Linux-Networking Digest #31, Volume #11 Mon, 3 May 99 22:13:35 EDT
Contents:
Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
innd ("Doug Pitek")
Re: ERROR 205 -- DNS name lookup failure. ("JJ (UK)")
Re: ifconfig errors... (Clifford Kite)
Re: Multitech ZPW modem (sm)
Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network (wyatt)
Re: Trouble connecting to ISP using PPP (Internet Real Estate)
Re: 3C905B-TX Drivers? ("Dr. Buchacher Anton")
Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network (Ron)
IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet (Wonkoo Kim)
Re: HELP!!!!! 3C509B - RedHat 5.2 NOT WORKING!!! (Mark)
Problems with Netscape insisting on a network connection ("Phill Edwards")
Re: kppp: connect before login & keep connection (TARogue)
Re: Where to Download ppp-2.3.7? (jason)
Re: RH5.2 and D-link (David Kennedy)
rlogind: Out of ptys. (Luc Lalonde)
FS:BlackBox SX100 Ultimate LAN/WAN/ISP Toy (GbyTheSea)
Samba and Win '98 ("Earl W. Harlow")
Re: Valid IP addresses for home network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Where to Download ppp-2.3.7? (Clifford Kite)
Re: Installing via direct cable connection (DB7654321)
gigabit ethernet (Lance Miller)
Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network (Amir Malik)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.msdos,de.comm.software.misc,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 01:22:55 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Ciechowski) writes:
>
> Hallo zusammen,
>
> wer kennt ein Programm, das mir Zugriff auf einen DOS-Rechner �ber dessen
> serielle Schnittstelle erm�glicht - w�hrend andere Programme auf dem
> Rechner laufen?
>
> von mir ben�tigte Funktionen sind:
> (a) Betrachten von Verzeichnissen auf dem DOS-System (DOS-Befehl DIR)
> (b) Abrufen von Textdateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl type)
> (c) L�schen von Dateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl delete)
>
>
> Ich w�re ggf. auch geneigt, die Entwicklung in Auftrag zu geben...
>
Zugriff auf den DOS-Rechner bekommst Du, wenn Du die Ein- und Ausgabe von
COMMAND �ber die Schittstelle f�hrst. (COMMAND /? hilft Dir)
Da DOS kein Multitasking kann, kannst Du aber keine anderen Programme mehr
auf dem Rechner ausf�hren. (Auch kann man mit der Tastatur und dem
Bildschirm nichts mehr anfangen) Eine M�glichkeit w�re da ein Multitasking
Aufsatz, wie er z.B. bei Caldera OpenDOS dabei ist.
Andreas
------------------------------
From: "Doug Pitek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: innd
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 20:00:58 -0400
Hey all,
I'm new to linux, but I think I am doing pretty good.. I got apache,
sendmail, ip masquerading and squid working.. I am now working on inn and
dns
I am getting an 502 You are not in my access file. Goodbye. when I try to
connect to my linux with a news clients.. Any info on this would be great..
Thank
dp
------------------------------
From: "JJ (UK)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ERROR 205 -- DNS name lookup failure.
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 19:15:59 +0100
Crossposted-To: comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows,uk.comp.os.linux
If you can get on to ANY other internet site then it's not your system that
is having the problem.
The probable cause is that the site you are trying to connect to no longer
exists.
Second possibility is that the DNS (Domain Name Server - the computer that
tranlates the URL address into an IP address, rather like tranlating a PO
Box number to an actual street address) is either not up to date or is
faulty.
None of which are caused by you or can be fixed by you.
Just shrug your shoulders and move on...
JJ (UK)
Matt wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I keep on getting this error message when browsing a number of sites
>is there something wrong with my setup or the internet itself ?
>
>ERROR 205 -- DNS name lookup failure. Please contact your system
> administrator.
>
>Many thanks
>
>Matt
>
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ifconfig errors...
Date: 3 May 1999 18:53:33 -0500
Sandeep Singh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I confess; I did not read all the docs. Can you tell me what I am missing?
: Everything works just fine; I can telnet, ftp, http etc. But I still have
: these errors...
Strangely, the package that ifconfig comes in, Net-tools - probably up
to version 1.50 or more by now.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: sm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multitech ZPW modem
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 08:13:57 +0800
Thanks ;-(
Lew Pitcher wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 1999 22:35:38 +0800, sm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm trying to get a PPP connection through a Multitech modem MT5634ZPW
> >supplied with an HP Pavilion 8215. At the installation, Linux RedHat 5.2
> >don't recognize it. Setserial shows that the UART is unkown. If I force
> >it to 16550A it doesn't help at the initialization with Minicom (no OK
> >return) and I can't have the line before dialing.
> >Thanks for some help.
>
> Sorry, but you're SOL.
>
> According to the Multitech site (http://www.multitech.com/)
> the MT5634ZPW is a "unique controllerless design" which
> "uses your personal computer's processing power to handle many
> communication functions normally done by the modem" (see
> http://www.multitech.com/support/manuals/82063901.pdf).
>
> What you've got is generically called a "WinModem", and will only work
> with the proper software. At this time, there is no manufacturer of
> WinModems that have either ported their driver software to Linux or released
> the specifications to permit others to craft a driver. What you've got is
> so much sand, and (unless you collect useless pieces of hardware) should be
> scrapped and replaced with a real modem.
>
> Sorry... :-(
>
> Lew Pitcher
> System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
> Toronto Dominion Bank
>
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> (Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:20:05 GMT
Thanks again Larry, and others who responded.
This evening I powered the systems up, convinced that I had a bad cable
(nothing else made sense).
Of course, after I swapped the cables and powered everything up, it all worked
just fine (I'm sending this from my Win box through IP Masq on Linux... seems
much 'snappier', somehow) ;-)
My only explanation is, since I didn't physically change anything, that one of
the cables may have an intermittent connection. At this point everything's
working, so I'll push ahead, order some spares, and be thankful for the
current phase of the moon.
thanks again, folks,
Ron
Larry Brasfield wrote:
> A NIC-to-NIC connection with a straight
> cable should not work. You would need
> a cross-over cable (1/2 <-> 3/6) for that.
>
> [snip]
>
> --
> --Larry Brasfield
> Above opinions may be mine alone.
> (Humans may reply at unundered [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 15:36:54 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Internet Real Estate)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Trouble connecting to ISP using PPP
Double check and make sure the IRQ setting on your modem (jumpers?) are
set correctly for the com port you are using.
Edward
> > I'm having establishing a connection with my ISP using PPP. I can make
> > the connection, but my modem keeps hanging up on me, and I'm not sure
> > why. The problem seems to have something to do with PAP
> > authentication.
**
====================================
Internet Real Estate
"Sell Your Home Yourself - And Save Thousands!"
http://www.internet-real-estate.com/
------------------------------
From: "Dr. Buchacher Anton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3C905B-TX Drivers?
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 20:13:04 +0200
I want to install SuSE Linux 6.1, possibly over my LAN. So I need
Information on how to install the driver for the network card. The machine
where I want to install Linux has a "3Com Fast EtherLink XL 10/100Mb TX
Ethernet NIC (3C905B-TX)". AKAs are: Cyclone, Boomerang, EtherLink III XL,
3C905B-TX.
The Ethernet-HOWTO of LDP says that "the support for the Cyclone 'B'
revision was only recently added. To use this card with older v2.0 kernels,
you must obtain the updated 3c59x.c driver from Donald's site at:
Vortex-Page <http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html>
Actually, I don't need that update because SuSE Linux 6.1 has Kernel 2.2.5,
do I?
But http://support.3com.com/infodeli/inotes/techtran/e36e_5ea.htm says:
"3Com does not provide Linux drivers. Third party drivers are available on
the web:
1. The URL is http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
Note: Once on that web page click on:
ftp://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/linux/drivers/3c59x.c to view
the source code"
3Com's latest driver is the EtherDisk 4.01b Release at:
http://support.3com.com/infodeli/tools/nic/3c90x401b.htm
At the moment I'm using the driver (it has been installed by a technician
while I wasn't at home and so nobody knows exactly what he did) from the
"EtherDisk (R) Diskette for the 3C90X Fast EtherLink XL/EtherLink XL Bus
Master NIC Family" under Windows98, which is so far buggy that BIOS can't
activate the NIC after a reboot. So I always have to quit Windows and press
the Reset button. But that's another problem.
So do I need the 3c95x.c driver or which driver can I use?
And how do I install it (before installing Linux, while installing Linux,
after installing Linux,...)?
You can also answer in German or French (though German and English are
preferable!).
I was delighted if you could also reply this E-mail to me (cuz I usually
don't have the time to read all the newsgroups to which I've sent this
mail).
Thank you very much.
Clemens Buchacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JAGA Corporations
www.myfreeoffice.com/jaga
--
OpenSource - join the revolution
------------------------------
From: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:25:24 GMT
Thanks again Larry, and others who responded.
This evening I powered the systems up, convinced that I had a bad cable
(nothing else made sense).
Of course, after I swapped the cables and powered everything up, it all worked
just fine (I'm sending this from my Win box through IP Masq on Linux... seems
much 'snappier', somehow) ;-)
My only explanation is, since I didn't physically change anything, that one of
the cables may have an intermittent connection. At this point everything's
working, so I'll push ahead, order some spares, and be thankful for the
current phase of the moon.
thanks again, folks,
Ron
Larry Brasfield wrote:
> A NIC-to-NIC connection with a straight
> cable should not work. You would need
> a cross-over cable (1/2 <-> 3/6) for that.
>
> [snip]
> --
> --Larry Brasfield
> Above opinions may be mine alone.
> (Humans may reply at unundered [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
------------------------------
From: Wonkoo Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 20:24:44 -0400
I have a Linux (RH 5.2) box that is set up for an IP-masquerading
firewall server for PCs of my home LAN to share internet access.
Everything works well. Now I want to block any remote telnet
sessions from outside to the Linux box, while allowing ftp or
http sessions to the Linux box. How can I set this up?
(I think I need some ipfwadm rules for this.)
Thanks.
//-------------------------------------------------------------------
// Wonkoo Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP!!!!! 3C509B - RedHat 5.2 NOT WORKING!!!
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 19:22:05 GMT
Are you confident your distribution for RH 5.2 is ok?
Corey Ewing wrote:
>
> I recently upgraded two machines from RedHat Version 5.0 to 5.2 and I
> cannot for the life of me get the network cards working. Both machines
> have a 3Com 509B. I have disabled PNP in the BIOS as well as on the
> cards themself. I cannot seem to find any other solutions to the
> problem in this group. One interesting thing is that every time I
> install 5.2, when the machines boot up, it cannot find the module
> dependencies. I have tested the cards in other distributions (OpenLinux
> 1.3, Slackware) and they work fine. PLEASE HELP!!
------------------------------
From: "Phill Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,linux.redhat
Subject: Problems with Netscape insisting on a network connection
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 10:32:09 +1000
With both Netscape 4.51 and 4.07 I find that if I have entries in the mail
server or news server fields in Edit->Preferences a dial-up gets initiated
by diald when starting Netscape. Then Netscape freezes up until the dial-up
has been initiated. If the modem is turned off it stays frozen and the only
way to close Netscape is to kill it.
I have of course made sure that the start and home pages are not "external"
so that's not the problem.
I've tried installing bind and dns cacheing but that just initiates a
dial-up as soon as named starts in the init scripts which is even worse.
Someone has suggested that I make my SMTP server be localhost rather than my
ISP's SMTP server. Could this be the problem? What will I do about setting
the news server?
Surely there's an easy way to stop this? Is it a general problem that people
have had with Netscape or is it just me?
TIA,
-- Phill --
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (TARogue)
Crossposted-To: comp.windows.x.kde,alt.os.linux.dial-up,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: kppp: connect before login & keep connection
Date: 3 May 1999 18:22:53 GMT
On Mon, 03 May 1999 15:02:45 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
scribbled something about kppp: connect before login & keep connection:
>How can I set up kppp to make a connection automatically, i.e. without having
>to start it and click "connect"? This should be done either automatically
>after logging in via kdm, or better yet, before logging in (when kdm starts).
>
>Also, how can I set up kppp (or use other tools) to keep the connection alive?
>(My ISP kicks me out after a certain time of inactivity.)
with a redhat-type system, check in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0 for ONBOOT=yes
that line initiates the dial-up connection at boot time. to keep
connected, set up a cron job (crontab -e) to access a remote server
every x minutes. mine is set as root to set my local clock to the same
time as the remote servers clock every 15 minutes.
15 * * * * rdate -s remote.server.com
--
TARogue (t o m (at) t a r o g u e . n e t)
plug #1 - http://www.tarogue.net/
plug #2 - http://www.tarogue.net/goth.html
plug #3 - http://www.tarogue.net/n.g.resource.html
Check 'em all out!
------------------------------
From: jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where to Download ppp-2.3.7?
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 14:27:19 -0400
Peggy Chan wrote:
>
> hi , can anyone give the web/ftp site?
>
> rgds
ftp://cs.anu.edu.au/pub/software/ppp/
-jason
(to reply via email, make the appropriate substitution in my email address)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kennedy)
Subject: Re: RH5.2 and D-link
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 17:33:18 GMT
which model? What type of information are you after?
I have two dlink dfe-500tx's running fine.
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:27:39 -0400, Dale Einarson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello all,
> Does anyone know about the d-link adapters? I am getting 2.
>I emailed dlink tech and sales staff an received <<NO>> response.
>I just what to know if they have the same chip sets as there
>"packet adapters".
>
>I am getting a combo for the BNC and one PCI 100T.
>
>
>
>PS: If you know of a better place to forward this question please
> let me know ( no vulgarities please)
>
>(I have looked on 3.43Mb of web pages and no info)
>
>Thank you all for you time,
>cheers!
>dale =8{>
>
>
>--
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dale Einarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Systems Manager CFD Lab, Concordia University
>Phone (514) 848 4196 Fax (514) 848 8601
------------------------------
From: Luc Lalonde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rlogind: Out of ptys.
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 18:27:39 +0000
Hello,
I'm having problems with rlogin on my machine running Redhat 6.0. I get
the following error when I try:
rlogind: Out of ptys.
rlogin: connection closed.
There does not seem to be any reference to this problem anywhere in the
lists...
Thanks Luc.
PS Please reply to the following address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GbyTheSea)
Subject: FS:BlackBox SX100 Ultimate LAN/WAN/ISP Toy
Date: 3 May 1999 18:28:26 GMT
Part#SW382A New in the box...No cables or manuals..
24 in X 48 out 2 pair RJ-45
List$2995.00
Price:Best Offer Must Sell...
Greg Wilkerson
v:410-641-8622
f:410-641-6850
Mastercard/Visa/Discover
http://www.blackbox.com
Page 388 of Blackbox catalog
Quote from blackbox website:
"Powerful, affordable network management and fault tolerance for corporations
and ISPs."
-Centralize control of your LAN resources of ISP equipment
-Protocal independant
The SX100 is designed for LAN resource sharing. Controlled directly from a PC,
this protocal-indepent, non-blocking switch handles cross-connections at the
physical layer. Plus it enables analyer equipment to quicky and easily moved
around your network-eliminating the need for manual intervention.
Each SX100 is certified for use with Network Associates' Distributed Sniffer
System (DSS).
An Sx100 offers fallback switching for ISPs enabling instant fault tolerance to
communication servers, routers, and CSU/DSUs-switch from faulty ports or units
to spare ports or units. Inaddition end users can seamlessly reconfigure their
their communication equipment.
ISPs can immediately switch out failed communication lines or move T1 lines to
standby equipment. Whether it's managed locally or remotely from a central
site, an SX100 dramatically reduce overhead costs and manual intervention, and
it lowers the cost of spare equipment required to manage each Point of
Presence.
It automates the changeover process, enabling unattended operation POPs or
central facilitles.
Connect up to 24 communications lines to either 24 or 48 communications
servers, routers, and CSU/DSUs.
-Buy/Sell/Trade-Sun/SGI/Next/Mac/Cisco/Bay-
-For more GREAT DEALS follow the link below-
http://members.aol.com/GbyTheSea/index.html
------------------------------
From: "Earl W. Harlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba and Win '98
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 16:04:28 -0500
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I have setup a Samba server and I have all of my Windows '95 machines logging
into it just fine. I can see both the server and the workgroup in
Network Neighborhood. If I want to log into the Samba server, I double
click on the server and the resulting dialog box recognizes the user properly
(from the Microsoft Client logon) and asks for the users password.
Once supplied, it logs on correctly.
<p>My problem is on the few Win '98 machines we have. The process
is the same. I can see both the workgroup and the Samba server in
Network Neighborhood. When I try to open the Samba server, it provides
the same dialog box asking for the password, but in Win '98, it sees the
machine as IPC$ instead of the user's logon name. Needless to say,
I cannot supply the users name anywhere and the password for the user does
not work, of course.
<p>Can anybody tell me what I need to change in Win '98 (registry or what)
so that it will supply the proper logon information to the Samba server?
<p>thanks
<p>Earl Harlow
<br>Weather Modification, Inc.</html>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Valid IP addresses for home network
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 00:19:44 GMT
In article <7gl88u$q8k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff Lasman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The machine that connects to the Internet MUST have an Internet-routable
> > IP address;
Ok, perhaps I'm just a little denser than usual on this subject. The machine
that connects directly to the Internet will get a dynamic IP address; the
others will 'appear' as if they are this machine using ip masquerading (I
think), even though I using a dummy local IP address for the local machines
in the 192.168.0.xxx range. Am I correct so far? If so, then does the
machine connected to the Internet need one of these addresses for local use
when _not_ connected (say, 192.168.0.2) to properly interact w/ the other
machines (laptops and old 486's, 192.168.0.3,4,5...etc). And, I guess it all
boils down to this: how does the local IP address, for instance, 192.168.0.2,
translate to the IP address given by the ISP when that machine (P2-400) _is_
connected to the net?
Sorry if this seems redundant to some out there. I don't have a static IP
address, and looking at the web page recommended previously, I won't either,
since it is not considerd acceptable to issue static IP's for ease of
administration (darn!!)
Thanks for the help so far, keep it coming!
Monte Milanuk
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Where to Download ppp-2.3.7?
Date: 3 May 1999 13:28:39 -0500
Peggy Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: hi , can anyone give the web/ftp site?
ftp://cs.anu.edu.au/pub/software/ppp/
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Better is the enemy of good enough. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (DB7654321)
Subject: Re: Installing via direct cable connection
Date: 3 May 1999 19:01:15 GMT
Thanks for all the suggestions. I just need to copy the installation files to
the dos machine. From there I will do a Red Hat Linux 5.2 hard drive
installation.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lance Miller)
Subject: gigabit ethernet
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 19:00:14 GMT
Hello!
Doe's anyone know if there is support for gigabit ethernet on linux
x86 platform?
Thanks,
Lance Miller
------------------------------
From: Amir Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network
Date: 4 May 1999 01:32:31 GMT
I have a 3-port + 1 uplink port Asante NetExtender hub. Which port should
I connect the 10BaseT cable to? If I connect it to any of the three normal
hub ports, they light up, but if I connect it to the uplink port, the
light doesn't light up. When I try to do: route add -net 192.168.0.0
...it says:
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
...but when I do: route add -net 192.168.0.2 (the ip for the NT box)
... it says:
SIOCADDRT: Invalid argument
How can I set up the approptiate routing?
NOTE: This is my Kernel IP routing table:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
pc404hp * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 1 1 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 1 lo
default pc404hp 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 1 0 eth0
Thanks,
Amir
mist wrote:
>
>
> Have you set up the routing information? Does stuff other than ping
work?
> Are the network cards configured properly and working? Does the hub
work?
> What's the output from route and ifconfig on the Linux box?
>
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255
up
> route add -net 192.168.0.0
>
> if you've not already done that, or it's not set up for you...
> --
> Mist.
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
