Linux-Networking Digest #799, Volume #10 Fri, 9 Apr 99 10:14:34 EDT
Contents:
Re: Using ipchains to block ICQ. (Robbert Muller)
pppd and Prodigy (Alex Turner)
Re: Login to wrong user home directory ("Curt")
Re: Ifconfig and strange results ("Roch Alexandre")
Re: multihomed machine + different services for each address ("Curt")
squid client for win32 ?? (Otavio Exel)
Re: which patch for : Solaris 2.5.1 NFS Server crashed by Linux 2.0.36 unlink() &
inode confusion ("Alain Coetmeur")
Default route through virtual ip? (kernel 2.2.4) (Vesa Vahalummukka)
Re: PPP Problem. Connection to Internet (Eric)
Re: qmail can only send, but not receive (digger)
D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?! (Lee Baxter)
Re: Downloads hanging - please help! (Scott E. Regener)
Exchange server for Linux ("Anders Mattsson")
Re: Downloads hanging - please help! (Scott E. Regener)
Re: Samba as domain login server ("Eric J. Dewey")
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... ("Jan Johansson")
Home Network Help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: MS-LINUX ("Geoff Winkless")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Robbert Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using ipchains to block ICQ.
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 22:34:15 +0200
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
--1501736160-2089089430-923603585=:18793
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Bj�rn Ruberg wrote:
> > Yeah, i figured that out. Just a hassle to list all icq servers.. i have a
> > list of about a hundred or so... Wondered if there was a way to somehow
> > "fingerprint" the ICQ traffic.
mmm I only get 26 server of icq see bottem of the mail < attachment >
>
> ICQ connects to the computers on udp port 4000. If you block all traffic
> into your network on that spesific port you kill all ICQ activity.
in the most icq clients you can set the port by hand ,( done it before on
our school port 53 works perfect ( dns )
--
Robbert Muller
mjrider@writeme dot com | Never let a luser on your console.
uin: 9659330 | Because that means they're in your room.
--1501736160-2089089430-923603585=:18793
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII; NAME="icq.zone"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Description:
Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME="icq.zone"
aWNxLnZvaWQuCVNPQQltanJpZGVyLmVlbmRqZS52b2lkLiBob3N0bWFzdGVy
Lm1qcmlkZXIuZWVuZGplLnZvaWQuICgNCgkJCTE5OTkwMTI4MDEgOyBzZXJp
YWwNCgkJCTI4ODAwIDsgcmVmcmVzaA0KCQkJNzIwMCA7IHJldHJ5DQoJCQk2
MDQ4MDAgOyBleHBpcmUNCgkJCTg2NDAwICkgOyBtaW5pbXVtDQoNCmljcS52
b2lkLglOUwltanJpZGVyLmVlbmRqZS52b2lkLg0KDQppY3Eudm9pZC4JTVgg
NQltanJpZGVyLmVlbmRqZS52b2lkLg0KOw0KaWNxMQkJQQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1
Mi4xDQppY3EyCQlBCTIwNS4xODguMjUyLjINCmljcTMJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4y
NTIuMg0KaWNxNAkJQQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4zDQppY3E1CQlBCTIwNS4xODgu
MjUyLjcNCmljcTYJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4yNTIuMTANCmljcTcJCUEJMjA1LjE4
OC4yNTIuMTENCmljcTgJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4yNTIuMTINCmljcTkJCUEJMjA1
LjE4OC4yNTIuMTQNCmljcTEwCQlBCTIwNS4xODguMjUyLjE1DQppY3ExMQkJ
QQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4xNg0KaWNxMTIJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4yNTIuMTgNCmlj
cTEzCQlBCTIwNS4xODguMjUyLjE5DQppY3ExNAkJQQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4y
MA0KaWNxMTUJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4yNTIuMjINCmljcTE2CQlBCTIwNS4xODgu
MjUyLjIzDQppY3ExNwkJQQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4yNA0KaWNxMTgJCUEJMjA1
LjE4OC4yNTIuMjYNCmljcTE5CQlBCTIwNS4xODguMjUyLjI3DQppY3EyMAkJ
QQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4yOA0KaWNxMjEJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4yNTIuMzANCmlj
cTIyCQlBCTIwNS4xODguMjUyLjMxDQppY3EyMwkJQQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4z
Mg0KaWNxMjQJCUEJMjA1LjE4OC4yNTIuMzQNCmljcTI1CQlBCTIwNS4xODgu
MjUyLjM1DQppY3EyNgkJQQkyMDUuMTg4LjI1Mi4zNg0K
--1501736160-2089089430-923603585=:18793--
------------------------------
From: Alex Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd and Prodigy
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 16:42:28 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have a problem with either my ISP or my pppd config. I am using
default RH5.2 config (i.e. kernel 2.0.36) and the pppd that comes with.
The scripts all seem to work, i.e. I can dialup okay and stuff. After
about 3 hours of intense use, my connection falls over for apparently no
reason. examining /var/log/messages often reveals nothing, but
sometimes has this:
Apr 5 06:06:43 fantasy pppd[1763]: CCP terminated by peer
Apr 5 06:06:43 fantasy pppd[1763]: Compression disabled by peer.
Apr 5 06:06:43 fantasy pppd[1763]: LCP terminated by peer
Apr 5 06:06:46 fantasy pppd[1763]: Modem hangup
Does this mean that my ISP has terminated the connection? Has anyone
else had similar problems with Prodigy Internet? (who btw will often
tell you if you dial Support that it is impossible to connect to their
service using any UNIX).
Musicmaker
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Login to wrong user home directory
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 06:00:49 -0500
Take a look in /etc/passwd. You can fix the home directory there with an
editor.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7ekj2j$5v1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm using Redhat 5.2a.
>The problem is that when my server user is login to server, he meet the
>message that "Can't find homedirectory, so login to root".
>
>For example, when server user "bok"(home directory: /usr1/bok) login to
server
>with his full ID & Passwd
>meet the message that Can't find user home directory "/usr1/bok!".
>In this case why the "!" was attached at directory name?
>
>Any solution?
>
>
>=============================================================
>Yeon Bok, Cho
>HomePage: http://cybok.donga.ac.kr
>E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>ICQ # : 22200578
>TEL +8251 200 6473 FAX +8251 200 6991
>=============================================================
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Roch Alexandre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ifconfig and strange results
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 12:36:03 +0200
Thank you, you are right.
+linuxtst1:/usr/local/apache/conf# ifconfig -V
net-tools 1.432
ifconfig 1.29 (1997-09-23)
linuxtst1:/usr/local/apache/conf# netstat -i
Kernel Interface table
Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR
Flags
lo 3924 0 301 0 0 0 0 9657 301 0 LRU
tr0 2000 0 229483 0 0 0 0 765790 7218 0 BRU
Roch
> Don't tell me -- let me guess that you upgraded to the 2.2.x kernels
>and didn't change your net-tools to match? :-)
>
> I forget the exact version number, but that's the package you need
>to update. It may be available pre-compiled, or you may have to build
>it. It's quite easy, actually.
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: multihomed machine + different services for each address
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 06:12:11 -0500
I don't think most daemons support this. 2 exceptions that I know of are
socks and named,
they will only respond on specified IPs. You probably could inspect the
code on these daemons
and modify the others you with to run to operate the same.
I'd probably just setup different systems if I were you, but I'm not.
Eric Trimmer wrote in message ...
>
>I have a host on the Internet with 1 static IP. I plan on offering web
>space/services for a few local companys/organizations. I also plan on
>getting more static IP's for each.
>
> ie. "my.original.org" has address 000.000.000.000.
> "www.company1.com" will have address 111.111.111.111
> "www.company2.com" will have address 222.222.222.222
>
>
>All address's will actually be the same machine.
>
>I understand how to setup Apache to serve several different
webpages/domains.
>But what should I be reading about to prevent other services; such as
>telnet, anonymous FTP, ping ....; being offered for "www.company1.com" and
>"www.company2.com" yet still offer these services for "my.original.org" ?
>
>Is this a function of the basic Linux configuration files such as
>/etc/services, /etc/inetd.conf, /etc/hosts.allow..... or separate firewall
>software ?
>
>Thanks,
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Eric Trimmer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otavio Exel)
Subject: squid client for win32 ??
Date: 9 Apr 1999 11:42:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hello all,
is there a port of the squiclient (squid companion program) for Win32?
note that I do not want to run squid on a Win box (it is allready
happily running on Linux); I just want to be able to fetch data from
squid's cache from inside a .BAT file;
thanks,
--
Otavio Exel /<\oo/>\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Alain Coetmeur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: which patch for : Solaris 2.5.1 NFS Server crashed by Linux 2.0.36
unlink() & inode confusion
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 12:27:27 +0200
Francis Sung a �crit dans le message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Alain Coetmeur wrote:
>>
>> On our network, our new Linux 2.0 (suse 6 & Redhat 5.2)
>> have trigered a well known bug about the Solaris 2.5.1 NFS Server.
>> the problem happens when a program make an unlink()
>I've see similar problems on Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 7 sparc machines
>too.
>Switching linux to 2.2 kernel did not fix it. Are there any patches?
this seems more serious than what I've heard about.
however with kernel 2.2 I've heard about other problems with the new "lockd"
locak daemon, that is moreover absent in kernel 2.0.
this apears when linux is nfs server.
but for linux nfs client I've heard that patches, solaris 2.6 or kernel 2.2 do help...
I'm a little frightened now...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vesa Vahalummukka)
Subject: Default route through virtual ip? (kernel 2.2.4)
Date: 9 Apr 1999 11:54:36 GMT
After updating from 2.0.36 to 2.2.4 we are no more able to configure
default route through virtual (alias) ip.
The significant part of the configuration:
route add -net x.y.z.128 netmask 255.255.255.192 eth0:0
route add default dw x.y.z.129
When I type route -n in 2.0.36 after the above commands
the interface for default route is eth0:0. In 2.2.4
the primary interface is used (eth0) instead.
Any ideas what might be wrong with our configuration?
Best regards
--Lummukka
------------------------------
From: Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Problem. Connection to Internet
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 14:21:00 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> My problem is : I am using Red Hat 5.2, PPP. I get: dialing the modem,
> dialing to my ISP, and connecting but,,, no activity. In /var/log/messages I
> get after getting conection..... Serial connection established. Using
> interface ppp0 Mar 31 02:29:13 mihost pppd[371]: Connect: ppp0 <-->
> /dev/modem Mar 31 02:30:43 mihost pppd[371]: LCP: timeout sending
> Config-Requests ????? Mar 31 02:30:43 mihost pppd[371]: Connection
> terminated. Mar 31 02:30:44 mihost pppd[371]: Exit.
>
> Any idea?
Yes!
In my newbie days (last week, actually) I encountered the same problem.
Your ISP doesn't understand that you want a PPP-connection. If you make
the same connection using minicom you'll probable see a wellcoming text
after you login.
In my case the solution was preceding my username with a P.
Go back to LinuxConf and change your username to e.g. Prcga.
I found this solution somewere in Dejanews, not unknown to you, me
thinks... Look there for more options, if your problem persists.
Success!
Eric
------------------------------
From: digger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: qmail can only send, but not receive
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 04:01:46 -0500
thank you.
Curt wrote:
> Did you add this to /etc/inetd.conf?
>
> smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/sbin/tcpd
> /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
>
i add one similar line to inetd.conf as suggested by the file INSTALL,
smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
is the tcp-env the same function as tcpd?
>
> Make sure the /var/qmail/control files are correct?
>
> If you type:
>
> $ ps ax | grep qmail
>
> do you get something like?
>
> 341 ? S 0:00 qmail-lspawn | dot-forward .forward\012./Mailbox
> 17994 p0 S 0:00 grep qmail
> 340 ? S 0:00 splogger qmail
> 343 ? S 0:00 qmail-clean
> 342 ? S 0:00 qmail-rspawn
> 338 ? S 0:00 qmail-send
>
here is the output $ ps ax | grep qmail
326 ? S 0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail qmail-start # Using procmail
to de
342 ? S 0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-smtpd tcpserver -v -c40 -x
/etc/tc
347 ? S 0:00 qmail-lspawn # Using procmail to deliver messages to
/var/sp
363 ? S 0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-qmqpd tcpserver -v -c40 -u81
-g80
4158 ? S 0:00 supervise /var/lock/qmail-smtpd tcpserver -v -c40 -x
/etc/tc
366 ? S 0:00 tcpserver -v -c40 -u81 -g80 0 628 qmail-qmqpd
327 ? S 0:00 cyclog -s 1000000 /var/log/qmail
344 ? S 0:00 cyclog -s 1000000 /var/log/qmail-smtpd
346 ? S 0:00 accustamp qmail
365 ? S 0:00 cyclog -s 1000000 /var/log/qmail-qmqpd
349 ? S 0:00 qmail-clean
348 ? S 0:00 qmail-rspawn
328 ? S 0:00 qmail-send
4157 p7 S 0:00 grep qmail
no splogger in my case. what does it do?
>
> Did you make sure it would allow for local relays?
> in /etc/hosts.allow soemthing like:
>
> tcp-env: 206.208.xx., 206.208.xx. : setenv=RELAYCLIENT
>
my /etc/hosts.allow actually an empty file. in my case
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts control which hosts I can send emails to.
ok, any furthure advices?
>
> digger wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I just installed qmail for curiosity. when i test it, it can send email
> >from my local machine to my school account, but it can not receive
> >emails neither from local machine or my school account. sendmail could
> >do both before i uninstalled it. any clue? Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Baxter)
Subject: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?!
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 12:40:16 GMT
I've been trying to set up a D-Link DFE 530TX 10/100 NIC.
It's a PCI card, and is jumperless. There also isn't a software
package to set the IRQ and IO. PnP PCI.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Lee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Scott E. Regener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Downloads hanging - please help!
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:53:53 -0400
On Thu, 08 Apr 1999, Peter MacKay wrote:
>Are you able to download anything larger than 100 Meg from anywhere else?
I haven't tried downloading anything in the 100MB range. Most of the files
that hang are anywhere bewteen 120K and 5MB. Files that are larger have been
downloaded without problems.
>Also what app are you using to download?
I've tried Netscape, ncftp, ftp, and kfm. All fail, but only on some files
(and the files that fail fail for all the applications named.)
>Are you behind a firewall ?
Nope. PPP connection straight to the ISP.
--
Scott E. Regener
DSS Since 7/95
DVD Since 6/98
------------------------------
From: "Anders Mattsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Exchange server for Linux
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 14:28:34 +0200
I would like to set up an Exchange server for our NT4 network (25
Workstations) and wonder if I can do it with a Linux application instead of
MS Excange server. Any suggestion will be highly appreciated.
Anders M.
------------------------------
From: Scott E. Regener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Downloads hanging - please help!
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:58:54 -0400
On Thu, 08 Apr 1999, Ron Watkins wrote:
>Right now the problem could be in a number of places, so you'll have to do
>some detective work. Some questions I'm having in looking at this:
>
> 1. Does it fail with all clients? Try ftp, ncftp, netscape. Does it
>always
>hang in the same place on all three clients?
All clients fail, all at the same place. I suspect PPP is the problem, but
have no clue where to find a newer one than the one that came with RH5.2
>2. Does it fail when you are running as root? How about as a user?
Yes as root. Yes as user.
>3. Does it fail with the older Linux kernels? Try 2.0.36
This I haven't tried yet.
>4. Can you try it with a different modem?
Unfortunately, no. I only have one PCMCIA modem to use.
>5. If you run it without sound and X (console mode only, as many
> programs
shut down as possible) does it still fail in the same place?
I'm not sure. I use KPPP to connect, and I used EZPPP before that, and I
wouldn't even know where to start to configure PPP (other than the cryptic
HOWTO which I couldn't make heads or tails of.) I'm a newbie, so I'm trying
to avoid doing things the hard way if I can. It failed before I got sound
working.
> 6. Can you try from another phone line, preferably across town? (reaching a
>bit
>here :)
Done. No difference. 30 miles far enough from the original spot? :-)
> 7. Can you download the same file under Windows? (preferably on the same
>machine if poss.)
Definitely. They all download without problems via Windows. If I installed
FAT32 support in my kernel, I suppose I could download them there and then
read them from Linux, but again, I'm trying to avoid doing things the hard
way. I *should* be able to download these files from Linux, thus I
*shouldn't* have to reboot into a despised OS to do so.
--
Scott E. Regener
DSS Since 7/95
DVD Since 6/98
------------------------------
From: "Eric J. Dewey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba as domain login server
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:11:30 -0400
To avoid a restart when changing LMHOSTS, execute 'nbtstat -R' :)
Eric J. Dewey
Brad Weaver <[email protected]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I had a similar problem that stumped me along
>too and then it hit me...check your LMHOSTS
>file in the Windows directory and make sure
>that either there is NO entry for the Linux
>machine or if there is an entry that its IP
>address is correct. I had an incorrect entry
>on one machine from a time when my Linux box
>had been assigned a different IP address. Once
>I removed the entry AND RESTARTED (very important)
>the machine, viola! I could log in just fine.
>Hope this helps....
>
>
>Brad Weaver - ComputerAid - http://www.compuaid.com -
>$$bweaver@$$compuaid.com
>"A great simulator still can't beat even poor reality" Remove the $$
>from my address to send email (Spam Avoider)
>
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 14:58:27 +0200
Uhm, no. The MS Net client sits ontop of the networking components, the
mouse does NOT sit above the sound components.
>That's my point, though I didn't phrase it properly... What does that
>network program have to do with dialup passwords? Nothing!
>
>An analogy for this situation would be that you have to install a
>mouse driver in order to use your sound card! The two have nothing in
>common...
>--
>
>Jon-o Addleman
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Home Network Help
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:53:54 GMT
I'm trying to setup a home net with a RH 5.2 server and 3 win98 PCs. The
server will be a web/mail/news proxy and file/print server. My ISDN TA
(Adtran XRT) is hooked up to the server, connecting to Bellsouth.net (single,
64K channel). I've read the HOWTOs, etc., but cannot get most anything to
work, and I don't have alot of time to figure it out - working long hours :).
Does someone have this configuration, and if so, can you send me the settings
for DNS, PPP scripts, Samba, etc.?
Specifically: 1. I can't get caching DNS working correctly (I'm using
192.168.1.2 for server, 192.168.1.3-5 for win98). I can ping/telnet the
machines on the local net, but I can't get to anything outside when
connecting to Bellsouth. I think I've got win98 setup correctly. (Please
note: I'm running TCP/IP and NETBEUI on win98; I need NETBEUI to network a
scanner from one win98 machine to another). 2. How do I get the dialup screen
on Win98 to turn off when telnet'ing into Linux (some netbios problem or
setting?)? 3. I've got ppp dialup working on Linux with the Adtran TA, but
again, I can't ping anything beyond the ISP's server, even using IP address
instead of name. 4. I can't get Samba configured to mount win98 disks (win98
has sharing on for all disks). Is there a way to do this automatically? Note:
Samba is working to the point where I can see the win98 PCs, running
smbclient -L <host>.
Any help is appreciated...
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Geoff Winkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: MS-LINUX
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 13:49:49 +0100
TURBO1010 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ebcph$lkn$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Thanks
> Jared Johnson wrote in message <7ebceq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >My hat's off to the writer ... I'm a little late reading due to a short
> >vacation but he had me convinced. Thanks for the good laugh and THANK
GOD
> >it isn't true!
Not particularly original though. Computer Weekly had the same Winux story
in this week's (April 1) edition.
Geoff
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
