Linux-Networking Digest #96, Volume #11 Sun, 9 May 99 19:13:39 EDT
Contents:
Re: Serious Newbie - Can't locate eth0 (James Youngman)
Re: netscape 4.51 and IR5 (Partha Bagchi)
Re: Network Monitoring Software ("David H. Lipman")
NAT or Masquerading with 2 subnets... ("Robert Novitskey")
Re: GUI for Samba (nate)
Network timeouts (Jani Heinonen)
Re: Routing and router redundancy (Leslie Mikesell)
RH 6.0 Pump never assings an IP (razoon)
Re: HELP I can't connect to my ISP! (Nostradamus)
Re: Sendmail confusion for a newbie ("Greg")
Re: HELP I can't connect to my ISP! (albi)
Re: Multitech ZPW modem (Lew Pitcher)
Re: ip address (Greg)
Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (Paul Black)
Re: Modem sharing with Samba?? (Tobias Meyer)
Re: How to create a boot disk? (jwhite)
�ȧA�H�ͪ��Ĥ@�Ӥ@�ʸU. (Roy)
Dialup PPP very slow and packets lost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ip address (James Smith)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Serious Newbie - Can't locate eth0
Date: 08 May 1999 12:13:54 +0100
Jason Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please forgive my ignorance....I have 2 computers
> 1 runs windows 98 and has a ethernet card setup
> correctly (I believe...it pings itself fine, drivers are
> installed fine, etc)....and 1 runs Red Hat 5.2. The
> ethernet card is a PNP PCI Digital DECchip 21140 based
> card...I got the drivers (tulip.c from
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html..which
> I tried to compile unsuccessfully). I also have used netcfg
> to set the hosts and interfacesin Linux...the problem is that Linux
> doesn't seem to know about the ethernet card...and I'm not sure how to
> "install" it so that the o/s recognizes it. I'm not sure what com port
> it's on...and there is no /dev/eth0 device...and when I use netcfg to
> activate the etc0 with the IP that I have given it...it says:
> Delaying eth0 initialization. Any help would be greatly
> appreciated...thanks,
"Delaying eth0 initialization" just indicates that the thernet card
was not detected, but you have PCMCIA support installed, so the system
assumes it just has to wait for you ton insert the PCMCIA ehternet
card.
The reason the card wasn't detected is probably just that you need to
add "alias eth0 tulip" in /etc/conf.modules.
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: Partha Bagchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.help,linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: netscape 4.51 and IR5
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 15:45:18 -0400
IE5 does not run on Linux.
If you did a default installation of netscape 4.51, its probably installed
in /usr/loca/bin or something.
hunt out the paths for netscape:
find / -name netscape
Then make sure that 4.51 is linked to netscape and not 4.07.
James Smith wrote:
> i have downloaded both netscape 4.51 and IE5, and already have netscape
> 4.07 on here. when i tried to install IE5 it said it couldnt run the
> binary. And I successfully managed to install netscape 4.51 but now
> don't know how to start 4.51 rather than 4.07. can anyone help with
> either of these problems?
------------------------------
Reply-To: "David H. Lipman" <*[EMAIL PROTECTED]*>
From: "David H. Lipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.networks,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networks,microsoft.public.windowsnt
Subject: Re: Network Monitoring Software
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 20:55:47 GMT
I use Novell LanAlyzer. I have the software installed on a "promiscuous"
LAN card on a portable (not notebook) computer (P90 w/32 MB RAM DOS v.62
and LanAlizer 2.1)
Very powerful to work with TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, Netbios etc...
Can see network faults by analyzing packets. Jabber, Jibber are more
readily identified. Fragmentation and packet errors as well. If you BOSS
says get it, get it. Any managment tool is better than NONE ... Also
captures data for later reffereal and can export to delimted ASCII file for
Spreadsheet graphical/statistical analysis.
Anytime a BOSS is will ing to spend ANY money on management tools DO IT !
Most IT managers of a corp. LAN like yours want to save money and don't have
foresight. Take advantage of situation and get something useful, not
expensive. A dedicated 'sniffer' is lot more expensive then a software
based analyzer. Even WinNT SMS has a built in one (NT Server has it but a
greatly scaled back version to point being useless, SMS version is full
blown).
HP OpenView is #1 for SNMP managment of Metropolitan Area Netwoks. Overkill
for under 200 nodes.
Ken Szeto wrote in message ...
>I would like to get some feedback from people who are currently using or
>used Network Monitoring Tools such as 3COM Transcend, HP Openview,
Lanalyzer
>and any another network monitoring software. Reason I am asking this is
>because my [stupid] supervisor thinks that a 60 users network requires one
>and it would greatly improve (his) ability to troubleshoot and pinpoint
>where problems are. Does anyone agree to this statement? I just hate to
>see the company I am working for have to spend silly money for this kind of
>software because I don't think it is necessary for our current network
size.
>
>If you have anything to share, please let me know. Thank you very much.
>
>Ken Szeto, MCSE
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Robert Novitskey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NAT or Masquerading with 2 subnets...
Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 12:44:28 -0700
Hello,
I'm trying to set up a shared internet connection. My problem is that I
have 2 subnets in my house. My office is one, and my wife's office is the
other (she is connected to the internet machine via phoneline Ethernet).
I have put together a machine to connect these two subnets to the internet
(I'll call this the internet machine). I have a DSL internet connection
through GTE in Seattle. The internet machine contains an Ethernet card for
the DSL connection, an Ethernet card for my office, and the phoneline
Ethernet card to hook up my wife's office. (The machine also has a modem
for use as a fallback connection if the DSL goes down; please keep that in
mind.)
I am using the 169.254.*.* private IP's on our internal machines. I would
like to set up the Ethernet interfaces as follows:
-eth0 (DSL), ISP uses DHCP, so config info is dynamic
-eth1, my office, IP=169.254.0.1, netmask=255.255.128.0
-eth2, phoneline, IP=169.254.129.1, netmask=255.255.128.0
I would like the internet machine to have a DHCP server, so I can set up my
internal machines to just pull config info from that machine. As well, I
need a DNS server that just forwards requests to my ISP's DNS. As well, I'd
like to run SAMBA, so I can put some file shares on this machine.
My basic question is, how can I config linux to do this? A pointer to a FAQ
or Howto would be fine. As well, is any distribution any better
"out-of-the-box" for what I want to do? Any info would be *extremely*
helpful.
Thanks,
BoB
--
Robert R. Novitskey
Remove ".nospam" to reply
------------------------------
From: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GUI for Samba
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 20:56:15 GMT
As of Samba 2.0 there is a web front end available.
Read the docs that came with it to figure it out, it's been a while for
me since I last configured Samba...
Philippe L� wrote:
> Hello
>
> Can anyone tell me where I could find an easy to use graphical front
> end to configure SAMBA
>
> Thank you
>
> you can email your answer at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nate Campi | "My statements in this message are
| personal opinions which may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | have no basis whatsoever in fact."
/ / (_)__ __ ____ __
/ /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / . . . t h e c h o i c e o f a
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ G N U g e n e r a t i o n . . .
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jani Heinonen)
Subject: Network timeouts
Date: 9 May 1999 19:45:59 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I recently installed (not upgraded) RH 6.0 and compiled a 2.2.7 kernel. I am
using AT1700 as my NIC and I'm suffering from weird network timeouts all the
time. The kernel error messages follow:
May 9 22:12:09 fun107 kernel: eth0: transmit timed out with status 0000,
network cable problem?
May 9 22:12:09 fun107 kernel: eth0: timeout registers: 4000 8182 4106 e85a
0404 0100 8000 0000.
May 9 22:12:39 fun107 kernel: eth0: transmit timed out with status 0040,
network cable problem?
May 9 22:12:39 fun107 kernel: eth0: timeout registers: 4040 8182 4106 e85a
0020 0100 8000 0000.
May 9 22:14:09 fun107 kernel: eth0: transmit timed out with status 0000,
network cable problem?
May 9 22:14:09 fun107 kernel: eth0: timeout registers: 4000 8182 4106 e85a
0404 0100 8000 0000.
In addition, the kernel whines about not finding the module for eth0 even
though I have "alias eth0 at1700" in /etc/conf.modules
What the hell is wrong?
--
Jani Heinonen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leslie Mikesell)
Subject: Re: Routing and router redundancy
Date: 9 May 1999 15:54:05 -0500
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for the suggestions but I'm a little puzzled.
>
>I thought the internet originally came from a distributed military network
>which would re-route information if one node was down (i.e. hit by a bomb) and
>so remove any weak links in the information chain.
Do you think a bomb is going to hit between your end nodes and the
router? Or take out the router and miss the end nodes?
>I had assumed that this sort of system would be possible to implement in a
>LAN. I must admit that in these days of raid, hot swappable drives and
>redundant power supplies in servers that it seems odd that a single router
>failure could effectively trash your network.
It is common to provide multiple routes among the routers and the
usual routing protocols take care of picking the best route
available as the connections and routers come and go. However
to do this all the way to the end nodes, you would have to run
a routing protocol on all of them. This is why most places use
dedicated routers and bridges instead of running them on machines
doing other things that will have to be taken down for upgrades,
etc. more often. Cisco has a protocol called HSRP (hot standby...)
where a single IP address is presented by the router that currently
has the best route (determined by interface availability). If one
router goes down, another will grab the address and keep routing for
machines using that address as their default route. Something
similar could probably be done with IP aliases on Linux boxes.
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (razoon)
Subject: RH 6.0 Pump never assings an IP
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 21:03:35 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just upgraded from Rh5.1 to 6.0 and did a full install. The
installation detected my eepro100 NIC and I told it to use dhcp at
startup.
When I boot the system there is a long delay while it tries to start
eth0 and eventually it says ok and continues on. However dchp never
seems to run and the nic is never assigned an ip. The first thing I
did was to make sure that the dhcp and dhcpcd rpm's were installed.
5.1 always worked flawlessly in this area. Any ideas what could be
wrong.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nostradamus)
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.linux.isp,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,nl.comp.os.linux,worldonline.linux
Subject: Re: HELP I can't connect to my ISP!
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 19:59:09 GMT
On Sun, 9 May 1999 21:38:10 +0200, "van Leur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>P.S. Sorry for my bad English. I'm from Holland
Crosspost from now on and post your messages in the nl.* hierarchy in
Dutch pleaz, especially when you *are* Dutch!
Dixi,
Nostradamus
"quos legent hosce versus mature censunto"
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail confusion for a newbie
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:48:45 -0400
Huuum does he need the linux smtp server to send mail from
outlook express. I dont on my system..? I dont run it at all
and mail from linux/Netscape working mighty fine also.
I assumed Outlook would do all the work i.e. connect to
the ISP smtp server, am I missing something here ??
Greg.
Jeff Griffiths wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>On Tue, 20 Apr 1999 02:49:11 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Batman) wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I have been playing with a stock RH 5.2 install on a small 'play' system
>>here at home. My intent has been to learn Linux ( and loose hair ).
>>
>>I've spent the last two weeks getting Sendmail, DNS, IMAP and POP3
configured
>>correctly. All works correctly except sending e-mail to the box from a
>>Windows 95 box running Outlook. My server has it's eth0 address set to
>>10.0.0.254 ( to insure I don't mess anyone up ) and I can do everything I
>>should be able to. I can receive e-mail, ping, telnet, ftp, and talk to
>>apache.
>>
>>However, whenever Outlook tries to send an e-mail, I get a message from
>>Outlook that says something to the effect that SMTP hasn't responded to it
>>for more than 60 seconds. The message box goes away and the mail is
delivered
>>( to root in this case. ) I can send from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>and my Outlook client get's everything correctly. I just can't get stuff
to
>>go back very well.
>>
>>Any thoughts on what I might have configured wrong on the Linux side?
>>
>>
>>Thanks in advance for the help!
>>
>Don't remember for sure.. but this might be an IDENT problem. Couple
>of things to check:
>
>1. Do a netstat -na on your Linux box and make sure that your smtp
>daemon is listening on port 25. You should also be able to telnet to
>port 25 on the Linux box from the Windoze box and get a banner if SMTP
>is running. If it's not running find out why... if it is go to #2.
>
>2. Do netstat -na on the Linux box and check to see if the IDENT
>server is running on port 113. If it's not (and the default is to
>not run it on a few distributions), edit /etc/inetd.conf and remove
>the # (comment marker) from the line for ident. Then do a inet
>restart and check it again with netstat.
>
>3. If it still doesn't work it may be due to a DNS problem. Outlook
>always wants to do a reverse lookup on the server name. If you have
>DNS running on the Linux box make sure that it's set up correctly and
>that the Windoze box points at it. If you are not running DNS, put a
>HOSTS file in c:\windows on the Windoze box (There should be a sample
>file called hosts.sam there to help you with the syntax). After all
>that, check the setup of the server in Outlook and make sure it's set
>to point at the correct ports on the Linux box (it defaults to 25 and
>110, but it's possible to change these).
>
>That's about all I can manage to brain-dump at the moment.
>
>HTH&GL,
>Jeff
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (albi)
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.linux.isp,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,nl.comp.os.linux,worldonline.linux
Subject: Re: HELP I can't connect to my ISP!
Date: 9 May 1999 20:12:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anno Sun, 09 May 1999 19:59:09 GMT, schreef Nostradamus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>Crosspost from now on and post your messages in the nl.* hierarchy in
>Dutch pleaz, especially when you *are* Dutch!
Make that "Dont Crosspost" ...
Followup-To set to nl.comp.os.linux
-- greetings, Albert --
* Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux! (Unknown source)
------------------------------
From: Lew Pitcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multitech ZPW modem
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 16:09:35 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> sm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to get a PPP connection through a Multitech modem MT5634ZPW
> > supplied with an HP Pavilion 8215. At the installation, Linux RedHat 5.2
> > don't recognize it. Setserial shows that the UART is unkown. If I force
> > it to 16550A it doesn't help at the initialization with Minicom (no OK
> > return) and I can't have the line before dialing.
> > Thanks for some help.
> >
> >
>
> --
> "A pint of Plain is your only man".
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
You've got a "WinModem". Unfortunately, there are no Linux drivers for
"WinModems", and your modem will be useless in a linux system.
Do two things:
1) do a Deja News search for Linux and Winmodem, and read the reasons
why WinModems aren't supported
2) buy a real modem, and throw your winmodem in the trash
Lew Pitcher
Master Codewright and JOAT-in-training
------------------------------
From: Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.help,linux.redhat.ppp,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: ip address
Date: 09 May 1999 17:00:31 -0400
ifconfig
> how do i find out my ip address once im connected to the net?
------------------------------
From: Paul Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 22:49:29 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Hunt) wrote:
> How? My understanding is that there should be a sendmail.m4 file
> which m4 converts to sendmail.cf, which controls how sendmail works.
> However, there is no sendmail.m4 on my system. sendmail.cf looks a
> bit intimidating -- like rather bad ascii art in fact.
Don't touch .cf files, it's not worth it! Exactly what your .mc (not .m4)
file is called depends on your distribution, you could always write your
own, they not too hard.
> No, should I be? (I've got a dial-up account, not a machine permanently
> connected).
Definitely, you still get people trying to access various ports. Not all
of these are covered by TCP wrappers. Much better to be sure of what
may be accessed by external machines.
Paul
------------------------------
From: Tobias Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba
Subject: Re: Modem sharing with Samba??
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 00:17:52 +0200
"Rinaldi J. Montessi" wrote:
> Bob Farmer spake:
>
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Arash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Hi
> > > can i connect my modem to my linux box and share it with my
> > >MS-Windows PCs so that they can use the modem to connect to eg. an
> > >ISP? Can i use Samba for that?
> > >Do i need special software on my windows pcs? Can i use call back?
> > >
> > >Thanx,
> > >Arash :-)
> >
> > No you can't use Samba for that.
> >
> > --
> > Bob Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Computer Services, Sam Houston State University; Huntsville, TX
>
> Do a search for IP masking in the OS linux groups.
>
> --
> Rinaldi -
>
> Sometimes a cigar is merely a cigar. Sigmund Freud
>
> Visit the crew at:
> snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.test.multimedia
There also is a Howto which can be found
a) if you are using SuSE (dont know about other distributions): on your
local Disk at
/usr/doc/howto/en/html/mini/Windows-Modem-Sharing.html
b) propably at the SuSE home page (www.suse.de)
c) some other place in the WEB?? (howto didn't say where to find
original)
hope this helps
Tobias
------------------------------
From: jwhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to create a boot disk?
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 16:24:56 -0600
Hi Ian,
Try this page:
http://www.redhat.com/corp/support/errata/intel/rh51-errata-intel.html
Scroll down to Package: boot-disk
Download the boot.img and use rawrite.exe.
Ian Lunam wrote:
>
> Yesterday I could not seem to create a boot disk for my setup.
>
> I'd just transfered the who system onto a new, bigger HD (old one was
> hardware erroring) and wanted to boot off a floppy so I could lilo it.
>
> I'm running RedHat 5.1 - 2.0.36
>
> I followed every howto I could find.
>
> dd if=/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36 of=/dev/fd0
> reboot
> "Not a boot disk"
>
> Create a file system on /dev/fd0
> Mount on /mnt
> Copy contents of /boot onto it.
> create a lilo.conf on it as per the howtos
> lilo -C /mnt/lilo.conf
> umount /mnt
> reboot
> "Not a boot disk"
>
> Grabbed another floppy.
> dd if=/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36 of=/dev/fd0
> reboot
> "Starting Windows 95"
> Must have been an old '95 boot floppy.
>
> Give up.
>
> Create a '95 boot floppy.
> copy my kernel and loadlin onto it.
> boot off it
> loadlin vmlinuz root=/dev/hda2 ro
> Up she came.
>
> Any ideas why the Linux boot floppies wouldn't work but a '95 one would?
> And to be really annoying a floppy dd'ed with a kernel still booted '95?
>
> Ian
--
*********************************************************
Joseph White
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*********************************************************
------------------------------
From: Roy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: �ȧA�H�ͪ��Ĥ@�Ӥ@�ʸU.
Date: 9 May 1999 20:37:34 GMT
�������
HANG CHEONG INTERNATIONAL
�s���\������P:�ȧA�H�ͪ��Ĥ@�Ӥ@�ʸU.
�z�O�_�g�`���p��ݮi��P�D�˸���?
�Z�n����,���x�s�i�ζl�H�Ң� (Direct Mail)�O�_�w�g�L�k�F���z�w�����s�i�ĪG?
�P��N�ɶ��M�����ӶO�b���Ĥ������¦���P�覡�W,��ij�z����t�M�s�n��k��
���N�{�檺�s�i��P�覡.�Dzμs�i��P�覡�ӶO�Ӧh�H�O���O�Ӽs�i�O�ΩM�s�i
�įq������������,�]���\�h�j���q�g�L�f�V�����᳣�w��ij̬��g�٧ֳt�B�ĪG
��n��"�ӡТۢϢעڼs�i��P �� �ǯu�s�i��P" �]�N�O--���ں����Ң۵o�e�s�i,
�]�����T��g�٧ֳt�ӥB�Q�����ġI
�g���i���������P���C1000�� 1.5 .
��Y,20000000�U�ӦW�歼 0.0015����30000
�]�N�O�T�U�ӫȤ�|��z�R,�p�z���f�~���b�Q��50��,���A�i�Ȩ�
50��30000��1500000,�@�ʤ��Q�U!!!!!
�аݤH�ͪ��Ĥ@�Ӥ@�ʸU�A�n�p����,�{�b�N���i��@�Ӥ�N�Ȥ@�ʸU.
�Q�����h���Ҹg�P���~����.�u�n��ﲣ�~.���P�ȿ��S���D.
__________________________________________________________________________
���M��P�u��X��,2000�U���Ȥ�E-MAIL�a�}.���A�ܨ�����SUPER SALESMAN.
�M�~���t�o�q�l�n��.(�����n�z�L����ISP��MAIL SERVER,��A���q�����M�~
MAIL SERVER�t�W��).�ϥ�²��.
*���䤭�Q�U���Ȥ�E-MAIL�H�c�a�}.
*�x�W�@�ʸU���Ȥ�E-MAIL�H�c�a�}.
*�@�ɤG�d�U���Ȥ�E-MAIL�H�c�a�}.
(�̫��s�����99�~5��1��)
*��i1�~�K�O��s(���C��Q�U��)*
*(�A�e����99�~�u�ӷ~20�U���Ȥ�ǯu���X(����~,�a��,���q�W,�s�n��)*
*�s�W���w�� *�N�䴩 *�n���s *
*�ϥ�CD-R���Ф��˸�.(�ϥ�CD-AutoRun�ε��ﶵ����)
(���M�u�� $680 ) �ä[�L�����ϥΡC
680���u���L�O�Ӥp���A�]�\�A�{�b���ݭn�A�����O�H��n���P�u�@�W��
���~�ΪA�Ȯɻݭn�I
**************************************************************************
�����q��֦��j�����A���A�M�����������U��U�~ Email Address�A
�{�ɧڭ֦̾��h�ئ�~�����q�l�a�}.��w�����a��,���z���s�i��ǽT�ǰe.
�U,Bag 11,000 Address (�̫��s�����99�~4��13��) $1000
��´�~,Textile 10,000 Address (�̫��s�����99�~3��28��) $1000
��A,Garment 6,800 Address (�̫��s�����99�~1��4��) $1000
��ξ���,Furniture 5,500 Address (�̫��s�����98�~11��10��) $1000
�ݭn�U��U�~���� Email Address�A���H���p���ڭ̡I
**************************************************************************
���n������L�o���ȿ������|��I
(�q�ʼ��u)-(852)-83331002������
�a�}:����E�s�����~���24�����~��3��
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Dialup PPP very slow and packets lost
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 22:23:19 GMT
I seem to get connected to my ISP OK, but http transfer rates are very slow
(tens of bytes per second) and ping shows significant packet loss (40 - 80%).
I've tried speeds as low as 19200 with no significant improvement. Does
anybody have any ideas?
Thanks,
Dan
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.help,linux.redhat.ppp,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: ip address
Date: Sun, 09 May 1999 21:11:56 +0000
how do i find out my ip address once im connected to the net?
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
