Linux-Networking Digest #634, Volume #10 Thu, 25 Mar 99 22:13:49 EST
Contents:
Re: DNS+ISP=broken network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
modem sharing? ("T. Jahn")
Re: Advice on NIC's and hubs ("Patrick Rea")
Linux, DHCP, and cable modems... (Doug O'Leary)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ("D. C. Sessions")
Re: Cannot FTP out thru a IPMASQ setup ("Eugene")
Re: Apache Server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Direct connect two linux computers: something's wrong (Georg Oehl)
wake-on-lan and magic packet (Lenz Florian)
Re: Too Frequent Dial ( DNS/Ipfwadm/Diald) ("D. C. Sessions")
Re: Routing from Linux through an NT server ("Chris Lightfoot")
Re: Can Linux Do This ??? ("Patrick Rea")
Re: Static address and domain name: What joins them together?
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: winmodems (Paul Carver)
IPCHAINS Firewalling ("Gawain Lynch")
3Com 3c905 with BootRom Chip causes problems with IDE drive (Sean Seeley)
100BaseT Ethernet card (Jason)
Re: X server and XDM (Wasim Juned)
Telnet connection over LAN takes for over ("Matt G")
Re: LPD print jobs from AIX -> LINUX failing (LAIX Software Consulting)
Re: NFS Client for NT ("Eugene")
Ip Alliasing (Cyberwing)
Problems with Telnet ("David P. Cook")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DNS+ISP=broken network
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 01:21:28 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Mead) wrote:
> >[a lot of stuff about cacheing and DNS not working with dynamic IP's]
> >
> >If you're going to set up a domain, do it right. Get a static IP.
> >
> >-Bill Clark
> Note that I don't anticipate anyone ever calling into this network so
> I don't care too much about other DNS servers and caches (except,
> maybe as they break or enable ftp call-back).
In that case, DDNS should work just fine for you (that's what it's "supposed"
to be used for anyway -- internal DNS or limited use external DNS).
> And quickly, I'm not going the IP-Masq route of putting the Linux box
> on the net because I need to ftp frequently from the Windows boxes and
> I understand that IP-Masq breaks certain programs like ftp that need
> to "call-back"?
FTP only needs two-way access for "Passive" mode, which is generally a bad
feature to be using anyway (a lot of FTP servers and firewall configurations
-- from the server side -- have trouble with passive FTP).
The only other common applications that I know of that require the server to
open a socket connection to the client are games (which is a good enough
reason, if you ask me :).
> Your advice is very much appreciated. Sorry for the length.
No problem. I hope this was of help.
> -Alan Mead
-Bill Clark
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "T. Jahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: modem sharing?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 23:09:10 +0100
Hello world!
Is there a possibility to share a modem connected to a linux server, so
that i.e. W9x users can access it via tcp/ip?
Thank you in advance!
bye & cus,
Tobias Jahn
_________________________________________
Linux - Where do you want to go tomorrow?
------------------------------
From: "Patrick Rea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Advice on NIC's and hubs
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:02:08 -0500
Erik wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I plan on purchasing a number of network cards and a hub (5-8 port).
>I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions or recommendations
>as to what cards will work well under linux, as well as win98 machines.
>I'm interested in 10/100 Nics along with an autosensing 10/100 hub.
>Any recommendations or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>thanks,
I am a big fan of the D-Link Hubs, DSH-8 10/100 and then an extra Uplink
port. I think they list for $155 in the US. Here in Toronto, I can find them
for about $310
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug O'Leary)
Subject: Linux, DHCP, and cable modems...
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:17:55 -0600
Help
I'm having some problems getting dhcp to work with a cable modem.
The particulars are: Redhat Linux ver 5.1 (2.0.34), Mediaone
cable with a cable modem called CyberSurfer Wave.
I originally started out at Linux kernel 2.0.34; and, in the process
of troubleshooting this ugliness upgraded to kernel 2.0.36.
I have a 3c509b that seems to work using the 3c509 device driver;
I've been able to configure an IP address into it and ping myself.
DHCP seems to be causing some problems, however. When booting, DHCP
times out even though I have a link light on the cable modem from
the 10baseT card in my PC. While the link light is on, the command
"ifconfig eth0" looks like:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:03:04:D0
inet addr:0.0.0.0 Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:0.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
After a set amount of time, the link light will go out, and
the output from ifconfig looks like:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:03:04:D0
inet addr:0.0.0.0 P-t-P:0.0.0.0 Mask:0.0.0.0
BROADCAST DEBUG LOOPBACK POINTOPOINT NOTRAILERS NOARP PROMISC
ALLMULTI SLAVE MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
I know the card and (a variant of) dhcp works because I can get
on the net with no problems from win95; Linux, though, is causing
me some headaches.
Any hints on where I should look next?
Thanks for your time and help.
Doug O'Leary
--
==============
Douglas K. O'Leary
Senior System Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============
------------------------------
From: "D. C. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:04:02 -0700
:P wrote:
>
> we use flower name here (using local flower name)
>
> Toth Henrik wrote:
> >
> > > Character names (tom, jerry, moe, larry...)
> >
> > I used characters from the Simpsons, choosing the right one
> > depending on the task of that PC.
> > So Homer is not working 24hours, in spite of Flanders, who
> > is my mailserver. The last one is Lisa, but I'm too supersticious
> > to use Bart for the next.
Several not previously mentioned:
* Movies -- Casablanca, Footloose (laptop), Vertigo, etc.
* Monsters -- Cyclops, Hydra, Vampire, Basilisk, etc.
* Military -- the Navy has ship classes with themes. Plagiarize.
* Mythology -- Hercules, Thor, Theseus, Brunhilda, etc.
* Astronomy -- Casiopaea, Orion, Scorpio, etc.
--
D. C. Sessions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cannot FTP out thru a IPMASQ setup
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:00:08 GMT
You need to load ftp module
modprobe ip_masq_ftp
(not sure if the name is correct, look in /lib/modules)
--
"Ein Folk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
HLEE PRSN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm a LINUX newbie and I've been having a problem where all the computers
> here seem to not be able to issue FTP commands. We are able to enter into
> an FTP site fine (username and password authentification goes through
> successfully) however, issuing a command such as "ls" returns an error
> message stating "Port argument must be 1025 or greater/Can't build data
> connection: Connection refused". Does this error have to do with a
setting
> in my inetd.conf file (it's throwing wild shots since I'm not sure at
all)?
> If this is inherent with my IPMASQ implementation, where can I get into to
> turn it off or modify it? I imagine standard FTP commands carry out
through
> ports lower than 1025.... so is there any workaroudn to this?
>
> Thanks ahead of time. You may email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED](x) (take out the
> "(x)" when replying). Deeply appreciate it!
>
> -Howard-
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Apache Server
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:20:35 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joachim Stengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if I'm at the rigth place (is there another newsgroup for
> Apache?), but perhaps someone can help me!
> I'm trying to configure the Apache server 1.3.2 and I want to have a
> separate logfile for each day.
> If I add the line 'TransferLog |rotatelogs.exe logfilename 86400' to the
> httpd.conf, I get a logfile per day - but that day ends at 1:00 am the
> next day, not at 0:00 am.
create the following script:
--
#!/bin/sh
LOGFILE="(whatever the path to your logfile is)"
cp $LOGFILE $LOGFILE.yesterday
cat /dev/null > $LOGFILE
--
Set it to run at midnight, by typing 'crontab -e' and adding the following
line to your crontab: 0 * * * * (whatever the path to the script is)
That should do it.
-Bill Clark
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Georg Oehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Direct connect two linux computers: something's wrong
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 03:15:15 +0100
Hi there,
I've got a problem with a two Ethernet card setup.
Currently, I have computer "A" equipped with an ISDN card (ippp0) for
establishing a dial-up connection to the Internet. It's also got an
Ethernet card (eth0) to connect to a LAN. It has squid and the TIS
Firewall Toolkit installed and everything is working just hunky-dory.
I've set up a second computer now (let's call it "B"), which I want to
eventually take over computer A's firewall and ISDN Internet connection
and connected it to computer "A" via a direct connection.
Since all this is fairly new to me, I wanted to start by doing one thing
at a time and first see if I could get a connection between "A" and "B".
So, they are both connected via an ethernet cable (with two T-adapters
and two terminators on each end). "ifconfig" recognizes both installed
Ethernet cards just fine, I can successfully ping the localhost on each
machine as well as ping each machine's own IP number, however pinging
the other machine yields no result (100% packet loss).
I suspect that I'm doing something fundamentally wrong with the routing
configuration, but I just can't figure it out.
What does the routing table entry have to look like to get connected to
the other computer respectively ?
Currently I have "A"'s "route.conf" file read:
========== Begin route.conf on "A" ==============
# default 192.168.0.1
<static IP-no> 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
ippp0
192.168.1.3 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth1
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
eth0
default <static IP-no>
========== End route.conf on "A" ==============
"B"'s "route.conf" file reads:
========== Begin route.conf on "B" ==============
192.168.1.4 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth0
default 192.168.1.4
========== End route.conf on "B" ==============
"A"'s eth1 IP-address is 192.168.1.4 and "B"'s eth0 IP-address is
192.168.1.3.
I'm using Linux 2.0.36 (SuSE 6.0 distr.).
What am I doing wrong ?
Georg
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 10:36:41 +0100
From: Lenz Florian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: wake-on-lan and magic packet
Hi there,
does anyone know about a linux-software for sending a 'magic packet' to
wake up a maschine with a wake-on-lan compliant nic.
--
Florian Lenz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "D. C. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Too Frequent Dial ( DNS/Ipfwadm/Diald)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 18:09:33 -0700
craig somerville wrote:
>
> Red Hat Linux release 5.1 (Manhattan)
> Kernel 2.0.35 on an i486
> ISP = Demon
> Problem:= PPP line comes up at random?
>
> My local network comprises a number of win95 boxes and a linux based
> server.
> (a) All internal connections are ok
> (b) Diald seems to work as advertised
> (c) Dialmon/Dctrl work also
> (d) Everyone can access the internet through the linux box, so whats the
> problem?
>
> Well apart from the actual requests when the link comes up and down when
> requested by the win95 users it also is coming up at various times with
> obvious user promptingno win95 user shown in the dialmon queue. I believe
> that this indicates that it is the linux box itself bringing the link up.
>
> e.g. at every boot the link comes up
> at frequently throught the day the link comes up and down after only around
> 40 - 50 seconds of traffic. No Windows user is activly requesting access,
> no windows users are shown in the dialmon queue either ?
>
> I belive that it is related to DNS but cannot quantify it further.
This went away when I turned off innd, which was trying to poll a
default news server at uu.net
To make sure, just
grep pppd /var/log/messages | tail -40
and see what turns up, esp. right after a phantom phone call.
--
D. C. Sessions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Chris Lightfoot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing from Linux through an NT server
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:18:53 -0000
Adam C. Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a machine running Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 connected to a
> private LAN (10.0.0.0) on which is a box running NT Server 4
> with a PPP link to our ISP. The NT Server has forwarding on,
> and the Windows 95 machines also on the network can reach the
> ISP, yet after doing:
> route add -net default gw 10.0.0.1
> all my packets are dropped.
> The Linux machine is getting its IP address and all that via DHCP
> from the NT Server.
You need proxying or similar. IP forwarding will be trying to forward your
private-origin traffic onto the internet, where it will be dropped by the
first router it comes to.
Alternatively, invert your configuration, and run the linux box in
masquerading mode (IP-Masq HOWTO).
--
Chris Lightfot
cwrl2 at nospam dot com dot geocities
remove nospam and put domain in network order to reply
------------------------------
From: "Patrick Rea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can Linux Do This ???
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 21:15:21 -0500
Luca Filipozzi wrote in message ...
<clip>
>I have ADSL. I get 3.1Mbps download (telco has a java-based test
>program). I don't have numbers on my upload speed. It costs
>CA$65.00/month and includes one dynamically assigned ip address and five
>email accounts. It does not include the "telephone service". Just the
>"data service". I *must* have the "telephone service" in order to get the
>"data service". The "telephone service" is CA$24.00/month. So, at
>C$90.00/month, I have voice (which I am forced into) and data. A little
>steep, maybe... but the bandwidth is great :).
That doesn't sound like Sympatico!! Here in Ontario you are limited to the 1
Meg modem. But I do like the added bandwidth over my old 56K line. At the
moment I just have my Win95 machine on it. I have another machine in the
process of being built at the office ( when I get time!) and as soon as I
do, I'll dro the network cards into it and away I go.
>Sadly, the telco is running ads on the television offering a second phone
>line and dial-up Internet service for CA$55.00/month to people who are
>"on-line" a lot. Since ADSL isn't advertised at all, people end up going
>with the second phone line and get a measly 56kbps link!!! Of course,
>profits are the driving motivation behind this marketing ploy.
Be thankful. That'll stop them from filling up the bandwidth as fast. My
parents are on a Sympatico dial-up (33.6 on Win 3.1) and I was the one to
tell them about the DSL.
>my CA$0.02's worth (that's around US$0.013)
Tell me about it.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Static address and domain name: What joins them together?
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:02:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Cripe) wrote:
> First, I can hardly believe that I have to ask this question, but I just
> can't quite be sure I've got it right.
Better to ask and possibly look stupid than continue in ignorance. I don't
think a failure to understand the DNS qualifies as "stupid", though. :)
> I have a registered domain name and a static IP address on a DSL line.
> What is it exactly that tells the world that that domain and address are
> intended to go together?
That is the main purpose of the (D)omain (N)ame (S)ystem.
More information can be found in RFC1033, RFC1034, and RFC1035. These RFC's
(or [R]equest [F]or [C]omments) can be found at http://www.faqs.org.
> Having read the DNS-HOWTO it appears that correctly configuring named
> should do the trick, but is that really it?
Mostly. You also need to notify the Internic what the _two_ DNS servers for
your domain are. Only one is required to run DNS, but the Internic requires
you to register a secondary DNS server (which never actually has to be in
working order after the initial registration).
> If it is, then it would sure be easy for someone to "piss in the routing
> pool", so to speak. What prevents another site from snatching your domainname,
> address, etc.?
Addresses are handled seperately from names. There is actually nothing
preventing somebody from "stealing" your IP address, but it's unlikely that
any traffic will get routed to it. Advertising a route is a very public
thing, and anyone trying to steal an address in this matter would be ignored
if unsuccessful and caught very quickly if successful. In other words, don't
worry about that part.
Theft of domain names is prevented by the Internic registration I mentioned
above. A properly configured DNS server will check with the Internic to find
out what the "Authoritative" server for a given domain is. So long as that's
your server, you'll be fine.
> I need to tell the Internet that my domain has a new address, and to stop
> using the old one.
What you mean is that your domain's primary DNS server has a new address --
the Internic has absolutely no idea what the IP address of any of your
servers are. Your DNS server(s) can be in a completely different domain, in a
completely different IP block from the rest of your machines, if you wanted.
The sole purpose of Internic registration is to identify what DNS server is
"Authoritative" for a given domain. Whatever IP addresses the DNS server
spits out in response to name queries at that point is entirely up to whoever
is running the machine.
There's a simple OnLine form at the Internic that will allow you to change
your primary and secondary DNS entries. The internic can be found at
http://www.internic.net/
-Bill Clark
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Carver)
Subject: Re: winmodems
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 04:06:42 GMT
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 16:37:26 -0500, "batags"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have installed RH 5.2 and have set up ppp0 through linuxconf, But I still
>can't get connected to my isp. I have all the info from my isp <like
>gateway-primary dns-sec dns> But I still can't hear the modem dialing up or
>even get connected. I have a UsRobotics 56k Winmodem, Could that be my
>problem? And if it is, is there a way to solve it without getting a new
>modem? Any help will be appreciated
>Thanks
>Bu||
>
I know the Linux community thinks poorly of Winmodems and many people
believe that winmodems shouldn't be supported on Linux even if the
manufacturers released the information necessary to write Linux
drivers. I read an article that suggested that software modems may be
the wave of the future however. The author based this assertion on the
increasing power of CPUs in single user machines and there may be some
sense in his position. The processing power to "modem" at 56K is
relatively constant. As CPU continue to increase it will take a
smaller and smaller percentage of the CPU's power to do the "modem"
work. Isn't there a point where it becomes silly to use a dedicated
modem processor to do work that the CPU can do without adding
noticeable load? Might we see a day when you can't buy a hardware
modem?
------------------------------
From: "Gawain Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IPCHAINS Firewalling
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 13:34:29 +1100
I have a public C class network which is connected via a Linux router to the
internet.
The problem I have is exactly how to set up the chains and rules...
We need to have dns, ftp, smtp and http incomming to 2 internal IP addresses
and we want to be able to surf, ping, IRC etc from internally.
So, if anyone has already figured out this damn puzzell can you let me know
how you did it.
Cheers.
Gawain Lynch
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sean Seeley)
Subject: 3Com 3c905 with BootRom Chip causes problems with IDE drive
Date: 25 Mar 1999 22:20:39 -0400
Does anyone use bootrom chips on 3Com cards with Linux?
When the bootrom chips is on the card the kernel complains
about not being able to determine harddrive information
during boot.
Everything works fine without the bootrom.
Anyone have any ideas on how to get Linux to work with the
chip on the card?
Thanks,
Sean
------------------------------
From: Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 100BaseT Ethernet card
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 09:03:27 -0500
This may be more of a hardware question but...
Does anyone know if there is some way to fool a 100BaseT ethernet card
into using a 10BaseT cabling and hub connection? I've checked the
pinouts that are around on the net and as far I as can see there are
simply more conductors.
Please email me (there are 26,000+ messages in this group) if you know
anything about this.
Jason
------------------------------
From: Wasim Juned <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: X server and XDM
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:20:24 GMT
Michael wrote:
> when I have xdm running on my rh5.1 machine, it reads/writes the hard drive
> every few seconds, even when there are no x server connections to it. This
> is really annoying, as it prevents me from sleeping, not to mention is
> probably "bad" for the hard drive. Any suggestions?
I doubt that this is xdm.
Usually such disk activity is caused by sync and flush to disk activity.
Look in "/etc/inittab" and change the update line to your preference:
ud::once:/sbin/update -s xxx -f xxx
Read "man update" to set xxx.
Another thing you can do is set the disk parameters using "hdparms".
i.e you can make the drive spin down after x secs.
Cheers Wasim.
--
Wasim Juned
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Matt G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Telnet connection over LAN takes for over
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:21:53 -0000
When using Telnet or FTP to my Linux machine over my LAN I have to wait over
a minute to get a connection. Onc connected it communicates instantly?
anyone have any ideas?
Realtive newbie...
Matt
------------------------------
From: LAIX Software Consulting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: LPD print jobs from AIX -> LINUX failing
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:50:57 GMT
Try an iptrace to confirm the print job is making it over to the Linux server:
iptrace -a -b -p 515 -s aixIP -d LinuxIP /tmp/trace
Send the two jobs
kill the iptrace
ipreport /tmp/trace > /tmp/report
The /tmp/report will show you the IP traffic exchanged to/from port 515 and
should let you know if the job made it over to the server OK.
Regards,
Paul
Zing Zing Awungshi Shishak wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a problem LPD printing from AIX (4.3.2.0) to a remote printer on a
> Linux box(red hat 5.0).
>
> If I send two print jobs (both postscript btw) from AIX in quick succession
> to the remote queue (setup raw w/ no filter) on the linux box only the
> first job prints and the other disappears.
>
> An lpq -P<rp>, on the linux box showed that only the first job was received,
> but I then used a filter to redirect the job to a file and the file
> contained both jobs (interestingly, cat - > /dev/lp0 in the filter did not
> work... only the first job came through, so much for a quick fix.)
>
> Well, I have a feeling either LINUX or AIX has incorrectly supported the
> lpd protocol and was wondering if anyone has heard of this or if there is
> a fix somewhere.
>
> TTTTTTIA
> zing
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS Client for NT
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 02:53:13 GMT
it's easier to just set up samba on the Linux box
see www.samba.org
--
"Ein Folk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7dd35n$35m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Does anybody know a good NFS Client for Windows NT to access
> my Linux NFS Server ?
>
> If possible it should be free !
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:19:39 +0100
From: Cyberwing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ip Alliasing
Hi
Does anyone know more about Ip Aliasing or any Infopages in the WWW
Thank�s
cyberwing
------------------------------
From: "David P. Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problems with Telnet
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 20:58:14 -0800
I have so far successfully go the eth0 interface set up and I am able to
ping both
NT and linux machines. I also can telnet from linux over to the NT box. But
when it
comes to telneting into the Linux box I have a problem. When I try to
Telnet into
my Linux box I get this
Red Hat Linux Release 5.2 (Apollo)
Kernel 2.0.36 on an i486
Then after 60 seconds the I lost connection. No username prompt comes up..
The only place I can think of where the problem is, is with the hosts.allow
and hosts.deny files.. I have hosts.allow set up as follows
ALL:169.254.50.151
This is the IP address for my nt box.. The hosts.deny file is empty..
I also tried deleteing the hosts.allow file per a request of somebody at
work and the problem still presists.
I hope I gave enough information. I would appreciate any help and
suggestions.
Thanks,
Dave
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
