Linux-Networking Digest #31, Volume #12 Wed, 28 Jul 99 01:13:40 EDT
Contents:
Re: Can't ping ISP (Mark Bestel)
Re: Can't ping by name, But NSLOOKUP works perfectly. ("JOEY_BRENN")
Re: How to use lpr -s switch? -r doesn't work.... (John McKown)
Re: POP Mail? (machine)
Re: DHCPd (Peter Buelow)
Re: Connecting Windows CE: ppp, serial cable (Peter Buelow)
Re: IP mapping (Daniel Charlebois)
Samba Client Woes (root)
missing PPP compress modules (Tim Downing)
D-Link 530 TX (Lindoze 2000)
Re: Netscape scraps Limux! (Bob Farmer)
Re: Masquerading/IPChains problem for ICQ and Iphone (jam)
Re: Can't ping by name, But NSLOOKUP works perfectly. ("JOEY_BRENN")
Re: Remote X Server and telnet problem with Redhat (Mark Bestel)
Re: exportfs problem (=?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1=E8=B4=F6=C8=AF?=)
Re: PAM authenticating to Novell NDS or NT Domain? (Pascal Fleer)
Zebra & PoPToP (Malay Shah)
Re: Odd problem with wu-ftpd on RH6 (Bill Steiner)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't ping ISP
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:03:42 +1000
This is probably the case because your firewall machine (linux?) does
not have IP forwarding enabled. This should be the case if you do not
have a registered IP address for your Win95 box. If you don't, you may
want to think about using a proxy such as squid to allow your Win95 box
to access the web. Otherwise, forwarding can be enabled by edting
/etc/sysconfig/network and setting the forwarding option to true. This
will be enabled when the system comes up next.
Mark Bestel
mikes wrote:
> While dialed into my ISP....
>
> From my firewall I can ping my Win95 machine and my ISP.
> From My Win 95 machine I can ping my firewall, but can't ping my ISP
>
> What should I check for?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> -Mike
------------------------------
From: "JOEY_BRENN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't ping by name, But NSLOOKUP works perfectly.
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 03:33:03 GMT
The /etc/resolv.conf is as follows:
domain stercolks.edu
nameserver 198.248.168.128
nameserver 164.113.192.242
The first entry is our machine, the second is our ISP.
What is the /etc/named.conf file? Is there something that I need to do to
make this work? Like reboot (tried), rebuild the kernal, etc. I believe
this should work without anything except reboot or killing and restarting
named. I can ping ip addresses, nslookup looks up all addresses forward and
reverse but ping, telnet, tracert, etc. all return host not found unless I
put the address in the /etc/hosts file. Then ping, telnet,... all work
properly.
Any other files. This has to be something really simple that I am just
overlooking.
Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7nlicj$oka$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Wait, your machine is the DNS server for you? (aside- do you really need
> your own DNS server?)
>
> Nslookup will be querying your DNS tables.
>
> Either order will work in your hosts.conf file, but you probably want
> "hosts, bind" to speed up locally resolvable names such as non-FQDN hosts.
>
> What does your /etc/resolv.conf file look like? Sounds like you don't
have
> a "nameserver" entry in there. That's what I would check.
>
> when you try to ping stuff, are you using the fully-qualified domain name
or
> just a hostname? Can you ping by IP address?
>
> HTH
>
> Doug Apel
> Sr. Network Administrator
> Omnipoint Technologies, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JOEY_BRENN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:cwrn3.48$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > We have changed every file I can find, in every configuration I know
> about.
> > We are using bind-8.1.2. How do I get the machine to use DNS when it
> can't
> > find it in /etc/host.
> >
> > Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > JOEY_BRENN wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I have set up a tcp-ip connection to the internet, my nslookup works
> > like a
> > > > champ, but I can't use ping, traceroute, etc. because it is looking
at
> > the
> > > > /etc/hosts file. I verified this by hard coding a known IP address
> and
> > sure
> > > > enough, it pings. The /etc/host.conf file lists 'order bind,
hosts'.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas are greatly appreciated!
> > > > Joey Brenn
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > have you added a nameserver line to /etc/resolv.conf? I am assuming
you
> > > have a nameserver. If not, you will have to hard code all the
> > > names<->IP's into /etc/hosts and that would be a pain. Good luck.
> > > --
> > > Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
> > > --
> > > "Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C
manual
> > > referred to a "pointer to void."
> >
> >
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKown)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to use lpr -s switch? -r doesn't work....
Date: 28 Jul 1999 04:00:17 GMT
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 05:46:13 GMT, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[big snip]
>
>So it seems it wouldn't be difficult to parse the subject line for the file
>name, but I'm not sure how to automatically start such a script upon
>reception of mail.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Eric
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry about the delay in replying. I've been trying to think of a way to
start a script upon receipt of an email message. So far, I'm coming up
empty. My best guess at this point would be to have a script start up
in /etc/rc.d/rc.local (or whatever) which looks for new mail and then
sleeps for a minute or two before trying again. I can't think of one
that would be "event driven".
good luck!
John
------------------------------
From: machine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: POP Mail?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 05:10:05 +0200
Lindoze 2000 wrote:
> cool!
> although I dont see text that I type, I can see the response.
> do you know what commands nutscrape sends to the pop3 server?
>
You have probably disabled local echo, just switch it on. The commands can
be found in the RFC for POP3 (just pick any search engine and enter +rfc
+pop3)..
J. Emans aka machine@IRCnet
PGP Public Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~machine/DSSkey.html
--
If you live to the age of a hundred you have it made because very few
people die past the age of a hundred.
-- George Burns
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCPd
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:41:56 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"John G. Drummond" wrote:
>
> Greets, Linuxers. I'm having a problem that I can't solve,
> no matter how many versions of TFM I read. . .
>
> When I start DHCPd on my new, handy-dandy box (running the
> latest version of slackware, kernel 2.2.6), I get the message:
>
> socket: Protocol not available - make sure CONFIG_PACKET and CONFIG_FILTER
> are defined in your kernel configuration!
>
> Well, they are, AND all the requisite ports are uncommented in
> /etc/services.
>
> This box only has one ethernet interface. Anyone with a suggestion
> will be rewarded with my gratitude and thanks, whatever that's worth.
> --
> -=-=-=-
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://falcon.jmu.edu/~drummojg/
> "On the keyboard of Life, always keep one finger on the ESC key."
> --H.C. Phillips
Get a new copy from www.isc.org and rebuild it. It kinda looks like
you have either a broken version or one that is looking in the wrong
places for stuff.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: Peter Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connecting Windows CE: ppp, serial cable
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:38:43 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Patterson wrote:
>
> I have a Jornada 680 with Windows CE on it. I also have a machine with
> Debian 2.1 installed on it. The two are connected through a serial cable
> on /dev/ttyS1.
>
> I execute:
> pppd -detach crtscts lock 192.168.0.7:192.168.0.69 /dev/ttyS1 19200 debug
>
> And I see on the palmtop: "Connecting to Host." It goes through four retries,
> then fails.
>
> The log on the linux box reads:
>
> Jan 3 09:31:25 gold pppd[403]: pppd 2.3.5 started by mike, uid 0
> Jan 3 09:31:26 gold pppd[403]: Using interface ppp0
> Jan 3 09:31:26 gold pppd[403]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> Jan 3 09:31:26 gold pppd[403]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0> <auth pap>
><magic 0x4ab91141> <pcomp> <accomp>]
> Jan 3 09:31:47 gold last message repeated 7 times
> Jan 3 09:31:48 gold pppd[403]: Modem hangup
> Jan 3 09:31:48 gold pppd[403]: Connection terminated.
> Jan 3 09:31:49 gold pppd[403]: Exit.
>
> Any ideas, anyone?
>
> --=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--
> Michael K Patterson, HP Software Engineer
> My opinions do not represent those of HP. If they do, it's coincidence.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a non-trivial problem as I don't think anyone really knows
what microsoft uses for authentication between CE-Services and CE. If
anyone does, please let me know as I am about two weeks away from
starting in on this problem and looking to build an App that will allow
bacup/restore and simple file managment. You can't simply up a PPP
connection and hope it works as CE doesn't use PPP in the connection at
all. I am sure they did this to keep people from building Multi-Platform
apps to manage their H-Pc's and P-PC's. MS won't make any money if you
don't HAVE to buy their products. I mean really, Bill is only just into
the 100B$ mark. Way too little, with cost of college for his kids,
property taxes and such! If anyone has any insight into what is being
passed back and forth, I would love to hear it. A good dump of a packet
Sniffer running on Win9x/NT while the two are communicating would be
great. I suspect a mix of TCP/IP and SMB myself.
--
Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
--
"Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
referred to a "pointer to void."
------------------------------
From: Daniel Charlebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP mapping
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:37:28 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============73CE3BC1B3CF3CC201C99152
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
IP mapping simply is a little like NATing but it maps a static
set of "public" IP addresses to static set of private (10.x.y.z)
IP addresses. I realize that the code would normally live in
the linux kernel, but I need to add this functionality to an OS
that does not support NATing.
Daniel
Peter Buelow wrote:
>
> Daniel Charlebois wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know where I can get the source code for IP mapping?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Daniel
> How do you mean, IP mapping? Sort of a vague question. Anyway, most of
> the linux IP code lives in the kernel and that is where you should look.
> --
> Peter Buelow - Software Engineer
> Motorola - Common Platform Group
> --
> "Finger to spiritual emptiness underlying everything." -- How a C manual
> referred to a "pointer to void."
==============73CE3BC1B3CF3CC201C99152
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="charlebs.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Daniel Charlebois
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="charlebs.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Charlebois;Daniel
tel;fax:+847-632-3727
tel;home:+847-776-1948
tel;work:+847-632-6709
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Motorola - CDMA Systems Division;QC513
adr:;;1475 W. Shure Dr.;Arlington Heights;IL;60004;US
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-cpt:;17904
fn:Daniel Charlebois
end:vcard
==============73CE3BC1B3CF3CC201C99152==
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:24:04 -0400
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Samba Client Woes
OK. I've read every piece of documentation out there, but I still
can't get my linux box to see any hosts on my system that aren't in
/etc/lmhosts AND I can't make it log in to my NT server which you must
do on my network before you can use any share. Here is some basic info
on my system:
-MS NT4 server with 99% windows workstations.. and then there's me with
Redhat Linux 6.0
-DHCP
-No wins server
-behind a firewall/proxy (shouldn't affect anything, right?)
-computers represented by 10.1.1.x
-default gateway 10.1.1.1
-able to ping any system in local network.
-unable to ping systems outside the network due to firewall
-i have DNS addresses in there, but mainly just for my internet??
-system administrator is an ass who won't help me.
-the internt works so i know my network card works.
This is how you set up a workstation in windows:
-TCP/IP network using DHCP, so in windows, I don't set a wins server, a
dns.. nothing. dhcp does it.
-Client for microsoft networks logs into an NT domain at boot named
TELECON
-File and printer sharing exists
-Intel ether express 10/100
then you just log in when windows reboots.
This is what I've done so far in Linux:
-installed samba with basic redhat setup
-these lines exists in /etc/services:
netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service
netbios-ns 137/udp
netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service
netbios-dgm 138/udp
netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBIOS session service
netbios-ssn 139/udp
-i'm loading smbd and nmbd through inetd.conf. here are the lines:
#SAMBA services
netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/smbd smbd
netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/sbin/nmbd nmbd
-this is my smb.conf
[global]
security = server
config file = /etc/smb.conf
announce as = Win95
share modes = yes
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
mangle case = yes
case sensitive = no
default case = lower
preserve case = yes
short preserve case = no
password level = 0
preferred master = no
os level = 0
null passwords = yes
dead time = 0
debug level = 0
domain master = no
load printers = no
password server = TELECON
comment = Ben
workgroup = TELECON
[Root]
available = yes
public = yes
guest only = no
writable = no
browseable = yes
only user = no
comment = The root dir of my HD.
path = /
write list = root
-here are some common error messages:
smbmount '\\halo\' -U polidore -W TELECON
Password:
SMBtconX failed. ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare
Perhaps you are using the wrong sharename, username or password?
Some servers insist that these be in uppercase
BUT halo is in my lmhosts file. This is what happens when I use one
that's not:
smbmount '\\robert\' -U polidore -W TELECON
cli_open_sockets: Unknown host ROBERT.
This is what happens when I try to log in to my NT server with
smbpasswd:
smbpasswd -j TELECON
modify_trust_password: Can't resolve address for TELECON
1999/07/27 11:20:08 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change
password for domain TELECON.
Can someone please help me. I've been working on this for 2 days, and
I'm at my wit's end. Also, please send me a cc: of your replies.
Thanks in advance,
Ben Polidore
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Downing)
Subject: missing PPP compress modules
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 03:33:02 GMT
I've just installed RH 6.0 and setup a ppp server.
When a ppp session starts the syslog reports:
Jul 28 11:04:58 dialup-gw pppd[498]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Jul 28 11:05:02 dialup-gw modprobe: can't locate module
ppp-compress-21
Jul 28 11:05:03 dialup-gw modprobe: can't locate module
ppp-compress-26
Jul 28 11:05:05 dialup-gw modprobe: can't locate module
ppp-compress-24
I've downloaded the source for ppp and recompiled but still have the
same problem. There are references to the compression modules in the
README.linux file and I've located them and put them in
/lib/modules/2.2.5-15/net/ (they're called slhc.o ppp.o and
bsd_comp.o) but still no joy.
Where is modprobe looking for the modules anyway?
While these messages don't stop ppp sessions altogether, I would like
to get compression working if possible.
Any help/ideas much appreciated.
Regards,
Tim.
=================
Tim Downing
Systems Manager
Touchstone Colour
Perth, Australia
------------------------------
From: Lindoze 2000 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: D-Link 530 TX
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 23:52:56 -0400
has anyone gotten this network problem?
D-Link 530 TX card
Linux tells me:
"something wicked has happened: 1080"
or
"something wicked has happened: 1083"
or
"something wicked has happened: 1081"
what is that?
--
########################################################
## ##
## http://www.FusionPlant.com ##
## ##
########################################################
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Farmer)
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.protocols.smb,comp.os.linux,linux.redhat.ppp,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Netscape scraps Limux!
Date: 27 Jul 1999 21:39:05 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Monte Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well Andrew, as a matter fact it does. AAnd if you'd give it some
>thought you would see: That one netscape is the primary browser in the
>*nix world. Being such it is also the primary source by which many
>access SAMBA files.
Access Samba files through Netscape? Huh?
And what does the Netscape browser have to do with their server products?
Their new in-development browser is open source anyway, so there's no
danger of it not being available for Linux...
>If Netscape screws linux then samba will suffer because many potential
>users of *nix will say to hell with it and stay with windows. Andrew
>I know you are a longtime unix man, to bad really since it gives you a
>myopic view on the world.
I don't think many people using Linux care about availability of
Netscape's server products, free/open source things are available that
pretty much provide the same functionality.
--
Bob Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Services, Sam Houston State University; Huntsville, TX
------------------------------
From: jam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masquerading/IPChains problem for ICQ and Iphone
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 00:22:21 +1000
hihi.
Um...me have similar problem too I think...I dunno what's wrong with it,
however, there is this module called ip_masq_icq.o (can be found in
freshmeat) which solves this problem I think.
I've installed it, but have not really tested it yet. :P
Sorry, not sure about IPhone.
jam
> Hi there,
>
> Can anybody help me with this?
>
> I have these strange problems with ICQ (and Iphone, but that's commonly
> known).
>
> Some people cannot file-transer to me in ICQ, some people can.
> Some people cannot msg me in ICQ, some people can.
> Some people cannot chat request me, some people can.
> This is very annoying.
>
> The problem for IPhone is that i can't be called.
>
> I run Redhat 6.0 on a Pentium 200, 128 Mb
>
> CC-Reply-to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Thanx in advance,
>
> Lars Dam
> P.O.Box 631
> 3430 AP Nieuwegein
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://wwwserv.caiw.nl/~oxygen
------------------------------
From: "JOEY_BRENN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't ping by name, But NSLOOKUP works perfectly.
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 03:41:10 GMT
Sorry! This file contains several lines but this is the only line that
contains dns.
hosts: files [NOTFOUND=return] nisplus nis dns
Any ideas?
JOEY_BRENN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:MUun3.82$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I found this file and it contains:
> passwd: files [NOTFOUND=return] nisplus nis
>
> but this is it. What must this file look like? This could be my problem
> because I don't see what I need to do to configure it.
>
> Mark Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > There is also a file called /etc/nsswitch.conf this should determine the
> order
> > that naming services are queried in.
> >
> > JOEY_BRENN wrote:
> >
> > > I have set up a tcp-ip connection to the internet, my nslookup works
> like a
> > > champ, but I can't use ping, traceroute, etc. because it is looking at
> the
> > > /etc/hosts file. I verified this by hard coding a known IP address
and
> sure
> > > enough, it pings. The /etc/host.conf file lists 'order bind, hosts'.
> > >
> > > Any ideas are greatly appreciated!
> > > Joey Brenn
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
------------------------------
From: Mark Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Remote X Server and telnet problem with Redhat
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 12:45:12 +1000
Sounds like your linux machines DNS is not working correctly. Have you
configured it? does it work?
Juan Busto wrote:
> When telneting from a Windows98 to my Linux box there is a very long
> delay before linux responds. This problem occurs with both Redhat 5.2
> and 6.0. I also have a problem with Exceed 6.0 X-server software
> trying to communicate with the same machine. In this case I don't get
> any response at all. Anyone have any ideas?
> Thanks!
>
> Juan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B1=E8=B4=F6=C8=AF?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: exportfs problem
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 13:00:23 +0900
My /etc/hosts.allow and /etc/hosts.deny is empty.
This is my solaris machine's rpcinfo.
program vers proto port service
100000 4 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 3 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 4 udp 111 rpcbind
100000 3 udp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind
100024 1 udp 32772 status
100024 1 tcp 32771 status
100232 10 udp 32773 sadmind
100011 1 udp 32774 rquotad
100012 1 udp 32775 sprayd
100021 1 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 2 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 4045 nlockmgr
100008 1 udp 32776 walld
100001 2 udp 32777 rstatd
100001 3 udp 32777 rstatd
100001 4 udp 32777 rstatd
100083 1 tcp 32772
100221 1 tcp 32773
100068 2 udp 32778
100068 3 udp 32778
100068 4 udp 32778
100068 5 udp 32778
100021 1 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 2 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 4045 nlockmgr
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
100227 2 udp 2049 nfs_acl
100227 3 udp 2049 nfs_acl
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
100227 2 tcp 2049 nfs_acl
100227 3 tcp 2049 nfs_acl
100005 1 udp 32790 mountd
100005 2 udp 32790 mountd
100005 3 udp 32790 mountd
100005 1 tcp 32785 mountd
100005 2 tcp 32785 mountd
100005 3 tcp 32785 mountd
805503995 2 tcp 36686
805503995 1 tcp 36687
805306368 1 udp 33528
805307520 1 udp 33529
This rpcinfo has tcp port for nfs, but linux machine doesn't have =
this line.
Please help ..
Britt wrote:
> =
> =B1=E8=B4=F6=C8=AF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> =
> : I don't know why "tcp nfs" is not appear.
> =
> nfs is done over ufs so you won't see a 'tcp nfs' line
> =
> : Question is
> : 1.How can I export my linux system.
> =
> every thing you're doing seems good to me, you might want to check the =
files
> /etc/hosts.allow
> /etc/hosts.deny
> and check to see if you are denying connections to portmapper
> =
> : 2.Is it ok,this rpcinfo -p report?
> =
> yup
> =
> : 3.When I ran mount command in my ultra sparc system,
> : why I got that message. (NFS service not responding)
> =
> Looks like you're not getting through portmapper to the nfs daemons.
> =
> B
> =
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------=
> Britt Bolen [EMAIL PROTECTED] britt.bolen.com=
-- =
|
,o __|-.
Name) Duck-Hwan Kim _~o/ \/ |
Tel) 82-42-863-2166~7 ' |/ |
Fax) 82-42-863-2168 / > |
Email) [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' ` |
|
_________________________________________________________________|_____
------------------------------
From: Pascal Fleer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAM authenticating to Novell NDS or NT Domain?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 06:42:55 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Doug,
Doug wrote:
> Does the NCP crap require an IPX stack to be available/loaded/configured?
> What about in a Netware v5 pure-IP environment?
>
The NCP package is based on bindery mode connections, so all the advantages of
the NDS are lost. Beside of this,
it has problems to talk with very recent implementations of the netware servers
over IPX - Netware 4.11 with latest
service pack, and netware 5.0. ncpmount fails. with netware 3.x, 4.x no problem.
>
> Failing NDS, how about authenticating to an NT domain controller? I have
> pam_ntdom working on 4 RH5 boxes, but I can't get pam_ntdom to compile under
> either Solaris 2.x or HPUX 10.20/11.0 because of unresolved symbols, which
> I'm guessing indicates at least one library is missing. Happens under gcc,
> Sparcworks compiler, and HP's real ansi compiler.
>
How about LDAP from Novell ?
Has anybody seen NCP over IP, and NDS support for Linux ? I know that Novell
wants to make
NDS for Linux available, but does include a so called requestor ?
We have about 500 servers and about 80000 NDS objects, and the number of Linux
workstation is
growing. Would be nice to use the advantages of the NDS.
Pascal
------------------------------
From: Malay Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Zebra & PoPToP
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 03:50:40 GMT
Hi, I was wondering how I would go about setting up PoPToP to assign a
real ip to the remote host on the pptp connection. I also need to use
some sort of routing daemon, so how would I setup zebra? any help would
be appreciated.
Malay Shah
------------------------------
From: Bill Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Odd problem with wu-ftpd on RH6
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 21:48:08 -0700
Thanks for your help, Brian. That did it! Yep, I had looked through man
ftpshut, but not carefully enought.
Bill Steiner
Brian Daniels wrote:
> When you executed ftpshut, it created a file called /etc/shutmsg. You
> will need to delete that file to allow the ftp server to restart.
>
> See man ftpshut for more details.
>
> --Brian
>
> On Mon, 26 Jul 1999 19:30:30 -0700, Bill Steiner
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Brian:
> >
> >Wish I could help you, but you're way ahead of me with wu-ftpd. I'm a
> >newbee.
> >
> >Perhaps you can give me a clue to a problem I'm having. I, too am using
> >RHL 6.0 with wu-ftpd-2.5-2. Ftp has run fine for a month or two. A few
> >days ago, I used ftpshut to temporarily stop the service, and have been
> >unable to get the ftp server to start up again. Everytime I try to access
> >the server, I get a message that the server is shut down, try again later.
> >I've tried rebooting with no success. How do you restart wu-ftpd after
> >you've executed ftpshut?
> >
> >The ftp line in inetd.conf has fewer settings than yours:
> >
> > ftp stream tcp nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd in.ftpd -l -a
> >
> >
> >Thanks for your help.
> >
> >Bill Steiner
> >
> >Brian Daniels wrote:
> >
> >> We're using wu-ftpd-2.5.0-2 on RedHat 6.0. The server is working
> >> fine, but we have noticed the following problem:
> >>
> >> After several days of operation, there will be many 'leftover'
> >> in.ftpds. We allow 100 users at a time and this is resulting in users
> >> being denied access to the site even though there are only 3-4 active
> >> connections.
> >>
> >> If you do a ftpshut followed by a killall in.ftpd, then all is fine
> >> for several more days.
> >>
> >> Once the problem develops, a ps shows:
> >>
> >> # ps ax | grep in.ftpd
> >> 27280 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 29153 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 29530 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 30009 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 31063 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 31067 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 31384 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 31899 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 31948 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 32115 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 324 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 572 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 581 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 1094 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 1449 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 1709 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 2302 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> 2519 ? SW 0:00 [in.ftpd]
> >> <many more follow>
> >>
> >> wu-ftpd is being launched from inetd.conf as follows:
> >> ftp stream tcp nowait.255 root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.ftpd
> >> -l -a -t240 -T240
> >>
> >> Any ideas on solving this would be appreciated.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Brian
> >> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
