Linux-Networking Digest #625, Volume #10 Thu, 25 Mar 99 07:13:50 EST
Contents:
DFS client ? (Damir Buskulic)
Linux Client on an NT network (Wayne Chunn)
Re: winmodems ("John Hardin")
remote x server problems ("Michael")
RSVP (Keith Jackson)
Re: PPP makes me crazy, please anyone give a good idea (Ming-Ho Su)
Re: How to configure 3 n/w cards on a single machine? (Joe Haberthier)
pppd - demand dialing question (Bob)
traceroute 10.1.1.2=> 10.1.1.1 .323ms !H .238ms !H (Kishore)
Re: How to configure 3 n/w cards on a single machine? (Kishore)
Re: can't telnet to my machine ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Which ISA network card is best? NE2000 or Intel? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: how to get getty to generate login (Villy Kruse)
sniffers ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux, wins and dhcp-dhcpcd problem... (Francois-Xavier Joos)
help with cisco 2511 and static IP on ppp dialup ("Bernard Mwenda")
Re: What is the best Linux to install? (Joe Keane)
No network - RH 5.2 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Raunholm)
Re: module net-pf-19? (John Strange)
Whoops! (Josh Gardner)
Re: Firewall and proxy server for Linux. (Raymond Doetjes)
PPP Connection w/ null modem? (Jeremy Woodburn)
Re: Redirect packets to web server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
After Samba installation (Yahya Darboe)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Damir Buskulic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DFS client ?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:12:13 +0100
Hi,
Does somebody know if there is a DFS client/server in preparation for
Linux ?
Cheers
Damir
--
=====================================================================
| Damir Buskulic | Universite de Savoie/LAPP |
| | Chemin de Bellevue, B.P. 110 |
| Tel : +33 (0)450091600 | F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex |
| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | FRANCE |
=====================================================================
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Wayne Chunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux Client on an NT network
Date: 25 Mar 1999 03:31:53 GMT
Greetings,
Is it possible to login to an NT network with my Linux laptop?
Thanks in advance,
Wayne
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: winmodems
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:41:12 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 16:37:26 -0500, "batags"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>better yet...get everybody that runs linux to e-mail USR/3com to
>develop a linux driver for their winmodem. They cannot ignore 2
>million e-mails in their mailbox requesting support. :-)
Feh. Why do *I* care whether a Winmodem will work under Linux?
Return it for a refund and get a real modem. *That* USR will pay attention
to.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
In the Lion
the Mighty Lion
the Zebra sleeps tonight...
Dee de-ee-ee-ee-ee de de de we um umma way!
------------------------------
From: "Michael" <&&[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: remote x server problems
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 01:11:55 -0700
Hi, I finally set up Exceed 6.0 on WinNT to run with my RH 5.1 system. I
have KDE set up and I'm playing with different themes. It seems that
whenever I go to the display properties panel, it goes REALLLLLLLYYYY
slowly,and it seems to depend on the size of the bitmap background. What
worries me is that I have a 100base-t point to point connection under my
desk, so bandwidth shouldn't be a problem, even for large images. Also, why
is the display panel sending so much data across the network, if at all?
Also, when I try to scale the background image (as opposed to tiled or
centered) it takes forever. I'm running a P-166 with 128MB on the linux
end, and a dual P-pro 200 with 64MB on the NT end, so speed/memory is not a
problem. This speed problem also happened with another x server I
downloaded.
Secondly, with the Exceed, the control panel at the bottom of the screen
comes on the for the first few seconds and then disappears entirely. when I
resurrect it with kpanel from an xterm, it dies out again. This did not
happen with the previous x server (before exceed).
thanks for any input
m.s.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Keith Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RSVP
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 17:40:19 -0800
hi,
Anybody know who the people are who are working on RSVP implementations
in linux? One of my co-workers at LBNL is doing research on prioritized
routing, and scheduling high priority flows, and would like to find out
a little about the state and future plans for QoS support in linux.
thanks in advance,
--keith
--
************************************************************************
If you get confused, listen to the music play.
--Robert Hunter
************************************************************************
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ming-Ho Su)
Subject: Re: PPP makes me crazy, please anyone give a good idea
Date: 25 Mar 1999 03:41:10 GMT
Jos van Santen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi
: Since a few days I'm trying to get my ppp connection to work. I've tried
: KPPP, PPPD with a script from my provider, NETCFG (redhat) and Linuxconf
: with IFUP and IFDOWN. They all give the same result, I get connected to my
: ISP and I get an IP address assigned, but it's impossible to reach anything
: outside my computer. I can ping the ppp0 address, but not the gateway. I do
: see activity on the modem when I ping an IP address (once every second). A
: ping to a dns name results in a one time activity. This looks normal, except
: for the fact that there's no response from my ISP.
: below is a part of the var/log/messages file:
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: send (ATZ^M)
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: expect (OK)
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: ATZ^M^M
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: OK
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: -- got it
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: send (ATDT550455^M)
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: expect (CONNECT)
: Mar 22 22:32:40 localhost chat[534]: ^M
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: ATDT550455^M^M
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: CONNECT
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: -- got it
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: send (^M)
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: timeout set to 5 seconds
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: expect (~)
: Mar 22 22:32:57 localhost chat[534]: 57600^M
: Mar 22 22:32:59 localhost chat[534]: ^QWelcome to XS4ALL.^M
: Mar 22 22:32:59 localhost chat[534]: ^M
: Mar 22 22:32:59 localhost chat[534]: Login as 'new' if you're new.^M
: Mar 22 22:32:59 localhost chat[534]: ^M
: Mar 22 22:32:59 localhost chat[534]: ^M
: Mar 22 22:32:59 localhost chat[534]: XS4ALL login: ^M
: Mar 22 22:33:02 localhost chat[534]: alarm
: Mar 22 22:33:02 localhost chat[534]: send (^M)
: Mar 22 22:33:02 localhost chat[534]: send (^M)
: Mar 22 22:33:02 localhost pppd[532]: Serial connection established.
: Mar 22 22:33:03 localhost pppd[532]: Using interface ppp0
: Mar 22 22:33:03 localhost pppd[532]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua0
: Mar 22 22:33:07 localhost pppd[532]: Remote message: ^M Starting PPP for
: address 194.109.132.199^M ^M
: Mar 22 22:33:07 localhost pppd[532]: local IP address 194.109.132.199
: Mar 22 22:33:07 localhost pppd[532]: remote IP address 194.109.6.1
: Mar 22 22:33:07 localhost kernel: Swansea University Computer Society IPX
: 0.34 for NET3.035
: Mar 22 22:33:07 localhost kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera,
: Inc.
: Mar 22 22:33:07 localhost kernel: Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
: I only can imagine that it has to do with the fact that the deault gateway
: is not in my subnet....should I configure supernetting or something to get
: to the default gateway?
: Thanks for any ideas!
: Jos
1. call you isp to make sure their DNS IP address
2. setup you resolve.conf
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Haberthier)
Subject: Re: How to configure 3 n/w cards on a single machine?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 03:19:43 GMT
I think your problem is that yor using a class C subnet mask with a
class A license.
On 25 Mar 1999 02:31:52 GMT, Kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I have a machine which has 3 network cards on it.
>I gave it
>10.1.1.1
>10.1.2.1
>10.1.3.1
>as the ip addressses to it.
>
>I have another machine which I gave 10.1.1.2 (IP addr)
>10.1.1.1 as the gw.
>
>I gave 255.255.255.0 as Subnet mask for this machine.
>This machine(10.1.1.2) cannot ping the gw.
>even the gateway cannot ping this.
>Please give me a detailed approach how to do this.
>Just establish two machines with network connection.
>10.1.2.1 is to be connected to a separate machine with IP 10.1.2.2
>But I have not tried yet!
>Thanks for your suggestions in advance
>Sincerely,
>Kishore
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob)
Subject: pppd - demand dialing question
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 20:42:26 -0700
Hi All,
Running RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.0.36
Had some trouble compiling diald so I'm attempting to get pppd demand
dialing for my home network.
I downloaded the source upgrade, patched the source, built the pppd
stuff, recomiled the kernel. I am the proud owner of a demand dial
capable pppd.
I'm currently stuck on the proper pppd execution line.
My ppp0 dials fine from activating it via the Network Config in X so I
know that's right.But no luck on starting it for demand dial.
I would greatly appreciate some gentle nudging as to how to invoke pppd
to demand dial. Been around the man page, etc but have not found any
pseudo HOW-TOs or web pages to help explain this part of diald.
TIA,
Bob
------------------------------
From: Kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: traceroute 10.1.1.2=> 10.1.1.1 .323ms !H .238ms !H
Date: 25 Mar 1999 06:31:57 GMT
I have a stand alone network
#traceroute 10.1.1.2
1. 10.1.1.1 .323ms !H .238ms !H .198ms !H
#
What does this mean?
Thanks,
Kishore
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to configure 3 n/w cards on a single machine?
Date: 25 Mar 1999 06:32:07 GMT
hi Joe,
Joe Haberthier wrote:
>
> I think your problem is that yor using a class C subnet mask with a
> class A license.
This is a stand alone network,
It has 4 computers
H1[1]-> Router[3] -> Router[3] -> H2[1]
[x]= # of network cards on it.
So how should I give teh addresses to them.
It didn't ping and says
#traceroute 10.1.1.2
1.10.1.1.1 0.253ms !H 0.148ms 0.118ms !H
I tried teh same command on the host too but teh same result with
with IP address different.
Please help me.
thanks,
Kishore
>
>
> On 25 Mar 1999 02:31:52 GMT, Kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >I have a machine which has 3 network cards on it.
>
> >I gave it
>
> >10.1.1.1
>
> >10.1.2.1
>
> >10.1.3.1
>
> >as the ip addressses to it.
>
> >
>
> >I have another machine which I gave 10.1.1.2 (IP addr)
>
> >10.1.1.1 as the gw.
>
> >
>
> >I gave 255.255.255.0 as Subnet mask for this machine.
>
> >This machine(10.1.1.2) cannot ping the gw.
>
> >even the gateway cannot ping this.
>
> >Please give me a detailed approach how to do this.
>
> >Just establish two machines with network connection.
>
> >10.1.2.1 is to be connected to a separate machine with IP 10.1.2.2
>
> >But I have not tried yet!
>
> >Thanks for your suggestions in advance
>
> >Sincerely,
>
> >Kishore
> >
> >------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> > http://www.searchlinux.com
>
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can't telnet to my machine
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 06:34:02 GMT
In article <7dbadf$hol$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a RH 5.0 box. I am unable to telnet or ftp to that machine from any
> other machine on the network, although I can ping it, use apache, etc. It is
> able to access other machines as well. I am able to telnet to 127.0.0.1 on
> that machine, and to its ip address (192.168.0.1). My /etc/hosts.allow and
> hosts.deny files are empty, so I don't think that's the problem.
> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Jim Hanson
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
there is the known issue about telnet and root ( not possible under normal
circumstances)
otherwise i suggest you look into /var/log for any messages,warnings etc that
were added just when you tried the access.
most of the time you find more details there
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Which ISA network card is best? NE2000 or Intel?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 06:28:15 GMT
In article <01be761d$fd923820$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not really asking which card is best, more like.. "Which one works best
> under Linux?" I have at my disposal several NE2000 cards and a couple of
> Intel Etherexpress Pro cards. I figured the Intel card might be better so
> I put it in instead of the NE2000 I'd been using for years. I recompiled
> the kernel and it does work. However, it takes it like 30 seconds longer
> to boot because it is giving weird messages about the card and then while
> booted strange messages come across the console every few minutes about the
> card. However, it does work and there seems to be no trouble. I'm think
> about switching back to the NE2000, but I am not sure anymore. Any
> thoughts?
> --DavidM
>
just to add my 2pc worth of experience,
i used cheap noname ne2000-compatibles for quite a while now,
also the pcmcia-variety
never had any problems of not being recognized at boot-up and stuff.
i'm pretty happy with them and will stick to them
the others i tried are the 3c509 ones, they're ok as well
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: how to get getty to generate login
Date: 24 Mar 1999 20:12:29 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
M. Buchenrieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Farhad Farzaneh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>[...]
>
>>The inittab file looks like:
>
>># Run getty on /dev/modem
>>0:2345:respawn:/sbin/uugetty -h cua0 57600 vt100
>
>[...]
>
>I can't really recommend using uugetty for this task. Use mgetty instead.
>
True, and no gettys should use the cua device either. Use the ttySx device.
Someone informed me that if you use uugetty you run uugetty on the ttySx
device and use the cuax device for uucp and other dial-out programs.
With the upcomming release the cuax device is going to disapear, so you
probably get problems making uugetty work.
Villy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: sniffers
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 06:44:35 GMT
Are there any good sniffers for linux>>> any that are GUI's
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Francois-Xavier Joos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux, wins and dhcp-dhcpcd problem...
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:23:18 +0100
Hi,
I am working to install a red hat 5.2 linux box in a "full windows"
network with nt servers. Linux get an ip address with dhcpcd but the
computer name is not mapped to its ip address in wins: I can access
linux box only with its ip address but not with its name...
If I put, by hand, name and ip address in wins, it works fine but my
network admin doesn't want to make a static map in wins saying it should
be automated...
I am sure this has been resolved by someone, please help... What do I
have to do in linux conf ?
If I want to use Samba, must I have my name problem resolved before or
can I use Samba with ip adresses ?
Thanks
Francois-Xavier Joos
------------------------------
From: "Bernard Mwenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: help with cisco 2511 and static IP on ppp dialup
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:22:56 +0300
Reply-To: "Bernard Mwenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi guys,
I am using radius authentication and accounting server running on linux with
my modems and telephone lines attached to cisco 2511 routers. I am getting a
number of requests for setups which will be using ETRN and will need static
IP's. How do I do this on dial-up without having to assign each user a modem
and telephone line? How would they dial into a pilot line and have them
assigned the same ip each time they dial in?
At the moments each async port connected to a modem line is assigned an IP.
Please help.
Bernard Mwenda,
Net 2000 kenya.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Joe Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: What is the best Linux to install?
Date: 25 Mar 1999 00:36:42 -0800
In article <7d6822$6u1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rufus V. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>What's the best tasting fruit: Apples, Pears, Oranges, or Bananas?
Pears.
>If it's not in the FAQ's, it should be added.
--
Joe Keane, amateur mathematician
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Raunholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: No network - RH 5.2
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 05:45:17 +0100
I have a computer in my workplace installed with RedHat 5.2 and Win 98.
When I run Linux I can't get access to the network. I've transferred all
the info I've found in Win98 about DNS server, gateway, my own
IP-adress. I entered all this info during installation, and I've checked
it in Linuxconfig, but I still get no reaction from the network. My NIC
is 3Com 3c509b.
Hints please ?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange)
Subject: Re: module net-pf-19?
Date: 25 Mar 1999 11:17:23 GMT
try /sbin/modprobe -c
Fluor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi there,
: Could someone please tell me what module net-pf-19 stands for?
: Linux recently began to complain that it isn't able to load this
: module. I think is is caused by NetScape (because the message
: appears every time I start NetScape, and directly after the
: bootprocess mounted all my partitions).
: net-pf-19 has not ever been in conf.modules, so I don't know
: where it came from.
: What evil world does it spring from?! :]
: Please help!
: Thnx,
: -- Fluor
--
While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:51:33 -0800
From: Josh Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Whoops!
Sorry, the 3c507 is aka "Etherlink 16 TP" NOT etherlink II tp
------------------------------
From: Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Re: Firewall and proxy server for Linux.
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 14:32:01 +0100
First you create a kernel with firewalling and masquerading.
Add then install Squid as a caching proxy. This is the best solution we
run it in our company without any problems
Raymond
APPANAH Ravi wrote:
> Hi !!
>
> I'm looking for a firewall and proxy server software...I don't want to
> use Checkpoint Firewall-1 or Microsoft Proxy Server...
> I am setting up a linux server. And I want to put a firewall and proxy
> server onto.
> Could anyone please suggest a good firewall and proxy server packages
> that could use?
>
> Thanks in advance...
> Regards,
> APPANAH ravi
>
> --
> Ravi APPANAH
> Product Validation & Support Engineer
> ------------------------------------------
> EolRinG International
> 10, rue Alfred Kastler
> 14000 Caen - FRANCE
> Tel : +33 (0)2 31 06 19 75
> Fax : +33 (0)2 31 06 19 76
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web : http://www.eolring.fr
> ------------------------------------------
--
=====================================================================
Windows is a 32 bit patch to a 16 bit GUI based on a 8 bit operating
system, written for a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company which can
not stand 1 bit of competition.
=====================================================================
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 00:01:09 -0800
From: Jeremy Woodburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP Connection w/ null modem?
Hi -
Disclaimer: Massive Newbie, limited time in the evenings.
The situation is this:
I have a laptop & T1 line at work, and a desktop & 56k modem at home.
Both computers have Linux on them. I bring the laptop home occasionally
and would like to use a serial null modem cable to swap files loaded
onto the laptop. The laptop does not have an ethernet connection
independent of the dock at work, so that isn't an option.
The current goal: Connect the laptop and desktop in the simplest way
possible to tranfer (largish) files.
Alternative 1: Set up PPP connection with each computer having a
separate IP address, etc. I haven't seen this discussed anywhere in
connection w/ the null modem cable, including the LDP. Any thoughts?
Alternative 2: Just open up the serial port and use the equivalent of 2
terminal programs (1 each) to move files back and forth. I haven't seen
this discussed either in connection w/ the null modem cable.
Thoughts?
Answers cc'd by email would be appreciated as well as to the group.
Thx,
Jeremy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Redirect packets to web server
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 07:54:18 GMT
Thanks for your reply. I configured Apache to listen to 23.24.25.26:80 as
well as 192.168.0.2:80. I still cannot bring up my web page by typing my net
ip into a browser.
In addition to using Listen 23.24.25.26, I configured my router first with:
ipchains -A input -p tcp -s 23.24.25.26 80 -j REDIRECT -d 192.168.0.2 80
This didn't work, so I tried an
ipchains -A forward -p tcp -s 0/0 80 -j MASQ -d 192.168.0.2 80
Which didn't work either.
Not sure if I'm barking up the right tree here ...
In article <UMfK2.7572$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tom Neilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : Hi, hoping someone can help me,
>
> : I've got a gateway running linux connected to an ADSL connection. I use an
> : ipchain MASQ to allow my 192.169.x.x boxes to use the internet. One of
these
> : boxes is running linux with Apache. All of my internal boxes can bring up
my
> : web page by typing the IP address of the www server into a browser
> : (192.168.0.2). I need Apache to service requests from the internet.
>
> : I figured the best way to do this would be to create an INPUT ipchain on the
> : gateway. So I tried this with the following command (with xx being my net
> : ip):
>
> : ipchains -A input -p tcp -s xx.xx.xx.xx 80 -j REDIRECT -d 192.168.0.2 80
>
> : Didn't work. Outside addresses cannot make a connection with the www
server.
> : Beyond this, I tried a billion other things and every variation of each that
I
> : could come up with.
>
> : Any help would be appreciated ...
> : Ryan C
>
> : -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> : http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
> # Listen: Allows you to bind Apache to specific IP addresses and/or
> # ports, in addition to the default. See also the VirtualHost command
>
> #Listen 3000
> Listen 192.168.2.1:80
> Listen 192.168.2.2:80
> Listen 192.168.2.3:80
> Listen 24.64.187.134:80
>
> --
> "Due to financial constraints,
> the light at the end of the tunnel
> has been turned off until further notice !!"
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 23:57:18 -0500
From: Yahya Darboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: After Samba installation
I installed Samba 2.0 and now I can't ftp to my Linux box from either 98
and NT.
Other than that everything seems to be working just fine.
Can someone please help?
Thanks in advance
Yahya
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
