Linux-Networking Digest #982, Volume #10 Wed, 28 Apr 99 22:13:28 EDT
Contents:
Dial in ("matt")
3COM 3CCFE54TB PCMCIA 10/100 Base-TX Ethernet card (Michael James Weiskopff)
Re: 3c59x : unresolved symbol(s) problem in linux v2.2.6 (Vidar Andresen)
Re: Gateway problem? ("Marcel Janda")
Re: eth0 config strangeness ("Junky")
Linux and SAP (Andrew T LeCren)
secureCRT2.4b1 and ssh2 on RedHat Linux 5.2 (Pinghua Young)
Re: Mounting Drives on My Linux Server ("Tad")
Re: Can samba automatically mount an NT shared drive? ("Junky")
Re: Progress, but no success ("Junky")
Re: TCP/IP config headaches ("Junky")
Re: Translate (i)pppd hex output to ascii (Robert Sander)
Re: Another IP Masquerading problem (Michael J Porter)
Re: Set up DNS to resolve hostname to hostname:port? (Leslie Mikesell)
Re: need 1 clever linux/win95 network person ("Mike Rayborn")
Re: Samba - slow, painful BUT making progress ("Mike Rayborn")
Re: Linux as a firewall : performances issues ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: rpc.lockd : Where can I get it ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: diald doesn't dial ("Mike Rayborn")
Re: boot Linux over network ("David L. Courtney")
Mounting Drives on My Linux Server (Joseph White)
Re: How do you set up a VPN with Windows 9x and a Linux Firewall Server? ("Nobody")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Dial in
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 19:25:57 -0500
I have red hat 5.0 and i have it set up to where i can dial in to it. The
only problem is that i can't log in as root. Is that not possible from a
remoter computer or do i have to configure something?
Thanks,
Mat
------------------------------
From: Michael James Weiskopff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: 3COM 3CCFE54TB PCMCIA 10/100 Base-TX Ethernet card
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 20:19:01 -0400
How do you get it to work? I am running Red Hat Linux 5.2 on a toshiba
satellite pro 435 CDS with a 6 gig HD and 48 Megs of ram. I have the
updated PCMCIA card services drivers that supports this particular
PCMCIA card, but how do I do it. BTW I am also a newbie to Linux, and
even more of a newbie to linux on laptops. Any help would be
apriciative. Thanks in advanced.
Mike
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vidar Andresen)
Subject: Re: 3c59x : unresolved symbol(s) problem in linux v2.2.6
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:32:50 +0200
In article <7g5qpe$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "news" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>I can compile it into the kernel, but I don't know how to send the
>options=12 line to it. If anyone can tell me how to do that, I would
>appreciate it as well.
The Ethernet-HOWTO suggest:
[...]
For more information on (and a complete list of) boot time
arguments, please see the BootPrompt-HOWTO
<http://sunsite.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/BootPrompt-HOWTO.html>
10.1.1. The ether command
In its most generic form, it looks something like this:
ether=IRQ,BASE_ADDR,PARAM_1,PARAM_2,NAME
All arguments are optional. The first non-numeric argument is
taken as the NAME.
[...]
So in lilo you need to find where to pass it. I _guess_. I dont use
more than two arguments in lilo.conf:
[...]
image = /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36
label = linux
append = "ether=5,0x280,eth0"
root = /dev/hda8
[...]
If i had to pass a third, a '12', maybe:
[...]
image = /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36
label = linux
append = "ether=5,0x280,12,eth0"
root = /dev/hda8
[...]
I very much _guess_ this.
Mvh Vidar Andresen
------------------------------
From: "Marcel Janda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Gateway problem?
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 22:14:28 +0200
Hello again,
I have some more information about my problem with the network.
Thanks for the ideas but I don't see any timeout errors in the log. Here is
my ifconfig:
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:72 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:72 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:E8:57:08:95
inet addr:147.32.124.136 Bcast:147.32.124.159
Mask:255.255.255.224
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:123 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x360
I'm also getting an error message at bootup:
route: netmask doesn't match route address
I'm really at a loss here, so any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks again,
Sheryl
Curt wrote in message ...
>Are you getting any timeout errors in /var/log/messages on the eth0?
>Look at ifconfig eth0. Any errors? Any successful Tx or Rx?
>
>It's possible the irq is set wrong and have the same things happen.
Usually
>best to use the DOS program that came with your card to set the irq and io
>address. Turn off PnP so your system doesn't change it after you set it.
>
>
>Marcel Janda wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I've installed Redhat with a network card and I can ping my own ip address
>>and localhost but I'm not able to ping another computer on the same
subnet.
>>It's the same when I try to ping my ip address from another computer. When
>I
>>used the network configurator to set up the interface, the network address
>>was calculated automatically but it does not match the gateway ip given to
>>me by my network admin.
>>Here is the result of netstat -nr:
>>Kernel IP routing table
>>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
>>Iface
>>147.32.124.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.224 U 1500 0 0
>>eth0
>>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
lo
>>0.0.0.0 147.32.124.129 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
>>eth0
>>
>>The 147.32.124.128 is the value automatically calculated by the network
>>config. and 147...129 is the one given to me by my net admin.
------------------------------
From: "Junky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eth0 config strangeness
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:07:11 +1000
>Hi.
>I was trying to configure IP for my ethernet card which is an NE2100 PCI
>clone (driver is pcnet32) on my RH5.1 but I'm witnessing some weird
>behaviour.
Seeing that your network card is loading correctly & initialising the
driver, have you tried using the network configuration tool under x-windows
(netcfg) to set up the network card. this will set up all of the required
options to use your network cards, set up your routes etc.... if it still
hangs during boot, disable to atboot option and use 'ifup eth0' to start the
netcard configuration.
------------------------------
From: Andrew T LeCren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux and SAP
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 15:03:59 -0500
Hello,
I am currently trying to implement a tool which requires LLC-layer level
communications.
Specifically I need to be able to communicate over SAP 4 on a token ring network. Can
anyone
tell me if Linux supports LLC-layer communications and SAP 4 (i.e. through a similar
sockets
style API as in TCP/IP)? Or even pointing me towards documentation or HOWTOs would be
appreciated.
I have already checked out the networking and tcp/ip HOWTOs and FAQs. Thanks.
--
Andrew LeCren | "You may be right, it's all just a waste of time.
XC Development | I guess that's just a chance I'm prepared to take
Motorola - Ft. Worth | A danger I'm prepared to face. Cut to the Chase.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | - "Cut to the Chase"
------------------------------
From: Pinghua Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh
Subject: secureCRT2.4b1 and ssh2 on RedHat Linux 5.2
Date: 28 Apr 1999 17:37:17 PDT
I've installed ssh2 on RedHat Linux 5.2, and I am using secureCRT2.4b1
to test it out. I can't seem to get the public key and private key to
work though. I've generated the keys, and put my public key in the file
$HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys as a single line on the linux box. But I got
"server does not recognize your public key" when I try to use RSA for
authentication.
My sshd2 is configured to use ssh1 if clients can't support ssh2.
Any ideas what's wrong?
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: "Tad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mounting Drives on My Linux Server
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 17:36:18 -0700
Install samba and you can use smbmount.
T
Joseph White wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi All,
>
>
>I have two machines at home. One is a Redhat 5.2 server, the other is
>Dual Boot Redhat 5.1/Windows 95. I can ping the server or telnet in from
>either the Redhat 5.1 or Win95 box. In the the next few days I will load
>Samba on the server so I can see the resources from the Win95 machine.
>
>But first things first, I would like to get my linux box to mount the
>drives on the server, or what ever I need to do to see the resources
>without having to telnet in, i.e. so I can see them from file manager in
>KDE.
>
>Not really sure how to go about that.
>
>Any tips greatly appreciated.
>
>Thank You.
------------------------------
From: "Junky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can samba automatically mount an NT shared drive?
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:24:31 +1000
>> Hello,
>> I am using Samba and all is well! Win95 and WinNT can see the drives no
>> problem. But how can I get the linux box to automatically mount an NT
>> shared drive? So far I have beed accessing it manually using smbclient,
>> but it still does not allow me to mount it.
>
>Have you thought to put the smbmount statement that you manually enter,
>in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local file? That will cause it to mount
>automatically. Although, I think this is a bit of a hack. I believe
>that there is a simpler way of putting it in your fstab file, but I
>don't recall the details. It's probably in the SMB-HOWTO.
>
if you use the cabaret program from the console (red hat users) you can
configure you fstab file much more easily and safely. add a smbfs file
system to it and it will ask you for all of the details (userrname,
password, ip addr, smb server name, etc) and will mount it correctly at
boot.
~ Mikey
------------------------------
From: "Junky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Progress, but no success
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:30:01 +1000
>So I'm not having any luck getting pppd to connect. Initially, chat
>would not talk to the serial port, even though minicom could (I verified
>I was using the same device in both cases). Now, after a complete
>reinstall, chat seems to be able to talk to the modem (I can manually
>dial via 'cat - >/dev/ttyS1'), but it doesn't seem to want to listen.
>
>The log in /var/log/messages shows that chat is sending 'AT' to the
>modem and expecting 'OK', but it doesn't seem to receive it. Doing this
>manually in minicom works fine. Any clues would be greatly
>appreciated...
>
(RH5.x users) Try setting up your ppp connection under netcfg in X. i found
that it didnt work, (it dialled and connected but then disconnected) the
first couple of times until I put 0.0.0.0 in both ip address fields (for
dynamic ip). now it works fine. i could never get the ppp connection to dial
out using chat. i have 2 modems on my computer, a LT winmodem (56k PCI) for
win98 and im running an old ellcon 14.4k external on com4 for linux. both
seem to run at the same speed!!
~ Mikey
------------------------------
From: "Junky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP config headaches
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 10:37:24 +1000
Eric Mueller wrote:
>I believe it has
>something to do with my ROUTING entries but I do not know what. At the
>moment I have tried ifconfig and netcfg to no avail. In netcfg my
>ROUTING entries are blank. Also I am not running a nameserver on my LAN
>though I do have some names entered from my ISP's network so that when I
>PPP I can use it.
>
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>
Try running route on its own. This will allow you to define the routing
table. For my network, (1 linux, 1 win95, 1 win98/linux) i have the ip's
192.168.0.[1,2,3] on these machines. To allow my 'linux only' box to talk to
the others i had to run route manually and define the routing tables. I
typed :
'route add -net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.555.255.0 dev eth0'
to get it working. Then linux could talk to the other boxes. and the other
2 could talk to linux. Also check that your network card modules (or
compiled support) is detecting your netcard correctly.
~Mikey
------------------------------
From: Robert Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp,xs4all.isdn,nl.comp.isdn,de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: Translate (i)pppd hex output to ascii
Date: 28 Apr 1999 22:52:54 +0200
In de.alt.comm.isdn4linux Gerrit Hiddink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> some (all?) versions of (i)pppd print important messages only in hex
> characters. These messages sometimes contain clues as to why setting up
> a connection fails, so it is very important to be able to read these
> messages. They look like this:
> Apr 26 22:16:51 localhost pppd[888]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76 61 6c
> 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72 6e 61 6d
> 65 2e 0d 0a]
> I've written a tiny program to translate it into ascii. It could have been
> done with programs like 'hexdump', but figuring out how they work costs more
> time than writing it.
> My program is written as a filter, i.e. it accepts characters from stdin and
> writes them to stdout. You can start it with: "cat | hex", and then copy
> and paste the hexadecimal numbers into standard in. Compiling instructions
> are in the source.
nice, thank You for the idea, I have "specialized" it to display the
hex-codes of isdnlog out of /var/log/daemon.log, that are coming after the
"HEX:" codeword:
/* compile with cc hex.c -o hex
** Converts hex to ascii
** Written by G. Hiddink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
** Spezialized by Robert Sander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*/
int conv(int a) {
if (a>'9') {
a=a|32;
return a-'a'+10;
} else
return a-'0';
}
void main () {
int a,b;
char code=0;
while (!feof(stdin)) {
a=fgetc(stdin);
if (!code) {
printf("%c", a);
if (a=='H') {
a=fgetc(stdin);
printf("%c", a);
if (a=='E') {
a=fgetc(stdin);
printf("%c", a);
if (a=='X') {
a=fgetc(stdin);
printf("%c", a);
if (a==':') {
code = 1;
}
}
}
}
} else {
while (a==' ') {
printf("%c", a);
a=fgetc(stdin);
}
if ((a==13)||(a==10)) {
printf("%c", a);
code=0;
} else {
b=fgetc(stdin);
printf("%c",conv(a)*16+conv(b));
}
}
}
}
--
Robert Sander "Is it Friday yet?"
@Home http://home.pages.de/~gurubert
pgp available there
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael J Porter)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,udel.linux
Subject: Re: Another IP Masquerading problem
Date: 28 Apr 1999 16:52:20 -0400
Do you have forwaring enabled? You have to have it compiled into
the kernel, and you have to write a one to something like
/proc/sys/net/ipv4_forwarding (don't have the exact file name
here.) I think there is a shell variable you can set in
/etc/sysconfig/network:
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=true
....
Doing so and running the appropriate redhat scripts will enable
forwarding.
Mike
////
In article <7g54r7$c8j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, OEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=>Hello,
=>
=>I realize that IP-Masq has been beat to death in the newsgroups, but digging
=>through the web and dejanews, I haven't had any real luck at all.
=>The situation: trying to setup IP Masq for a win9x peer-to-peer network
=>(tcp/ip 192.168.1.x) via the linux box (192.168.1.1, RH 5.2 [2.0.36], ppp
....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: Set up DNS to resolve hostname to hostname:port?
Date: 28 Apr 1999 20:19:26 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
VanderBilt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've setup a (Novell GroupWise) mail system inside my private network and have
>struggled with about the same questions: How do I redirect port 25 (the ISP is
>sending the mail to that port of my linux box of course) to port 25 on IP
>number 192.168.0.5, my internal mailserver. The answer was relatively simple
>(when I found it of course): Use "redir". This little piece of software allows
>you to redirect ports straight into your private network.
It is also very straightforward to set up sendmail on a linux box so
that it performs delivery of what it considers 'local' addresses
by forwarding to another server. In this configuration it can
also masquarade or rewrite the domain in the addresses of outbound
mail. Better yet, just get everyone to run POP or IMAP clients
directly to the Linux box instead of using GroupWise at all.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Mike Rayborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: need 1 clever linux/win95 network person
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:19:29 -0400
May I suggest you get "The Linux Network, M&T Books" by Butzen and Hilton.
What you want to know (and detailed instructions on what to edit) can be
found in the book. Too much to send as an email. The books about $40 US.
Good luck.
Mike Rayborn
linux2000 wrote in message ...
>OK I'm really dim. I've read all the docs 'til my head buzzes and nothing
is
>sinking in.
>Will somebody please explain (in thicket terms) which files need editing,
>what needs writing in them and what to enable in a compiled kernel
>
>the linux box has a realtek card (isa ne1000/2000 compat.) running SuSE
>linux 5.3
>
>e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>yes newbie; only been playing for 12 years(dos)
>Sorry and thanks in advance
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Mike Rayborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba - slow, painful BUT making progress
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:25:01 -0400
Try createing a LMHOSTS file in your C:\WINDOWS directory. The format is:
nn.nn.nn.nn hostname
You need to create one line for each host. 3 hosts = 3 lines.
That'll do it.
Mike Rayborn
Robin Jackson wrote in message ...
>Okay at last I can see my Linux box in my workgroup.
>
>HOWEVER when I double click on it I get an error message which reads:-
>
>\\Linux is not accesible
>The network is busy
>
>I find this hard to beleive as all 3 machines connected to the network are
>MINE and they ain't doing nuffin!!!!!!
>
>Any ideas??
>
>Robin
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Linux as a firewall : performances issues
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 00:33:47 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Charles-Edouard Ruault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course i would be really happy to use my favorite OS instead of
> spending a lot of $$ to buy products that would give the same
> performances or less ....
You may also want to look at some variant of BSD [FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD].
For handling simple network i/o, they all beat Linux hands down [1]. Of
course, if you're going to run any other type of application on it, you're
probably better off sticking with Linux. FreeBSD in particular can run Linux
binaries with no problems [at least, I've never had any], and sometimes runs
them even faster than Linux itself does [if they're heavily network i/o
intensive].
-Bill Clark
Systems Architect
ISP Channel
http://locale.ispchannel.com/
[1] - If you want to debate this with me, as I'm sure some of you will, please
do so offline. No need to start a flame war. :)
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Re: rpc.lockd : Where can I get it
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 01:21:45 GMT
In article <7g80d9$q2b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"David Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I require a copy of the latest version of the rpc.lockd (NFS lock daemon)
> for linux.
...
> I have compiled an old version but I am getting compile errors that I didn't
> get before I activated SMP in the kernel. I reuire this for file locking
> over the network as we have a distributed file system.
...
http://linuxwww.db.erau.edu/mail_archives/server-linux/Sep_96/0075.html may
indicate the solution you require?
tony
___________________________________________________________________________
One of the questions that comes up all the time is: How
enthusiastic is our support for UNIX?
Unix was written on our machines and for our machines many
years ago. Today, much of UNIX being done is done on our machines.
Ten percent of our VAXs are going for UNIX use. UNIX is a simple
language, easy to understand, easy to get started with. It's great for
students, great for somewhat casual users, and it's great for
interchanging programs between different machines. And so, because of
its popularity in these markets, we support it. We have good UNIX on
VAX and good UNIX on PDP-11s.
It is our belief, however, that serious professional users will
run out of things they can do with UNIX. They'll want a real system and
will end up doing VMS when they get to be serious about programming.
With UNIX, if you're looking for something, you can easily and
quickly check that small manual and find out that it's not there. With
VMS, no matter what you look for -- it's literally a five-foot shelf of
documentation -- if you look long enough it's there. That's the
difference -- the beauty of UNIX is it's simple; and the beauty of VMS
is that it's all there.
-- Ken Olsen, President of DEC, 1984
-
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Mike Rayborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diald doesn't dial
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:31:40 -0400
Try the following in you /etc/diald.conf file:
mode ppp
connect /etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer
device /dev/modem
speed 38400
modem
lock
crtscts
pppd-options name YOUR-LOGIN-NAME-HERE
local 10.10.10.100
remote 10.10.10.101
dynamic
defaultroute
include /usr/lib/diald/standard.filter
In the above the 10.10.10.100 address is the address of the gateway
connection (eth0 on my machine) that other machines use as the gateway
setting.
The 10.10.10.101 is any unused IP address in your network. This is what
diald monitors to see if it should bring up the connection.
Mike Rayborn
stone wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>RH 5.2, Diald 165. echo up>diald.ctrl works just fine. When I force
>the like up I can ping anywhere on the WWW, everthing works great. If I
>dont force the link up and I ping a site using the name I get unknown
>host, if I ping using IP I get scrolling net work unreachable messages.
>This worked once several weeks ago. Then I decided to set up DNS and it
>stopped. Since then I have re-partioned the hard drive, formatted, and
>completely reloaded the OS and reconfigured from scratch. Re-compiled
>and re-installed Diald. DNS off or on makes no difference. When DNS is
>on I am using the cache only DNS that comes with RH with no changes. I
>am also using the default Diald rules. and IPFWADM settings suggested
>(the same ones that once worked).
>
>Any suggestions on how to get Diald to dial on demand?
>
------------------------------
From: "David L. Courtney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: boot Linux over network
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 1999 01:35:19 GMT
Rico Dreier wrote:
>
> is it possible to boot Linux from the network without the usage of
> a CD-ROM or a harddisk, only by using a floppy disk?
>
>It is possible; I just read about it in one of the HOWTOs...I think it
was either NET-3-HOWTO or Networking-Overview-HOWTO. HTH.
DC
------------------------------
From: Joseph White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mounting Drives on My Linux Server
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 21:45:58 +0000
Hi All,
I have two machines at home. One is a Redhat 5.2 server, the other is
Dual Boot Redhat 5.1/Windows 95. I can ping the server or telnet in from
either the Redhat 5.1 or Win95 box. In the the next few days I will load
Samba on the server so I can see the resources from the Win95 machine.
But first things first, I would like to get my linux box to mount the
drives on the server, or what ever I need to do to see the resources
without having to telnet in, i.e. so I can see them from file manager in
KDE.
Not really sure how to go about that.
Any tips greatly appreciated.
Thank You.
------------------------------
From: "Nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How do you set up a VPN with Windows 9x and a Linux Firewall Server?
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 16:54:10 -0500
Edmond Cheng & Elza Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:T_vV2.45830$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> look up the Linux VPN Masquerade HOWTO at the following URL:
>
>
ftp://ftp.rubyriver.com/pub/jhardin/masquerade/VPN-howto/VPN-Masquerade.html
>
That doesn't help me at all. I need information on how to setup a VPN
Server (IPSec), and where to get a IPSec VPN Client for Windows 9x.
Scot
> >
> > Win95 Laptop ---- Linux Firewall/VPN Server ----- Internet
> > x.x.x.10 x.x.x.1/y.y.y.254
> >
> >
> > VPN Connection to Corporate Network from Internet:
> >
> > Mail Server ---- Linux Firewall/VPN Server ==== Internet ==== Win95
> > Laptop
> > x.x.x.15 x.x.x.1/y.y.y.254
> > z.z.z.73/x.x.x.10
> >
> > What software is available for Linux and Win95 to create a secure VPN
> > connection to the corporate network?
> >
> > How would I setup the software so that a secure tunnel is created from
> > z.z.z.73 to y.y.y.254, and will encapsulate the IP packets so that the
> Win95
> > Client will use x.x.x.10 to access the corporate network?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Scot
> > GENROCO, Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News
> ==----------
> > http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the
> World!
> > ---------== Over 72,000 Groups, Plus Dedicated Binaries Servers
> ==--------
>
>
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
=========== Over 72,000 Groups, Plus Dedicated Binaries Servers ==========
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
