Linux-Networking Digest #634, Volume #11         Wed, 23 Jun 99 10:13:44 EDT

Contents:
  Re: WIN95 -> Linux box on Serial port! (James Stafford)
  About secondary name server ("Lim")
  Re: Linux w/Win clients on a corporate server (Mike Jagdis)
  Re: IP masq/ADSL modem? ("Andrey Smirnov")
  Re: CGI displays raw HTML code? (Ville Nummela)
  Re: HELP! Someone's hacked into... (Ville Nummela)
  Re: How to define webspace? (Ville Nummela)
  tulip_cb ("Curt")
  Samba Questions.... ("Mark")
  RH5.2 won't detect my NIC (Jason Peacock)
  Re: Network Card Collisions (Lew Pitcher)
  Re: (Q) Seeing if Ethernet is working (Ville Nummela)
  Re: ipautofw??? (Drew)
  Re: Identd -- necessary? (Tom Holub)
  Re: Sharing shares across the Internet .. possible ?? (Ted Potter)
  Re: Identd -- necessary? ("Tony C")
  Re: Network numbering question... ("Wyzelli")
  Re: triggering pppd through external phone call ("Stuart Low")
  DNS Config ("R. Alcazar")
  Netscape hangs on boot ("R. Alcazar")
  Re: SV: D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card (Chem-R-Us)
  Cable modem not working... (compe)
  Re: SV: D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card (Chem-R-Us)
  Re: WIN95 -> Linux box on Serial port! (Ben Brown)
  Win95 msg - "This computer name is invalid" ("Martin McCann")

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: James Stafford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: WIN95 -> Linux box on Serial port!
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 04:36:31 -0700

Lyndon Hills wrote:

> Ferdinand V. Mendoza wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> > My problem now is
> > how do I configure the Windows
> > side to do a null modem networking.
> > Someone can help, please.
> > TIA.
> >
> > Ferdinand
> This should be an option in Accessories. if it isn't there then it is an
> install option from the windows CD. Search help for Direct Connection.

Believe it or not the com program in MS Works works real good to use with
Linux and a null modem.

jamess


------------------------------

From: "Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: About secondary name server
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 19:43:46 +0800

Hello,
I have two servers running with bind 8.2 (primary & secondary), I use
nslookup to check each server is worked. But I still have a problem, when I
add a new record in a zone file at primary server and update the serial
number, but secondary server do not update the new zone file.
Any help would be more than appreciated.  Thanks



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Jagdis)
Subject: Re: Linux w/Win clients on a corporate server
Date: 23 Jun 1999 11:14:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josh Flechtner wrote:
>    Ive opted to purchase a Dell2300 Poweredge server running only
>RedHat 6.0, preinstalled, as the OS. Now the other 15 clients will be
>running either Win95 (mostly),Win98 or WinNT. It seems from previous
>newsgroup postings that saMBa is the "bridge" between Linux and Windoze,
>so they can both co-exist peacefully.
>    Has anybody (and I know your out there) attempted this process. If
>so, what advice, documentation, sites, etc... can you provide a
>reference or guidence. Drop me a line and thanks!

Uh... Get samba, install it, read the excellent and copious
documentation that comes with it.

                                Mike

-- 
    A train stops at a train station, a bus stops at a bus station.
    On my desk I have a work station...
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
|  Mike Jagdis                  |  Internet:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
|  Roan Technology Ltd.         |                                      |
|  2 Markham Mews, Broad Street |  Telephone:  +44 118 989 0403        |
|  Wokingham ENGLAND            |  Fax:        +44 118 989 1195        |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'

------------------------------

From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP masq/ADSL modem?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:09:35 -0700

It's not cable modem!

Read the question!

Luke Scharf wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>How smart is the cable modem?  Will it broadcast all of your local
>traffic on the cable network?
>
>If the cable modem is smart, or if you use a conventional modem to
>transmit, you could just run two IP addresses on your one ethernet
>card.  There's a howto somewhere on how to set up a multi homed system.
>
>Your two IP addesses would be whatever your ISP assigns, and an address
>in the range one of the following ranges:
>192.168.*.*, subnet mask 255.255.0.0
>10.*.*.*, subnet mask 255.0.0.0
>
>The other machines on your local networks should have addresses in the
>same range.  you can pretty much assign them arbitrarily, just so long
>as you don't use addresses at the beginning and end of the range.
>
>Read the HOWTOs and good luck.
>
>-Luke
>
>TURBO1010 wrote:
>>
>> I think you would have to have 2 nic cards on the linux box, one for the
>> outside, with the real IP, and one for the internal lan, with the fake
IP.
>> That's the way that I have mine setup at home, and it works great.




------------------------------

From: Ville Nummela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CGI displays raw HTML code?
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 13:49:38 +0300

On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, XuYifeng wrote:

> output
>    Content-Type: text/html
> as you first line.

And two line feeds too.

-- 
 |   No matter how hard you push and no matter what the priority,   |
 |        you can't increase the speed of light.  - RFC 1925        |



------------------------------

From: Ville Nummela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP! Someone's hacked into...
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:47:08 +0300

On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, DonJr wrote:

> If LILO was secured most likely the following is also true so:
> 
>  How to you boot another 'root-fs' if the removable devices have been
> disabled as possible boot targets in the BIOS and the BIOS is Password
> Locked?
> 
> Why lock the front door if your going to leave the sliding glass door
> beside it open?

Really just a waste of time. "oh no, this machine can't be booted from a
floppy!" "Don't panic son, watch" "snip, snip, snip (the sound from
opening the case and removing the hard drive" "Ok, let's go home.."

-- 
 |         ViGe / gasp inc. | http://www.lut.fi/~vnummela           |
 |                 Signatureen kuuluva hauska teksti                |


------------------------------

From: Ville Nummela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to define webspace?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:02:01 +0300

On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, craigw wrote:

> I'm just learning how to administrate a web server properly.  How do you
> define how much web space each individual user gets?

One word: quota.


-- 
 |           ViGe / gasp inc. | http://www.lut.fi/~vnummela         |
 |         "Bother," said Pooh, and deleted his message base.       |


------------------------------

Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tulip_cb
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 06:23:24 -0500

Does anyone know if the tulip_cb.o module is available yet for 2.0.36 ?
If I upgrade to 2.2.X, is it a part of the pcmcia package?

Thanks



------------------------------

From: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba Questions....
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 05:34:08 GMT

I am a NT Tech who is playing with Linux and Samba for the first time. I am
pretty sure everything is configured properly, except for two usability
issues:

The first issue is I would like to know how to browse my NT servers from the
Linux box. Is there a Samba browsing utility I am missing?

Second, I have read and write access configured for each user, in their own
directory which is created when you create the local linux account, but this
only allows for file storage. How can users be given access to each other's
folders for file sharing?

Any help is greatly appreciated...

Mark Bitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Peacock)
Subject: RH5.2 won't detect my NIC
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:04:45 GMT

Hello.

I've installed RH5.2 and wanted to try a simple home network between
it and my Win98 machine.  Everything installed fine except that for
some reason, when I would go into X, run linuxconf, and go into the
networking section, I would have to manually activate my eth0
connection even though it was set to activate at boot time.  Then
after I close the networking menu and reopen it, it would be
deactivated again.  Whenever I would call linuxconf through the xterm
window without a trailing "&" behind it, and then choose to activate
eth0, it gave me the message saying "eth0 delayed" - and then later
"no such device eth0" (or something to the effect of these msgs)..

So I had the idea to try and do a reinstall of RH through a Win98
shared drive.  I created the supplemental disk it said I required and
when prompted to choose a networking card, I chose the NE2000
compatible ISA card.  I let it autoprobe it only to see that it could
find no such device.  I read the card's manual and tried to specify
the i/o address and irq info of the card to RH but it still could not
find the card.

The card I am using is a Kingston Technologies KNE20T ISA PNP NIC.
My Win98 machine has an identical card and locates it fine.  I have a
RJ-45 cable running between the machines.  The card is noted to be
100% software compatible with Novell's NE2000 compliant series
Ethernet adapter drivers.

Is there any way I can make Linux detect this card? Since I'm trying
to do it from the install now, preferrably what I can do in this area
to get it running.

Any help is GREATLY appreciated.

Thank You

Jason

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Network Card Collisions
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:28:36 GMT

Collisions are a natural and expected part of Ethernet (CSMA/CD)
They happen when two (or more) ethernet NICs try to transmit at the
same time. There's logic in the ethernet hardware to accomodate this,
and transmission retry occurs accordingly.

On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:38:38 +0800, Martin Ng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Does any one know about the cause of collision of network card?  I can
>see a number of collision when issuing 'ifconfig'.
>I suspect that it is the cause of why I telnet to it very slowly.
>
>Regards,
>Martin
>


Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
Toronto Dominion Bank

([EMAIL PROTECTED])


(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)

------------------------------

From: Ville Nummela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: (Q) Seeing if Ethernet is working
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 10:13:25 +0300

On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Gregory D. Horne wrote:

> > Is there any way of knowing if one's Ethernet is connected
> > which does not assume that IP addresses are properly set up?
> At the command prompt:
> $ ping localhost
> This should respond with successful acknowledgements if the card is in
> fact installed and being recognized by Linux.  Of course this does
> assume IP is enabled on your system which in Linux is the default.

No no no no! Connections to "localhost" are made through the loopback
device - therefore it works even if you have no network card at all!


-- 
 |   [EMAIL PROTECTED] work: +358-5-4125389 home: +358-40-5075560     |        
 |         ViGe / gasp inc. | http://www.lut.fi/~vnummela           |
 |                 Signatureen kuuluva hauska teksti                |


------------------------------

From: Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: ipautofw???
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:59:59 +1000


I get exactly the same thing, I'm running Slackware 3.5 kernel 2.2.10
ip masq etc.. all work fine.

Drew.

On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Devon Harding wrote:

> When I run ipautofw, I get this
> 
> [root@mars rc.d]# ipautofw -A -r tcp 47624 47624 -h 192.168.0.1
> setsockopt: Protocol not available
> 
> I'm running RH5.2
> 
> -Devon
> 
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Holub)
Subject: Re: Identd -- necessary?
Date: 22 Jun 1999 14:24:02 -0700

In article <7kot5p$652$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
)
)(After further research, it looks like identd is used mainly by IRC, for
)which I have no use; and sendmail, for which I do.  Will turning it off
)break mail transport?  I'm reluctant to experiment, since the machine in
)question is the company's Internet gateway.) 

identd allows remote sites to ask what user on your site initiated a 
particular connection; someone initiates an SMTP connection, for example,
and the remote host contacts your identd to find out the user id (or
similar information) that did it.

It's not necessary for sendmail transport, though it could theoretically
provide you with useful information if someone on your machine did something
annoying/illegal via SMTP.
 -Tom

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:38:52 +0000
From: Ted Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sharing shares across the Internet .. possible ??

While we don't do this across the internet we do dial in to the local lan
via ppp - using
samba to allows to "share" drives. Client uses a winx database application
and connects
to the machine with the data file.
Can't help you with security concerns - I no nothing about that area.



Dann Church wrote:

> You can share a filesystem across the internet using NFS, but for the
> "Network Neighborhood" stuff, I think you need to run Samba.  Haven't
> played with Samba at all myself, but I'm sure that there's some good
> HOWTO's on it.
>
> --Dann Church
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if it is possible to share my system across the
> > Internet ? What would be nice is if someone could just add me to their
> > Network Neighborhood and treat me like a regular drive.  With cable
> > modem or ADSL, I don't think speed would be critical, and would VPN
> > cover my security concerns ? Does NFS fill this need ??

--
Ted Potter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
415-479-4548
Linux: because a PC is a terrible thing to waste




------------------------------

From: "Tony C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Identd -- necessary?
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 23:22:07 -0700

Along the same lines, I have a slightly different problem. Identd does not
seem to be located on my RH 5.2 system. Where can I find it? What's
interesting is that inetd.conf references identd for authentication but it's
not on my system. Hmmm

TC

Mike Kozlowski wrote in message <7konr7$12aa$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm trying to tighten up a Linux box, so I'm removing non-essential
>services from inetd.conf.  However, I'm unsure if identd is essential or
>not; reading the man page failed to illuminate.
>
>What do I lose if I turn off identd?
>
>--
>Michael Kozlowski
>http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~mlk/



------------------------------

From: "Wyzelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network numbering question...
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 15:58:24 +0930

Andrey Smirnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7kpr08$e44$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> If your subnet mask is 255.255.255.128 why are you using broadcast address
> of 192.168.1.255?
>
> You should use 192.168.1.127 as a broadcast address and network address
> should be 192.168.1.128.
>
> Good luck!
>
> Kevin Hillabolt wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Does this look like it makes any sense?  Please respond to my email if
> >you can...
> >
> >TIA,
> >Kevin Hillabolt
> >
> >** To reply, remove "nospam" from the return address **
> >
> >
> >*** Network Design ***
> >
> >Broadcast - 192.168.1.255
> >Network address - 192.168.1.0
> >
> >Subnetting - 255.255.255.0  &  255.255.255.128
> >
> >Win98
> >IP 192.168.1.4
> >Broadcast 192.168.1.255
> >Network 192.168.1.0
> >Subnet 255.255.255.128  (Notice the 128 on the end)
> >
> >Win98
> >IP 192.168.1.3
> >Broadcast 192.168.1.255
> >Network 192.168.1.0
> >Subnet 255.255.255.128  (Notice the 128 on the end)
> >
> >Linux  (two network cards, one machine....)
> >ETH1
> >IP 192.168.1.2
> >Broadcast - 192.168.1.255
> >Network  - 192.168.1.0
> >Subnet 255.255.255.128   (Notice the 128 on the end)
> >
> >ETH0
> >IP 192.168.1.1
> >Broadcast - 192.168.1.255
> >Network  - 192.168.1.0
> >Subnet 255.255.255.0   (Notice the zero on the end)
> >

Also the subnet should be the same on all PC's.  Though specifying the
Network and the Broadcast is not necessary, since a correct IP # and Subnet
automatically gives both Network Number and Broadcast Number.

Have you assigned any default gateways?

Wyzelli



------------------------------

From: "Stuart Low" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.dial-up,yale.users.linux
Subject: Re: triggering pppd through external phone call
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 22:48:57 +1000

COME TO THINK OF IT! THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR ME TO!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can you please send me all the details sometime to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIGHT FROM STEP 0 please cause I am only a
beginner...

See ya

Stuart Low

Harald Schwefel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> I have my box at home connected by modem via pppd to the net. Now I want
> to trigger the dial-in process, by calling my machine (e.g. from work)
> via normal telephone line (not from a computer), type some numbercode
> (via toutch-tone) and hang up.
>
> My home box then should dial in and send me an email to an external
> emailaccount with its new IP address, so that I can login myself (i.g.
> from work) and get the data I want.
>
> The dialin through pppd is no problem (I have it triggered though
> requesting a non-local IP adress), but how can I have mgetty watch the
> line and responde to an touchetone message?
>
> Thanks
>
> harald



------------------------------

From: "R. Alcazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DNS Config
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 22:39:37 -0500

Hello All,

I've been attempting to setup DNS on my box running RHL6.0.  Though I may
have succeed in configuring some of the files, I don't believe that it is
functioning properly yet.  I've tried to set it up with resolver-only and
primary configurations.

However, the resources I have been using (DNS-HOWTO & TCP/IP Networking -
Oreilly) leaves me a bit confused.


1.  The HOWTO states that you need to config named.conf and any appropriate
zone files.  Oreilly says you need to config named.boot.  They are different
files and tho I have attempted to config them both, are they both needed?

2.  Setting a single nameserver (working on a LAN) to 127.0.0.1 or the IP
address of the current host also gives me problems.  The only way I can
launch Netscape (from within xwin) is if I set the nameserver to something
other than my host.  Why is this?

3.  When using nslookup my default server is my hostname.hostdomain.  In my
attempt to recreate my mistake a reset all my named conf files to their
original settings.  However, the default server (when using nslookup) still
remains my hostname.hostdomain as opposed to 'localhost.localdomain'.

I'm very close to setting up this DNS.  However, the my resources still
leave me a bit confused.  Any help is appreciated.


R. Alcazar





------------------------------

From: "R. Alcazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netscape hangs on boot
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 00:33:27 -0500

Hello all,

I just configured my DNS (correctly hopefully).  However, when I open up
Netscape (RHL 6.0 - xwin) it hangs and never opens the local RHL page.  When
I change the only nameserver in my resolv.conf to an IP other than a local
one (127.0.0.1 or 172.16.20.1 - my host!) Netscape then opens up fine...

Its quite unusual actually...  but I'm having problems with it.  Can anyone
propose a solution?  Please advise.


R. Alcazar



------------------------------

From: Chem-R-Us <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SV: D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:40:22 GMT



Judith Sunesson wrote:

> I have the same problem as you. In RedHet 5.2 and 6.0 I can't get my d-link
> 220 card to work. But when I use SuSE it works at once.
>
> For use in RH you need to compile a new kernel.

Compile the new kernel as what, may I ask? (I'm using RH 5.1 with quite a few
updates - including kernel 2.2.9)


>
>
> /Judith
>
> DenningL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i
> diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I am using kerenel 2.2.9
> >
> > I am forced to make use of a
> >
> > D-Link 220 PnP ISA Card for a particular network system - no way
> > around it.
> >
> > (The DFE530TX worked great as a via-rine) Thanx Sessions.
> >
> >
> > Now exactly what do I have to do to get this card to work in my
> > Linux box?
> >
> > Boot read out:
> >
> > ISA/PNP
> >
> > Card  Device  DMA  IRQ  Device
> >
> >  1      0      NA   3   D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card
> >
> >
> > All I want to know is what I have to do configure this card to work
> > and how to do it, or just point to the relevant RTFM.
> >
> > Thanx in Advance.
> >
> > Denning

--
Chem-R-Us

Get PGP: http://members.tripod.com/cyberkt/download.htm
RSA: 0xB5A6181D   DH: 0x995C529B



------------------------------

From: compe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Cable modem not working...
Date: 23 Jun 1999 07:30:54 GMT

I have slackware 4.0 installed on my system and I cannot get my cable modem 
to work. To start off www.bresnanlink.net is my ISP, it does not require 
authentication, etc. like rr. I have 2 , that's right, 2 NIC's in my 
computer, due to it being a gateway machine on my network. The first, eth0 
is for the LAN, and the second, eth1 is for the cable modem. It has 
successfully worked under Windows95/98/NT4.0 and even Windows NT5 (2000) 
beta 3, build 2045. It has ALSO worked under Redhat  6.0. However, it 
doesn't want to work under Slackware 4.0. I have been at this 3 days now, 
read all the how-to's, faq's, manpages, have been on IRC the entire time, 
and unfortunatley, NOBODY can tell me what's going on. I have recompiled my 
kernel, included the necessary support for it, both of my NICs are detected 
upon bootup, ifconfig -a shows lo, eth0, and eth1.. my LAN NIC works fine, 
I can ping the other computer on the network without a problem, but when I 
dhcpcd eth1, it timed out and in the /var/log/syslog it says:
"timed out waiting for a valid dhcp server response."
All of my resolv.conf, hosts.conf, rc.d/* is all fine (I am pretty sure). I 
have also tried compiling a newer version fo dhcpcd, however, it requires 
net/ethernet.h and I imagine other header files, which are glibc. Slackware 
4.0 as you know is libc5, and upon installing the glibc package, slackware 
dies on me, and the only way I can reboot my computer is pulling the plug. 
My cards are LinkSys 10/100 PCI cards, no problems with either of them as 
well. I have also tried switching the cables around, aka eth0 is cable 
modem, eth1 is lan. The lan still worked, but nope, cable modem didn't. 
LINUX is LINUX, and I'm certian if it will work under redhat, it WILL work 
under Slackware. I just need to find out HOW. Also another strange feature, 
if I ifconfig eth1 208.154.20.222 (the IP address I'm normally leased) I 
can ping my nameserver, 208.154.20.1, but I cannot ping any foreign IP 
addreses, nor resolve any text hostnames, such as, say www.lycos.com. I 
really can't figure out what's going on here, I've even went and tried 
using 'pump' which someone said to use, unfortunatley it only is available 
in rpm format, so I installed alien, extracted it, then it wouldn't run. 
Another problem on the list. ANY HELP is extremely appriciated, I haven't 
slept in days, and still have found no answers. Thanks.

==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Chem-R-Us <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SV: D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 12:40:42 GMT



Judith Sunesson wrote:

> I have the same problem as you. In RedHet 5.2 and 6.0 I can't get my d-link
> 220 card to work. But when I use SuSE it works at once.
>
> For use in RH you need to compile a new kernel.

Compile the new kernel as what, may I ask? (I'm using RH 5.1 with quite a few
updates - including kernel 2.2.9)


>
>
> /Judith
>
> DenningL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i
> diskussionsgruppsmeddelandet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I am using kerenel 2.2.9
> >
> > I am forced to make use of a
> >
> > D-Link 220 PnP ISA Card for a particular network system - no way
> > around it.
> >
> > (The DFE530TX worked great as a via-rine) Thanx Sessions.
> >
> >
> > Now exactly what do I have to do to get this card to work in my
> > Linux box?
> >
> > Boot read out:
> >
> > ISA/PNP
> >
> > Card  Device  DMA  IRQ  Device
> >
> >  1      0      NA   3   D-Link DE 220 PnP ISA Card
> >
> >
> > All I want to know is what I have to do configure this card to work
> > and how to do it, or just point to the relevant RTFM.
> >
> > Thanx in Advance.
> >
> > Denning

--
Chem-R-Us

Get PGP: http://members.tripod.com/cyberkt/download.htm
RSA: 0xB5A6181D   DH: 0x995C529B



------------------------------

From: Ben Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: WIN95 -> Linux box on Serial port!
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 13:59:00 +0100

If you are using Windows 95 you will need a Null modem .inf driver, one
of which is available from:

http://www.vt.edu:10021/K/kewells/net/mdmcisc2.inf

There is already one included with Windows 98.

Depending on what luck you get with how getty wakes up you may need to
edit you Dial-up networking script on the Windows machine to send a
carraige return before scanning for the ogin: and assword: prompts.

"Ferdinand V. Mendoza" wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> Today I got a Toshiba notebook to play with my
> Linux box. I tried to connect it to one of the
> unused COM ports and I configured mgetty to
> test a terminal log-in. It works.
> Now, I want to use PPP over the same serial port
> (no modem of course) and plan to do some
> benchmarks. I can run a script to fire up PPP
> once the login is successful. My problem now is
> how do I configure the Windows
> side to do a null modem networking.
> Someone can help, please.
> TIA.
> 
> Ferdinand

------------------------------

From: "Martin McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win95 msg - "This computer name is invalid"
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 14:51:21 +0100

Greetings,

   Having spend the last two days fiddling around with samba, I have got it
now to the point that win95 gives the message "This computer name in
invalid". I got very exited at this as it was the first new error message
for several hours, but not I would like to get rid of it :). Any
suggestions?

                Cheers,
                     Martin



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to