Linux-Networking Digest #813, Volume #10 Sat, 10 Apr 99 17:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: Noticing a pattern: Red Hat + ethernet + 3c509 family = net (Dave Fanjoy)
IP Masq + Windows Networking Angst ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Help Please: Linux 2.2.5 and BT Speedway ISDN (honestly new question) (Paul
Black)
Re: 286 diskless computers like terminals on linux (Ralph Zeller)
Re: PPP connections problem with RedHat 5.2 ("James Holbrook")
Re: different telnet and ftp ("JAGADISH KUMARAN(97D07013)")
Re: TCP Port Reservation ("JAGADISH KUMARAN(97D07013)")
Re: What does this entry in /var/log/maillog mean???? (Frank Sweetser)
Re: What does this entry in /var/log/maillog mean???? (mist)
Re: RT8029 Network Card. PLEASE HELP (Jamie)
Re: Port Forwarding (Daniel Charlebois)
PPP help? (Michael Chang)
Re: PPP and chat script problem (Michael Chang)
Re: PPP setup (Jamie)
pppd server (Alan T)
linux+mac+pc network running Netware 3.22 ("Kevin L Larsen")
samba help ? ("Kevin Bates")
Writers wanted for zine articles. (Port Lord)
Re: Passwords readable in file passwd (Josh Gentry)
Re: Sendmail, what use (John Thompson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dave Fanjoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Noticing a pattern: Red Hat + ethernet + 3c509 family = net
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:52:01 -0500
> Nonya Bidness wrote:
>
>> the net. I have the 3c509 card family and can't reach the nameservers.
>> unreachable?? what is the deal? I am headed to check Red Hat's page
Chris MacKenzie wrote:
>
> I have a 3c590B-TX (Cyclone) and mine works just fine (see log below).
Note that the 3c509b and the 3c590b and the 3c905b are all
completely different cards that use different drivers. I'm not sure why
3com decided to use this naming convention, but it's pretty unfortunate.
So the problem still stands: what happens with the 3c509b that
makes the network unreachable? Seems like a lot of us are having this
problem, even after screwing around with the i/o, irq, and pnp settings
on the etherdisk. In ifconfig, route, and netstat it looks like my NIC is
working, and I can ping myself. But all other attempts to access the
network fail. When I reported this to RedHat technical support, they said
they thought it meant my network was set up wrong.
However, all the network numbers are right, and if i use a
different box with a different card at the same 10baseT line, it works
fine. So somehow, the 3c509b and my box aren't working together right.
Any suggestions?
Dave
=================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP Masq + Windows Networking Angst
Date: 10 Apr 1999 18:14:44 GMT
I have a question regarding IP Masquerading and Windows Networking.
Let me explain the situation.
Some of the diagrams below need to be viewed in a fixed-width font.
My old setup was thus: a windows network run using TCP/IP only. I was
in a domain called 'SCHOOL'
and could see the other computers in the domain from Network
Neighbourhood.
My machine name was 'WS102', and I needed to log into the NT domain
when windows started.
,-------------, ,----------------, ,------------------,
| ws102 |--| rest of domain |--| proxy & internet |
| [windows] | '----------------' '------------------'
'-------------'
Now that I have IP Masquerading setup the picture looks like this:
,-------------, ,-------------, ,----------------,
,------------------,
| ws102 |--| linux box |--| rest of domain |--| proxy &
internet |
| [windows] | '-------------' '----------------'
'------------------'
'-------------'
I hope those two are clear. The IP Masquerading works fine for ICQ,
IRC, FTP, web browsing etc.
The problem is that with the new setup I cannot see anything except
myself in Network
Neighbourhood. I used to be able to see about 40 other
computers/printers. My network admin,
while not helping me because it's against policy, says that they only
use TCP/IP not NetBEUI or
IPX or anything like that. (He's not allowed to help me, but doesn't
mind if I get it working).
Aside from not seeing the rest of my workgroup I cannot actually
authenticate via the NT server
in the domain. When I start up windows, and have to type in my
username and password there is a
pause before it says something along the lines of "Could not
authenticate credentials with NT
server. Access may be restricted to certain resources.". I wonder if
these two are connected.
I have wondered whether I need to use VPN or something like that?
Any advice so I can see the rest of my domain, and/or authenticate
would be most gratefully
received.
Regards,
Ollie Cook
Please remove the NXFHBT before replying by email.
***** Posted via the UK Online online newsreader *****
Go to http://www.ukonline.co.uk to find out
about other online services we offer our subscribers.
------------------------------
From: Paul Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.dial-up,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Help Please: Linux 2.2.5 and BT Speedway ISDN (honestly new question)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 20:19:34 +0100
Seyed Razavi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Use the 2.0.36 kernel. If you are using RedHat 5.2 do not use the
> kernel provided. Download either a suitable patch or get the kernel
> from a mirror of http://www.kernel.org
I found that out as well! Anyone know how RH produced a 2.0.36 kernel that
wasn't 2.0.36?
> Remember the BT Speedway is a Fritz ACM PCI PnP type. Whilst some have
> said it can be made to work under 2.2.x I think for us first timers it
> is much hard work.
Given it's only replacing a directory and some include files in the
kernel distribution, I don't think it's that much extra work. Also,
I think you can only get the compression with a 2.2.x kernel which
is a good reason for moving! (Using isdn.tar.gz on the 2.0.x kernel
may allow it to work, I'm not sure).
One thing I do find though is that with 2.2.x the line always drops
within a minute of inactivity. Using the idle parameteron ipppd doesn't
appear to have an effect. Has anyone a solution to this?
Paul
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralph Zeller)
Subject: Re: 286 diskless computers like terminals on linux
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 19:26:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to have X, and you have a fast network, try running vnc.
There is a version that works with dos and a packet driver.
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a network with some 286 (1Meg VGA Card) diskless / ethernet card.
>How can I make this computers, terminals (X terminals if possible) on a
>Linux box?
>Thanks,
>Tudor
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "James Holbrook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP connections problem with RedHat 5.2
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 10:34:01 -0700
Hello all;
New to this system and I keep hearing some people say windoze. What is
windoze?
Is it a new interface? What am I missing here. Or perhaps is it a way for
some to sooth their own insecurities?
jerzy Kaltenberg wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>
>hullsy wrote: use ezppp it will take 5 mins to setup its GUI stop messing
with the
>scripts
>Why not use MS windoze? You don't have to worry about any scripts there..
>
>
------------------------------
From: "JAGADISH KUMARAN(97D07013)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: different telnet and ftp
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:44:18 +0530
hi there Jiang
i guess you are new to linux and the networking world..
telnet is used to log onto a remote machine and do all kinds of weird
stuff on it..as though you were sitting right in front of it..you can
run your programs,check mail etc..
ftp is an acronym for File Transfer Protocol and is used for transferring
files from one machine to another...so that you can access your files
wherever you are logged in!
hope that it answers your question!!!
jug
On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, JiangLi wrote:
> Who can tell me what different between telnet and ftp?
>
> thanks
>
> JiangLI
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "JAGADISH KUMARAN(97D07013)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: TCP Port Reservation
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:58:01 +0530
you q aint clear..if you can be more precise it can be done..
if you have socket programming fundas then its ok..btw are u
the root of the machine you are interested in?
jug
------------------------------
From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What does this entry in /var/log/maillog mean????
Date: 10 Apr 1999 15:26:01 -0400
jmsalvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is someone using my dialup box to relay mail??? Have I been a victim?
it means they were trying to, but sendmail wouldn't let 'em.
--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.5 i586 | at public servers
Besides, it's good to force C programmers to use the toolbox occasionally. :-)
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What does this entry in /var/log/maillog mean????
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 20:53:40 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jmsalvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>I only have a dialup machine with sendmail installed .... But today I have
>this in my /var/log/maillog (domain names and IP addresses censored):
>
>
>Apr 10 16:33:28 localhost sendmail[623]: QAA00623: <~XTSEA@--snip-->... we do
>not relay
>
Someone identifying themselves as ~XTSEA@... tried to relay something
via your SMTP port...
>Apr 10 16:33:28 localhost sendmail[623]: QAA00623: ruleset=check_rcpt,
>arg1=<~XTSEA@--snip-->, relay=root@--snip-- [x.x.x.x], reject=551
><~XTSEA@@--snip-->... we do not relay
>
...but the attempt was rejected, error code 551, relaying not allowed.
>Apr 10 16:33:34 localhost sendmail[623]: QAA00623: from=<regproc@--snip-->,
>size=1669, class=0, pri=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, relay=root@--snip--
>[x.x.x.x]
>
This logs the receipt of a message from regproc@... The "relay" is the
machine the message came from, it should match the dotted IP address.
>
>Is someone using my dialup box to relay mail??? Have I been a victim?
>
Trying to, yes. It seems that the attempt was unsuccessful. However,
if you're concerned and/or it happens again then perhaps a mail to
postmaster@... enclosing some of the logs...
Might also be worth firewalling your SMTP port so that only yourself and
your ISP have access to send mail through it.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RT8029 Network Card. PLEASE HELP
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:16:11 -0700
Russ,
I have a few of these cards, theyre not bad. You need a utility that came
with the card to set the card, it runs in dos/win... dont bother with the
drivers on it for unix, they wont work. in linux you should use the ne2k-pci
network driver, it works fine. if you need to change the cards setting, you may
need to boot dos or windows to run the utility...
Jamie
Russ wrote:
> I have a friend - new comp. Network card is RealTek 8029 - Specifically not
> supported by the RealTek driver in the Kernel. Windows reports it's Base IO
> Range as E400 - E41F. What do I need to Use!!!
>
> Thanx
------------------------------
From: Daniel Charlebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Port Forwarding
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 15:13:05 -0500
If your VPN server is not on your gateway, you must configure a port on the
gateway
such that any packet received will be forwarded to the appropriate port onyour
VPN
server. I still think that ipfwadm or ipchain will allow this port mapping.
Daniel
ping wrote:
> Thanks for you input. I know I am able to connect to my work from home. So
> I am able to go from my internal lan to my work LAN but I would not be able
> to go the other way. For instance, if I had the VPN server I wanted to
> connect to at my house the only IP that is physically connected to the
> Internet is my Linux Gateway. So I need a way for that machine to forward
> the request to my VPN server on my network. Maybe there is a way through
> ipfwadm but I can't find anything on it in the HowTos or the Linux
> Networking book I bought.
>
> I sound confusing I am sure. Am I just dreaming or can this be done.
>
> Jim
> Daniel Charlebois wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I'm using a linux box as a gateway with ipfwadm policies set to
> >forward internal, private LAN packets to the internet. One of
> >my internal machines is a Win98 box running VPN to a server at
> >work. There were no special requirements for VPN, packets were
> >sent out correctly. I suspect that an ipfwadm or ipchain policy
> >could resolve your port forwarding problem. Unfortunately, I can't
> >tell you exactly which one, I can only point in that direction.
> >
> >Daniel
> >
> >ping wrote:
> >>
> >> I couldn't find IP tunneling in my HOWTOs or MINIs but I did on the Web.
> It
> >> looks like it is talking about VPN and PPTP. That is what I am doing
> >> ultimately but my problem right know is forwarding a port. I want to
> setup
> >> a VPN on my NT server at home going through my Linux IP masquerading
> gateway
> >> to the internet and have my work NT workstation connect to my home NT
> >> server. I need a way to get the Linux box to forward the request for the
> >> port to my NT server.
> >>
> >> I would think that this could be done but I can't figure it out.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the help,
> >> Jim
>
> >> >
> >> >> I would like to set up a PPTP connection from my home LAN to my work
> LAN.
> >> >> At home I have an NT network with Redhat 5.2 Linux as my gateway to
> the
> >> >> internet using IP Masquerading. It has a oneway cable modem that will
> >> only
> >> >> work with Linux and Windows 98 so I can't just hook it up to my NT
> >> Server.
> >> >> So what I want is to make a request for a PPTP connection from my work
> NT
> >> >> Workstation computer to the IP of my Linux box. The Linux box will
> see
> >> that
> >> >> a request for a certain port is coming in so it will forward that
> request
> >> to
> >> >> a different IP on my network, my NT server.
> >> >>
> >> >> Can this be done? If so what do I need to do?
> >> >>
> >> >> I have searched through Linux networking books and Linuxburg.com and
> >> >> Linux.org and cannot find anything on port forwarding. Maybe am
> calling
> >> it
> >> >> the wrong thing!
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanx for your help,
> >> >> Jim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Chang)
Crossposted-To: fastnet.help.unix
Subject: PPP help?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 20:21:38 GMT
Hello, Im have a problem connecting to my ISP "fast.net" which uses
PAP authentication. The problem seems to be in the message below
which comes from /var/sbin/messages. Anyone have an idea? It looks
as if its a serial port problem but I cant find any configuration
options for it when setting up the interface in X.
Apr 10 15:02:52 mchang pppd[1826]: Using interface ppp
Apr 10 15:02:52 mchang pppd[1826]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Apr 10 15:03:22 mchang pppd[1826]: LCP: timeout sending
Config-Requests
Apr 10 15:03:22 mchang pppd[1826]: Connection terminated
Apr 10 15:03:22 mchang pppd[1826]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
clean:
Apr 10 15:03:22 mchang pppd[1826]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Apr 10 15:03:23 mchang pppd[1826]: Exit.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Chang)
Subject: Re: PPP and chat script problem
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 20:25:21 GMT
If you find out would you please forward me the informatio as well? I
just posted the exact same problem. Thanks
On 10 Apr 1999 09:46:33 GMT, "Lee Howes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please E-mail replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not reply to this message.
>
>
>This is my log of the communication with virgin net for my ppp connection.
>This clearly does not work, do you have any idea what addition could make
>this work. (NOTE: password and username converted to dashes)
>Apr 10 09:41:53 localhost pppd[668]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>Apr 10 09:41:54 localhost chat[669]: send (ATDT0645505400^M)
>Apr 10 09:41:54 localhost chat[669]: expect (505400)
>Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: ATDT0645505400
>Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: -- got it
>Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: send (^M)
>Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: expect (ogin:)
>Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: ^M^M
>Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: login:
>Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: -- got it
>Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: send (--user--^M)
>Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: expect (assword:)
>Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: ^M
>Apr 10 09:42:53 localhost chat[669]: login: --user--^M
>Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost chat[669]: Password:
>Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost chat[669]: -- got it
>Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost chat[669]: send (--password--^M)
>Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost pppd[668]: Serial connection established.
>Apr 10 09:43:13 localhost pppd[668]: Using interface ppp0
>Apr 10 09:43:13 localhost pppd[668]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
>Apr 10 09:43:13 localhost pppd[668]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
>0x9a42a177> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Apr 10 09:43:40 localhost last message repeated 9 times
>Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
>Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: Connection terminated.
>Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
>clean:
>Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
>Apr 10 09:44:03 localhost pppd[668]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
>Apr 10 09:44:03 localhost pppd[668]: ioctl(TIOCSETD, N_TTY): Interrupted
>system call
>Apr 10 09:44:04 localhost pppd[668]: Exit.
>
>Thank you, Lee Howes
------------------------------
From: Jamie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP setup
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:26:31 -0700
Ryan,
you probably dont want to use minicom to do ppp, you can, but there are
better tools. try ppp-on, pppgo, or kppp (comes with kde). kppp is pretty easy
to do... you will to know things like your DNS and such, but about the easiest
ppp ive done on linux.
Jamie
Ryan wrote:
> Anybody,
>
> I recently installed rhl 5.2 on my PC and have been trying to get internet
> setup. When I use Minicom, my modem dials out fine, connects and lets me
> fill in my info (username, pword) but I'm not sure what to do next. I've
> been told to try
>
> pppd -d -detach /dev/modem &
>
> I've tested to see if that worked by typing
>
> ifconfig ppp0
>
> and it says ppp is running but when I try to go on netscape it can't connect
> to any site. I have my DNS numbers installed. Keep in mind that I am a
> BEGINNER.
>
> THANKS
------------------------------
From: Alan T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd server
Date: 10 Apr 1999 20:32:08 GMT
Hello, I am needing some assistance in setting up a pppd server on a linux
box. I have getty working fine, I can dial into the box and login and all
fine. My problem comes when I try to do the pppd -detach. It starts the
ppp connection up, but it gives me the error: ioctl(SIOCADDRT) device
route: Network is down.
The connection stays up however, it just does not pass any traffic, and I
notice on netstat -i that ppp0 is not listed. Anyone know what I am
missing here? I assume it might be a problem with my ifcfg-ppp0 file, but
am not sure. Thanks
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "Kevin L Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux+mac+pc network running Netware 3.22
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 15:36:45 -0500
As a relative newcomer to linux system administration I have a question
about the use of linux in a network running Novell Netware 3.22. Here is
the whole situation.
We have just added a Powermac G3 into our network for use as a graphics
workstation. It easily recognizes and prints to our networked printers. We
were able to get it to route through our gateway and get into the internet.
BUT, since it doesn't do ipx natively, we can't get it to log into our
netware server. Now from reading the Howto's, I see that a linux box can be
configured to be a NCP client and could mount the drives on the Netware
server. It can also be configured as an appletalk server. If I did both,
would the Mac be able to see the files on the netware server by using
appletalk or appleshare over IP? Or is there an easier way.
Any answers please forward to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: "Kevin Bates" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba help ?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 20:21:19 GMT
I have a samba server set up on a WinNT4 network for the purpose of sharing
it's 3 cd-rom drives to the network. However when you access the linux
server from a winnt workstation, it appears to be very slow to provide a
file listing of a cd rom's directory. If you go more than 3 directories
deep in a given cd or pick a directory with a lot of files in it, then it
is REALLY slow to display the directory contents. Half the time it will
actually time out and give an error message before displaying the file list.
The linux server is a P200 with 48MB of ram and a 70 MB swap partition. The
cd-roms are IDE 32x. Please ?!?
Any ideas would be very appreciated.
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Port Lord)
Subject: Writers wanted for zine articles.
Date: 10 Apr 1999 19:31:03 GMT
Columbia 2032 (C2032) is looking for individuals who would like to write
articles for our zine. Topics include: Phone systems (cellular/normal),
Cryptography, IRC, TCP/IP, Programmiung,Information Warfare, Computer Security
and just about anything pertaining to computers /or phones. We have been around
approximately 10 months. We just released our biggest (93.4k) and best edition
yet, which can be downloaded under 'library at www.homestead.com/c2032 . In our
effort to expand our distribution, quality, and quantity of the zine, we are
looking for more writers and or willing people to distribute the zine. Our
subscribers and writers consist of people from within the hack/phreak community
and professional individuals alike. Please send all responses to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . We are a freelance zine so if it is money you want please
dont respond.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Josh Gentry)
Subject: Re: Passwords readable in file passwd
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 11:33:42 -0800
How are you editing /etc/passwd? Are you using a GUI tool, or some other
software designed to create and manage accounts on Linux?
You should not edit passwd as a text file, at least for the password field.
No encoding of the password will result, and the use will not be able to log
in. You can create the account without a password, then, at the shell
prompt, use the "passwd" command to give the password an account.
Do this:
1. Create account without a password, or the string "null" in the passwd
field.
2. Exit GUI or editor
3. At shell prompt, type "passwd 'username'", where "username" is the
username of the account for which you want to change the password. Hit
<return>.
4. Follow the instructions.
You can use the "passwd" command on existing accounts, also.
Josh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**** Posted from RemarQ - http://www.remarq.com - Discussions Start Here (tm) ****
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail, what use
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:27:42 -0600
mist wrote:
> Jim Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
> >
> >> My machine is sitting on a network as a client, not a masqurading
> >> server or anything. So is there any reason to run sendmail?
> >>
> >
> >If you only get mail by POP3 and only send mail this way then
> >no, you don't need to run sendmail.
> Except for the fact that mail is not posted using pop3.
Some places do support using POP3 to send mail. In
principle it should be better than using smtp in fact, since
POP3 at least requires a username/password authentication to
work.
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
