Linux-Networking Digest #48, Volume #11 Wed, 5 May 99 11:13:31 EDT
Contents:
HELP: SUSE 6.1 + IPX: Crash at "ipx_interface add" ("Martin Oberueber")
Re: IP Aliasing problems (gianluca)
Help ISDN HISAX 16.3c install (Csejtey Gabor Zoltan)
DHCP confused (hugo tetreault)
IP Aliasing problems (Nick Williams)
W98 can ping Linux; Linux can't ping W98?? (Mark Larimer)
RH5.2, kernel 2.0.36 : network printing problems ("Sunil P. Khatri")
Re: Valid IP addresses for home network ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
newbie question - fron red hat to suse ("abba fan")
Re: RedHat 5.2 and Linksys Combo Cards ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SAMBA and Shared in W95/98 (Sergey Koltogyan)
Re: Help with "route" command ("Curt")
Re: restarting networking services ("Holger Repp")
Re: Linux ppp server and win98 dialup client (Clifford Kite)
Re: VERY slow modem (Clifford Kite)
Re: NT faster than Linux? (Andy Thomas)
network services (Chris Snyder)
Re: Internet Callback (Bill Long)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Martin Oberueber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HELP: SUSE 6.1 + IPX: Crash at "ipx_interface add"
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:48:25 +0200
After updating from SUSE 6.0 to SUSE 6.1 (Kernel 2.2.5) I can't get IPX to
start.
I Want to access a Novell Fileserver via ncpmount. under SUSE 6.0 it works
without any Problems.
Under SUSE 6.1 I get a crash.
What I do:
First load Mod ipx works:
insmod ipx
** log **
kernel: NET4: Linux IPX 0.38 for NET4.0
kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
** end log **
Then Configure Network card with:
ipx_interface add eth0 etherii
I get a heavy crash. In the logfile I get:
** log **
kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
000000
kernel: current->tss.cr3 = 00101000, %cr3 = 00101000
kernel: *pde = 00000000
kernel: Oops: 0000
kernel: CPU: 0
kernel: EIP: 0010:[<00000000>]
kernel: EFLAGS: 00010246
kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: c2aafcc0 ecx: c2306dd0 edx: c2aafcc0
kernel: esi: c2306e6c edi: c07e1d30 ebp: 00000001 esp: c072bf34
kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
kernel: Process ifconfig (pid: 482, process nr: 64, stackpage=c072b000)
kernel: Stack: c2306e6c c2306dd0 c016639b c2306e6c 00000000 c2306dd0
c0166788 c2306e6c
kernel: c2ae1b60 c0123e67 c2306dd0 c2ae1b60 c2ae1b60 00000000
c07e1d30 c0124f9f
kernel: c2ae1b60 c2ae1b60 c2ae1b60 c0123ee5 c2ae1b60 00000005
00000001 c4189d60
kernel: Call Trace: [sock_release+31/80] [sock_close+56/60] [__fput+31/72]
[fput+23/72] [filp_close+85/96] [do_exit+316/580] [sys_exit+14/16]
kernel: [system_call+52/56]
kernel: Code: <1>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual
address 00000000
kernel: current->tss.cr3 = 00101000, %cr3 = 00101000
kernel: *pde = 00000000
kernel: Oops: 0000
kernel: CPU: 0
kernel: EIP: 0010:[show_registers+527/576]
kernel: EFLAGS: 00010082
kernel: eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: c025dc04 edx: c5da8000
kernel: esi: 0000002b edi: c072c000 ebp: c8800000 esp: c072be9c
kernel: ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
kernel: Process ifconfig (pid: 482, process nr: 64, stackpage=c072b000)
kernel: Stack: c072a000 c0237084 c025dcd6 c8800000 c9000000 c0108ef9
c072bef8 c020733c
kernel: c02082e1 00000000 00000000 c010e022 c02082e1 c072bef8
00000000 c072a000
kernel: c2306e6c c07e1d30 00000001 c2b6292c c0108b7d c072bef8
00000000 c2aafcc0
kernel: Call Trace: [serial:register_serial+-250552/284] [<c9000000>]
[die+45/56] [stext_lock+5364/9488] [stext_lock+9369/9488]
[do_page_fault+702/784] [stext_lock+9369/9488]
kernel: [error_code+45/52] [<c8851fbc>] [sock_release+31/80]
[sock_close+56/60] [__fput+31/72] [fput+23/72] [filp_close+85/96]
[do_exit+316/580]
kernel: [sys_exit+14/16] [system_call+52/56]
kernel: Code: 0f b6 04 03 89 44 24 14 50 68 34 73 20 c0 e8 2e 9c 00 00 83
** end log **
Can anybody help??
Thanks
Martin
------------------------------
From: gianluca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: ox.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Aliasing problems
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 14:09:59 +0200
Nick Williams wrote:
> OK, so what is going wrong here?:
>
> RH5.2 / 2.2.5 kernel
> IP aliasing support compiled into the kernel
> net-tools-1.52
>
> I do:
>
> ifconfig eth0:0 100.0.0.1
>
> which works fine:
>
> eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:08:74:E8:77
> inet addr:100.0.0.1 Bcast:100.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> Interrupt:9 Base address:0xef00
>
ok you set up interface... but you did not add anything to the routing
table...
next thing you have to do is something like this
/sbin/route add -host 195.191.34.54 dev eth0:8
this will add this to the routing table
195.191.34.54 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth0:8
bye gianluca
>
> I think, however, there is something fubar with the routing;
> netstat -nr (snipped appropriately) returns:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 100.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
> which (I think) is wrong; I think the interface should be
> eth0:0 rather than plain eth0.
>
> I can ping other devices on the 100.0.0.0 subnet, but I can't
> seem to get any TCP traffic to them. Telnet times out
> etc. traceroute gives the following:
>
> traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 163.1.145.129 @ eth0
> traceroute to 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>
> and then just sits there, clearly not working. If I force
> traceroute to use eth0:0 with the -i option, it works:
>
> traceroute to 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1) 7.677 ms 11.814 ms 9.624 ms
>
> Assuming that this is some brokenness with the automatic route
> configuration that ifconfig/something does, I removed the route
> to the 100.0.0.0 network, and set a correct route:
>
> route del -net 100.0.0.0 dev eth0
> route add -net 100.0.0.0 dev eth0:0
>
> Only that changes precisely nothing, and the route still appears
> like its been setup to go via eth0, rather than eth0:0.
>
> Any ideas what is going on here?
>
> It looks like a routing problem, in that the routing table isn't
> accepting an aliased interface, and defaulting to the straight
> eth0 device. Since eth0 then seems to have two addresses, it's
> defaulting to the first.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick.
>
> --
>
> [ Nick Williams Office - 01865-(2)79252 ]
> [ Computing Officer Mobile - 07775-637124 ]
> [ New College, Oxford http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~nick/ ]
------------------------------
From: Csejtey Gabor Zoltan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Help ISDN HISAX 16.3c install
Date: 5 May 1999 11:25:51 GMT
I use Debian 2.1. I would like to install
an ISDN HIsax 16.3c card with ISA slot into a 486 machine.
I used the following command:
depmod type=14 protocol=2 irq=10 io=0x580 id=teles
I got this message:
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 1
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 2
Teles 16.3c: IRQ(10) getting no interrupts during init 3
HiSax: Card Teles 16.3c not installed !
ISDN unloaded
Any help?
Gabor Csejtey
------------------------------
From: hugo tetreault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP confused
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 11:36:52 GMT
Hi,
Can someone tell me what is the difference between dhcpcd v.s.
dhclient ???
Hugo Tetreault
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Williams)
Crossposted-To: ox.os.linux
Subject: IP Aliasing problems
Date: 5 May 1999 12:34:55 +0100
OK, so what is going wrong here?:
RH5.2 / 2.2.5 kernel
IP aliasing support compiled into the kernel
net-tools-1.52
I do:
ifconfig eth0:0 100.0.0.1
which works fine:
eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:08:74:E8:77
inet addr:100.0.0.1 Bcast:100.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xef00
I think, however, there is something fubar with the routing;
netstat -nr (snipped appropriately) returns:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
100.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
which (I think) is wrong; I think the interface should be
eth0:0 rather than plain eth0.
I can ping other devices on the 100.0.0.0 subnet, but I can't
seem to get any TCP traffic to them. Telnet times out
etc. traceroute gives the following:
traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 163.1.145.129 @ eth0
traceroute to 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
and then just sits there, clearly not working. If I force
traceroute to use eth0:0 with the -i option, it works:
traceroute to 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1) 7.677 ms 11.814 ms 9.624 ms
Assuming that this is some brokenness with the automatic route
configuration that ifconfig/something does, I removed the route
to the 100.0.0.0 network, and set a correct route:
route del -net 100.0.0.0 dev eth0
route add -net 100.0.0.0 dev eth0:0
Only that changes precisely nothing, and the route still appears
like its been setup to go via eth0, rather than eth0:0.
Any ideas what is going on here?
It looks like a routing problem, in that the routing table isn't
accepting an aliased interface, and defaulting to the straight
eth0 device. Since eth0 then seems to have two addresses, it's
defaulting to the first.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
[ Nick Williams Office - 01865-(2)79252 ]
[ Computing Officer Mobile - 07775-637124 ]
[ New College, Oxford http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~nick/ ]
------------------------------
From: Mark Larimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: W98 can ping Linux; Linux can't ping W98??
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 01:29:12 -0500
Okay... the Win98 machine can ping the Linux box, telnet to it, ftp to it.
But the Linux box can't ping the Win98 machine!?
Win98: 192.168.1.1
Linux (RedHat 6): 192.168.1.2
[larimer@quazi /root]# ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:33:D9:AB:21
inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:633 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:526 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
When the Linux box tries to ping the W98 machine, both "Act" lights on the
two NICs blink...but it still gets 100% packet loss.
Any ideas?
Any help would be huge.
Thanks...
--mark
--
**********************************************************
*** FantasyBowl.com Play Fantasy Football ***
*** http://fantasybowl.com 1999 Grand Opening! ***
*** ***
*** Mark D. Larimer ***
*** [EMAIL PROTECTED] (651) 645-5623 ***
**********************************************************
------------------------------
From: "Sunil P. Khatri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH5.2, kernel 2.0.36 : network printing problems
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 06:29:58 GMT
I am running RH5.2 and a 2.0.36 kernel on a Thinkpad 770X. The machine
is networked using a 3Com 3c589D ethernet card.
After I boot the machine and try to print to my networked printer, I
get the message
lpr: connect: No such file or directory
jobs queued, but cannot start daemon.
Now, if I run "lpc restart all" as root, I get the message
lps20b:
no daemon to abort
lps20b:
lpc: connect: No such file or directory
couldn't start daemon
But if I re-run "lpc restart all" as root, I then get:
lps20b:
no daemon to abort
lps20b:
daemon started
Now the queued job prints, and subsequent print jobs proceed without
any error messages.
Any idea how I can avoid running "lpc restart all" twice manually?
Thanks in advance,
Sunil
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Valid IP addresses for home network
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 11:18:08 GMT
:> > ["172.16/9"?!], but that's no reason to discriminate against it. :)
: Actually, I think that should be /12, not /9. Grr. Call me old fashioned,
: but I still have trouble remembering netmask lengths outside the /8, /16, /24
: categories. Converting from decimal to binary, doing a calculation, and
: converting that back to decimal, isn't as easy as it was in college.
Hehe, I've run into the same "problem" before, so I just did up
it all up in a table on a webpage for easy reference. Prefix Length,
Netmask, and Binary Equivalents.
www.phaze.org/netmasks.html
------------------------------
From: "abba fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] yes - do take the junk out!>
Subject: newbie question - fron red hat to suse
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 14:26:45 +0100
Hi all,
This is awfully basic but I'm stuck so please help.
Under Red Hat, ifup ppp0 fired up ppp0 and connected me to the Net.
Under SuSE, ifup is not recognised so I can't get the box to dial.
What is the correct syntax to fire up ppp0 under SuSE please?
Patrick
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2 and Linksys Combo Cards
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 12:27:48 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (TheMerk) wrote:
>
> i have 2 linksys combo cards, one is a pci and the other is a pcmcia,
> i cant seem to find a way to get linux rh 5.2 that is to use the bnc
> connector and not the 10BaseT, my main goal it to do a network
> install on to my notebook that has a small hard drive, but I would
> like to get them both back up on my network, the network is a peer to
> peer based lan using 2 pc's, a couple of T-connectors and some coax.
> lan works great in 98 and Nt.
>
>
Those cards are ne2000 compatable. Try those drivers (ne200 & Compat.) I don't
know if they will autoprobe though. Might have to pass some arguments.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Sergey Koltogyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SAMBA and Shared in W95/98
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 17:05:53 +0300
Now in win 95/98 i`m share folder as Share levele.
I`m do not use NT srv.
Can i use SAMBA on LINUX for shared in 95/98 folders as USER LEVELE ??
I want get list useres from samba for restrict to folders on W95/98..
This will work or no ?
Serg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with "route" command
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 05:11:11 -0500
You seem to be missing a route to your loopback address.
Also you may want to becareful using IRQ3 for eth1. It is the default IRQ
for COM2, so there
could be a conflict, IRQ 5 or 10 would probably be a better choice.
Usually easiest to set with the DOS based program that came with the card.
Disable PnP if it is on.
<Wai Fai>; Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7goom3$ce8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello all,
>
> I had to rebuild my system over the weekend and I though I have all
> the necessary networking files under /etc backed up but I was mistaken. I
> have re-installed Linux 5.2 and I cannot get the 2 ethernet cards on this
> one system to ping itself - let alone pinging other computers (I was able
> to do IP masquerading before I did the rebuild). I watched the screen as
> the system boots and the two network cards were found and the correct MAC
> address reported by Linux. I think it has something to do with a file in
> /etc/rc.d/rc.inet1(?) which sets up the routing info and got blown away
> when I rebuilt the system. I have tried various "route" commands to no
> avail. I have included my "ifconfig -a" and "netstat -rn" output. Can
> someone show me the right "route" command to use (I did a search on
> www.dejanews.com and I did not find something that I could use). Thanks
for
> your help!.
>
>
> ========================================================================
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> BROADCAST LOOPBACK MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:46:A5:42
> inet addr:24.1.239.235 Bcast:24.1.239.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1762 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6100
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C8:EE:D4:62
> inet addr:192.168.125.3 Bcast:192.168.125.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x240
>
> ======================================================================
>
>
> ernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
> 192.168.125.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
> eth1
> 24.1.238.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 1500 0 0
> eth0
> 0.0.0.0 24.1.238.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
> eth0
>
>
> ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Holger Repp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Holger Repp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: restarting networking services
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:08:14 +0200
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
7gnqsc$1e7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If I change the configuration of Samba (or any other network service) how
do I
> restart the service with the new configuration with out rebooting the
machine?
are smbd and nmbd running as daemons or are they started from inetd?
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: Linux ppp server and win98 dialup client
Date: 5 May 1999 08:40:15 -0500
Ronald Hovens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I use RedHat 5.2 linux with the delivered kernel, mgetty and ppp.
: Dialing out to my ISP works fine, dialing in from a win98 laptop to my
: linux box via any communications program also works fine.
: What doesn't work: when I use win98 dialup everything SEEMS to work: the
: connection is established, ppp is succesfully started and stays up, but
: I cannot ping nor telnet nor browse my linux box over the phone line. I
: use no firewall, and all these actions work fine on my Lan.
: What is wrong? Many thanks in advance!
: Info: (all according to the ppp-howto)
: I use a class C network (192.168.0.x)
: I use fixed ip numbers (192.168.0.1 for the linux ppp server,
: 192.168.0.10 for the laptop)
: I use an alias for ppp: alias ppp="exec /usr/sbin/pppd -detach"
: My /etc/ppp/options/file looks like this:
: proxyarp
: lock
: crtcts
Maybe a typo but this should be crtscts .
: debug
: modem
The thing that stands out most is that you show no IP assignment.
It's actually possible for this to work without explicitly assigning
addresses on the Linux box but the Win box would have to supply it's own
address during the PPP negotiations. If you don't do this then try the
pppd option
192.168.0.1:192.168.0.10
If this isn't the problem then post outputs of route -n, ifconfig, and
the log for PPP negotiations.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: VERY slow modem
Date: 5 May 1999 09:10:09 -0500
Jason Bond ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: For some reason, transmission rates from my ISP
: are unbearably slow with I am running in Linux.
: When I am running in Win 95, they are much much
: faster (seriously, like 100 times faster). I actually have 2 modems,
: one is a 56k win modem (which windows obviously uses) and the other is a
: 33.6k modem which Linux uses. The discrepancy in speeds is NOT due to
: 56k vs 33.6k. I know it is quite hard to diagnose the problem from such
: a limited description, but does anyone have any ideas as to why this
: might be? Thanks greatly in advance.
Check the IRQ configured for the modem in Linux, "setserial /dev/ttySx"
with ttySx being the modem's device file. It must be the same as the
IRQ the modem actually requires. Although 100:1 may be too small a
ratio for an IRQ problem...
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: Andy Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: NT faster than Linux?
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 13:40:19 +0100
On 4 May 1999, Richard Corfield wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Anthony W. Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Rumour? says that M$-basic was basically DEC-basic or somesuch that he
> >came across while on work experience at college ...
>
> Way back then BBC Basic was the thing - especialy Version 5 with what were
> (for BASIC) advanced features such as switch and while and procedures
> with local variables and hence recursion. It was hardly OO but not bad.
I think MS Basic came out in about 1976 for CP/M 80 - I've still got the
manual. BBC Micros didn't appear until about 1984 although much of the
manual appears to have been written in late 1983.
Yes, I too liked BBCBasic though I've never used it on a 'real' BBC Micro!
I wrote a lot of software in the past for BBCBasic Z80 and BBCBasic 86+
for the CP/M and MS-DOS platforms respectively.
Andy
------------------------------
From: Chris Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: network services
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 10:17:23 -0400
I have changed the configuration for samba. How do I restart the service
without rebooting?
I tried /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba stop
/etc/rc.d/init.d/samba start
bash says that samba is not a valid command. Am I missing something here
or did I get some bad beta from these guys?
How does one rescan (restart) all the networking services?
Thanks in advance,
-Chris Snyder
------------------------------
From: Bill Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Internet Callback
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 08:04:36 GMT
mgetty can handle that. it can also handle cranking up pppd for you. its
a pretty handy little package. it also does faxing and PPP dialin if you
want it to. i cant remember the web page for it, but there is TONS of
support for it out there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have a problem, I'm using Linux SUSE 5.3, but I have difficulties getting
> online, in other words, I can't get online. I have a internet account that
> calls me back. So I call into a computer, I log-in, and I hang up. Then I get
> called back and my computer has to pick it up. But he doesn't.
> Can anyone tell me:
>
> What program I can use to make my computer pick up and make the connection?
>
> And how I must configure that program?
>
> Thanks everybody.
>
> Jasper Schoenmaker
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
www.bellanet.com - very nice web hosting services
- web application services
www.giftsgalore.com : www.longboys.net
telnet://undying.longboys.net:4000 http://undying.longboys.net
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
