Linux-Networking Digest #886, Volume #10 Fri, 16 Apr 99 20:13:46 EDT
Contents:
Re: lost eth0 dependency information ("Chris Cantwell")
Re: Help with broken PPP? (Jerry Quinn)
Default gateway in route table (Cindy La Vigne)
Re: Routing problems ? (Radovan Brako)
Re: How do I find out why my IP aliases don't work (Jure Simsic)
Re: Help with broken PPP? (Bill Unruh)
Re: Can't See Samba Server on network (Alexander Mattausch)
No ppp0 shown by ifconfig ? (Cris Cris)
pppd 2.3.7 demand dial HELP!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
How to do secure X11: NT Workstation SP4 (SecureCRT v2.4, Exceed v6.1), Redhat Linux
5.9.7 [Starbuck]: SSHD v1.2.26 ("tester")
Re: Linux/Apache Guru Needed ($$) Update ("Gero H. Marten")
Squid for linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux IP Masquerade and ADSL (PLEASE HELP!!) mattsearch (Duane Stiffarm)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Chris Cantwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: lost eth0 dependency information
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 12:18:27 -0400
Did you follow the instructions for recompiling the kernel in the HOWTO?
make menuconfig
make dep
make clean
make zImage (or make bzImage)
make install (or copy the kernel manually to /boot)
make install_module
edit lilo configuration /etc/lilo.conf
/sbin/lilo
Note: enable the "Development and experimental drivers" option in
menuconfig, or you will not be able to see the option for the EtherExpress
Pro network card. This driver (eepro) is still considered as under
development.
The eepro driver has been updated for the 2.2 kernel, and it worked fine for
me under both 2.0.36 and 2.2.4 (I have a RH5.2/kernel 2.2.4 box with two
eepro's working as a firewall)
BTW, it's always a good idea to make a backup copy of yout old kernel _and_
the kernel modules directory (/lib/modules/2.0.36 in your case). Setup lilo
to boot either the new kernel or the old kernel.
Chris Cantwell
Christophe NETILLARD wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>
>After recompiling my kernel (with RH5.2 distrib, kernel 2.0.36-0.7),
>my ethernet card (that was perfectly driven with Ethernet Express Pro
>-eepro-
>module on that kernel) was not driven anymore.
>
>A boot message shows a problem of dependency annonced by modprobe.
>And i get this :
>
>[root@astlinux /root]# modprobe eth0
>no dependency information for module: "/lib/modules/2.0.36/net/eepro.o"
>
>Even after many other compilation with different options, the problem
>remains.
>Any experience or idea on that among you all ?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Christophe & Gilles
>
>email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with broken PPP?
Date: 16 Apr 1999 12:13:00 -0400
Clifford> Jerry Quinn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Clifford> : >> "Jerry" == Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Clifford>
Clifford> : Jerry> My 2.2.1 system (Powercenter 120) was happily doing SecureID CHAP
ppp
Clifford> : Jerry> logins until last weekend. Something changed and now I can't get a
Clifford> : Jerry> login started at all. I've been through the FAQ, ppp README, and
Clifford> : Jerry> Network admin guide and can't figure out what's wrong.
Clifford>
Clifford> : Jerry> My ppp startup script is an expect script that handles the terminal
Clifford> : Jerry> interaction and then invokes pppd. During the expect script,
Clifford> : Jerry> everything goes fine -- I enter my userid and secure card number
and
Clifford> : Jerry> it gets verified and pppd is started. Then it appears that pppd
just
Clifford> : Jerry> hangs.
Clifford>
Clifford> : Jerry> Adding debug and kdebug 25 to the options file doesn't help. I
get no
Clifford> : Jerry> output other than pppd started in the syslog output. If I kill the
Clifford> : Jerry> process, the logfile shows that pppd was terminated.
Clifford>
Clifford> The log files for messages may differ from those above for your Linux
Clifford> distribution. The messages are distributed by syslogd according to
Clifford> the configuration of /etc/syslog.conf, so check this file to find where
Clifford> messages are actually sent. Mine is
Clifford>
Clifford>
Clifford> # /etc/syslog.conf
Clifford> # For info about the format of this file, see "man syslog.conf"
Clifford> #
Clifford> # NOTE: YOU HAVE TO USE TABS HERE - NOT SPACES.
Clifford> # (Tabs may or may not be needed. The message above is old.)
Clifford> #
Clifford>
Clifford> *.=info;*.=notice /usr/log/messages
Clifford> *.=debug /usr/log/debug
Clifford> *.warn /usr/log/syslog
Clifford>
Clifford> local2.* /dev/console
Are those `=' chars correct? I've got:
*.debug,*.kern /var/log/ppplog
And the file exists. Startup messages are appearing in this file, so I think
syslogd is using this.
Clifford> --
Clifford> Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
Clifford> /* Better is the enemy of good enough. */
--
Jerry Quinn Tel: (514) 761-8737
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: (514) 761-8505
Speech Recognition Research
------------------------------
From: Cindy La Vigne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Default gateway in route table
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 16:32:17 GMT
In article <7f7g5c$qh0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having trouble getting routes to load properly at boot-up time.
>
> The following route table enables my system to work fine with nslookup, ping,
> sendmail, etc.:
>
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> www.alias.com * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0:0
> 206.238.176.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 7 lo
> default * 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
> My problem is when I enter a default gateway through netcfg, and then reboot,
> the Gateway column is replaced with the www.domainname. The following route
> table is displayed:
>
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface www.alias.com *
> 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0:0 206.238.176.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
> 3 eth0 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 7 lo default
www.mydomain.com
> 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
###############################################################################
This section did not format properly in my original message; the table should
look as follows:
===============================================================================
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
www.alias.com * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0:0
206.238.176.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 7 lo
default www.mydomain.com 0.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
###############################################################################
>
> With this route table, nslookup just hangs. At this point if I type the
> following commands, I can get my route table to display the correct
> information: (Not necessarily correct, but one that works!)
>
> route del default
> route add default gw 206.238.176.40
>
> I have tried to add "route add default gw 206.238.176.40" to the
> /etc/sysconfig/static-routes file but the command is not recognized at boot-up
> time. (Maybe I don't have the correct syntax for the file)
>
> I am also using an ISP and maybe I should be using their IP address as my
> default gateway, but I haven't been able to get things to work with it. It
> just doesn't seem to make sense that my default gateway should be pointing to
> the machine itself.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
--
Cynthia La Vigne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Radovan Brako)
Subject: Re: Routing problems ?
Date: 16 Apr 1999 18:34:44 +0200
Looks like a problem with MTU Discovery. How is L1 connected to
the Internet ? Directly from the L1 Linux machine, or from a
router attached to the L1 local net ? Is any firewalling
configured on the Linux machine (or on the router, whichever
applicable) ?
In brief: You must not filter out "ICMP Destination Unreachable:
Fragmentation Required but Don't Fragment Bit Set" packets. Or,
try configuring the PPP link with MTU equal to 1500 on both sides.
If this is not the solution, ask again ...
RB
In <7f63bk$kna$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cor Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I hope some one can give me some clues about my problem.
>We have a network that consist out of 2 subnets. Both subnets are connected
>by a ppp link. Both ends of the ppp connection is a Linux box (both running a
>2.0.36 kernel. One is a Redhat 5.2 distribution (called L1) , the other one
>is a slackware (called L2)). L1 has a permanent Internet connection. L2
>connect via a dial-up line to L1. Both L1 and L2 are using IP-aliasing. The
>subnet containing L2 has also a few win95/98 machines in it. L1 has to route
>between the Internet and the subnet containing L2.
>What is the problem ? When we browse with our win95/win98 machines on the
>WWW, some sides never respond to our browser. When we visit the same side
>from L2 we do get the page in. L2 and the win95/98 machines are in the same
>subnet. If we try an other service on the same side, using a win95/98
>machine, (we use www.webcrawler.com mostly to test) say telnet
>www.webcrawler.com, we have a login prompt within seconds. What goes wrong ?
>I tried to trace the IP packages with tcpdump on L1 as well L2. I traced on
>L1 both eth0 and ppp0. On L2 I traced also eth0 and ppp0 (L2 is the gateway
>for the win95/98 machines to get out). When looking at the tcpdump output, I
>can see that the initial connection between the win95/98 machine and say
>webcrawler is done correctly( win95 send a few packages , webcrawler response
>with acknowledgements etc.). At the moment webcrawler starts sending the data
>for the page, it seems they loose their connection. Webcrawler is sending
>over and over an acknowledgement to the win95/98n machine, but this
>acknowledgement never arrives there. It does arrive on L1 (eth0), but never
>gets routed to L1 (ppp0).
>Even if I make static routes to the win95/98 on L1, we still have the same
>problem.
>Does this looks familiar to some one ?
>Regards
>Cor Wood
>--
>Cor Wood
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Wolfhaven Solutions
------------------------------
From: Jure Simsic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do I find out why my IP aliases don't work
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 23:00:17 +0000
Brian McCauley wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jure Simsic) writes:
>
> > I'm trying to set up a firewall. We have our private network (192.168.87.0).
> > Our ISP assigned us default IP 193.138.44.23 (net 193.138.44.16) and the router
> > is on 193.138.44.17. And they said that the net 193.138.44.64/255.255.255.240
> > will be routed to 193.138.44.23. So I'm trying to test this and I've set some
> > aliases from 193.138.44.64 net to eth0.
>
> I think you shouild really be alaising these onto the other card, but
> that's probably not important.
>
Not really. The other card should have 192.168.87.1 (private network)
and i should catc the routed network (193.138.44.64) on 193.138.44.23..
Here's a picture how my network topology looks like:
routed network
def gw |----- 193.138.44.64/255.255.255.240
|193.138.44.17 |
| |
ISP | 193.138.44.23 (eth0)/255.255.255.240
-- -------- firewall
us | 192.168.87.1 (eth1)/255.255.255.0
|
........|..........
private network |
192.168.87.0/ |
255.255.255.0 |
-------------------------------
| | |
| | |
| A | B | ...
192.168.87.2 ...
[193.138.44.66]
Hope this is somewhat more clear..The important stuff at the moment is
above .......
> > I can get out fine through def gw and from outside back as well to default ip
> > (.23), but i can't reach any of the aliases.
> > traceroute just keeps bouncing back from the router.
>
> Are you saying that it you telnet to a distant machine and then try to
> traceroute one of the alias addresses it packets loops between the
> ISP's router and your router?
>
I'm saying that if I traceroute from a distant machine to the other -
routed IP (193.138.44.66 for example), it starts looping. I tried to
alias one other from the "default" net (193.138.44.25) and I could get
on no problem - e.g. telnet/ping/etc from distant to alias worked.
I'm adding output of traceroute to the default IP and to the aliased one
below..
> You are sure this address shows up in ifconfig?
>
Yes. Here are my ifconfig outputs:
# ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:CD:89:5A
inet addr:193.138.44.23 Bcast:193.138.44.31
Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8748 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1532 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:CD:89:D4
inet addr:192.168.87.1 Bcast:192.168.87.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
# ifconfig eth0:0
eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:CD:89:5A
inet addr:193.138.44.65 Bcast:193.138.44.79
Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Interrupt:7 Base address:0x310
# ifconfig eth0:1
eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:CD:89:5A
inet addr:193.138.44.66 Bcast:193.138.44.79
Mask:255.255.255.240
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:0
Interrupt:7 Base address:0x310
> If you are saying something else what else?
>
> > and my netstat -r says
>
> That's good - some raw hard facts (well almost). You should really
> use the '-n' switch as we are not privy to your /etc/hosts.
> "ifconfig" output too is also needed to really make sense of this.
> This you are about it the actual looping traceroute output would be
> good.
>
Oops, sorry, it was 8 hours after is started by the time %-)
Here's the num one..
# netstat -arn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
193.138.44.66 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0
193.138.44.65 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0
193.138.44.16 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0
eth0
193.138.44.64 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0
eth0
192.168.87.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
0.0.0.0 193.138.44.17 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
> Please remember that when you are asking for help you are often "too
> close" to the problem. You should always avoid replaceing raw hard
> facts with fuzzy cooked ones as your pre-conceptiopns may obscure the
> issue.
>
Hope I did it more clear this time =)
Am i right in assumption, that if another network was routed to this IP,
I should be able to catch those IPs, if I had matching aliases on the
card? At the moment I have the feeling that those IPs are not routed
right..
Thanx a lot
Jure
--
Jure Simsic
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Traceroutes output:
# traceroute -n 193.138.44.23
traceroute to 193.138.44.23 (193.138.44.23), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 193.2.31.81 129.158 ms 139.341 ms 149.561 ms
2 193.2.31.72 150.479 ms 193.2.31.87 147.885 ms 159.491 ms
3 193.2.31.70 138.88 ms 149.482 ms 149.584 ms
4 193.2.141.36 158.903 ms 139.235 ms 149.536 ms
5 193.138.63.9 159.158 ms 139.154 ms 159.796 ms
6 193.138.32.2 138.822 ms 149.629 ms 159.363 ms
7 193.138.63.38 149.223 ms 149.327 ms 159.557 ms
8 193.138.44.23 149.166 ms 149.457 ms 159.651 ms
The aliased one:
# traceroute -n 193.138.44.65
traceroute to 193.138.44.65 (193.138.44.65), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
1 193.2.31.81 152.29 ms 149.352 ms 149.586 ms
2 193.2.31.87 149.078 ms 149.561 ms 193.2.31.72 149.472 ms
3 193.2.31.70 148.693 ms 149.479 ms 149.626 ms
4 193.2.141.36 149.278 ms 149.243 ms 149.628 ms
5 193.138.63.9 149.088 ms 149.154 ms 149.61 ms
6 193.138.32.2 179.013 ms 129.438 ms 139.615 ms
7 193.138.63.38 169.022 ms 149.477 ms 139.592 ms
8 193.138.63.37 159.153 ms 159.46 ms 129.56 ms
9 193.138.63.38 169.18 ms 139.379 ms 149.389 ms
10 193.138.63.37 158.999 ms 149.509 ms 149.57 ms
11 193.138.63.38 149.089 ms 159.395 ms 149.72 ms
12 193.138.63.37 158.647 ms 179.514 ms 149.518 ms
13 193.138.63.38 159.055 ms 159.502 ms 189.588 ms
14 193.138.63.37 159.07 ms 189.514 ms 159.695 ms
..and so on..
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Subject: Re: Help with broken PPP?
Date: 16 Apr 1999 17:18:54 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jerry Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Are those `=' chars correct? I've got:
*.=debug
means only send debug level messages to that file. *.debug means send
all messages of debug or higher severity to that file. Thus your line
below does not really make any sense, since kern is a higher level than
debug and thus is already sent. But why do you want ALL log streams sent
to ppplog. The only ones used are
daemon (for pppd), local2 (for chat) and maybe kernal (for pppd with
kdebug). Also the *.kern may cancel the *.debug so that only kern level
or higher messages get sent to /var/log/ppplog.
So I would rather have
daemon.*,local2.* /var/log/ppplog
Note that after you change syslog.conf, do
killall -1 syslogd
(but do not do killall syslogd or you will switch off all logging)
>*.debug,*.kern /var/log/ppplog
>And the file exists. Startup messages are appearing in this file, so I think
>syslogd is using this.
------------------------------
From: Alexander Mattausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Can't See Samba Server on network
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:45:11 +0000
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Do you have IPX or NetBEUI installed on the NT boxes ? If so,
> and you're not using these protocols
> then remove them.
No, only TCP/IP.
> There appears to be a nasty Windows bug where if a machine
> becomes a master browser on one tranport it starts announcing
> itself as master browser on the TCP transport also.
>
> nmbd doesn't like this :-).
I noticed this, it's fun reading /var/log/log.nmb. :-)
But now something new appeared: cannot find domain master browser. The samba
server is not configured to be a domain master and I thought it wouldn't be
necessary since the time samba was a domain master the problem was even worse,
sometimes samba couldn't even be found with Find->Computers.
Perhaps some more information on the configuration might help:
Samba server:
Samba 1.9.18p10
domain master = no
local master = yes
preferred master = no
os level = 2
2 NT Workstation with SP4 (in the same workgroup as the samba server)
Another odd thing: On one NT box (NT1) I can see the other NT (NT2) and the Samba
server in network neighborhood, but smbclient -L //NT1 states as browse list NT1
and NT2 with NT1 as master.
And to make life even more complicated: on the same subnet are some more Linux
boxes (without samba, I think they shouldn't matter) and, also on the same subnet
but behind a switch, two other NT domains with one NT Server each.
Since I've tried nearly every combination of the master lines above (even setting
os level to 255) and all didn't help I'm pretty clueless now. At least one can
connect to the samba server, but I have the feeling there is something going
wrong.
Alex Mattausch
------------------------------
From: Cris Cris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: No ppp0 shown by ifconfig ?
Date: 16 Apr 1999 23:17:33 GMT
I've had no problems configuring a ppp connection with a local isp,
but when I try with Worldnet.ATT, I'm always hung up on after 45-60
seconds or so. When I run ifconfig, there is nothing there for
ppp0. I've even double checked all of my settings with ATT's Linux
Dialup Howto. Anyone have any quick thoughts ? Otherwise, I think
I'll just drop ATT and stick with the local isp.
TIA and Cheers !
pK.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pppd 2.3.7 demand dial HELP!!!
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 17:23:24 GMT
I am having some difficulties in getting pppd 2.3.7 demand dialing running on
Redhat 5.2 (kernel 2.0.36). I can connect with PPP just fine using netcfg in
Xwindows, but I cannot get ppp to work using demand dialing from the command
line (although it appears to connect - see log below). I did everything I
could think of (and I have been generating a lot of banner-ad impressions for
Dejanews, if you know what I mean). I did rebuild the kernel for pppd
2.3.7... I am at the end of my rope, with this� Can anyone see what I am
doing wrong?? Thanks!
PPPD Invocation script:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr
/usr/sbin/pppd -detach /dev/modem
115200 mtu 700 mru 700 defaultroute demand 192.168.1.40:192.168.1.40
ipcp-accept-local ipcp-accept-remote holdoff 6 kdebug 7 idle 340 connect
'/usr/sbin/chat -vf /etc/ppp/chat.txt'
CHAT.TXT Script:
'' 'ATH0'
'' 'AT&FH0S11=5S6=4L0M1'
'OK' 'ATDT8120798'
'CONNECT' \r
'ogin:' 'myusername'
'word:' 'mypassword'
LOG OUTPUT:
Apr 16 10:09:13 nelson chat[2128]: CONNECT
Apr 16 10:09:13 nelson chat[2128]: -- got it
Apr 16 10:09:13 nelson chat[2128]: send (^M^M)
Apr 16 10:09:13 nelson chat[2128]: expect (ogin:)
Apr 16 10:09:13 nelson chat[2128]: 28800/ARQ^M
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: ^M
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: Verio, Inc.^M
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: ^M
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: NWMLS members enter login:
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: -- got it
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: send (myusername^M)
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_ioctl: get unit: 0
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70010
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70010
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 70000
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson pppd[2127]: Serial connection established.
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson pppd[2127]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: expect (word:)
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: nwmls<ENTER> password:
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: -- got it
Apr 16 10:09:32 nelson chat[2128]: send (mypassword^M)
Apr 16 10:10:12 nelson pppd[2127]: write: warning: Input/output error (5)
Apr 16 10:10:12 nelson pppd[2127]: Modem hangup
Apr 16 10:10:12 nelson pppd[2127]: Connection terminated.
Apr 16 10:10:12 nelson pppd[2127]: Connect time 0.7 minutes.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "tester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to do secure X11: NT Workstation SP4 (SecureCRT v2.4, Exceed v6.1),
Redhat Linux 5.9.7 [Starbuck]: SSHD v1.2.26
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.misc
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 19:01:31 GMT
Topic sums up the configuration..
I SSH (3DES encryption) into the Linux box with SecureCRT 2.4b1, and export
DISPLAY to my NT Workstation.
Now do I make X11 *secure*?
------------------------------
From: "Gero H. Marten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux/Apache Guru Needed ($$) Update
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 20:06:35 +0200
BadMango wrote:
>
> We are a Cambridge, MA company looking into setting up a Linux web server and
> need some one with real world EXPERIENCE in Linux and Apache. In addition, this
> person needs to be able to communicate with and essentially instruct the
> network manager in the basics of day to day management of this system.
> Professional references and a current resume required.
Hey, is this an advertisement?
I can't believe that a newsgroup is the right place for your
concern. I suppose you should really invest some money an get
someone to you you place.
--
Gero H. Marten
<http://www.provi.de/gmarten/index.html>
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Squid for linux
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 09:46:25 GMT
How can I configure squid in my linux server where kernel 2.0.34 is installed?
Actually I want to setup a proxy server in my linux server. If anydoby can
answer please send me a reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enamullah
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Duane Stiffarm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux IP Masquerade and ADSL (PLEASE HELP!!) mattsearch
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 22:32:15 GMT
I'm not sure why you would want to use the Linux box as your router for the
two realworld static IP boxes, security? Using linux as a router is great
for the internal subnet but if your other two machines need their static IP
addresses available to the outside world, why don't you just use the same
external gateway IP as the Linux router box on the other machines? It may
not be what you want, but it'll get them on the net without showing the linux
ip.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, we just got our ADSL line in, and while the speed is wonderful,
> we are having network headaches. If you can help, please send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or reply here.
>
> The Goal: For now, it's relatively simple. We have 5 static IP's
> assigned to us by the ISP. (in this case, Southwestern Bell Internet
> Services). We have 3 total machines we want to share the ADSL
> connection, altho a 4th and 5th may come online later. We have one box
> thats a pentium and it has linux installed, as well as 2 ethernet cards,
>
> this machine is the one we want to act as a router. The idea is that one
>
> NIC is connected to the ADSL modem, the other NIC is connected to the
> hub, and thus, the rest of the network. We want the two machines behind
> the linux box to have thier OWN IP. This is very inportant, we do not
> want to masquerade, since certain services REQUIRE each one to have
> thier own unique IP, and we have static IP's to assign to these
> machines. One is running linux, the other is running windows.
>
> The Problem: We've gotten the linux router (in this case we're calling
> the linux box with two NIC's in it thats acting as gateway "router")
> connected, and we've even gotten both NIC cards configured, and given
> them each an IP address (2 out of the 5 we were assigned). We have the
> subnet properly configured, and I have managed to get my windows box to
> use the NIC thats plugged into the hub as a gateway. The problem is,
> despite the fact that I tell my windows box it's IP, once logged
> connected to the ADSL, it's masqueraded as the IP on the NIC thats
> plugged into the ADSL modem. I must be able to "tunnel" through the
> linux box, and still have MY IP on the windows box show on the net, thus
>
> allowing me to do what I need to do. Since it's IP Masquerading, in the
> current situation, it seems assigning my windows box an IP is useless
> since once on the net it will show me as being at the linux router's IP.
>
> Solutions? Please help out. Again, the goal here is to use the linux box
>
> as a sort of router, but still have the boxes behind it use their own
> IP's that are assigned by the ISP. (static IP's). We do NOT want the
> windows box (or other linux box for that matter) masquerading as the
> router box. IF you can help, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED] or post reply
> here. Thanks!
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
