Linux-Networking Digest #660, Volume #10 Sun, 28 Mar 99 15:13:54 EST
Contents:
Re: Very slow connection (Andrew Comech)
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (Ewan Dunbar)
Re: Lotus Domino Server Compatible? (ma)
Re: Apache Web server with dynamic IP (EricM)
�p�pMP3, �̷s�n�� , �K�OEMAIL, �ѤUICQ �B�� , Chatroom , �����d���O, NBA99 ,
��@�Ѱ�p�p ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (Byron A Jeff)
Trouble with upgrading kernel (Mogul 55)
Re: 2 entries for eth0 in route table (Bernd-Ulrich Adrigam)
Linux as NT server (Mogul 55)
Re: Help : Ethernet Card (dirk)
Re: Automounting on root? (amd) (dirk)
Question: Is there a free alternetive for TZO and DYNIP? (Jeroen van Reenen)
will trade a 32x cd-rom for AWE64/AWE32 soundcard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DNS problems using Win98/Sygate with RH5.2 (Todd Bordeaux)
Re: email server with web interface ("Frieda Cornet")
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... ("Alexander I. Butenko")
Re: Linux, DHCP, and cable modems... ("Peck R. Wood")
Re: DHCP: Socket: Invalid Option ("Peck R. Wood")
Upgrade to 2.2.0 broke PPP dialup (Nicholas Wolverson)
Can't ping Windows 95 from Redhat Linux 5.2 (Rory Chan)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech)
Subject: Re: Very slow connection
Date: 28 Mar 1999 12:07:04 -0500
In article <7dlkjs$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ahmed Hasan wrote:
>Hello there,
>I connect to the Internet through Linux but the connection is "very very
>slow". It is much slower than the connection throw Windows95. Can you tell
>me what is the problem? Can you help me make it faster?
>
Hi Ahmed,
there are two things to consider:
Are you using the right IRQ? Look up cat /proc/interrupts and
setserial -g /dev/ttyS* and make sure that the modem's IRQ is
not used by anything else.
Are you using the right INIT string? Look up the connection speed
reported after you connect (like CARRIER 26400); is it the one you
expect?
If you modem does not report the connection speed (or says something
like CONNECT 115200 only), try to append S95=44 to the INIT string
and I hope you will see CARRIER XXXX, CONNECT 115200.
Cheese,
Andrew
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,micorosft.public.outlook
From: Ewan Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:57:18 -0500
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999, Alexander I. Butenko wrote:
> ANyway I greatly doubt that Linux will be easier to use than NT Server. I'm
> sure that NT Server will be a ideal use for a small home network, becaus
> eit's very easy to configure comparable to Linux and supports most network
> clients better.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Alexander I. Butenko
>
> Microsoft Certified Professional
> Microsoft Developer Network Certified Member
I don't want to start a flame-war here, but what with the number of bugs
NT has, and its sheer complexity, I think Linux would be a better choice.
The last argument is *quite* arguable, and in my experience, neither of
them are true. No one in any walk of life could have ther lives improved
by NT, and you can quote me on that. Ever noticed the demand for people
like yourself? That's because administrating NT is a *big* job, and more
of a headache than any other system. Around here, I think, we tend to
refrain from giving advice like this.
------------------------------
From: ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Lotus Domino Server Compatible?
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 1999 03:23:48 -0600
J.S. Mammen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have a question, but please pardon me if it is the wrong group.
>
> There is a office setup with WindowsNT and Lotus Notes with Domino
> Server. We would like to remove the NT but
> keep Lotus Notes and Domino Server.
>
> My question
> 1. Is there a Linux port Domino server or Lotus
> 2. If not, is there a compatiable Domino server which can be run on
> Linux OS
> 3. Or is there a server similar to Domino to acomplish the purpose of
> Domino Server
>
> Any help on this matter is appreciated.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Sincerely,
> J.S.Mammen
The Lotus Domino Server Linux port will be in beta soon( 2ndQ or 3rd Q).
m.a.
--
___________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are our own and not the Cranston Organisation
or any of it's subsidiaries. 1999 @ M.A.
------------------------------
From: EricM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache Web server with dynamic IP
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:40:40 -0500
If you have a Dynamic IP, and want to host a Web, FTP or other Internet Server,
you can get a Dynamic DNS solution from someone like TZO.COM
http://www.tzo.com offers a static domain name for a dynamic IP. We have Linux
scripts, as well as Windows, Mac a java client software that sends your Dynamic
IP to our DDNS servers each time the IP changes.
Our software was rated 5 stars by Linuxberg and can also be found on
Freshmeat.net. For more information, you can see http://www.tzo.com or
http://www.dynamicdns.org
A typical TZO Subdomain costs about $25 per year, or $60 per year for a Private
domain name attached to a Dynamic (or Static) IP address.
thanks
-Eric
Diego Terzano wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm kind of new to Linux and I want to set up an http web server using a
> dynamic IP with Apache. How is it done??
> Can anyone refers me to a site or anyone that can provide me with the proper
> information?
>
> I'm using RedHat 5.2 with the kernel 2.2.4
>
> Thanks
--
Eric McIntyre
TZO Internet Naming System
Get TZO and Make a Name for Yourself!
http://www.tzo.com
Your Source for CableModem and xDSL Information
http://www.CableModemInfo.Com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.networks.noctools.bugs,comp.networks.noctools.submissions,comp.networks.noctools.wanted,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc
Subject: �p�pMP3, �̷s�n�� , �K�OEMAIL, �ѤUICQ �B�� , Chatroom , �����d���O, NBA99 ,
��@�Ѱ�p�p
Date: 28 Mar 1999 17:25:24 GMT
�Ҧ�����,
������[ http://www.cyl.com/cyl ] ����
or [ http://come.to/cyl ]
********���update********
1) �K�O EMAIL (@cyl.zzn.com) �ӽ�
2) �̷s [ ���B��B�x ] ���W���� MP3 [ ���update ]
3) �̷s Software ���� & Download
4) " ���ѪB�� " �ѤUICQ �B�� , �Х[�J
5) �����P�� " �����d���O "
6) ���� Chatroom , �n�h Cyber City �� , �k�h�P�A��o�U !
7) NBA 99 , ���U 99 �~ NBA ! �� d �N��
8) �̷s���Whomepage����
9) �̷s�ꥻ�@������ �B����
10) ��@�Ѱ�
[ Love Generation | Long Vacation | �ή� 1 ,2 | Boy Hunt |
| �@�W | With Love | Happy Mania | Beachboy | G.T.O.|
| �P�����f / �� | �������ڷR�A | �W�ҡA�е��ڦh�I�ɶ� | ���ֶ� |
| �������B | �c�@�@���k | �R���C�� ]
11) �̷s�ꥻ�B���W���~����
12) �n�h���� ..............
Webmaster: CYL [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [ http://www.cyl.com/cyl ]
or [ http://come.to/cyl ]
|���update |���update |���update |���update |���update |���update |
�p�pMP3, �̷s�n�� , �K�OEMAIL, �ѤUICQ �B�� , Chatroom , �����d���O, NBA99 ,
��@�Ѱ�p�p
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Byron A Jeff)
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: 28 Mar 1999 12:44:01 -0500
In article <#z0FSqTe#[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robert Moir [MVP] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-
-ERiC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
-news:7dlljq$6qg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]....
-<snip>
-
->
->I run both NT4 Server and Linux at home and anything important (DNS, SOCKS
->etc) runs on a Linux box as I found it easier to do than with NT. Also
-price
->and hardware required favour the Linux route. FYI I have both Linux and
->Windows clients.
->
->I also do not want a war about this though, its just my opinion...
->
->ERiC
-
-And welcome to your opinion you certainly are.
-
-Personally, I am in the NT camp, I find it easier to use than unix or any
-varient thereof, but they are *both* excellant server platforms IMHO. I
-would probably reccomend NT to someone who was asking for a box that was
-easy to use and administer, because in my personal experiance NT has proven
-to be so.
-
-As for stability, well Linux is not the worlds most mature product, and its
-doing very well considering how new it is, but I would hesitate before
-betting the farm on it none the less. As for NT - well I see lots of people
-commenting on how unstable it is, but I can honestly say that they must run
-their servers in a different way from me because my NT servers are rock
-solid and I am very confident in them. Considering the amount of people who
-say NT gives them trouble I wonder what I am doing wrong!
-
-But like I say, either choice is good for a home network. Its pretty much
-down to which one the user prefers getting to grips with.
-
Actually isn't there at least one more consideration? How much does it cost
to set up equivalent functionality with NT Server and Linux. Software cost
only...
BAJ
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mogul 55)
Subject: Trouble with upgrading kernel
Date: 28 Mar 1999 18:37:48 GMT
ok i downloaded the kernel 2.2.4 and installed it on my pc running RedHat 5.2
the installation went fine and i am able to boot up using the new kernel...the
problem is that i cant get my network card configured again... the card is a
kingston (KNE30T) which is a 10BaseT (PCI) NIC. Can Someone help me...I mean
the new kernel is supossed to add more supported devices right? is there
someway to check that the kernel is 100 % correct in setup. Some one please
help
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernd-Ulrich Adrigam)
Subject: Re: 2 entries for eth0 in route table
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 18:17:45 +0200
Hi Pat,
I think that route is setup twice, first by the routine that sets up the
device and
second time by routed, if you have the route defined in /etc/route.conf.
But I think, that it's only cosmetic, because it should be no problem.
Bernd
Pat Neave schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I have two RedHat 5.0 machines both with networking installed and all
running
>fine. However upon doing a route -n I get the following output:
>
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>
>
>Question is, why does eth0 appear twice and is this OK or could it be a
problem
>and how do I fix it.
>
>Any comments/ideas appreciated.
>
>Pat
>--
>- Patrick Neave
>- Lucent Technologies mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mogul 55)
Subject: Linux as NT server
Date: 28 Mar 1999 18:39:37 GMT
i want linux to act as an NT server would. The clients are running Win 98.
The big thing is i want the linux box to validate the users that are on the Win
98 PCs..
Some one please help
Thanks in advance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Help : Ethernet Card
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 16:56:05 +0200
PC wrote:
>
> I'm trying to probe 3COM Etherlink XL 10/100, but it has the following
> error message. Any idea how to fix it? The card works fine on Win98
> on the same machine.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 3c59x.c:v0.99E 5/12/98 Donald Becker
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
> The PCI BIOS has not enabled this device! Updating PCI command
> 0000->0005.
> eth0: 3Com 3c905 Boomerang 100baseTx at 0xfc40, 00:60:08:96:23:2b, IRQ 255
> *** Warning: IRQ 255 is unlikely to work! ***
> 8K word-wide RAM 3:5 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/NWay Autonegotiation
> interface.
> MII transceiver found at address 24, status 7869.
> Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try to change the order of your PCI cards in your system and check your
BIOS messages if some PCI cards share an interupt (and try to disable
this).
Ciao,
Dirk
------------------------------
From: dirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Automounting on root? (amd)
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:00:58 +0200
George Matey wrote:
>
> I am trying to automount onto root "/".
>
> RH 5.2 Intel. NIS and NFS running fine.
> Attempting to use amd from am-utils (6.0).
> I am a NIS/NFS client. The local NIS slave server is Solaris.
Hi,
try to use the automout daemon (kernel based), works much better. This
daemon needs a directory for himself (special, like /proc), but you can
use links in your root directory pointing into the automount directory
...
Ciao,
Dirk
------------------------------
From: Jeroen van Reenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Question: Is there a free alternetive for TZO and DYNIP?
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 21:36:09 +0200
See header.
Jeroen van Reenen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
remove the nospam to mail me
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: will trade a 32x cd-rom for AWE64/AWE32 soundcard
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 18:43:16 GMT
Hey everyone,
I am looking for a decent soundcard, and I have an extra cd-rom drive
not being used. It is a NEC 32x cd-rom, just bought, very good condition.
I would prefer an AWE64, or an AWE32 soundcard in good condition, but I will
look at other offers. E-mail me if interested: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Black Hornet
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:06:57 +0000
From: Todd Bordeaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DNS problems using Win98/Sygate with RH5.2
Hank wrote:
> Last weekend I installed the Mandrake dist of Linux. It include KDE. The
> install went without a hitch except for my network setup.
>
> Here is what I have:
>
> I have a peer to peer network with 2 Win98 boxes and one Linux box. One of
> the Wintel boxes is hooked to my ISDN line and on it is installed Sygate.
> Sygate is a software product that lets me share my ISDN connection. It runs
> as a "service" on the Wintel box and is setup using DHCP protocol.
>
> On my other Wintel machine running as the "client", I didn't have to
> configure anything as the Sygate software automatically assigned IP and took
> care of DNS. But I need to know what I need to set on the Linux box to get
> it to work.
>
> Right now on the Linux box, if I enter the IP of a web site, it will connect
> to the site properly. But if I use the domain name, it times out. That tells
> me the DNS is messed up somewhere.
>
> The techs at Sygate told me all I need to set on the Linux box is an unused
> IP address on my network and the DNS of my ISP. I've done both, but DNS is
> still not working.
>
> I'm pretty much a newbie to this Linux stuff, so if someone could step me
> through what to look for, that would be really appreciated.
>
> Hank
> ___
> Home of Hobby Talk www.hobbytalk.com
> R/C Swap & Sell www.rcswapandsell.com
> R/C Vehicles rcvehicles.miningco.com
Check to make sure that you have a "resolv.conf" file which points at a
functioning name server
Todd Bordeaux
------------------------------
From: "Frieda Cornet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: email server with web interface
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 20:53:42 +0200
What is Imail ??
Knut Hansen heeft geschreven in bericht
<7dlbg4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Hello,
>
>I'm looking for an email server software that does the same
>with Linux that Ipswitch imail does with Windows NT:
>
>- serve mail for multiple domains on one machine
> (so we can have one pop account [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
>a different one [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>- administer domains, pop accounts and aliases via the web
>
>Is there something like that out there, maybe as an extension to
>sendmail or exim?
>
>Greetings
>Knut Hansen
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Alexander I. Butenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 22:19:48 +0300
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,micorosft.public.outlook
Ewan Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.10.9903281050540.5655-100000@superfunhappyslide...
>
> On Sun, 28 Mar 1999, Alexander I. Butenko wrote:
>
> > ANyway I greatly doubt that Linux will be easier to use than NT Server.
I'm
> > sure that NT Server will be a ideal use for a small home network, becaus
> > eit's very easy to configure comparable to Linux and supports most
network
> > clients better.
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Alexander I. Butenko
> >
> > Microsoft Certified Professional
> > Microsoft Developer Network Certified Member
>
> I don't want to start a flame-war here, but what with the number of bugs
> NT has, and its sheer complexity, I think Linux would be a better choice.
Yes, ther eare some bugs, but Microsoft is working hardly on it and thanks
to teh new Security Site Microsof topened recently we now have an extremely
fast reaction of M support personnel. So, if you have SP4 with the latest
hotfixes you hav enothing to worry about secutiry and bugs. Remember that
all NT bugs are nothing comparing to Linux complexity .
> The last argument is *quite* arguable, and in my experience, neither of
> them are true. No one in any walk of life could have ther lives improved
> by NT, and you can quote me on that. Ever noticed the demand for people
I can't :-) Personally me increased my computer knowledge and career option
senough thanks to Microsoft and Windows NT.
> like yourself? That's because administrating NT is a *big* job, and more
> of a headache than any other system. Around here, I think, we tend to
> refrain from giving advice like this.
>
>
But what advices do you expect in the NT newsgroup form the NT
professionals?
--
Please reply to the newsgroup!
Best Regards,
Alexander I. Butenko
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft Developer Network Certified Member
------------------------------
From: "Peck R. Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux, DHCP, and cable modems...
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 18:58:42 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============7982F6AAE744022B2E57B448
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
John Mellor wrote:
>
> What version of dhcpcd are you using? Most @Home host networks require
> that you announce your assigned machine name to them before you get a
> response.
>
> This capability was added to dhcpcd-0.70, with the addition of the
> undocumented -h parameter. Add it to the call, followed by your
> assigned machine name. Without it the dhcp query will time out.
Should I be using dhcpcd-0.70? I'm running slackware with the 2.0.36
kernel and dhcpcd-1.3.17. It doesn't work giving the error:
dhcpStart: socket: Invalid argument.
The docs say the kernel should be compiled with SOCK_PACKET. I can't
find any option for SOCK_PACKET anywhere. If dhcpcd-1.3.17 is only for
later kernels, where do I find dhcpcd-0.70? The site I got the other
version from didn't have it. Once I get it working I can play with
upgrading my kernel and such.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Doug O'Leary) writes:
> |> I'm having some problems getting dhcp to work with a cable modem.
> |> The particulars are: Redhat Linux ver 5.1 (2.0.34), Mediaone
> |> cable with a cable modem called CyberSurfer Wave.
> |>
> |> I originally started out at Linux kernel 2.0.34; and, in the process
> |> of troubleshooting this ugliness upgraded to kernel 2.0.36.
> |>
> |> I have a 3c509b that seems to work using the 3c509 device driver;
> |> I've been able to configure an IP address into it and ping myself.
> |>
> |> DHCP seems to be causing some problems, however. When booting, DHCP
> |> times out even though I have a link light on the cable modem from
> |> the 10baseT card in my PC. While the link light is on, the command
> |> "ifconfig eth0" looks like:
> |>
> |> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:03:04:D0
> |> inet addr:0.0.0.0 Bcast:255.255.255.255 Mask:0.0.0.0
> |> UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MTU:1500 Metric:1
> |> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> |> TX packets:24 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> |> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
> |>
> |> After a set amount of time, the link light will go out, and
> |> the output from ifconfig looks like:
> |>
> |> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:03:04:D0
> |> inet addr:0.0.0.0 P-t-P:0.0.0.0 Mask:0.0.0.0
> |> BROADCAST DEBUG LOOPBACK POINTOPOINT NOTRAILERS NOARP PROMISC
> |> ALLMULTI SLAVE MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> |> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> |> TX packets:19 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> |> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
> |>
> |> I know the card and (a variant of) dhcp works because I can get
> |> on the net with no problems from win95; Linux, though, is causing
> |> me some headaches.
> |>
> |> Any hints on where I should look next?
> --
> John Mellor Kitchener, Ontario, Canada http://www.kitchener.com/mellor/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mellor.kw.net/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============7982F6AAE744022B2E57B448
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="peckrwood.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Peck R. Wood
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="peckrwood.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:R. Wood;Peck R. Wood
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Peck R. Wood R. Wood
end:vcard
==============7982F6AAE744022B2E57B448==
------------------------------
From: "Peck R. Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCP: Socket: Invalid Option
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:00:46 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============60DE996C0E45ABCD54BF3FF8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Austin Gresham wrote:
>
> I recently compiled the dhcpcd client/server package, both version 0.70
>
> (since I'm running the 2.0.36 kernel) and the 1.3.17 version. In the
>
Did you ever get it working? I haven't seen a reply to email I sent the
programmer.
==============60DE996C0E45ABCD54BF3FF8
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="peckrwood.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Peck R. Wood
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="peckrwood.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:R. Wood;Peck R. Wood
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Peck R. Wood R. Wood
end:vcard
==============60DE996C0E45ABCD54BF3FF8==
------------------------------
From: Nicholas Wolverson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Upgrade to 2.2.0 broke PPP dialup
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:01:08 +0100
Hello all.
Recently I upgraded my kernel to 2.2.0, nicely provided on a magazine
coverdisk (PC Plus). I upgraded all the files mentioned in the relavent
file in the Documentation/ directory. So now I have pppd 2.3.5, and its
accompanied PPP code in the kernel.
The trouble is, somewhere along the road, the PPP connection stopped
working. Here's a chunk out of the error log which accompanied the
failure. I haven't snipped, since I know not what's relevant to the
problem - that's the problem.
I hope it's properly formatted - I think I've forced netscape into being
rational...
Mar 15 18:24:55 percy pppd[926]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Mar 15 18:25:20 percy pppd[926]: Serial connection established.
Mar 15 18:25:21 percy pppd[926]: Using interface ppp0
Mar 15 18:25:21 percy pppd[926]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Mar 15 18:25:21 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:24 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:25 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x29 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:25 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x29 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:27 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:27 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2a <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:27 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2a <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:29 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2b <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:29 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2b <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:30 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:31 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2c <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:31 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2c <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:33 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:33 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2d <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:33 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2d <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:35 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2e <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:35 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2e <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:36 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:37 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2f <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:37 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2f <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:39 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:39 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x30 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:39 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x30 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:41 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x31 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:41 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x31 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:42 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:43 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x32 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:43 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x32 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:45 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2d319714> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:45 percy pppd[926]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x33 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:45 percy pppd[926]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x33 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth chap 05> <magic 0x895d9e9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 15 18:25:48 percy pppd[926]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Mar 15 18:25:48 percy pppd[926]: Modem hangup
Mar 15 18:25:48 percy pppd[926]: Connection terminated.
Mar 15 18:25:49 percy pppd[926]: Exit.
Thanks for your time.
--
Nicholas Wolverson
- "Outside! What's it like?"
- "Well -- It's sort of big"
-- (Terry Pratchett, Truckers)
------------------------------
From: Rory Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can't ping Windows 95 from Redhat Linux 5.2
Date: 28 Mar 1999 19:31:57 GMT
Hi,
I am a newbies in Linux world. Recently, I have set up a home network
that only connect a Linux machine to a Windows 95 client. The machine that
have Linux installed can also dual-boot to Windows 95.
When I boot both machines in Windows 95, they can ping each other with
no problem. However, while I boot one in Linux and one in 95, they can't
ping each other. In Windows 95, ping keeps giving messages "request time
out". In Redhat Linux, ping command has no response. Would you know what the
reason is?
I have already checked the TCP/IP settings and they are correct.
Windows 95 box - IP: 192.168.1.2
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Linux box - IP: 192.168.1.1
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
I also have checked the /etc/hosts in Linux and file HOSTS in Windows
directory. They are both identical. I have added LMHOSTS in Windows already.
I have added the route command - 'route add -net 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
eth0" in Linux box.
I have tried to ping the IP on their own and have no problem.
Would you help me to resolve this problem? I have tried many times and the
result is rather frustrating.
Thanks.
Regards,
Rory Chan.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
