Linux-Networking Digest #79, Volume #11 Sat, 8 May 99 06:14:19 EDT
Contents:
Need Apache DB Advice (Anthony Ewell)
Re: starting samba (nate)
RH 5.2 + 2.2.X, 2 NIC's, Firewall (Greg_Kettmann)
DHCP and linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Participate in LISA '99: Sys Admin Conference: Submission due: May 25 (Jennifer
Radtke)
Detecting multiple logins (Apache) (Dirk Freese)
Re: Linux and PLC Communications (Monte Milanuk)
Re: Multiple Mailboxes for Linux (Leslie Mikesell)
Newbie question: How "network" my linux pc to my win95 pc? (Andr� Bell [aka Andre
Bell])
Newbie: Ethernet card not detected ("Mohamed S. Abdallah")
Re: telnet delay??? ("Ross Oliver")
Re: 2 nic cards help!!! (clonq)
Re: [Newbie] Troubles with ISA ethernet card (nate)
Re: Redhat 6.0 (Samba shared printers) + Windows 2000 Professional (beta 3) == NO
GO! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Strange problem while connected to foreing host (Joerg Sauer)
Any one fancy a MAN ? - the GAGFAN proposal ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Running X through a masquerading router (Matthias Papesch)
Re: HELP - 3c589/Thinkpad 770X and ethernet random behavior...
("Sunil P. Khatri")
Re: Strange problem while connected to foreing host (Joerg Sauer)
Re: Linux newbie: Telnet and inetd setup (Jim Roberts)
Re: PPPD error message capture
Making Outlook Express work with Qmail ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Anthony Ewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Need Apache DB Advice
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 21:17:21 -0700
Hi,
I have to put together an internal company Apache server on a Red
Hat Linux box. The main application Apache need to run is a web
page that is tied into a database and must have both read and write
access to the database.
Does anyone have any opinions on what is the easiest, best way to
go at this? What is the easiest way to link Apache to the database,
etc.?
Many thanks,
--Tony
------------------------------
From: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: starting samba
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 20:46:49 -0400
at a shell prompt type 'setup' (no quotes)
you'll have options to start samba there, it'll be smb though, not samba
This works only on Red Hat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello I am running samba on redhat 6.0 and and I am wondering how do i make it
> start automatically at boot
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
Nate Campi | "My statements in this message are
| personal opinions which may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | have no basis whatsoever in fact."
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
------------------------------
From: Greg_Kettmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH 5.2 + 2.2.X, 2 NIC's, Firewall
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 20:54:52 -0400
I'm building a firewall, and have done so before. Previously I used RH
5.1. It seemed best to definately start with RH 5.2. Since I was
recompiling anyway (for two adapters and to enable firewalling) I
upgraded to the 2.2.6 kernel. I can't get the two adapters running.
They are Linksys Etherfast adapters. The instructions say to use the
Tulip driver. Which I did. It is loaded as a module (or compiled into
the kernel). The adapter works fine. I added a second. I put the
append in LILO (and ran LILO) (append="ether=11,0x4400,eth0
ether=10,0x4000,eth1") . I put the following in the /etc/conf.modules
file:
alias eth0 tulip
options eth0 io=0x4400 irq=11
alias eth1 tulip
options eth1 io=0x4000 irq=10
The values come from the bootup messages. The adapters appear to
configure and come active but both addresses are on the same card. That
is if I ping the x.x.x.56 address it is on eth0. If I ping x.x.x.156 it
is also on eth0. Nothing is on eth1. I can verify this by pinging from
another box and disconnecting the respective cables.
Any suggestions?
Also. I thought 5.2 used IPChains, not IPFWADM. IPChains is not a
recognized command but IPFWADM is.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DHCP and linux
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 04:23:12 GMT
Hi:
I think my DHCP client does not work.
Why I say that?
the ip addresss that i got from dhcp
never work. instead, i used the ip
address from windown and i get it working.
is there an update version or is it a new bug?
what should i do to get it fixed? did i do anything
stupid.
Thanks.alan
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jennifer Radtke)
Subject: Participate in LISA '99: Sys Admin Conference: Submission due: May 25
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 00:33:04 GMT
The Only Conference By and For System Administrators
LISA '99 --13TH USENIX SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCE
November 7-12, 1999
Seattle, Washington, USA
Co-sponsored by USENIX, The Advanced Computing Systems Association and
SAGE, The System Administrators Guild
Call for Participation: http://www.usenix.org/events/lisa99
===================================================
IMPORTANT DATES
Extended abstracts due: May 25, 1999
Invited Talk Proposals due: May 25, 1999
Notification to authors: June 30, 1999
Final papers/Invited Talks due: September 19, 1999
===================================================
The Program Committee invites you to join the contributors to the LISA '99
Conference. Submissions of refereed papers or other presentations which
address any and all aspects of System Administration are very welcome.
LISA is the largest and oldest conference for system administrators.
Participants are involved in all aspects of modern systems administration,
including user support, workstation and server administration, network
management, security and incident handling, and site-wide planning and
design. The LISA experience is special because the entire program is
assembled by veteran systems administrators who know first-hand the issues
you face, and what factors are important in devising solutions.
=========================================================================
The USENIX Association's international membership includes engineers,
scientists, and technicians working on the cutting edge of systems and
software. SAGE is devoted to the advancement and recognition of system
administration as a profession.
------------------------------
From: Dirk Freese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Detecting multiple logins (Apache)
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 02:09:18 +0200
Hi,
does someone know how to figure out if there are several logins on the
same username?
I use .htaccess/.htpasswd files on my machine to restrict access on
certain areas.
Assume I have a user "testusr". How can I figure out (and as a
consequence disable his login) if "testusr" is logged in several times.
I would like to block such a login in realtime (if possible).
If anyone has a hint for me how to get this to work, please let me know.
Thanks
Dirk Freese
------------------------------
From: Monte Milanuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and PLC Communications
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 21:18:43 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have just finished an app running on NT that controls a number of
> Allen Bradley PLC's. The app runs fine, but NT is up-and-down like a
> whore's knickers! No more than 5 days between reboots. I was wondering
> if anyone had ever tried to do PLC stuff using Linux as a platform and
> if so, what their experience was like.
>
> Thanks for any and all input
>
> Dave T
Nope, but I worked at a steel mill that used _large_ AB PLC5 racks w/
Pyramid integrators and Reliance AutoMate DCS systems, Most of our PC's
ran DOS 5, cause windows barfed too often when accessing the master
rack... very ugly!!, not to mention extremely dangerous in that
environment. I might suggest running the AB 6200 software on DOSEMU in
Linux. I would suggest RSLinx in WINE, but I don't think WINE is ready
for that kind of abuse yet.
Hope some of this helped
Monte Milanuk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: Multiple Mailboxes for Linux
Date: 8 May 1999 00:10:33 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martin Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can anyone point me to a program that will allow mulitple mailboxes on a
>mail client for linux, in the vein of Outlook Express. As a recent
>migrant to linux - full time on my desktop and laptop - using KDE and
>Star Division 5.0 Office Suite, I am committed to making this OS work in
>an ordinary working environment. However, the inability of Netscape to
>provide for multiple mailboxes is proving to be seriously inconvenient .
Netscape 4.51 allows multple mailboxes. Or you might like postilion.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andr� Bell [aka Andre Bell])
Subject: Newbie question: How "network" my linux pc to my win95 pc?
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 01:58:11 GMT
Do you know an easy way to "network" my linux pc to my win95 pc, preferably
via a serial connection or via null modems?
My linux pc will be for local use only and will not be connected to the
Internet. I need a somewhat simple method for connecting my win95 system to
the linux (debian) pc so i can exchange files between the two.
I'm familiar with direct connect with win95 between another win95 pc. I just
don't know how to accomplish this with linux.
If you know apps or know a solution using tools on my linux system I'd really
appreciate the help.
Thanks!
Andre'
------------------------------
From: "Mohamed S. Abdallah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Newbie: Ethernet card not detected
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 22:17:06 -0700
I just installed Red Hat 6.0 and it doesn't detect my NE2000 compatible
ethernet card. The card is a SMC EZ 10 ISA. If I need to install a
device driver for the card, where do I get it from and how do I install
it? Otherwise, what settings do I need to make?
Thanks,
Mohamed
------------------------------
From: "Ross Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: telnet delay???
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 05:52:18 -0700
Hi Jack,
I have tried what you said and resolved the problem.
I would just like to say thanks for your help
Ross Oliver
To Jim Roberts and Michael Balderas
Thanks for repling I have now sorted the problem
Ross Oliver
------------------------------
Subject: Re: 2 nic cards help!!!
From: clonq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 06:02:02 GMT
Hi,
I had the same problem with a compaq netflex 3/p as a second card
and I partialy solved it with:
insmod tlan
then ifconfig
But I can't ping it. Anyone has any sugestion?
Thanks,
Ovi
"Rob van der Putten" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Hi there
>
>
>On Sun, 2 May 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Rob I finally got it working after following your advice and
taking one look at
>> the ethernet howto. I must confess to not following precisely
what the
>> documentation had said. But after your email message and
carefully reading the
>> howto i was able to get eth1 up. My conf.modules looks like
this now: ...
>
>> alias eth0 ne
>> alias eth1 ne
>> options ne io=0x300,0x340
>
>That's nice.
>Now I know how to do this on a RH box.
>
>Is there actually a howto wich tells you how to do this.
>If not someone should write one.
>
>
>Regards,
>Rob
>
>+----------------------------------------------------------------
========+
>| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html
|
>+----------------------------------------------------------------
========+
>
------------------------------
From: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Newbie] Troubles with ISA ethernet card
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 20:24:11 -0400
I'll give you a few troubleshooting commands to run, then post the output
back to the group here:
ifconfig
netstat -rn
route
cat /proc/ioports
cat /proc/interrupts
dmesg
Let people interpret all of it for you....
Touffi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I own a ISA pnp NE 2000 compatible ethernet card.
> During Mandrake 5.3 installation process (network configuration part), it
> asks for wich module to use.
> I've tried Ne and compatibles, specified the io an irq that I found in
> Win98, but it still says that it doesn't find anything.
> Now, during the boot process, isapnp detect the board and gives some
> informations about it, wich I checked in isapnp.conf and are correct (irq,
> io).
> But I guess it's not enough, as it still doesn't work.
>
> insmod ne io=0240 irq=10
> -> says that the device is busy or unreachable
> cat /proc/devices
> ->don't really know how to interpret what I see, but it doesn't seems that
> anything related to my card is in there.
>
> I've also tried a few other stuffs that I can't remember.
>
> I've read that the boot sequence should show a line begining with "eth0=..."
> ; I guess that if I can't even reach this point, it's nosense trying to
> configure my network under kde ... but correct me if I'm wrong 8-)
>
> As it's said in the topic, I'm a linux newbie and so I don't know if I'm
> giving the right information for you to help me. Please let me know if I
> forgot any crucial informations.
>
> Thanks by advance.
>
> Touffi
--
Nate Campi | "My statements in this message are
| personal opinions which may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | have no basis whatsoever in fact."
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,linux.redhat.misc,linux.samba,comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 (Samba shared printers) + Windows 2000 Professional (beta 3)
== NO GO!
Date: 8 May 1999 07:34:47 GMT
In linux.redhat.misc Fred Read <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too have been having a hard time getting printer sharing to work. I had it
> working in two minutes in RH5.2, but something's different in 6.0 I guess.
> I have a Deskjet 600 on a RH6 box that will print just fine from the local
> host, but not from my NT workstation! The file shares are working like a charm
> for me. It's using the encrypted passwords and everything. Did you do anything
> different to get it up and going when you were still in NT4?
I had a heck of a time getting samba going in RH 6.0. And that was only on
the client side of things. It seems that all the scripts and programs have
changed. All the variable names and switches have changed! That was for
smbmount and the like.
Even the man pages are now only half the size. I haven't done anything on
the server side of things but is it possible that they've changed things
around?
--
==========================================================================
Dan Ghozali Ph +61-3-343-1686
Dept. of Geological Sciences, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Canterbury, http://members.tripod.com/kiwidan
Christchurch - New Zealand
==========================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Sauer)
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: Strange problem while connected to foreing host
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 08:36:49 GMT
Hi,
Seems not to be the problem, because down and uploads are working fine
on both sides when connected to the Internet. Which is done over the
same line!
Thanks
J�rg
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Any one fancy a MAN ? - the GAGFAN proposal
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 02:38:28 GMT
Any one fancy a MAN ? - the GAGFAN proposal
I've just been putting a LAN in my house - it's a big
surprise to see data running around at 10M bit/sec rather
than the 56 k/sec for a BT connection to "the" internet and I
don't have to pay to use my LAN.
Statistics prove that around one in four British houses have
a computer ( more than any other nation ) - so why not extend
a LAN down the street? In other words a user supported
Metropolitan Area Network - MAN. Or a Gossiping Across Garden
Fence Area Network - GAGFAN.
The hardware looks simple - you need an ethernet card and
a streetsworth of cable. Two or more cards and you can play
at being a router or repeater. Ethernet on a coaxial cable
should be good for 100m. Drawbacks with cable are the
problems of placement of the cable, and electrical safety -
the ethernet card insulates your computer to 3 KV, touching
the cable could not be guaranteed safe, but you can add an
isolating transformer, unlike the PSTN.
There are some interesting alternatives to cable: fibre
optic, line-of-sight optical, and radio ( allows mobile
operation ) - either the purpose built wireless LAN adapters
1 Mbit/sec and about 100m range ( very new stuff 2.4GHz ),
line-of-sight microwave links ( some good amateur systems
have been built, 10Mbits, 10GHz ), or licence-free low power
UHF transceivers - so far only up to 9600 bit/sec but you can
have more than one transceiver, if you're desperate you could
use CB or amateur radio UHF or VHF with a modem or sound card
at 1200bit/sec. ( Try a search for ALOHA ).
Once it's installed you only pay the electricity bill -
and when the millennium bug pulls the plug on BT or BT's
power supply - you still have communications. Not only can
you exchange data on the MAN, but with internet-phone and
internet-video software you wont need the BT system to make a
phone call.
Software brought straight out of the box will do some of
the functions, but more than standard Microsoft -ie Linux -
may be required. TCP/IP could have trouble with 32 bit
address space, the amount of routing information being
transmitted, and redundant routes - more than one path.
No Copyright.
Vincent Halsall
vincent at halsall dot netkonect dot co dot uk
More info:
http://www.netkonect.co.uk/~halsall/index.htm
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/greater/523
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthias Papesch)
Subject: Running X through a masquerading router
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 11:00:10 +0100
Hi,
I've set up a local ethernet in the private IP-space 192.168.0.* . It is
connected to the internet throgh a masquerading linux router using dynamic
IP-adresses. So far everything works out. Now I'd like to to run X-programs
on a remote site, which works fine from the router.But
how can I connect the DISPLAY to a local system which cannot be seen from
the outside?
Any help appreciated.
Thanks,
Matthias
------------------------------
From: "Sunil P. Khatri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: HELP - 3c589/Thinkpad 770X and ethernet random behavior...
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 01:05:11 GMT
David Hinds wrote:
>
> Sunil P. Khatri ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : I am running 2.0.36, pcmcia version 3.0.9, on a Thinkpad 770X
> : with a 3c589 network card.
> :
> : When I insert the network card, I sometimes get a good ethernet
> : connection (about 50% of the time) and the rest of the time, the
> : ethernet initialization does not get done.
>
> Is the 50% completely random?
Yes, it occurs without any pattern. I have faced the problem for about
a month, and cant see any trends in the behavior...
>
> Does "cardctl eject ; cardctl insert" or "cardctl reset" help?
No it doesnt help. I ran the eject/insert sequence, and notice the same
erratic formation of connections.
> Check your system log for error messages. Check "ps xf" to see if
> the network script is hung up somewhere.
No it is not hung, I can see the progress by "tail -f"-ing
/var/log/messages.
>
> : So I ran the ethernet initialization manually, using the following
> : sequence of commands.
> :
> : ifconfig eth0 24.7.91.103 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
> : route add -net 24.7.91.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0
> : route add default gw 24.7.91.1 eth0
> :
> : Again, about 50% of the times, when I do a "netstat -r", the
> : netstat command seems to hang and does not mention the default
> : route. Whenever I get a good ethernet connection, the netstat
> : command mentions a default route
>
> Try "netstat -rn". "netstat -r" may try to resolve addresses using
> your nameservers, which will likely hang if the network connection is
> acting up.
>
Tried "netstat -rn" when "netstat -r" had hung. The output is listed
below:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
24.7.91.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
lo
0.0.0.0 24.7.91.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
eth0
> : I used to get "kernel: i82365: infinite loop in interrupt handler"
> : messages in my /var/log/messages, perhaps these are related to the
> : problem..
>
> I don't know.
>
> -- Dave Hinds
Thanks a bunch for your prompt reply, Dave.
Sunil
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joerg Sauer)
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux
Subject: Re: Strange problem while connected to foreing host
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 08:56:30 GMT
Hi Erik,
sorry but I seem to be a fool.
I switched RST provoking mode off and everything seems to work fine.
I changed the mode to 1 so that the addresses are rewritten. I don't
no yet if my Win95 will still connect propperly to the Internet when
the line was down, but till now it seems to work.
Just one question, if I switch off IP_DYNIP in Suse, how do I switch
on mode 1 (echo 1 > .....) on reboot?
Thanks in advance and sorry that I did't figured out your first
answer!
J�rg
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: Linux newbie: Telnet and inetd setup
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 19:21:27 GMT
In article <7gv7pn$a59$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Georg Cantor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just installed my first Linux setup, Redhat 5.2.
> and have 3 questions to ask.
>
>
> 1. When I try to telnet from another machine, I receive no response.
> Nothing happens at all. The man pages state it can be started via inet.d,
> which I do not know much about.
>
> I have added users to the system, and I can even access their directories
> via Samba, but somehow I cannot get telnet via root or any other user. Does
> adding users automatically give telnet access or does that have to be
> configured separately?
>
> I need to know if the telnet daemon is actually running on the server, and
> how to setup users to access the machine from outside.
>
> 2. The telnetd man pages state that telnetd can be started via inetd at boot
> time. Can anyone show me how this is done? It appears that inetd is an
> important networking utility used by a lot of programs.
>
> 3. I would also like to know about the Linux equivalent of autoexec.bat or
> Windows NT startup services. How it works, and which file or files handles
> this at boot time?
>
>
Most distributions come with telnet enabled. You can check /etc/inetd.conf
for the line that reads;
telnet stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd in.telnetd
As long as there is no # sign at the front of the line, Telnet should
start when port 23 is accessed. This port value can be checked in the
/etc/services file.
You can check the /var/log/messages file for possible errors. The telnet
damon is not started until requested. Also, make sure you have installed
portmap as one rpms during installation. And "inetd" is the network super
damon.
The scripts in the /etc/rc.d/init.d/ directory are the start up and
shutdown scripts. /etc/rc.d/rc3.d is the subdirectory that is used
for normal multiuser startup.
--
Jim Roberts Never enough time!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPPD error message capture
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 04:26:40 +0900
According to the following syslog, The version of ppp in kernel is 2.2.0
and pppd(deamon)'s version is 2.3.5.
Is it OK??
Sorry, I'm just asking.
> : -----------------
> : May 7 15:46:04 min9 kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University
>of California
> : May 7 15:46:04 min9 kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel allocation)
> : May 7 15:46:04 min9 kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code copyright 1995
>Caldera, Inc.
> : May 7 15:46:04 min9 kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
> : May 7 15:46:04 min9 kernel: registered device ppp0
> : May 7 15:46:04 min9 pppd[688]: pppd 2.3.5 started by min9, uid 500
> : May 7 15:46:19 min9 pppd[688]: Using interface ppp-1073743108
> : May 7 15:46:19 min9 pppd[688]: Connect: ppp-1073743108 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> : May 7 15:46:19 min9 modprobe: can't locate module ppp-1073743108
> : May 7 15:46:19 min9 pppd[688]: ioctl(SIOCSIFMTU): Operation not supported by
>device(19)
> : May 7 15:46:20 min9 pppd[688]: Exit.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail
Subject: Making Outlook Express work with Qmail
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 19:28:17 GMT
Ok everyone,
I managed to get qmail working on my machine. I now want to hook it up with
IMAP on Microsoft Outlook Express. What program do I use to have qmail do
this?
(Forgive me for asking such a retarded question).
- Steve
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
