Linux-Networking Digest #825, Volume #10 Sun, 11 Apr 99 21:13:55 EDT
Contents:
Hooking a LAN onto the net using a linux box! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RT8029 Network Card. PLEASE HELP (Thomas Welp)
Cisco router help ("Tony")
Re: Network problems ("Nesman")
Re: Linux as router? (Luca Filipozzi)
pppd and x server (newbie) (Laurent Ploix)
Re: Howto add a new network card?
Ipchains on a LAN...? (Peter Woytiuk)
chat doesn't work (Anke Grundmann)
RedHat 5.2 > Win9x. Where to start? ("Windows98NOT!")
Re: Cisco router help (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: Network problems (Luca Filipozzi)
PPTP Masquerade and Netbios Masquerade (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: ftp and telnet from windows 98 to redhat linux ("Larry Threewitt")
redhat 5.2 and 'make' ("Jason Kellington")
Re: 100baseT 3Com adapter problem - works fine under Windoz but not Linux (Kyu Rang
Kim)
Re: redhat 5.2 and 'make' (Ignacio Iturregui)
Re: Accessing same HD by Linux & WinNT (Mark)
Re: Downloads hanging - please help! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Can't ftp in special port through IPMASQ (Ben Short)
Basic instructions for setting up home network (newbie) ("Alan Clark")
Re: 2 Ethernet Cards - IRQ/Address Conflict? Help! (Conrad B Nelson)
dial-up ppp server for win95 ("Gordon Drake")
Re: DMA errors ("TURBO1010")
Re: Netgear ISA EA201c NIC (Allen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hooking a LAN onto the net using a linux box!
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 21:13:10 GMT
Hello!
I wrote here once before conserning this, but it don't seem to be posted, so
I'll try it again:
Me and some friends have connected our 3 PCs (Windows 98) into a little LAN
(Only using the standars TCP/IPX and IP stuff that comes with win98).
Now we have been offered a Cable modem so we are planning to use a linux box
as a router. the problem is:
Exactly WHAT do we need to be able to get all 3 win98 machines connected to
the Internet. I haven't got that much experience with linux, but I now some
stuff.
As far as I know, i need a machine with 2 NICs, and put that between the modem
and the LAN:
|------| |------| |-------|
|Modem | <-----------> |Linux | <-----------> | LAN |
|------| |------| |-------|
The thing is: WHAT kinda stuff is needed on the linux box?
Ip-masquerading?
I'll get right to the case:
I need HELP! :-)
Tell me ALL kinda stuff that is needed to be installed, and are there any
other HARDWARE needed (I can't possibly think of any)?
All protocols, all programs, just letmeknow! :-)
In advance, thanks ALOT!
Odd Arne Beck
informatics student
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Thomas Welp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RT8029 Network Card. PLEASE HELP
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:56:28 +0200
You have to use the Ne2000 compat�ble PCI nic driver. It is included in Suse
5.3 and 6.0
.
------------------------------
From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cisco router help
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:06:39 +0100
I inherited a whole network system which included a Cisco 2500 router.
The PC's on the network are running Linux 2.0.34.
I want to use MRTG to monitor my the bandwidth of my leased line going
through the router.
I installed and compiled MRTG and the software needed for it, but when I try
to run MRTG the connection to my router gets refused.
I am told my router will not accept SNMP connections, which is what MRTG
uses.
I am not sure what to really do, but I think it is something to do with the
configuration of the router.
I try telenetting into my router and get asked for a password, which is one
thing I did not inherit.
Do I need to access the router to configure it to accept SNMP connections?
If so how do I do this, and configure it to do so?
Has anyone come across this problem and solved it?
Any help would be appreciate.
Thanks
Tony
------------------------------
From: "Nesman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network problems
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 15:29:22 -0700
can you do this? on the hub? feel the headache already !!!
Nesman
APPANAH ravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi !!!
> I install a redhat 5.2 system.
> I configure the PC with 4 network cards :
> - 3 DLINK PCI 530 TX (IRQ 5, 9, 11 assigned to eth0, eth1 and
> eth2)
> - and 1 SMC ISA ULTA 8216C (IRQ 10 assigned to eth3)
>
> When I connect all the networks cards to the hub, the system didn't
> boot.
> When I connect only 1 network card to the hub, no problem...
> Can anyone help me ???
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Regards,
> Ravi APPANAH
>
>
> --
> Ravi APPANAH
> Product Validation & Support Engineer
> ------------------------------------------
> EolRinG International
> 10, rue Alfred Kastler
> 14000 Caen - FRANCE
> Tel : +33 (0)2 31 06 19 75
> Fax : +33 (0)2 31 06 19 76
> Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Web : http://www.eolring.fr
> ------------------------------------------
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Linux as router?
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 15:36:00 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Thanks for the info. Going for a floppy-based setup
> sounds like a good idea, although I'm not sure how
> well that will work on only 12 mb ram. If it doesn't,
> I might try having the hdd spin down, which is almost
> as good from a mechanical standpoint.
>
12MB is plenty... LinuxRouter isn't that big.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Laurent Ploix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pppd and x server (newbie)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:42:34 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
When I connect to the Internet with my modem (with ifup ppp0), my X
server doesn't allow any new window to open... "Can't open display".
Something wrong in my network setup ?
Thanks
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Howto add a new network card?
Date: 11 Apr 1999 22:32:10 GMT
Klas Eliasson wrote:
>
> >> Klas Eliasson wrote
> >>[in <01be7ce7$769ad220$0100a8c0@ntserver>]:
>
> >> I have a linux (redhat52) box. And i want to connect it to my
> >> network. I just bought a networkcard (ISA NE2000).
> >>
> >> How do I istall it in linux?
> > >
> >> Do I have to reinstall RedHat?
> >>
> >> I must somehow add the card - but where?
>
> > read Ethernet-HOWTO.
>
> > You don't need to reinstall REDHAT, let it find the card at the
> > boot time, or give the card's irq and base as a parameter at lilo
> > promt (or in conf.modules). RedHat has no problems with ne2000.
>
> WHAT ARE THE PARAMETERS GOING TO LOOK LIKE IN LILO??
> //klas , sweden
>
> > --
> > tsca
> > Tomasz Sienicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have run into the issue with a little linux box of my onw. It doesn't
want to recognize the nic. I have not been able to access the conf.module
file either.
> > any ideas?
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Woytiuk)
Subject: Ipchains on a LAN...?
Date: 11 Apr 1999 22:51:19 GMT
Hi,
I'm a newbie to networking with Linux, and I've struggled with this
for a while now. I have two computers on a small LAN - one is a Linux
box with a cable modem connection that is split between the two. I
have been trying without any success to get the second computer to
access the cable modem, and have gotten nothing but frustrated. I've
read the Net-3 and the Ipchains HOWTO and am still no further along.
On the Linux box, eth0 is connected to the LAN and eth1 to the 'Net;
eth0 has an address of 192.168.0.1, and the other computer
192.168.0.2. What I tried to do with Ipchains was detect all packets
coming from 192.168.0.2 and send them on to eth1, but this did not
work:
ipchains -N LAN
ipchains -A input -s 192.168.0.2 -d 192.168.0.1 -j LAN
ipchains -A LAN -i eth1 -j ACCEPT
The LAN works on TCP, specifying the protocol made no difference.
I know I should add another set of rules for packets going to the
other computer from the 'Net, but I'm not sure how to go about that;
I would like to masquerade the packets. Is there anyone that has
had success with this? Is there any documentation I should be
reading - I couldn't find anything else in the HOWTOs. Any help
would be greatly appreciated,
Peter
--
[- Make it idiot-proof, and someone will make a better idiot -]
** Junk mail sent to this address will be subject to **
** a $100.00 proof-reading fee. Sending of such **
** material constitutes acceptance of these terms **
------------------------------
From: Anke Grundmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: chat doesn't work
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:33:31 +0200
I have a strange probkem.
When I am trying to dial out with "minicom" my modem works fine.
But when I am using "chat" nothing happens. I see the command given to
the modem (at), but the modem doesn't respond.
Thomas
------------------------------
From: "Windows98NOT!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 5.2 > Win9x. Where to start?
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 18:00:25 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the scoop. I have a Win95 box and a Linux (RedHat 5.2) box. I
only have 1 modem and I want the RedHat box to act as an IP and file
server. I also want to be let either machine borrow the other's printer.
The Winbox has a color printer (Canon BJC-250) While the Linux machine
has a Panasonic dot matrix printer. (not set up yet.) I also want to be
able to retrieve files between the two.
How to I set up the Linux machine to talk to the winbox? How do I set up
the Winbox to talk to Linux? What is best to use Samba or IP Masquerade?
Are they one and the same? HELP!
I have asked these questions in this newsgroup before but I was unable
to retrieve the answers before they were dropped from the server. Any
reposting would be appreciated. How about top notch books on the subject
that are not going to make me run up the national debt trying to figure
this out.
The whole idea again is I am trying to make Linux do the dialing for my
Windoze box. (and act as a firewall.) along with the basics of printer
and file sharing.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Cisco router help
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:18:03 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I inherited a whole network system which included a Cisco 2500 router.
> The PC's on the network are running Linux 2.0.34.
> I want to use MRTG to monitor my the bandwidth of my leased line going
> through the router.
> I installed and compiled MRTG and the software needed for it, but when I try
> to run MRTG the connection to my router gets refused.
> I am told my router will not accept SNMP connections, which is what MRTG
> uses.
> I am not sure what to really do, but I think it is something to do with the
> configuration of the router.
> I try telenetting into my router and get asked for a password, which is one
> thing I did not inherit.
> Do I need to access the router to configure it to accept SNMP connections?
> If so how do I do this, and configure it to do so?
> Has anyone come across this problem and solved it?
> Any help would be appreciate.
> Thanks
> Tony
>
>
>
>
Yes, you need to telnet to your router to be able to change its config.
Therefore, you need either to get the password or call Cisco to reset
your router.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Network problems
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:19:34 -0700
In article <7er7n2$n78$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> can you do this? on the hub? feel the headache already !!!
>
> Nesman
>
> APPANAH ravi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi !!!
> > I install a redhat 5.2 system.
> > I configure the PC with 4 network cards :
> > - 3 DLINK PCI 530 TX (IRQ 5, 9, 11 assigned to eth0, eth1 and
> > eth2)
> > - and 1 SMC ISA ULTA 8216C (IRQ 10 assigned to eth3)
> >
> > When I connect all the networks cards to the hub, the system didn't
> > boot.
> > When I connect only 1 network card to the hub, no problem...
> > Can anyone help me ???
They all have unique ip addresses? They all have default routes?
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: PPTP Masquerade and Netbios Masquerade
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:27:38 -0700
I'm already using John Hardin's PPTP Masquerade patch. (Very good work,
John!)
Now I have different scenario. I was helping somebody out... their
configuration is as follows:
NT domain with PDC BDC etc
|
Linux Masquerading Router/Firewall
|
98 Client
I know all about LMHOSTS etc. But that only works if the linux box is a
router and not a masquerading firewall... this is because the MS domain
stuff uses a lot of RPC and masquerading interferes with that. (I'm
infereing here.... i may be totally wrong).
I'm wondering if anyone has managed to get this scenario to work...
whether there is any "netbios masquerade" patch similar to John Hardin's
PPTP stuff.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "Larry Threewitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ftp and telnet from windows 98 to redhat linux
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 18:16:54 -0500
Brian Alexander wrote in message <7eqrvq$70c$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello;
>
>I have a similar problem with my W95 <-> RH5.1 setup. I can ping from linux
>to W95 and ping from W95 to linux. (round trip is between 1 and 2 ms).
>However, I cannot establish a telnet session.
>
>Other details that may be of use: two clients on W95 MS and Novell. IP:
>Linux 130.5.5.5. W95 130.5.5.6 Netmask 255.0.0.0
>
>Any help appreciated.
>
>Brian.
>
>
did you use adduser and create a user account? RH disables
remote root telnet and ftp access by default.
enjoy,
l
------------------------------
From: "Jason Kellington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: redhat 5.2 and 'make'
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 23:34:54 GMT
i've just installed RH5.2 off fo a distibution CD. (kernel 2.0.36) and
was/am in the process of upgrading my kernel to 2.2.5. However, when i go
to run 'make config', bash can't find the 'make' command. Is this supposed
to be there? If not(or if so) how do I get it and install it (I'm a newbie,
so be easy on me, please)
Thanx
Jason Kellington
------------------------------
From: Kyu Rang Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 100baseT 3Com adapter problem - works fine under Windoz but not Linux
Date: 12 Apr 1999 09:03:05 +0900
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Renaud) writes:
> I don't know if I make any sense, but if someone knows how to force
> the card to put itself in 100Mb/s mode at boot, then I will be happy.
>
edit your /etc/conf.modules
it look like this
alias eth0 3c59x
options eth0 options=0
options=0 means the card (905b) determines the speed and duplexity.
available options are (included in the 3c59x.c)
0 10baseT, or use default setting.
1 10Mbps AUI
2 undefined (special case: 10baseT from the LILO prompt)
3 10base2 (BNC)
4 100base-TX
5 100base-FX
6 MII (always the correct transceiver type on the 3c905)
8
16 Full-duplex bit
16 10baseT full-duplex
20 100baseTx full-duplex
32 Bus-master enable bit (experimental use only!)
the newest source code and more info for 3c905x driver could be found at:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
--
Kyu Rang Kim < krkim @ plantpath . snu . ac . kr > Linuxer
Plant Disease Epidemiology Lab. Seoul National University
Phone : +82-19-256-9991 http://plantpath.snu.ac.kr/krkim
------------------------------
From: Ignacio Iturregui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: redhat 5.2 and 'make'
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:02:53 GMT
Jason Kellington wrote:
> i've just installed RH5.2 off fo a distibution CD. (kernel 2.0.36) and
> was/am in the process of upgrading my kernel to 2.2.5. However, when i go
> to run 'make config', bash can't find the 'make' command. Is this supposed
> to be there? If not(or if so) how do I get it and install it (I'm a newbie,
> so be easy on me, please)
>
> Thanx
> Jason Kellington
Did you unpacked the kernel.tar under /usr/src???? So it will make a directory
called linux under /usr/src.
Make sure you did this.
------------------------------
From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Accessing same HD by Linux & WinNT
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:03:56 GMT
Steven R. Levitt wrote:
>
> Yes, I am successfully using samba for basic file sharing, but I don't
> really care for the FTP like interface. So, I'm also using smbfs and
> struggling to get autofs to deal with my WinNT shares. But that's another
> story.
>
> Will samba support running Linux executables residing on FAT and/or NTFS
> partitions?
>
> Bill Garrett wrote in message <7dqfos$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hi Steven,
> >
> >This may sound obvious and I am sure you have thought about it but why not
> >just use Samba and mount the volume on the Linux box using an NT share ?
> >
> >If your talking about sharing the HDD across one physical bus then I
> >wouldn't be sure that it is possible without some proprietary hardware
> >involved and that would obviously be expensive. I can think of any solution
> >that wouldn't use SCSI or FC-AL and be provided by some-one like your
> >DEC/EMC/IBM/BoxHill's of this world.
> >
> >Bill
um. the latest samba lets you mount the NT share into the linux filesystem
then move around in it as if it was local.
Works on my machine at work anyway.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Downloads hanging - please help!
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 00:07:06 GMT
I don't think that the 'internet is busy' applies in this case. I've
experienced similar problems, but my PPP connection is actually through a
win95 box running SyGate.
I get to about 100k to 125k and my Netscape download window displays
'stalled'. At other times, it will seem to download the entire file, i.e. the
window says 100%, but the window just hangs there with that stop button just
staring at me. Of course, I can see the file in the dir I downloaded it to,
but if I go hit the stop button, kiss it goodbye.
I know someone is going to flame me, but I can return to my win95 box and
download the same file with no problems. <:/
I know some may suggest it's a problem with SyGate, but sounds like Scott is
having a similar problem with PPP on his box without the gateway software
thrown into the mix.
Any ideas, anyone?
In article <7eiqaj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Peter MacKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you are having a problem it is just that the internet is busy.
> I have had the same thing happen many times. Just right click and reload.
>
> To prove this, go some where a little less busy and try to down load
> something big ( > 1 meg)
>
> if this works you do not have a problem, it's just that everybody wants the
> same file you want. Look for a mirror.
>
> Just for fun though go to a command line and run df -h to make sure you
> arn't full any where.
>
> Scott E. Regener wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >I can't begin to express how incredibly frustrating this is for me. I'm a
> >Linux newbie who has accomplished some very basic things so far: I've
> >recompiled a kernel, gotten X and sound to work on an IBM Thinkpad 310ED
> and in
> >general been impressed with the stability and performance of Linux (RH 5.2)
> but
> >I've run into a problem that no one in the comp.os.linux.setup newsgroup
> could
> >help with: some files will not download, no matter what method I try to
> >download them. Other files, often from the same site, download without any
> >problems at all. Activity ceases on the download, but other TCP/IP packets
> fly
> >right through. Can anyone help me?
> >
> >About my setup: Kernel 2.2.4 & 2.2.5 tried, PPP connection (in kernel),
> RedHat
> >5.2 for almost everything.
> >
> >One file that consistantly fails, regardless of the site I try to pull it
> from
> >is kde-base-1.1-whatever.rpm. Hangs just after the 100K point. NCFTP
> reports
> >'Error: Connection timed out. Transfer aborted.' Netscape Communicator
> just
> >reports "stalled" forever. KFM gives no error, but activity stops.
> >
> >If anyone has ideas, I'd love to hear them. I've tried looking for an
> updated
> >PPPD but haven't the foggiest where to look beyond mirrors of redhat
> >distributions (which have the exact same rpm that I have installed
> already.)
> >Like I said, I'm a newbie. Please help!
> >
> > --
> >Scott E. Regener
> >DSS Since 7/95
> >DVD Since 6/98
> >
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Short)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Can't ftp in special port through IPMASQ
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:15:26 +1000
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Hello,
>
> I got a IPmasq network setup for couple of years. Everything works fine
> and great. My system is RH 5.1, 2.0.36. Yesterday I just try to login a
> ftp site from Ipmasq client machine (running W95), the ftp site requires
> special port number other than 21. I got a messagge " 530 Only Client
> IP address allowed for PORT command" in Cuteftp software in the Win95
> client.
>
> Question, does the ipmasq_ftp module support ftp through special port?
> If not, what can I do?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kelvin
>
>
It should do, but you would have to manually install the mod. It works
for me if I do:
rmmod ip_masq_ftp
insmod ip_masq_ftp ports=20,21,otherport,etc
Hope this helps
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-
Ben Short mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shortboy Productions http://www.shortboy.ddns.org
------------------------------
From: "Alan Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Basic instructions for setting up home network (newbie)
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 18:24:06 -0600
Hi,
I have two computers here, one is a linux/win98(192.168.0.2) machine and the
other is a win98 (192.168.0.1) computer which is a proxy host to the
internet. They are connected to each other via a 10mbit ethernet connection
which works fine under windows 98. I am now trying to connect the linux to
the windows 98 so I can transfer files, telnet etc, hopefully get the linux
machine onto the internet someday. I have configured the ethernet card
under linux and I think it is ok as a confirmation message is shown at
boot-up, and the interface 'eth0' is up and running and pointing to the
'tulip' module which corresponds to my ethernet card.
However, I have tried going through the NET-3-HOWTO and other docs but I
dunno, I can't seem to understand what it is saying. If anybody could give
me a basic configuration for this (I am trying to using 'netcfg') just to
get something up and running. I simply do not know what to put into the
edit boxes here. I am not sure if samba is called for or not.
Any help or pointers would be much appreciated. I know I'm clueless but
hey, I'm learning.
Also perhaps a mini-howto on how to set up basic functionality as this would
be helpful.
------------------------------
From: Conrad B Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: 2 Ethernet Cards - IRQ/Address Conflict? Help!
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 00:38:52 GMT
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============08F8AB51773B253B2886862F
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Simon Morley wrote:
> The cards are both RealTek RTL8029 and show now way of changing the IRQ with
> setup programs.
> I can change the bas address - but what to & will is that gonna help as the
> two are already using different addresses?
> Thanks.
>
> pv wrote in message ...
> >Simon Morley wrote in message <7ep6kl$vvc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >[...]
> >>Is there anything I can do to fix this other than buying a new card with
> >>jumpers?
> >sure there is.. a jumperless card comes with a setup disk
> >where u can change the base address and irq. No prob..
> >if u are missing the disk download one from the net!!
> >it's dos, so have ur dos boot disk handy ;-)
> >
> >good luck
> >pv
> >
> >
Are these cards PCI if so check the config of your PCI bus it could be
assigning the same IRQ to both Cards.
Conrad
==============08F8AB51773B253B2886862F
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="cnelson.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Conrad B Nelson
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="cnelson.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Nelson;Conrad
tel;work:215.648.2339
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:http://www.Cognos.com
org:Cognos Corporation
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Solutions Specialist
adr;quoted-printable:;;Two Valley Square=0D=0A512 Township Line Road=0D=0ASuite
125;Blue Bell;PA;19422;
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Conrad Nelson
end:vcard
==============08F8AB51773B253B2886862F==
------------------------------
From: "Gordon Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dial-up ppp server for win95
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 10:47:10 +1000
What i want to do is to creat a dialup server that win95 can connect to.
Sort of like an ISP does.
What I have done so far
I have got getty up and runing but i have no idea how to set up the pppd.
HELP
I NEED HHHHHHHEEEEEEELLLLLLPPPP.
If someone is kind enough to reply with an answer. I would be most happy.
>From a linux commmunity member
(-;p Chris Drake ;-) a k a The Discovery
------------------------------
From: "TURBO1010" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux.caldera,alt.linux,alt.linux.sux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: DMA errors
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 16:38:49 -0700
It's an HX chipset, and disabling UDMA in the bios took the errors away.
Trying SCSI now, just can't get it to recognize my Adaptec 2940U2W.
Nick Lucent wrote in message ...
>On Fri, 09 Apr 1999 09:42:32 GMT, Wiley Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
><>On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 14:49:12 -0800, "TURBO1010"
><><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
><>
><>>Why, after updating the bios on my Tyan 1564/D do I get DMA errors on
all the hard drives, and tells me DMA not available.
><>> It tells me bad CRC. What does it mean? It used to work fine with
version 1.01, now with 1.02 it gives me this error.
>
>That board has an fx chipset, Im almost positive that fx doesnt support
>udma, I got errors when I enabled some udma option in the bios, when I
>disabled it the errors went away, Im using a wd 6.4 gb drive and I know its
>udma, but disabling that option got rid of the errors which is the
important
>thing. Try it and see if it works.
>
>Nick
>
><>
><>>>
><>>>Don't know. Did you save the old bios? I did have a simular problem
though,
><>>>with a Tyan board. My hardisk was on their list (Tyan's) as being
having
><>>>buggy firmware and so I could not use DMA with the CD-Rom that was
><>>>Slaving off of it. I believe that the real problem was that the CD-Rom
><>>>wasn't UDMA and the HD was. Later I added a CD, Moved the
><>>> old cd to the second interface as a master. I didn't have anymore
><>>> problems.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Netgear ISA EA201c NIC
Date: 12 Apr 1999 00:46:19 GMT
Truthfuly, I don't know, but I'd guess that you may need to boot to DOS, and use
their setup program to initialize the card first...
HTH
On 11 Apr 1999 02:07:06 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. P.) wrote:
>Anybody knows if this network card is supported by Linux?
>I want to connect my new P-2 PCI system with my old '486 ISA-bus PC
>and when I bought a Netgear FA 310TX NIC for my new PC (which I know
>is supported by Linux), I thought getting its ISA version for the '486
>PC would be just perfect. Especially because I saw no indication on the
>box that it was a PnP NIC. However, after I opened the box at home,
>it showed no jumpers at all and the docs indicate it is a PnP card.
>For non-PnP Windows 95 systems they provide a setup program to set
>IRQ, port adress and such with software. But that may not help me
>much in Linux.
>
>So before I even try to install it, I thought I better ask it here if
>anybody had any success with this Netgear EA201c NIC.
>
>Thanks,
>Joe
Allen
(email addy; user ID portion has a numeral one in place of word
onespoiler, and of course, delete the bogus secondary domain of nospam.)
PC/hardware Guru, and Linux Newbie
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
