Linux-Networking Digest #849, Volume #10 Wed, 14 Apr 99 02:13:37 EDT
Contents:
Automount of Win98 drive (Daniel Charlebois)
Connect to SAMBA in NT Domain < w98 requests password ("Steve Jorgensen")
Only last 24 bits passed to request-route. Normal? ("Steve Jorgensen")
Re: Importance of securing systems (John Meissen)
Re: Linux and IBM 3151 (Andy Carlson)
Re: Using ipchains to block ICQ. (mist)
Re: IP chain rule syntax Question/Problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Printing to novell 4.11 server ("Kevin R Baugh")
Re: how to use IP-adres in firewall script (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: modem sharing (Nathan Rosales)
Re: SMC1211 Driver -- unresolved dependency! (Jeffrey Rice)
PAP chatscript problems (Eric Mak)
Re: eth0 hangs ppp... modem/nic conflict? (Chris Leger)
Supra Express modem not resetting ("Russell S. DiPesa")
Writing my first script, Help ("RensFunHog")
Re: Support for Intel 8/16 Lan Adapter? ("Benjamin Hendricks")
Re: qmail hell (Sim)
Re: Writing my first script, Help ("Curt")
SAMBA, GUI for dummies like me. ("Windows98NOT!")
Re: Plz help me!! pppd doesn't work. ("Curt")
modem sharing ("Darrin")
Re: 3 com 3c905b TX network card problems... ("HiVizDiver")
Re: modem sharing ("Eugene")
Re: Importance of securing systems (Andreas Dilger)
really slow 100Mb ethernet (dude)
Re: Static NAT with Linux (Luca Filipozzi)
Re: 3 com 3c905b TX network card problems... ("ryan")
TrackDown IP Address (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
SMB/95 (Burke Martin)
SMB/95 (Burke Martin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Daniel Charlebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Automount of Win98 drive
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:07:15 -0500
Has anyone been able to setup automount to mount a Win98 drive
off another machine? I've got smbmount running no problem, but
I'd like to take it to the next step with automounting. I've
got mount-2.8a, but when if forks the smbmount process, it
doesn't provide the appropriate command line. Should mount
or smbmount be modified to be more compatible or is automount
somehow able to handle smb mount?
Thanks,
Daniel
------------------------------
From: "Steve Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connect to SAMBA in NT Domain < w98 requests password
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:21:55 -0700
I have configured Linux SAMBA to be a member of a domain where I have a
Windows NT Domain server on the LAN. For testing purposes, I have shared
/tmp as available to all. When I try to connect to SAMBA from a Windows 98
machine that is logged on to the same NT Domain, it asks me for a password.
Any way to get SAMBA to trust the NT Domain?
------------------------------
From: "Steve Jorgensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Only last 24 bits passed to request-route. Normal?
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:15:17 -0700
I basically have demand dialing and ipmasq working, but I've noticed
something odd. When I echo $1 to a file from request-route, it shows an
address like xxx.yyy.zzz where the first (high order) byte portion of the
address is missing. Is this normal? Is there something I need to fix?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Meissen)
Subject: Re: Importance of securing systems
Date: 14 Apr 1999 04:07:47 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Belgarion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Here are the attempts extracted from the log file(s). As you can see,
>>they come from all over:
>
> That's all the connections you've had? Damn...
it was a slow period ;-)
>
> Paranoia if you ask me. I have a machine on a dynamic 28.8k dialup and
>get at least this many connections. If you IRC, you're asking for
>connections like this, especially if you hang out in a place with a lot of
>unix geeks.
Don't use IRC. Don't seem to have the time.
> I wouldn't worry about it too much, if someone was going out of their
>way to crack your system they would have been trying a hell of a lot harder
>than to hit you twice and give up.
I don't worry. It's just an interesting data point. If I see someone
make repeated attempts I forward the log file entries along with
a complaint to their ISP; I figure if they're poking at my system they're
probably actively trying to get into other systems, too.
>
> After all, if you really want to lock down your system just comment out
>all the lines in /etc/inetd.conf and killall -HUP inetd :)
>
I could turn the power off, too :-)
I wonder...I never thought about it before, but does going through
a proxy server mask your address?
john-
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Carlson)
Subject: Re: Linux and IBM 3151
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:01:27 -0500
In article <aTbO2.24928$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bob Bevins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone successfully connected IBM3151 terminals to the serial ports on
> linux?
>
I have not hooked them to serial ports, but I have telneted, and the
ibm3151 is in my /etc/termcap. Works fine.
--
Andy Carlson |\ _,,,---,,_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_
BJC Health System |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
St. Louis, Missouri '---''(_/--' `-'\_)
Cat Pics: http://www.nothnbut.net/~andyc/animal.html
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using ipchains to block ICQ.
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 1999 11:34:04 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jan Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Helping out to transition from msproxy to squid on a local school.
> The staff
>has expressed a desire to kill all ICQ usage, does anyone have a good
> rule
>to block out the ICQ servers? the tighter the better?
>
Ipchains?
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j DENY -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d icq.mirabilis.com
Assuming the boxes forward their stuff through the linux box. And
repeat that line replacing icq.mirabilis.com with the names of the icq
servers.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP chain rule syntax Question/Problem
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 04:19:04 GMT
Okay I know that I don't have the answer but you might be able to help
me... what did you do to get icq to work with firewall and ipchains. I
have my firewall working but apparently I have more of a global
setting and I am thinking that I need to set up each port input/ouput
seperately... not sure where to start though... just looking for the
format
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 21:42:06 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I have ipchains working on 2.2.3 SUSE box and have www,ssh,irc,icq etc
>working. But the problem lies in the NNTP server from ISP I wish to get
>usenet from. I have gave the address at the start of the script and
>NEWS_SERVER=""
>
>Now the chain rule:
>#NNTP NEWS client (119)
># ----------------------
>ipchains -A input -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p tcp ! -y \
>-s $NEWS_SERVER 119 \
>
>-d $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS -j ACCEPT
>ipchains -A output -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p tcp \
>-s $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS \
>-d $NEWS_SERVER 119 -j ACCEPT
>
>Does anyone see anything wrong with the chain rule syntax? Any information
>would be greatly appreciated. Oh and yes the address of the usenet server is
>correct and it is up as it returns a ping. Thanx GSM
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Kevin R Baugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing to novell 4.11 server
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 04:55:07 -0500
Thanks that works. but I am still unable to make it work from WP or form the
test page. any config files that I don't know about. I don't see any how to
for Novell?
--
Kevin R Baugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ezl.com/~krbaugh
http://www.ezl.com/~krbaugh/carla
Andras Gefferth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Kevin R Baugh wrote:
>
> > I can't seem to get Red Hat Linux 5.2 to print to a Novell 4.11 server.
When
> > I print the test page It says that it printed but nothing prints. I get
the
> > same results with WP. Any help please?
>
> Try running nprint manually!
> It is included in the ncpfs package,
> I have no problem running it with Novell 4.11
>
> Andras Gefferth
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: how to use IP-adres in firewall script
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 14:59:17 -0700
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I want to run a firewallscript from commandline.
>
> IPADDR=`/sbin/ifconfig ipp p0 | /bin/grep 'inet addr' | /usr/bin/cut
> -f >2 -d: | /usr/bin/cut -f 1 -d' '`
>
> ipchains -A input -p udp -j DENY -d $IPADDR 137:139 gives an error.
>
> How can i generate my ip-addres?
> What is the right syntax?
>
>
don't you need to export IPADDR to the environment.
setenv IPADDR yadayada for csh or tcsh
export IPADDR=yadayada for sh, ksh, or bash
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Nathan Rosales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem sharing
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 04:21:12 GMT
Not the same thing. The "modem sharing" alluded to here refers to the
capability that
allows software to see a modem on a remote host as a local modem. I'm
not aware of anything on Linux that does this.
Eugene wrote:
>
> www.linux.org/help
> read IP masquerading howto
>
> --
> "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
> "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
>
> Darrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > I know there's an add on deal for a Novell file server to share a modem
> > (serial) line across the network.
> >
> > I was wondering, can I set a Linux box up to share the modem and have a
> > windows box on the network that thinks that the shared serial port is a
> > local port and be able to use it. (try to say that in one breath)
> >
> > I hope you understand what I'm saying. I think it's call Funk WanderLink.
> >
> > Anyone have info in this???
> > Thanks
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: Jeffrey Rice
Subject: Re: SMC1211 Driver -- unresolved dependency!
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 23:31:28 -0400
Jeffrey Rice wrote:
> Hi,
> I have an SMC1211 PCI Ethernet card... maybe that's problem number
> 1.
>
> I believe that the RealTek 8129/39 drivers can be used instead, or
> so the source I got says. So I'm trying to get rtl8139.c to compile
> properly, but it's a pain. The command I'm using (from the file) is
> gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c rtl8139.c '[
> -f /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h ] && echo -DMODVERSIONS
>
> However, I get a message saying modversions isn't found. I don't
> understand that, because I can it is there. Without it, I get an
> unresolved dependency when I boot up.
>
> Anyone out there have this card working who can please give me some
> help?? cc by email if you don't mind.
>
Opps, I goofed a bit. The error I'm getting is "unresolved symbol", not
dependency. I'm missing an header file, right? I'm lost...
Jeff
------------------------------
From: Eric Mak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAP chatscript problems
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:24:13 +1000
I also followed the instructions in axiom.physics.ubc.ca/ppp-linux.html
supplied by ts and everything worked fine, but pppd fails with the
chatscript automation, even when I simply copy out the pppd command into
a script. Does anyone know the reason for this?
------------------------------
From: Chris Leger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eth0 hangs ppp... modem/nic conflict?
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 00:29:38 -0400
Mark, Clifford,
Thanks a million! Problem is fixed at last!
...now on to IP Masquerading...
Mark Nielsen wrote:
>
> >NETWORKING=yes
> >FORWARD_IPV4=yes
> >HOSTNAME=columbia
> >DOMAINNAME=
> >GATEWAY=192.168.1.254
> >GATEWAYDEV=eth0
>
> I didn't read any of the routing commands you did.
> Set GATEWAY to nothing
> GATEWAY=
>
> Make sure the ppp0 (if using RedHat in particular) is set to take the
> default route when activated.
>
> This seems to solve my problems.
> I don't have any routing commands in my files.
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Nielsen "Where 98 has no meaning."
> www.tcu-inc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The Computer Underground, Inc. 614-485-0506
> computers, programming, networking, Perl, PHP, SQL, HTMl, Linux, Unix
------------------------------
From: "Russell S. DiPesa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Supra Express modem not resetting
Date: 13 Apr 1999 21:40:10 GMT
My Redhat 5.2 box is acting as a ppp and pop3 server. If a dialup
connection is aborted by the user midway through the handshake, the Supra
Express 56K external modem that is connected to cua0 is not being reset.
If you attempt to dial into the modem again, the modem will not pick up.
It will just ring and ring. Any ideas why?
Russ
------------------------------
From: "RensFunHog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Writing my first script, Help
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 23:28:44 -0500
I am trying to write a script. I am using vi. In just a test I enter vi
practice, I insert one line like ls, then I escape,enter :x to save file.
Then to verify I run cat practice and view the text line. Then I enter
"chmod +x practice" without the quotes. This should create an executable
file. If I type "practice" I get an echo command not found. I have gone over
this time and time, but can't find what I'm doing wrong. I even started
xwindows and looked at the file permissions in xfm, and they showed
executable. Any ideas??
------------------------------
From: "Benjamin Hendricks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Support for Intel 8/16 Lan Adapter?
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:46:49 -0400
Sounds like you have an Intel EtherExpress NIC. I use these things all the
time (got a bunch second-hand) and don't have any problems. Download the
setup program from Intel and make sure the card is on a happy IRQ and I/O
(it isn't PnP).
Regards,
Benjamin Hendricks
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Howdy,
>
> I'm trying to install Linux on an machine with what appears to be an
> "Intel 8/16 Lan Adapter" (this is stamped on the card [ISA]).
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sim)
Subject: Re: qmail hell
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:51:04 GMT
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999 13:34:56 GMT, "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Is there a RPM for qmail or must the user compile the source ? TIA Keith
>
It's not too difficult - take a look at
home.tvd.be/ws35056/linux/mail.htm for documentation of my experiences
Simon
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Writing my first script, Help
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 23:35:34 -0500
Your local directory probably isn't in your path.
Add . to your path or execute it like this:
./practice
RensFunHog wrote in message <7f15ge$qmd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am trying to write a script. I am using vi. In just a test I enter vi
>practice, I insert one line like ls, then I escape,enter :x to save file.
>Then to verify I run cat practice and view the text line. Then I enter
>"chmod +x practice" without the quotes. This should create an executable
>file. If I type "practice" I get an echo command not found. I have gone
over
>this time and time, but can't find what I'm doing wrong. I even started
>xwindows and looked at the file permissions in xfm, and they showed
>executable. Any ideas??
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Windows98NOT!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SAMBA, GUI for dummies like me.
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 19:14:19 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://us1.samba.org/samba/GUI/
That is the link for the GUI's for SAMBA. I have been cruizing the samba
web page. Very useful information.
Hope those confused by SAMBA find this helpful.
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Plz help me!! pppd doesn't work.
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 23:39:08 -0500
Try using the network configurator from X windows. It creates the chat
scripts for you.
Minjung Kim wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi!
>I'm newbie in linux.
>I tried to connect to my ISP with ppp.
> --- #>/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 57600 debug connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v
>`` AT OK ATD01432 CONNECT '\d\c'"
>But the modem didn't dial and log message is below.
>---
>Apr 13 12:22:35 localhost pppd[341]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>Apr 13 12:22:36 localhost chat[342]: expect (AT)
>Apr 13 12:23:21 localhost chat[342]: alarm
>Apr 13 12:23:21 localhost chat[342]: Failed
>Apr 13 12:23:21 localhost pppd[341]: Connect script failed
>Apr 13 12:23:22 localhost pppd[341]: Exit.
>Apr 13 12:24:35 localhost kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
>unregistered
>---
>How can I do ??? Plz help me!!
>My sytem is RedHat 5.2.
>
------------------------------
From: "Darrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: modem sharing
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 15:32:54 -0700
I know there's an add on deal for a Novell file server to share a modem
(serial) line across the network.
I was wondering, can I set a Linux box up to share the modem and have a
windows box on the network that thinks that the shared serial port is a
local port and be able to use it. (try to say that in one breath)
I hope you understand what I'm saying. I think it's call Funk WanderLink.
Anyone have info in this???
Thanks
------------------------------
From: "HiVizDiver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3 com 3c905b TX network card problems...
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 18:38:32 -0400
I have successfully done the FTP install of Redhat Linux 5.2 using a
3Com 3C509B NIC. (Dunno about the tx, but the circa 1994 509B seems to work
fine.) I wasn't able to complete the install, because I apparently didn't
have the entire distro on the server, but the card connected just fine
through the network, and found the hdlist and everything else, so I presume
that Redhat 5.2 will support the card just fine.
-Jeff
--
Jeff Wilson
Company Manager and Webmaster
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.vastage.com
kctiw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7ev127$jog$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> i am a new comer of linux, i have installed redhat 5.2 with kernel ver.
> 2.0.36-0.7. Now i have problem with the 3c905b nic. I read thru quite a
> number of the Qs posted in newsgroup, but none of the suggestion or help
are
> understadable to me.
>
> So, to simplify the question, can really this version of linux support for
> 3c905b nic?? Or should i upgrade to the latest version of the kernel??
>
> Thanks.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem sharing
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 22:42:34 GMT
www.linux.org/help
read IP masquerading howto
--
"Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
Darrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I know there's an add on deal for a Novell file server to share a modem
> (serial) line across the network.
>
> I was wondering, can I set a Linux box up to share the modem and have a
> windows box on the network that thinks that the shared serial port is a
> local port and be able to use it. (try to say that in one breath)
>
> I hope you understand what I'm saying. I think it's call Funk WanderLink.
>
> Anyone have info in this???
> Thanks
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Dilger)
Subject: Re: Importance of securing systems
Date: 14 Apr 1999 05:05:36 GMT
In article <7f0i1f$5jb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Meissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Since I got my cable modem and my machine is on the net 24/7 I see
>fairly active attempts to connect. Most times it's just a telnet,
>other times there will be corresponding hits on finger, popper,
>ftp, web, and several others. I generally keep 8 weeks worth of
>log files. In the last 8 weeks I had 80 attempts to telnet into
>my machine.
Actually, I try to avoid them even getting as far as being denied
by telnetd. I would rather have ipchains DENY the connection attempt
(this takes a few seconds/attempt). I basically have all incoming
traffic sent to the bit bucket. As an added measure, I still try
to keep the system as secure as possible (ie few login accounts, few
daemons running, etc), but two layers of defence are better than one.
However, from your logs, it doesn't look like serious attempts yet.
If someone is going at 3 or 4 ports from the same source address, I
would go after them... One connect attempt can be written off as
mistaken identity (eg their friend used to have that IP last week).
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger University of Calgary \"If a man ate a pound of pasta and
Micronet Research Group \ a pound of antipasto, would they
Dept of Electrical & Computer Engineering \ cancel out, leaving him still
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ hungry?" -- Dogbert
------------------------------
From: dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: really slow 100Mb ethernet
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 21:45:54 GMT
Hello, everybody. I'm having yet another problem with my network, and I hope
someone can give me some hint's here. The problem being: My lan is composed
of several win9x, NT, IRIX's and a Linux, acting as a fileserver (plus other
insignificant thingies). The setup is pure 100Mb, i.e. no switches. Now, the
transfer rates between any 2 machines on the lan, excluding the Linux box, is
in the range of 1-5 MB/sec, but all transfer to and from the Linux box is ca.
200-300 KB/sec. Now obviously this is connection where speed is most wanted,
being a file server 'n all. I've been monitoring this group for a few days
now, looking for hints, but to no avail. Here's the setup of my box, and what
I've done so far: Compaq prosignia 200, bunch of ram/disk space, RH 5.2
(kernel 2.0.36), eth0 is a integrated netelligent 10/100 (tlan.o version 1.0)
* Double checked/changed all hubs and cables to and from the patient. *
Made sure neither routed nor gated are running * Forced full duplex / 100 Mb
on the NIC (just in case) * Ping-ed across the network 'till I was blue in
the face; no packet loss (even with sizes up to 512 bytes), no duplicates,
ever! * Checked for shared/overlapping irq/io * Checked ad nauseum
broadcast addresses, routing tables, etc. etc. you just nslookup it, I've
done it :p
One thing which I don't understand (well, there are more then one, but who's
counting :) is the frame errors I'm seeing when I ifconfig the nic:
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:73162 errors:387 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:387
TX packets:60522 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:7962
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x6480
What do these mean? Is there cause for alarm? (Note, these numbers are after
ca. 4 hrs of very little activity)
So the what I'm praying, nay, _begging_ for is anything not mentioned here, to
get me started on something.
Has anyone of you had any experience with this type of nic in a 100Mb
environment?
Is there a way to detect where the lag is (bad driver, faulty hardware, kernel
to busy n' can't be bothered, whatever).
I'm on my knees here folk's and I'm begging for clues, and it's really
humiliating. Any thoughts, however remotely plausible, however far fetched,
however utterly silly or even irrelevant, please, please, oh please.........
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: Static NAT with Linux
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 16:15:25 -0700
In article <7f0gef$5p5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> Hello all.
>
> I'm not looking to do IP Masquerade, but rather do specific
Network Address Translationto certain hosts on my inside network. For
instance, the IP to the world would be 206.247.11.8, but it would really
be a static mapping to 192.178.10.1 (or some other non-routable IP
address). My question is: Are there any tools to make this happen?
Could you use IP Masquerade in a special way?
>
> Thanks
>
i would think that this would work (assuming eth0 is your external
interface):
ipfwadm -F masq -S 206.247.11.8 -D 192.178.10.1 -W eth0
there's also a utility called ipnatadm that you could look for
personally, i'd stick with ipfwadm
btw, it's ipchains for 2.2+ kernels
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3 com 3c905b TX network card problems...
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:18:50 -0700
I have also done the ftp install with the 905b tx. worked great
------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TrackDown IP Address
Date: 13 Apr 99 10:53:50 GMT
Hi,
I need help on trackdown or huntdown ip address. I having problem
finding pc's which violate ip usage[ I mean some user change ip add.
without permission]. The problem is how to know where is their pc
located. I can get thier MAC address and user traceroute
is userless. I have iptraf and netwatch but usage monitoring olny.
Please gave me some hints and help on this please. We do have records
of all ethernet address and ip address but somewhere not updated.. there
if an issue here. Please gave an alternative.
Thank You,
--
==========
Jayasuthan
[Internal Linux System]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://still.working.on
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Burke Martin)
Subject: SMB/95
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 03:25:43 GMT
Hello ive been tinkering around with my win95 box and my linux box for sometime now
and it always seems like im having 'quirky' little problems. Right now im having a
strange thing happen where
i can connect and ping with both through everything except when i try to connect
through my 'netbroke neighborhood' window. i usually use this cause my monitor for
linux isnt so much to be desired so i usually
look at files on ym win95 machine. Anyways when i try to connect i get a strange error
that i cant quite figure out. it looks like it identifies teh computer fine cause its
name is correct and everything but when i try and
connect i get this error:
//Mothra is not accessible
The computer or sharename could not be found. Make sure you typed it correctly and try
again.
so i tried setting up a new share(one for each machine) to no avail. Any suggestions
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Burke
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Burke Martin)
Subject: SMB/95
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 03:25:45 GMT
Hello ive been tinkering around with my win95 box and my linux box for sometime now
and it always seems like im having 'quirky' little problems. Right now im having a
strange thing happen where
i can connect and ping with both through everything except when i try to connect
through my 'netbroke neighborhood' window. i usually use this cause my monitor for
linux isnt so much to be desired so i usually
look at files on ym win95 machine. Anyways when i try to connect i get a strange error
that i cant quite figure out. it looks like it identifies teh computer fine cause its
name is correct and everything but when i try and
connect i get this error:
//Mothra is not accessible
The computer or sharename could not be found. Make sure you typed it correctly and try
again.
so i tried setting up a new share(one for each machine) to no avail. Any suggestions
would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Burke
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
