Linux-Networking Digest #25, Volume #11 Mon, 3 May 99 10:14:52 EDT
Contents:
Re: DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142 (Eric)
Re: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P ublic
Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!! (Thomas Zajic)
Re: US Robotics 56k modem (Mike)
Re: HELP: Samba and Filelocking (Frank Bauer)
Re: CDROM Server
Re: Trouble connecting to ISP using PPP (Clifford Kite)
Re: TCP wrapper problem (Thomas Zajic)
Re: diald ("Keith Wright")
HELP: Samba and Filelocking (Frank Bauer)
How to set a Proxy server ("John Smith")
Re: RH5.2 and D-link (Mogens Kjaer)
Re: IP Masqurade and VPN (Phil Howard)
Synchronizing mail folders .. ? (Peat Bakke)
Re: pppd: 244000 not supported ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: IP Masquerading (mist)
Telnet to S/390 Unix Services (Michael Casile)
Re: Minicom is sloooooooowwww ("T.E.Dickey")
Re: Minicom is sloooooooowwww ("Zbigniew M. Strzempa")
Problems with PPP & PAP (Juan Carlos Cuesta Cuesta)
Re: Problems with PPP & PAP (Jim Chisholm)
Re: Newbie... DNS question (Randy Sandberg)
tcpdump to trace dialup ppp traffic (Roland Thienpont)
samba and smbmount (Roland Thienpont)
Printing from a Win98 machine in Linux ("Gregory Kreymer")
Re: IPFWADM ("Gary Rule")
Re: Connection Established but nothing works ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Newbie--3c509b can't recognize ("FD")
Re: E-mail and Linux ("Marvin (Georg Ortmanns)")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric)
Subject: Re: DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 01:07:10 GMT
On Sun, 02 May 1999 22:06:24 +0100, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said to everyone and their mother:
|->Hi,
|->
|->Does the following network DEC chip work with linux and
|->NT4... DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142
|->
|->Many thanks
|->
|->Matt
Yep.
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com/ The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
=========== Over 72,000 Groups, Plus Dedicated Binaries Servers ==========
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Zajic)
Subject: Re: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P ublic
Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 01:50:24 GMT
On Sun, 2 May 1999 04:03:25 -0500 , InocuLAN wrote:
> [ ... ]
Who is this idiot, and why doesn�t he _finally_ go away?
Thomas
--
=--- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria ---=
=-- "It is not easy to cut through a human head with a hacksaw." M.C. --=
=-- Posted with Free Agent 1.11/32 running on Linux 2.0.36/Wine-990226 --=
=--- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at ---=
------------------------------
From: Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: US Robotics 56k modem
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 21:55:40 -0400
I've got a USR v.90 X2 56k external modem that works great under RH5.2
It's not a PnP modem so if your asking for help with that I can't do it, if
it's a general question I might be able to help :)
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Piwowarski wrote:
> Has anyone out there successfully installed a 3Com US Robotics 56K
> Faxmodem? I'm running Redhat 5.2, the isapnp tools produce config files
> but I still can't get at the thing.
>
> Keith
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Bauer)
Subject: Re: HELP: Samba and Filelocking
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 14:04:26 +0200
> We have the same problem on a Novell network. It is a bug in Access
where
> the database was created without setting up the users on the access
machine.
> We tried using Novell rights to the file but even 2 people with full
access
> could not open it at once. We had to recreate the database in Access with
> the proper names of the users and their rights and privileges embedded in
> the file.
>
thank you for this hint, will try this one, I hope it may be help....
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 02:35:26 +0200
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CDROM Server
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Steve Fowler wrote:
> Was wondering if anyone has used Linux in setting up a CD-ROM server? I
> am working on setting up a CD-ROM server to use on a NT based LAN.
Yes I used my Linux Box as an NFS server, since your cdrom drive
becomes part of your file system once you mounted it, i was able
to access the cdrom from different Linux Boxes over the LAN,
and i worked fine.
If your clients are Windows and not Linux, don't use NFS for
security reasons.
I suggest you make your cdrom drive a smb share:
Install Samba and edit your /etc/smb.conf to fit your needs.
> The
> server must be able to serve multiple users simultaneously, allow
> multiple users to access a single CD at the same time and be accessible
> across the LAN.
You won't believe it, but a cdrom is not quite as fast as a hard disk.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Trouble connecting to ISP using PPP
Date: 3 May 1999 06:34:37 -0500
Aaron and Lisa Ginn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: May 2 23:38:54 localhost pppd[1485]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
: user="USERID" password="PASSWD"]
: May 2 23:38:54 localhost pppd[1485]: rcvd [PAP AuthNak id=0x0 49 6e 76
: 61 6c 69 64 20 4c 6f 67 69 6e 3a 20 55 6e 6b 6e 6f 77 6e 20 75 73 65 72
: 6e 61 6d 65 2e 0d 0a]
I'm not sure why the hex dump occurs but it says:
Invalid login: Unknown username.
which pretty much says the username you send isn't what the ISP needs.
Everything else looks normal. Check with the ISP about what they expect
for the username. Even if you think it's correct - sometimes an ISP wants
something prepended or appended to it.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Zajic)
Subject: Re: TCP wrapper problem
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 01:55:42 GMT
On Sun, 02 May 1999 18:59:40 GMT, JCA wrote:
> My /etc/hosts.deny file reads
> ALL: .domain1.com, host1.domain2.net
> by which I want to deny access to my machine to any
> hosts in domain domain1.com, and to host host1 in
> domain2.net.
> However, I can telnet from host1.domain2.net.
> How come?
Have you tried tracking it down with �tcpdmatch�?
Thomas
--
=--- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria ---=
=-- "It is not easy to cut through a human head with a hacksaw." M.C. --=
=-- Posted with Free Agent 1.11/32 running on Linux 2.0.36/Wine-990226 --=
=--- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at ---=
------------------------------
From: "Keith Wright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diald
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 08:05:26 -0700
thanks for the info
Keith
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Bauer)
Subject: HELP: Samba and Filelocking
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:17:40 +0200
hi, big problem here
we are now running our file-server under SuSE Linux 6.0 (Kernel 2.0.36),
newest stable version of Samba.
but now we are using a MS Access97 Application on a file share with access
from multiple users.
But if one user had opened the database it is for other users not able to
open the same database. Access says, already in use.
i cant see any wrong thing in my config, but please, have a look on it!
THANKS
Frank
Here is my SMB.CONF
[global]
interfaces = 192.168.21.2/255.255.255.0
dos filetimes = yes
dos filetime resolution = yes
share modes = yes
preferred master = no
printing = bsd
server string = Samba Server
getwd cache = yes
mangle case = no
workgroup = BB3
fake oplocks = no
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
netbios name = LINUX_SERVER
case sensitive = no
time offset = 15
keep alive = 30
dead time = 15
null passwords = yes
printcap name = /etc/printcap
max log size = 1000
preserve case = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
guest account = nobody
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
load printers = no
security = user
wins server = 192.168.21.1
short preserve case = yes
os level = 2
oplocks = no
wins support = false
debug level = 1
shared mem size = 5242880
[homes]
create mode = 0750
writable = yes
comment = Heimatverzeichnis
browseable = no
locking = no
[printers]
comment = All Printers
browseable = no
printable = yes
public = no
read only = yes
create mode = 0700
directory = /tmp
[FUER_ALLE]
writable = yes
comment = Installierte Programme
path = /FOR_ALL
browseable = yes
locking = no
write list = @nogroup,@users
user = @users,@nogroup
public = yes
[DATEN]
delete readonly = yes
writable = yes
comment = Daten
path = /DATEN
locking = no
public = yes
oplocks = no
fake oplocks = no
[Data]
delete readonly = yes
writable = yes
path = /DATEN/daten
public = yes
locking = no
oplocks = no
fake oplocks = no
------------------------------
From: "John Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to set a Proxy server
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 06:08:37 -0700
The subject sais it all, I'm using a Linux 2.0.34 kernel and wanna setup a
proxy on my box. Anyone got any ideas how to do this?
------------------------------
From: Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH5.2 and D-link
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 10:13:49 +0200
Dale Einarson wrote:
>
> Hello all,
> Does anyone know about the d-link adapters?
Which adapters?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Howard)
Subject: Re: IP Masqurade and VPN
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 08:20:33 GMT
On Sun, 2 May 1999 04:26:03 -0500 Tony Muckleroy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
| I am trying to use VPN from my WIN98 machine through my recently set up Red
| Hat 5.2 Linux box. I have Diald, IP Masquerade, etc. set up and everything
| else seems to be working well, except VPN. Any ideas, any experiences?
What kind of VPN setup are you trying to do? Are you trying to make one net
of private addresses talk directly to another net of different private
addresses on a LAN connected somewhere else? Can you show your config?
--
Phil Howard KA9WGN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Peat Bakke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Synchronizing mail folders .. ?
Date: 2 May 1999 19:18:23 -0700
Hello,
I check my mail from several different locations during the day, and I was
wondering if there's a way to keep all of my mail folders synchronized. All
of the boxes I check my mail from are Linux machines with fetchmail, and my
mail servers both support POP3 (although only one supports IMAP).
Can anyone help? Is there a FAQ on this sort of thing floating around
somewhere?
Thanks!
-Peat
--
Peat Bakke - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.europa.com/~pb/
Powered by Linux since '95
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pppd: 244000 not supported
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 02:22:02 GMT
In article <7ghkq3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
kite@NoSpam.% inetport.com (Clifford Kite) writes:
[major snip]
> Where did the rule of 4 come from anyway?
This corresponds to the maximum hardware compression ratio supported
by most modems. E.g., if the modem is transferring a file at 28.8 in
a mode that supports a compression ratio of 4:1, then the serial port
must operate at 115.2 to sustain an uninterrupted tranfer.
In practice, you will rarely see a hardware compression ratio this
high.
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 12:40:39 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Hornblow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>On Sun, 2 May 1999 21:57:21 +0100, mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>>Forwarding: disabled. And if I do /proc/net/ip_forward I get Permission
>>>denied. As 'root' no less.
>>>
>>
>
>>You need to be typing
>
>>echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>>
>sorry folks, Im in the same boat, Permission denied, and I double
>checked my typing.....
>do you think I failed to enable it when running "make config"?
>
>
Possibly. Can you do
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
?
It should return 0 or 1 in the function is available. That path is for
the 2.2.* kernel, BTW, it may not be the same in the older one.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: Michael Casile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Telnet to S/390 Unix Services
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 08:38:46 -0400
I am currently using RH 5.1. I am trying to Telnet from Linux to S/390
Unix Services (Unix certified server). I can get in (w/most combos of
options) and it has the potential to be 100 times better than the
windows telnet (relative to screen-sizing, speed, viewability, etc.).
My problem is in VI on the remote host. It is better than Windows
telnet in that the VI screen matches the true size of my window et al
but ... I am having a MAJOR problem with echoing of characters. For
example, if I go to the top and hit 'j' 3 times, it puts 3 j's on the
screen. If I hit enter, it moves me down 3 or 4 lines but leaves the
j's. Moving around is painful with this apparently echo/mode problem.
I have tried various combinations of mode line, mode character, litecho,
inputbinary, outputbinary, ... via my .telnetrc file (I tried using them
dynamically without much success). On many combinations, I cannot seem
to log in (asks for my uid, I enter it, but it does not take the enter
key), and on those that I can log in ... vi works in this un-usable
way. I am not an expert on the different signals that go back and forth
between a telnet client and server. It would appear that I would want
character mode ... but possibly line mode (since that is under the
control of the remote host). Anyway, if anyone has had experience with
this, I could really use some expert advice. Thanks,
------------------------------
From: "T.E.Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Minicom is sloooooooowwww
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,apana.lists.os.linux.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 12:52:46 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Zbigniew M. Strzempa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok, my minicom is sooo slow. I type in a command it takes a few seconds to
>> respond. It is so slow connecting to my server that I time out before I can
>> type in my username and password. Any idea what is going on? Thanks.
perhaps an IRQ conflict
> i'd try to figure out the speed settings between comm and modem device,
> which means speed settings of serial port.
> cheers
> max
--
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 14:39:45 +0200
From: "Zbigniew M. Strzempa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,apana.lists.os.linux.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Minicom is sloooooooowwww
> Ok, my minicom is sooo slow. I type in a command it takes a few seconds to
> respond. It is so slow connecting to my server that I time out before I can
> type in my username and password. Any idea what is going on? Thanks.
i'd try to figure out the speed settings between comm and modem device,
which means speed settings of serial port.
cheers
max
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juan Carlos Cuesta Cuesta)
Crossposted-To: es.comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Problems with PPP & PAP
Date: 3 May 1999 10:49:45 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can get ppp to work since I updated from Redhat 4.1 to 5.2. I used the
following command:
pppd connect 'chat -v chat_secuence' crtscts -detach debug modem
defaultroute noipdefault /dev/cua1 57600
The serial link gets stablished but the problem arises in the PPP
negotiation. When my machine receives the LCP configuration request with
PAP, it rejects the connection:
========================================================================
Apr 24 15:14:42 myhost pppd[1014]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x76 <asyncmap
0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x1c4bdaf3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 24 15:14:42 myhost pppd[1014]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x76 <auth pap>]
========================================================================
I've alraedy added the file /etc/ppp/pap-secrets with the information:
========================================================================
myusername * mypassword
========================================================================
I've also tryed adding the flag pap-required.
I'm using RedHat 5.2 with PPP 3.3.X (the version included in RH5.2).
Please, help me. I'm tired of using Windows 95.
Thanks
J. C. Cuesta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jim Chisholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: es.comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.ppp,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Problems with PPP & PAP
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 10:15:46 -0300
==============72F2EECD68BA8D83B2C0639C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Juan Carlos Cuesta Cuesta wrote:
> I can get ppp to work since I updated from Redhat 4.1 to 5.2. I used the
> following command:
>
> pppd connect 'chat -v chat_secuence' crtscts -detach debug modem
> defaultroute noipdefault /dev/cua1 57600
>
> The serial link gets stablished but the problem arises in the PPP
> negotiation. When my machine receives the LCP configuration request with
> PAP, it rejects the connection:
>
> ========================================================================
> Apr 24 15:14:42 myhost pppd[1014]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x76 <asyncmap
> 0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x1c4bdaf3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Apr 24 15:14:42 myhost pppd[1014]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x76 <auth pap>]
> ========================================================================
>
> I've alraedy added the file /etc/ppp/pap-secrets with the information:
>
> ========================================================================
> myusername * mypassword
> ========================================================================
>
> I've also tryed adding the flag pap-required.
>
> I'm using RedHat 5.2 with PPP 3.3.X (the version included in RH5.2).
>
> Please, help me. I'm tired of using Windows 95.
>
> Thanks
>
> J. C. Cuesta
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've found that the easiest solution is to download pppsetup-2.15.tar.gz
from Sunsite..it's very easy to use.
You'll probably discover that it puts your username and password in quotes
and adds your username to the "options"
file as in
pap-secrets====> "username" *
"password" *
options====> "username"
Good Luck
Jim
--
=======================================================
Jim Chisholm
Dalhousie University, Dept. Physics Halifax N.S.
Canada
http://electron.phys.dal.ca
Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency Service
Lieutenant #2 Bay Road Station 59
http://www.fire-ems.net/firedept/view/HalifaxNSCA
=======================================================
==============72F2EECD68BA8D83B2C0639C
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Juan Carlos Cuesta Cuesta wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE> I can get ppp to work since I updated from
Redhat 4.1 to 5.2. I used the
<br>following command:
<p>pppd connect 'chat -v chat_secuence' crtscts -detach debug modem
<br>defaultroute noipdefault /dev/cua1 57600
<p> The serial link gets stablished but the problem arises in the
PPP
<br>negotiation. When my machine receives the LCP configuration request
with
<br>PAP, it rejects the connection:
<p>========================================================================
<br>Apr 24 15:14:42 myhost pppd[1014]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x76 <asyncmap
<br>0xa0000> <auth pap> <magic 0x1c4bdaf3> <pcomp> <accomp>]
<br>Apr 24 15:14:42 myhost pppd[1014]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x76 <auth
pap>]
<br>========================================================================
<p> I've alraedy added the file /etc/ppp/pap-secrets with the information:
<p>========================================================================
<br>myusername *
mypassword
<br>========================================================================
<p> I've also tryed adding the flag pap-required.
<p> I'm using RedHat 5.2 with PPP 3.3.X (the version included in
RH5.2).
<p> Please, help me. I'm tired of using Windows 95.
<p> Thanks
<p> J. C. Cuesta
<br> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</blockquote>
I've found that the easiest solution is to download pppsetup-2.15.tar.gz
from Sunsite..it's very easy to use.
<br>You'll probably discover that it puts your username and password in
quotes and adds your username to the "options"
<br>file as in
<p>pap-secrets====>
"username"
*
"password"
*
<br>options====>
"username"
<p>Good Luck
<br>Jim
<p>-- <br>
<br>
======================================================= <br>
Jim
Chisholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <br>
Dalhousie University, Dept. Physics Halifax N.S.
Canada <br>
<A
HREF="http://electron.phys.dal.ca">http://electron.phys.dal.ca</A> <br>
Halifax Regional Fire and Emergency Service <br>
Lieutenant #2 Bay Road Station 59<br>
<A
HREF="http://www.fire-ems.net/firedept/view/HalifaxNSCA">http://www.fire-ems.net/firedept/view/HalifaxNSCA</A><br>
=======================================================
<br> </html>
==============72F2EECD68BA8D83B2C0639C==
------------------------------
From: Randy Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie... DNS question
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 20:22:08 -0700
Stephen Carville wrote:
>
> Randy Sandberg wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Well, I've read several books as well as the famous "DNS-HOTO" and I
> > still can't get my secondary/slave DNS server to download db.* files it
> > needs from the master DNS server. Everything is on an isolated network
> > and the I've got the master working great. In fact, the slave works
> > great to except for one minor irritation... when I start named up on my
> > slave everything seems okay until I get a "Permission denied" statement
> > in regards to downloading my 2 db.* files.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any helpful tips on this matter.
> >
> > BTW, my master computer is using named 8.x and my slave or really
> > secondary is using named 4.9.x. I used the h2n perl script to create all
> > my DNS files. And yes, I created one set with the -v 8 argument for bind
> > 8* and -v 4 for bind 4*.
>
> Do you have a transfers-allowed statement in either of the affected zones?
> If so, you will need to add the ip address of your slave server.
>
> --
> Stephen Carville
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ----------------------------------------------------
> It's all right to have geniuses build systems for use by idiots, but
> the path from laboratory to marketplace needs to go through the
> proving ground of prudent engineering.
> Peter Coffee
I didn't use the transfers-allowed option. My book "DNS and BIND 3rd
ed." seems to say without the option listed anyone can download the
file. I'm betting now that from what you and others are saying I read my
book wrong. So, I'll put the option in and list my slaves IP. Thank you
so much for the help.
--
Randy Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... Oh wait,
he does!"
-- A signature spotted on Slashdot
------------------------------
From: Roland Thienpont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: tcpdump to trace dialup ppp traffic
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 18:42:21 +0200
When I start tcpdump it automatically selects eth0 to trace IP traffic.
Is it possible to tell tcpdump to trace ip traffic over my dial-up
connection to my ISP?
Roland
------------------------------
From: Roland Thienpont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba and smbmount
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 18:43:30 +0200
I just downloaded the latest samba version yet I cannot find the
smbmount and smbunmount. Is this not part of samba?
Roland
------------------------------
From: "Gregory Kreymer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Printing from a Win98 machine in Linux
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:35:44 -0400
Greetings. Does anyone know if I can use samba to access and print to a
printer that's hooked up to a Win98 machine? I know the opposite case is
possible (of course). Would appreciate any help.
Greg K.
------------------------------
From: "Gary Rule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPFWADM
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 12:47:42 GMT
I'm assuming that you want to open a port in the firewall to allow traffic
to the internal network...in which case:
Actually there are a LOT better ways to do this..especially if your doing
this from home.
If your using kernel 2.0.XX you want to use ipautofw or ipportfw...if you
are using kernel 2.2.XX then you need ipmasqadm they will do the same thing.
that should get you in the right direction
Mike Rayborn wrote in message ...
>I think you'll need to install a SOCKS server on your firewall machine and
>have the application behind the firewall open a socks port. There may be
>other ways to do this but this is all I can think of at the moment :)
>
>Mike
>
>NEVSKI wrote in message <7gjsvg$gnp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>I would like to open a couple of ports on my Linux firewall. I need to
open
>>some TCP ports to make ICUII (a videoconferencing program) work on one of
>>the machines in the network. I guess I have to use "ipfwadm" to do this.
>>What command do i use here??
>>
>>Help me plz, I'm totaly lost here.........
>>
>>
>>A linux newbie........ :)
>>
>>NEVSKI
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connection Established but nothing works
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 13:20:16 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been trying to get PPP up and running in Red Hat 5.2 for days
> now. I'm using a Motorola ModemSURFR 56K internal modem, I've set it
> up with setserial and it works just fine. I can connect to my ISP,
> Earthlink, and I am assigned an ip. I've done this through Usernet,
> XISP, Wvdial, etc... and in each case it's the same, once I'm
> connected I can't do anything. I can't ping any ip, domain, or find
> websites etc..
so HOW DO YOU KNOW youre connected ?
what does ifconfig tell you ( please tell us )
can you ping at least your providers dns-server?
ping by number
if that is not possible youre not connected
did you configure your system to use the dns-server?
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "FD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Newbie--3c509b can't recognize
Date: 19 Apr 1999 15:01:36 GMT
Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreef in artikel
<7ff9gm$129m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Yes thats what I did . What is a good easy card since I don't have disks
or
> documentation on my card
> Kevin
> Charles Pouliot wrote in message <7febtk$dcm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >When I installed linux on a Gateway 486 with 3c509b, I didn't have any
> >problem, but the installation disks warned that 3c509b may not get
> >autodetected properly (Debian linux) and suggested that if I had
problems,
> to
> >recompile the kernel with explicitly indicating a 3c509b, and not to
> >autoprobe/autodetect. Is that what you did when you say you redid the
> >kernel?
> >
> >
>
> Hi
> Just thought I'd add my words of wisdom - the 3c509 is a real bitch to
get recognized by the kernel. It took me about a month! Do you have a
soundcard in the system - take it out! Further do a zdisk i.e. make a
kernel on flop and try again - this did the trick for me.
Frank;
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 20:46:15 +0200
From: "Marvin (Georg Ortmanns)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: E-mail and Linux
Graham wrote:
> We're using Linux as our web and e-mail server. Clients collect their
> e-mail with Eudora Light from Windows 95 workstations.
>
> We want to move to a browser-based e-mail system. Can anyone recommend
> any software packages for this?
Try Netscape. It got an build in e-mail and news client. IMHO there is a
migration tool to convert e-mail from Eudora to Netscape format.
--
Regards
Georg Ortmanns (Marvin)
(for PGP-Key send Email with subject:send PGP-Key)
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
