Linux-Networking Digest #911, Volume #10 Mon, 19 Apr 99 00:13:52 EDT
Contents:
Re: IP masquerading firewall - ftp problem (Richard Steiner)
Re: Getting Linux to go through Wingate (Jon Martin Solaas)
Re: FREE Computer Documentation (jik-)
More info (Was Re: RedHat 5.2 - How do I install a net card if not in installer?)
("Nitron Ferocity")
Re: Configure 2 ethernets SMC Elite 16( WD8013) with RH 5.2 (Tom)
Ip Port Forwading... Can anyone help? (Chris Markovic)
Re: PATH Question (M Lewellyn)
My Socks dont fit (Harry)
Dialer Daemon dead (Erik Verhagen)
NNTP+knews+cancel problem (Armand)
Re: Samba/subnets/can't see neighbours (Jens =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCbler?=)
Re: Memory, darn it (Jeff Stewart)
Re: Newbie--3c509b can't recognize (Greg H.)
Re: Newbie Seeks Networking Direction ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: pppd client to Attachmate RLN server (Randy Cope)
RedHat login on a Novell 4.1 server (MazterVIP)
Re: PLIP interface won't start under 2.0.36 (Dick Repasky)
Re: Email with Earthlink, Sendmail, exmh, mh, Linux libc5 ("Clifton T. Sharp Jr.")
Re: No? 100Mbit -> 10Mbit (Frank Sweetser)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IP masquerading firewall - ftp problem
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:10:59 -0500
Here in comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake unto us, saying:
>I can download files in Web browser, but why do ftp sessions have
>problem? I tried simple ifpwadm rules:
>
>ipfwadm -F -p deny
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.1/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.2/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.3/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
>What did I miss?
The default Linux IP Masq setup only supports "passive" FTP sessions by
default, and you must load a special module in order to allow active
FTP sessions (or else you can configure your various FTP client(s) to
use passive FTP instead -- NFTP supports this, for example).
The example configuration I posted earlier shows how to do it; just add
something like this:
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp.o
in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local or whatever.
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
Omit needless, redundant, unnecessary, repetitive words.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,alt.linux,linux.config,linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Getting Linux to go through Wingate
From: Jon Martin Solaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 18 Apr 1999 21:28:10 +0200
"Rinaldi J. Montessi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (who wants to get things working the other way round asap: Linux proxy
> > for the windows boxes...)
>
> I also want to get things working the other way. Will samba do it or
> should I look elsewhere. I need ideas.
Try IP-Masquerading or ipchains:
On a 2.0 kernel try
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.10.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
or if you are running a 2.2 kernel:
ipchains -P forward DENY
ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.10.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
You will also have to specify that the linux-box is the default
gateway in the Windows setup. And of course, your kernel must be
compiled with support for this stuff. (Standard RH kernels usually
support masquerading out of the box.)
--
Jon Martin Solaas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 12:56:49 -0700
From: jik- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: FREE Computer Documentation
Chris Sherlock wrote:
>
> FREE Computer Documentation
>
> books, standards, specifications, source code, and more
> ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/LDP - The Linux Documentation
> Project!
>
> Welcome there.
xc/doc/hardcopy - The X Window System source tree
------------------------------
From: "Nitron Ferocity" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: More info (Was Re: RedHat 5.2 - How do I install a net card if not in
installer?)
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 19:59:43 GMT
Some information on the problem that might be helpful..
ifconfig returns only the entry for lo, not eth0
i tried 'ifconfig eth0 io_addr=2c0 irq=10' after reading man ifconfig to get
the command args right (i guess), which says twice 'operation is not
supported by device', and twice 'eth0: unknown interface'
ping 170.x.x.x (netfinity nameserver) pings a few times until i press ctrl+c
saying 'error: Network unreachable',100% packet loss
i searched in config files but maybe im not looking in the right place.
please help
--
// Liamq ////////////////////
"Dust can quite easily be structural"
liamq at punkass dot com
liamq at my-dejanews dot com
------------------------------
From: Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Configure 2 ethernets SMC Elite 16( WD8013) with RH 5.2
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 19:38:09 -0700
Younes:
I don't know if this will be useful to you, and I am just getting the
hang of this myself (w/SuSE 6.0), so please excuse and correct any
misstatements, but I recently set up a dual-homed machine with an SMC
80xx and a 3Com 3c509, and had some problem getting the SMC card to be
recognized as well when I compiled the kernel with built-in support for
SMC-Ultra. When I recompiled with all modules, lsmod showed that
SMC-ultra was loading a module called 8390. BTW, when I set up the
hardware I had to supply io=0x280 and irq=3 arguments on the load line.
:Tom
Younes Yajoud wrote:
> 2 ethernets SMC Elite 16( WD8013) with RH 5.2
>
> Hi I have cable modem intenet access and I have RH 5.2 with this
> configuration:
> Server Linux:
> RH 5.2
> Processor : Pentium 90 MHz
> RAM : 40 Mo
> Hard Disk SCSI : Seagate 1 Go
> IDE : Conner cp 100 Mo
> CDROM SCSI : Sony
> Graphic adapter : ATI mach 32
> SCSI adapter : Adaptec AH 2940 PCI
> Network Card :2 SMC Elite 16( WD8013) i/o =280; IRQ= 3 ;
> RAM=D0000
>
> i/o=300; IRQ=10; RAM= CC000
> Mouse : 3 butons ms-compatible
>
> 3 Clients working with Windows.
>
> The probleme is my linux doen't recognise my 2 Networks Cards and my
> mouse doesn't work in X.
> I have only 3 posibilities to configure my NIC:
> 1) i/o =280; IRQ= 3 ; RAM=D0000
> 2) i/o=300; IRQ=10; RAM= CC000
> 3) by software( in windows)
>
> I need help to configure this server.
>
> Thanks for any help
>
> Sorry for my english is not good, my mother tongue is french.
------------------------------
From: Chris Markovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ip Port Forwading... Can anyone help?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 10:34:05 +0800
Hail Linux Guru's...
I am having a little problem with Ip Port forwarding under Redhat 5.2
(2.0.36)
First let me explain what I am trying to do... I want to be able to set
up an internet gateway for a local network, to access the internet...
now this local network has 12 machines now I want to be able to access
any of these machines from remote... I have software to access them but
in order to decide which machine to access I have decided to use Ports
to determine which machine I am accessing...
----------------
Internet ----| Linux Gateway | --- Port 5901 --------| Nt Machine 1 |
---------------- |- Port 5902 --------| NT
Machine 2|
|- Port 5903 --------|
NT Machine 3|
ETC
Now I have Ip masquarading functioning perfectly... as every machine can
access the internet, as if they were a dial up.
I have also installed the patch to permit Ip AUTO FW, IP Port FW etc...
and they are compiled and installed...
and i can assign the address into IPPORTFW / IPAUTOFW to redirect, but
nothing happens... It wont allow me to connect... it just says server
not found... Now the software is listening on the correct ports... and I
know the redirection is correct... but nothing is being forwarded...
Is it something I could be missing in my routing table... ??
My route settings are as follows:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS
Window irtt Iface
203.27.235.240 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 576
0 0 ppp0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1500
0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U
3584 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 203.27.235.240 0.0.0.0 UG 576
0 0 ppp0
203.27.235.240 is my dial up connection
the command i type for ipportfw ing is
ipportfw -A -t 203.27.235.240/5900 -R 192.168.0.1/5900 (for first
machine)
ipportfw -A -t 203.27.235.240/5901 -R 192.168.0.2/5900 (for second
machine)
etc
etc
I hope this is enough information
Thankyou for your time...
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: M Lewellyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: PATH Question
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 19:54:48 -0700
If using csh or tcsh:
'setenv PATH <PATH>'
If using sh, ksh, bash, etc.:
'export PATH=<PATH>'
where <PATH> is the path you want.
M Lewellyn
------------------------------
From: Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My Socks dont fit
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 20:38:21 +0000
I am running Linux on my Laptop at work behind a socks proxy and am
having trouble configuring a package called dante to allow me access the
web with programs like telnet, ftp, ping etc. If anyone has managed to
get dante proxy client working can they give me a little tip to two.
I have managed to compile it but I cant find out how to configure the
damb thing
Sorry if this question is a bit simple for you all.
HHH
PS if anyone can think of any other solutions apart from dante or NEC
socks client please let me know
Thanks HHH
setup:
Client: Red hat 5.2
Lan Card - Xircom 56.6 modem & 10/100mb combo card
2.036 Kernel
Server: NT4 + MS Proxy 2 ( working socks compatible )
Direct connection through ISDN
- Please don't say get rid of the NT proxy and use IP masque or
something like that because I am not the chap who decides that and it is
not an option.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 04:42:47 +0200
From: Erik Verhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dialer Daemon dead
Wat does the message "Dialer Daemon dead" mean ?
it appears on the dialmon client just after it has connected to the
dialmon server and after it has said : "Dialer Daemon alive"
thanks
Erik Verhagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Armand)
Subject: NNTP+knews+cancel problem
Date: 19 Apr 1999 02:48:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I posted this with knews, and, as you can see, it duly sends a from-header and
my own-invented nospam-replyto-line.
I have one problem with it, and that is that it does not allow me to cancel my
postings. It says that it cannot cancel an article that is not mine, whenever I
try.
I used to post with Netscape, and there cancelling never was a problem (NS is
OK, it just takes too long to start up).
Knews uses my network name in the From-line and I manually delete the machine
name out of this. But cancelling is impossible, whether I try with, or without
machine name.
Has anybody an idea what I have done wrong?
Thanks
Armand
Slackware 3.4, knewsconfig:
readActiveFile: False
retrieveDescriptions: False
fillNewsrcFile: True
checkForNewGroups: False
askHowMany: True
*keepThreadInfo: Subscribed
*sortThreads: date
*replyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*extraHeaders: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
*defaultCharset: iso-8859-1
*cacheTrailSize: 5
------------------------------
From: Jens =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCbler?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba/subnets/can't see neighbours
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 22:21:25 +0200
I've nearly got it. I read in an article, that I need one domain master
and one local master for each subnet. But there's still one Problem:
I can access form the net 1.0 up to the 100.0 net, but the other
direction isn't possible and I don't know why. No server has lmhosts
entries or things like this.
thanx for any help
Jens
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Stewart)
Subject: Re: Memory, darn it
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 22:55:55 GMT
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999 09:59:08 -0600, Jon McKee wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>I am having trouble getting Linux to recognize 128mb installed RAM. I
>have edited the lilo.conf file to include:
>append="mem=128M"
>but it still reports my total memory to be 64mb.
>
>I have checked several FAQ's and searched the linux.org site but cannot
>find any information on this subject. Can somebody help?
>
>Jon McKee
Did you rerun lilo after editting lilo.conf?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg H.)
Subject: Re: Newbie--3c509b can't recognize
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 03:19:27 GMT
Kevin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I can't get linux to find or recognize my ethernet card it's a 3c509b.
> It works fine in NT but I've tried to get it to go in Xwindows, no luck.
> I've redone the kernel and made sure it was enabled--nothing. When I go to
> ifconfig eth0 says it's not a device. It's listed as supported? I'm using
> redhat 5.2. Tthe book I'm using the guy is using the same card as reference.
> Please help. Email replies please to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have the same card and had a hell of a time with it. First, you should
disable PnP (the documentation with the card should explain it easily). Next,
try reconfiguring the card with the included software. My original problem
was the IRQ. Linux seemed to like IRQ 11 better than 10 for me. That may work
as well. Oh, and be sure to disable PnP in the BIOS since you probably don't
need it.
Greg H.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Seeks Networking Direction
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 02:30:10 GMT
How did you get your NE2000 compatible ethernet NIC to work under Red Hat 5.2?
How does one add an ethernet card after a non-network installation?
Derek
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Michael J Surette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Earl Beck wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Heres what I have:
> > A Packard Bell 486 SX2 50 Mhz (I know I know) running Win 3.11 and a
> > P133 running Win98 that I built. Not too shabby for a poor college
> > student!!! Both have RedHat 5.2 installed. I am wondering what would be
> > the best way to network them and using what OS? I would like to
> > incorporate at least one computer as a Linux Workstation and or Linux
> > Server. Also need to know what kind of cheap NICs will be compatible
> > both in Win 3.11 or 98 and Linux and whether I should run em through a
> > bridge or just pier to pier. I can do the cabling myself so thats not a
> > concern. Thanks on any guidance provided......!
> >
> > Humbly Curious!!!
>
> I've had no difficulty at all with any isa ne2000 compatible cards under
> any of these os's. If you're not going to run more than the two stations
> then a direct cross-connected cable (pin 1 -> pin 3 & pin 2 -> pin 6 ...
> one pair, same in the other direction) will pull you through. You can
> even go full duplex if you want.
>
> HTH
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Randy Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pppd client to Attachmate RLN server
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:40:56 -0500
Clifford Kite wrote:
> Randy Cope ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> : I found the readme on the CBCP option that would allow for MD5
> : encryption, and compiled that into pppd.
>
> I *think* that you need to add the pppd option "callback xxxxxxx" where
> xxxxxxx is the number the peer is to call back. This is gleaned from
> grepping the ppp source code - I've not actually done CBCP.
>
> --
> Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
Clifford,
Thanks for the suggestion. It's getting a bit further in negotiation, but
now I seem to be getting a loop in cbcp looking for a particular response.
For example:
--begin--
.
.
Apr 18 14:16:39 ares pppd[1050]: rcvd [CHAP Success id=0x99 ""]
Apr 18 14:16:39 ares pppd[1050]: cbcp_open
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: rcvd [CBCP Request id=0x1 < UserDefined
delay = 0 number = > 00 01] 02
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: 7
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: user callback allowed
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: 2
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: 1
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: user callback allowed
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: 1
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: 1
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: -5
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: length: -244
Apr 18 14:16:40 ares pppd[1050]: user admin defined allowed
.
.
--end--
The length value keeps decrementing until about -83000, then segfaults.
Anyway, I haven't looked much at the code to see what it expects. I'll
probably do that later tonight.
Thanks again!
Randy/
------------------------------
From: MazterVIP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RedHat login on a Novell 4.1 server
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 22:39:54 +0200
How do i logon a Novell 4.1 server from linux....i cant find any client
on novell's homepage...
can somebody help me
///MazterVIP
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dick Repasky)
Subject: Re: PLIP interface won't start under 2.0.36
Date: 19 Apr 1999 03:35:18 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:33:15 -0400, Jeff Brubaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I'm trying to get a plip network interface started using the 2.0.36
>kernel, and it won't go. This is a mostly stock RH5.2 machine, the
>kernel is recompiled - but I've gotten the same problems with the stock
>RH kernel.
>
>I set the interface up using linuxconf (bad idea?) although I've tried
>with ifconfig manually and get similar results. The error message I get
>is:
>
>SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
>plip0: unknown interface.
>SIOCSIFDSTADDR: Operation not supported by device
>plip0: unknown interface.
>netmask: Unknown host
>
>To me, this appears as if the plip module is not correctly loaded -
>I shouldn't be getting errors setting network interface parameters if
>the necessary networking modules are in memory. However, lsmod tells me
>that plip is loaded just fine. Is there another module? The module
>dependencies don't list one.
>
>If anyone has gotten it working, I'm looking for help here. The lp
>module is not loaded, nor is any other parallel port module. Printing
>support was compiled as a module if I remember correctly, so that
>shouldn't be interfering, but printing does appear to work (appear -
>I don't have a printer on that machine, but it looks good). This means
>it shouldn't be IRQ/IO address problems.
>
>Jeff Brubaker
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Are you using the correct plip device? On my machine IRQ 7 and io 0x378
the appropriate device is plip1 under RH 5.2. I'v now switched to
kernel 2.2.5, and the correct device is plip0. Anyway, you might check
the device. Correct irq's and ioports are listed in the plip mini howto
and possibly in the networking howtot.
Good luck,
Dick
--
Remove the underscore from my e-mail address to reply by mail.
------------------------------
From: "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.mh,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Email with Earthlink, Sendmail, exmh, mh, Linux libc5
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:53:20 -0500
Keven R. Pittsinger wrote:
> "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Keven R. Pittsinger wrote:
> >> "Clifton T. Sharp Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > Keven R. Pittsinger wrote:
> >> >> Here's a sample returned mail:
> >> >> [snip]
> >> >> ... while talking to pompano.pcola.gulf.net.:
> >> >> >>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >> <<< 550 Access denied
> >> >> 554 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Service unavailable
> >> >
> >> > Your address isn't [EMAIL PROTECTED] and Earthlink's mail server
> >> > knows it. Use your real address.
> >>
> >> No kidding. Why you think I asked if anybody had working sendmail.cf's
> >> and mtstailor files for Earthlink? I do *NOT* understand sendmail.
> >
> > So what you're saying is that you want a configuration that lets you use
> > a bogus address. In that case, you're going to have to change EARTHLINK'S
> > sendmail.cf file; no amount of changing your own sendmail.cf will help you
> > do that. It is EARTHLINK'S sendmail that is rejecting your message. Every
> > time you send e-mail through Earthlink that has a bogus From address, the
> > Earthlink mailer will reject it and send it back to you.
>
> No, I need to rig sendmail.cf so that gulf.net and AOL truly consider me
> as part of Earthlink. Freddie.jamstar.com is my home machine. I've asked
> this several times. Trust me, you're *NOT* helping.
Then you need to use the tip someone else gave you already. Sendmail will
default to your hostname+domainname for outgoing mail unless you specify
a fully-qualified domain name to be used in outgoing mail. Find the
sendmail.cf lines
=======
# my official domain name
# ... define this only if sendmail cannot automatically determine your domain
#Dj$w.Foo.COM
Dj
=======
[DASHES ARE MINE] and change the last line:
=======
# my official domain name
# ... define this only if sendmail cannot automatically determine your domain
#Dj$w.Foo.COM
Djearthlink.net
=======
Then all mail that starts out with a From: line with no domain in it
(e.g. From: freddie) will be processed differently. Right now, the defaults
make it change to "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"; after the change,
it will change to "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]".
Better?
--
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
| Cliff Sharp | Whatever it is that hits the fan, |
| WA9PDM | it will not be distributed evenly. |
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
------------------------------
From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: No? 100Mbit -> 10Mbit
Date: 18 Apr 1999 17:03:54 -0400
Jens K�bler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
> Is there still the problem with ethernet cards which appear in ifconfig
> as 10Mbit although they are 100Mbit?
the only problem is that it confused people. now, rather than just always
printing out '10M ethernet', it now just says 'ethernet'.
--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.5 i586 | at public servers
"Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk ?"
Microsoft spel chekar vor sail, worgs grate !!
(By [EMAIL PROTECTED], Felix von Leitner)
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
