Linux-Networking Digest #29, Volume #11 Mon, 3 May 99 19:13:45 EDT
Contents:
NIC driver (Chad Dailey)
Multitech ZPW modem (sm)
Linux http and ftp downloads much faster than NT (Garrick Dabbs,USAF)
Multiple IP (jean-sebastien milliere)
Re: samba not seen in Network Neighborhood ("Earl W. Harlow")
kppp: connect before login & keep connection ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Plip connection between FreeBSD & Linux (shin)
Madge PCI 16/4 driver ? (pher)
how to mount samba shares? (Neil)
Fault tolerance in Linux (disk writes) ("David L. Courtney")
Re: Linux http and ftp downloads much faster than NT (Thomas Zajic)
Re: Linux UDP ports above 61000 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner? (Ingo Ciechowski)
Losing internal mail when the Internet is lost (Eric Carlson)
nmbd giving wrong results ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Where to Download ppp-2.3.7? ("Peggy Chan")
Re: diald ("Ian Lunam")
HELP - 3c589/Thinkpad 770X and ethernet random behavior... ("Sunil P. Khatri")
Re: Multiple IP (Michael Balderas)
Re: ipportfw problems ("Tobin Solkey")
Re: Linux UDP ports above 61000 (Robert Lynch)
Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...try this .... ("Marco Tephlant")
Re: PPP with PCMCIA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chad Dailey)
Subject: NIC driver
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 18:55:48 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
Please forgive me if I have chosen the wrong NG to post this question;
if you know of a more appropriate forum, I would be happy to know what
that might be.
I have a generic question related to a driver development issue. I am
wondering what the degree of difficulty would be to add full-duplex
functionality to an existing NIC driver. The OS/driver in question
are proprietary pieces written for a specific application. We are
searching for feasibility information to ask our vendor to add this
feature.
I am speaking in terms of general programming difficulty, and possible
effect on existing functionality. I understand that every situation
will have unique requirements, but what I am searching for are answers
of the "SWAG" variety.
Thanks in advance,
Chad Dailey
------------------------------
From: sm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multitech ZPW modem
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 22:35:38 +0800
I'm trying to get a PPP connection through a Multitech modem MT5634ZPW
supplied with an HP Pavilion 8215. At the installation, Linux RedHat 5.2
don't recognize it. Setserial shows that the UART is unkown. If I force
it to 16550A it doesn't help at the initialization with Minicom (no OK
return) and I can't have the line before dialing.
Thanks for some help.
------------------------------
From: Garrick Dabbs,USAF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux http and ftp downloads much faster than NT
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 13:52:06 GMT
Hey all,
I have a dual boot Linux/NT box. When I am browsing both my intranet and the
internet in Linux, my download times are MANY times faster than when I am in
NT. Is there a way I can tune the NT tcp/ip stack to perform as well as
Linux?
Thanks ,
Garrick Dabbs
--
Please don't take away my Linux box!
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jean-sebastien milliere)
Subject: Multiple IP
Date: 03 May 1999 22:46:05 GMT
Hi there,
I want to have multiple different IP on the same ethernet
card. (ex. 10.254.252.10, 10.254.252.11, etc...)
I know it's possible, but how ??
Thanks in advance,
js
------------------------------
From: "Earl W. Harlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba not seen in Network Neighborhood
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 15:51:16 -0500
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I too, am relatively new to Linux networking, but I have been able to successfully
set my Samba server up on Windows 95 (Win '98 seems to be another question...).
<p>Have you checked your smb.conf file in the /etc directory (redhat anyway)?
You need to set some parameters there to tell the Linux box whether or
not you want it to accept NT Domain logons. You may also set the
name of the workgroup in smb.conf. Additionally, i had to activate
some entries for user and public directories to become available.
The SMB-Howto was a lot of help.
<br>
<br>
<p>Darin Beckett wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>A newbie with common problem.....
<p>I can ping either machine but I cannot access or see the linux(RH 5.0)
<br>server from
<br>Win 95 machine (I don't know how or if I can 'see' the win 95 machine
from
<br>Linux). I am new to Linux and Networking and I'm a bit stuck.
I get this
<br>message when i log onto windows: "No domain server was available to
<br>validate your password. You may not be able to gain access to
some network
<br>resources".
<p>smbstaus output reads:
<p>samba version 1.9.17p4
<br>service uid gid pid
machine
<p>no locked files
<p>I have not been able to set the domain up and the machine is
<br>[root@localhost /root]#.
<p>/etc/hosts output reads:
<br>127.0.0.1
localhost.localdomain
<br>192.168.1.254
harry.lightfoot.com *Linux box*
<br>192.168.1.2
mollie.lightfoot.com *win 95*
<p>I can telnet to the IP address 192.168.1.254 but not the domain
<br>'harry.lightfoot.com.
<p>smbclient //harry/root -U root output reads:
<p>added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0
<br>unknown socket option tcp_nodelay
<br>server time 'etc'
<br>timezone 'etc'
<br>password:
<br>Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[UNIX] Server=[Samba 1.9.17p4]
<br>security=user
<br>smb:\>
<p>My guess, for what it's worth, is that the Domain/DNS need(s) to be
set up
<br>somewhere.
<p>Any ideas?
<p>tia
<p>darin</blockquote>
</html>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.kde,alt.os.linux.dial-up,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: kppp: connect before login & keep connection
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 15:02:45 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I set up kppp to make a connection automatically, i.e. without having
to start it and click "connect"? This should be done either automatically
after logging in via kdm, or better yet, before logging in (when kdm starts).
Also, how can I set up kppp (or use other tools) to keep the connection alive?
(My ISP kicks me out after a certain time of inactivity.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (shin )
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Plip connection between FreeBSD & Linux
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 13:26:13 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi,
i have a 2 machine n/w - comprising a linuix (2.0.35 kernel) i386 box
connected to a NT box via ethernet . I wish to add my FreeBSD notebook
(2.2.8 ) to this networkvia PLIP but have so far failed miserably -
and yes I probably don't know what I am doing :-)
I'm usng a 192.168.0.x network thus:
Linux 192.168.0.3
NT 192.168.0.1
FreeBSD 192.168.0.2
Linux and NT communicatre just fine.
I have compiled PLIP support as a module have loaded the plip modules
on Linux.
I set the plip interface on Linux :
ifconfig plip1 linix pointopoint freeBSD arp up
and on the freebsd I do:
ifconfig lp0 FreeBSD linux
I have a laplink parellel cable between linux and freebsd. And both
machines have appropriate entries in /etc/hosts.
I guess I need to add some sort of route - and did
route add 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
however netstat -r does show the plip interface with a route to it.
Actually something has jsut occurred to me ((right this moment) - I
have the same IP address for the linux ethernet and Plip port -
presumably this is not good. Ok i'm going to and try changing that.
Menawhile if anyone can offer any pointers I'd be grateful - i'll let
u know if it works after using different addresses for eth0 and plip1
on Linux. What sort of route format do I need to use?
TIA
shin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pher)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Madge PCI 16/4 driver ?
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 14:43:50 GMT
I'm trying to install Linux on my office PC that has a Madge PCI 16/4
BM Mk2 Token Ring adapter. I found an alpha driver from Madge that
works with the 2.0.29 kernel. The card is recognized, but does not
work. The command 'route' gives the route but does not close, I have
to hit ctrl-c. Pinging localhost is ok, but no other PCs. IP-address,
netmask and gateway are set as for Windows NT (where everything
works). The IBM driver does not work (resource busy, it says).
In what direction should I search ? I've asked Madge for a new driver,
but from what I've seen in Dejanews and these ng, there is not much
hope.
Thank you
pher
------------------------------
From: Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: how to mount samba shares?
Date: 3 May 1999 16:31:06 -0500
I know when I had Linux running before I used to be able to mount shares
on Windows computer on mount points, like /mnt/quark/c and /mnt/quark/d
just like I can mount other drives and partitions. But for the life of
me I can't remember how or find it in the docs. I also remember I could
put lines in fstab so I could mount the shares by using the disk mount
tool in X. But now all I can figure out to do is use the smbclient
program to get an ftp like terminal interface.
So what's the trick? I give up!
--
------------------------------
From: "David L. Courtney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Fault tolerance in Linux (disk writes)
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 16:01:30 GMT
Hi.
Can someone point me to something to read about this? Novell has their
"hotfix" for errors in writing to disk...does Linux have something
similar? Thanks in advance.
David
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Zajic)
Subject: Re: Linux http and ftp downloads much faster than NT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 16:06:23 GMT
On Mon, 03 May 1999 13:52:06 GMT, Garrick Dabbs wrote:
> Hey all,
> I have a dual boot Linux/NT box. When I am browsing both my intranet and the
> internet in Linux, my download times are MANY times faster than when I am in
> NT. Is there a way I can tune the NT tcp/ip stack to perform as well as
> Linux?
Nope, you�ve just discovered a Fact Of Life[tm]. Linux simply has the better
TCP/IP stack, and this is only one if its advantages. Is there any particular
reason for doing your internet/intranet browsing on NT?
Thomas
--
=--- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria ---=
=-- "It is not easy to cut through a human head with a hacksaw." M.C. --=
=-- Posted with Free Agent 1.11/32 running on Linux 2.0.36/Wine-990226 --=
=--- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at ---=
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Linux UDP ports above 61000
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 20:40:13 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > My question: what's up with the UDP port numbers above 61000? Is this
> > a blackdown problem, something with the way I've got my Linux
> > machine configured, or what?
>
> This was pointed out by somebody some time ago and I also explored this
> a bit. It affects TCP ports, as is readily verified by using
> ServerSocket in your code.
>
> I wrote a "C" program which demos this, showing that it is not an oddity
> of Java, but the OS (?).
I think Paul Black got it with IP Masquerading. A look through the source
shows these #defs in linux/include/net/ip_masq.h:
/*
* Linux ports don't normally get allocated above 32K.
* I used an extra 4K port-space
*/
#define PORT_MASQ_BEGIN 61000
#define PORT_MASQ_END (PORT_MASQ_BEGIN+4096)
So unless you're willing to recompile your kernel, ports above 61000
are probably out.
For a quick intro to IP masquerading, see
http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.65.html
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Ciechowski)
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.msdos,de.comm.software.misc,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 23:16:03 +0200
Hallo zusammen,
wer kennt ein Programm, das mir Zugriff auf einen DOS-Rechner �ber dessen
serielle Schnittstelle erm�glicht - w�hrend andere Programme auf dem
Rechner laufen?
von mir ben�tigte Funktionen sind:
(a) Betrachten von Verzeichnissen auf dem DOS-System (DOS-Befehl DIR)
(b) Abrufen von Textdateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl type)
(c) L�schen von Dateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl delete)
Ich w�re ggf. auch geneigt, die Entwicklung in Auftrag zu geben...
Ingo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Eric Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Losing internal mail when the Internet is lost
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 11:28:04 -0500
I have a Linux box running Slackware 3.4 which handles my IP
masquerading and DSL connection. I use another Slack 3.4 box, with an
internal IP of 192.168.*.*, as my e-mail server. I use Fetchmail to grab
mail from an external mail server for our organization which is then
stored on the internal mail server for use by workstations.
The problem is this:
When I lose connection to the internet everyone on my internal network
is unable to get mail from the internal mail server. The client used on
the workstations is Netscape 4.5 under Windows NT using the mail
notifier to check for mail. When I lose the internet the little blue
"pinwheel" freezes in the corner and a dialog box asking for a password
comes up. I also notice that it take alot longer to telnet into the mail
server at this time too. But I've increased the timeout for the notifier
and that still doesn't solve it.
Has anyone have a solution, idea, or ever dealt with a similar problem
before? If you need more info on the situation I'll post more.
Thanks.
Eric Carlson
MIS Dept
Midstate Manufacturing
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: nmbd giving wrong results
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 17:44:42 GMT
Ok everyone. I am trying to configure my Samba server, but my nmbd doesn't
seem to be working. If I do a "nmblookup -B CLIENT_A '*'" or a "nmblookup -B
CLIENT_B '*'", I get the correct IP address. Howevaer, when I do a
""nmblookup - B SAMBA_CLIENT '*'", I get the WRONG IP address. What I get is:
Sending queries to 0.0.0.0
90.0.0.1 *<00>
90.0.0.1 is NOT the IP address of my samba server. It is 90.0.0.10. Why is it
giving me the wrong IP address? I checked my lmhosts and hosts file and it
lists my Linux machine is 90.0.0.10. What the hell?
"nmblookup -B LinuxMachine __SAMBA__" yields a similar result:
Sending queries to 0.0.0.0
90.0.0.1 __SAMBA__<00>
I checked the "Diagnosing Samba" faq, but it wasn't much help other than
"there's somethign wrong with your nmbd client". I am loading nmbd by the
following line:
daemon nmbd -D -n 90.0.0.10 -H /etc/lmhosts
- Steve
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Peggy Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Where to Download ppp-2.3.7?
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 00:37:19 +0800
hi , can anyone give the web/ftp site?
rgds
------------------------------
From: "Ian Lunam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diald
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 09:12:33 +1200
Yes.
Winshit products occationally send out a little bit of a "hey, I'm here.
Anybody wanna talk?" type message. This is interpreted by diald as network
traffic, as you would expect, and causes it to start up the link.
To get around this you put in a simple firewall rule to disable forwarding
of these messages. There is a specific pair of ports, the number of which I
can't remember, but you disable UDP packets on them. I think they were 137
and 139 but I'm not sure.
I wish I was at home, because it's in my firewall rules on my linux box
there. I'll look it up and post it tonight sometime, if I remember.
Ian
Keith Wright wrote in message <7gl0gp$5fc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have another question. The network keeps coming up (like every 10
minutes
>or so during the day)... and I don't have any browsers or other TCP/IP
>related applications running on the other computers (or maybe I do and just
>don't know it... or maybe Bill Gates has set up my Win95 computer to
>automatically send him info on my system periodically!!).
>
>Has anyone experienced this before?
>
>Thanks again,
>Keith
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Sunil P. Khatri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: HELP - 3c589/Thinkpad 770X and ethernet random behavior...
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 22:18:43 +0000
I am running 2.0.36, pcmcia version 3.0.9, on a Thinkpad 770X
with a 3c589 network card.
When I insert the network card, I sometimes get a good ethernet
connection (about 50% of the time) and the rest of the time, the
ethernet initialization does not get done.
So I ran the ethernet initialization manually, using the following
sequence of commands.
ifconfig eth0 24.7.91.103 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
route add -net 24.7.91.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
route add default gw 24.7.91.1 eth0
Again, about 50% of the times, when I do a "netstat -r", the
netstat command seems to hang and does not mention the default
route. Whenever I get a good ethernet connection, the netstat
command mentions a default route
I used to get "kernel: i82365: infinite loop in interrupt handler"
messages in my /var/log/messages, perhaps these are related to the
problem..
Can anyone help? I am completely at a loss trying to understand this..
Sunil
------------------------------
From: mike*no*spam*@yourhelpdesk.com (Michael Balderas)
Subject: Re: Multiple IP
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 22:20:43 GMT
Take a look at http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Alias.html
Mike
On 03 May 1999 22:46:05 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jean-sebastien
milliere) wrote:
>
>Hi there,
>
>I want to have multiple different IP on the same ethernet
>card. (ex. 10.254.252.10, 10.254.252.11, etc...)
>I know it's possible, but how ??
>
>Thanks in advance,
> js
------------------------------
From: "Tobin Solkey" <Tobin Solkey@Cascade Digital Inc.>
Subject: Re: ipportfw problems
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 09:56:18 -0700
I tried all of this too.... I eventually solved the problem by using redir.
The redir program works great. Is easy to use (I use it in the --inetd
form). Look for it here -
http://users.qual.net/~sammy/hacks/
-Tobin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7g6ti2$u4n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Hi
>
>I have without any luck been searching deja news for an answer to my
problem,
>which seems, with minor variations, to be more or less common.
>
>I am running kernel 2.0.36 and is using ipmasquerading, which BTW work
works
>just fine. I now want to use ipportfw to make my web-server visible to the
>rest of the net.
>
>Here's what I have done in cronoligical order: - I have patched the
kernel -
>I have run "make config" and enabled ipportfw - I have compiled the
>ipportfw.c file - I have recompiled the kernel and the modules and
installed
>the modules and the new kernel. - Rebooted the new kernel
>
>Everything without problems.
>
>Then I have tried
>"ipportfw -A -t130.xxx.yyy.zzz/80 -R 192.168.1.10/80"
>and it doesn't work,
>
>/unless/ I run a "tcpdump host 130.xxx.yyy.zzz" on the firewall.
>While the tcpdump is running the portforwarding works, but when i stop the
>tcpdump the portforwarding stops too. So when I try to find out why things
>doesn't work, they work and when I stop looking they stop working.
>
>What is happening and what am I doing wrong ?
>
>TIA
>Lars
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 14:54:57 -0700
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Linux UDP ports above 61000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > My question: what's up with the UDP port numbers above 61000? Is this
> > > a blackdown problem, something with the way I've got my Linux
> > > machine configured, or what?
> >
> > This was pointed out by somebody some time ago and I also explored this
> > a bit. It affects TCP ports, as is readily verified by using
> > ServerSocket in your code.
> >
> > I wrote a "C" program which demos this, showing that it is not an oddity
> > of Java, but the OS (?).
>
> I think Paul Black got it with IP Masquerading. A look through the source
> shows these #defs in linux/include/net/ip_masq.h:
>
> /*
> * Linux ports don't normally get allocated above 32K.
> * I used an extra 4K port-space
> */
>
> #define PORT_MASQ_BEGIN 61000
> #define PORT_MASQ_END (PORT_MASQ_BEGIN+4096)
>
> So unless you're willing to recompile your kernel, ports above 61000
> are probably out.
That might explain the observation by Juergen Kreileder that he couldn't
"reproduce the problem with 2.2.x kernels." I checked this myself and
found the same thing. However, my 2.0.36 kernel (where I see it) it is
a stock RedHat RPM install. My 2.2.3 install is a custom compile, and I
left out IP Masquerading because I don't use it.
Nice to have a riddle solved.
Bob L.
> For a quick intro to IP masquerading, see
> http://members.home.net/ipmasq/ipmasq-HOWTO-1.65.html
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.best.com/~rmlynch/
------------------------------
From: "Marco Tephlant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...try this ....
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 22:27:58 +0100
Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Well, I've had no trouble at all with 3c905B-TX cards (got 'em in 4
> machines, three of which run RedHat 5.2 [1 is dedicated Linux-only, the
> other two are occasionally used in Linux]),
I have 3c509's in two machines, one works fine in linux&windows with plug
and play enabled, the other works in windows but not in linux!
I'm considering disabling plug and play to see if it will work but will this
mess up the card in windows?
Cheers
--
Marco
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: PPP with PCMCIA
Date: 3 May 1999 17:08:52 GMT
On Sat, 01 May 1999 14:47:14 -0700, Nathan Tawil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm trying to set up a PPP connection through a PC card modem (a Pretec
56k, not a WinModem) on my Dell laptop. The modem works under Windows.
Under Linux, I've got problems up to my ears.
i did too, which is why i gave my Pretec pcmcia modem away...
>First, Linux doesn't seem to recognize the modem. I get an I/O error when
I enter "setserial /dev/ttys2 ...." (The modem shows up on COM3 under
Windows.) I've tried to test the modem with minicom, but I can't quite
figure out how to make this work.
i got it to work by setting a larger timeout value in the ppp-on script...
the modem would work OK when receiving data, but seriously barfed when
sending data out...
>Is this a PCMCIA configuration problem, or a PPP problem, or both? Any advice?
get a Viking 56K v.90 pcmcia modem... you'll be a lot happier
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
