Linux-Networking Digest #861, Volume #11 Sun, 11 Jul 99 15:13:49 EDT
Contents:
Machine disappears till ping? (John Coppens)
Ping not getting back through router (Graham Harris)
SOCK_PACKET (Bayee)
Re: Help with ftp server config - 550: Permission Denied (Upload Dirs) (Essence)
Re: Finding kppp (Chris Harshman)
Please Help me install drivers for FastEthernet card (Ian Moltke)
Re: firewall questions (Doug)
Re: /etc/ppp/peers/... permission denied (?) (Clifford Kite)
�@���ȿ����n�� ("Chen TH")
Re: Please Help me install drivers for FastEthernet card (Jim Roberts)
xisp error messages -help ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux can not see more than one NIC card in one PC?? ("Jesse")
Re: NFS problems in Redhat Linux 6 ("Damon J. Rygiewicz")
RH SECURE WEB SERVER 2.0 + RH 6.0 PROBLEMS (Dwayne Croteau)
Re: ppp-go for root only? (Clifford Kite)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Coppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Machine disappears till ping?
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 11:46:14 -0300
Hi...
Strange problem: our web server, www.uccor.edu.ar, at times disappears
and cannot be reached from the outside (not by www.uccor.edu.ar nor
by its IP, not by httpd nor other means).
When I connect to another machine on the net there, and do a ping from
this machine to the webserver, everything wakes up, and the webserver
is suddenly visible again.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
John
------------------------------
From: {$graham$}@microphoneDOT.prestel.co.uk (Graham Harris)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Ping not getting back through router
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 15:56:15 GMT
Gents,
I have been sweating to configure Redhat 5.0 as a router between my
office lan (10.0.2.0 on 10base2) and my isdn pbx (192.168.42.1 on
10baseT).
Redhat now has 2 lan cards up and running, and is (I think) configured
for routing.
When I try and ping the pbx from Redhat it responds immediately, and a
status light on the pbx blinks to indicate lan traffic.
when I try and ping Redhat from the office LAN I can get a response
from either (both) of the LAN cards: ne1000 on 10.0.2.100 and ne2000
clone on 192.168.42.100
When I try to ping the pbx from the office LAN I get no response; but
the pbx status light blinks to show traffic.
I guess the ping is getting past Redhat on the way to the pbx, but the
response is being lost in Redhat on the way back.
Anyone have any ideas where to look please?
--
Graham Harris
Equinus- Today's Business & Technology Consultancy for the Travel industry
http://www.equinus.com
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 00:11:06 +0800
From: Bayee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: SOCK_PACKET
Hi all,
I am currently doing a project that need to convert tcp frame into
some propiatry network
and vice versa, like this,
Other Host <---- TCP/IP -----> (eth0) Linux Gateway
(ppp0/eth1) <----- >Propairty Network
Can I bind SOCK_PACKET to eth0 to read/write IP packet ?
Regards,
Bayee
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Essence)
Subject: Re: Help with ftp server config - 550: Permission Denied (Upload Dirs)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 16:30:58 GMT
After some tinkering I was able to get users to upload to incoming as
well as being able to create directories, and uploading in those
directories.
I used the following entries to do this
upload /home/ftp /incoming yes root ftpers 0777 dirs
upload /home/ftp /incoming/* yes root ftpers 0777 dirs
The only problem now is how to prevent users from uploading to the
root of /incoming. I want to force users to create directories and
upload to those directories.
I tried
upload /home/ftp /incoming no
upload /home/ftp /incoming/* yes root ftpers 0777 dirs
It doesn't allow me to upload to incoming, but it also doesn't allow
me to create dirs in /incoming :(
Any ideas?
------------------------------
From: Chris Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Finding kppp
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 11:21:07 -0500
If it isn't installed yet, you'll need to install
the KDENetwork package.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 'locate kppp', or if you haven't setup locate, use 'find'.
> -ckm
--
chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------
"If there is hope," I said, quoting Orwell, "it lies in the proles."
The Billionaire pressed his fingertips together, considering. "Nah,"
he said, finally, and flipped The Switch.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Moltke)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Please Help me install drivers for FastEthernet card
Date: 11 Jul 1999 17:06:06 GMT
Im installing RH 5.0.The drivers for my FastEthernet Card I found on
the web of the manufacturer(VIA-Taiwan).I followed the instructions:
gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c fet3043.c
cp ./fet3043.o /usr/src/linux/modules/fet3043.o
It cant do the copy because /usr/scr/linux doesnt exist in RH.
So where should I copy fet3043.o?
Would really appreciate any help.
Ian Moltke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: firewall questions
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:45:30 GMT
You want the app IPMASQADM for IPCHAINS. I just got it up today to
open some ports up on a machine behind my ipchains firewall.
Here is a link to the IP masqurading resource page:
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/
Here is a link to a modified masq howto with an example pretty much
describing exactly what u want:
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.65.html
Here is the section of that howto giving an example how to pass thru the
firewall to a webserver with an internal 192.168 IP address:
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.65-6.html#ss6.8
Hope this helps
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: /etc/ppp/peers/... permission denied (?)
Date: 11 Jul 1999 11:18:11 -0500
Michael Steffens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: My question is: How can pppd, despite its suid bit
: being set, have difficulties in reading the provider
: specific options file? How can this be fixed?
I don't have a good answer to this question but if you're just dialing
up an ISP then you don't need the auth or the noauth option. It's very
unlikely that the ISP is configured to authenticate itself to it's
clients.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* To extract lines: View file with "vi -R". Move cursor to first line.
Press "v". Move cursor to mark lines (Esc unmarks). Write lines to
fubar with ":w fubar <Enter>". Exit with ":q <Enter>". */
------------------------------
From: "Chen TH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x,tw.bbs.comp.hacker,tw.bbs.comp.hardware,tw.bbs.comp.linux,tw.bbs.comp.www,tw.bbs.rec.beautysalon,tw.bbs.rec.pcgame,tw.bbs.rec.pcgame.foreign
Subject: �@���ȿ����n��
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:01:57 +0800
�Q�W�[���J!!�ոյL�k!!
GoToWorld ���ѤF�@�ӫܦn���s���u��BROWSER
�K�O�����|����A���A�γo��BROWSER���ɭԡA�A�C�p�ɥ��b�Ȩ�$0.4�����s�i�O!
���е��B�ͫ�A�B�ͥΪ��ɭԧA�S�������A�B�ͪ��B�ͥήɧA���������A
�{�b�g�٤��n�A���ɮa�x���J���n���A���ѥߨ�ѥ[�a�C
�p�ЪB�ͥ[�J�S��²�檺��k�N�O�A�b�n�O��send email���A���B�͡A���ХL�̥[
�J�A�䦸�O�έӤH�����ŶǡA�O�o�bemail�έӤH�������[�J�U�C���}:
http://www.gotoworld.com/getpaid/register/default.asp?rid=1012549680
�u�O�L���ͧQ���n��k!������N�h�ݬݧa!
======================
Chen TH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From Taipei's Man
======================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: Please Help me install drivers for FastEthernet card
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:23:22 GMT
In article <7maitu$je5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Moltke) writes:
> Im installing RH 5.0.The drivers for my FastEthernet Card I found on
> the web of the manufacturer(VIA-Taiwan).I followed the instructions:
> gcc -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O6 -c fet3043.c
> cp ./fet3043.o /usr/src/linux/modules/fet3043.o
> It cant do the copy because /usr/scr/linux doesnt exist in RH.
> So where should I copy fet3043.o?
>
> Would really appreciate any help.
>
> Ian Moltke
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The simple answer is to install the Kernel Source.
Jim
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xisp error messages -help
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:31:13 GMT
I'm running redhat 5.1 and I have installed x-isp to connect to the
internet. But xisp dials and disconnects after a minute.
I have the following error messages diposited at /var/log/messages:
"pppd 2.3.3 started by root, uid 0
serial connection established
Using interface ppp 0
LCP: timeout sending config-reques
connection terminated
Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean
problem : all had bit 7 set to 0
Hangup <SIGHUP>
EXIT "
please help. I don't know what is going on.
Mohamed Yusuf
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux can not see more than one NIC card in one PC??
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 10:58:55 -0700
Mark,
You seem to have part of my problem fixed. But if anyone can help it would
be greatly appreciated. No I'm not a linux guru (obviously) by any means.
I'm fairly new to it. But I have a Dell 486 with an ISA PnP NE2000 card
(two in fact) and I can get neither of them to work in Linux. I've been
reading out of a few books I have and I tried setting up everything I think
I needed too in Linux to get the Card working. But I am having no luck and
I'm sure I'm leaving something out.
I've tried using several different programs within Xwindows. Linuxconf,
netconf, Network Configurator(which looks basically the same as netconf).
I have a ADSL connection coming into my hub, and all my boxes going into the
hub with the gateway and DNS servers setup giving them all Internet access.
I'm trying to get Linux set up as a Web Server using Apache most likely.
but I need to get the NIC working! I have a Static IP which I assigned to
it.
But I set up the interface as eth0, with it's static IP, and I set it to
active but it allways goes back to inactive for some reason.
Plus there is a lo interface already in there that I can't remove which is
active.
Anyhow when I reboot it says Delaying initialization of eth0.
I don't know what to do! I don't know how Drivers work with Linux, so I
assume I'm not setting up drivers some how! I have Redhat 5.2 but I just DL
6.0 and plan on installing it. but I would like to figure out how to set up
the NIC after the OS is installed. Even though I've been told its a lot
easier to get hardware working if you do it at OS install time.
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Jman -
James Saville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:k0Uh3.7883$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Go and get the latest tulip driver code. This fixed the problem for me.
> Cheers...
>
> Here is my post about this attached:
>
> I also saw this problem and it was a bear to diagnose and fix. My
symptoms
> were that the card was visible and initialized properly, but unresponsive.
> I could not ping or send/recieve traffic. According to the
configuration -
> everything was set up properly and should have worked, but didn't.
>
> Running RH6.0 P100.
>
> The card I am using that used to tulip driver is a Linksys Etherfast
10/100
> PCI Model #LNE100TX. I purchased this card at CompUSA, so I assume there
> are quite a few out there. I hope this helps all that run into this
> problem.
>
> Here is how I fixed:
>
> Go to
http://www.linksys.com/support/solution/nos/linux%5Flne100tx.htm#tulip
> This has good instructions on how to compile the new driver.
>
> The driver can be had from a link on this page or by going to
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
> Note that the driver is used on all cards with this chipset, so even if
your
> card is not from Linksys, it will use the same driver. Getting the latest
> version might fix the problem, as it did in my case.
>
> I am currently working with the tulip.c:v0.91 4/14/99 version. As soon as
I
> had recomplied this driver and put it in place, everything started working
> beautifully.
>
> Thanks to Donald Becker for his excellent site loaded with more info than
I
> ever wanted to know about this stuff. Site has excellent technical info
> about ethernet in general and all the code for this driver. Wow!!!
>
>
> James Saville
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> KEYWORDS: Linksys, 10/100, tulip, ethernet, device driver, network, DEC,
> Becker
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7ls96k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > this is red hat 6.0 (kernel 2.2).
> >
> > I am unable to make Linux see more than one NIC card.
> >
> > I added a second NIC to my PC, but now I am having a hard time
> > telling Linux to use it. It seems it want to only use ONE NIC
> > card.
> >
> > When I added a second NIC (NE2000 card), and rebooted, I find
> > that eth0 now is the new NIC card I added, and Linux did not
> > see the first card I had. I was expecting to see eth0 and eth1,
> > since I have 2 NIC cards. one device per NIC card.
> >
> > Now, this is the output of dmesg showing that Linux saw the
> > new Card I added but did not see the other one:
> >
> > >>>>>
> > : ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > : NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x280: 00 40 33 e0 95 af
> > : eth0: NE2000 found at 0x280, using IRQ 5.
> > >>>>>>
> >
> > Before I added the above NIC card, this is the dmseg output, showing
> > the other NIC card I have in the PC :
> >
> > >>>
> > : tulip.c:v0.89H 5/23/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > : eth0: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC at 0x1400, c0 00 2c f0 1a 73, IRQ 11.
> > : eth0: MII transceiver found at MDIO address 1, config 3100 status
7829.
> > >>>>
> >
> >
> > So, now When I do
> >
> > ifconfig eth1 <some IP address>
> >
> > Linux tells me that no such device exist.
> >
> > My first NIC card was a PCI card, this second card I added (NE2000)
> > is an ISA card.
> >
> > I looked at Linux configuration (make xconfig) and did not see some
> > option to allow more than one network interface to exist. (do I need
> > to do something special to create eth1 device?) why did Linux not
> > see the second NIC card now?
> >
> > any help will be appreciated.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Mark
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Damon J. Rygiewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.nfs,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: NFS problems in Redhat Linux 6
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 13:29:01 -0500
mike wrote in message ...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>OK, I'm at my wit's end. I've been trying to get nfs working on Redhat
>>6.0 for a
>>couple of weeks now and I'm getting ever more angry/confused.
>>I basically have 2 machines, both redhat 6. As far as I can tell, all of
>>the
>>relevant files are set up properly (they're included below) and all
>>machines
>>have been rebooted.
>>
>>When I start up nfs I get the following errors in /var/log/messages:
>>
>>exportfs: joriki.maru.org.uk:/: Function not implemented
>>rpc.nfsd: nfssvc: Function not implemented
>
>do rpcinfo -p and see if NFS daemon is started, if not, start it as root
>>
>>and when I attempt to mount a drive I get the following:
>>
>>mountd[1130]: refused mount request from joriki.maru.org.uk: no export
>>entry in var/log/messages and
>>mount: hara:/ failed, reason given by server: Permission denied
>
>>Can anybody point me in the right direction
>>
>>TIA
>>
>>Pat.
>>
>>/etc/hosts
>>192.168.1.1 hara.maru.org.uk hara
>>192.168.1.2 joriki.maru.org.uk joriki
>>
>>/etc/hosts.allow (joriki - hara has joriki.maru.org.uk instead)
>>ALL: hara.maru.org.uk
>>
>>/etc/hosts.deny
>>ALL: ALL
>>
>>/etc/exports (joriki - hara has joriki(rw) instead)
>>/ hara(rw)
This entry would be better off:
/ hara.maru.org.uk(rw)
>
>wouldn't the entry be something like
>/ rw=hara
>
>do a showmount -e Linux_hostname-which-is-exporting
------------------------------
From: Dwayne Croteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH SECURE WEB SERVER 2.0 + RH 6.0 PROBLEMS
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 1999 17:55:40 GMT
Hi,
I have a problem with RH 6.0 and RH SECURE WEB SERVER 2.0.
I am setting up a secure web server on a machine hosting multiple name
based virtual domains. I had this configuration with no ssl working
with no problems. I installed all the updates for RH 6.0 according to
the information on RH's page about the secure web server. I then
proceeded to install the secure web server off the cd. It didn't
succeed because it found newer versions of the programs and libraries it
is dependant on. So I proceeded to install it with rpm from the command
line. The installation was successful. When I restarted apache, it
failed and gave me an error message (forgive me please for not writing
it down) something to the effect that "mod_ssl.c was an invalid
module". So I uninstalled it to restore it to its original
configuration before I installed the secure web server. I had to
reinstall apache from the RH 6.0 cd. Once I did this, it ran the
default configuration with no problem. I configured my name based
virtual domains, and when I restarted apache, it failed with no error
message. I checked it's status by typing "httpd status -S" and it told
me this "httpd dead but subsys locked" I removed the name based virtual
domains and it started successfully. Now when I try to browse the web
with netscape, it does not connect to any websites internal or abroad.
I can not ping this machine, nor can I telnet into it. Its networking
system is completely screwed. I could really use some insight into this
from someone who know's what this is all about.
Thanks,
Dwayne Croteau
=============================
Prolinux Corporate Consulting
(403)293-2382
www.prolinux.to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=============================
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp-go for root only?
Date: 11 Jul 1999 13:20:31 -0500
Go World Inc. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I'm setting up ppp access for office email (about time, Win95 has been
: blowing up too frequently and too thoroughly to be of any further use to
: us). A problem: the ppp-go command works for root, but not for users.
: I've fiddled with chmod, but apparently not well enough. What would I
: need to do -- and to which files -- in order to get our users to type
: 'ppp-go' from the command prompt and get the modem up and running the way
: it automatically does when I log on as root? And, by the way, I need to
: solve this for 'ppp-off' as well.
: I'm running Linux 2.0.35, installed with Slackware 3.6, using a CHAP
: script to connect to AT&T Worldnet service. The ppp-go script was
: generated automatically by running pppsetup and providing the information
: requested. If you need to know more details than this, let me know.
In the absence of restrictive pppd options you should only need to set
pppd suid, locate the ppp-go script where regular users can execute it,
and make sure that the chat command is specified with the full path:
/usr/sbin/chat . Depending on the specifics you may need to specify your
ISP username with "user <username>" rather than with "name <username>?
If this fails then we'll need to see the ppp-on script and any ancillary
scripts it may call as well as the /etc/ppp/options file if it has any
options in it.
The ppp-off script should work for whichever user launched pppd, at
least it works that way here. You'll also likely want to locate it
where a regular user can execute it.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
