network is
> dhcp based for WINS Microsoft Network.
> I'm not so familiar with the network stuff on Linux...... just a newbie, but
> I felt headache if I tried to access my neighbouring PCs' shares:
> For Linux -> MS:
> 1. I have to know the name (NetBios) of the PC/ the IP address of the PC
> 2. I have to know the shared service's name on that PC
> 3. I donno whether there's passwd setted on that......
> All the 1, 2 & 3 stuff.... I gotta get by going out to a neighbouring room
> and look that up on a MS Machines...
> For MS -> MS
> 1. I just have to click on the Network Neighbourhood Icon and then all the
> neighbouring PC available on the same submask will show up....
> 2. To manipulate the shared resources on every single PC, I just have to
> browse in the windows on each machine
> I don't have to know the name of the PC nor its IP nor its sharenames...
>
> Anyway...... I really like Linux... To fight against the monopoly....
> I really hope somebody can help me..... to give us some solutions......
>
> Best Regards
> John
> James Wanless wrote in message <7brmsr$ijj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >How easy is this using RedHat5.2 to "see" (MS)windows machines on a
> >LAN - I haven't succeeded yet. Any pointers, please?
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >James Wanless
> >http://www.jwanless.freeserve.co.uk
> >
> >
> >
Try smbclient -L //NameOfYourLinuxBox. This should pull out the list of your
workgroup/domain.
Which dist/ver of Linux you're using BTW? RedHat comes owth a good example of
/etc/smb.conf
Best Regards
Kevin Huang\\
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RAID
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:42:26 GMT
In article <7d48ss$gng$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am currently working on a project to implement a logical RAID system, and I
> am looking for source codes to get some basic ideas. Could you tell me where
> i can find the RAID source code ? Your help will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> Sylvia
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
I am unfamilar with Deja News posting procedures.
Try:
http://ostenfeld.dk/~jakob/Software-RAID.HOWTO/
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diederick van Dijk)
Subject: Re: Linux - NT RAS Problems: Working now Not
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:47:35 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Enns) wrote:
>Until the other day, I was able to connect to my employer's
>NT network from home using Linux. My work uses RAS. In order
>to avoid problems (?), I was 'moved' to another box (now GREY
>and not TAN). My password was also changed. I was able to get W98
>to connect just fine with the new password, but I did have to add
>the domain to the 'domain' box on the signin prompt. So the color
>change of the server does not seem to be relevant to whatever they
>did to me. But the bottom line is that my Linux connection no
>longer works. Here is what some of the diagnostic messages are:
>
>Mar 21 14:50:14 frodo1 pppd[361]: Serial connection established.
>Mar 21 14:50:14 frodo1 chat[362]: -- got it
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 pppd[361]: Using interface ppp0
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 pppd[361]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to 70000
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp: successfully queued 27 bytes, flags =
>f070000
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp: successfully queued 16 bytes, flags =
>f070000
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap 0
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to f070003
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set flags to f070003
>Mar 21 14:50:15 frodo1 kernel: ppp: successfully queued 15 bytes, flags =
>f070003
>Mar 21 14:50:18 frodo1 kernel: ppp: successfully queued 15 bytes, flags =
>f070003
>Mar 21 14:50:18 frodo1 pppd[361]: Remote message: E=691 R=1
>Mar 21 14:50:18 frodo1 pppd[361]: CHAP authentication failed
>
>Now, the E=961 error will repeat itself until I hang up. I am assuming
>that the only thing I needed to change in 'CHAP-SECRETS' was my password
>references. I have also tried adding (and then removing) a new option
>to my startup pppd script i.e. 'domain mycompanydomain \'. Even if I
>try to change the color to the supposed 'new' color, it hangs up
>immediately.
First modify your CHAP-SECRETS and put mycompanydomain// before
your username.
If this doesn't work you should check or the new NT machine requires
encrypted logon. If so, you need a modified pppd with the protocol
MS-CHAP compiled into it. For a more detailed explanation see my
homepage.
For a better analysis of your log you have to provide debug info of
the pppd daemon too.
>
>How can I find out what error messages (like 691) mean? Could they
>have changed things in some even more bizarre way that I could not
>even imagine?
Your NT administrator should know this. 691 means that NT RAS doesn't
recognize you.
============================================================
Bill can't buy or beat the Internet.
So Linux will win every time.
Diederick van Dijk
Homepage: http://www.van-dijk.net
Mini-Howto PPP to NT with MS Chap and callback :
http://www.van-dijk.net/PPP-NT-HOWTO/PPP-NT-HOWTO.html
=============================================================
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Help: nslookup fails on IP address
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 07:41:31 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (WARGY) writes:
>When I run 'nslookup ns1.<domain name> 195.xxx.xxx.x, I get the
>following error message.
>*** Can't find server name for address 195.xxx.xxx.x: Server failed
>*** Default servers are not available
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>nslookup brings back the correct info when I do 'nslookup ns1.<domain
>name> but fails if looking up the IP address of that name.
[...]
Just as the error message indicates, the nameserver you're defined
can not be accessed at that time. You might perhaps want to add
a secondary nameserver into /etc/resolv.conf .
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Linux workgroup
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 04:23:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 06:07:05 GMT, "Joven (Another Linux User!)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What can I set up Linux as workgroup so other Win95 client can see my
>Linux under network nebourhoot?
>
You might have noticed all the msgs here about Samba. That's the package
that you will need to install on Linux so that Win95/Win98/WinNT "Network
Neighbourhood" will detect the Linux system.
Check out http://www.samba.org/
and read the SMB-HOWTO that should have come with your Linux distribution.
Lew Pitcher
JOAT-in-training
------------------------------
From: Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cable Modems & Linux
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:40:08 -0500
Phrostbit wrote:
>
> I am considering using my Redhat 5.1 box as a Proxy server and
> Firewall on my home LAN for my cable modem ... has anyone attempted
> this??? What are some things I should be aware of or watch out for???
>
> THanks,
>
> Phrosty
Try http://members.home.net/adaviel/LinuxWave.html
and http://members.home.net/adaviel/localnet.html
Linux on a cable modem, in Vancouver BC.
--
Lew Pitcher | If everyone has an angle, why
JOAT-in-training | are most of them so obtuse?
------------------------------
From: Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.slackware,alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Dialup, Linux, Windows, Networking Query
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 17:54:55 -0500
Sandy W wrote:
>
> I am hoping someone can help me with the following roblem I have.
> (I think I may need Samba to complete the task)
>
> At the momment I have a network consisting of
> 5 Windows '9x workstations
> 1 Linux Server with 2 modems
>
> One of the modems is a perm connection to the Internet
> The second I want to use as a dialup,
>
> So from home on a Win9x machine I wish to dialup to my Linux Box at work,
> from their I want to be able to both use the Internet, AND use access the
> win9x workstation on the network.
>
> I want to be able to access the win w/s's at work from my home dialup
> computer as if I was in the office, able to browse drives with r/w access
> via network neighborhood etc, (and probably print).
>
> The operation on all win machines involved needs to be as simple as local
> network access as it is now with no realy changes.
>
> Can someone explain the best way to do this,
>
> Any help on this matter would be very appriciated.
A quick picture before we discuss this...
+-------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+
| Win95 | | Win95 | | Win95 | | Win95 | | Win95 |
+---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+ +---+---+
I I I I I
`==========O==========O==========O=========='
I
+-------+
Office | Linux |
+-+---+-+
/ \
/ The Internet
...................../.........................
/
+---+---+
Home | Win95 |
+-------+
Ok. Here's what you do...
1) From the IP network address you are running at work, allocate a
pair of IP addresses for the dial-in line.
2) On the Linux box, configure the PPPd server to run the second line,
assigning one of the two IP addresses to the Linux-side modem, and
the other IP address to the caller's modem
3) Configure your home Win95 system to call the Linux system and log in
to the Linux PPPd server.
What this gives you is a Win95 machine (at home) that (when dialed into
the Linux system) will be on the same network as your Win95 systems at
the office, and the office's internet connection.
If you them treat your office Linux system as an ISP to your home Win95
(routing, DNS, etc), your Win95 system should be able to access both the
office Win95 systems, and the internet throught the Linux system
If you want the Linux system to show up in Network Neighbourhood, you
can install Samba. However, for simple internet access, and access to
your
office Win95 machines, Samba isn't necessary.
Good Luck...
--
Lew Pitcher | If everyone has an angle, why
JOAT-in-training | are most of them so obtuse?
------------------------------
From: sean mc cann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.redhat,alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: What is the best Linux to install?
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 01:12:31 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard wrote:
>
> I am trying to install the newest and the best linux on
> 100+ workstation. What would be the best one to choose
> in terms of standard, support, and setup?
>
> Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
> email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks in advance
> Richard
Hi Richard,
Well which distrabution depends on what you want to to do. I use Suse
distro becuase of the yast setup tool. You can configure one machine and
replicate the setup exactly across the whole network. It really take the
drudgery out of setting up multiple machines on a network.
Any problems I've had with suse have been my fault. Also most of the
issues with Suse are coverd in the 450+ page manual. Thats not bad for
35 Irish pounds($us50).the new Suse6.2 comes with the 2.2 kernal and
Xfree 3.3.3.3 which support the newer grahics cards in X. Also
there is a suppoert databaseon the cd which you can install on to your
hard drive. the lastest version will of course be on the web site.
Suse is well engineered and caters for the network admin who like to go
home early:) At the end of the day which distro you choose depends on
your personal taste.
Sean
------------------------------
From: Jofai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: About Dlink Network card compatibility?
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 09:25:30 GMT
Hi:
I got two D-link DFE-530TX and one DE-528CT network card, if i put
two D-link DFE-530TX in my AMD-300 with Linux5.2 OS. Do u think it will
work with two exactly same card to put together. By the way does anyone
know D-link DE-528CT compatible with Linux? thx.
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Yet Another PPP Problem
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 05:26:00 -0500
Have you edited your /etc/resolv.conf file ? sounds like you need to add
the nameservers of your ISP
#resolv.conf
domain <your isp domain name here>
search <same as above>
nameserver 12.34.56.78 #the ip of your isp dns
nameserver 78.91.12.34 # if more then one
this file should have this info, edit to fit your systems connection.
hope this helps.
Greg.
David Bossert wrote in message <7cvamj$j8t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've read all the docs and done everything they say, using chat or minicom
>and pppd. It always dials alright, then pppd does squat. Nothing. I got it
>working once (saw the connection in ifconfig) but something was wrong with
>the DNS; couldn't get anywhere. Someone please help.
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
