Linux-Networking Digest #25, Volume #12 Tue, 27 Jul 99 15:13:42 EDT
Contents:
Re: IP Masquerading and ip_masq_ftp patches ("Alex Luchkovsky")
Re: (3c509) Selecting 10baseT or 10base2 ? (Casey Spangler)
Re: exportfs problem (Britt)
Re: tcpdump on RH6.0 is broken (Bryan)
Multiple Network Cards ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
pcfs not recognized -sol7x86 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux as a router (Robert Flemming)
help with invalid ICMP error (Mark DeVries)
win9x fs mount under linux (Istvan Pal (paulus))
Help with 2 netcards setup (Dave)
Re: IP Masq with one NIC ("Jan Johansson")
Re: Linux as a router (Eric LEMAITRE)
IP Masq with one NIC (Edward Liu)
Re: 2 ppp's / 2 isp accts (Clifford Kite)
Re: IP Masq with one NIC (Robert Flemming)
Netgear FZ310TX...dropping packets? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Linux as a router ("Rob Ferguson")
Re: DNS keeping connection open - HELP! (rubias)
Help with DSL and Linux (Dave)
NetBIOS names not recognized ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Multiple Network Cards ("Dylan")
Re: NetBIOS names not recognized (Roland Schatz)
Re: ICMP Patch For Masquerading (Alex Harrington)
Re: sendmail and autoreply. ("Leonid Fedotov")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Alex Luchkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading and ip_masq_ftp patches
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:56:42 -0400
These modules are usually compiled at the same time as the kernel itself.
Just recompile the kernel version you like and make sure you configure it
with masquerading enabled. Masquerading HowTo can be useful if you need more
detailed info.
Alex
==========
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Colin Guthrie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just set up IP masquerading on my Linux machine so other Win95
> machines can use the internet. However my installation (SuSE Linux
> kernal 2.2.5) hasn't installed the ip_masq_* patches. In my
> /lib/modules directory I have two kernal versions 2.0.36 and 2.2.5. The
> 2.0.36 has the reevant modules in the ipv4 dir but they have been
> compiled for the older kernal and wont work even when forced to load.
>
>
> The ipv4 dir exists in 2.2.5 dir but is missing the relevant files i
> need (ie CuSeeme, ftp, raudio, vdolive, quake, irc etc).
>
> I found the source for a icq module and compiled it and placed it in the
> ipv4 dir and insmod'ed it and it worked file. But I can't find the
> source for the other patches I want.
>
> Is this part of the kernal source. If it is then it's odd that it was
> not origianlly installed as I selected a Network package installation
> and other ip masq stuff was installed.
>
> Any help would be greatful
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Colin Guthrie
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Casey Spangler)
Subject: Re: (3c509) Selecting 10baseT or 10base2 ?
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:24:58 GMT
If you are adventurous, go get Donald Becker's setup program at:
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/setup/3c5x9setup.html
download the code, and follow the make instructions in the source
file. This worked great for me once I realized I needed to use the -f
flag to force the change to the firmware. You also need to know what
I/O port to use to find the card (default is 0x300, I think). The
command I used (I was going the other way, thinnet to UTP) was:
./3c5x9 -p 0x340 -F 10baseT -f -w
Worked like a champ, and I didn't have to futz with DOS.
On 27 Jul 1999 06:08:40 GMT, William Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>My 3Com509B ethernet card uses 10BaseT (twisted pair) port by default.
>How do I enable 10Base2 (coaxial) port instead?
>
> Yours truly,
> William Park
--
Remove all numerals and doubled letters (e.g. ww)
from my address to reply via e-mail.
Note: Other Probitans don't necessarily agree with me.
------------------------------
From: Britt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: exportfs problem
Date: 27 Jul 1999 15:26:32 GMT
���ȯ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I don't know why "tcp nfs" is not appear.
nfs is done over ufs so you won't see a 'tcp nfs' line
: Question is
: 1.How can I export my linux system.
every thing you're doing seems good to me, you might want to check the files
/etc/hosts.allow
/etc/hosts.deny
and check to see if you are denying connections to portmapper
: 2.Is it ok,this rpcinfo -p report?
yup
: 3.When I ran mount command in my ultra sparc system,
: why I got that message. (NFS service not responding)
Looks like you're not getting through portmapper to the nfs daemons.
B
=======================================================================
Britt Bolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] britt.bolen.com
------------------------------
From: Bryan <Bryan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: tcpdump on RH6.0 is broken
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:22:32 GMT
ok - here's the scoop. it now works - and one of the posters was
correct; you need a packet filter or similar kernel config option to
make it work.
I don't know exactly which option it was, but when building a kernel,
choose packet socket and other related [sounding] options until it DOES work.
Bryan <Bryan@[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: (typed as root):
: # tcpdump
: tcpdump: socket: Socket type not supported
: system is redhat 6.0 (mandrake, really, but its the same core).
: I rebuilt libpcap and tcpdump from source - same problem.
: is there some fix or workaround that I'm now aware of?
: --
: Bryan, http://www.Grateful.Net - Linux/Web-based Network Management
: ->->-> to email me, you must hunt the WUMPUS and kill it.
--
Bryan, http://www.Grateful.Net - Linux/Web-based Network Management
->->-> to email me, you must hunt the WUMPUS and kill it.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple Network Cards
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:30:12 GMT
I am trying to set up my Linux box with two Ethernet cards (both use
ne.o). I am using Red Hat 5.2
My /etc/conf.modules file looks like:
alias eth0 ne.o
alias eth1 ne.o
options eth0 ne.o-0 io=0x240 irq=5
options eth1 ne.o-1 io=0x240 irq=9
This doesn't seem to work though. Any suggestions? I am using Linksys
Ether16 LAN Cards (ISA).
Shaf
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pcfs not recognized -sol7x86
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 16:03:12 GMT
hi
ideas welcome -
all of a sudden i cant mount my c-partition ( c0d0p0:1 or :c) anymore -
error says not a pcfs partition.
BUT IT IS !!!
i was even able to access it till recently -
and theres nothing i know of that i changed ???
where is the pcfs-driver located,
how to check it
and how to (re) install it?
couldn't find any posting related to this.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Robert Flemming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as a router
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:21:31 -0700
Rob Ferguson wrote:
> The routes all appear to be correct...ie., all 4 networks show up when I
> type route. Additionally, if I do a tracert from an NT machine to say,
> linux1, it eventually shows me the correct path through the router to the
> Linux machine (though it takes about 2 minutes to complete).
>
> Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
I bet you don't have IP_Forwarding turned on.
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
If it says 0 then
echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
You'll also want to figure out how to enable that at boot up. Under RH
it's in /etc/sysconfig/network set the option FORWARD_IPV4=yes and
you're good to go.
Robert
------------------------------
From: Mark DeVries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: help with invalid ICMP error
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:30:44 -0400
I have recently started getting to following error message whenever I
have a network connection established.
Jul 26 10:29:04 doppler kernel: 142.158.3.1 sent an invalid ICMP error
to a broadcast.
The error occurs frequently, every 5 minutes or so, whether I am doing
anything or not. Can somebody please tell me: 1. what is causing the
error, 2. how do I stop it, 3. is this a security problem, 4. If I leave
my network connection active, will it have any effect on the rest of the
network.
Any help you can give is appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Istvan Pal (paulus))
Subject: win9x fs mount under linux
Date: 27 Jul 1999 17:34:38 GMT
Hi,
how can I mount win9x shared (for NetWare Networks) directory under Linux?
Thank you very much for any help.
istvan
------------------------------
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with 2 netcards setup
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:44:40 GMT
>
> For the DSL box, since DSL is less than a megabit in most cases you
don't
> strictly need more than a 10-megabit connection to it. My preference
in
> this case:
>
> - A 10/100-megabit internal LAN, all 3 machines connected to a Netgear
> DS104 hub. Machines with PCI slots get 10/100-megabit cards,
ISA-only
> machines get the 3C509.
> - The Linux box configured with a second card, probably a 3C509 unless
the
> DSL connection came with a card as part of the deal, and set up as a
> router, firewall and masquerade host. You connect the DSL
modem/router
> to the second Ethernet card directly using a crossover cable, no hub
> is involved.
This is pretty much the situation I'm in. I've just installed Redhat 6
.0
kernal 2.2.5-15 And I'm in the process of trying to get it to
recognize my
second card.
Both cards are ne2000 compatible, one ISA and one PCI. During
installation it
found the PCI one but I'm trying to figure out how to get it to see my
second
card.
I've added append="ether=9,340,eth1" to lilo.conf (the right one), and
re-run lilo
but it still doesn't seem to even try to bring it up. The magic numbers
are the
IRQ and address of the 'missing' card.
I'm sure this is a newbie question, but how do I add the second card to
my list
of available devices?
My real email would be: ddubeau @t bigfoot . com (I
hate spam so
if you really want to send me something you can work out the address.)
------------------------------
From: "Jan Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masq with one NIC
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:44:26 GMT
> You could setup an aliased interface on the same NIC so you'd have eth0
> be your actual IP addresses eth0:0 be your internal net address. Then
> it's just a matter of getting ip_masq working right. It should work
> just dandy
Someone said that RoadRunner disconnected you if they "heard" broadcasts
from multiple MACS on a single modem. That could cause a problem aswell.
------------------------------
From: Eric LEMAITRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux as a router
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 19:36:11 +0200
Rob Ferguson a �crit :
> From each of the connected machines I can ping all 4 of the router's
> interfaces.
> Other than the router's interfaces, I can't ping machines on different
> networks...for example from GCC2 (192.168.4.51) I can't ping either HAL_9000
> (192.168.1.10) or linux1 (192.168.2.51).
Hi !
You lack IPChains to do masquerading (read IPMasquerading HOWTO), so that packets
may be freely passed from one network to any other in any way. you must add an
"ipchains" in Red-Hat-6 or "ipfwadm" in Red-Hat-5.2.
Kind of "ipchains -j MASQ -? forward -s (source) 192.168.10.0/24 -d (destination)
0.0.0.0/24" for each of your networks (check precise syntax in IPMasquerading
HOWTO).
Bye !
--
Responsable de formation pour les fili�res Internet et Linux
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Liu)
Subject: IP Masq with one NIC
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:05:44 -0700
Is it possible to setup IP masquerading with only one NIC? I have a
Pentium running RedHat 5.1, with only one available slot for an ethernet
card, connected to a hub with two other computers. The hub's uplink port
is plugged into a cable modem (TimeWarner Roadrunner). I can get the
linux box to use the cable modem fine, but I can't seem to get the route
table to work correctly. Every example I've seen uses PPP or a second
card, so I don't know if it's even possible with my setup.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
bye.
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: 2 ppp's / 2 isp accts
Date: 27 Jul 1999 12:57:32 -0500
Ron Bombard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Question: If I have 2 isp accounts, 2 modems, 2 telephones, 2 ppp
: interfaces (one for each isp acct)......
: is there a way to use the both at the same time. to say... balance the
: load between the two ppp interfaces....
I've never seen a multiple connection solution that didn't require
connections to the same ISP and some degree of ISP cooperation.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: Robert Flemming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Masq with one NIC
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 10:24:37 -0700
Edward Liu wrote:
>
> Is it possible to setup IP masquerading with only one NIC? I have a
> Pentium running RedHat 5.1, with only one available slot for an ethernet
> card, connected to a hub with two other computers. The hub's uplink port
> is plugged into a cable modem (TimeWarner Roadrunner). I can get the
> linux box to use the cable modem fine, but I can't seem to get the route
> table to work correctly. Every example I've seen uses PPP or a second
> card, so I don't know if it's even possible with my setup.
You could setup an aliased interface on the same NIC so you'd have eth0
be your actual IP addresses eth0:0 be your internal net address. Then
it's just a matter of getting ip_masq working right. It should work
just dandy
Robert
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Netgear FZ310TX...dropping packets?
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:00:12 GMT
I have a rh 6.0 system with a Netgear FA310TX installed, I am using the
tulip driver. Some very strange things have been happening with this
system. Sometimes when I reboot the network is completely down. Other
times when I ping a machine the first response will be like 1600 secs
and then each response after that will be 0.6 secs. (The pingee was up
the whole time.) At other times I will ping one machine w/ no response
wait a couple of minutes, ping again, and get normal responses.
nslookup just gives me blank line, almost as if it can't contact the
dns server, although I know it's really there and will listen to my
machine. Any ideas?
-rcollins
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Rob Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux as a router
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:21:25 -0500
I'm a new Linux user trying to learn and experiment as I go along...
Right now I'm trying to get a Linux box to act as a router. I've intsalled
4 NICs in a machine (called linux2) and gotten them configured as:
eth0 - 192.168.1.1
eth1 - 192.168.2.1
eth2 - 192.168.3.1
eth3 - 192.168.4.1
I also have several other machines connected to the different NICs as
follows:
WinNT4.0 server HAL_9000 - 192.168.1.10
Linux box linux1 - 192.168.2.51
WinNT4.0 WS GCC2 - 192.168.4.51
>From the router (linux2) I can ping all 4 interfaces, as well as all three
machines connected to the various interfaces.
>From each of the connected machines I can ping all 4 of the router's
interfaces.
Other than the router's interfaces, I can't ping machines on different
networks...for example from GCC2 (192.168.4.51) I can't ping either HAL_9000
(192.168.1.10) or linux1 (192.168.2.51).
The routes all appear to be correct...ie., all 4 networks show up when I
type route. Additionally, if I do a tracert from an NT machine to say,
linux1, it eventually shows me the correct path through the router to the
Linux machine (though it takes about 2 minutes to complete).
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
One more question... I'm trying to download files from the Linux Router
Project web site. From Internet Explorer on an NT machine, which I'm used
to using, I get access denied messages when I try to get to the FTP sites.
So I go in from linux1 using Netscape Navigator, which I'm unfamiliar with.
I get into the FTP site ok, but when I click on an archive, it gets
downloaded to the browser, ie., I get gibberish on the screen, rather than a
dialog asking where I want to save the file to. Right-clicking doesn't show
any "save file" option either. What am I doing wrong here? Do I have to
capture the text to the screen and then use some sort of uuencode utility or
what?
Thanks in advance for any help you can give this Linux newbie.
Rob
-----------== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeeds.com The Largest Usenet Servers in the World!
======== Over 73,000 Newsgroups = Including Dedicated Binaries Servers =======
------------------------------
From: rubias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS keeping connection open - HELP!
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 13:18:30 -0500
Not sure how much this will help, but you can run netstat as root with
'-p' as an option to see which processes are actually repsonsible for
the traffic. Won't solve your problem but may help pinpoint a little
closer where the problem is coming from.
Just out of curiosity, if you turn off your local name service and just
point everybody back out to your ISP's nameservers, does the problem
continue?
Is there a refresh setting in one of your zone files that fires up often
enough to keep the link alive?
Hope this helps :)
------------------------------
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with DSL and Linux
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 17:39:49 GMT
>
>
> For the DSL box, since DSL is less than a megabit in most cases you don't
> strictly need more than a 10-megabit connection to it. My preference in
> this case:
>
> - A 10/100-megabit internal LAN, all 3 machines connected to a Netgear
> DS104 hub. Machines with PCI slots get 10/100-megabit cards, ISA-only
> machines get the 3C509.
> - The Linux box configured with a second card, probably a 3C509 unless the
> DSL connection came with a card as part of the deal, and set up as a
> router, firewall and masquerade host. You connect the DSL modem/router
> to the second Ethernet card directly using a crossover cable, no hub
> is involved.
This is pretty much the situation I'm in. I've just installed Redhat 6 .0
kernal 2.2.5-15 And I'm in the process of trying to get it to recognize my
second card.
Both cards are ne2000 compatible, one ISA and one PCI. During installation it
found the PCI one but I'm trying to figure out how to get it to see my second
card.
I've added "append=9,340,eth1" to lilo.conf (the right one), and re-run lilo
but
it still doesn't seem to even try to bring it up.
I'm sure this is a newbie question, but how do I add the second card to my list
of
available devices?
My real email would be: ddubeau @t bigfoot.com (I hate spam so if you
really
want to send me something you can work out the address.)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NetBIOS names not recognized
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:11:44 GMT
Hello all,
I am running samba on a linux box using dhcp, but not using wins. I can
smbmount shares to Win98 clients on the network only using the -I
option with the clients IP address. nmblookup returns the client
successfully, and the client is in the browse list when I run smbclient
-L sambaserver. Is there any way to get the samba server to recognize
the Win98 clients NetBios names?
Thanks in advance,
JC
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: "Dylan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multiple Network Cards
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:02:06 +0200
1.
I don't think you can use the same io-address for both cards.
2.
Have you turned off the plug&play system.
3.
My conf.modules:
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=0x280,0x340 irq=10,11
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:7nkj9p$9si$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am trying to set up my Linux box with two Ethernet cards (both use
> ne.o). I am using Red Hat 5.2
>
> My /etc/conf.modules file looks like:
> alias eth0 ne.o
> alias eth1 ne.o
> options eth0 ne.o-0 io=0x240 irq=5
> options eth1 ne.o-1 io=0x240 irq=9
>
> This doesn't seem to work though. Any suggestions? I am using Linksys
> Ether16 LAN Cards (ISA).
>
> Shaf
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Roland Schatz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NetBIOS names not recognized
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 20:44:23 +0200
I don't know how to handle this with dhcp, but with a hosts-file I would
make an alias for the computer that is identical to the netbios-name and
use this name when running smbclient. Perhaps you can do something similar
to this on your dhcp-server.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am running samba on a linux box using dhcp, but not using wins. I can
> smbmount shares to Win98 clients on the network only using the -I
> option with the clients IP address. nmblookup returns the client
> successfully, and the client is in the browse list when I run smbclient
> -L sambaserver. Is there any way to get the samba server to recognize
> the Win98 clients NetBios names?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> JC
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
------------------------------
From: Alex Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ICMP Patch For Masquerading
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 19:45:16 +0100
George is right - you should not need the command you specified,
as long as this is compiled in, a setup such as:
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a -m -S 10.108.1.0/8 -D 0.0.0.0/0
should allow ICMP through.
Hope this helps
Alex
Daniel Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Thanks George but i've done this in all kernels from
: 2.0.35, *.36 and '37, however if i try to add a rule like
: ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -P icmp -S $LOCLNET -D 0/0
: the following error is returned
: ipfwadm:masquerading not allowed with protocol ICMP
: What I would like to know is if i'm doing something wrong?
: George Georgakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
: news:01becf8e$68cfb120$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
:> You don't need a patch, it should already be in there. Enable
:>
:> CONFIG_IP_MASQUERADE_ICMP=y
:>
:> under Networking Options and recompile.
:>
:> George
:>
:> Daniel Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
:> <7mn27h$7lo$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
:> > hi all
:> >
:> > Does anyone know where I can get the ICMP patch for kernel 2.0.36 to
:> allow
:> > masq. pinging ?
:> >
:> > Thanks in advance
:> >
:> >
:> >
------------------------------
From: "Leonid Fedotov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Re: sendmail and autoreply.
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:11:52 GMT
Bill,
Thanks for info.
I install it, but have problems:
Ihave the following in .forward file:
\oracle,"|/usr/bin/vacation oracle"
but, when i try to send anything to oracle, I have not auto reply, but:
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
"|/usr/bin/vacation oracle"
(expanded from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
sh: vacation not available for sendmail programs
554 "|/usr/bin/vacation oracle"... Service unavailable
Any ideas?
Thanks
Leonid
Bill A Bonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think that there is a "vacation" program that you can use. I think
> procmail can do the same thing. You should post in the
> comp.mail.sendmail, try to avoid cross posting....
>
> Leonid Fedotov wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Could anybody point me the right direction?
> >
> > I need setup autoreply for some of our users.
> > Something like old "vacation"
> > How can I do this with current version?
> > Redhat 5.2
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Leonid
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
