Linux-Networking Digest #84, Volume #11 Sat, 8 May 99 16:13:41 EDT
Contents:
new RH 5.2 install not recognizing 3c509 cards (Dean and Mary Guenther)
Linux as syslog server ("Josh")
Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly ("nnnn")
Re: samba cant see win98 shares (Serial # 0)
Re: PPP server setup problem (Clifford Kite)
Re: mouse driver.....relevant to NETWORKING!!!!! (Clifford Kite)
ISAPNP card questions] ("Wm. Josiah Erikson")
netscape 4.51 and IR5 (James Smith)
Re: procmail lockfiles?? ("Andrew Higgs")
Re: Need Apache DB Advice (John Murtari)
Re: no pingies in very simple network (Rob van der Putten)
Re: Network/cable modem configuration help needed ($)
Re: Need Help with @ Home Cable modem setup on RH5.2 ($teve)
Trouble pinging Linux from Tektronix xterminal (David H.)
Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network? ("An Bui")
Re: Connect Linux box with Win95 using TCP/IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Mail Problem with POP Server ... ("Leopold Toetsch")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Dean and Mary Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux
Subject: new RH 5.2 install not recognizing 3c509 cards
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 11:49:39 -0700
Hi,
I've installed RH 5.2 on a Micron machine and I'm having trouble getting
it to see a 3com509 ethernet card. I've actually tried 2 different
cards. One is a 3c509 and the other is a 3c509b, neither are seen by the
system.
When linux boots, it gives the message:
insmod: /lib/modules/preferred/net/3c509.o: symbol for parameter io not
found
delaying etho initialization
In my /etc/conf.modules I have:
alias eth0 3c509
options 3c509 io=0x300 irq=10
I have no idea what the io/irq should really be. I tried 340/9 and
various combinations, but can't determine the right combination.
I downloaded 3c5x9 and compiled it, I thoug the "-a" option might reveal
the settings, but it didn't.
I then downloaded 3c509cfg.exe and tried to get it to run under dosemu
but dosemu wouldn't startup.
Is there any way under linux to determine what the io/irq should
be...without having to put this card on a dos machine and check it out??
thanks -- Dean
------------------------------
From: "Josh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux as syslog server
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 14:55:53 GMT
I want to use Linux server as syslog server gathering info from cisco
routers. In the /etc/syslog.conf file i have an entry like following:
local7.debug /var/log/routerlog
and i am running sysylogd with -r option. On the router i have enabled
logging with the following commands:
service timestamps
logging <ip address>
logging trap info
But this does not seem to work. Can antbody point what i am missing here ?
Thanks
Joshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "nnnn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 13:53:48 GMT
When you're in love, you are blind...
Jeff Volckaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7gmu2o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I just did two Redhat 6.0 installs over the weekend and thought some
people
> might like to read some comments. Overall I'm really impressed. Every
> Redhat version since 3.0.3 has raised my expectations of Linux and not let
> me down.
>
>
> The good:
>
> The single disk ftp install is great. It's also nice to test the X setup
> during install.
>
> The bootup process is nicer since they added green OKs (Red faileds) and
> changed the X login screen to a much more stylish graphic.
>
> I LOVE the login option to select Gnome, KDE, etc on login. Great job
> Redhat!
>
> The desktops keep getting better all the time, this is no exception. This
> is my first experience using Gnome and I love it. Just need better
> installed themes now. Can't they work a deal with www.themes.org or
> something?
>
> All my hardware (with the exception of my Hauppauge tuner card) works
> flawlessly. Ensonique sound, Riva128 video, 13G seagate drive and ne2000
> network included.
>
>
> The Bad:
>
> I've had a few hard locks. Ouch! Some of my first with Linux (which i've
> been using for over 3 years). Not a good trend to start.
>
> LICQ segment faults now... could be LICQ though.
>
> Still haven't got XawTV working with my Hauppauge tuner card. I'll have
to
> mess around with hand loading modules like I had to do with Redhat
> 5.2+2.2.5. Just hoping I wouldn't have to.
>
>
> The Ugly:
>
> The Ultima Online client will not run under Gnome but will under
WindowMaker
> (without sound though, but that's Origin's prob).
>
> DHCP will not work with my Cable modem. My workstations DHCP fine to my
> Linux DHCP server though. This one really hurts and prevents me from
> upgrading my firewall until it's fixed. I'm told that Redhat now uses a
> program called pump instead of dhcpcd.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Serial # 0)
Subject: Re: samba cant see win98 shares
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 19:00:43 GMT
On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 13:44:14 -0700, "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
As far as I know this type of functionality is still not implemented
in Samba but is being worked on for future versions. With user-level
security you can browse shares on your Samba-server but cannot browse
shares on other hosts.
You can try to get the most recent (and unstable) version by getting
it via CVS though I don't know whether or not it's included in their
development (NT) branche.
For more info on CVS or NT specific issues read the manuals or howto's
Jeroen Kleijer
>new to linux
>I have a small network of 1 linux redhat 5.2 kernel 2.0.36 running samba
>1.9.18p10 and 1 win98 computer.
>I recently changed my network security from share level to user level, and I
>can't see my windows shares on the network anymore. I can see and access my
>redhat shares from windows network neighborhood. Some of the symtoms which
>seem to provide clues to the origin of the problem include the following:
>When trying to set up the windows printer as a shared network printer I
>recieve this message " you cannot view the list of users at this time.
>Please try again later."
>from windows DOS prompt running net view \\windowsHostname I get:
>C:\>net view \\192.168.1.1
>
>Error 1311: There are currently no logon servers available to service the
>logon request.
>
>in linux running smbclient -L windowshostname I get:
>smbclient -L windowshostname
>Added interface ip=192.168.1.254 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
>SMBnegprot failed. myname=LINU destname=CERI - ERRSRV - 1311
>
>and running testparm smb.conf I noticed 2 peculiar settings that might be a
>problem, but I dont know how to change them.
>protocol = NT1
>announce as = NT
>I see in Sery's book "Linux Network Toolkit" these are set as:
>protocol: 8
>announce as: 1
>
>Can anyone identify the problem or point me to where to look for a solution?
>TIA
>
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: PPP server setup problem
Date: 3 May 1999 10:51:04 -0500
Yue-Herng Lin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: The routing table after PPP established:
: Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
: Iface
: 192.168.0.50 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0
: 0 ppp0
: 192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
: 0 eth0
: 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0
: 0 lo
This looks to me like you define a 192.168.2.0/24 subnet by the network
route to eth0 and want to use the ppp interface on a different subnet,
192.168.0.0/24 . The proxyarp option works only when the call-in
machine's IP address belongs to the same subnet as the ethernet LAN to
which the called-to machine is attached.
I'll cheerfully admit that this answer might not be correct, if it breaks
then you get to keep both pieces.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Better is the enemy of good enough. */
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: mouse driver.....relevant to NETWORKING!!!!!
Date: 3 May 1999 10:56:30 -0500
Shahriar Rahman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: as a new user of redhat LINUX, i've installed it into my computer and got it
: working fine except that, in the xwindows system, my mouse is NOT being
: resognised. that is it's always frozen....:-( is it becoz the driver wasn't
Probably an IRQ conflict with another device. Networking card?
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The signal-to-noise ratio is too low in many [news] groups to make
* them good candidates for archiving.
* --- Mike Moraes, Answers to FAQs about Usenet */
------------------------------
From: "Wm. Josiah Erikson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISAPNP card questions]
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 15:06:34 +0100
Path:
EUBPEBAS.SONY.com!news-master.compuserve.com!arl-news-svc-1.compuserve.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!umass.edu!news!172.20.99.118
NNTP-Posting-Host: 172.20.99.118
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.setup
From: "Wm. Josiah Erikson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISAPNP card questions
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Wm. Josiah Erikson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 02:29:13 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 23
X-Newsreader: Microsoft (R) Exchange Internet News Service Version 5.5.2448.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I'm running RH 6.0/kernel 2.2.7 on a 486/33 with 20MB of RAM.
The Intel EtherExpress 16 card referred to below is a 10BT ISA PnP
Ethernet card.
I have an Intel EtherExpress 16 card (as well as a WD8003, eth0, which
works fine and I have no problems with). It used to work just fine with
the generic kernel that got installed on my machine when I installed RH
6.0 (and RH 5.2, for that matter). Whenever I recompile my kernel, it
stops working, even though I built EtherExpress 16 support into the
kernel. I think before it was compiled as a module... is this necessary
to make it work? The card is an ISA PnP card... does this mean that I
have to use isapnp to make it work right? The format of isapnp.conf
looks really cryptic to me and I can't quite make it out. I know that
the card is currently set to IRQ 5 and IO 0x310. This is fine, doesn't
conflict with anything, and I'd rather just leave it there and tell my
machine that's where it is. Is there any way to do this? Right now it
just says, "Delaying eth1 initialization" upon startup.
I think maybe I'll just stop trying to use ISA PnP card with
Linux : ) Nah, I can figure it out... but if somebody could gimme some
pointers that would be great. Please cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED] since I
don't always read every message that comes through this newsgroup.
Thanks much!
-Josiah
http://bork.hampshire.edu (the Linux box I'm referring to here)
------------------------------
From: James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.help,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: netscape 4.51 and IR5
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 07:29:20 -0400
i have downloaded both netscape 4.51 and IE5, and already have netscape
4.07 on here. when i tried to install IE5 it said it couldnt run the
binary. And I successfully managed to install netscape 4.51 but now
don't know how to start 4.51 rather than 4.07. can anyone help with
either of these problems?
------------------------------
From: "Andrew Higgs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: procmail lockfiles??
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 13:36:31 +0200
Nevermind I found it.
For those who are interested they are located in the /var./temp/.pop
directory.
Kind regards
Andrew Higgs
Andrew Higgs wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi,
>
>I had some problems receiving mail from my Linux mail server and it seems
to
>not have cleared a lock file. Where are these stored and how can I sort it
>out?
>
>Thank you very much.
>
>Kind regards
>Andrew Higgs
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: John Murtari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
Subject: Re: Need Apache DB Advice
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 23:23:25 -0400
Anthony Ewell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have to put together an internal company Apache server on a Red
> Hat Linux box. The main application Apache need to run is a web
> page that is tied into a database and must have both read and write
> access to the database.
>
> Does anyone have any opinions on what is the easiest, best way to
> go at this? What is the easiest way to link Apache to the database,
> etc.?
I think you really like the PHP3/mySQL combination. We have some live
examples loaded, including source code, that you can look at to get
started.
http://www.thebook-demo.com/php
Hope they help.
--
John
______________________________________________________
Customer Service Sofware Workshop Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "TheBook.Com" (TM)
315-635-1968, x-211
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: no pingies in very simple network
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 13:44:44 +0200
Hi there
On Fri, 7 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Problem solved! After swichting off PNP, manually configuring Windows, I
> reserved IRQ 10 in the BIOS for legacy ISA. Fired up Linux and it worked.
This is something one should ALWAYS do.
I (and probably most of us) asumed that you did. After all, it's part of
switching off PnP.
Regards,
Rob
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($)
Subject: Re: Network/cable modem configuration help needed
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 19:39:29 GMT
Try this URL. It helped me get closer, but I cant get the connection
to stay up for more then about 3 minutes ! Arrg!
http://www.vortech.net/rrlinux/
$teve
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 11:01:35 -0700, "nnnn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello.
>I am a complete newbie to Linux. Installation went fine, and I am trying toi
>configure my networking so I can use my cable modem. it works great under
>NT, but I hate NT cause enough is enough.
>Installation went fine my problem is my NIC.
>1. Every time I look at the card settings it says inactive. I activate, but
>I am not sure if that is all I need to do.
>2. My card is the 3c905b-TX
>3. Under Caldera, my card comes up as Cyclone
>4. Under Redhat , my card is Vortex
>My domain: bell.net
>machine name: Binky
>Static IP xxx.xxx.xx.xxx
>Subnet 255.255.255.0
>GW xxx.xxx.xx.xxx
>host binky
>dns search xxx.xxx.64.xxx
>dns search2 xxx.xxx.65.xxx
>
>I make the same entries as I do in NT and no luck. I heard the term
>re-compile the kernel but does it have to do anything with me ?
>Any help is appreciated.
>
>Please reply to the group so others can learn.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ($teve)
Subject: Re: Need Help with @ Home Cable modem setup on RH5.2
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 19:43:14 GMT
This is a helpful URL
http://www.vortech.net/rrlinux/
$teve
On Fri, 09 Apr 1999 21:39:57 GMT, Michael Tin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi, I have a Red Hat 5.2 Alpha box setup with a 466MHz 21164PC alpha
>processor.
>I have been trying to setup my network for days.
>I can talk and ping to my wintel machine but cant reach the outside
>internet world..
>I have two SMC EtherEZ cards(PCI) and they are obviously working if my
>two machines are talking to each other. But for some reason, my Alpha
>box wont go out side my intranet. It also takes a long time to access
>the system after startup, it stops for a long while at sendmail
>initilization.
>I have no idea what is happening.
>I think it is the setup I did during RH install. The machines have
>independant IP Addresses. I have a net gear hub that runs fine when I
>use two wintels but my alpha doesnt seem to communicate too well, but
>just enough to talk to my other computer, on the same hub(my wintel
>mentioned earlier). I used to think it was my ethernet cable but then
>it wouldnt talk to my wintel in the first place. Any help is
>appreciated.
>I think the problem now rests with the DNS routing, I cant ping my dns
>servers or my gateway.
>Mike Tin
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Please remove NOSPAM to reply via e-mail
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David H.)
Crossposted-To: comp.terminals,linux.redhat.misc,redhat.x.general
Subject: Trouble pinging Linux from Tektronix xterminal
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 19:42:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a TekTronix XP114C TekXpress xterminal that I'm trying to boot from a
linux box. Everything actually works I can even get xwindow to work (joy!),
but I have to jump through all kinds of hoops to get the terminal to ping the
linux host (not to mention boot from it). This is weird, but here goes:
Ping only works if I first reboot the terminal, then boot the server! If I
reboot or reset the terminal without rebooting the linux server, I loose my
ability to ping until the next time the server is booted.
Could this be a network card driver bug, a kernel bug, or a ping bug? I
think its a linux problem because I can ping a 95 box all day from the
terminal. If you have any ideas, I'd apprecitate hearing them. Also, if you
could direct me on how to futher investigate, that would be good, too.
Thanks!
David H.
=====================================================================
<PRE>
---------- ----------
| | | |
| RedHat | RJ45 | Tektronix|
| Linux |-----------------------------| xp114c |
| 5.2 | (crossover | |
| | direct connection) | |
---------- ----------
3com 3c905-TX Internal network card
192.168.0.1 192.168.0.3
in.tftpd TekXpress boot monitor v4.0
</PRE>
=====================================================================
------------------------------
From: "An Bui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network?
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 07:52:34 -0400
hi all
I just download the VNC. i try the Viewer and they ask for host:display
for host i type in my host like my IP but display what number should i put
down. can someplease give me a brief explain for this. I am a very new
with linux.
olivier
Ursa_M wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
|
|
|
|> Timothy Litwiller wrote:
|>
|> > yes, please send an URL
|> >
|> > Eugene VonNiederhausern wrote:
|> >
|> > > Cyrus Mehta wrote:
|> > >
|> > > > Hi,
|> > > >
|> > > > I am creating a dual Windows/Linux environment using Samba for file
serving
|> > > > on a standard Ethernet network. I was wondering what kind of X
server software
|> > > > for the Windows side I could use to run some X windows apps off of
the LInux Box.
|> > > >
|> > > > Reliability is the most important factor, windows will crash often
enough without
|> > > > the help of the X server.
|> > > >
|> > > > Any ideas?
|> > > >
|> > > > CKM
|> > >
|> > > Yesterday, I found the best X server/viewer for windows (and linux)
that I have
|> > > seen yet and it is free (GNU Public License). It is called VNC from
Olivetti and
|> > > Oracle research laboratory. You can connect from linux->windows,
windows->linux,
|> > > linux->linux, windows->windows. It is a lot better than any of the
other products
|> > > I have seen ot this kind. I don't have the URL (it is at work) you
can email me or
|> > > post a reply and I will get it and reply.
|>
|> The URL is http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/ . Let me know what you
think...
|
|Ursa_M --> I am also using the VNC server and find it to be very reliable
and generally
|excellent. The install was easy. I tend to launch and kill the server
from a hyperterminal
|window via telnet and then sign onto the VNC X windows. VNC is persistent.
Unless you kill
|the session, the next time you login you will be EXACTLY where you were
when you closed the
|window. Server sessions can be conveniently killed from a command line,
telnet or direct,
|to keep that from being a problem. On the other hand, if you had multiple
devices going and
|wanted to keep an X windows session up while you moved from device to
device then this is a
|"feature" you would like. Personally, I haven't had a use for that yet so
just kill the
|session before I shut down my Win98 machine. VNC has never caused a hiccup
on either the
|Win98 or Linux side and is a very thin client on the Win98 side.
|
|Take care,
|
|Ursa_M
|
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Connect Linux box with Win95 using TCP/IP
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 18:46:57 GMT
Hi Mist and Curt. Thanks for your advice so far but I still havent had much
luck. Here are the exact details of what I tried:
Red Hat Linux release 5.2 (Apollo)
Kernel 2.0.36 on an i586
localhost login: root Password: Last login: Sat May 8 14:15:10 on tty2
localhost.localdomain:/root# broadcast 192.168.0.255 up < (ifconfig eth0
192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 up)
localhost.localdomain:/root# route add -net 192.168.0.0
localhost.localdomain:/root# netstat -nr Kernel IP routing table Destination
Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0
255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
lo
localhost.localdomain:/root# cat /proc/interrupts
0: 66930 timer
1: 1506 keyboard
2: 0 cascade
6: 18 + floppy
8: 1 + rtc
10: 7 eexpress
12: 1824 PS/2 Mouse
13: 1 math error
14: 19161 + ide0
localhost.localdomain:/root# ping 192.168.0.1
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.4 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.2 ms
blahh, blah...
My linux box isnt currently connected to the net, so I dont need to worry
about IP Masquerading. The only thing I want to do is get both machines to
talk.
Thanks again.
Rob
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribed to us that -
> >I am trying to connect a Linux and a win95 box using TCP/IP. However, I have
> >not been able to connect the two. Both machines have working ethernet cards
> >and have the correct drivers installed. I think my main problem is
> >configuring the Linux side. I have read the NET-3-HOWTO, but it hasnt helped
> >me. In anycase, here is how I set up the linux side:
> >
> >ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
> >route add 127.0.0.1
> >ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1
> >ifconfig eth0 netmask 255.255.255.0
> >ifconfig eth0 broadcast 192.168.0.255
>
> Those last three statements can be combined -
>
> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
> 192.168.0.255 up
>
> (That should all be one line.)
>
> >route add 192.168.0.0 device eth0
>
> You need -
>
> route add -net 192.168.0.0
>
> >
> >After doing this, I cant't even ping 192.168.0.1
> >
> >Anyway, on the Win95 side, I have assigned it IP 192.168.0.2, and
> >assigned the gateway as IP 192.168.0.2.
>
> If your intention is to connect to the net with the Linux box and using
> IP Masquerading to allow the windows box to use the connection, then the
> default gateway needs to be the IP of the Linux box. (192.168.0.1)
>
> HTH
>
> <snip>
> --
> Mist.
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mail Problem with POP Server ...
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 12:41:24 +0200
Hi,
Desmond Coughlan wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>-ERR being read already /usr/spool/mail/annie
>
You have lockfile in /usr/spool/mail/annie
rm it as root.
HTH
leo
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
