Linux-Networking Digest #922, Volume #10 Tue, 20 Apr 99 12:14:45 EDT
Contents:
IP Forwarding not working for Redhat 5.2? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: HDD Spindown - For a Year! (Erik Hensema)
Re: 3com905b - help! (Lars Stokholm)
Re: VERY URGENT !!! : Samba networking ("Gregory Kreymer")
connections die very mysteriously (masquerade problem?) (Pekka Savola)
Re: IP Forwarding not working for Redhat 5.2? (Pekka Savola)
Re: Black hole routing with Linux 2.0 kernel? ("M.C. van den Bovenkamp")
Re: small linux on a 386i with 6 meg RAM and 8 meg harddisc ("Curt")
Resolving Hostnames/IP-Adresses from MAC-Address (Andreas Altenberger)
Re: USENET sucking! (Glen)
Re: Using smbmount ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Routing with 2 Ethernet-Interfaces ("Bob Marley")
Re: Squid ("Jan Johansson")
Re: QUESTION ? What are the IP bandwidth limitations of Linux ? ("Jan Johansson")
Re: Login as root ("Hans Tegnerud")
Printing from a Win98 machine in Linux ("Gregory Kreymer")
Re: NT faster than Linux? (Iain Georgeson)
Re: DCHP and Cable Modem (Smachine)
Future Domain 18X00 SCSI driver for Linux (Kelvin Leung)
Re: Configure NE2000 compatible ethernet NIC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IP Forwarding not working for Redhat 5.2?
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 09:48:30 GMT
Greetings,
I am fortunate enough to have a third PC with two ethernet cards for a couple
of weeks. Thought I'd try out Linux's IP_FORWARDING support plus whatever
other interesting configurations can be explored with this setup. Redhat 5.2
is installed on Host_A and Gateway as depicted below (Host_B is running NT
4.0 sp3, but that can't be helped).
==========
| Host_A |-- 192.168.85.60
========== |
|
========== |
| |-- (eth0) 192.168.85.20
|Gateway |
| |-- (eth1) 192.168.1.210
========== |
|
========== |
| Host_B |-- 192.168.1.3
==========
Here is what can (and cannot) be done currently;
A response is received when pinging;
85.60 --> 85.20
1.3 --> 1.210
85.60 --> 1.210
1.3 --> 85.20
No response when pinging;
85.60 --> 1.3
1.3 --> 85.60
So one symptom is that packets are not being forwarded by Gateway to hosts on
the other subnet (except Gateway, which is a host on both subnets of course).
I've been following the 'Linux Network Administrators Guide' by Olaf Kirch as
a guide. After rereading the relevant bits it seems that everything should be
working with the setup described below.
KERNEL and ROUTE CONFIG.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--- Gateway ---
The kernel in use on Gateway is a rebuild that includes;
- ne2k-pci and tulip driver (eth1 is a DEC card)
- IP_FORWARDING=Y
After enabling eth1, setting its IP and mask and adding a route, the routing
table entries are as follows;
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use IFace
192.168.85.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 9 eth0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth1
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 3 lo
--- Host_A --- 192.168.85.60
Routing table entries are as follows;
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.85.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 28 eth0
192.168.1.0 192.168.85.20 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 2 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
--- Host_B --- (NT) 192.168.1.3
Routing table looks like this;
Active Routes: Network Destination Network Gateway Interface Metric . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 192.168.85.0 255.255.255.0
192.168.1.210 192.168.1.3 1 . . . . . . . . . .
I'm hoping this is enough info for someone to point out where things are
incorrectly set up.
BTW, on a related issue, has anyone noticed odd behavior for IP accounting
(specifically ICMP) with Redhat 5.2 and ipfwadm 2.3.0? If I switch IP
accounting on, and some rules to count all ICMP packets for each interface
(eth0/1 on Gateway in this case), then every time I run `ipfwadm -A -l` both
the in and out count increments by 16 for eth0 only (even when there is no
network activity).
Thanks for looking at this. Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you like.
I will post the resolution to this problem in this thread ASAP.
Darius
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: HDD Spindown - For a Year!
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 15:23:47 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Peavey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I have an application whereby I would like to use a Linux machine as a
>network gateway. This particular function requires a very high Mean time
>between failures (MTBF) - I.E. 10 years without failure. I would like to
>set it up to powered up, with the necessary things loaded, and then left ..
>possibly forever. I would like to be able to run the thing for upwards of a
>YEAR or so without needing the HDD. Basically, the only time that the HDD
www.linuxrouter.org
boots from floppy, doesn't even NEED a HDD.
Just make sure you've got a redundant power supply and cpu fan...
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:06:09 +0200
From: Lars Stokholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3com905b - help!
cyberfiche wrote:
>
> Ok,
> I have a 3com905b network card but I can't get Linux to see it. In fact I'm
> not really sure how the conf.modules file should read. What should the
> alias be for the eth0? Considering all my other settings are correct for
> the network, finding the right alias should fix everything, right?
I have just put:
alias eth0 3c59x
this should detect the 3c905b card. (The 3c59x module is for many 3com
cards)
Brgds
Lars
------------------------------
From: "Gregory Kreymer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VERY URGENT !!! : Samba networking
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:08:50 -0400
Try using SWAT - a web based Samba Administration Tool that allows you to
change the /etc/smb.conf file. It comes with samba-2.0.3 (you may have to
upgrade, and if you haven't, I suggest that you do). Under SWAT you can
change the filename text display (Uppercase, lowercase) of your shares.
Hope that helps.
Greg K.
Stephane POMATTO wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi all
>
>A Big problem for which I would like a quick answer.....
>
>I'm running Rh 5.2 with 2.0.36 Kernel. Samba is installed and works
>correctly (I can see shares with an NT client)
>
>When I use SMBMOUNT to map an NT disk on my Linux box, it works
>correctly except ONE thing : every files I transfer are in Upper Case.
>
>I would like to know how to have files copied in Lower case. I have to
>make softwar updates by FTP and updates cannot be made because don't
>find files on FTP server. If I rename all files in lower case, updates
>work perfectly
>
>Thanks for your help.
>
>Steph
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pekka Savola)
Subject: connections die very mysteriously (masquerade problem?)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:07:05 GMT
Hi. I have been experiencing the following very strange problem with
2.2.6 (and previous kernels):
Sometimes (my guess is when there are a lot of connect() calls
simultaneously.. 30-40 perhaps) connections die very strangely after
that. Only rebooting works. ICMP works fine; I think UDP also works
(or else I have a really big dns cache).
II have two NIC's, one for the private lan (eth1; 192.168.1.2) and one
for the net (eth0; 130.233.25.176). For some reason, all connections
from the server try to use 192.168.1.2 address.. Wouldn't it be much
wiser to use eth0's IP address? Is there a way to change that?
Also, I'm using Ipchains 1.3.8, and I think this might be a
masquerading/forwarding problem.
As it happens, every connection from my masqueraded Win98 box works
fine despite the server having difficulties: only exceptions are those
that use identd (which is run on the server) or similar applications..
But this only slows it down a bit, doesn't disable connections
entirely.
So, the only thing affected seems to be connections from the server
which use the local lan address to connect to remote sites.
Does anyone have _any_ idea where to look for the problem or to fix
it? This is getting very frustrating.
Here are some, hopefully relevant, parts of 'strace ftp ftp.funet.fi':
[192.168.1.2 int nic, 130.233.25.176 ext nic, 128.214.248.6
ftp.funet.fi]
Notes: the non-working version freezes at connect() to ftp.funet.fi
Otherwise there doesn't seem to be much difference.
non-working connection:
=======
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x4000b000, 10652) = 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
connect(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53),
sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.2")}, 16) = 0
send(3, "t\310\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\3ftp\5"..., 30, 0) = 30
select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {5, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {5, 0})
recvfrom(3, "t\310\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\2\0\2\3f"..., 1024, 0,
{sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53),
sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.2")}, [16]) = 130
close(3) = 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
connect(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(21),
sin_addr=inet_addr("128.214.248.6")}, 16
======
And the working one:
=======
close(3) = 0
munmap(0x4000b000, 10652) = 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
connect(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53),
sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.2")}, 16) = 0
send(3, "g\337\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\3ftp\5"..., 30, 0) = 30
select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {5, 0}) = 1 (in [3], left {5, 0})
recvfrom(3, "g\337\201\200\0\1\0\1\0\2\0\2\3f"..., 1024, 0,
{sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53),
sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.2")}, [16]) = 130
close(3) = 0
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 3
connect(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(21),
sin_addr=inet_addr("128.214.248.6")}, 16) = 0
getsockname(3, {sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(1028),
sin_addr=inet_addr("130.233.25.176")}, [16]) = 0
setsockopt(3, IPPROTO_IP, 1, [16], 4) = 0
======
Pekka Savola pekkas at netcore dot fi
---
Across the nations the stories spread like spiderweb laid upon spiderweb,
and men and women planned the future, believing they knew truth. They
planned, and the Pattern absorbed their plans, weaving toward the future
foretold. -- Robert Jordan: The Path of Daggers
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pekka Savola)
Subject: Re: IP Forwarding not working for Redhat 5.2?
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:11:32 GMT
>other interesting configurations can be explored with this setup. Redhat 5.2
>is installed on Host_A and Gateway as depicted below (Host_B is running NT
>4.0 sp3, but that can't be helped).
Have you enabled IP forwarding i.e. addred the following to
/etc/sysconfig/network:
FORWARD_IPV4=true
Pekka Savola pekkas at netcore dot fi
---
Across the nations the stories spread like spiderweb laid upon spiderweb,
and men and women planned the future, believing they knew truth. They
planned, and the Pattern absorbed their plans, weaving toward the future
foretold. -- Robert Jordan: The Path of Daggers
------------------------------
From: "M.C. van den Bovenkamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Black hole routing with Linux 2.0 kernel?
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 12:04:13 +0200
Paul Gillingwater wrote:
> Does Linux act as a "Black hole" router? i.e., if a TCP packet arrives
> to be routed which is larger than the MTU size, and the "Don't Fragment"
> bit is set, what behaviour should we expect? At present, it seems to
> drop such packets silently. I would expect the Linux kernel to send an
> ICMP unreachable packet, so that the TCP stack at the other end can try
> sending the packets with the "Don't Fragment" bit in the TCP header
> clear.
Interesting; a cursory glance through the source seems to imply that it
*does* send ICMP type 3 code 4s (Destination Unreachable, Fragmentation
needed but "do'nt fragment" bit set) Take a look at
net/ipv4/ip_forward.c, especially line 151-152 and 279-282.
But I may well be missing something; I'm not *that* much of a kernel
hacker.
Regards,
--
Marco van den Bovenkamp.
CIO EMEA Network Design Engineer,
Lucent Technologies Nederland.
Room: HVS BZK 32
Tel.: (+31-35-687)2724
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: small linux on a 386i with 6 meg RAM and 8 meg harddisc
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 05:36:53 -0500
Take a look at http://209.75.231.175/index.html, take Small Linux Links.
SSG Berlin wrote in message <7fhitb$96j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Who can help me,
>
>i have only an 386i with 6 meg RAM and 8 meg harddisc. I �want use this
>hardware for tcp/ip networking with an wavelan pcmcia card.
>
>thanks Frank
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Andreas Altenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Resolving Hostnames/IP-Adresses from MAC-Address
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:12:52 +0200
Hi!
Has anyone got a tool to resolve Hostnames and/or IP-Adresses from a
known MAC-Adress?
Thanks.
-Andreas.
------------------------------
From: Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: USENET sucking!
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:18:48 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anybody suggest softwares and mechanisms to do news sucking from
> free USENET (public) servers, onto a machine through a proxy-server!
> The proxy-server is Windows based, but my other machines are Linux
> powered. A silly ruling by our SysAds forbids me to replace our Proxy
> server with Linux-Squid or something.
> Are there any Linux (X) based newsreaders, that can read from locally
> spooled news, which is sucked thru the proxy server???
> so in Q are 3 pieces of s/w :
> 1.) how can i suck news (for local reading) thru a proxy server?
> 2.) how can i route that news to some Linux News server
> 3.) if that can be done, then i can use any Linux news reader to read
> locally, else, is there any Linux news reader that can read news thru
> a proxy server?
DNEWS might be a solution. I'm fairly sure they have a version
for Linux. From what I've seen, they have versions for nearly
every OS I found, including OS/2.
--Glen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using smbmount
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 18:08:26 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jing Duan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I want to share the D drive in Win95
machine with Linux. I name the Win95
> machine as "main", the Linux as "hp"
and the network as "home". So, I have
> hp.home and main.home on my network.
The D drive is named as "main-d"
>
> I can use smbclient to access the d
drive. I type,
>
> smbclient //main.home/main-d
[snip]
> smbmount
//main.home/main-d /mnt
>
> to connect my drive, but after I type in the
password, it complains:
>
[snip errors]
I have Samba-2.0.3 working on my
home network. You may want to try:
smbmout //main.home/main-d -c 'mount
mnt/[your mount point]'
Hope this helps. (above advice pulled from man
pages) :)
Thomas
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Bob Marley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing with 2 Ethernet-Interfaces
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 14:13:52 GMT
Make sure that Forwarding is off as well
ipfwadm -F -p deny
should take care of it
Heiko Hildebrandt wrote in message <7fhgop$rso$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>I want to install a Linux-gateway-computer. The computer has two network
>interfaces to link two networks. I switched the routing-fuction in the
>kernel off. The routing should be done only by a special application. The
>routing between the two networks is not possible. Thats OK, but its
possible
>to ping both network interfaces in the gateway computer from both networks.
>How can I change this situation. The ping schould only be possible to one
>network interface (e.g. from network A to eth0 and from network B to eth1).
>What have I to do to get these result. Can I combine this problem with a
>special firewall configuration?
>Thanks Heiko
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Squid
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:03:10 +0200
> Ok I am running Suse 5.1 with squid (unknown version)
> 1. how do I set it up for transparent use
> ie anything is allowed to come in and out
You don't. SQUID is a http / FTP proxy ONLY.
> 2. Better yet how do I get ICQ on my 95 box to connect through
>squid
>
Use ipchains
> Or am I just wasting my time with squid should I rather use IP
>masquerading
Yes you are, and yes you should. ;)
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: QUESTION ? What are the IP bandwidth limitations of Linux ?
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 16:09:44 +0200
And also... and this is NOT to start a OS flame war. But remember
"Linux is only free if your time is worthless" (quote origin unknown) Do you
really have the compentence in your company to set linux up in a productive
enviroment?
------------------------------
From: "Hans Tegnerud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Login as root
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 20:36:46 +0200
Francisco Romero wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Is there a way to login as root remotely from telnet?
>
Yes there is.
If you check who�s on when you have logged in to your box
through telnet you will see that you have logged on through
ttypX (eg. ttyp2)
You should have the file /etc/securetty wich holds what terminals are
"secure" enough to let root log on to them. Add your ttyp1, ttyp2, ttyp3,
ttyp4 etc..
to that file and you will let root log on to your system.
root isn�t by default allowed log on through telnet as this compromises
security. You could:
su root (or just plain "su")
from another user logged in through telnet instead.
(But I know, it�s easier to be able to log on as root directly! ;)
/Hans Tegnerud
------------------------------
From: "Gregory Kreymer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Printing from a Win98 machine in Linux
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:35:44 -0400
Greetings. Does anyone know if I can use samba to access and print to a
printer that's hooked up to a Win98 machine? I know the opposite case is
possible (of course). Would appreciate any help.
Greg K.
------------------------------
From: Iain Georgeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: NT faster than Linux?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 20:14:31 +0100
#include <keep_html_off_usenet.h>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>MJ Ray wrote:
>> David Damerell wrote:
>> Screwy kernel configuration, perhaps?
>> I don't know, but their Apache configuration looks like it will
>> impose a fairly low limit on number of clients in their test.
[...]
>One test that should occur is to pass out the uniform hardware to
>teams representing each OS, and give them six hours to get
>ready for testing.
I would like to propose a fixed _budget_, including software licences,
but that would, of course, bias it towards Linux.
[...]
>At least the current rigged situation let a 2.2.2
>kernel in.
Largely, I suspect, because 2.2.2 had known problems talking to the Win
95 TCP stack. 2.2.3 was out and much better at it.
Still - it is worth taking note of this sort of "benchtest". If Linux +
Apache loses out to a competitor, the result does indicate problems in
Linux or Apache. In this case, the problem highlighted is that it
doesn't have a parent prepared to spend millions, lying, cheating and
stealing. How do we propose to remedy this oversight?
Iain says "O;-}".
--
The Linux kernel has actually not changed at all since January, '94. Linus
just increments "version.c" once every 48 hours and unleashes the "change"
on an unsuspecting Internet, bringing FTP servers to their knees.
-- Seen on linux-kernel
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 20:37:49 +0200
From: Smachine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: DCHP and Cable Modem
Larry wrote:
> I've just compiled a 2.2.4 kernal, and I'm using Red Hat 5.2. I've got
> two NE2000 clone cards in the machine, one to see the local network and
> one to see out my cable modem. I can get either card to see the local
> network without a problem (run ifdown, edit the configs, switch the
> cables and run ifup - and both work).
>
> However, DHCP through the cable modem constantly fails. Is there a
> config setting I didn't select in the kernal config? Any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
R U coming from kernel 2.0.36 or below ?
-->then you need to upgrade dhcpcd too then ....
had tha same problem :)
Cya,
Smacine
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelvin Leung)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Future Domain 18X00 SCSI driver for Linux
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 09:49:02 -0700
I have a Future domain ISA 18X00 SCSI card installed in my Linux system. I
have tried to locate the driver for it but no success. My system is a RH
5.2 with kernel 2.2.6. Starting from kernel 2.0.36 to 2.2.6, I don't see
any support for this SCSI card. I have tried Dejanews and nothing can
help. See if you can give me some advice. Thanks in advance.
Kelvin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Configure NE2000 compatible ethernet NIC
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 20:08:36 GMT
I think I am getting closer to a solution.
According to depmod, the NE2000 module ne.o depends on 8390.o, so I installed
8390.o:
insmod /lib/modules/preferred/8390.o
and then tried to install ne.o:
insmod /lib/modules/preferred/ne.o
insmod -o eth0 /lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o
/lib/modules/preferred/net/ne.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
How do I make the device "un-busy"?
Derek
In article <7fchdb$v9d$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> What steps must I take to have RedHat Linux recognize my NE2000 compatible
> ethernet adapter? The adapter settings are irq=7, io=0x320, base=0xC800.
>
> Here is my /etc/conf.modules:
>
> alias sound cs4232
> alias midi opl3
> options opl3 io=0x388
> options cs4232 dma=3,0 io=0x530 mpu_irq=9 irq=5 mpu_base=0x330
> alias eth0 ne
> options ne io=0x320 irq=7
>
> To activate eth0, I invoke:
>
> ifconfig eth0 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 up
>
> but ifconfig reports:
>
> SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
> eth0: unknown interface.
> SIOCSIFNETMASK: Operation not supported by device
> eth0: unknown interface.
>
> What must I do to correct this error?
>
> Derek
>
> Please cc: your response to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
