Linux-Networking Digest #861, Volume #10 Wed, 14 Apr 99 23:13:32 EDT
Contents:
Re: Linux minicom login problem (James Carlson)
Re: Help. Unable to browse HTTPS from IP Masq'ed workstations -- Problem Solved!
("Mike Ellis")
Samba Server ("Mark Fry")
rwhois client? ("Clifton T. Sharp Jr.")
Couple of quick questions ("Aaron Dershem")
Re: Linux minicom login problem ("Phillips")
IP Masquerade and Dial In ("Neal Zipper")
Re: Linux minicom login problem (Cory Phillips)
mgetty: modem comm loop - locks up my system (Zachary Buckner)
can't do ipfowarding ("Prygiel P.M.")
Re: Linux minicom login problem ("Phillips")
Re: Running 2 version of Apache simultaneously ("Robert E. Van Cleef")
Re: apache1.3.6 trouble (Jim Roberts)
Re: Playing BATTLE.NET and Age of Empires behind IP Masquerade ("Doug Giddens")
Re: Networking/Cable Modem (Richard Preston)
Re: how to use IP-adres in firewall script (razoon)
Re: Performance comparison of nt vs linux (Don Baccus)
Re: Routing and Forwarding with SuSE 5.2 (Johann)
Re: Telnet and FTP woes (UnixDBA)
Re: telnet for root (please help) (UnixDBA)
looking for comment on CODA
Re: Telnet/ftp to linux server: login incorrect (UnixDBA)
Re: Configuring Linux As Gateway to Internet: Help (Adam C. Emerson)
NEW !!! Get Paid To Surf The Net $$$ (lcs Mixmaster Remailer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: Linux minicom login problem
Date: 14 Apr 1999 15:47:46 -0400
Cory Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Using the Linux RedHat 5.2 minicom logging into my ISP, I get the
> username and password prompt, but they keep getting rejected when I type
> them in. My ISP is using PAP. They are not very much help (They are
> all NT guys). They can not tell me what command I need to send to their
> server to start ppp, but they have told me that I need to initiate it
> from the client side.
The answer, most likely, is no command at all. You just want to start
PPP right after getting CONNECT from your modem. The last line of
your chat script should look like:
CONNECT '\d\c'
> I'm able to log into my ISP from Win95 no problem. How does Win95 know
> what command to send my ISP to start ppp? There has got to be an easier
> way. I have read so many HOWTO's on this that I'm probably an expert by
> now. I'm just about ready to change to an ISP that doesn't use Windows
> NT.
Well, that might also be advisable.
--
James Carlson, Software Architect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IronBridge Networks / 55 Hayden Avenue 71.246W Vox: +1 781 372 8132
Lexington MA 02421-7996 / USA 42.423N Fax: +1 781 372 8090
"PPP Design and Debugging" --- http://people.ne.mediaone.net/carlson/ppp
------------------------------
From: "Mike Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help. Unable to browse HTTPS from IP Masq'ed workstations -- Problem
Solved!
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 15:01:57 -0700
Changing ppp0 MTU from 296 to 1500 cured it.
Many thanks to Jonas Storholm for solution.
Apparently there is a serious bug in 2.0.36 ip_masq
handling of IP Fragmentation. Special MTU values
should NOT be required [RFC 1191]
------------------------------
From: "Mark Fry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba Server
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 20:00:37 +0100
After using linux for a while on a standalone desktop, we are having great
difficulties configuring samba for our server. Can anybody point me to a
step by step web page.
Thankyou
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rwhois client?
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:57:16 -0500
Does anyone know of an rwhois client for linux? All I've been able to find
has been a FreeBSD client, and since my system is less than a week old I'm
not sure I'm ready to begin the arduous learning curve for porting apps
with this particular one.
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
| Cliff Sharp | Whatever it is that hits the fan, |
| WA9PDM | it will not be distributed evenly. |
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
------------------------------
From: "Aaron Dershem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Couple of quick questions
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:34:55 -0500
I downloaded a small program from AT&T called VNC. It's an X server that
has a client that can run on Windows (among other OSs) boxes and display the
X session - they also has a Java client. It's pretty cool (tested it on a
machine other than my home on). The problem I have is that I can't use it
on my Linux server at home! It uses TCP port 5900+ for its listening port.
When I try to connect, I can't. How do I check which ports I can make a
connection to? Also, which configuration file to I change to allow/disallow
TCP connections on specific ports?
Another, unrelated question: How do I change the default path for all
users? I use the set command to see the path, but I can't figure out how to
change it.
Thanks!
Aaron Derhsem
------------------------------
From: "Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux minicom login problem
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:21:36 GMT
I got RedHat 5.2 from the Linux Unleashed book and it tells you to add a
user to the /etc/passwd file in the following format for security reasons
(pg 408):
ppp:*:301:51:PPP account:/tmp:/etc/ppp/pppscript
the /etc/ppp/pppscript file contains:
#!/bin/sh
mesg n
stty -echo
exec pppd -detach silent modem crtscts
Now, is it possible that this is conflicting with my scripts for logging
onto my ISP?
Thanks,
Cory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cory Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Using the Linux RedHat 5.2 minicom logging into my ISP, I get the
> username and password prompt, but they keep getting rejected when I type
> them in. My ISP is using PAP. They are not very much help (They are
> all NT guys). They can not tell me what command I need to send to their
> server to start ppp, but they have told me that I need to initiate it
> from the client side.
> I'm able to log into my ISP from Win95 no problem. How does Win95 know
> what command to send my ISP to start ppp? There has got to be an easier
> way. I have read so many HOWTO's on this that I'm probably an expert by
> now. I'm just about ready to change to an ISP that doesn't use Windows
> NT.
>
> cory
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: "Neal Zipper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerade and Dial In
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:23:24 GMT
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
Can I use IP Masquerade and Dial in on the same modem under Lunix 2.2.
I have setup Dial In but I can't Dial out (Using KDE PPP) if it's
enabled. Will I have the same problem with IP Masquerade???
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0.2
iQA/AwUBNxU/kOBzTWGL4akyEQIVCgCg67v5vnecwncahE817T5sgiY+50MAoMeP
SY03dNHsfrRNvd0qSzO8tCsQ
=3+7b
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: Cory Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: Linux minicom login problem
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 15:37:16 -0500
I do have the CONNECT '\d\c' in my ppp-on-dialer script, but it doesn't
seem to make a difference. By the way, what does '\d' mean anyway?
Thanks for all the help,
Cory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Zachary Buckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mgetty: modem comm loop - locks up my system
Date: 14 Apr 1999 20:58:43 GMT
Here are a few more clues. I simulated the problem by dialing in from
another computer. mgetty answers, and I can stay logged in
indefinitely. Whenever I exit (via logout or hangup), the server
freezes. As I said earlier, it's not actually locked up, it's too busy
to respond to anything. The modem's SEND and RECEIVE lights stay on, but
unfortunately I have no way of knowing what's being transfered.
The logs occassionally pick up some of the garbage (like when checking
the line, an hour later) and it will read huge series's of [0a][0a][0a]...
[0a] being ASCII 10... linefeed?
It just doesn't make sense to me. One last clue. When I drop the
connection by hanging up the remote computer, the local, frozen computer
still thinks I'm logged in. So maybe it's my shell that's causing all of
these problems?
If I understand correctly: mgetty answers the phone, transfers control to
/bin/login, which then transfers control to bash?
Again, any help will be greatly appreciated. -Zach
--
^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._
Zach Buckner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^
------------------------------
From: "Prygiel P.M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: can't do ipfowarding
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 18:36:36 +0200
Hello,
i try to do routing with linux and two ethernet cards
but there is no way to enable fowarding, i have these messages :
eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe800, 00:10:5a:bd:38:e7, IRQ 11
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split,
autoselect/NWay Autonegotiation interface.
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: Enabling bus-master transmits and
whole-frame receives.
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: 3c59x.c:v0.99E 5/12/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: smc-ultra.c:v2.02 2/3/98 Donald Becker
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: eth1: SMC Ultra at 0x380, 00 00 C0 AC
62 6F, IRQ 10 memory 0xce000-0xd1fff.
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: sysctl: ip forwarding off
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: eth1: unexpected TX-done interrupt,
lasttx=0.
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: Partition check:
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: hda: hda1 hda2 hda3 hda4
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: hdc: [PTBL] [526/32/63] hdc1
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
readonly.
Apr 14 18:17:38 info-pmp kernel: Adding Swap: 36284k swap-space
(priority -1)
Apr 14 18:17:39 info-pmp named[317]: Forwarding source address is
[0.0.0.0].1025
Apr 14 18:17:39 info-pmp named[318]: Ready to answer queries.
Apr 14 18:17:39 info-pmp named[318]: sysquery:
sendto([192.203.230.10].53): Network is unreachable
any idea please ?
Thanks
Prygiel P.M.
------------------------------
From: "Phillips" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux minicom login problem
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:32:30 GMT
>From what I've read about the PPP HOWTO's on the web, it seems we have two
situations.
An ISP uses PAP/CHAP or they don't.
The HOWTO's state that if they do use PAP/CHAP then you will not receive a
login and password prompt and if they don't use PAP/CHAP you will get the
prompts.
This is not my situation. My ISP is using PAP and I also receive the user
prompts. However, if I use minicom to try and login my ISP will not
recognize my ID and password.
cory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Robert E. Van Cleef" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.rpm,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Running 2 version of Apache simultaneously
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 03:58:34 +0000
S P Arif Sahari Wibowo wrote:
>
>
> Actually I would like to install it from an rpm distribution, for it will
> be easily manageable. Apparently it is not possible, right?
>
I don't know the syntax off-hand, but you can give an argument to
RPM telling it to place the files somewhere else. Check the RPM
documentation.
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Bob Van Cleef, Member of Technical Staff (408) 734-8100
MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc. FAX (408) 734-8136
475 Potrero Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: apache1.3.6 trouble
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 00:59:01 GMT
:
> Hello,
> I tried to install a binary version of apache_1.3.6-i686-whatever-linux2.
> After running the install script (install-bindist.sh) I would like to run
> the server with ./bin/apachectl start but an error occured:
> error in loading shared libraries:libdb.so.2
> The server could not be started.
> I can�t find the libdb.so.2. Can anybody help me?
> (I use the Suse 5.3 distribution)
> Thanks a lot
>
> regards
> Sebastian
Sebastian;
This points out the problem trying to run pre-compiled binaries. The
apache binary was compiled and linked againest libdb.so.2 which you
do not have on you system. I'm pretty sure it is on the distribution
cdrom.
You have two choices; install the library needed or compile apache
from source.
--
Jim Roberts Never enough time!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Doug Giddens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Playing BATTLE.NET and Age of Empires behind IP Masquerade
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 16:41:12 -0500
try
http://users.nais.com/~nevo/masq/
--
Witty signature awaitng software upgrade
Eugene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:%bBQ2.900$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> do *NOT* post to newsgroups in HTML format since many news readers cannot
> read it.
> *NEVER* put stupid pictures in the background of your messages.
>
>
> --
> "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
> "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
>
>
>
> Robert Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:Q5zQ2.7063$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am successfully using IP Masquerading from Win'98 PC through my Linux
> server... however, I cannot seem to use multi-player games such as Diablo
II
> on Battle.net or Microsoft Age of Empires. I heard of similar problems
like
> this that occur when programs use UDP on a specific TCP port.
>
> Question: How would I configure such a policy to allow UDP packets out a
> specific port #? Is there a way I can "sniff-out" a program's use of a
port
> #? Has anyone done this before with the above-mentioned games?
>
> Help!!
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Preston)
Crossposted-To: comp.dcom.modems.cable,sdnet.cablemodems
Subject: Re: Networking/Cable Modem
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 21:39:04 GMT
First an answer, then a question of my own.
Yes Steven, that's how it works. Your cable provider will give you extra IP
addresses at an extra charge. You can get a small hub to connect all the
computers and the modem to. If you want to get fancy, you can put two ethernet
cards into one of your computers and use it as a proxy server.
It's been my experience that your cable co. will probably give you an ethernet
card if you need one and set the cable modem up for you on one of your
computers. Then you can just do the same for the rest of your computers.
Now here's a question of my own:
I'm trying to connect to a cable modem using Linux too, but it's not working.
I've been told it may be because the gateway address ends in 24 which is 11000
in binary. I've been told that 000 is a reserved bit mask or whatever in Unix
and that may be the problem.
Does that sound like the problem and is there any work around?
Thanks,
Richard Preston
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 00:40:02 -0500, "Steven D. Nakhla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am interested in getting a cable modem internet connection through the
>local cable provider here in Baltimore, Comcast. However, there is more
>than one computer in the house, and if we want all of them to be wired to
>the cable modem, we need to setup a network. Here is my question: What all
>is involved in that? I'm a computer science major, so I've got a pretty
>decent understanding of the concpets, and all, but I've never setup a
>network. Here is what I *think* is involved, please tell me if I'm right
>or way off:
>
>We buy a hub which hooks into the cable modem. The modem acts sort of as a
>"server", to which each of the computers is connected as clients. Network
>cards (ethernet I believe) run into the hub connecting each of the
>computers.
>
>Is this right? Has anyone had experience with this type of connection who
>could lend me a hand with it? Instructions? Hardware/Software
>reccomendations? Any help you can give would be REALLY appreciated!
>
>Also, I'm running Windows 98, Linux, and Solaris on my computer. Can I use
>the cable modem connection with Linux and Solaris?
>
>please reply to:
>Steve Nakhla
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (razoon)
Subject: Re: how to use IP-adres in firewall script
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 21:27:59 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999 13:04:20 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca
Filipozzi) wrote:
>[This followup was posted to comp.os.linux.networking and a copy was sent
>to the cited author.]
>
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>says...
>> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >says...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >says...
>> >> >> I want to run a firewallscript from commandline.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> IPADDR=`/sbin/ifconfig ipp p0 | /bin/grep 'inet addr' | /usr/bin/cut
>> >> >> -f >2 -d: | /usr/bin/cut -f 1 -d' '`
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ipchains -A input -p udp -j DENY -d $IPADDR 137:139 gives an error.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> How can i generate my ip-addres?
>> >> >> What is the right syntax?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >don't you need to export IPADDR to the environment.
>> >> >
>> >> >setenv IPADDR yadayada for csh or tcsh
>> >> >export IPADDR=yadayada for sh, ksh, or bash
>> >>
>> >> Can you please be more specific.
>> >> I am just a newbie, sorry
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >In a shell script, you can do the following assign to a variable (IPADDR)
>> >and use it anywhere in the script as $IPADDR. This works in a shell
>> >script because it has its own environment (inherited from the login shell
>> >from which it was called, but definitely its own). When the shell
>> >completes and you are returned to your login shell (the prompt), IPADDR
>> >will no longer be valid.
>> >
>> >Similarly, if at the command prompt you simply type IPADDR=something,
>> >IPADDR will not be valid after you press enter because a simple
>> >assignment does not add IPADDR to the environment. If you want IPADDR to
>> >remain valid in the login shell, you must "export" it to the environment.
>> >How you export depends on which login shell you use.
>> >
>> >setenv is used with csh or tcsh
>> >export is used with sh, ksh, or bash
>> >
>> >You need to buy a good book on shell programming and using shells. I'm
>> >sure O'Reilly has a good selection.
>> >
>> >#!/bin/sh
>> >IPADD
>>
>> Okay i understand, but one more question.
>> When i do:
>> /sbin/ifconfig ipp p0 | /bin/grep 'inet addr' | /usr/bin/cut
>> -f >2 -d: | /usr/bin/cut -f 1 -d' '
>> from the prompt i get the ipadres indeed. So the syntax is good.
>>
>> But when i put it in a script like:
>> export IPADDR=/sbin/ifconfig ipp p0 | /bin/grep 'inet addr' |
>> /usr/bin/cut -f >2 -d: | /usr/bin/cut -f 1 -d' '
>> echo $IPADDR
>>
>> Then i get the whole string back instead of the ipaddres.
>> So what is in IPADDR when the script executes?
>> The string or the ipaddres?
>It contains the string.
>
>Try this:
>
>export IPADDR=`stuff`
>
>surround the stuff you have above in back-ticks.
>
>This tells the shell to execute the stuff inside the quotes and to
>assigne the result (the ip address) to the variable.
Then i get the message: /usr/bin/cut: the deliminiter must be a single
charachter.
The last cut contains 1 space(" ").
But it is a single char ! Im stumped.
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Performance comparison of nt vs linux
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Baccus)
Date: 14 Apr 1999 14:31:05 PST
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
William Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Has anyone seen this, and are there any comments. ? (my comments are
>included below)
>Seems like the MS marketing machine has gone into action against linux.
>
>Mindcraft, Inc. conducted the performance tests described in this report
>between March 10 and March 13, 1999.
> Microsoft Corporation sponsored the testing reported
>herein.
>http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/nts4rhlinux.html
The test system included 4 GB RAM. Does NT effectively use
RAM over 2 GB? If so, that could account for a great deal
of the difference under very heavy load.
>What is really noticable from this report, is there are no
>price/performance charts here.
I can justify Linux for my personal server. I can't justify
the price of an NT server licence, and I don't have anywhere
near enough memory to run up against Linux restrictions on
the use of RAM.
>3700 requests per second is probably the level of activity you would see
>in a 10,000 user intranet web server.
This gives you some notion of the inherent capacity of their
four-headed Xeon box!
If someone would give me one, I might even cave in and run
NT on it! :)
(only if they gave me one, believe me)
--
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nature photos, on-line guides, at http://donb.photo.net
------------------------------
From: Johann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing and Forwarding with SuSE 5.2
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 21:01:16 +0200
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
Hi !
<P>A firewall is not automaticaly a gateway.
<BR>All you need, to configure a gateway, is correctly arange the routing.
Therefore edit the file /etc/route.conf
<BR>There <B>must </B>be declared routes for both interfaces eth0 and eth1.
Also add the right default route.
<BR>In your case i would configure route.conf as following:
<P>#Destination
Gateway
Netmask
Device
<BR>#------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<BR>#lopback
<BR>127.0.0.0
0.0.0.0
255.255.255.0 lo
<BR>#route to the LAN
<BR>134.133.122.0
0.0.0.0
255.255.255.0 eth1
<BR>#route to the internet
<BR>134.133.125.254
0.0.0.0
255.255.255.255 eth0
<BR>defaultroute
134.133.125.254
<P>#end of route.config
<BR>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<P>The gateway address for the workstations in the LAN is the address of
the eth1 interface (134.133.122.1)
<P>The workstations in the LAN are not registered to use internet ( they
have not their own registered IP addresses ). If you want to use internet
from them, you also have to activate IP-Masquerading.
<BR>
<BR>
<BR> </HTML>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UnixDBA)
Subject: Re: Telnet and FTP woes
Date: 15 Apr 1999 02:32:50 GMT
How does one configure the system (RedHat 5.2) to allow the root user to
telnet? Please email replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UnixDBA)
Subject: Re: telnet for root (please help)
Date: 15 Apr 1999 02:40:17 GMT
Could someone mercifully provide the syntax for editing /etc/securetty to
enable telnet by root? Please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers!
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: looking for comment on CODA
Date: 14 Apr 1999 21:44:57 GMT
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hi all
anybody using CODA?
How stable is (+-5 clients)?
How stable is the Win95 Client?
I think it does already support encryption, isn't it?
please CC: your reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance,
Ulisses
Debian/GNU Linux: a dream come true
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: latin1
Comment: PGP public key available at http://www.rediris.es/cert/keyserver
iQB1AwUBNxUMVw/N+5+NQ63pAQHYRAMAknH1ri4b5DuWivOA2SiYeF+qvZL02UlS
4JxrYd896SpXi3yeS0pTUDe2x489QhCZC/+J0NwhZO8N59oYOuGbNm+ieD+KVCfX
1msEDnaJKrOLRbrsjDifELhQLcynUqbi
=wU9W
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UnixDBA)
Subject: Re: Telnet/ftp to linux server: login incorrect
Date: 15 Apr 1999 02:50:21 GMT
Would someone mercifully explain how to allow telnet as root to my Linux box?
Please email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers!
------------------------------
From: Adam C. Emerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Configuring Linux As Gateway to Internet: Help
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:20:25 GMT
[ Newsgroups and Follup-To trimmed ]
In comp.os.linux.networking pcheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ Reformatted for width ]
> No, they don't have real Inet addresses (it's a B network with
> non-Internet addresses: 172.16.2.1 .2 and .3).
If they don't have real internet addresses, then you have to
set up masquerading. Your NT machines' packets can go out, but
nothing can go back to them, that's why nothing's working.
Masquerading will make your Linux box (which gets a real IP from
the PPP connection) mark the forwarded packets and give them its
own IP address. Then when the replies come back, it can give
them to the appropriate server. You won't get a nice simple internet
connection working unless you enable IP masquerading.
--
Adam C. Emerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.calvin.edu/~aemers19/
Movesource Network Systems Specialist
"Cogito ergo I'm right and you're wrong." -- Blair P. Houghton
------------------------------
Date: 15 Apr 1999 02:40:07 -0000
From: lcs Mixmaster Remailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NEW !!! Get Paid To Surf The Net $$$
Fellow Surfers.....
If you could get paid to do nothing more than
surf the net, Would you do it? Of course you would!
AllAdvantage is the Company that pays its members while they
surf the Web ($.50 an hour). It's free to join and it takes about a
minute (no survey to fill out).
Now you can get paid to do something you already like
to do. Now that's a concept! Now you can be paid to
do just that.
***********************************************************
Goto: http://alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=APP734
************************************************************
This program is:
-FREE to join
-Nothing to buy
-Easy to do
-Hassle Free
Plus you get:
-.50 cents for every hour you're online up to
40 hours per month.
***************************************************************************
Check out the site: http://alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=APP734
****************************************************************************
Everyone's going to sign up eventually, there's no doubt
about that, they would be stupid not to. They get paid
just for doing something they're already doing.
PLUS: You get paid ..
-.10 cents for every hour people you refer
are on line.
-.05 cents for every hour the people they
refer up to 4 levels.
*************************************************************
Goto: http://alladvantage.com/go.asp?refid=APP734
************************************************* ***********
Thanks for listening,
Heather Downing
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
