Linux-Networking Digest #800, Volume #10          Fri, 9 Apr 99 13:13:26 EDT

Contents:
  PPP-lease help.. (not totally newbie..:) ("pts")
  Re: Sound Blaster 128 (Jason McKnight)
  Re: ICQ for LAN? (Joseph Santaniello)
  Re: Damn W98 and Samba! ("Monty Ebner")
  Re: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?! (Victor Collins)
  Re: Telnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  IP Masquerading Help Required (Gary Collis)
  Re: Netatalk Printer (Joseph Santaniello)
  Re: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?! ("Daniel G. Hyams")
  Re: Downloads hanging - please help! (Stephen Cornell)
  Networking ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Getting my LAN onto the NET! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Home Network Help (RE) ("pv")
  Re: Pcmcia 3Com Megahertz (Filip Schepers)
  Re: Downloads hanging - please help! ("Scott E. Regener")
  Re: Help with setting up internet connection (Tim Koruna)
  Re: server assigned dns? ("Reuben Farrelly")
  dial into linux box (SuSE 6.0) via Windows client? (baja)
  Re: Minicom is sloooooooowwww (jason)
  Re: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?! (Lee Baxter)
  Re: IP-masq and diald urgent question! (Jon-o Addleman)
  Re: PPP available for non-root user ("William R. Mattil")
  Re: which patch for : Solaris 2.5.1 NFS Server crashed by Linux 2.0.36  (Francis 
Sung)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "pts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: PPP-lease help.. (not totally newbie..:)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 15:50:32 +0200

Hello, I've installed (SuSE) Linux now, and it kicks butt! I am though
having a problem setting up my network, so I need help from Linux experts..

I've set up eth0, and I'm able to send/receive packets on eth0.
ppp0 is set up; it dials out and gets listed in /proc/net/dev. I can
"tcpdump" from it.

Though when, for instance, trying "ping 128.214.1.1" (ftp.funet.fi), I get
"Network is unreachable". Same with telnet and ftp. What's my problem? I'm
sure it's got a simple solution!

Am I supposed to direct ping/ftp/telnet/www to ppp0 or something?

Many thanks in advance,
-[pts]



------------------------------

From: Jason McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sound Blaster 128
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 10:01:21 -0400

hehehe, maybe he is creating a sonic network :)

Erik Hensema wrote:

> El Hombre ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >How do I get my SB128 to work under Linux.
>
> Even if you get it to work, networking isn't possible.
>
> --
> Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


------------------------------

From: Joseph Santaniello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ICQ for LAN?
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 16:35:40 +0200

Hi,

ICQ is probably the best bet. You can set up your own server, I recall
seeing something about on their page. But what's wrong with Talk? There
are nice Mac and Windows talk clients around, with windows, menus, the
whole bit. No need for a terminal.

Joe

Tim Holmes wrote:
> 
> I am interested in implementing an ICQ or AOL instant
> messenger type of thing on a LAN.  Has anyone done this
> type of thing?  Or should this be obvious?
> 
> It would need to run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.  Unix
> "talk" on a terminal emulation really isn't an option.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tim Holmes

------------------------------

From: "Monty Ebner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Damn W98 and Samba!
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:33:30 +0200


Mark F. Burgo ( Systems Administrator ) schrieb in Nachricht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Ingmar Meins wrote:
>>
>> First please excuse me if this has recently been covered BUT...
>>
>> I have a Redhat 5.2 / 2.2.3 box running Samba. Works very nicely talking
>> to our W95 machines, no need to manually enter passwords to access
>> shares etc. When I try to talk to the thing from W98 I get a "Please
>> enter password" prompt as soon as I double click the Samba box icon in
>> "Network Neighbourhood". Then it tells me the password is incorrect - no
>> matter what I enter.
>>
>> I presume it's something really basic.. If I don't fix it soon I'll
>> bring my nice shiny Glock home and "fix" windows 98 properly !
>>
>> Any guides would be appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ingmar
>>
>> P.S. Our network is home based. P100 (mine - W98), 2 x DX4/100 (kids -
>> W95), 1 x dx4/100 linux box.
>

you must enter a new key in the win98 registry to disable the encrypted
passwords:

hkey_local_mashine/system/services/vxd/vnetsub
new key: EnablePlainTextPassword
value: "1"

good luck




------------------------------

From: Victor Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?!
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:27:14 GMT

try via_rhine driver

Lee Baxter wrote:

> I've been trying to set up a D-Link DFE 530TX 10/100 NIC.
> It's a PCI card, and is jumperless.  There also isn't a software
> package to set the IRQ and IO.  PnP PCI.
>
> Any suggestions?
> Thanks,
>         Lee
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Telnet
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:22:31 GMT

In article <XhQJ2.13014$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  "Matt Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way (i.e. which command to use) to edit my system files after I
> telnet into linux from my windows box and su to root? Thanks
>
> Matt Anderson
>
> Use vi. Yeah, some may say use Pico, and Pico is easier to use initially, but

learning vi is probably worth it since it is virtually guaranteed to be
present on any Unix system.

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: Gary Collis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerading Help Required
Date: 9 Apr 1999 13:32:13 GMT

Hello

I am using IP masquerading to enable my department (3 Win98 PC's) to 
connect to a single ISP account. The gateway is running RedHat 5.1 and 
uses an IP router to establish the ISDN connection to the ISP. 

All is working well, in fact I am using it right now, apart from the fact 
that outgoing connections are being made for no apparent reason. I believe 
it is some setting on the clients as the connect time does not increase 
over night whilst these are turned off. The clients are running TCP/IP and 
the IPX/SPX (for our Novell server) protocols and have been set to use 
Linux as the gateway and the Proxy server.

Does anyone have any ideas as to how I can remove these unwanted outgoing 
calls?


==================  Posted via SearchLinux  ==================
                  http://www.searchlinux.com

------------------------------

From: Joseph Santaniello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netatalk Printer
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 16:42:26 +0200

Hi,

I don't recall if there was anything here but check:

http://thehamptons.com/anders/netatalk/

Joe

Michael Moore wrote:
> 
> I'm new to Linux.  I'm more than willing to read howtos,
> but I'm having trouble finding the answers for this particular
> problem
> 
> How do I make it possible for the Windows Machines
> on my Network to access an Appletalk printer through
> a Linux machine?  I have installed Samba, I have installed
> Netatalk, what now?
>                                            thanks in advance,
>                                                    Michael Moore
>                                                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------

From: "Daniel G. Hyams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?!
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:29:40 -0500

On Fri, 9 Apr 1999, Lee Baxter wrote:

> I've been trying to set up a D-Link DFE 530TX 10/100 NIC.
> It's a PCI card, and is jumperless.  There also isn't a software
> package to set the IRQ and IO.  PnP PCI.
> 

The via-rhine driver is the one to use; I didn't have to 
set any IRQs for the card (it looked like the IRQ was assigned
by the PnP BIOS in the initial startup).  After installing the
driver, watch your initial linux startup text to make sure that
something with "eth0" and "via-rhine" pops up.

===========================================================
Daniel G. Hyams
email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:  (601) 323-4198  
===========================================================


------------------------------

From: Stephen Cornell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Downloads hanging - please help!
Date: 09 Apr 1999 14:55:17 +0000

Scott E. Regener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> some files will not download, no matter what method I try to
> download them.  Other files, often from the same site, download without any
> problems at all.  

I have a very similar problem, using a PCMCIA V90 modem on my laptop
(Red Hat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36).  The problem seems only to affect RPM
files, though - if I download the RPM file on another machine, and
gzip it (which hardly changed the size at all, of course), I can then
retrieve it via ftp over my modem.  Have you tried downloading
similarly-sized .gz files?

The modem seems to be at fault, since I had no problems when I tried a
different one.  I wonder if the problem is due to buggy compression
software that is somehow confused by a pattern of data in RPM files.
What is the make of your modem?

I've posted a message on comp.os.linux.misc and uk.comp.os.linux, but
unfortunately noone has replied yet.
--
Stephen Cornell          [EMAIL PROTECTED]         Tel/fax +44-1223-336644
University of Cambridge, Zoology Department, Downing Street, CAMBRIDGE CB2 3EJ


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Networking
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 14:48:36 GMT

Anybody could help me to find a good software to manage my ip network ?
My aim is to be able to create an automated graphic representation of all my
devices hub, router, ...

Does netviz do it ?   netviz.com

Sincerely

Dyvim.

PS: Is there a microsoft application which can enable the visualisation of LAN
network ?

Pass your mcp exam : mcpblanc.com mcpquizz.com Visio entreprise is really
good for automatic application ( ping, traceroute ??)

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Getting my LAN onto the NET!
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 14:09:09 GMT

Hello!

I wonder if anyone of you can help me out here :

Me and 2 other mates have connected our PC's onto a LAN. Windows 98, then, we
got an offer: A CABLE MODEM! (thats right guys) :-)

Anyways, I wonder if some of you have done this before, and know what I am
talking about!

the thing is:

I need to know:

WHAT i need to set things up using LINUX, to get connected to the Internet!
All 3 of us!

I need a lot of help here, that is...Detailed help :)

Sorry that I haven't got the time to write anymore, but I have to go to my
gymnastic-Practice!!

Cu l8r, and hope that you can give me DETAILED answers conserning this
situasjon!


============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: "pv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Home Network Help (RE)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:21:14 +0200

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7el0pg$gph$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm trying to setup a home net with a RH 5.2 server and 3 win98 PCs. The
[SNIP]

first u need to compile ipmasq and forwading firewalling into the kernel.
then I would like to see your netstat - i reply

here's mine:

[root@xxx /root]# netstat -i
Kernel Interface table
Iface     MTU Met  RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR  TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR
Flags
lo       3584   0   1902      0      0      0   1902      0      0      0
BLRU
eth0     1500   0 730902      0      0      0  42213      0      0      0
BMRU
eth1     1500   0  55747      0      0      0  54217      0      0      0
BRU

ok eth0 is my internet access, eth1 is my internal network (192.168.1.1)

I do this for my ipmasq'ing (remember kernel support still) put it in rc.d:

/sbin/route add -net 192.168.1.0 eth1   ## add the network address to
intranet ##
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny  ## hide the local machines IP number from ISP ##
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 ## add forwarding rules
##
depmod -a ## create dependencies for all modules ##
modprobe /lib/modules/2.0.35/ipv4/ip_masq_irc.o ## if u wanna chat ##
modprobe /lib/modules/2.0.35/ipv4/ip_masq_ftp.o ## ftp ##
modprobe /lib/modules/2.0.35/ipv4/ip_masq_quake.o ## etc. ##
modprobe /lib/modules/2.0.35/ipv4/ip_masq_vdolive.o
modprobe /lib/modules/2.0.35/ipv4/ip_masq_cuseeme.o
modprobe /lib/modules/2.0.35/ipv4/ip_masq_raudio.o

## note these are comments and must be left out of the start script!!! ##

ip_masq_icq.o is also available and more probably its all I need up there

Converting ipfwadm to ipchains (kernel 2.2.x) is easy, same commands
as with ipfawdm... no prob!

ALL: take good time to read the docs/howtos on www.ipmasq.cjb.net

## remember that kernel compile with ipmasq support and firewalling ##

good luck
pv

PS: I hope this posting of a clean working ipmasq gate for
an intranet will help others with similar problems







------------------------------

From: Filip Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pcmcia 3Com Megahertz
Date: 9 Apr 1999 15:58:26 GMT

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============300AF8ACA050DE9A7F4F1AAB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The 3c574 driver is buggy - it's a problem that also affects people
using the 3com CCFEM556B card (10/100/56k). Some people reported success
by installing the latest 3.0.9 PCMCIA package, depending on the laptop
their using.
What laptop are you guys using? Ours are Toshiba Tecra (510 & 8000) -
don't work...


Bernie Ott wrote:
> 
> NGO Kaluong wrote:
> 
> > I use a Linux Kernel 2.0.36. The system dectect my pcmcia card but i cannot
> > use the network function with !
> > Can someone help me !!!!!!
> 
> I just purchased a 3Com Megahertz 3c574B 10/100 card.
> I got it working, but upon reboot it started giving me problems.
> If you get any information about this card, please pass it along to me.
> 
> Thanks.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
================================================================================
Filip Schepers 
================================================================================
==============300AF8ACA050DE9A7F4F1AAB
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="fschepers.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Filip Schepers
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="fschepers.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Schepers;Filip
tel;fax:+32-2-479 75 18
tel;work:+32-2-479 67 97
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.iss.net
org:Internet Security Systems NV
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://ace.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~tmf
title:Security Consultant
adr;quoted-printable:;;Buro & Design Center=0D=0AHeysel 
Esplanade=0D=0A;Brussels;;B-1020;Belgium
note;quoted-printable:Personal website at =0D=0A=
fn:Filip
end:vcard

==============300AF8ACA050DE9A7F4F1AAB==


------------------------------

From: "Scott E. Regener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Downloads hanging - please help!
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 10:20:54 -0400

Stephen Cornell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a very similar problem, using a PCMCIA V90 modem on my laptop
> (Red Hat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36).  The problem seems only to affect RPM
> files, though - if I download the RPM file on another machine, and
> gzip it (which hardly changed the size at all, of course), I can then
> retrieve it via ftp over my modem.  Have you tried downloading
> similarly-sized .gz files?

Size seems not to be the issue.  I've even experienced the problem on
binaries (not compressed at all.)  The same files download fine via Win98
with the same modem, so I suspect the modem is not the problem.

> The modem seems to be at fault, since I had no problems when I tried a
> different one.  I wonder if the problem is due to buggy compression
> software that is somehow confused by a pattern of data in RPM files.
> What is the make of your modem?

I have an ActionTec modem.

Was your other modem a V.90 as well?

Scott E. Regener



------------------------------

From: Tim Koruna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with setting up internet connection
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 11:38:23 -0500

>       I have two pc, one running windows 98 and other running Red Hat Linux
> 5.2  Both are connected through ethernet card and a hub. What I would like
> to do is dial in to my ISP using the windows machine but also be able to
> access the internet through the ethernet connection to the windows box.  I
> would appreciate if someone could give me a few pointers to how can I
> achieve this.

Try http://tcu-inc.com/mark/articles/Home.html for some helpful
instructions and pointers to useful resources.

I don't think you'd be best served by using the Win98 box as your
gateway.  You'd be better off IMHO by using your Linux box to establish
an Internet connection, and point your Win98 box to it as its Internet
gateway.  In this way you can, at minimum, set up TCP wrappers on your
Linux box to provide a modicum of security while on the Internet.  With
the Win98 box as your gateway, you're throwing the doors wide open.

I can give you more specifics if you need 'em, but this should get you
started.

TK.


------------------------------

From: "Reuben Farrelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: server assigned dns?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 01:47:39 +1000

Hi,

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> simple, install DNS on the local machine and forget about your isp's
> make sure that some root servers are referenced in named.boot

That is, if you have the time and want to go to the trouble, and also
assumes that you have the CPU/memory resources to run your own DNS.  Most
home/non-technical users don't, and BIND is a fairly memory intensive
daemon.
There's really little point in running your own DNS unless you are hosting a
domain with it anyway.  If you want to run your own DNS, set your providers
DNS as a forwarder so that your DNS forwards requests to your ISPs if it
does not know the answer.

> *OR*
> after connecting do a
> whois (your isp's domain name) | grep NS | cut -b19-35
> this should give you the dns numbers of your isp
> put these numbers in /etc/resolv.conf
> need only do this once every time you change your isp.

"Should" is not a good enough reason.  Why not?  Try doing that as above
with my provider, domain: mira.net or another:   werple.net.au
The nameservers that customers are to use are not those listed in the whois
database as authoritative for our domain.  Server assigned gives us
203.9.190.17 and 203.9.190.18 - and that's not how it's listed in the whois
database.  This approach may/should work, but may not be quite correct
either.  Check with your ISP what their DNS numbers are.

> -or-
> once you have a dns entry for ANY domain, they are globaly valid
> regardless of what isp you connect to.

No.  DNS records are designed to be able to be changed by administrators who
run the primary DNS for a domain without the end user being affected.  If
you add static/manual entries, you break that dynamic feature of DNS.  While
the DNS entry may be true when you enter it, if the DNS administrator
changes the DNS record for that domain, you're left with the wrong DNS
details.  That's partly why DNS records have serial numbers which are
incremented on DNS changes.

Until very recently, it hasn't been possible to use server assigned DNS with
Linux.  It has been a limitation of the pppd package, but this has been
implemented in 2.3.6 onwards.
In 2.3.6 onwards it's pretty straightforward to use - read the documentation
that comes with this package for more info (it's fairly readable).  Clue:
the DNS numbers now appear in your messages log :)


Reuben




------------------------------

From: baja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dial into linux box (SuSE 6.0) via Windows client?
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 23:34:06 +0700

Can someone point me to a documentation about setting up dial-in server using
SuSE Linux 6.0. So I can make a connection into my Linux-box (a USR 56K modem 
attached to it)

I already read J.Gentry doc. But couldn't make it. 
regds.,
baja

------------------------------

From: jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,apana.lists.os.linux.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Minicom is sloooooooowwww
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 12:48:54 -0400


Is there an IRQ conflict on your modem device?

-jason

Mojoman wrote:
> 
> Ok, my minicom is sooo slow. I type in a command it takes a few seconds to
> respond. It is so slow connecting to my server that I time out before I can
> type in my username and password. Any idea what is going on? Thanks.
> Mark

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Baxter)
Subject: Re: D-Link DFE 530TX driver/setup?!
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 14:35:37 GMT

I tried.  I was probably doing it wrong.
Got a command-line handy?

Thanks,
        Lee

On Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:27:14 GMT, Victor Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>try via_rhine driver
>
>Lee Baxter wrote:
>
>> I've been trying to set up a D-Link DFE 530TX 10/100 NIC.
>> It's a PCI card, and is jumperless.  There also isn't a software
>> package to set the IRQ and IO.  PnP PCI.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>> Thanks,
>>         Lee
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon-o Addleman)
Subject: Re: IP-masq and diald urgent question!
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 13:45:58 GMT

Once upon a  9 Apr 1999 09:15:46 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike
Jagdis) wrote:

>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Janusz wrote:
>>I have a small network and Linux RH5.2 (everything installed) connecting
>>to my ISP with dynamic IP. I use IP-masq and diald to automatically
>>bring up a connection.
>>The problem is: when i start Netscape on a computer inside my network
>>and try to load some www page, first everything seems to work ok,  diald
>>connects to my ISP but then Netscape says "There was no response..." and
>>I have to press "reload" to connect to this www page. It seems to me,
>>that I've reviewed all the FAQ and this list also. The solution I found
>>there is to put in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local something like echo 1 >
>>/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr but this doesn't work!
>>
>>So maybe someone knows any other solution???
>
>Get a newer diald from http://diald.unix.ch. Read the README.masq
>that comes with it. Set up the masquerading in an addroute script
>and tear it down in the delroute script, allow forwarding unmasqueraded
>on the proxy. The problem you have is that masquerading before you
>actually know what IP to masquerade as is impossible :-).

Ah... you mean just have it send the packets as if they were coming
from the real IPs (192.168.1.x in this case) in order to get diald
working, and then start the masquerading after? And that works? Neato!
I'll try it.
-- 

Jon-o Addleman

------------------------------

From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP available for non-root user
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1999 21:56:17 -0500

Bill Unruh wrote:

> ]I also had to SUID the "chat" executable.  On my machine,
>
> chat should NOT have to be suid. chat is run by pppd after pppd has
> switched to root, and thus is run by root from pppd.
> (Certainly my chat is NOT suid)

While I agree with this in principle, it is not a very workable
solution. For example, your chat script should not contain the user
id/password combination because then any user executing "ps ax" at the
right moment would have your id/passwd combination revealed. A far more
secure solution is to have  the chat script open a file (read-only by
root) containing this information. If this is the case, then chat will
have to be suid to read this file. Which opens up other security
concerns ...... I think that the best solution to this is to write a
wrapper in c that exec's the start-up script. Then set this wrapper suid
root. This is the same principle used to allow a non-root user to drop
the ppp session.

However ...... the most secure way is to allow only root to do any of
this :^)


Regards
Bill


--
William R. Mattil       | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106          | and... in high heels.




------------------------------

From: Francis Sung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: which patch for : Solaris 2.5.1 NFS Server crashed by Linux 2.0.36 
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 10:01:33 -0400

Alain Coetmeur wrote:
> this seems more serious than what I've heard about.
> 
> however with kernel 2.2 I've heard about other problems with the new "lockd"
> locak daemon, that is moreover absent in kernel 2.0.
> this apears when linux is nfs server.
> 
> but for linux nfs client I've heard that patches, solaris 2.6 or kernel 2.2 do 
>help...
> I'm a little frightened now...

We have linux kernel 2.0.x running as nfs server and a bunch of solaris
2.5.1, 2.6 and 7 as nfs clients.  I was hoping either it was because
linux 2.0.x has nfs version 2 and/or no lockd that a file newly created
immediately after a directory removal was confused by the nfs client to
be a directory.  This happened quite often when I do a complex make or
sometimes even when I checked in files under CVS (or RCS)!  And it won't
fix itself even after the normal automount timeout.  It eventually will
after a very long timeout or reboot.  But when we used another machine
with the 2.2.x kernel with kernel nfs (version 3, I think) and lockd,
the same thing happened.  Did anyone out there experienced this before? 
Anyone care to comment on what's wrong here?
-- 
========================================================================
Francis Sung                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DOME imaging systems, inc.                    Voice: (781) 895-1183 x147
400 Fifth Ave., Waltham, MA 02451             Fax:   (781) 895-1133

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to